DOCSLIB.ORG

XCOR Aerospace, Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
XCOR Aerospace, Inc XCOR Aerospace, Inc. …Providing Low Cost, Safe & Responsive Access to Space © 2013© 2013 XCOR XCOR Aerospace, Aerospace, Inc. Inc. All RightsAll Rights Reserved. Reserved. 1 Watch the video: <http://youtu.be/PjzGaSQX0iU> XCOR Aerospace, Inc. …Providing Low Cost, Safe & Responsive Access to Space © 2013© 2013 XCOR XCOR Aerospace, Aerospace, Inc. Inc. All RightsAll Rights Reserved. Reserved. 1 XCOR History Founded in 1999 Located at Mojave Air & Spaceport, CA –Moving to Midland, TX Fourteen different rocket engine designs –Approximately 5,000 firings –Innovative piston pump © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2 History of Rocketry © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5 Wernher von Braun © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 6 History of Rocketry © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 7 Turbopumps High efficiency compression of liquid fuels and oxidizer But... Expensive to design Expensive to build Very expensive to maintain © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 8 Three Phase Pumping 1 Rate of Flow Time 2 Single piston cylinder leads to sinusoidal variation in flow. 1 Rate of Flow Time © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9 Three Phase Pumping 1 Rate of Flow Time 120° offset 2 Adding a second piston cylinder begins to smooth out net fluid flow. Average flow = 1 1 unit/sec Rate of Flow Time © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 10 Three Phase Pumping 1 Rate of Flow Time 120° offset 2 Adding a third piston cylinder smooths out net fluid flow completely. Average flow = 1.5 unit/sec 1 Rate of Flow Time © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 11 Piston Pumps © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 12 Piston Pumps © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 13 Testing Piston Pump Bearings © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 14 XCOR’s Offices © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 15 XCOR’s Team © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 16 XCOR History (continued) Revenue producing Two generations of rocket-powered air vehicles already built & flown Now building suborbital Lynx –FAA-licensed launch vehicle © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2 XCOR Lynx Lynx Overview Suborbital space vehicle Horizontal takeoff/ landing from runway Two seats –Pilot plus one Small vehicle –Wingspan ~24 feet –Length ~30 feet © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 3 19 Lynx Overview Multi-mission capable –In-cockpit experiments –External mount experiments –Test pilot/astronaut training –Upper atmospheric sampling –Nano-satellite launch –Space tourism © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 3 20 Lynx Mockup © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 21 First Lynx Engine © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 22 Lynx Engine Tests © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 23 Lynx Engine Tests © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 24 Lynx Mission Control © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 25 Lynx Cockpit Development © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 26 Lynx Cockpit Development © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 27 Lynx Heritage EZ-Rocket taught us … –Development of safe reusable propulsion –Integration into airframe –Low cost & safe operational procedures –Regulatory frameworkImproved airframe skill sets and EZ-Rocket (2001-2005) avionics integration © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 28 Lynx Heritage X-Racer taught us … –Pump-fed fuel enabled high performance for future operations • 7 sorties/day! –Improved low cost ops and safety regime processes –Improved airframe skill X-Racer (2006-2008) sets and avionics integration © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 29 Lynx Flight Operations © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 30 Lynx Flight Operations Aircraft-like operations –Takeoff/land at any airport with a 7,500-foot (2350 m) runway and appropriate airspace Readily-available fuel (LOX/Kerosene) Fast turnaround Low maintenance –Two-hour engine runtime overhaul intervals Up to 4 suborbital sorties per day © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 31 Suborbital Payloads & People © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 32 Small Satellite Launch to LEO © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 33 Projected Lynx Performance Lynx Mark II Climb to 60,000 feet 1.8 minutes Climb to 100,000 feet 2.3 minutes Climb to 200,000 feet 3.0 minutes Max V Ascent Rate 3190 ft/sec Max Mach Ascent Mach 3.1 Max Mach Descent Mach 3.5 Max G-Force Ascent 2.7 G Max G-Force Descent 4.0 G Thrust/Weight Ratio 2.8 Nominal Apogee 110 km / 68 mi / 350,000 ft © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 34 The View from Lynx Mark I 200,000 feet above Mojave © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 35 The View from Lynx Mark II 350,000 feet above Mojave Von Kármán Line © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 36 Screening & Training Resort Lodging: Thorough Medical Training Seminars 5 days, 4 nights Screening Altitude Chamber G-Force Training Options © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 37 Suborbital Pressure Suit Manufacturer – Orbital Outfitters – http://www.orbitaloutfitters.com Emergency pressure suit for suborbital operations (“get me down suit”) Features: • Life support functions for 30 mins @ 500 K Feet • Mass of <20 Kg • Comfortable for the wearer • Can be integrated into a parachute harness • Visibility which is superior to existing designs • Cooling systems from auto racing & film industry • Automatic rapid activation function • Intuitive to operate • Audio system interface to vehicle © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 38 The Lynx Experience … Watch the video: <http://youtu.be/s5dfi6F6N88> © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 39 Lynx Dimensions Length 27.9 ft 8.51 m Wingspan 24.2 ft 7.37 m Height 7.3 ft (with gear) 2.2 m Wing Area 239 ft2 22.2 m2 Aspect Ratio 2.2 © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 40 Lynx Subsystems Seating: 2-person side-by-side with 9500 ft Aeroshell: cabin pressurization and full pressure suits Lynx I graphite/epoxy Lynx II carbon/cyanate ester Flaps & Drag Brakes: powered LOX Tank: Rudders: Lynx I - Aluminum manual Lynx II - Teflon/S-glass Fuel and LOX tanks Elevons: segmented for CG control boosted manual Pressure Cabin: carbon/epoxy Fuel Tanks: Leading Edges: carbon/epoxy Kovar over silica- composite alumina felt © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 41 Lynx Propulsion Fully reusable –Low touch labor after flights... “refuel and go!” Non-toxic propellants –LOX (Liquid Oxygen) –Kerosene or Methane Unique RCS thrusters –Non-toxic –Proprietary Bi-propellant © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 42 Lynx Internal Payloads © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 43 Lynx Mark II External Payloads © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 44 Lynx Summary Lynx is a multi-mission capable vehicle for suborbital operations carrying … – People to 100 km (space tourism) – Payloads • Microgravity Experiments • Upper Atmospheric Research • Earth Observation • Equipment Test and Certification – Small Satellite Launch (<12kg) to LEO using expendable stage Operational Profile – Capable of up to four sorties per day – Horizontal takeoff and landing – Non-toxic propellants and fully reusable propulsion technology © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 45 XCOR Lynx © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 46 Headed for Texas! © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 47 Headed for Texas! © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 48 ...and, maybe, Georgia? Proposed Spaceport Georgia © 2013 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 49 Disclosures This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, but not limited to, statements as to future operating results and plans that involve risks and uncertainties. We use words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, the negative of these terms and similar expressions to identify forward looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by those projected in the forward-looking statements for any reason. In addition, XCOR operates in highly competitive, consumer, technology-driven and rapidly changing aerospace, government, and civil space businesses. These businesses are affected by government regulation, economic, strategic, political and social conditions, consumer response to new and existing products and services, technological developments and, particularly in view of new technologies, the continued ability to protect intellectual property rights. Also, the industry we are in is risky and dangerous, with a history of catastrophic failures and loss of life. XCOR’s actual results could differ materially from management’s expectations because of changes in such factors or due to accident. This Presentation has been prepared for the purpose of facilitating discussions between the recipient and the Company. While the information in this Presentation is believed to be accurate in all material respects, no representation is made by any party and nothing herein is or shall be relied upon as a promise or representation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Regulatory Role of the Federal Aviation Administration
    The Regulatory Role of the Federal Aviation Federal Aviation Administration Administration Presented to: Legal Subcommittee of the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space By: Laura Montgomery, Senior Attorney, FAA Regulatory Structure • Congress • Executive Branch – Federal Aviation Administration – space transportation – Federal Communications Commissions – space communications – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration – remote sensing from space • Judiciary Federal Aviation 2 2 Administration March 2010 Administrative Procedure Act • Rulemaking • Authorizations: licenses and permits • Adjudication Federal Aviation 3 3 Administration March 2010 Statutory Authority • 49 U.S.C. Subtitle IX, chapter 701 (Ch. 701) – Authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to authorize launch and reentry and operation of launch and reentry sites as carried out by U.S. citizens or within the United States. – Directs the Secretary to • Exercise this responsibility consistent with public health and safety, safety of property, and national security and foreign policy interests of the United States. • Encourage, facilitate and promote commercial space launches and reentries by the private sector. Federal Aviation 4 Administration March 2010 Statutory Mission ELV Air Launch Launch & Reentry Sites RLV Launch & Reentry Sea Launch Human Space Flight Federal Aviation 5 5 Administration March 2010 Types of Launch Sites Oklahoma Spaceport ELV California Spaceport Sea Launch Florida Kodiak Launch Spaceport Complex Mid-Atlantic Mojave Air
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Initiative for Space Tourism
    UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA FACULTY OF ECONOMICS MASTER’S THESIS “OUT OF THIS WORLD” BUSINESS: CORPORATE INITIATIVE FOR SPACE TOURISM Ljubljana, March 2014 JAN KRIŠTOF RAMOVŠ AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT The undersigned Jan K. Ramovš, a student at the University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Economics, (hereafter: FELU), declare that I am the author of the master’s thesis entitled “Out Of This World” Business: Corporate Initiative for Space Tourism, written under supervision of Prof. Dr. Metka Tekavčič. In accordance with the Copyright and Related Rights Act (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, Nr. 21/1995 with changes and amendments) I allow the text of my master’s thesis to be published on the FELU website. I further declare the text of my master’s thesis to be based on the results of my own research; the text of my master’s thesis to be language-edited and technically in adherence with the FELU’s Technical Guidelines for Written Works which means that I o cited and / or quoted works and opinions of other authors in my master’s thesis in accordance with the FELU’s Technical Guidelines for Written Works and o obtained (and referred to in my master’s thesis) all the necessary permits to use the works of other authors which are entirely (in written or graphical form) used in my text; to be aware of the fact that plagiarism (in written or graphical form) is a criminal offence and can be prosecuted in accordance with the Criminal Code (Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, Nr. 55/2008 with changes and amendments); to be aware of the consequences a proven plagiarism charge based on the submitted master’s thesis could have for my status at the FELU in accordance with the relevant FELU Rules on Master’s Thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Launch Vehicles a 2015 State of the Industry Survey Carlos Niederstrasser
    Small Launch Vehicles A 2015 State of the Industry Survey Carlos Niederstrasser An update to this survey will be presented at the 2016 Internaonal Astronau9cal Congress 1 Agenda Overview of Small Launch Vehicles Launch Method/Locations Launch Performance Projected Launch Costs Individual Rocket Details Copyright © 2015 by Orbital ATK, Inc. 2 Listing Criteria Have a maximum capability to LEO of 1000 kg (definition of LEO left to the LV provider). The effort must be for the development of an entire launch vehicle system (with the exception of carrier aircraft for air launch vehicles). Mentioned through a web site update, social media, traditional media, conference paper, press release, etc. sometime after 2010. Have a stated goal of completing a fully operational space launch (orbital) vehicle. Funded concept or feasibility studies by government agencies, patents for new launch methods, etc., do not qualify. Expect to be widely available commercially or to the U.S. Government No specific indication that the effort has been cancelled, closed, or otherwise disbanded. Correc&ons, addi&ons, and comments are welcomed and encouraged! Copyright © 2015 by Orbital ATK, Inc. 3 We did not … … Talk to the individual companies … Rely on any proprietary/confidential information … Verify accuracy of data found in public resources Ø Primarily relied on companies’ web sites Funding sources, when listed, are not implied to be the vehicles sole or even majority funding source. We do not make any value judgements on technical or financial credibility
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Suborbital Science Through Better Understanding of Wind Effects
    Space Traffic Management Conference 2019 Progress through Collaboration Feb 26th, 11:00 AM Enhancing suborbital science through better understanding of wind effects Pedro Llanos Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach, [email protected] Diane Howard University of Texas at Austin Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/stm Part of the Aviation and Space Education Commons, Educational Technology Commons, Operational Research Commons, and the Space Vehicles Commons Llanos, Pedro and Howard, Diane, "Enhancing suborbital science through better understanding of wind effects" (2019). Space Traffic Management Conference. 25. https://commons.erau.edu/stm/2019/presentations/25 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Space Traffic Management Conference by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Enhancing suborbital science through better understanding of wind effects Pedro Llanos,1 and Diane Howard2 Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, Florida, 32114, USA This paper highlights the importance of understanding some key factors, such as winds effects, trajectory and vehicle parameters variations in order to streamline the space vehicle operations and enhance science in the upper mesosphere at about 85 km. Understanding these effects is crucial to refine current space operations and establish more robust procedures. These procedures will involve training new space operators to conduct and coordinate space operations in class E above FL600 airspace within the Air Traffic Organization (ATO). Space vehicles such as Space Ship Two can spend up to 6 minutes in class E airspace above FL600 after launch.
    [Show full text]
  • Dominant Suborbital Space Tourism Architectures
    Dominant Suborbital Space Tourism Architectures The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Guerster, Markus and Edward F. Crawley. "Dominant Suborbital Space Tourism Architectures." Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 56, 5 (September 2019): dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.a34385 As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.a34385 Publisher American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) Version Author's final manuscript Citable link https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/126666 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS Dominant Suborbital Space Tourism Architectures Markus Guerster∗ and Edward F. Crawley† Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 DOI: 10.2514/1.A34385 In the early stages of maturity of a system built for a specific function, it is common for the solutions to lie in a broad architectural space, in which numerous concepts are being developed, built, and tested. As the product matures, certain concepts become more dominant. This pattern can currently be observed in the suborbital tourism industry, in which the obvious question is what system architecture will provide the best combination of cost and safety and in the long run become the dominant architecture. This paper addresses this question by defining a broad architectural space of thousands of possibilities and exploring it comprehensively. We identified 33 feasible architectures, 26 of which had not been proposed earlier. A genetic algorithm optimizes each architecture with respect to the launch mass (a proxy for cost) and operational safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Planes and Space Tourism: the Industry and the Regulation of Its Safety
    Space Planes and Space Tourism: The Industry and the Regulation of its Safety A Research Study Prepared by Dr. Joseph N. Pelton Director, Space & Advanced Communications Research Institute George Washington University George Washington University SACRI Research Study 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………… p 4-14 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. p 16-26 2.0 Methodology…………………………………………………………………….. p 26-28 3.0 Background and History……………………………………………………….. p 28-34 4.0 US Regulations and Government Programs………………………………….. p 34-35 4.1 NASA’s Legislative Mandate and the New Space Vision………….……. p 35-36 4.2 NASA Safety Practices in Comparison to the FAA……….…………….. p 36-37 4.3 New US Legislation to Regulate and Control Private Space Ventures… p 37 4.3.1 Status of Legislation and Pending FAA Draft Regulations……….. p 37-38 4.3.2 The New Role of Prizes in Space Development…………………….. p 38-40 4.3.3 Implications of Private Space Ventures…………………………….. p 41-42 4.4 International Efforts to Regulate Private Space Systems………………… p 42 4.4.1 International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety… p 42-43 4.4.2 The International Telecommunications Union (ITU)…………….. p 43-44 4.4.3 The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS).. p 44 4.4.4 The European Aviation Safety Agency…………………………….. p 44-45 4.4.5 Review of International Treaties Involving Space………………… p 45 4.4.6 The ICAO -The Best Way Forward for International Regulation.. p 45-47 5.0 Key Efforts to Estimate the Size of a Private Space Tourism Business……… p 47 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 January 2017 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 i Contents About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2017) Publication produced for FAA AST by The Tauri Group under contract. NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 GENERAL CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 Launch Vehicles 9 Launch and Reentry Sites 21 Payloads 35 2016 Launch Events 39 2017 Annual Commercial Space Transportation Forecast 45 Space Transportation Law and Policy 83 Appendices 89 Orbital Launch Vehicle Fact Sheets 100 iii Contents DETAILED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .
    [Show full text]
  • Greason, CEO XCOR Aerospace February 18, 2010
    Providing Low Cost Access to Space REM Capabilities of The Lynx Suborbital Vehicle Presentation to Next-Generation Suborbital Researchers Conference February 18, 2010 1 © 2010 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All RightsProprietary Reserved. & Confidential Proprietary to XCORto XCOR Aerospace Aerospace, (See Inc. Last No Slide) Third Party Disclosure Allowable. 1 Lynx Overview … • Suborbital space vehicle • Horizontal takeoff/landing • Two seats – pilot plus one • Small vehicle – Wingspan ~24 feet – Length ~30 feet • Multi-mission capable – In-cockpit experiments – External mount experiments – Test pilot/astronaut training – Upper atmospheric sampling – Microsatellite launch © 2010– XCORSpace Aerospace, tourism Inc. All Rights Reserved. Proprietary to XCOR Aerospace, Inc. No Third Party Disclosure Allowable. 2 Lynx Heritage … • EZ Rocket taught us … – Development of safe EZ-Rocket (2001-2005) reusable propulsion – Integration into airframe – Low cost & safe operational procedures – Regulatory framework • X-Racer taught us … – Pump fed fuel enabled high performance for future ops – Improved low cost ops and safety regime processes – Improved airframe skill sets and avionics integration X-Racer (2006-2008) © 2010 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Proprietary to XCOR Aerospace, Inc. No Third Party Disclosure Allowable. 3 Lynx: Mark I • Horizontal takeoff/landing • 61 km (200,000 ft) peak altitude • Mach 2.4 top speed • First flight in 2011 © 2010 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Proprietary to XCOR Aerospace, Inc. No Third Party Disclosure Allowable. 4 LYNX Mark II • Follows Mark I by 9-18 months • ~5000 flight life • Mach 3.5, over 100 km • Can launch two stage to LEO ~10kg © 2010 XCOR Aerospace, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Proprietary to XCOR Aerospace, Inc. No Third Party Disclosure Allowable.
    [Show full text]
  • Forging Commercial Confidence
    SPACEPORT UK: AHEAD FORGING WITH COMMERCIAL CONFIDENCE Copyright © Satellite Applications Catapult Ltd 2014. SPACEPORT UK: FORGING AHEAD WITH COMMERCIAL CONFIDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 07 2 DEMAND FORECAST 11 • Commercial human spaceflight • Very high speed point to point travel • Satellite deployment • Microgravity research • Other commercial demand 3 SPACEPORT FACILITIES 47 • Core infrastructure required • Spaceflight preparation and training • Tours/visitor centre • Space campus • Key findings 4 WIDER ECONOMIC IMPACT 57 • Summary • Site development • Employment • Tourism • R&D/education • Key findings 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT 67 • Unlocking commercial potential 6 RISKS 73 • Accidents • Single operator • Local opposition 7 FINANCING 77 • Existing scenario • Potential funding sources • Other sources of funds • Insurance • Key findings Appendices 85 • Appendix A • Appendix B Acknowledgements and contact information 89 5 Spaceport UK: A pillar of growth for the UK and European space industry, enabling lower cost access to space, and creating economic benefit far beyond its perimeter fence. A spaceport will unlock economic growth and jobs in existing UK industries and regions, while positioning the UK to take advantage of emerging demand for commercial human spaceflight, small satellite launch, microgravity research, parabolic flights, near-space balloon tourism, and eventually high-speed point-to-point travel. Without a specific site selected and looking at the economic impact of a spaceport generically, this report expects the spaceport to deliver approximately £2.5bn and 8,000 jobs to the broader UK economy over 10 years. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Executive Summary Our plan is for Britain to have a fully functional, operating spaceport “by 2018. This would serve as a European focal point for the pioneers of commercial spaceflight using the potential of spaceflight experience companies like Virgin Galactic, XCOR and Swiss S3 to pave the way for satellite launch services to follow.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Perspectives of Hypersonic Systems and Technologies with Emphasis on the Role of Sub-Orbital Flight ∗ S
    Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio, The Journal of Aerospace Science, Technology and Systems Status and Perspectives of Hypersonic Systems and Technologies with Emphasis on the Role of Sub-Orbital Flight ∗ S. Chiesaa, G. Russob, M. Fioritia, S. Corpinoa a Politecnico di Torino Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering b AIDAA Sez. Napoletana c/o Department of Industrial Engineering \Federico II" - University of Naples Abstract The relevance and the main features of Hypersonic Flight are shortly presented and discussed. A synthetic overview of the few realisations and of many studies, projects and technological demonstrators offers opportunity of point out many interesting aspects. Then the more actual realisations and studies are considered, with particular attention to the new sector of small suborbital planes for Space Tourism. That gives opportunity of proposing a Road Map for an affordable and logic development of Hypersonic Flight, passing through the development of a suborbital Space Tourism plane on the basis of an existing subsonic business jet. Then the suborbital plane will constitute the basis of developing an Hypersonic Cruise Business Jet and, as a next step, a TSTO. 1. Introduction 2. Hypersonic Flight Concept The hypersonic flight is a subject on which the ef- It is considered appropriate to establish a definition forts of basic and applied aerospace research have been of hypersonic aircraft, useful to define the topic of dis- focused over the years. These efforts consisted in cussion; we define hypersonic aircraft a system capable the development of several projects and correspond- of taking off and landing horizontally (HOTOL - Hori- ing technological fields, such as aerodynamics, propul- zontal Take Off and Landing), and capable of flying at sion, structures capable of withstanding high thermal a Mach higher than 4.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Options and Optimization of Suborbital Space Tourism Vehicles Markus Guerster Edward F
    Architectural Options and Optimization of Suborbital Space Tourism Vehicles Markus Guerster Edward F. Crawley System Architecture Lab, MIT System Architecture Lab, MIT 77 Massachusetts Avenue. 77 Massachusetts Avenue. Cambridge, MA 02139 Cambridge, MA 02139 857-999-6103 617-230-6604 [email protected] [email protected] Abstract— Since the creation of the Ansari X-Prize, a significant The birth of the suborbital space tourism dates to May 1996, technical and commercial interest has developed in suborbital where the Ansari XPrize was launched by the Ansari family. space tourism. An obvious question arises: what system This competition challenged teams all around the world to architecture will provide the best combination of cost and safety build a reusable, private-funded and manned spaceship. The for the performance defined by the prize? The objective of this first team carrying three people to 100 km above the Earth’s paper is to address this question, by defining the design space and searching comprehensively through it with respect to surface twice within two weeks received the $10 million launch mass (a proxy for cost) and safety. We have identified 33 price. 26 teams from 7 nations proposed their concept. architectures and visualized them in a single table. Of these, 26 Finally, the Mojave Aerospace Ventures team, which was led have not earlier been proposed. A genetic algorithm optimized by Burt Rutan and his company Scaled Composites and each of these 33 architectures for launch mass and safety. The financed from Paul Allen, won the competition on October 4, launch mass was calculated by a design framework consisting of 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Weather Impacts and Needs for Future Commercial Space
    Space Weather Impacts Federal Aviation Administration and Needs for Future Commercial Space Operations Karen Shelton-Mur FAA/Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST) Space Transportation Development Division Space Weather Workshop (SWW), April 24-27, 2012 Agenda •FAA/AST’s Background and Authority •Commercial Space Transportation (CST) Activity •Emerging Science Payload Market •SWx Considerations for CST Operations •How to Prepare for Future Commercial Spaceflight •FAA/AST Space Weather Initiatives •Conclusion 1 Karen Shelton-Mur Federal Aviation SWW, April 24, 2012 Administration 1 Background • The U.S. space program today has 3 sectors: – Civil – Military – Commercial • The commercial sector was created in 1984 with the passage of the Commercial Space Launch Act; and • Regulatory oversight for the commercial sector was delegated to the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation (AST). • Today, AST makes up one of the three lines of business within the FAA. Karen Shelton-Mur Federal Aviation SWW, April 24, 2012 Administration 2 DOT Authority: Title 51 U.S. Code Subtitle V, Ch. 509 • Protect the public, property, and the national security and foreign policy interests of the U.S • Oversee and coordinate commercial launch and reentry operations including those with crew and space flight participants. • Issue permits and licenses and transfer licenses authorizing those operations. • Promote economic growth and entrepreneurial activity through the use of the space environment for peaceful purposes. • Encourage the
    [Show full text]