DOCSLIB.ORG

QM1 - Tutorial 6 Finite Potential Well

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
QM1 - Tutorial 6 Finite Potential Well QM1 - Tutorial 6 Finite Potential Well Yaakov Yudkin 30 November 2017 Contents 1 Scattering VS Bound States 1 1.1 Scattering . 1 1.2 Bound States . 1 2 Example: Half Innite Potential Well 2 3 Example: Innite Square Well with Delta Barrier 5 1 Scattering VS Bound States Finite Well Potential Consider a nite potential well described by ( −V 0 < x < L V (x) = 0 0 else The energy E of the particle can be either positive or negative but is must be larger than −V0. 1.1 Scattering Energy If E > 0 this is a scattering problem. Since the particle is free the energy spectrum is continuous. Moreover, the energy is given as an initial condition. The task is then to nd the transmission and reection coecients using the probability currents. Classical Picture Think of a classical particle in the potential V (x) described above. It can be anywhere between x = −∞ and x = +1. This is why the particle is free. Solution of Schrodinger's Equation In order to solve for the scattering coecients we rst need to solve the Schrodinger equation. This is done by splitting up space and solving each region individually. In this case we get 8 Aeikx + Be−ikx x < 0 <> (x) = Ceiqx + De−iqx 0 < x < L :>F eikx x > L where p 2mE p2m(E + V ) k = and q = 0 ~ ~ Using the boundary conditions we can then nd the scattering coecients. 1.2 Bound States Energy In the lecture we will discuss the case E < 0. The particle is inside the potential well. We thus expect discrete energy levels. The task is to nd them. 1 Classical Picture For E < 0 a classical particle cannot be anywhere. It is conned to the region of the well, i.e. between x = 0 and x = L. Hence, this situation is called a bound state. The particle is bound to a certain region. In quantum mechanics the particle is still conned to the region of the well but there is a nite probability to nd the particle inside the wall. Solution of Schrodinger's Equation As mentioned above the goal is to nd the energy levels. For this we must solve the eigen value equation familiar to us as the time independent Schrodinger equation. Since the energy E is negative it will prove very useful to write E = − jEj. The Schrodinger equation is 2 d2 − ~ + V (x) (x) = − jEj (x) 2m dx2 We divide space into three regions and solve for (x) in each of them. We get 8 Aekx x < 0 <> (x) = Beiqx + Ce−iqx 0 < x < L :>De−kx x > L where p2m jEj p2m (V − jEj) k = and q = 0 ~ ~ From the boundary conditions the eigen energies can be found. In general an exact solution is not possible. Instead we will obtain a transcendental equation which can be solved graphically. 2 Example: Half Innite Potential Well Statement of the Problem Consider the well described by 8 1 x < 0 <> V (x) = 0 0 < x < L > :V0 x > L A particle of mass m is subject to this potential and found in a bound state. Find a transcendental equation for the energy eigen values and solve it graphically. Find the minimal depth V0 for a bound state to exist. Also nd the eigen functions. Relevant Energy Interval Think classically. The energy must be higher then the bottom of the well but low enough so it cant leave. This is the case for the interval 0 < E < V0. Split Space and Schrodinger We divide space into three. For the region x < 0 the wave function vanishes, i.e. (x < 0) = 0. This is simple. The other two regions are 0 < x < L and x > L. The Schrodinger equation in those regions is ( 2 2 ~ @ − 2m @x2 (x) = E (x) 0 < x < L 2 2 ~ @ − 2m @x2 (x) + V0 (x) = E (x) x > L We rearrange them to the form ( @2 2mE @x2 (x) = − 2 (x) 0 < x < L 2 2 ~ ~ @ 2m(E−V0) 2 (x) = − (x) x > L 2m @x ~ In the rst equation we replace k2 = 2mE=~2. In the second equation we rst put in the minus sign. 2m (E − V ) 2m (V − E) − 0 = 0 = q2 ~ ~ 2 This is important. Since E < V0 this is a positive quantity. We can now replace it by q without having to worry about imaginary numbers. The equations become ( @2 2 @x2 (x) = −k (x) 0 < x < L 2 2 ~ @ 2 2m @x2 (x) = q (x) x > L 2 We solve them and add the region x < 0 for which the wave function vanishes. The total wave function is 8 0 x < 0 <> (x) = Aeikx + Be−ikx 0 < x < L :>Ceqx + De−qx x > L Boundary Conditions Next we must use boundary conditions. Since there are four unknown constants and the unknown energy we will need ve equations. One of them will obviously be the normalization condition, but lets leave that to the end. In order to solve the problem we need four boundary conditions. They are: 1. (0) = 0 2. (x ! 1) = 0 3. (L−) = (L+) 4. 0(L−) = 0(L+) Condition (1) gives A + B = 0 The solution in region 0 < x < L can thus be rephrased Aeikx + Be−ikx = A eikx − e−ikx = 2A sin (kx) ! A sin(kx) From condition (2) we get C = 0 The total wave function is thus 8 0 x < 0 <> (x) = A sin(kx) 0 < x < L :>De−qx x > L Transcendental Equation for the Energy Now we use the boundary conditions (3) and (4). They give A sin(kL) = De−qL kA cos(kL) = −qDe−qL By dividing the second by the rst we can get rid of both A and D at once. One obtains q cot (kL) = − k Plugging the expression for k and q back in we get p ! r 2mE V cot L = − 0 − 1 ~ E The only unknown in this equation is the energy E. We cannot solve for E analytically (aka. transcendental equation). Change of Variables An easy way to get a idea of the solution is to solve graphically. For simplicity we dene the dimensionless quantities p p 2mE 2mV0 θ = L and θ0 = L ~ ~ The condition 0 < E < V0 becomes 0 < θ < θ0. The transcendental equation can now be written as s θ 2 cot θ = − 0 − 1 θ We see that for θ > θ0 the rhs is imaginary. This reects the condition 0 < θ < θ0 for which a bound state is possible. 3 Figure 1: Graphically solving the equation for the energy levels. Graphical Solution For the graphical solution follow a few easy steps: 1. plot the lhs (here cot θ) as a function of θ 2. plot the rhs as a function of θ for dierent choices of θ0 (play around with it) 3. the points at which the two plots intersect are a solution Minimal Depth Since the lhs is positive until π=2 there will be no solution to the equation if θ0 < π=2. This implies that if p 2 2 2mV0 π ~ π L < ! V0 < ~ 2 8mL2 there will be no bound state at all. The potential is to shallow for the particle to be conned inside it. Eigen Functions Next we want to nd the eigen functions belonging to the energies. Since we have found them we can treat k and q as known. Going back to condition (3) we have A sin(kL) = De−qL ! D = A sin(kL)eqL and thus the total wave function is 8 0 x < 0 <> (x) = A sin(kx) 0 < x < L :>A sin(kL)e−q(x−L) x > L The remaining constant (A) is found by imposing normalization. Watch out: the total wave function must be normalized and not the individual parts. The condition is Z 1 j (x)j2 dx = 1 −∞ Here it becomes Z L Z 1 j (0 < x < L)j2 dx + j (x > L)j2 dx = 1 0 L We can solve the integral Z L Z 1 1 =jAj2 sin2(kx)dx + jAj2 sin2(kL)e2qL e−2qxdx 0 L L sin(2kL) e−2qL =jAj2 − + jAj2 sin2(kL)e2qL 2 4k 2q L sin(2kL) sin2(kL) =jAj2 − + 2 4k 2q 4 and nd the normalization constant −1=2 L sin(2kL) sin2(kL) A = − + 2 4k 2q 3 Example: Innite Square Well with Delta Barrier Statement of the Problem Find the bound states for a particle of mass m in the potential ( βδ(x) jxj < L V (x) = 1 else Compare your results to the innite potential well without a delta function. Discuss the limit of vanishing and innite delta. Hint: It might be easier to use sinusoidal functions over exponential. Schrodinger Equation and Wave Function The wave function must vanish for jxj > L. Inside the well there are two distinct regions. The time independent Schrodinger equation is 2 d2 − ~ (x) = E (x) 2m dx2 in both regions and the solution is ( p A cos (kx) + B sin (kx) −L < x < 0 2mE (x) = where k = C cos (kx) + D sin (kx) 0 < x < L ~ Parity Since the potential is symmetric around x = 0 the wave functions must have a denite parity, i.e. (x) is either even or odd. We can treat both cases individually. We will rst treat the even case and then the odd case. Even Wave Function The wave function must satisfy (x) = (−x) So if we replace x by −x in (0 < x < L) it must be equal to (−L < x < 0). This implies C cos (kx) − D sin (kx) = A cos (kx) + B sin (kx) ! A = C and B = −D and so the even wave function is ( A cos (kx) + B sin (kx) −L < x < 0 even(x) = A cos (kx) − B sin (kx) 0 < x < L Boundary Condition: Continuity of Wave Function We now use the boundary conditions at x = ±L.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quantum Mechanics
    Quantum Mechanics Richard Fitzpatrick Professor of Physics The University of Texas at Austin Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Intendedaudience................................ 5 1.2 MajorSources .................................. 5 1.3 AimofCourse .................................. 6 1.4 OutlineofCourse ................................ 6 2 Probability Theory 7 2.1 Introduction ................................... 7 2.2 WhatisProbability?.............................. 7 2.3 CombiningProbabilities. ... 7 2.4 Mean,Variance,andStandardDeviation . ..... 9 2.5 ContinuousProbabilityDistributions. ........ 11 3 Wave-Particle Duality 13 3.1 Introduction ................................... 13 3.2 Wavefunctions.................................. 13 3.3 PlaneWaves ................................... 14 3.4 RepresentationofWavesviaComplexFunctions . ....... 15 3.5 ClassicalLightWaves ............................. 18 3.6 PhotoelectricEffect ............................. 19 3.7 QuantumTheoryofLight. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 21 3.8 ClassicalInterferenceofLightWaves . ...... 21 3.9 QuantumInterferenceofLight . 22 3.10 ClassicalParticles . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 25 3.11 QuantumParticles............................... 25 3.12 WavePackets .................................. 26 2 QUANTUM MECHANICS 3.13 EvolutionofWavePackets . 29 3.14 Heisenberg’sUncertaintyPrinciple . ........ 32 3.15 Schr¨odinger’sEquation . 35 3.16 CollapseoftheWaveFunction . 36 4 Fundamentals of Quantum Mechanics 39 4.1 Introduction ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Polarizability in the Three Dimensional Problem and the Solution of an Inhomogeneous Differential Equation
    Electric polarizability in the three dimensional problem and the solution of an inhomogeneous differential equation M. A. Maizea) and J. J. Smetankab) Department of Physics, Saint Vincent College, Latrobe, PA 15650 USA In previous publications, we illustrated the effectiveness of the method of the inhomogeneous differential equation in calculating the electric polarizability in the one-dimensional problem. In this paper, we extend our effort to apply the method to the three-dimensional problem. We calculate the energy shift of a quantum level using second-order perturbation theory. The energy shift is then used to calculate the electric polarizability due to the interaction between a static electric field and a charged particle moving under the influence of a spherical delta potential. No explicit use of the continuum states is necessary to derive our results. I. INTRODUCTION In previous work1-3, we employed the simple and elegant method of the inhomogeneous differential equation4 to calculate the energy shift of a quantum level in second-order perturbation theory. The energy shift was a result of an interaction between an applied static electric field and a charged particle moving under the influence of a one-dimensional bound 1 potential. The electric polarizability, , was obtained using the basic relationship ∆퐸 = 휖2 0 2 with ∆퐸0 being the energy shift and is the magnitude of the applied electric field. The method of the inhomogeneous differential equation devised by Dalgarno and Lewis4 and discussed by Schwartz5 can be used in a large variety of problems as a clever replacement for conventional perturbation methods. As we learn in our introductory courses in quantum mechanics, calculating the energy shift in second-order perturbation using conventional methods involves a sum (which can be infinite) or an integral that contains all possible states allowed by the transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Double Dirac Delta Potential
    Revisiting double Dirac delta potential Zafar Ahmed1, Sachin Kumar2, Mayank Sharma3, Vibhu Sharma3;4 1Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India 2Theoretical Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India 3;4Amity Institute of Applied Sciences, Amity University, Noida, UP, 201313, India∗ (Dated: June 14, 2016) Abstract We study a general double Dirac delta potential to show that this is the simplest yet versatile solvable potential to introduce double wells, avoided crossings, resonances and perfect transmission (T = 1). Perfect transmission energies turn out to be the critical property of symmetric and anti- symmetric cases wherein these discrete energies are found to correspond to the eigenvalues of Dirac delta potential placed symmetrically between two rigid walls. For well(s) or barrier(s), perfect transmission [or zero reflectivity, R(E)] at energy E = 0 is non-intuitive. However, earlier this has been found and called \threshold anomaly". Here we show that it is a critical phenomenon and we can have 0 ≤ R(0) < 1 when the parameters of the double delta potential satisfy an interesting condition. We also invoke zero-energy and zero curvature eigenstate ( (x) = Ax + B) of delta well between two symmetric rigid walls for R(0) = 0. We resolve that the resonant energies and the perfect transmission energies are different and they arise differently. arXiv:1603.07726v4 [quant-ph] 13 Jun 2016 ∗Electronic address: 1:[email protected], 2: [email protected], 3: [email protected], 4:[email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION The general one-dimensional Double Dirac Delta Potential (DDDP) is written as [see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Table: Various One Dimensional Potentials System Physical Potential Total Energies and Probability Density Significant Feature Correspondence Free Particle I.E
    Chapter 2 (Lecture 4-6) Schrodinger equation for some simple systems Table: Various one dimensional potentials System Physical Potential Total Energies and Probability density Significant feature correspondence Free particle i.e. Wave properties of Zero Potential Proton beam particle Molecule Infinite Potential Well Approximation of Infinite square confined to box finite well well potential 8 6 4 2 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 x Conduction Potential Barrier Penetration of Step Potential 4 electron near excluded region (E<V) surface of metal 3 2 1 0 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 x Neutron trying to Potential Barrier Partial reflection at Step potential escape nucleus 5 potential discontinuity (E>V) 4 3 2 1 0 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 x Α particle trying Potential Barrier Tunneling Barrier potential to escape 4 (E<V) Coulomb barrier 3 2 1 0 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 x 1 Electron Potential Barrier No reflection at Barrier potential 5 scattering from certain energies (E>V) negatively 4 ionized atom 3 2 1 0 4 2 0 2 4 6 8 x Neutron bound in Finite Potential Well Energy quantization Finite square well the nucleus potential 4 3 2 1 0 2 0 2 4 6 x Aromatic Degenerate quantum Particle in a ring compounds states contains atomic rings. Model the Quantization of energy Particle in a nucleus with a and degeneracy of spherical well potential which is or states zero inside the V=0 nuclear radius and infinite outside that radius.
    [Show full text]
  • LESSON PLAN B.Sc
    DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND NANOTECHNOLOGY LESSON PLAN B.Sc. – THIRD YEAR (2015-2016 REGULATION) FIFTH SEMESTER . SRM UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES SRM NAGAR, KATTANKULATHUR – 603 203 SRM UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND NANOTECHNOLOGY Third Year B.Sc Physics (2015-2016 Regulation) Course Code: UPY15501 Course Title: Quantum Mechanics Semester: V Course Time: JUL 2016 – DEC 2017 Location: S.R.M. UNIVERSITY OBJECTIVES 1. To understand the dual nature of matter wave. 2. To apply the Schrodinger equation to different potential. 3. To understand the Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation and its application. 4. To emphasize the significance of Harmonic Oscillator Potential and Hydrogen atom. Assessment Details: Cycle Test – I : 10 Marks Cycle Test – II : 10 Marks Model Exam : 20 Marks Assignments : 5 Marks Attendance : 5 Marks SRM UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND NANOTECHNOLOGY Third Year B.Sc Physics (2015-2016 Regulation) Total Course Semester Course Title L T P of C Code LTP II UPY15501 QUANTUM MECHANICS 4 1 - 5 4 UNIT I - WAVE NATURE OF MATTER Inadequacy of classical mechanics - Black body radiation - Quantum theory – Photo electric effect -Compton effect -Wave nature of matter-Expressions for de-Broglie wavelength - Davisson and Germer's experiment - G.P. Thomson experiment - Phase and group velocity and relation between them - Wave packet - Heisenberg's uncertainity principle – Its consequences (free electron cannot reside inside the nucleus and gamma ray microscope). UNIT II - QUANTUM POSTULATES Basic postulates of quantum mechanics - Schrodinger's equation - Time Independent -Time Dependant - Properties of wave function - Operator formalism – Energy - Momentum and Hamiltonian Operators - Interpretation of Wave Function - Probability Density and Probability - Conditions for Physical Acceptability of Wave Function -.
    [Show full text]
  • Piecewise Potentials II
    Physics 342 Lecture 13 Piecewise Potentials II Lecture 13 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Monday, February 25th, 2008 We have seen a few different types of behavior for the stationary states of piecewise potentials { we can have oscillatory solutions on one or both sides of a potential discontinuity, we can also have growing and decaying exponentials. In general, we will select between the oscillatory and decaying exponential by choosing an energy scale for the stationary state. Our final pass at this subject will begin with a finite step, where we set up some matrix machinery to avoid the tedious algebra that accompanies boundary matching. Aside from the result, the important observation is that the matrix form we develop is independent of the potential, so that we can apply this type of approach to any potential, provided it does not extend to infinity. Remember the process we are going through over and over (and over): Given a potential, find the stationary states, use those to form the general solution to Schr¨odinger'sequation by appending the appropriate temporal factor −i E t (e ~ ), and exploit completeness to decompose some initial ¯(x) waveform. In practice, as should be evident from our studies so far, this program is sensible but difficult. The initial distribution of choice, a Gaussian, has unwieldy decomposition in bases other than ei k x (the natural, Fourier set) { is there another/easier way to get a basic idea of what an initial Gaussian distribution does when evolved in time under the influence of a potential? Yes, and we discuss the simplest possible numerical solution at the end.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Probes for Minimum Length Estimation
    Alma Mater Studiorum · Università di Bologna Scuola di Scienze Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Fisica Quantum probes for minimum length estimation Relatore: Presentata da: Cristian Degli Esposti Boschi Alessandro Candeloro Correlatore: Matteo Paris Anno Accademico 2018/2019 Anche quando pare di poche spanne, un viaggio può restare senza ritorno. − Italo Calvino Abstract In this thesis we address the estimation of the minimum length arising from gravita- tional theories. In particular, we use tools from Quantum Estimation theory to provide bounds on precision and to assess the use of quantum probes to enhance the estima- tion performances. After a brief introduction to classical estimation theory and to its quantum counterparts, we introduce the concept of minimum length and show how it induces a perturbative term appearing in the Hamiltonian of any quantum system, which is proportional to a parameter depending on the minimum length. We have then system- atically studied the effects of this perturbation on different state preparations for several 1-dimensional systems, and evaluated the Quantum Fisher Information in order to find the ultimate bounds to the precision of any estimation procedure. Eventually, we have investigated the role of dimensionality on the precision, studying the 2-dimensional Har- monic oscillator. Our results provide a guideline to design possible future experiments to detect minimal length, and show the potential enhancement achievable using quantum probes. Acknowledgments Dal settembre del 2017 in cui ho intrapreso questo percorso, molte cose sono cambiate, sia a livello personale che scientifico. Vorrei ricordare e ringraziare chi è stato presente in questi due anni e ha contribuito direttamente o indirettamente a questo lavoro finale.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Time–Independent Schrödinger Equation
    Chapter 4 Time{Independent Schr¨odinger Equation 4.1 Stationary States We consider again the time dependent Schr¨odingerequation (Prop. 2.1) @ 2 i (t; x) = − ~ ∆ + V (x) (t; x) = H (t; x) ; (4.1) ~ @t 2m where the potential in the Hamiltonian is assumed to be time independent V = V (x). We calculate the solutions of this equation by using the method of separation of variables, i.e. we make the following ansatz for the solution (t; x): (t; x) = (x) f(t) (4.2) and insert it into the time dependent Schr¨odingerequation, Eq. (4.1), @ f(t) 2 @2 (x) 1 i (x) = − ~ f(t) + V (x) (x)f(t) j · ~ @t 2m @x2 (x) f(t) 1 df(t) 2 1 d2 (x) i = − ~ + V (x) : (4.3) ~ f(t) dt 2m (x) dx2 Since now the left hand side in Eq. (4.3) is only dependent on t and the right hand side only on x, both sides must be equal to a constant, which we will call E, and we can thus solve each side independently. The left side yields 1 df(t) df i i~ = E ) = − E dt f(t) dt f ~ i ) ln(f) = − E t + const. ) f = const. e−i E t =~ : (4.4) ~ The constant in Eq. (4.4) will later on be absorbed into (x). 69 70 CHAPTER 4. TIME{INDEPENDENT SCHRODINGER¨ EQUATION Then multiplying the right side of Eq. (4.3) with (x) we get 2 1 d2 (x) 2 d2 (x) − ~ + V (x) = E ) − ~ + V (x) (x) = E (x) : (4.5) 2m (x) dx2 2m dx2 | {z } H (x) The operators on the left express the Hamiltonian H acting on (x), which represents the time independent Schr¨odingerequation.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics Exercises Notes
    Quantum Mechanics Exercises Notes Elijan Mastnak Winter Semester 2020-2021 About These Notes These are my notes from the Exercises portion of the class Kvanta Mehanika (Quantum Mechanics), a required course for third-year physics students at the Faculty of Math and Physics in Ljubljana, Slovenia. The exact problem sets herein are specific to the physics program at the University of Ljubljana, but the content is fairly standard for a late- undergraduate quantum mechanics course. I am making the notes publically available in the hope that they might help others learning similar material|the most recent version can be found on GitHub. Navigation: For easier document navigation, the table of contents is \clickable", meaning you can jump directly to a section by clicking the colored section names in the table of contents. Unfortunately, the clickable links do not work in most online or mobile PDF viewers; you have to download the file first. On Authorship: The exercises are led by Asst. Prof. TomaˇzRejec, who has assembled the problem sets and guides us through the solutions. Accordingly, credit for the problems in these notes goes to Prof. Rejec. I have merely typeset the problems and provided an additional explanation or two where I saw fit. Disclaimer: Mistakes|both trivial typos and legitimate errors|are likely. Keep in mind that these are the notes of an undergraduate student in the process of learning the material himself|take what you read with a grain of salt. If you find mistakes and feel like telling me, by Github pull request, email or some other means, I'll be happy to hear from you, even for the most trivial of errors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Finite Spherical Well „ Analog of 1-1-DD Finite Potential Well
    Quantum Mechanics and Atomic Physics Lecture 15: Angular momentum and Central Potentials http: //www.p hys ics.rutgers.e du /ugra d/361 Prof. Sean Oh Last time S. E. in 3D and in spherical coordinates For a mass μ moving in a central potential V( r) Solutions separated into angular and radial parts Rewrite this in terms of angular momentum of the system Angular Solutions Magnetic quantum number Associated Legendre functions Orbital angular quantum number Spherical harmonic functions Space Quantization The maggqnetic quantum number mll exppqresses the quantization of direction of L So L can assume only certain angles, given above, with respect to the zz--axis.axis. This is called space quantization. Example For a particle with l=2, what are the possible angels that L can make with the z -axis? Plot of Spherical harmonics “3D” plots of: 2 θ is measured from thihe +z axis Independent of φ So rotationally symmetric around zz--axisaxis These man ifest themselves as the ppyrobability distributions Summary: Quantization of L, Lz and space Reed: Chapter 6 Radial Solutions To find radial solutions: This is called the radial equation Solving the radial equation Note: Let’s introduce the auxiliary function: And plug it in above The Total Wavefunction The total wavefunction We will soon define n to be the quantum number that dictates the quantization of energy First let’s solve this for two simple cases Infinite and finite spherical wells Spher ica l ana logs o f par tic le in a box Interest in nuclear physics: nuclei modeled
    [Show full text]
  • Particle in an Infinite Potential Well
    PARTICLE IN AN INFINITE POTENTIAL WELL CYL100 2013{14 September 2013 We will now look at the solutions of a particle of mass m confined to move along the x-axis between 0 to L. This is achieved by making the potential 0 between x = 0 and x = L and V = 1 for x < 0 and x > L (see Figure 1). In quantum mechanics this model is referred to as particle in a box (PIB) of length L. Figure 1: The one-dimensional infinite potential well of length L. It is divided into three regions, with regions I and III having V = 1 and region II having V = 0 Before we set up and solve the Schr¨odingerequation let us apply de Broglie's approach to this problem. de Broglie associates a wave with every material particle traveling with momentum p. The wavelength of the wave is h λ = : dB p The classical analog of a particle in a box is a string that is fixed at both ends. When such a string is plucked, we know that the amplitude of the oscillations at the fixed ends is zero. In other words, an integer number of half-wavelengths must fit in the length of the box. Applying this idea to the present case, we find that λ h n dB = n = L n = 1; 2; ··· 2 2p Solving for p we get nh p = 2L The particle feels no potential energy so all its energy is in the form of kinetic energy. As a result p2 E = : 2m Substituting for p, we get n2h2 E = n = 1; 2; ··· n 8mL2 Let us now proceed to analyze this problem quantum mechanically.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Some One-Dimensional Potentials This “Tillegg” Is a Supplement to Sections 3.1, 3.3 and 3.5 in Hemmer’S Book
    TFY4215/FY1006 | Tillegg 3 1 TILLEGG 3 3. Some one-dimensional potentials This \Tillegg" is a supplement to sections 3.1, 3.3 and 3.5 in Hemmer's book. Sections marked with *** are not part of the introductory courses (FY1006 and TFY4215). 3.1 General properties of energy eigenfunctions (Hemmer 3.1, B&J 3.6) For a particle moving in a one-dimensional potential V (x), the energy eigenfunctions are the acceptable solutions of the time-independent Schr¨odingerequation Hc = E : h¯2 @2 ! d2 2m − + V (x) = E ; or = [V (x) − E] : (T3.1) 2m @x2 dx2 h¯2 3.1.a Energy eigenfunctions can be chosen real Locally, this second-order differential equation has two independent solutions. Since V (x) and E both are real, we can notice that if a solution (x) (with energy E) of this equation is complex, then both the real and the imaginary parts of this solution, 1 1 <e[ (x)] = [ (x) + ∗(x)] and =m[ (x)] = [ (x) − ∗(x)]; 2 2i will satisfy (T3.1), for the energy E. This means that we can choose to work with two independent real solutions, if we wish (instead of the complex solutions (x) and ∗(x)). An example: For a free particle (V (x) = 0), 1 p (x) = eikx; with k = 2mE h¯ is a solution with energy E. But then also ∗(x) = exp(−ikx) is a solution with the same energy. If we wish, we can therefore choose to work with the real and imaginary parts of (x), which are respectively cos kx and sin kx, cf particle in a box.
    [Show full text]