<<

1955 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE 3893 By Mr. KILGORE: By Mr. ROOSEVELT: sels Tonnage Act, H. R. 2036, in its present H. R. 5288. A bill for the relief of Miguel H. R. 5293. A bill for the relief of George form; to the Committee on Armed Services. Flores Castro; to the Committee on the Quon Lok; to the Committee on the Ju­ 177. Also petition of Clifford Crail, Cin­ cinnati, Ohio, requesting that a copy of Judiciary. diciary. a. · H. R. 5294. A bill for the relief of Fernando letter to Mr. Corliss Lamont of November 15, H. R. 5289. A bill for the relief of Rodrigo 1954, be submitted to committee, in order Eulalia Santa Ana-Alvarado; to the Commit­ Galvan-Cruz; to the Committee on the Ju­ diciary. that Congress may investigate certain dese­ tee on the Judiciary. crations of the Bill of Rights by the law­ H. R. 5295. A bill for the relief of Walterio enforcement people of Cincinnati, Ohio; to By Mr. LANE: Carrasco Mondaca; to the Committee on the H. R. 5290. A bill for the relief of Giuseppe the Committee on Rules. Judiciary. 178. Also, petition of the editor, the Citi­ Barberis; to the Committee on the Judiciary. zen, Honolulu, T. H., relative to a resolution By Mr. MACDONALD: passed by the Citizens Study Club of Oahu, H. R. 5291. A bill for the relief of Mrs. PETITIONS, ETC. T. H., placing themselves on record as re­ Anneliese Martin ( nee Fesslmayer) ; to the Under clause 1 of rule XXII, petitions jecting and opposing communism, fascism, Committee on the Judiciary. and papers were laid on the Clerk's desk and all forms of totalitarianism that are antithetic and inimical to the American By Mr. MORANO: and referred as follows: form of government, and rededicating them• H. R. 5292. A bill for the relief of Sister 176. By the SPEAKER: Petition of the selves to the cause of perpetuating the Amer­ Guiseppina Bucci; to the Committee on the Marine Insurance Society of Seattle, Seattle, ican way of life, etc.; to the Committee on Judiciary. Wash., requesting passage of the Naval Ves- Un-American Activities.

EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS

A National Highway Program stances from members of the American Road President's special committee, ·the report Builders Association. which General Clay presented to the Presi­ So, I say, you have shown us how to write dent only yesterday. I sat in with other EXTENSION OF REMARKS into legislation practical ways to meet the members of the roads committees on a pre• OF ambitions and the needs of the American view of the report last Friday night. people. And it is a privilege to attend your First, then, "Roads at Hand"-the special HON. FRANCIS CASE 53d annual convention in New Orleans, one features of the Federal Highway Act of OF SOUTH DAKOTA of the distinctive cities of America, and one 1954. This is the law under which Fed• eral funds will be available for highway IN THE OF THE of the great cities of the world. The Public Works Committee of the Sen­ programs in the 2 fiscal years of 1956 Monday, March 28, 1955 ate, as Senator DENNIS CHAVEZ, of New Mex­ and 1957, the first of which begins next Mr. CASE of South Dakota. Mr. Pres­ ico, so well said yesterday, is a nonpolitical July 1. · committee. We have had the benefit of great Foremost is the fact that this Act, for ident, I ask unanimous cosnent to have leadership during my membership on that the first time in Federal highway legisla­ printed in the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD an committee. During the first 2 years I was tion, makes available for highway purposes address I made at the 53d annual con­ in the Senate, Senator CHAVEZ, himself, was an amount in dollars substantially equal to vention of the American Road Builders, the chairman of the committee. During the the amount of revenue expected to be col• at New Orleans, La., on January 12, 1955. past 2 years Senator EDWARD MARTIN, of lected in the same period of time from the There being no objection, the address Pennsylvania, has been chairman. They are Federal tax on gasoline and lubricating -was ordered to be printed in the RECORD, both great Americans and they have con­ oils. This does not include the revenue in ducted the deliberations of the committee excise taxes on automobiles or accessories as follows: on a nonpolitical basis. We tried to find out which more nearly compare with the excise ROADS AT HAND AND ROADS AHEAD what America needed in roadbuilding, what taxes on other articles one may purchase. Mr. Chairman, President Reindollar, Presi­ it needed in rivers and harbors development, The total amount provided for the pri• dent-elect Robertson, my colleagues of the and addressed our efforts to that end, regard­ mary, secondary, urban, and interstate sys­ Congress, and ladies and gentlemen, it is a less of any particular political implications tems in this new act was $875 million for privilege to be here to attend the 53d annual that any action might have. Speaking here each year compared with $575 million per convention of this great organization and to in behalf of what is now the minority mem­ year in the prior biennium. That increase participate in its deliberations. we may at bership. of the Senate Committee on Public of $300 million on a $575 million base was a this gathering point out some deficiencies in Works and the Committee on Roads, I want very substantial increase, over 52 percent our highways, we may lament the slowness you to understand that I am sure the tasks in fact. of progress in some respects, we may set our of the coming year will be tackled in the The amount o! $22 ½ million for forest sights on new goals for national achievement, same nonpartisan fashion. In acknowledg­ highways, $24 million for forest roads and but the solid fact is that no other large na­ ing the help you have given in our congres­ trails, $12½ million for roads and trails in tion on the face of the earth today has as sional hearings, I want to express special the national parks, $11 million for park­ many miles of good roads as the United thanks for the factual and informational ways, $10 million for Indian roads and trails, States of America. data submitted by your executive vice presi­ $1 million for public-lands roads, and other The credit for this must go in large meas­ dent, Lt. Gen. Eugene Reybold, at the hear­ amounts for the inter-American highway ure to the enterprise and the resourcefulness ings of the Senate Committee on Public and for research and financing studies lifted of those who comprise the American Road Roads in 1952 and of Bob Reindollar at the the grand total so close to $1 billion that Builders Association. You represent the in­ hearings of the Senate Public Works Sub­ the act was properly characterized by the dividuals and the firms and the research committee on Roads in 1954. I would be re- President, as a billion-dollar road bill, or as institutions · who comprise the American . miss if I did not, speaking to your organiza­ your chairman here this morning perhaps Roadbuilders Association. You who are tion, say "Thank you" to all of you. more accurately describes it, a $2 billion bill here today represent those who have met And I would be remiss, also, if I did not for the biennium. the problems of highway construction and tell you that throughout the congressional We did something else, too, In dealing with licked them. You bring to congressional year, we have been helped by the aids of these roads of Uncle Sam, the roads and hearings the lessons of experience. You your organization. I understand they prefer highways in national forests, national parks, show us how we may write into legislation · to be kept in anonymity but, nevertheless, and national reservations. And these are practical ways to meet the ambitions of the I really would like to mention all of their given a little extra mention, because I think American people. Your chairman, Mr. Steel­ names. These aids of yours are in touch in the general thinking of highway systems man, was overgenerous in his introduction of with the people on Capitol Hill and are we haven't realized the way in which those me. Actually, any contribution that I may always ready to supply us with the latest roads flt into the national system and the have made during the course of legislative · data on highway matters from the construc­ way also in which the roads in our parks and consideration either of the Highway Act of tion standpoint. recreational areas in keeping with the sug­ 1954 or of some prior highway act when My topic for this morning is "Roads at gestion that 50 percent of our traffic is for I was a Member of the House of Representa­ Hand and Roads Ahead." Under the first recreational purposes-those people who are tives and on the Appropriations Committee part of it, I wish briefly to set forth the out for recreational purposes will appreciate · there or as. a member of the Committee on intent of Congress, as nearly as I know it, these recreational features of the highways Public Works and its Subcommittee on in the Federal Highway Act of 1954 with as they drive along, but in many instances Roads before I became chairman during the special reference to some new features in they are headed for one of the national play­ last session-any contributions I may have that legislation. Under the second part of grounds. And so what we do for the high• made have been due to some suggestion that the topic, "Roads Ahead," I shall review in ways in those national playgrounds is im­ I got from somebody else, and in many in- brief detail the recommendations of the portant. Now, for the first time in this act, 3894: CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE March 28 we propose to give the Federal Guvernm~nt Neill emphasized· that 1n his remarks this million to an even $200 million. The Senate itself as good a deal as we have been givmg morning, the roads and the highways of our committee· reported $150 million, six times the states; that is, the right to count on the national recreational grounds have great im­ the previous amount. We settled on the amount of money which the legislative hear­ portance. The American people like to . midway figure of $175 million, a 600-percent ings established was what was needed in a. travel. They head for those playgrounds. increase. proper distribution of highway funds. · They travel thousands and thousands · of At the same time, we provided that the For many years, the biennial highway act miles to get there-and it is important that 11hare of the Federal Government would be has been made the basis for allotment to when they get there they find decent roads 60 percent as against 40 percent for the State the States and has been regarded as a. to travel. All the way that they travel they contribution. Now, that was not with the commitment so that the several State legis­ pay some gasoline-tax revenues, too, and, of thought of reducing the total amount of latures could count on those amounts and course, they create part of the traffic prob­ roads built but rather because we recog­ plan their revenue gathering and allocations lem on the highways in getting there. Your nized the very practical problem that in most accordingly. But, prior to the present, the appreciation of the Tetons in South Yellow­ States the mileage on the interstate system 1lgures for the national forests roads and stone can be marred considerably if you have ls less than the mileage on the other system. trails-not highways but the roads and to bounce around on pitted blacktop. And A great many people live on the other sys­ trails-and for the national parks and the your vision of some spouting geyser is not tems, in the small towns and in the smaller Indian reservations have been only top limit helped by viewing it through a cloud of gravel cities and in the c01,mtry. Each State high­ authorizations and there has been a woeful dust. way authority feels a great deal of pressure lag in the actual appropriations. . The blg increase of funding, however, in to complete their roads, too. When the T~stimony taken in our Senate hearings the 1954 act was the stepup in the Federal­ people see a larger amount per mile put on last spring established that this lag in the 'aid system-from $550 million for the pri­ the segments of the interstate system, which 8 years from 1947 to 1954 for the National mary, secondary, and urban to $700 million frequently are the better roads of the State, Park Service amounted to $70 million-that per year and in the interstate from a simple it makes it difficult for the State highway is, that much was authorized that was not $25 million to $175 million-the two in­ authorities to justify taking the larger appropriated-and almost $20 million for the creases amounting to the $300 million in­ amount that is necessary to meet the stand­ Indian Bureau. We established that appro­ crease on the $575 million base that has ards of construction for the interstate priations for the roads in the national parks been previously mentioned. system and leave somebody"s pet project were running at an average of about $3½ These increases were not accomplished by neglected. And, so, in order to create a million a year against a standing authoriza­ accident. I, personally, had introduced a justification for the State highway authori­ tion in the legislative act of $10 million. bill, S. 2859, a few days before the so-called ties to put some money in the interstate The appropriation for the fiscal year 1951 for administration bill was introduced in the system, we proposed that 60-40 base. Now the National Park Service was $2½ million. House. My bill called for $1 billion, $2 mil­ that principal has been recognized to an That year, the park visitors exceeded 40 mil­ lion for each of the 2 fiscal years as com­ even greater degree in the recommendations lion people but the amount of money was pared with the $887 million in the bill in­ of the President's Advisory Committee. less than it was in the thirties when the troduced and subsequently passed in the This discussion of the interstate system leads visitors were half as many. For fiscal 1953 House of Representatives. directly to the second part of the topic, and 1954 the appropriations for roads in the Now, I think I should say to this associ­ ..Roads Ahead." parks was in the $4 million class against the ation that your spokesmen in their testimony In 1953 I had suggested that we have a $10 mll1ion in authorizations although park before the House and again before the Senate joint congressional study of highway needs visitation the last few years has gone up to said that the lesser amount was not adequate and highway financing. The House commit­ 45 million per year. and I think I should say that your testimony t~e. however, had a study of its own under In this connection we developed some in­ helped to establish the increase which the way. I believe that your organization testi­ teresting figures on maintenance. I sup­ Senate committee reported and which the .fied at its hearings. Some of us felt, however, pose these figures on maintenance might Senate approved. In conference, som~ ad­ that we needed more than a general hearing have other applications, too. But, it was justments were made, but stlil the final total on highway construction, that we needed to costing the National Park Service $1,571 per was close to the billion-dollar figure and have the benefit of detailed study by experts mile to maintain the old south approach justified the statements that Congress was in the field of construction, design, financing road in Yellowstone Park on the old bi­ providing a sum approximating the amount and related subjects; that we needed to con­ tuminous surface against only $202 on the collected in Federal taxes on highway fuels­ sider completing the systems and getting new sections of bituminous. In the Shen­ and that that represents an increase of ap­ caught up with the growing demands. We andoah National Park, maintenance on the proximately 50 percent over the prior bien­ felt we should not merely build today for old bituminous sections was running $1,443 nium. per mile against $163 on the new sections. what we see today but build so that when we Our committee could not ignore the im­ I may have stressed the :figures involved got through with a project or route we would plications of such testimony. We decided more than you expected, but there is a special have met the needs that existed when we that the Federal agencies responsible for significance to them. It is this: that the started and also the needs that had come into maintaining the Government's own property amounts set up in the 1954 Highway Act for being during the period of construction. should have the same assurance to count on primary and ,secondary systems are the So, the Senate wrote into the 1954 act this the figures in the highway act that the amounts which the President's Special Com­ section incorporating the language I sug­ states had" on their partnership roads. So mission headed by General Clay now hr..s gested, to which your chairman has alluded, the Senate committee wrote into section 6 adopted and proposes to use as the base for section 13. I am going to read it-it is not of the 1954 act contract .authority for the those purposes in the new program to be very long: amounts in the bill. The House conferees submitted to the Congress. Had the old base "SEC. 13. The Secretary of Commerce ls au­ concurred in our action. And I might say been continued in the last Congress, it is thorized and directed to .make a comprehen­ that we did the unusual thing of making entirely possible that that would have been sive study of all phases of highway financing, this provision applicable to the authorization the base for the continuing regular primary including a study of the costs of completing of the curr,ent 1955 fiscal year as well as the .and secondary systems in the Clay report. the several systems of highways in the several biennium ahead of 1956 and 1957, so that We set a new mark and that has been used States and of the progress .and feasibility of today the Forest Service for its roads and .as the new base. toll roads with particular attention to the trails fund, the Park Service for its roads and One other feature of the 1954 act before I possible effects of such toll roads upon the trails and parkways, and the Indian Service turn to "Roads Ahead." That is the provi­ Federal-aid highway programs, and coordi­ for lts reservation roads .now have this new sion for the interstate system. The inter­ nation thereof, and to make a report of his authority, and each one !s now engaged in state system and the urban system are, of findings including recommendations with re­ programing roads which will permit them to course, really selected segments of the pri­ spect to Federal participation in toll roads, make real progress in meeting their construc­ mary system. That is from the standpoint to be submitted to the Congre.ss not later tion responsibilities. And, to a group which of physical construction. than February 1, 1955: Provided, That not to represents the road contractors, I suggest The congressional committees were not exceed $100,000 from funds available for ad­ that you let the different ag.encies know that insensible to the many witnesses we had ministrative expenses shall be expended for they now have contract authority to go ahead who urged larger allocations for those highly the purposes of this section." with the amounts described in the highway expensive portions of the primary system­ In his letter yesterday, formally present­ authorization act. the high standard routes of particular im­ ing the report of the Special.Advisory Com­ I have dwelt on this section of the bill a portance in the national defense, often de­ mittee to President Eisenhower, the chair­ bit more, perhaps, than is proportionate to scribed as the strategic network, and the man, Gen. Luciu~ Clay, wrote: "Early 1n the total picture, because it has been a neg­ routes through or m'Ound cities, the urban 1955 the Bureau of Public Roads, pursuant lected one. We did not feature it in our system. Your organization pointed out the to a directive .of Congress (that is, sec. 13), presentation to the Senate, and I doubt that great importance of these roads. So did the will submit a comprehensive report on its many people throughout the industry have representatives of the Association of State current study of highway needs and financ­ been fully aware of the significance· of this Highway Officials, the American Municipal ing._ The estima~es used by this committee establishment of this contract authority on Association, the American Automobile Asso­ (that is, the estimate used by the Clay com­ these minor highway-fund allotments. ciation and many other~. mittee), have been based upon preliminary But, in the long sweep of highway plan­ And the committees responded. The tabulations of data by the Bureau, and hence ning, and I was particularly glad that Mr. House bill proposed stepping up from $25 no major inconsistencies are anticipated." 1955 - CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - HOUSE 3895 In other words, it is anticipated that the tain the level of appropriations established liminary draft of the committee's report and recommendations for roadbuilding in the in the 1954 Highway Act for the regular pri­ from the discussion General Clay had with reports of the Clay committee submitted yes­ mary and secondary aid systems, as well as members of the roads committees last Fri­ terday will flt into the findings of need that $75 million for the continuation of the urban day night. If some of you should have ques­ will be submitted to the Congress in the system and adequate amounts for the public tions and if there is an opportunity for dis­ report of the Bureau of Public Roads under domain lands as well as to provide for the cussion later on, I'll be glad to answer them, · the directive cited. And the fact that the retirement· of bonds in 30 years. if I can-but I think I have told you about Clay committee's recommendations grow out Fifth. The President's Committee further all I know about it. of the estimates of needs and costs made specifically proposes that the Federal High­ But, it is to be remembered that there by the Bureau of Public Roads suggests, I way Corporation reimburse the States for are details that will have to be worked out in think, the degree cf support which the rec­ any segments of the interstate system built congressional hearings-and, as one of the ommendations of the committee will have to acceptable standards since 1947, whether speakers said yesterday, others may propo.se, from governmental sources, at least as to free roads or toll, to the extent of the non­ but, in the final analysis, Congress disposes. goals. · Federal participation; and that this reim­ Personally, I agree with what Senator Now, the President's Advisory Committee's bursement money be available for use by the CHAVEZ and Congressmen FALLON and Mc­ recommendations are buttressed also by their State to huild what might be called lieu GREGOR have already said in suggesting that own hearings in the White House on October roads elsewhere in the State on whatever your roads committees in Congress will give a 7 and 8, 1954, and by the work of the Con­ part of the State's system State law might sympathetic hearing to this proposal or to ference of Governors and their committee provide. any proposal to enable the country to-meet and by studies of an interagency committee This reimbursement money, however, the increasing traffic demands. Deaths of representing the several Cabinet depart­ would be available only if the State was 38,000 per year, many of them avoidable on ments. keeping up its regular matching program on properly designed highways are too many. To the features of the committee's recom­ the other systems. That is, as it was ex­ That is over 100 every day of the -year. And, mendations, I want to give a very brief out­ plained to us, it would not be the intent that of course, the casualties of disabling and line: a State might sit back and say: "We'll take painful accidents are about four times that First, from the data compiled by the Bu­ this money you are going to pay back to us much. We must do all we can to meet the reau under the study directed by section 13 and then ease up on our own appropria­ economic and humanitarian needs of modern of the 1954 act, the. President's Advisory tions." The State would have to keep up its travel. Committee estimates that $101 billion would regular matching program but if it did and I do see, I think, some hurdles that must be required to complete all highway systems, if it had segments of the interstate system be met by the President's Committee. Federal, State, and county and be curre:p.t that were built to acceptable standards, One big hurdle will be to demonstrate at the end of 10 years. I have heard some whether it was a continuation of a part of that the completion of the interstate system discussion and there is some confusion a toll system or a freeway, the State would will not delay or interfere with the building about the set of different figures, $101 bil­ get the reimbursement for that. of the badly needed roads on the primary, lion, $50 billion, $25 billion. The $101 bil­ I might say further in explanation, Gen­ secondary, and urban systems that are not a lion figures is the figure which the commit­ eral Clay pointed out that would not mean part of the designated interstate routes. tee finds would be necessary to complete all the discontinuance of the Federal aid or the There .are two answers likely to be offered the systems and be current at the end of discontinuance of the tolls. His committee to this question: First, that relieving the 10 years. is suggesting that we accept those roads that States of matching on the interstate will re­ Second. The Committee finds that if the are in being if they meet the standards of lease funds for construction of the other present levels of expenditure were continued, the interstate system. systems; second, that the reimbursement for $47 billion of this $101 billion would be pro­ Thus, to treat all alike, the Federal Gov­ funds already-spent will make possible some vided, thus leaving a gap of $54 billion. Now, ernment through this Federal Highway Cor­ "lieu" roads in some neglected sections. that $47 billion would embrace a continua­ poration would stand ready to reimburse the These provisions are very important. In tion of the present Federal-.aid program at States for the acceptable portions of the in­ my State, for instance, we permit refunds the level cited in the 1954 act, plus the State terstate system that it had built to accepta­ of the State gasoline tax to farmers for the and local, plus the existing toll authorities ble standards since 1947, whether toll or portion of their gas that is used off the high­ and whatever other programs are in the pic­ free, and that that money paid for them way-that is, in tractors for plowing, harvest­ ture at the present time. Thus, $47 billion would be available for the State to spend on ing, etc., the nonhighway use. Now, in my of the $101 billion would be provided by building lieu roads. I use the term "lieu State, that happens to amount to 29 percent continuing· the present program but that roads" because out in our State we have what of the revenue we receive in the State gaso­ leaves a gap of $54 billion. The Committee we called lieu land. Sections 16 and 36 in line tax. You know and I know what the would concur in the recommendations of the each township of our State are dedicated as farmers would think about continuing the governors' committee that the Federal Gov­ school lands but there were some sections Federal gas tax at the 2-cent level which is ernment provide 30 percent of this $54 bil­ which were homesteaded and taken up before not refundable in any degree if they thought lion with States and local governments or that provision in the State enabling act was the purpose was only to build a super­ road authorities taking the other 70 percent. adopted. To make up for those, we set aside highway a hundred miles away. Or the resi­ Third. The Clay Committee specifically some other land and called it lieu lands. dents of towns and cities not on the inter­ recommends that the Federal Government Well, these would be lieu roads. In place state route. It will be the job of Congress, take over and complete the presently desig­ of the money that had been spent on the I think, to write the provision for these ·nated national system of interstate high­ interstate system up to date the State would "lieu" roads clearly into the legislation as way system of approximately 38,000 miles at get back this money for building lieu roads. well as to make clear that the funds other­ a cost of $27 billion, of which the Federal That is, would get back the non-Federal por­ wise released from matching on tbe inter­ Government would supply $25 billion and tion of the cost of the portion accepted for state system will be used for completing others $2 billion. In reality, this would be the interstate system. other systems if public acceptance is to be $23 billion

S. 46. An act to further amend the Agricul­ S, 432. An act for the relief of Aniceto HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES tural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, Sparagna; to exempt certain wheat producers from lia­ S. 465. An act for the relief of Ernest Lud­ TUESDAY, MARCH 29, 1955 bility under the act where all the wheat crop wig Bamford and Mrs. Nadine Bamford; is fed or used for seed on the farm, and for S. 466. An act for the relief of Capt. George The House met at 12 o'clock noon. other purposes; Gafos, Eugenia Gafos, and Adamantlos The Chaplain, Rev. Bernard Braskamp; S. 72. An act to provide that certain lands George Gafos; D. D., offered the following prayer: acquired by the United States shall be ad­ S. 471. An act for the relief of Aina Brlzga; Most merciful and gracious God, we ministered by the Secretary of Agiiculture as S. 474. An act foi: the relief of Maria Elena rejoice that Thou art always accessible national forest lands; Venegas and Sarah Lucia Venegas; S. 128. An act for the relief of Francis S. 481. An act for the relief of Gerard and available unto us when we come unto Bertram Brennan; Lucien Dandurand; Thee in humility and with a penitent S. 129. An act for the relief of Mi:roslav S. 503. An act for the relief of Cirino Lan­ and contrite heart. Slovak; zafame; Help us to face the tasks and respon­ . S. 13L An act for the relief of Bohumil S. 585. An act for the relief of Dr. Chang sibilities of this day with the spirit of Suran; Ho Cho; adventure and hope. Make us more im­ S. 143. An act for the relief of Kurt Glaser; S. 599. An act to prohibit the transporta­ pervious to those devastating moods of S. 163. An act for the relief of Philopimin tion of obsc~e matter in interstate or for­ Michalacopoulos ( Mihalakopoulos} ~ fear and worry which so frequently as­ eign commerce; S.167. An act for the relief of Ernesto De­ S. 600. An act to amend title 1S of the sail us and play havoc with our peace. of Leon; United States Code, ,elating to the mailing of mind. S. 195. An act for the relief of Giuseppe obscene matter; · We are daily praying that the life of Minardi; s. 632. An act for the relief of. Jan R. our Republic may be more firmly rooted S. 243. An act for the relief of Szjena Cwiklinski; in the religious ideals and principles of Peison and David Peison; S. 640. An act for the relief of Roger Oul­ S. 244. An act for the relief of Anna C. lette; the Founding Fathers who took God Giese; into account and sought to respect and S. 734. An act to amend title 18, United S. 2.45. An act for the relief of Ahmet Hal­ States Code. section 871, to provide penalties obey His divine law. dun Koca. Task.in; for threats against the President-elect and Grant that we may also continue to S. 246. An act for the relief of Marina the Vice President; pray and labor for the blessedness of an Bernardis Zivolich and Mil'ko Zivolich; S. 735. An act for the relief of SaYah mankind, for our human race is one in S. 271. An act for the relief of June Rose Kabacznik; origin and destiny and must be one in McHenry; S. 323. An act for the relief of Luigi Or­ S. 802. An act to amend the Universal Mili­ a great fellowship of sympathy and lando; tary Training and Serv.iee Act, as amended, service and of brotherhood and good S. 348. An act for the relief of Charlampos to remove the .requirement for a :final physi­ will. Socrates Iossifoglu, Nora Iossifoglu, Helen cal examination for inductees who continue Hear us in Christ's name. Amen. Iossifoglu, and Efrossini Iossifoglu; on active duty in another status in the S. 349. An act for the relief of Aron Klein Armed Forces; The Journal of the proceedings of yes­ and Zita Klein (nee Spielman); S. 804. An act to amend section 201 ( e) of terday was read and approved. S. 350. An act for the relief of Siegfried the Career Compensation Act of 1949, as Rosenzweig; amended, to provide for advance payments S. 351. An act for the relief of Ellen Hen­ of certain pay and allowances of members of MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE riette Buch;· the uniiormed services~ and :for other A message from the Senate, by Mr. S. 352. An act for the relief of Isaac Glick­ purposes; Carrell, one of its clerks, announced that man, Reghina Glickman. Alfred Cisma.ru, and S. 891. An act for the relief of Chokichl the Senate had passed, with amend­ Anna Cismaru; Iraha; ments in which the concurrence of the S. 375. An act for the relief of Alexy W. S. 948. An act to provide transpo1tation House is requested, a concurrent resolu­ Katyll and Ioanna Katyll; on Canadian vessels between ports in south­ S. 378. An act for the relief of Giuseppina eastern Alaska, and between Hyder, Alaska, tion of the House of the following title: Latina Mozzica-to and Giovanni Mozzicato and other points in southeastern Alaska or H. Con. Res. 85. Concurrent r.esolution au­ (John Mozzicato) ; the continental United States, either directly thorizing the printing as a. House document S. 386. An act for the relief of Sandra Lea. or via a foreign port, or for any part of the the pam.phlet, Our American Government, MacMullin; transportation; What Is It? How Does It Function? S. 394. An act for the relief of AU Hassan S. 1021. An act for the relief of Leo A. Rl­ The message also announced that the Waffa;· · bitzki, Mrs. Charlotte Ribitzki, and Marion Senate had passed bills and a concurrent S. 409. An act for the relle! o! Inge Karup; A. Ribitzki; S. '412:. An act for the relief of Jan Hajdu­ S. 1166. An act to amend section 6 of the resolution of the following· titles. in kiewicz; act of August 30, 1890, as amended, and which the concurrence o! the House is S. 416. An act for the relief of. Anastasia. section 2 of the act of February 2, 1903, as requested: Alexiadou; amended; S. 39. An act for the relief of Stanislavas S. 429. An act for the relief of Franciszek S. 1167. An act to amend the Soil Conser­ Racinskas (Stacys Racinskas); Janicki and his wife Stefania Janicki; vation and Domestic Allotment Act; and