DOCSLIB.ORG

22 3 259 263 Mikhailov Alopecosa.P65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
22 3 259 263 Mikhailov Alopecosa.P65 Arthropoda Selecta 22(3): 259263 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2013 Tarentula Sundevall, 1833 and Alopecosa Simon, 1885: a historical account (Aranei: Lycosidae) Tarentula Sundevall, 1833 è Alopecosa Simon, 1885: èñòîðè÷åñêèé îáçîð (Aranei: Lycosidae) K.G. Mikhailov Ê.Ã. Ìèõàéëîâ Zoological Museum MGU, Bolshaya Nikitskaya Str. 6, Moscow 125009 Russia. Çîîëîãè÷åñêèé ìóçåé ÌÃÓ, óë. Áîëüøàÿ Íèêèòñêàÿ, 6, Ìîñêâà 125009 Ðîññèÿ. KEY WORDS: Tarentula, Alopecosa, nomenclature, synonymy, spiders, Lycosidae. ÊËÞ×ÅÂÛÅ ÑËÎÂÀ: Tarentula, Alopecosa, íîìåíêëàòóðà, ñèíîíèìèÿ, ïàóêè, Lycosidae. ABSTRACT. History of Tarentula Sundevall, 1833 genus Lycosa to include the following 11 species (the and Alopecosa Simon, 1885 is reviewed. Validity of current species assignments follow the catalogues by Alopecosa Simon, 1885 is supported. Reimoser [1919], Roewer [1954a], and, especially, Bonnet [1955, 1957, 1959]): ÐÅÇÞÌÅ. Äàí îáçîð èñòîðèè ðîäîâûõ íàçâà- Lycosa Fabrilis [= Alopecosa fabrilis (Clerck, 1758)], íèé Tarentula Sundevall, 1833 è Alopecosa Simon, L. trabalis [= Alopecosa inquilina (Clerck, 1758), male, 1885. Îáîñíîâàíà âàëèäíîñòü íàçâàíèÿ Alopecosa and A. trabalis (Clerck, 1758), female], Simon, 1885. L. vorax?, male [= either Alopecosa trabalis or A. trabalis and A. pulverulenta (Clerck, 1758), according Introduction to different sources], L. nivalis male [= Alopecosa aculeata (Clerck, 1758)], The nomenclatorial problems concerning the ge- L. barbipes [sp.n.] [= Alopecosa barbipes Sundevall, neric names Tarantula Fabricius, 1793, Tarentula Sun- 1833, = A. accentuata (Latreille, 1817)], devall, 1833 and Alopecosa Simon, 1885 have been L. cruciata female [sp.n.] [= Alopecosa barbipes Sun- discussed in the arachnological literature at least twice devall, 1833, = A. accentuata (Latreille, 1817)], [Charitonov, 1931; Bonnet, 1951]. However, the arach- L. pulverulenta [= Alopecosa pulverulenta], nological community seems to have overlooked or ne- L. cuneata [= Alopecosa cuneata (Clerck, 1758)], L. aculeata? [= Xerolycosa nemoralis (Westring, glected both these papers, apparently because neither 1861)], of them was published in English. L. cinerea [= Arctosa cinerea (Fabricius, 1777)], and The aims of the present paper are (1) to again stress L. ruricola [= Trochosa terricola Thorell, 1856]. the invalidity of the generic name Tarentula Sundevall, According to Article 67.2.1 [ICZN], the type spe- 1833; and (2) to briefly outline the history of Tarentula cies of the genus must be chosen only amongst the Sundevall, 1833 and Alopecosa Simon, 1885 in the aforementioned species. 19th century in the context of the widely accepted In a footnote, Sundevall [1833b: 181] wrote: Fab- lycosid generic classification established by Dahl ricius nomen Tarentulae male adhibuit, illis Arachnid- [1908]. The latter was based solely on somatic charac- ibus designandis, quae hodie nomine Phryno et The- ters and is here considered the recent system. The lyphono salutantur. Rectius ideo huic sectioni, cujus modern system of genera by Lehtinen [1967], based speciei maxime celebri ab antiquitate nomen fuit im- on characters of the copulatory organs, is omitted here positum, reddendum est. (translated by the author: as irrelevant to the earlier confusions in nomenclature. Fabricius lamely applied the name Tarentula (sic!) to define those arachnids that are now usually called Phry- Taxonomic part nus and Thelyphonus. Therefore, for this section it is more correct to use the name which was given to its The genus Tarantula was described by Fabricius best-known species from the time of Antiquity.). In [1793: vii, 432] in Amblypygi, but now this name is no other words, Sundevall regarded the slightly misspelled longer used [Harvey, 2003]. name Tarantula Fabricius as invalid, not to be applied, The spider genus Tarentula (sic!) was originally instead suggesting its use for another arachnid group. It proposed for several Swedish spiders by Sundevall may seem that Sundevall did use that name for a differ- [1833b: 181] as a Sectio Tarentulae within the large ent arachnid group, but this was not so. In a subsequent 260 K.G. Mikhailov paper, Sundevall [1833a: 24] provided a diagnosis of T. vulpina [Hogna vulpina (C.L. Koch, 1847)], Brazil. the subgenus under the name Tarentula nob[is, = ours, T. xylina [?= Hogna radiata], Algeria. Latin], with reference to the previous paper [Sunde- T. rubiginosa [= Lycosa tarantula], Italy. vall, 1833b; see also Blick & Kronestedt [2000], for T. grisea [T. grisea C.L. Koch, 1847, praeocc.; now the discussion on the date of publication of the latter Hogna graeca (Roewer, 1951)], Greece: Nauplia. work]. Therefore, Sundevalls work [1833a] can be T. famelica [= Hogna radiata], Greece. treated at a stretch not just as a subsequent misspelled T. fabrilis [Alopecosa fabrilis (Clerck, 1758)], Swe- Tarantula of Fabricius [in the sense of Article 33, den, Germany, France. ICZN], but as an original name. Yet, the correct inter- T. inquilina [Alopecosa accentuata (Latreille, 1817)], pretation of Sundevall reference [1833b] is to be treat- Germany, Sweden. ed as misspelling. Therefore, according to ICZN Arti- T. vorax [= Alopecosa trabalis (Clerck, 1758)], Eu- cle 33.3, the name Tarentula Sundevall, 1833 is to be rope north of the Alps. considered as an unavailable name. T. sagittata [= Alopecosa albofasciata (Brullé, 1832)], N.I. Platnick (pers. comm.) interpreted Sundevalls Greece: Nauplia. footnote (i.e., the best-known species from the time of T. taeniata [Alopecosa taeniata C.L. Koch, 1835], Ger- Antiquity) as a clear indication that Lycosa tarantula many, France. (Linnaeus, 1758) was the central member of the sec- T. fuscipes [Alopecosa fuscipes (C.L. Koch, 1847), tion. However, the paper by Sundevall [1833b] includ- nomen dubium], Greece: Nauplia. ed only Swedish species, whereas L. tarantula is only T. cuneata [Alopecosa cuneata (Clerck, 1758), or = A. known from the Mediterranean region. Perhaps this pulverulenta (Clerck, 1758)], Sweden, Germany, was the reason for the absence of L. tarantula from the France. original list of Tarentula species. In any event, accord- T. Gasteinensis [= Alopecosa pulverulenta (Clerck, ing to ICZN Article 67.2.1, since the name L. tarantula 1758)], Austria. was absent from the initial list, it cannot be the type T. clavipes [= Alopecosa cuneata (Clerck, 1758)], species of Tarentula. France, Germany, Sweden. C.L. Koch [1847: 9697] used the name Tarantula T. alpica [= Alopecosa cuneata (Clerck, 1758)], Ger- (sic!, cited either as Tarentula by numerous subsequent many. students or as Tarantula by Ohlert [1867]) as a subge- T. miniata [= Xerolycosa miniata (C.L. Koch, 1834)], nus of Lycosa. Compared to the Sundevall list, C.L. Germany. Koch included a different set of 30 species distributed T. nivalis [= Xerolycosa nemoralis (Westring, 1861)], worldwide. The name Tarantula was used in a short Germany, Sweden. species list on p. 97, whereas Lycosa (Tarantula) was Of the 30 aforementioned species names, ten be- used in extended species descriptions elsewhere in the long to Alopecosa in its modern scope (cf. Tarentula book, as well as both in the index and figure captions. sensu Dahl [1908]). The modern names are given after Bonnet [1959] and Walckenaer [1837] presented a complicated artifi- Platnick [2013], the distribution data follow C.L. Koch cial system of lycosids, with families given within gen- [1847]: era, and races within families. His fifth lycosid genus, Tarantula praegrandis [Lycosa praegrandis C.L. Koch, Lycosa, included the family Terrenides with five races; 1836], Greece. the first four being important for the current discussion. T. Narbonnensis [L. narbonensis Walckenaer in La- 1st Race. Tarentulae. treille, 1806], France. 1. Lycosa tarentula Apuliae [L. tarantula (Linnaeus, T. Apuliae [= Lycosa tarantula (Linnaeus, 1758)], Ita- 1758)]. Italy, Spain. ly, Spain, Portugal. 2. Lycosa tarentula Narbonensis (L. narbonensis Wal- T. Helleniae [Lycosa hellenica C.L. Koch, 1836, now ckenaer in Latreille, 1806). France, Italy, Greece, Ger- = Hogna radiata (Latreille, 1817)], Greece: Nauplia. many. T. erythrostoma [= Lycosa raptoria Walckenaer, 1837, (without number) Lycosa tarentula hellenica [= Ho- now L. erythrognatha Lucas, 1836], Brazil. gna radiata (Latreille, 1817)]. Greece. T. poliostoma [Lycosa poliostoma C.L. Koch, 1847], 3. Lycosa tarentula Hispanica [Hogna hispanica (Wal- Uruguay. ckenaer, 1837)]. Spain. T. isabellina [= Hogna radiata], France. 4. Lycosa tarentula Carolinensis [Hogna carolinensis T. rufimana [= Lycosa raptoria, now L. erythrognatha], (Walckenaer, 1805)]. USA. Uruguay. 5. Lycosa tarentula Georgiana (= Hogna carolinen- T. funesta [Venatrix funesta (C.L. Koch, 1847)], Aus- sis). USA. tralia. 5bis. Lycosa tarentula suspecta (nomen oblitum; = T. obsoleta [Alopecosa obsoleta (C.L. Koch, 1847)], Dolomedes albineus Hentz, 1845). USA. Uzbekistan: Bukhara. 2nd Race. Tarentuloides. T. helvola [Agalenocosa helvola (C.L. Koch, 1847)], 6. Lycosa tarentuloides singoriensis [Allohogna sin- Colombia: St. Cruz. goriensis (Laxmann, 1770)]. Russia, Cyprus. T. ornata [Hogna ornata (Perty, 1833)], Brazil. 7. Lycosa tarentuloides Liguriensis (= Hogna radia- T. Pertyi [= Lycosa tarantuloides Perty, 1833], Brazil. ta). Italy. Tarentula and Alopecosa: a historical account (Aranei: Lycosidae) 261 8. Lycosa tarentuloides Georgicola [Tigrosa georgicola 33. Lycosa vehemens (= Hogna carolinensis). USA. (Walckenaer, 1837)]. USA. 34. Lycosa impavida (missing in basic catalogues and 9. Lycosa tarentuloides Philadelphiana (L. philadel-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TFG Lucas Fernandez Miriam.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDAD DE JAÉN Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales Trabajo Fin de Grado Revisión bibliográfica de los Licósidos (Araneidae, Lycosidae) presentes en el sureste de la península ibérica Ciencias Experimentales Alumno: Miriam Lucas Fernández Facultad de Julio, 2020 UNIVERSIDAD DE JAÉN FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS EXPERIMENTALES GRADO EN BIOLOGÍA Trabajo Fin de Grado Revisión bibliográfica de los Licósidos (Araneidae, Lycosidae) presentes en el sureste de la península ibérica Miriam Lucas Fernández Julio, 2020 1 RESUMEN ………………………………………………………………………………3 2 INTRODUCCIÓN ................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Distribución y diversidad de las arañas ......................................................... 4 2.2 Morfología biológica ...................................................................................... 5 2.3 Biología reproductiva del orden Araneae ...................................................... 7 3 OBJETIVOS ........................................................................................................ 8 4 MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS ............................................................................... 9 5 FAMILIA LYCOSIDAE: Perspectiva mundial e ibérica ....................................... 9 5.1 Taxonomía .................................................................................................. 10 5.2 Identificación ............................................................................................... 12 5.3 Hábitat ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Selection Research on Spiders: Progress and Biases
    Biol. Rev. (2005), 80, pp. 363–385. f Cambridge Philosophical Society 363 doi:10.1017/S1464793104006700 Printed in the United Kingdom Sexual selection research on spiders: progress and biases Bernhard A. Huber* Zoological Research Institute and Museum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany (Received 7 June 2004; revised 25 November 2004; accepted 29 November 2004) ABSTRACT The renaissance of interest in sexual selection during the last decades has fuelled an extraordinary increase of scientific papers on the subject in spiders. Research has focused both on the process of sexual selection itself, for example on the signals and various modalities involved, and on the patterns, that is the outcome of mate choice and competition depending on certain parameters. Sexual selection has most clearly been demonstrated in cases involving visual and acoustical signals but most spiders are myopic and mute, relying rather on vibrations, chemical and tactile stimuli. This review argues that research has been biased towards modalities that are relatively easily accessible to the human observer. Circumstantial and comparative evidence indicates that sexual selection working via substrate-borne vibrations and tactile as well as chemical stimuli may be common and widespread in spiders. Pattern-oriented research has focused on several phenomena for which spiders offer excellent model objects, like sexual size dimorphism, nuptial feeding, sexual cannibalism, and sperm competition. The accumulating evidence argues for a highly complex set of explanations for seemingly uniform patterns like size dimorphism and sexual cannibalism. Sexual selection appears involved as well as natural selection and mechanisms that are adaptive in other contexts only. Sperm competition has resulted in a plethora of morpho- logical and behavioural adaptations, and simplistic models like those linking reproductive morphology with behaviour and sperm priority patterns in a straightforward way are being replaced by complex models involving an array of parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Spiders (Araneae) of Churchill, Manitoba: DNA Barcodes And
    Blagoev et al. BMC Ecology 2013, 13:44 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6785/13/44 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Spiders (Araneae) of Churchill, Manitoba: DNA barcodes and morphology reveal high species diversity and new Canadian records Gergin A Blagoev1*, Nadya I Nikolova1, Crystal N Sobel1, Paul DN Hebert1,2 and Sarah J Adamowicz1,2 Abstract Background: Arctic ecosystems, especially those near transition zones, are expected to be strongly impacted by climate change. Because it is positioned on the ecotone between tundra and boreal forest, the Churchill area is a strategic locality for the analysis of shifts in faunal composition. This fact has motivated the effort to develop a comprehensive biodiversity inventory for the Churchill region by coupling DNA barcoding with morphological studies. The present study represents one element of this effort; it focuses on analysis of the spider fauna at Churchill. Results: 198 species were detected among 2704 spiders analyzed, tripling the count for the Churchill region. Estimates of overall diversity suggest that another 10–20 species await detection. Most species displayed little intraspecific sequence variation (maximum <1%) in the barcode region of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, but four species showed considerably higher values (maximum = 4.1-6.2%), suggesting cryptic species. All recognized species possessed a distinct haplotype array at COI with nearest-neighbour interspecific distances averaging 8.57%. Three species new to Canada were detected: Robertus lyrifer (Theridiidae), Baryphyma trifrons (Linyphiidae), and Satilatlas monticola (Linyphiidae). The first two species may represent human-mediated introductions linked to the port in Churchill, but the other species represents a range extension from the USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Spiders in Coastal Grey Dunes
    kaft_def 7/8/04 11:22 AM Pagina 1 SPATIAL PATTERNS AND EVOLUTIONARY D ISTRIBUTION OF SPIDERS IN COASTAL GREY DUNES Distribution of spiders in coastal grey dunes SPATIAL PATTERNS AND EVOLUTIONARY- ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF DISPERSAL - ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF DISPERSAL Dries Bonte Dispersal is crucial in structuring species distribution, population structure and species ranges at large geographical scales or within local patchily distributed populations. The knowledge of dispersal evolution, motivation, its effect on metapopulation dynamics and species distribution at multiple scales is poorly understood and many questions remain unsolved or require empirical verification. In this thesis we contribute to the knowledge of dispersal, by studying both ecological and evolutionary aspects of spider dispersal in fragmented grey dunes. Studies were performed at the individual, population and assemblage level and indicate that behavioural traits narrowly linked to dispersal, con- siderably show [adaptive] variation in function of habitat quality and geometry. Dispersal also determines spider distribution patterns and metapopulation dynamics. Consequently, our results stress the need to integrate knowledge on behavioural ecology within the study of ecological landscapes. / Promotor: Prof. Dr. Eckhart Kuijken [Ghent University & Institute of Nature Dries Bonte Conservation] Co-promotor: Prf. Dr. Jean-Pierre Maelfait [Ghent University & Institute of Nature Conservation] and Prof. Dr. Luc lens [Ghent University] Date of public defence: 6 February 2004 [Ghent University] Universiteit Gent Faculteit Wetenschappen Academiejaar 2003-2004 Distribution of spiders in coastal grey dunes: spatial patterns and evolutionary-ecological importance of dispersal Verspreiding van spinnen in grijze kustduinen: ruimtelijke patronen en evolutionair-ecologisch belang van dispersie door Dries Bonte Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor [Ph.D.] in Sciences Proefschrift voorgedragen tot het bekomen van de graad van Doctor in de Wetenschappen Promotor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Chronic Exposure to the Herbicide, Mesotrione, on Spiders
    Susquehanna University Scholarly Commons Senior Scholars Day Apr 28th, 12:00 AM - 12:00 AM Effects of Chronic Exposure to the Herbicide, Mesotrione, on Spiders Maya Khanna Susquehanna University Joseph Evans Susquehanna University Matthew Persons Susquehanna University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.susqu.edu/ssd Khanna, Maya; Evans, Joseph; and Persons, Matthew, "Effects of Chronic Exposure to the Herbicide, Mesotrione, on Spiders" (2020). Senior Scholars Day. 34. https://scholarlycommons.susqu.edu/ssd/2020/posters/34 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Scholars Day by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Effects of Chronic Exposure to the Herbicide, Mesotrione on Spiders Maya Khanna, Joseph Evans, and Matthew Persons Department of Biology, Susquehanna University, PA 17870 Tigrosa helluo Trochosa ruricola Mecaphesa asperata Frontinella pyramitela Tetragnatha laboriosa Hogna lenta Pisaurina mira Abstract Methods All spiders were collected on Table 1. The predicted lethality of mesotrione on each spider species based upon soil association levels and species size. Toxicity is predicted to increase with smaller size and Mesotrione is a widely used agricultural herbicide and is frequently used alone or as an adjuvant for the Susquehanna University’s campus. Each spider was housed in a 473 ml (16oz) greater soil contact. Sample sizes for each species are indicated to the left. A total of 615 herbicides glyphosate and atrazine. The effects of mesotrione are largely untested on beneficial non-target spiders were used in this study. species such as spiders.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Predation on Reproducing Wolf Spiders: Access to Information Has Differential Effects on Male and Female Survival
    Animal Behaviour 128 (2017) 165e173 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Animal Behaviour journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav Predation on reproducing wolf spiders: access to information has differential effects on male and female survival * Ann L. Rypstra a, , Chad D. Hoefler b, 1, Matthew H. Persons c, 2 a Department of Biology, Miami University, Hamilton, OH, U.S.A. b Department of Biology, Arcadia University, Glenside, PA, U.S.A. c Department of Biology, Susquehanna University, Selinsgrove, PA, U.S.A. article info Predation has widespread influences on animal behaviour, and reproductive activities can be particularly Article history: dangerous. Males and females differ in their reactions to sensory stimuli from predators and potential Received 13 September 2016 mates, which affects the risk experienced by each sex. Thus, the information available can cause dif- Initial acceptance 8 November 2016 ferential survival and have profound implications for mating opportunities and population structure. The Final acceptance 24 March 2017 wolf spider, Pardosa milvina, detects and responds in a risk-sensitive manner to chemotactile information from a larger predator, the wolf spider Tigrosa helluo. Male P. milvina use similar chemotactile cues to find MS. number: A16-00806R2 females whereas female P. milvina focus on the visual, and perhaps vibratory, aspects of the male display. Our aim was to document the risk posed by T. helluo predators on P. milvina during reproduction and to Keywords: determine whether augmenting chemotactile information would affect that outcome. In the laboratory, chemical cue we explored the effects of adding predator and/or female cues on the predatory success of T.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Meeting
    IOBC / WPRS Working Group „Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms“ OILB / SROP Groupe de Travail „Pesticides et Organismes Utiles“ Proceedings of the meeting at Berlin, Germany 10th –12th October 2007 Editors: Heidrun Vogt, Jean-Pierre Jansen, Elisa Vinuela & Pilar Medina IOBC wprs Bulletin Bulletin OILB srop Vol. 35, 2008 The content of the contributions is in the responsibility of the authors The IOBC/WPRS Bulletin is published by the International Organization for Biological and Integrated Control of Noxious Animals and Plants, West Palearctic Regional Section (IOBC/WPRS) Le Bulletin OILB/SROP est publié par l‘Organisation Internationale de Lutte Biologique et Intégrée contre les Animaux et les Plantes Nuisibles, section Regionale Ouest Paléarctique (OILB/SROP) Copyright: IOBC/WPRS 2008 The Publication Commission of the IOBC/WPRS: Horst Bathon Luc Tirry Julius Kuehn Institute (JKI), Federal University of Gent Research Centre for Cultivated Plants Laboratory of Agrozoology Institute for Biological Control Department of Crop Protection Heinrichstr. 243 Coupure Links 653 D-64287 Darmstadt (Germany) B-9000 Gent (Belgium) Tel +49 6151 407-225, Fax +49 6151 407-290 Tel +32-9-2646152, Fax +32-9-2646239 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] Address General Secretariat: Dr. Philippe C. Nicot INRA – Unité de Pathologie Végétale Domaine St Maurice - B.P. 94 F-84143 Montfavet Cedex (France) ISBN 978-92-9067-209-8 http://www.iobc-wprs.org Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms IOBC/wprs Bulletin Vol. 35, 2008 Preface This Bulletin contains the contributions presented at the meeting of the WG “Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms” held in Berlin, 10 - 12 October 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • 196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 a Revised Checklist of the Spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection Criteria and Lists
    196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 A revised checklist of the spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection criteria and lists Alastair Lavery The checklist has two main sections; List A contains all Burach, Carnbo, species proved or suspected to be established and List B Kinross, KY13 0NX species recorded only in specific circumstances. email: [email protected] The criterion for inclusion in list A is evidence that self- sustaining populations of the species are established within Great Britain and Ireland. This is taken to include records Abstract from the same site over a number of years or from a number A revised checklist of spider species found in Great Britain and of sites. Species not recorded after 1919, one hundred years Ireland is presented together with their national distributions, before the publication of this list, are not included, though national and international conservation statuses and syn- this has not been applied strictly for Irish species because of onymies. The list allows users to access the sources most often substantially lower recording levels. used in studying spiders on the archipelago. The list does not differentiate between species naturally Keywords: Araneae • Europe occurring and those that have established with human assis- tance; in practice this can be very difficult to determine. Introduction List A: species established in natural or semi-natural A checklist can have multiple purposes. Its primary pur- habitats pose is to provide an up-to-date list of the species found in the geographical area and, as in this case, to major divisions The main species list, List A1, includes all species found within that area.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae) Parasite–Host Association
    2006. The Journal of Arachnology 34:273–278 SHORT COMMUNICATION FIRST UNEQUIVOCAL MERMITHID–LINYPHIID (ARANEAE) PARASITE–HOST ASSOCIATION David Penney: Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Susan P. Bennett: Biological Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M1 5GD, UK. ABSTRACT. The first description of a Mermithidae–Linyphiidae parasite–host association is presented. The nematode is preserved exiting the abdomen of the host, which is a juvenile Tenuiphantes species (Araneae, Linyphiidae), collected from the Isle of Mull, UK. An updated taxonomic list of known mer- mithid spider hosts is provided. The ecology of known spider hosts with regard to the direct and indirect life cycles of mermithid worms suggests that both occur in spiders. Keywords: Aranimermis, Isle of Mull, Linyphiidae, Mermithidae, Nematoda Nematode parasites of spiders are restricted to an updated and taxonomically correct list in Table the family Mermithidae but are not uncommon 1. Here we describe the first Mermithidae–Liny- (Poinar 1985, 1987) and were first reported almost phiidae parasite–host association and discuss the two and a half centuries ago (Roesel 1761). How- ecology of known spider hosts with regard to the ever, given the difficulty of identifying and rearing life cycles of mermithid worms. post-parasitic juvenile mermithids, they have re- This paper concerns three spider specimens, one ceived inadequate systematic treatment (Poinar with a worm in situ and two that are presumed to 1985). In addition, the complete life history is have been parasitized, but from which the worms known for only one species of these spider parasites have emerged and are lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Araneae: Lycosidae) from Canada: a Morphological Description Supported by DNA Barcoding of 19 Congeners
    Zootaxa 3894 (1): 152–160 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3894.1.12 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:66AD348F-5A04-4A9F-ADC5-501B4B10804F A new species of Alopecosa (Araneae: Lycosidae) from Canada: a morphological description supported by DNA barcoding of 19 congeners GERGIN A. BLAGOEV1 & CHARLES D. DONDALE2 1 Research Associate, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, [email protected] 2 Retiree, Biodiversity Program, Research Branch, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6, [email protected] Abstract A new species, Alopecosa koponeni sp. n., is described from the Arctic part of Manitoba. Individuals of A. koponeni most resemble those of A. pictilis (Emerton, 1885), but are smaller than the latter and differ in the epiginum and in colour pattern in both sexes. DNA barcode results show an interspecific distance of 0.93 between A. koponeni sp. n. and A. pictilis, a shallow genetic divergence that suggests a recent separation. Introduction Spiders of the Canadian Arctic are becoming better known through recent collecting efforts and through published revisions such as those by Dupérré (2013), Marusik et al. (2006), Marusik & Koponen (2001), Saaristo & Koponen (1998), and Saaristo & Marusik (2004). Additionally, two recent checklists also included arctic species (Buckle et al. 2001; Paquin et al. 2010) and a recent study on the spiders of Churchill revealed an undescribed species of Alopecosa, which was given the interim name Alopecosa sp. 1GAB (Blagoev et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods in Linear Elements
    Arthropods in linear elements Occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Thesis committee Thesis supervisor: Prof. dr. Karlè V. Sýkora Professor of Ecological Construction and Management of Infrastructure Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group Wageningen University Thesis co‐supervisor: Dr. ir. André P. Schaffers Scientific researcher Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology Group Wageningen University Other members: Prof. dr. Dries Bonte Ghent University, Belgium Prof. dr. Hans Van Dyck Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium Prof. dr. Paul F.M. Opdam Wageningen University Prof. dr. Menno Schilthuizen University of Groningen This research was conducted under the auspices of SENSE (School for the Socio‐Economic and Natural Sciences of the Environment) Arthropods in linear elements Occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Jinze Noordijk Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Doctorate Board to be defended in public on Tuesday 3 November 2009 at 1.30 PM in the Aula Noordijk J (2009) Arthropods in linear elements – occurrence, behaviour and conservation management Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen NL with references, with summaries in English and Dutch ISBN 978‐90‐8585‐492‐0 C’est une prairie au petit jour, quelque part sur la Terre. Caché sous cette prairie s’étend un monde démesuré, grand comme une planète. Les herbes folles s’y transforment en jungles impénétrables, les cailloux deviennent montagnes et le plus modeste trou d’eau prend les dimensions d’un océan. Nuridsany C & Pérennou M 1996.
    [Show full text]