DOCSLIB.ORG

OF CICERO's Works, 1498–17241

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OF CICERO's Works, 1498–17241 APPENDIX A CATALOGUE OF THE COMPLETE EDITIONS 1 OF CICERO’S WORKS, 1498–1724 Minutianus (1498) Marci Tulllii Ciceronis Opera Omnia (Milan: Gulielmi le Signerre, 1498). Format: Folio; 4 v. Editor: Alexander Minutianus (Alessandro Minuziano, late C15—early C16). Ascensius (1511) Opera Rhetorica, Oratoria et Forensia (Paris: Ascensius, 1511); Orationes et De Petitione Consulatus (Paris: Ascensius, 1511); Opera Epistolica (Paris: Ascensius, 1511); Opera Philosophica (Paris: Ascensius, 1511). Format: Folio; 4 v. Editors: Jodocus Badius Ascensius (Josse Bade, 1462–1535); Gerardus Vercellanus (Gerardus von Vercelli, 1480–1544). Aldus (1523) Epistolae Familiares (Venice: Aldine Press, 1502); Epistolarum ad Atticum, ad Brutum, ad Quintum fratrem, libri XX. Latina interpretatio eorum, quae in ipsis epistolis graece scripta sunt (Venice: Aldine Press, 1513); 1 Date range from the frst Opera Omnia edition in 1498, to the frst to appear after the publication of Cicero Illustratus. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 231 K.A. East, The Radicalization of Cicero, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-49757-0 232 APPENDIX A: CATALOGUE OF THE COMPLETE EDITIONS OF CICERO’S … Rhetorica (Venice: Aldine Press, 1514); Orationes (Venice: Aldine Press, 1519); De Philosophia (Venice: Aldine Press, 1523). Format: Octavo; 9 v. Editors: Aldus Manutius (Aldo Manuzio, 1449–1515—Franciscus Asulanus oversaw production after 1515); Andreas Naugerius (Andreas Navagero, 1483–1529). Ascensius (1522) Opera Philosophica (Paris: Ascensius, 1521); Orationes diligentius recog- nitae, et aptiore serie repositae (Paris: Ascensius, 1521); Opera Rhetorica, Oratoria, et Forensia (Paris: Ascensius, 1521); Opera Epistolica (Paris: Ascensius, 1522). Format: Folio; 4 v. Editors: As Ascensius (1511). Cratander (1528) Marci Tullii Ciceronis Omnia, quae in hunc usque diem extare putantur opera, in tres secta Tomos, et ad variorum, vetustissimorumque codicum fdem diligentissime recognita, ac ultra omnes hactenus visas aeditiones locis aliquot locupletata. Ad haec M. Tullii Ciceronis vita, ex Plutarcho, & T. Liuio. Cn. Pomponii Attici vita, per Cornelium nepotem. Annotationes in aliquot Ciceronis locos ex clarissimorum virorum lucubrationibus depromp- tae. Index omnium quae hisce tribus Ciceronianorum librorum tomis haben- tur notatu dignorum (Basel: Andreas Cratander [d. 1540], 1528). Format: Folio; 2 v. Editor: Michael Bentinus (Michaële Bentino, d. 1527). Hervagius (1534) Marci Tullii Ciceronis opera quae aedita sunt hactenus omnia in tomes dis- tincta quattuor, ad diversorum et vetustissimorum Codicum collationem ingenti cura recognita multisque locis ultra superiores aeditiones restitutis (Basel: Johannes Hervagius [Johann Herwagen, 1497–1558], 1534). Format: Folio; 4 v. Editor: Joachim Camerarius (1500–1574). Victorius (1534) Marci Tullii Ciceronis opera omnium quae hactenus excusa sunt, casti- gatissima nunc primum in lucem edita (Venice: L. A. Junta, 1534–1537). Format: Folio; 4 v. APPENDIX A: CATALOGUE OF THE COMPLETE EDITIONS OF CICERO’S … 233 Editors: Petrus Victorius (Piero Vettori, 1499–1585); Andreas Naugerius. Stephanus (1538) M. T. Ciceronis Opera. Ex Petri Victorii codicibus maxima ex parte descripta, viri docti et in recensendis authoris huius scriptis cauti & perdili- gentis: quem nos industria, quanta potuimus, consequuti, quasdam orationes redintegratas, tres libros de legibvs multo quam antea meliores, & reliquias de commentariis qui de repvblica inscripti erant, magno labore collectas vndique, descriptasque libris, vobis exhibemus. eivsdem Victorii explicationes suarum in Ciceronem castigationum. Index rervm et verborvm (Paris: Robertus Stephanus [Robert Estienne, 1503–1559], 1538–1539). Format: Folio; 4 v. Editor: Petrus Victorius. Camerarius (1540) Opera Marci Tullii Ciceronis quotquot ab interitu vindicari summorum virorum industria potuerunt cum veterum exemplarium, tum recentiorum collatione restituta. Ex recognitione Ioachimi Camerarii Pabergensis elabo- rata: cuius et locorum aliquot praecipuorum annotationes subiunguntur (Basel: Hervagius, 1540). Format: Folio; 4 v. Editor: Joachim Camerarius. Gryphius (1540) Marci Tullii Ciceronis opera ex Petri Victorii castigationibus. Hic accesse- runt castigationum eiusdem Victorii explicationes ac Ioach. Camerarii anno- tationes (Lyon: Sebastian Gryphius (Sébastien Gryphe, c. 1492–1556), 1540). Format: Octavo; 9 v. Editor: Johannes Michael Brutus (Giovanni Michele Bruto, 1517–1592). Manutius (1540) Epistolae ad Familiares diligentius, quam quae hactenus exierunt, emen- datae. Pauli Manutii Scholia, quibus et loci familiarum epistolarum obscuriores explanantur, et castigationum, quae in iisdem epistolis factae sunt, ratio redditur (Venice: Aldine Press, 1540); Epistolae ad Atticum, ad M. Brutum, ad Q. fratrem (Venice: Aldine Press, 1540); Philosophia (Venice: Aldine Press, 1541); Rhetorica, corrigente Paulo Manutio (Venice: Aldine Press, 1546); Orationes (Venice: Aldine Press, 1546). 234 APPENDIX A: CATALOGUE OF THE COMPLETE EDITIONS OF CICERO’S … Format: Octavo; 10 v. Editor: Paulus Manutius (Paolo Manuzio, 1512–1574). Sturm (1540) M. Tullii Ciceronis editio post Naugerianam et Victorianam emendata a Io. Sturmio (Strasbourg: Wendelinus Rihelius [Wendelin Rihel, 1490–1555], 1540). Format: Quarto; 9 v. Editor: Johannes Sturm (Ioannes Sturmius, 1507–1589). Stephanus (1543) M. Tullii Ciceronis Opera (Paris: Robertus Stephanus, 1543–1544). Format: Octavo; 9 v. Editors: Petrus Victorius; Paulus Manutius. Colinaeus (1543) M. Tullii Ciceronis Opera (Paris: Colinaeus [Simon de Colines, c. 1480– c. 1546], 1543–1547). Format: Sextodecimo; 10 v. Editor: Petrus Victorius. Gryphius (1546) Marcus Tullii Ciceronis Opera (Lyon: Sebastian Gryphius, 1546–1551). Format: Sextodecimo; 9 v. Editor: Johannes Michael Brutus. Stephanus (1555) Opera M. Tullii Ciceronis (Paris: Carolus Stephanus [Charles Estienne, 1504–1564], 1555). Format: Folio; 4 v. Editor: Paulus Manutius. Boulier (1560) M. Tullii Ciceronis Opera. Accessere Petri Victorii castigationes, harum explicationes: Paulique Manutii, et Ioachimi Camerarii, atque Hieronymi Ferrarii Adnotamenta. Omnia quidem studio Ioannis Bouilierii emendata (Lyon: Jean Frellon [Frellonius, 1517–1568], 1560–1568). Format: Duodecimo; 10 v. Editor: Jean Boulier (Johannes Boulierius). APPENDIX A: CATALOGUE OF THE COMPLETE EDITIONS OF CICERO’S … 235 Lambinus (1566) Marci Tullii Ciceronis Opera Omnia. Quae exstant, a Dionysio Lambino Monstroliensi ex codicibus manuscriptis emendata, & aucta: Quorum ordi- nem & numerum altera pagina indicabit. Eiusdem D. Lambini annota- tiones, seu emendationum rationes singulis Tomis distinctae. Index rerum et verborum memoria digniorum copiosus & locuples, singulis Tomis adiec- tus. Et fragmentae omniae, quae exstant, a viris doctis non ita pridem undique collecta (Paris: Jacques du Puys [1540–1589], 1566). Format: Folio; 4 v. Editor: Dionysius Lambinus (Denis Lambin, 1520–1572). Gryphius (1570) M. Tullii Ciceronis opera a Ioan. Michaele Bruto emendata. Accesserunt breves animadversiones ex doctissimorum hominum commentariis, quibus ita loci permulti explicantur, ut vulgo receptae lectionis ubique ratio habeatur (Lyon: Antonius Gryphius [Antoine Gryphe, 1570–1571], 1570–1571). Format: Sextodecimo; 11 v. Editor: Johannes Michael Brutus. Ursinus (1584) Opera omnia quae exstant, a Dionysio Lambino Monstroliensi ex codicibus manuscriptis emendata. Eiusdem Dioysii Lambini Annotationes seu emen- dationum rationes postremae. Fulvii Ursini Romani Notae. Fragmenta omnia Ciceroniana a Lambino et aliis collecta: Consolatio, Ciceronis a nonnullis adscripta. Indices longe omnium copiosissimi. Postremo, ut facil- ius et commodius haec editio ad Nizoli Thesaurum referri possit, margini appositi sunt numeri, quibus huius editionis cum vetere Aldina consensus hac in parte reperiatur (Geneva: Jérémie des Planches, 1584). Format: Folio; 2 v. Editor: Fulvius Ursinus (Fulvio Orsini, 1529–1600). Gothofredus (1588) M. Tullii Ciceronis Opera Omnia. Praeter hactenus vulgatam Dionysij Lambini editionem, accesserunt D. Gothofredi I. C. Notae: in queis Variae lectiones prope infnitae: Synopses generales et speciales singulis vel libris vel paginis adiectae: Ciceronis loca praecipuae et diffciliora, inter se primo, alijs deinde authoribus, Grammaticis, Rhetoribus Poetis, Historicis, Iurisconsultis maxime collata: vt et Formulae quae ad ius, leges, senatus consulta et actiones pertinet explicatae (Lyon: Sybille a Porta, 1588). 236 APPENDIX A: CATALOGUE OF THE COMPLETE EDITIONS OF CICERO’S … Format: Quarto; 4 v. Editor: Dionysius Gothofredus (Denis Godefroy, 1549–1622). Scot (1588) M. Tullii Ciceronis opera omnia variis Dion. Lambini et aliorum doctis- simorum quorumque virorum Lectionibus opera Alex. Scot, Scoti, ad mar- ginem illustrata et in sectiones Apparatui Latinae locutionis respondentia. Acc. D. Lambini et F. Ursini emendationum rationes singulis tomis dis- tinctae (Lyon: Jean Pillehotte [d. 1612], 1588). Format: Duodecimo; 9 v. Editor: Alexander Scot. Gruterus (1618) M. Tullii Ciceronis opera omnia quae exstant. Ex sola fere Codd. Mss. fde emendata studio atque industria Jani Gulielmii et Jani Gruteri (Hamburg: Johannes Frobenius [Johann Froben, c. 1460–1527], 1618). Format: Folio; 4 v. Editors: Janus Gruterus (Jan Gruter, 1560–1627); Janus Gulielmius (Jan Wilhelms, 1555–1584). Elzevir (1642) M. Tullii Ciceronis opera cum optimis exemplaribus accurate collata (Leiden: Elzevir, 1642). Format: Duodecimo; 10 v. Editor: Janus Gruterus. Blaeu (1658) M. Tullii Ciceronis Opera (Amsterdam:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historians in Recent Histories of Historiography
    The Historical Journal, , (), pp. – © Cambridge University Press doi:./SX REPUBLICANS OF LETTERS, MEMORY POLITICIANS, GLOBAL COLONIALISTS: HISTORIANS IN RECENT HISTORIES OF HISTORIOGRAPHY CASPAR HIRSCHI Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Zürich ABSTRACT. Writing the history of historiography is a tricky business. There is no unbiased way of doing it, and it can serve different goals that at best complement and at worst contradict each other. The genre can seem both suitable to promote one’s own academic agenda and to reflect upon one’s own ideological constraints, epistemological presumptions, and social aspirations. This article analyses the motivations and methods of recent authors in the field, and it does so principally by focusing on the roles they attribute to historians past and present. To enable comparisons, the article includes works with a national, European and global framework, on early modern and late modern historiography, by intellectual, cultural and post-colonialist historians. A general conclusion will be that while most publications use the genre to pursue academic interests with epistemic arguments, only few try to exploit its potential for critical self-reflexion. As a consequence, they tend to be of limited credibility and originality when it comes to describing historiography’s functions and historians’ roles. This article does not treat their lack of critical commitment as an isolated phenomenon in a historiographical sub-field, but as a symptom of a larger problem within academic scholarship today. There are, however, exceptions to the rule, and this article will also try to work out their particular strengths. In the early days of book reviewing, critics were busy looking for a solution to a problem that the new genre brought with it: how to expose published errors without soiling their authors’ name.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Orationes De Denis Lambin. La Défense Du Grec Dans L
    Astrid QUILLIEN LES ORATIONES DE DENIS LAMBIN LA DEFENSE DU GREC DANS L’ ORATIO DE UTILITATE LINGUAE GRAECAE ET RECTA GRAECORUM LATINE INTERPRETANDORUM RATIONE (22 octobre 1571) INTRODUCTION Tout comme Josse Bade, Marc-Antoine Muret ou Nicolas Bérault, Denis Lambin 1 eut, lui aussi, un rôle important à jouer dans la transmission des Classiques. Mais ce grand humaniste, Lecteur et Traducteur Royal de latin puis de grec dans les années 1560 et au début des années 1570, présente des méthodes de travail, une idéologie différentes de ses prédécesseurs. Une comparaison du commentaire de Denis Lambin sur l’ Art poétique d’Horace (1561) 2 avec celui de Josse Bade (1500), m’avait permis de montrer que le commentaire de Lambin était plus systématique et scientifique, en raison d’une différence d’auditoire, mais aussi d’époque 3. Pour ce qui est des praelectiones de Lambin, de ses leçons inaugurales au Collège Royal, il apparaît que l’époque, son caractère, son statut, le milieu auquel il appartient et l’auditoire auquel il s’adresse conditionnent sa rhétorique, sa pédagogie, son attitude, ses arguments. L’ Oratio De Utilitate , prononcée le 22 octobre 1571 4, représente le dernier discours prononcé par Lambin au Collège Royal avant sa mort. Comme certains prédécesseurs (Politien, Bérault 5), le Lecteur Royal ne respecte pas la forme traditionnelle, médiévale, de la praelectio , qui visait surtout à présenter l’auteur et l’œuvre étudiés, mais il l’adapte à ses préoccupations, à son époque, à sa personnalité. Ainsi, il y met en scène un ethos 1 Denis Lambin est né à Montreuil-sur-Mer (Pas-de-Calais) en 1519.
    [Show full text]
  • Newton.Indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 14:45 | Pag
    omslag Newton.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 14:45 | Pag. 1 e Dutch Republic proved ‘A new light on several to be extremely receptive to major gures involved in the groundbreaking ideas of Newton Isaac Newton (–). the reception of Newton’s Dutch scholars such as Willem work.’ and the Netherlands Jacob ’s Gravesande and Petrus Prof. Bert Theunissen, Newton the Netherlands and van Musschenbroek played a Utrecht University crucial role in the adaption and How Isaac Newton was Fashioned dissemination of Newton’s work, ‘is book provides an in the Dutch Republic not only in the Netherlands important contribution to but also in the rest of Europe. EDITED BY ERIC JORINK In the course of the eighteenth the study of the European AND AD MAAS century, Newton’s ideas (in Enlightenment with new dierent guises and interpre- insights in the circulation tations) became a veritable hype in Dutch society. In Newton of knowledge.’ and the Netherlands Newton’s Prof. Frans van Lunteren, sudden success is analyzed in Leiden University great depth and put into a new perspective. Ad Maas is curator at the Museum Boerhaave, Leiden, the Netherlands. Eric Jorink is researcher at the Huygens Institute for Netherlands History (Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences). / www.lup.nl LUP Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag. 1 Newton and the Netherlands Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag. 2 Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag.
    [Show full text]
  • Ennius Or Cicero? the Disreputable Diviners at Cic
    ACTA CLASSICAXLIV(200/) 153-166 ISSN 0065-1141 ENNIUS OR CICERO? THE DISREPUTABLE DIVINERS AT CIC. DE DIV. 1.132 A.T. Nice University of the Witwatersrand ABSTRACT At the end of the first book of Cicero's De Divir1atior1e, Quintus remarks that, even though he believes in divination, there are some diviners whom he would not trust to give accurate predictions. These comments are followed by a quotation from Ennius' Telamo. Most modem scholars have assumed, therefore, that the previous lines also contain an echo, if not a paraphrase of Ennius' work. This supposition does not seem to be supported by the language or style employed by Cicero. The lines should rather be understood as embodying the parochial view that elite Romans had towards forms of divination that were foreign, rustic or mercenary and not practised by the Roman state. I At the end of the first book of De Divinatione ( 1.132), Quintus completes his argument in favour of divination by denying the respectability of certain kinds ofdiviners: Nunc illa testabor, non me sortilegos neque eos, qui quaestus causa hariolentur, ne psychomantia quidem, quibus Appius, amicus tuus, uti solebat, agnoscere; non habeo denique nauci Marsum augurem, non vicanos haruspices, non de circo astrologos, non Isiacos coniectores, non interpretes somniorum; non enim sunt ii aut scientia aut arte divini. 1 The lines that follow, '(sed)2 superstitiosi vates inpudentes harioli ... de his di vitiis sibi deducant drachmam, reddant cetera,' are normally attributed to Ennius. Some previous commentators considered that the Ennius quotation should begin earlier, specifically from 'non habeo denique nauci.' 3 In favour 1 I use here the Teubner edition of R.
    [Show full text]
  • HCS — History of Classical Scholarship
    ISSN: 2632-4091 History of Classical Scholarship www.hcsjournal.org ISSUE 1 (2019) Dedication page for the Historiae by Herodotus, printed at Venice, 1494 The publication of this journal has been co-funded by the Department of Humanities of Ca’ Foscari University of Venice and the School of History, Classics and Archaeology of Newcastle University Editors Lorenzo CALVELLI Federico SANTANGELO (Venezia) (Newcastle) Editorial Board Luciano CANFORA Marc MAYER (Bari) (Barcelona) Jo-Marie CLAASSEN Laura MECELLA (Stellenbosch) (Milano) Massimiliano DI FAZIO Leandro POLVERINI (Pavia) (Roma) Patricia FORTINI BROWN Stefan REBENICH (Princeton) (Bern) Helena GIMENO PASCUAL Ronald RIDLEY (Alcalá de Henares) (Melbourne) Anthony GRAFTON Michael SQUIRE (Princeton) (London) Judith P. HALLETT William STENHOUSE (College Park, Maryland) (New York) Katherine HARLOE Christopher STRAY (Reading) (Swansea) Jill KRAYE Daniela SUMMA (London) (Berlin) Arnaldo MARCONE Ginette VAGENHEIM (Roma) (Rouen) Copy-editing & Design Thilo RISING (Newcastle) History of Classical Scholarship Issue () TABLE OF CONTENTS LORENZO CALVELLI, FEDERICO SANTANGELO A New Journal: Contents, Methods, Perspectives i–iv GERARD GONZÁLEZ GERMAIN Conrad Peutinger, Reader of Inscriptions: A Note on the Rediscovery of His Copy of the Epigrammata Antiquae Urbis (Rome, ) – GINETTE VAGENHEIM L’épitaphe comme exemplum virtutis dans les macrobies des Antichi eroi et huomini illustri de Pirro Ligorio ( c.–) – MASSIMILIANO DI FAZIO Gli Etruschi nella cultura popolare italiana del XIX secolo. Le indagini di Charles G. Leland – JUDITH P. HALLETT The Legacy of the Drunken Duchess: Grace Harriet Macurdy, Barbara McManus and Classics at Vassar College, – – LUCIANO CANFORA La lettera di Catilina: Norden, Marchesi, Syme – CHRISTOPHER STRAY The Glory and the Grandeur: John Clarke Stobart and the Defence of High Culture in a Democratic Age – ILSE HILBOLD Jules Marouzeau and L’Année philologique: The Genesis of a Reform in Classical Bibliography – BEN CARTLIDGE E.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephanus Noster • Tanulmányok Bartók István 60
    5 6 Stephanus noster • Tanulmányok Bartók István 60. születésnapjára Szerkesztette Jankovics József Jankovits László Szilágyi Emőke Rita Zászkaliczky Márton reciti Budapest, 2015 7 A kötet megjelenését támogatták Fodor Pál, az MTA Bölcsészettudományi Kutatóközpont főigazgatója MTA Bölcsészettudományi Kutatóközpont Irodalomtudományi Intézetének munkatársai A szerzők A borítón: Leonardo da Vinci Ginevra de’ Benci-portréjának hátoldala (1474, részlet), National Gallery of Art, Washington Könyvünk a Creative Commons Nevezd meg! – Ne add el! – Így add tovább! 2.5 Magyarország Licenc (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by−nc−sa/2.5/hu/) feltételei szerint szabadon másolható, idézhető, sokszorosítható. Köteteink a r e c i t i honlapjáról letölthetők. Éljen jogaival! ISBN 978-615-5478-16-1 Kiadja a r e c i t i, az MTA BTK Irodalomtudományi Intézetének tartalomszolgáltató portálja ▶ http://www.reciti.hu Borító és tördelés: Szilágyi N. Zsuzsa Linux Libertine, Liberation Sans Narrow 8 • Tabula gratulatoria A. Molnár Ferenc Lengyel Réka Angyalosi Gergely Lőrinczi Réka Ács Pál Máté Ágnes Klára Balogh Magdolna Medgyesy S. Norbert Báthory Orsolya Mohl Györgyi Békés Enikő Nagy Csilla Bene Sándor Németh S. Katalin Berkes Tamás Orlovszky Géza Bessenyei József Pajorin Klára Bíró Csilla Pálffy Géza Bitskey István Pálfy Eszter Bogár Judit Papp Ingrid Deczki Sarolta Sántha Teréz Debreczeni Attila Sarankó Márta Domonkos Gyöngyi Schelhammer Zsófi Etlinger Mihály Stauder Mária F. Molnár Mónika Szabados György Fodor Pál Szatmári Áron Földes Györgyi Széchenyi Ágnes Gábor Csilla Szénási Zoltán Gulyás Bori Szentpéteri Márton Hajdu Péter Takács László Hites Sándor Tamás Zsuzsanna Hubert Ildikó Tóth Zsombor Jenei Éva Tüskés Anna Kálmán C. György Varga Réka Kappanyos András Veres András Kecskeméti Gábor Verók Attila Kiss Margit Zsupán Edina Korompay H.
    [Show full text]
  • Renaissance Receptions of Ovid's Tristia Dissertation
    RENAISSANCE RECEPTIONS OF OVID’S TRISTIA DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Gabriel Fuchs, M.A. Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Frank T. Coulson, Advisor Benjamin Acosta-Hughes Tom Hawkins Copyright by Gabriel Fuchs 2013 ABSTRACT This study examines two facets of the reception of Ovid’s Tristia in the 16th century: its commentary tradition and its adaptation by Latin poets. It lays the groundwork for a more comprehensive study of the Renaissance reception of the Tristia by providing a scholarly platform where there was none before (particularly with regard to the unedited, unpublished commentary tradition), and offers literary case studies of poetic postscripts to Ovid’s Tristia in order to explore the wider impact of Ovid’s exilic imaginary in 16th-century Europe. After a brief introduction, the second chapter introduces the three major commentaries on the Tristia printed in the Renaissance: those of Bartolomaeus Merula (published 1499, Venice), Veit Amerbach (1549, Basel), and Hecules Ciofanus (1581, Antwerp) and analyzes their various contexts, styles, and approaches to the text. The third chapter shows the commentators at work, presenting a more focused look at how these commentators apply their differing methods to the same selection of the Tristia, namely Book 2. These two chapters combine to demonstrate how commentary on the Tristia developed over the course of the 16th century: it begins from an encyclopedic approach, becomes focused on rhetoric, and is later aimed at textual criticism, presenting a trajectory that ii becomes increasingly focused and philological.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Ars Historica Como Arte Da Prudência
    4. Ars historica como arte da prudência. Quando eu considero a quantidade e a variedade dos acidentes, das enfermidades, do acaso e da violência a que a vida do homem é submetida e quantas coisas devem concorrer no ano para que a colheita seja boa, não há nada que me espante mais que ver um homem velho, um ano fértil (Francesco Guicciardini. Ricordi, máxima 161). 4.1 Uma construção de fatos e palavras. Tucídides: sobre a distinção entre logos e ergon e o procedimento da autópsia. O princípio da utilidade: Tucídides e Políbio. O tratamento latino para a tensão entre res e verba. Os preceitos da ars historica no De Oratore. A história como monumento da virtus: Salústio e Tito Lívio. Embora a história – entendida como prática de inquirição sobre as grandes e memoráveis obras dos homens calcada numa "atitude crítica com relação ao registro de acontecimentos”,1 cujo propósito central seria o de salvar os feitos humanos do esquecimento –2 tenha não apenas surgido na Grécia do V século como alcançado, com Heródoto e Tucídides, sua maior expressividade no mundo antigo, a discussão acerca da concepção retórica de história predominante na Antiguidade deve dar atenção especial às reflexões de Cícero no livro II do diálogo De Oratore, isto porque os gregos jamais chegaram a definir a história como um gênero retórico-poético. Porém, antes de discutir os preceitos ciceronianos sobre a escrita da história, dedicarei algumas páginas à análise da tensão entre logos e ergon na História da Guerra do Peloponeso de Tucídides, assim como ao exame da concepção de autópsia e do privilégio do testemunho ocular sobre os relatos orais predominantes entre os historiadores gregos, como 1 MOMIGLIANO, Arnaldo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fate of Johannes Sambucus' Library
    HStud 30 (2016)2, 155–166 DOI: 10.1556/044.2016.30.2.2 THE FATE OF JOHANNES SAMBUCUS’ LIBRARY NOÉMI VISKOLCZ University of Miskolc [email protected] Some of the manuscripts and books of the Hungarian humanist, Johannes Sambu- cus (1531‒1584) are still kept in Vienna, in the Austrian National Library. A source of information puts a new light on the sale and reception of his library. In his last will made in 1583, Sambucus left his library, the manuscripts he still owned and his maps to his son, in 1584, not long after his death, his widow started negotiations about selling them to the Emperor Rudolf II. However, the data clearly suggest that Sambucus’ library did not become en bloc part of the Imperial Library, if the purchase took place at all: only 44 years after Sambucus’ death was a certain part of his library bought by Sebastian Tengnagel for both the Imperial Library and him- self. Another result of the research confi rms that the philologist Sambucus cannot be separated from the book and manuscript collector Sambucus, and the examples presented here justify why it is worth involving in the research the extant books of the Hungarian humanist. Keywords: Johannes Sambucus, library, Sebastian Tengnagel, Humanism, Greek language books, Hofbibliothek, Vienna Some of the manuscripts and books of the Hungarian humanist, Johannes Sam- bucus (1531‒1584) are still kept in Vienna in the Austrian National Library. Hans Gerstinger, Pál Gulyás, Franz Unterkircher, and recently Gábor Almási have all intensively studied the fate of Sambucus’ manuscripts and books, and the history of the library,1 which can be summarised as follows: due to his dire fi nancial situ- ation, in 1570 Sambucus had already offered part of his valuable manuscripts – 360 of which were written in Greek (including several unpublished texts) and 140 in Latin – to emperor Maximilian I, asking 5 ducats for each volume and a total of 2500 ducats.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Printing the Classical Text, by Howard Jones Julia H
    Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Greek, Latin, and Classical Studies Faculty Research Greek, Latin, and Classical Studies and Scholarship 2005 Review of Printing the Classical Text, by Howard Jones Julia H. Gaisser Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.brynmawr.edu/classics_pubs Part of the Classics Commons Custom Citation Gaisser, Julia H. Review of Printing the Classical Text, by Howard Jones. Renaissance Quarterly 58 (2005): 683-685. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/classics_pubs/27 For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOOK REVIEWS 683 Howard Jones. Printing the Classical Text. Bibliotheca Humanistica & Reformatorica 62. Utrecht: Hes & de Graaf Publishers BV, 2004. x + 228 pp. index. append. illus. tbls. bibl. €132.50. ISBN: 90–6194–279–9. The History of the Book is booming these days, as Cyndia Susan Clegg justly observes in a recent review essay: “History of the Book: An Undisciplined Discipline” (RQ 54 [2001] 221–45). Jones’s useful book would fit nicely on the shelf with those reviewed by Clegg — probably next to Brian Richardson’s somewhat meatier and more detailed Printing, Writers and Readers in Renaissance Italy (Cambridge, 1999). While Richardson surveys Italian printing through a wide lens that takes in its technology, finances, and audience, as well as its total production through the sixteenth century, Jones focuses on the Latin and Greek texts printed from 1465 to 1500, which constitute only about 6% of the books of the incunable period (9).
    [Show full text]
  • US OPEN New York 2013
    US OPEN New York 2013 26 E 64th Street, New York NY 10065 UMBERTO PREGLIASCO FILIPPO ROTUNDO [email protected] [email protected] ☎ +39 34 82 68 26 27 ☎ +39 33 55 95 53 04 THEBIRTHOFTHELOVE DIALOGUE ALBERTI, Leon Battista. Deifira. [Padua, Laurentius Canozius, de Lendenaria], 1471. $ 150,000 4° (214x153 mm). [20] ll. 19th century dark brown morocco binding, gilt- lettered spine. Restoration at the spine. Very good copy, a small repair in corrispondence of a wormhole at the first leaf, some light stains. Provenance: Pietro Spini (ownership note); RR (bookplate). Exceedingly rare editio princeps of the first printed literary work by a living author, first dialogue on love written in prose and one of the first works in vernacular ever printed. Its rarity is attested by the absence of auction records during the 20th and 21st centuries, furthermore only two copies are located in American public libraries (New Haven CT, Yale Univ., Beinecke Library; New York NY, Pierpont Morgan Library). This first Alberti’s (1404- 1472) printed work was seen as an avant-garde initiation of a genre at the borderline between poetry and prose, which will be canonized only at the end of the century by Pietro Bembo (Asolani, 1505). H 422*; GW 576; BMC VI, 616; IGI 150; GOFF A, 212; RIDOLFI, pp. 29-48. 3 DIETETICS IN THE 14TH CENTURY ALDOBRANDINO da Siena. Régime du corps, translated in Italian. An interpolated version of the translation realized in May 1310 by the Florentine notary Zuchero Bencivenni. Manuscript on paper, Tuscany, end of the 14th century.
    [Show full text]
  • IMT School for Advanced Studies, Lucca Lucca, Italy Measuring Time Histories of Chronology Building in Archaeology Phd Program
    IMT School for Advanced Studies, Lucca Lucca, Italy Measuring Time Histories of chronology building in archaeology PhD Program in Analysis and Management of Cultural Heritage XXX Cycle By Maria Emanuela Oddo 2020 The dissertation of Maria Emanuela Oddo is approved. PhD Program Coordinator: Prof. Emanuele Pellegrini, IMT School for advanced Studies Lucca Advisor: Prof. Maria Luisa Catoni Co-Advisor: Prof. Maurizio Harari The dissertation of Maria Emanuela Oddo has been reviewed by: Prof. Marcello Barbanera, University of Rome La Sapienza Prof. Silvia Paltineri, University of Padova IMT School for Advanced Studies, Lucca 2020 Contents Acknowledgements vii Vita ix Publications xii Presentations xiv Abstract xvi List of Figures xvii List of Tables xxi 0 Introduction 1 0.1 Archaeological chronologies 1 0.2 Histories of archaeological chronologies 3 0.3 Selection of case studies 5 1 La Grotte de la Verpillière, Germolles (FR) 13 1.1 Grotte de la Verpillière I 13 1.1.1 Charles Méray 15 1.1.2 Gabriel De Mortillet and la question Aurignacienne 23 1.1.3 Henri Breuil 35 1.1.4 Henri Delporte 40 1.1.5 Jean Combier 46 1.1.6 Harald Floss 48 1.1.7 Ten new radiocarbon dates at ORAU 58 1.2 Analyzing the debate 63 1.2.1 Neanderthals and Modern Humans 67 iii 1.2.2 The Aurignacian: unpacking a conceptual unit 76 1.2.3 Split-base points and the nature of ‘index fossils’ 85 1.3 Conclusions 96 2 The Fusco Necropolis, Syracuse (IT) 100 2.1 The Fusco Necropolis. An under-published reference site 118 2.1.1 Luigi Mauceri 119 2.1.2 Francesco Saverio Cavallari 140
    [Show full text]