Kamehameha Iii's Defense of the Hawaiian Kingdom in The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kamehameha Iii's Defense of the Hawaiian Kingdom in The LITERACY, STATECRAFT AND SOVEREIGNTY: KAMEHAMEHA III’S DEFENSE OF THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM IN THE 1840s A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERITY OF HAWAIʻI AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN HISTORY MAY 2019 By Janetta Susan Corley Dissertation Committee: David A. Chappell, Chairperson David Hanlon Fabio López Lázaro Yuma Totani Jeffrey Kapali Lyon ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I extend my thanks to each member of my committee for providing me with the assistance that has brought me through the educational process to the completion of my dissertation. Yuma Totani gave me early encouragement and support; Kapali Lyon worked tirelessly to ensure the development of my Hawaiian language skills; Fabio López Lázaro offered important advice that contributed to the early direction of my research; and David Hanlon extended his counsel and support throughout my educational journey. It is David Chappell, however, to whom I am most deeply indebted for bringing this dissertation to completion. Dr. Chappell freely gave of his time, professional experience, and advice to give me needed direction and thoughtful suggestions for improvement that have added immeasurably to my research. I also am deeply grateful to history professors Matthew Lauzon and James Kraft for their kind assistance and support. Sue Carlson also gave freely of her time and support. Barbara Dunn at the Hawaiian Historical Society and all staff members at the Hawaii State Archives also provided helpful suggestions and warm encouragement as I worked my way through their archival collections. Classmates Shirley Buchanan, Catherine Ulep, and Uluwehi Hopkins inspired and heartened me at particular points when I needed it the most. Encouragement and support from my family carried me through as I worked to complete this dissertation. I am most grateful for the love and support of my husband, W. G. Corley. ii ABSTRACT Kamehameha III’s struggle for sovereign control of his kingdom began in earnest in 1842 when he sent his diplomats on their long journey to confront the world’s greatest maritime powers in their own capitals. His struggle began several years before that, however, when as a young boy he pronounced that his rule would be characterized by literacy, and he ordered his people to learn to read and write. Without literacy, Kauikeaouli could not have defended his sovereign rights and privileges in the public forums of his opponents—and without literacy, there would be no record from the king himself how he chose to meet the threats that confronted his kingdom. Although Kamehameha III (r. 1825-1854) secured guarantees of territorial sovereignty in 1843-1844 from Great Britain, France and the United States, those guarantees did not preclude western agents’ attempts to limit the king’s ability to exercise his sovereign powers by imposing extraterritorial restrictions over key economic and juridical functions. Kamehameha III recognized that his loss of authority to exercise functional powers threatened the Hawaiian kingdom’s ability to retain its territorial sovereignty. Western opponents already had a foothold in the kingdom, and the king needed innovative tactics and strategies to prevail in his struggle. This dissertation examines the comprehensive strategy that Kamehameha III devised to retake full sovereign control of Hawaiian kingdom governance. Documentary evidence demonstrates that the king collaborated with his chiefs, ministers and legislators to implement specific governance, political and diplomatic measures. Kamehameha III’s tactics worked in tandem to structure the kingdom’s political interactions with western nation-states in ways that would restore power and authority to the Hawaiian government and secure continued independence. iii This dissertation explores kingdom governance records and other contemporary evidence about each of the measures taken, the king’s rationale for selecting the specific measure, its implementation, and its effectiveness. These records easily disprove accusations contemporary to his times that Kamehameha III’s ministers ruled in his stead. This examination contributes to a reevaluation of Kamehameha III’s leadership role and an expanded understanding of the threats and opportunities presented him during his reign. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . ii ABSTRACT . iii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS . .. viii ORTHOGRAPHY AND TRANSLATIONS . ix REMEMBERING KAUIKEAOULI. xiv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION: A NATION IMPERILED . 1 The solution . 5 The strategy . 6 Sources . 9 Historiography . .13 Analysis . .. 24 CHAPTER 2 LITERACY AS STRATEGY . 30 Traditional messaging methods . 31 Evangelism and literacy . 32 ABCFM missionaries begin work . 40 Learning to read and write . 45 Kauikeaouli’s royal command . 49 An explosion of learning . 53 Written framework adopted for governance structure . 60 Literacy secured sovereign recognition . 67 CHAPTER 3 CHANGING HAWAIʻI IN THE 1840s . .72 Hybrid governance . 73 Whites become Hawaiian citizens. 84 v Population changes . 87 Commerce and urban growth . 92 Land tenure restrictions impede agricultural growth . 98 Labor scarcities further threaten agriculture . 102 CHAPTER 4 WESTERN-EDUCATED MINISTERS DEFEND SOVEREIGN RIGHTS . .108 Treaties of unequal alliance . 110 Rationale for the hiring policy . 117 Harsh criticism of the policy . 123 Suspicions of a conspiracy . 129 Kauikeaouli personally responds . .133 In summary . 141 CHAPTER 5 LEGAL AND LAND REFORMS . 144 Turning points . .145 Paulet, the laws, and Kauikeaouli . .150 Britain expands extraterritorial legal restrictions . 153 Decision points . 156 Kauikeaouli initiates law and land reforms . .158 Establishing the framework for both reforms . 164 Judicial reforms are accomplished . 167 Land tenure reforms are accomplished . 171 The aftermath . .174 CHAPTER 6 TACTICAL USE OF PRINT MEDIA. .178 The Polynesian rejoins the public forum. 179 Publishing to the world. .184 Kauikeaouli sets the publication policy. 192 vi The government press broadens its reach. .197 An opposition press begins publishing. .201 Measuring success. 208 CHAPTER 7 TREATIES AND SECRET ORDERS . .. 212 Extraterritorial terms depress revenues . 213 “The French Outrage” . 217 A plan and secret orders . 223 The French provoke new secret orders . 230 Filibusters spark new negotiations . 238 International support materializes . 246 Gregg’s final inducement . .248 Afterthoughts . 250 CHAPTER 8 CONCLUSION: SOVEREIGNTY SECURED . .253 Phase one: the tools . 255 Phase two: the reforms . .263 Phase three: negotiate fair treaties . ..
Recommended publications
  • Congressional -Reoord-Senate.' 6689
    1898.· CONGRESSIONAL -REOORD-SENATE.' 6689 Also, a bill (H. R.10888) to authorize the raising of 40,000 colored SENATE. troops-to the Committee on Military Affairs. By Mr. ALDRICH: A bill (H. R. 10889) to punish offenses WEDNESDAY, July 6, 1898. against the elective franchise-to the Committee on Election of The Senate met at 11 o'clock a. m. President, Vice-President, and Representatives in Congress. Prayer by Rev. E. L. WATSON, of the city of Washington. By Mr. SKINNER: A bill (H. R. 10902) to provide for the On motion of Mr. WOLCOTT, and by unanimous consent, the authorization of a regiment of volunteer mounted infantry-to reading of the Journal of yesterday's proceedings was dispensed the Committee on Military Affairs. with. By Mr. BERRY: A joint resolution (H. Res. 293) tendering the REPORTS OF COMMITTEES. thanks of Congress to Commodore Schley, United States Navy, • and the officers and men under his command-to the Committee Mr. FAIRBANKS, from the Committee on Claims, to whom on Naval Affairs. was referred the bill (S. 1612) for the relief of the heirs of Henry By Mr. ROBERTSON of Louisiana: A memorial of the legisla­ Leef, deceased, owner of the bark Ma1·y Teresa, illegally seized ture of the State of Louisiana, concerning the improvement of by Alexander H. Tyler, consul of the United States at Bahia, Bayou Courtableau, in that State-to the Committee on Rivers Brazil, submitted an adverse report thereon, which was agreed and Harbors. to; and the bill was postponed indefinitely. Mr. CHILTON, from the Committee on the Judiciary, to whom was referred the bill (H.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICA's ANNEXATION of HAWAII by BECKY L. BRUCE
    A LUSCIOUS FRUIT: AMERICA’S ANNEXATION OF HAWAII by BECKY L. BRUCE HOWARD JONES, COMMITTEE CHAIR JOSEPH A. FRY KARI FREDERICKSON LISA LIDQUIST-DORR STEVEN BUNKER A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2012 Copyright Becky L. Bruce 2012 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT This dissertation argues that the annexation of Hawaii was not the result of an aggressive move by the United States to gain coaling stations or foreign markets, nor was it a means of preempting other foreign nations from acquiring the island or mending a psychic wound in the United States. Rather, the acquisition was the result of a seventy-year relationship brokered by Americans living on the islands and entered into by two nations attempting to find their place in the international system. Foreign policy decisions by both nations led to an increasingly dependent relationship linking Hawaii’s stability to the U.S. economy and the United States’ world power status to its access to Hawaiian ports. Analysis of this seventy-year relationship changed over time as the two nations evolved within the world system. In an attempt to maintain independence, the Hawaiian monarchy had introduced a westernized political and economic system to the islands to gain international recognition as a nation-state. This new system created a highly partisan atmosphere between natives and foreign residents who overthrew the monarchy to preserve their personal status against a rising native political challenge. These men then applied for annexation to the United States, forcing Washington to confront the final obstacle in its rise to first-tier status: its own reluctance to assume the burdens and responsibilities of an imperial policy abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Proper Attitude of Resistance”
    Library of Congress, sn84026366 “A Proper Attitude of Resistance” The Oregon Letters of A.H. Francis to Frederick Douglass, 1851–1860 PRIMARY DOCUMENT by Kenneth Hawkins BETWEEN 1851 AND 1860, A.H. Francis wrote over a dozen letters to his friend Frederick Douglass, documenting systemic racism and supporting Black rights. Douglass I: “A PROPER ATTITUDE OF RESISTANCE” 1831–1851 published those letters in his newspapers, The North Star and Frederick Douglass’ Paper. The November 20, 1851, issue of Frederick Douglass’ Paper is shown here. In September 1851, when A.H. Francis flourished. The debate over whether and his brother I.B. Francis had just to extend slavery to Oregon contin- immigrated from New York to Oregon ued through the decade, eventually and set up a business on Front Street entangling A.H. in a political feud in Portland, a judge ordered them to between Portland’s Whig newspaper, in letters to Black newspapers, Francis 200 White Oregonians (who signed a leave the territory. He found them in the Oregonian, edited by Thomas explored the American Revolution’s petition to the territorial legislature on violation of Oregon’s Black exclusion Dryer, and Oregon’s Democratic party legacy of rights for Blacks, opposed their behalf), the brothers successfully law, which barred free and mixed-race organ in Salem, the Oregon States- schemes to colonize Africa with free resisted the chief Supreme Court jus- Black people from residence and man, edited by Asahel Bush.2 Francis American Black people, and extolled tice’s expulsion order and negotiated most civil rights. A.H. had been an also continued his collaboration with the opportunities available through accommodations to succeed on the active abolitionist in New York for two Douglass through a series of letters economic uplift and immigration to the far periphery of what Thomas Jefferson decades, working most recently with that Douglass published between American West.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland City Council Agenda
    CITY OF OFFICIAL PORTLAND, OREGON MINUTES A REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORTLAND, OREGON WAS HELD THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2018 AT 9:30 A.M. THOSE PRESENT WERE: Mayor Wheeler, Presiding; Commissioners Eudaly, Fish, Fritz and Saltzman, 5. OFFICERS IN ATTENDANCE: Karla Moore-Love, Clerk of the Council; Karen Moynahan, Chief Deputy City Attorney; Heidi Brown, Senior Deputy City Attorney at 1:35 p.m.; and Nicholas Livingston and John Paolazzi, Sergeants at Arms. Item No. 633 was pulled for discussion and on a Y-5 roll call, the balance of the Consent Agenda was adopted. The meeting recessed at 12:23 p.m. and reconvened at 12:30 p.m. Disposition: COMMUNICATIONS 622 Request of Dee White to address Council regarding chronically dangerous levels of lead in our drinking water (Communication) PLACED ON FILE 623 Request of David Kif Davis to address Council regarding City sponsored political terrorism (Communication) PLACED ON FILE 624 Request of Kevin Fitts to address Council regarding elderly/disabled centered housing policies in low income housing (Communication) PLACED ON FILE 625 Request of Paul Watts, Graffiti Removal Services to address Council regarding progress report on graffiti removal program (Communication) PLACED ON FILE June 13-14, 2018 TIMES CERTAIN 626 TIME CERTAIN: 9:45 AM – Add a new per night fee assessed on Booking Agents or Transient Lodging Intermediaries for the privilege of facilitating a Short-Term Rental Occupancy (Ordinance introduced by Mayor Wheeler and Commissioner Fish; add Code Chapter 6.09) 45 minutes requested for items 626 and 627 PASSED TO Motion that the funds will go directly to the Housing SECOND READING Investment Fund and amend ordinance and impact statement AS AMENDED accordingly: Moved by Wheeler and seconded by Fish.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hawaiian Military Transformation from 1770 to 1796
    4 The Hawaiian Military Transformation from 1770 to 1796 In How Chiefs Became Kings, Patrick Kirch argues that the Hawaiian polities witnessed by James Cook were archaic states characterised by: the development of class stratification, land alienation from commoners and a territorial system of administrative control, a monopoly of force and endemic conquest warfare, and, most important, divine kingship legitimated by state cults with a formal priesthood.1 The previous chapter questioned the degree to which chiefly authority relied on the consent of the majority based on the belief in the sacred status of chiefs as opposed to secular coercion to enforce compliance. This chapter questions the nature of the monopoly of coercion that Kirch and most commentators ascribed to chiefs. It is argued that military competition forced changes in the composition and tactics of chiefly armies that threatened to undermine the basis of chiefly authority. Mass formations operating in drilled unison came to increasingly figure alongside individual warriors and chiefs’ martial prowess as decisive factors in battle. Gaining military advantage against chiefly rivals came at the price of increasing reliance on lesser ranked members of ones’ own communities. This altered military relationship in turn influenced political and social relations in ways that favoured rule based more on the consent and cooperation of the ruled than the threat of coercion against them for noncompliance. As armies became larger and stayed in the field 1 Kirch (2010), p. 27. 109 TRANSFORMING Hawai‘I longer, the logistics of adequate and predictable agricultural production and supply became increasingly important and the outcome of battles came to be less decisive.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Islands Program
    / '", ... it PACIFIC ISLANDS PROGRAM ! University of Hawaii j Miscellaneous Work Papers 1974:1 . BIBLIOGRAPHY OF HAWAIIAN LANGUAGE MATERIALS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII, MANOA CAMPUS Second Printing, 1979 Photocopy, Summer 1986 ,i ~ Foreword Each year the Pacific Islands Program plans to duplicate inexpensively a few work papers whose contents appear to justify a wider distribution than that of classroom contact or intra-University circulation. For the most part, they will consist of student papers submitted in academic courses and which, in their respective ways, represent a contribution to existing knowledge of the Pacific. Their subjects will be as varied as is the multi-disciplinary interests of the Program and the wealth of cooperation received from the many Pacific-interested members of the University faculty and the cooperating com­ munity. Pacific Islands Program Room 5, George Hall Annex 8 University of Hawaii • PRELIMINARY / BIBLIOGRAPHY OF HAWAIIAN LANGUAGE MATERIALS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII, MANOA CAMPUS Compiled by Nancy Jane Morris Verna H. F. Young Kehau Kahapea Velda Yamanaka , . • Revised 1974 Second Printing, 1979 PREFACE The Hawaiian Collection of the University of Hawaii Library is perhaps the world's largest, numbering more than 50,000 volumes. As students of the Hawaiian language, we have a particular interest in the Hawaiian language texts in the Collection. Up to now, however, there has been no single master list or file through which to gain access to all the Hawaiian language materials. This is an attempt to provide such list. We culled the bibliographical information from the Hawaiian Collection Catalog and the Library she1flists. We attempted to gather together all available materials in the Hawaiian language, on all subjects, whether imprinted on paper or microfilm, on tape or phonodisc.
    [Show full text]
  • (Letters from California, the Foreign Land) Kānaka Hawai'i Agency A
    He Mau Palapala Mai Kalipōnia Mai, Ka ʻĀina Malihini (Letters from California, the Foreign Land) Kānaka Hawai’i Agency and Identity in the Eastern Pacific (1820-1900) By April L. Farnham A thesis submitted to Sonoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in History Committee Members: Dr. Michelle Jolly, Chair Dr. Margaret Purser Dr. Robert Chase Date: December 13, 2019 i Copyright 2019 By April L. Farnham ii Authorization for Reproduction of Master’s Thesis Permission to reproduce this thesis in its entirety must be obtained from me. Date: December 13, 2019 April L. Farnham Signature iii He Mau Palapala Mai Kalipōnia Mai, Ka ʻĀina Malihini (Letters from California, the Foreign Land) Kānaka Hawai’i Agency and Identity in the Eastern Pacific (1820-1900) Thesis by April L. Farnham ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is to explore the ways in which working-class Kānaka Hawai’i (Hawaiian) immigrants in the nineteenth century repurposed and repackaged precontact Hawai’i strategies of accommodation and resistance in their migration towards North America and particularly within California. The arrival of European naturalists, American missionaries, and foreign merchants in the Hawaiian Islands is frequently attributed for triggering this diaspora. However, little has been written about why Hawaiian immigrants themselves chose to migrate eastward across the Pacific or their reasons for permanent settlement in California. Like the ali’i on the Islands, Hawaiian commoners in the diaspora exercised agency in their accommodation and resistance to Pacific imperialism and colonialism as well. Blending labor history, religious history, and anthropology, this thesis adopts an interdisciplinary and ethnohistorical approach that utilizes Hawaiian-language newspapers, American missionary letters, and oral histories from California’s indigenous peoples.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaiʻi's Big Five
    Hawaiʻi’s Big Five (Plus 2) “By 1941, every time a native Hawaiian switched on his lights, turned on the gas or rode on a street car, he paid a tiny tribute into Big Five coffers.” (Alexander MacDonald, 1944) The story of Hawaii’s largest companies dominates Hawaiʻi’s economic history. Since the early/mid- 1800s, until relatively recently, five major companies emerged and dominated the Island’s economic framework. Their common trait: they were focused on agriculture - sugar. They became known as the Big Five: C. Brewer (1826;) Theo H. Davies (1845;) Amfac - starting as Hackfeld & Company (1849;) Castle & Cooke (1851) and Alexander & Baldwin (1870.) C. Brewer & Co. Amfac Founded: October 1826; Capt. James Hunnewell Founded: 1849; Heinrich Hackfeld and Johann (American Sea Captain, Merchant; Charles Carl Pflueger (German Merchants) Brewer was American Merchant) Incorporated: 1897 (H Hackfeld & Co;) American Incorporated: February 7, 1883 Factors Ltd, 1918 Theo H. Davies & Co. Castle & Cooke Founded: 1845; James and John Starkey, and Founded: 1851; Samuel Northrup Castle and Robert C. Janion (English Merchants; Theophilus Amos Starr Cooke (American Mission Secular Harris Davies was Welch Merchant) Agents) Incorporated: January 1894 Incorporated: 1894 Alexander & Baldwin Founded: 1870; Samuel Thomas Alexander & Henry Perrine Baldwin (American, Sons of Missionaries) Incorporated: 1900 © 2017 Ho‘okuleana LLC The Making of the Big Five Some suggest they were started by the missionaries. Actually, only Castle & Cooke has direct ties to the mission. However, Castle ran the ‘depository’ and Cooke was a teacher, neither were missionary ministers. Alexander & Baldwin were sons of missionaries, but not a formal part of the mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture, Power, and Community in Kaupō, Maui
    On the Cloak of Kings: Agriculture, Power, and Community in Kaupō, Maui By Alexander Underhill Baer A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Patrick V. Kirch Professor Kent G. Lightfoot Professor Anthony R. Byrne Spring 2015 On the Cloak of Kings: Agriculture, Power, and Community in Kaupō, Maui Copyright © 2015 By Alexander Underhill Baer Table of Contents List of Figures iv List of Tables viii Acknowledgements x CHAPTER I: OPENING THE WATERS OF KAUPŌ Introduction 1 Kaupō’s Natural and Historical Settings 3 Geography and Environment 4 Regional Ethnohistory 5 Plan of the Dissertation 7 CHAPTER 2: UNDERSTANDING KAUPŌ: THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF POWER AND PRODUCTION Introduction 9 Last of the Primary States 10 Of Chiefdoms and States 12 Us Versus Them: Evolutionism Prior to 1960 14 The Evolution Revolution: Evolutionism and the New Archaeology 18 Evolution Evolves: Divergent Approaches from the 1990s Through Today 28 Agriculture and Production in the Development of Social Complexity 32 Lay of the Landscape 36 CHAPTER 3: MAPPING HISTORY: KAUPŌ IN MAPS AND THE MAHELE Introduction 39 Social and Spatial Organization in Polynesia 40 Breaking with the Past: New Forms of Social Organization and Land Distribution 42 The Great Mahele 47 Historic Maps of Hawaiʻi and Kaupō 51 Kalama Map, 1838 55 Hawaiian Government Surveys and Maps 61 Post-Mapping: Kaupō Land
    [Show full text]
  • Liminal Encounters and the Missionary Position: New England's Sexual Colonization of the Hawaiian Islands, 1778-1840
    University of Southern Maine USM Digital Commons All Theses & Dissertations Student Scholarship 2014 Liminal Encounters and the Missionary Position: New England's Sexual Colonization of the Hawaiian Islands, 1778-1840 Anatole Brown MA University of Southern Maine Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/etd Part of the Other American Studies Commons Recommended Citation Brown, Anatole MA, "Liminal Encounters and the Missionary Position: New England's Sexual Colonization of the Hawaiian Islands, 1778-1840" (2014). All Theses & Dissertations. 62. https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/etd/62 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at USM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of USM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LIMINAL ENCOUNTERS AND THE MISSIONARY POSITION: NEW ENGLAND’S SEXUAL COLONIZATION OF THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS, 1778–1840 ________________________ A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTERS OF THE ARTS THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE AMERICAN AND NEW ENGLAND STUDIES BY ANATOLE BROWN _____________ 2014 FINAL APPROVAL FORM THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE AMERICAN AND NEW ENGLAND STUDIES June 20, 2014 We hereby recommend the thesis of Anatole Brown entitled “Liminal Encounters and the Missionary Position: New England’s Sexual Colonization of the Hawaiian Islands, 1778 – 1840” Be accepted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Professor Ardis Cameron (Advisor) Professor Kent Ryden (Reader) Accepted Dean, College of Arts, Humanities, and Social Sciences ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis has been churning in my head in various forms since I started the American and New England Studies Masters program at The University of Southern Maine.
    [Show full text]
  • Commemorating the Hawaiian Mission Bicentennial
    Hawaiian Mission Bicentennial Commemorating the Hawaiian Mission Bicentennial The Second Great Awakening was a Protestant religious revival during the early 19th-century in the United States. During this time, several missionary societies were formed. The American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABCFM) was organized under Calvinist ecumenical auspices at Bradford, Massachusetts, on the June 29, 1810. The first of the missions of the ABCFM were to Ceylon (Sri Lanka) and India, as well as to the Cherokee and Choctaw of the southeast US. In October 1816, the ABCFM established the Foreign Mission School in Cornwall, CT, for the instruction of native youth to become missionaries, physicians, surgeons, schoolmasters or interpreters. By 1817, a dozen students, six of them Hawaiians, were training at the Foreign Mission School to become missionaries to teach the Christian faith to people around the world. One of those was ʻŌpūkahaʻia, a young Hawaiian who came to the US in 1809, who was being groomed to be a key figure in a mission to Hawai‘i. ʻŌpūkahaʻia yearned “with great earnestness that he would (return to Hawaiʻi) and preach the Gospel to his poor countrymen.” Unfortunately, ʻŌpūkahaʻia died unexpectedly at Cornwall on February 17, 1818. The life and memoirs of ʻŌpūkahaʻia inspired other missionaries to volunteer to carry his message to the Hawaiian Islands. On October 23, 1819, the Pioneer Company of ABCFM missionaries from the northeast US, set sail on the Thaddeus for the Hawaiian Islands. They first sighted the Islands and arrived at Kawaihae on March 30, 1820, and finally anchored at Kailua-Kona, April 4, 1820.
    [Show full text]
  • Daughters of Hawaiʻi Calabash Cousins
    Annual Newsletter 2018 • Volume 41 Issue 1 Daughters of Hawaiʻi Calabash Cousins “...to perpetuate the memory and spirit of old Hawai‘i and of historic facts, and to preserve the nomenclature and correct pronunciation of the Hawaiian language.” The Daughters of Hawaiʻi request the pleasure of Daughters and Calabash Cousins to attend the Annual Meeting on Wednesday, February 21st from 10am until 1:30pm at the Outrigger Canoe Club 10:00 Registration 10:30-11:00 Social 11:00-12:00 Business Meeting 12:00-1:00 Luncheon Buffet 1:00-1:30 Closing Remarks Reservation upon receipt of payment Call (808) 595-6291 or [email protected] RSVP by Feb 16th Cost: $45 Attire: Whites No-Host Bar Eligibility to Vote To vote at the Annual Meeting, a Daughter must be current in her annual dues. The following are three methods for paying dues: 1) By credit card, call (808) 595-6291. 2) By personal check received at 2913 Pali Highway, Honolulu HI 96817-1417 by Feb 15. 3) By cash or check at the Annual Meeting registration (10-10:30am) on February 21. If unable to attend the Annual Meeting, a Daughter may vote via a proxy letter: 1) Identify who will vote on your behalf. If uncertain, you may choose Barbara Nobriga, who serves on the nominating committee and is not seeking office. 2) Designate how you would like your proxy to vote. 3) Sign your letter (typed signature will not be accepted). 4) Your signed letter must be received by February 16, 2017 via post to 2913 Pali Highway, Honolulu HI 96817-1417 or via email to [email protected].
    [Show full text]