Selected Bibliography
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Behind the Veil in Ireland
Tlhe 1 i Ford. international Weekly J THE BlAUB DM I M DEPEMBENT a' $1.50 igj Dearborn, Michigan, July 16, 1921 fen Cents Behind the Veil in Ireland is the bra in center lieve from what they Irish movement. I By told me that DUBLIN ALEXANDER IRVINE Sinn Fein and the I. R. A. over there a few are in solid agreement as to weeks ago to find out what men the present The Irish question is every editor's nightmare. Nothing was ever written methods. There are a considerable were thinking about. What they about it which to bring failed denunciation from one side or the other. Alex. number of Irish people who de- do is the result of what they think. Irvine, Irish by birth, American by choice, went over to see he could if see it plore and stand out against mur- 1 was born in Ireland but I found steadily and see it whole. Here is his report. Irvine is a good observer and an honest man. No editor can hope more. der but at present they have mvself looking at the situation for no voice in the matter. through the eyes of an American. The man who was described My sympathies were with the to Home Rule movement and what I me by Sir Horace Plunkett as "the greatest living Irishman" is saw confirmed my the sympathies in that direction. I had some ideas poet and dreamer George W. Russell ("A. He is about violence as E."). against the a political weapon and they were strengthened in policy of violence, so is Sir Horace. -
The Circassian: a Life of Esref Bey, Late Ottoman Insurgent and Special Agent
The Circassian: A Life of Esref Bey, Late Ottoman Insurgent and Special Agent By Benjamin C. Fortna London: Hurst Publishers, 2016, 341 pages, £25.00, ISBN: 9781849045780. Reviewed by İrem Gündüz-Polat, İstanbul Şehir University Kuşçubaşızade Eşref (d. 1964) is as a traitor to his country because probably one of the most com- he did not follow the orders of Mus- plicated and elusive figures in the tafa Kemal and the new parliament transformation period spanning in Ankara. These two extremes are the end of the Ottoman Empire and due in part to the paucity of infor- the beginning of the Republic of mation about and misinterpreta- Turkey. Today, he has a controver- tions of his missions and the Special sial reputation within the country. Organization (Teşkilat-ı Mahsusa) Some view him as a heroic figure for of which he was a part. In his new his pan-Islamist and pan-Turkic operations book, The Circassian: A Life of Esref Bey, Late to save the Ottoman state. Others view him Ottoman Insurgent and Special Agent, Benja- 2017 Summer 265 BOOK REVIEWS min Fortna considers the controversy about ment of gold for the Ottoman army. During Eşref’s life misleading; he therefore tries to this mission, Eşref was ambushed, captured, objectively describe and contextualize Bey’s and sent to Cairo. Chapter seven describes story. Fortna contributes not only to Eşref’s Eşref’s brief internment in the British pris- biography, but also to current knowledge con- oner-of-war camp at Malta. Upon Eşref’s re- cerning the groundbreaking events and insti- turn to Anatolia, Mustafa Kemal tasked him tutions of the first decades of the twentieth to raise local Circassian leaders against the century. -
2019 Clan Gathering Itinerary
2019 CLAN GATHERING ITINERARY Friday 13th September 16:00 PROMPTLY COACH DEPARTS FROM ROCHESTOWN HOTEL TO CASTLE HOTEL IN MACROOM WITH CROWLEYS RESIDING THERE. If ROCHESTOWN residents wish, they may drive themselves to Macroom and take the coach back, leaving their cars at the Castle Hotel 14:00 - 18:00 Registration at Castle Hotel in Macroom Note: FOOD ON YOUR OWN AT CASTLE HOTEL IS AVAILABLE ALL EVENING. 18:00 - 20:00 Cheese and Wine Reception at Castle Hotel followed by welcoming Ceremony 20:00 – 22:00 Castle Hotel with Dick Beamish, Guest entertainer followed by Irish Dancing Demonstration, concluding with an evening of Irish music by our own Larry Crowley and Kevin. COACH WILL RETURN TO ROCHESTOWN HOTEL ABOUT 12:30 AM IRISH TIME!! Saturday 14th September 9:00 PROMPTLY COACH DEPARTS FROM ROCHESTOWN HOTEL TO CASTLE HOTEL IN MACROOM WITH CROWLEYS RESIDING THERE. 9:30 - 10:30 Business Meeting and Website Information Meeting at CASTLE HOTEL 11:00 Departing on Buses from CASTLE HOTEL FOR TOURING. 11:30 Stop off at Kilmichael Ambush. Address by Local Historian. The Kilmichael Ambush was an ambush near the village of Kilmichael in County Cork on 28 November 1920 carried out by the Irish Republican Army (IRA) during the Irish War of Independence. Thirty-six local IRA volunteers commanded by Tom Barry killed seventeen members of the Royal Irish Constabulary's Auxiliary Division. The Kilmichael ambush was politically as well as militarily significant. It occurred one week after Bloody Sunday, marking an escalation in the IRA's campaign. 12:30 - 13:30 Visit to Barrett’s Bar in Coppeen for Drinks and Sandwiches 14:30 Mass at O’ Crowley Castle 16:30 Returning to CASTLE AND ROCHESTOWN HOTELS. -
Essays in History}
3/31/2021 The Black and Tans: British Police and Auxiliaries in the Irish War of Independence, 1920-1921 — {essays in history} {essays in history} The Annual Journal produced by the Corcoran Department of History at the University of Virginia The Black and Tans: British Police and Auxiliaries in the Irish War of Independence, 1920-1921 Volume 45 (2012) Reviewed Work(s) www.essaysinhistory.net/the-black-and-tans-british-police-and-auxiliaries-in-the-irish-war-of-independence-1920-1921/ 1/5 3/31/2021 The Black and Tans: British Police and Auxiliaries in the Irish War of Independence, 1920-1921 — {essays in history} The Black and Tans: British Police and Auxiliaries in the Irish War of Independence, 1920-1921. By David Leeson (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011). Pp. 294. Hardcover, $52.98. Scholars have included the Irish War of Independence in their appraisals of modern Irish history since the war ended in the early 1920s. David M. Leeson, a historian at Laurentian University, examines the less discussed units of the Royal Irish Constabulary (RIC) — that is the Black and Tans and the Auxiliary Division (ADRIC) — in a well-integrated mix of political and military history. In his book, the author aims to debunk the myths established by the Irish Republicans that still surround the history of the Black and Tans: for example, the notion that they were all ex- criminals and “down-and-outs.” Leeson takes a less conventional approach to the subject by arguing that it was “not character but circumstance” that caused the Black and Tans as well as the Auxiliary Division to take the law into their own hands (69). -
Colonialism, Colonization, and Land Law in Mandate Palestine: the Zor Al-Zarqa and Barrat Qisarya Land Disputes in Historical Perspective
Theoretical Inquiries in Law 4.2 (2003) Colonialism, Colonization, and Land Law in Mandate Palestine: The Zor al-Zarqa and Barrat Qisarya Land Disputes in Historical Perspective Geremy Forman & Alexandre Kedar* This articlefocuses on land rights, land law, and land administration within a multilayered colonial setting by examining a major land dispute in British-ruled Palestine (1917-1948). Our research reveals that the Mandate legal system extinguished indigenous rights to much land in the Zor al-Zarqa and Barrat Qisarya regions through its use of "colonial law"- the interpretation of Ottoman law by colonial officials, the use of foreign legal concepts, and the transformation of Ottoman law through supplementary legislation.However the colonial legal system was also the site of local resistance by some Palestinian Arabs attempting to remain on their land in the face of the pressure of the Mandate authorities and Jewish colonization officials. This article sheds light on the dynamics of the Mandate legal system and colonial law in the realm of land tenure relations.It also suggests that the joint efforts of Mandate and Jewish colonization officials to appropriate Geremy Forman is a Ph.D. candidate in the University of Haifa's Department of Land of Israel Studies. Alexandre (Sandy) Kedar is a Lecturer in the University of Haifa's Faculty of Law. Names of authors by alphabetical order. We would like to thank Oren Yiftachel for his contribution to this article and Michael Fischbach for his insightful remarks and suggestions. We are also grateful to Assaf Likhovsky for his feedback and constructive criticism, to Anat Fainstein for her research assistance, and to Dana Rothman of Theoretical Inquiries in Law for her expert editorial advice. -
Israel's Rights As a Nation-State in International Diplomacy
Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs Institute for Research and Policy המרכז הירושלמי לענייני ציבור ומדינה )ע"ר( ISRAEl’s RiGHTS as a Nation-State in International Diplomacy Israel’s Rights as a Nation-State in International Diplomacy © 2011 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs – World Jewish Congress Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 13 Tel Hai Street, Jerusalem, Israel Tel. 972-2-561-9281 Fax. 972-2-561-9112 Email: [email protected] www.jcpa.org World Jewish Congress 9A Diskin Street, 5th Floor Kiryat Wolfson, Jerusalem 96440 Phone : +972 2 633 3000 Fax: +972 2 659 8100 Email: [email protected] www.worldjewishcongress.com Academic Editor: Ambassador Alan Baker Production Director: Ahuva Volk Graphic Design: Studio Rami & Jaki • www.ramijaki.co.il Cover Photos: Results from the United Nations vote, with signatures, November 29, 1947 (Israel State Archive) UN General Assembly Proclaims Establishment of the State of Israel, November 29, 1947 (Israel National Photo Collection) ISBN: 978-965-218-100-8 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction and Overview Ambassador Alan Baker .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 The National Rights of Jews Professor Ruth Gavison ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9 “An Overwhelmingly Jewish State” - From the Balfour Declaration to the Palestine Mandate -
British Security Policy in Ireland, 1920-1921: a Desperate Attempt by the Crown to Maintain Anglo-Irish Unity by Force
British Security Policy in Ireland, 1920-1921: A Desperate Attempt by the Crown to Maintain Anglo-Irish Unity by Force ‘What we are trying to do is to stop the campaign of assassination and arson, initiated and carried on by Sinn Fein, with as little disturbance as possible to people who are and who wish to be law abiding.’ General Sir Nevil Macready ‘outlining the British policy in Ireland’ to American newspaper correspondent, Carl W. Ackerman, on 2 April 1921.1 In the aftermath of victory in the Great War (1914-1918) and the conclusion to the peacemaking process at Versailles in 1919, the British Empire found itself in a situation of ‘imperial overstretch’, as indicated by the ever-increasing demands for Crown forces to represent and maintain British interests in defeated Germany, the Baltic and Black Seas regions, the Middle East, India and elsewhere around the world. The strongest and most persistent demand in this regard came from Ireland – officially an integral part of the United Kingdom itself since the Act of Union came into effect from 1 January 1801 – where the forces of militant Irish nationalism were proving difficult, if not impossible to control. Initially, Britain’s response was to allow the civil authorities in Ireland, based at Dublin Castle and heavily reliant on the enforcement powers of the Royal Irish Constabulary (RIC), to deal with this situation. In 1920, however, with a demoralised administration in Ireland perceived to be lacking resolution in the increasingly violent struggle against the nationalists, London -
WIRELESS and EMPIRE AMBITION Wireless Telegraphy/Telephony And
WIRELESS AND EMPIRE AMBITION Wireless telegraphy/telephony and radio broadcasting in the British Solomon Islands Protectorate, South-West Pacific (1914-1947): political, social and developmental perspectives Martin Lindsay Hadlow Master of Arts in Mass Communications, University of Leicester, 2003 Honorary Doctorate, Kazakh State National University (named after Al-Farabi), 1997 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2016 School of Communication and Arts Abstract This thesis explores the establishment of wireless technology (telegraphy, telephony and broadcasting) in the British Solomon Islands Protectorate (BSIP), South-West Pacific and analyses its application as a political, social and cultural tool during the colonial years spanning the first half of the 20th century. While wireless seemed a ready-made technology for the Pacific, given its capability as a medium to transmit and receive signals instantly across vast expanses of ocean, the colonial civil servants of Britain’s Fiji-based regional headquarters, the Western Pacific High Commission (WPHC) in Suva, were slow to understand its strategic value. Conservative attitudes to governance, combined with a confidence born of Imperial rule, not to mention bureaucratic inertia and an almost complete lack of understanding of the new medium by a reluctant administration, aligned to cause obfuscation, delay and frustration. In the British Solomon Islands Protectorate, one of the most geographically remote ‘fragments of Empire’, pressures from the commercial sector (primarily planters and traders), the religious community (mission stations in remote locations), keen amateur experimenters (expatriate businessmen), wireless sales companies (Marconi and AWA Ltd.), not to mention the declaration of World War I itself, all intervened to bring about change to the stultified regulatory environment then pertaining and to ensure the introduction of wireless technology in its multitude of iterations. -
Then with the Civilian Administration up Until Britain Lence And
AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF MichaelA.Earl-Taylor for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in History, Anthropology and English presented on May 30, 1989. Title:British Policies Towards Palestine 1917-1922. q. Abstract approved: ?A Ku Phi This study traces British government policies with regard to Palestine from the time the British Expedition- ary Forces under General Allenbyinvested Jerusalem in December 1917 to the imposition of the Mandatewith Britain as the Mandatory power, which came into effect on July 22,1922. The first chapter provides an historical introduction and examines the sequence of events leading to the Balfour Declaration of November 1917. The subsequent chapters deal with British policies during the MilitaryAdministration,which lasted from 1917-1920, and then with the Civilian Administration up until Britain formally assumed the Mandate of the Covenant ofthe League of Nations. Perhaps no policies ever pursued by successive British governments have been more fraught with ambiva- lence and contradiction than those of the Palestine mandate.British interests were defined not only by moral concerns with regard to the position of the Jewish people, but strategic considerations of Palestine and its geo- graphic location as a buffer zone to the lifeline of the empire--the Suez Canal.In this respect, the government of India, the source of the British military power in the Near East exerted as much, and sometimes more, influence over British Middle East policy as theForeign Office, and later, the Colonial Office combined. The inclusion of the Balfour Declaration in the Man- date placed the British government in an extraordinary and difficultposition. -
The Kilmichael Ambush - a Review of Background, Controversies and Effects
The Kilmichael Ambush - A Review of Background, Controversies and Effects (Seamus Fox – September 2005) On the cold wintry evening of Sunday 28th November 1920, two Crossley tenders, each with nine cadets of the Auxiliary Division of the RIC on board, were travelling from their base in Macroom towards Dunmanway when they were ambushed about 1.5 miles south of the village of Kilmichael, Co Cork by the Flying Column of the 3rd (West) Cork Brigade of the IRA, led by Column Commander Tom Barry. While a number of details remain unclear and many others are disputed, what is clear and undisputed is that by the end of the ambush, nineteen men lay dead. Sixteen of the dead were Auxiliaries and three were IRA men. (For the casualties and details of the personnel – both Auxiliary and IRA involved, see Appendix. Also given in the Appendix is the disposition of the ambushers – the disposition assumes importance when the controversies that arose from the Kilmichael ambush are discussed below.) This essay will look at (1) The background to the ambush (2) The controversies that arose from the ambush and (3) The effects of the ambush. 1.0 Background The Auxiliaries1 arrived in the town of Macroom in early September 1920 (Twohig 1994, pg 126). According to Hart, they arrived in a "district whose police chief declared it to be 'practically in a state of war'. … Almost all the outlying police barracks had been evacuated and burned down … The [British] army had stepped in in May [1920] to try to restore order and found itself embroiled in a vicious little war in the Muskerry hill country west of the town with the Ballyvourney I.R.A. -
Colonialism, Maasina Rule, and the Origins of Malaitan Kastom
Colonialism, Maasina Rule, and the Origins of Malaitan Kastom Pacific Islands Monograph Series 26 Colonialism, Maasina Rule, and the Origins of Malaitan Kastom David W. Akin Center for Pacific Islands Studies School of Pacific and Asian Studies University of Hawai‘i, Mānoa University of Hawai‘i Press • Honolulu © 2013 University of Hawai‘i Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 18 17 16 15 14 13 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Akin, David, [date–] author. Colonialism, Maasina rule, and the origins of Malaitan kastom / David Akin. pages cm. — (Pacific islands monograph series ; 26) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8248-3814-0 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Malaita Province (Solomon Islands)—Politics and government. 2. Malaita Province (Solomon Islands)—Social life and customs. 3. Self-determination, National—Solomon Islands. I. Title. II. Series: Pacific islands monograph series ; no. 26. DU850.A684 2013 995.93’7—dc23 2013008708 Maps by Manoa Mapworks, Inc. University of Hawai‘i Press books are printed on acid-free paper and meet the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Council on Library Resources. Design by University of Hawai‘i Press Design & Production Department Printed by Sheridan Books, Inc. To Ma‘aanamae, Sulafanamae, and Saetana ‘Ola moru siria lo‘oo, fu‘u wane. and Kisini CENTER FOR PACIFIC ISLANDS STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I Terence Wesley-Smith, Director PACIFIC ISLANDS MONOGRAPH SERIES Tarcisius Kabutaulaka, General Editor Jan Rensel, Managing Editor EDITORIAL BOARD Hokulani Aikau Alex Golub David Hanlon Robert C Kiste Jane Freeman Moulin Puakea Nogelmeier Lola Quan Bautista Ty Kāwika Tengan The Pacific Islands Monograph Series is a joint effort of the University of Hawai‘i Press and the Center for Pacific Islands Studies, University of Hawai‘i. -
Kilmichael Ambush Relatives Speak
IRISH WAR OF INDEPENDENCE 1920-2020 Veteran’s relatives on the 28 November 1920 Kilmichael Ambush History Ireland discussion of Peter Hart’s claims in The IRA and its Enemies on an Auxiliary ‘false surrender’ and about ambush commander Tom Barry Relatives of IRA veterans Maureen Deasy - daughter of Liam Deasy Seán Kelleher - son of Tom Kelleher Maura O’Donovan - daughter of Pat O’Donovan John Young - son of Ned Young plus historians Níall Meehan Eve Morrison Pádraig Óg Ó Ruairc Compiled by THE AUBANE HISTORICAL SOCIETY 2 The Kilmichael Ambush of 28 November 1920 A 2012 History Ireland discussion with historians, relatives of Kilmichael Ambush participants and of IRA veterans Maureen Deasy (daughter of IRA veteran Liam Deasy, brother of Kilmichael Ambush casualty Pat Deasy); Sean Kelleher (son of IRA veteran Tom Kelleher); Maura O’Donovan (daughter of Kilmichael Ambush veteran Pat O’Donovan); Marion O’Driscoll (wife of solicitor Jim O’Driscoll; John Young (son of Kilmichael Ambush veteran Ned Young); plus historians Niall Meehan, Eve Morrison, Pádraig Óg Ó Ruairc Plus, two appendices, statement by John Young (son of Ned Young) and Sunday Times report of statement Review History Ireland, Issue 3 Volume 20 (May/June 2012) fascinating breakdown of the number of military and civilian deaths Terror in Ireland 1916–1923, David Fitzpatrick (ed.), (Lilliput Press/Trinity that occurred during the conflict. History Workshop, €15) The book is dedicated to the late Peter Hart and addresses some of The provocative title of this book immediately challenges readers to the most controversial and important aspects of his work, including think about what they consider terror to be, and what defines a the Kilmichael ambush, the execution of alleged spies by the IRA’s terrorist.