DOCSLIB.ORG

Stay out of Syria - by Joshua Landis | Foreign Policy 6/7/12 6:35 PM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stay out of Syria - by Joshua Landis | Foreign Policy 6/7/12 6:35 PM Stay Out of Syria - By Joshua Landis | Foreign Policy 6/7/12 6:35 PM MAGAZINE ARCHIVE Search FP SEARCH FOLLOW LOGIN Stay Out of Syria Foreign intervention to topple Bashar al-Assad's bloody regime risks a fiasco on par with Iraq and Afghanistan. BY JOSHUA LANDIS | JUNE 5, 2012 Let's be clear: Washington is pursuing regime change by civil war in Syria. The United States, Europe, and the Gulf states want regime change, so they are starving the regime in Damascus and feeding the opposition. They have sanctioned Syria to a fare-thee-well and are busy shoveling money and helping arms supplied by the Gulf get to the rebels. This will change the balance of power in favor of the revolution. It is also the most the United States can and should do. President Barack Obama does not want to intervene directly in Syria for obvious reasons, and he is right to be cautious. The United States has failed at nation- building twice before in the Middle East. The Libyan example of limited intervention by using air power alone could suck the United States into a protracted and open-ended engagement. One cannot compare Libya to Syria. The former is a relatively small, homogeneous, and wealthy society. Syria has a population four times larger, which is poor and wracked by an increasingly violent civil war across religious lines. Moreover, the chance that the United States can end the killing in Syria by airpower alone is small. The argument that the United States could have avoided radicalization and civil war in Iraq by toppling Saddam Hussein in 1991 is unconvincing. Similar arguments are now being offered to talk Americans into jumping into Syria. Iraq was not a mature nation-state and was likely to fall apart. The fact that it imploded into civil war when the United States roto-rootered Saddam's regime should have been expected. U.S. intervention in Syria will likely lead to something similar: civil war and radicalization. Syrians have never agreed on basic questions of identity and policy, and it is unlikely that they will decide these issues peacefully today. With America's economy in the dumps, its military badly bruised, its reputation among Muslims in tatters, and its people fatigued by foreign wars, this is no time to intervene in Syria. Washington has no staying power if things go wrong. It wants regime-change on the cheap -- to bomb and withdraw. And if things go wrong, will we leave the Syrians in the lurch or get sucked into another complicated quagmire? The administration can ill afford to leave a failed state behind in Syria or to have it unfurl into civil war. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/06/05/stay_out_of_syria?page=full Page 1 of 11 Stay Out of Syria - By Joshua Landis | Foreign Policy 6/7/12 6:35 PM Even more pressing will be the need for post-conflict reconstruction. Syria is a nation the size of Iraq whose population has outstripped its water and economic resources. Unlike Iraq, it has insufficient sources of revenue to quickly rebuild its infrastructure. What if there is massive looting and chaos? Syria produces little the world wants to buy. It hardly produces enough electricity for three hours of power a day. The school system is in a shambles. Do Americans want to pay for putting Syria back together? More to the point, should they let Washington start what it would not finish? If anyone tells you they are going to build democracy in Syria, don't buy it. Democracy is unlikely to succeed there anytime soon. The two social indicators that predict the success of democratization with any accuracy are median population age and per capita gross domestic product. According to a recent study, autocracies with a median population age of over 30 years old are most likely to transition to liberal democracies -- Syria has a median age of 21. This is the same as Iraq's and just slightly older than Gaza's and Yemen's. Because of its poverty and youth, political scientists give it small chances of becoming democratic and stable any time soon. Beware of drinking the democratization Kool-Aid. Anyone who believes that Syria will avoid the excesses of Iraq -- where the military, government ministries, and Baath Party were dissolved and criminalized -- is dreaming. Syrian government institutions and the security forces will fall apart once the revolution prevails. They are overwhelmingly staffed by Baathists, Alawites, and other minorities, recruited for loyalty to President Bashar al-Assad -- no revolutionary government will keep them on. Their dismissal will provide fodder for a counterinsurgency, promoting greater chaos across the country. Syria's new rulers will also face a daunting set of challenges upon taking power. They will be obliged to employ the hundreds of thousands of jobless Syrians who have sacrificed for the revolution, lost family, and struggled in the face of tyranny. If the United States becomes militarily involved -- destroying the presidential palace in Damascus and military installations -- it will own Syria. Will it discipline the dozens of militias that have sprung up to represent the revolutionary forces? If the death toll rises after the Assad regime is taken out, will the United States continue to dedicate itself to stopping the killing? Syrian opposition figures have estimated that running the government for the first six months after the fall of Assad will cost $12 billion, and have made it clear that they will ask international donors for financial support. This is chicken feed. Anyone who knows anything about Syria knows that it will take a lot more than $12 billion to stabilize and rebuild the country. The United States currently spends $12 billion dollars every three months in Afghanistan. In 2010, the United States was spending $6.7 billion in Afghanistan every month, as well as $5.5 billion in Iraq. Few Americans believe this money was well spent. It is rash to expect Syria to cost less. If the United States has learned anything, it is that it cannot sort out issues of power-sharing and national identity for Middle Eastern countries. The road to national unity does not go through Washington. In the end, Syrians must find their own way and choose their own national leaders. Ahmad Chalabi and Hamid Karzai turned out to be bad choices for Iraq and Afghanistan, respectively. There is no indication that the United States could do a better job of picking winners in Syria. Burhan Ghalioun, the original leader of the Syrian National Council (SNC), seemed to have all the qualities of a future Syrian president, but his own party members attacked him for treason within months of confirming him as leader. He was forced to resign on May 17, setting the stage for a showdown between the powerful Muslim Brotherhood and its political rivals over who will be the SNC's new leader. Militias, the names of which we don't even know and with ideologies that could turn out to be closer to Osama bin Laden's than George Washington's, are competing on the ground for cash and Kalashnikovs. Syrians are divided because they have no tradition of unity and the Baathists have destroyed politics for a half-century. Nothing the United States can do will erase that legacy of political underdevelopment. It seems heartless to stand by and do so little as massacres, such as the atrocity carried out at Houla, continue. More than 13,000 Syrians have been killed in the last 14 months of revolution. But there is no reason to believe U.S. intervention can staunch the violence. American troops killed over 10,000 Iraqis in the first month of invasion in 2003. A further 100,000 Iraqis were killed by the time they left -- and even now, Iraq remains in turmoil and a new dictatorship seems to be taking shape. Car bombs are a regular occurrence in Baghdad, and the government cleaves to Iran rather than the United States. The cost in Iraq was high. The chances that the United States would end the killing by destroying Syria's Baathist regime is not good. In all likelihood, the Syrian revolution will be less bloody if Syrians carry it out for themselves. A new generation of national leaders will emerge from the struggle. They will not emerge with any legitimacy if America hands them Syria on a golden platter. How will they claim that they won the struggle for dignity, freedom, and democracy? America cannot give these things. Syrians must take them. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/06/05/stay_out_of_syria?page=full Page 2 of 11 Stay Out of Syria - By Joshua Landis | Foreign Policy 6/7/12 6:35 PM The United States can play a role with aid, arms, and intelligence -- but it cannot and should not try to decide Syria's future and determine the victors of this conflict. If Syrians want to own Syria in the future, they must take charge of their revolution and figure out how to win it. It is better for Syria, and it is better for America. Like 385 likes. Sign Up to see what your friends like. Save big when you subscribe to FP STR/AFP/GettyImages Joshua Landis is the director of the Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Oklahoma and author of "Syria Comment," a daily newsletter on Syrian politics. 35 comments Powered by Welcome to Foreign Policy's new commenting system! The good news is that it's now easier than ever to comment and share your insights with friends.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is Behind the Scud Scare? Posted by Joshua Landis Thursday, April 15, 2010 - 2:18 PM
    What is behind the Scud scare? Posted By Joshua Landis Thursday, April 15, 2010 - 2:18 PM Joshua Landis is the director of the Center for Middle East Studies and associate professor at the University of Oklahoma. He is the author of the blog Syria Comment. Reports in U.S. and Israeli papers on Wednesday, alleging that Syria delivered Scud missiles to Hezbollah, has set off a firestorm about the limits of engagement and the danger posed by Syria and nonstate actors in the region. Yet the ensuing debate has ignored the broader context of which this episode is but a symptom: namely, that the continued lack of resolution to the decades-long conflict between Syria and Israel has been allowed to fester. This new development could not have been better timed to throw a monkey wrench into Washington's engagement process with Syria and President Barack Obama's efforts to reanimate the stalled peace process in the region. Robert S. Ford, the first ambassador named to Damascus in five years, is in the midst of his confirmation process. A key committee in the Senate has recommended his confirmation, but the ultimate vote among the full Senate has yet to take place. There are many who would like to stop it, not the least because Obama seems ready to push forward efforts to resolve the long-festering Arab -Israeli conflict. On Tuesday, he declared that solving the dispute was a "vital national security interest of the United States" because it is "costing us significantly in terms of both blood and treasure." In the short term, the White House's desire to help broker a Middle East peace means getting an ambassador back to Damascus and engaging with Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion, Refugees, and Migration
    FOR MORE INFORMATION BUTLER UNIVERSITY SEMINAR on RELIGION and GLOBAL AFFAIRS presents WWW.BUTLER.EDU/CFV 317-940-8253 The Seminar on Religion and Global Affairs is a program of the Center for Faith and Vocation at Butler University, promoting understanding of interfaith and intercultural relations through the discussion of religious issues in global perspectives. We wish to thank our internal partners, including Global and Historical Studies for their Sponsored by the sponsorship as well as the Desmond Tutu Center for Peace, Reconciliation, and Global Justice CENTER for FAITH and VOCATION and the Philosophy, Religion, and Classics Department for the partnerships. We are also thankful to our community partners for their collaboration, including the Center for Interfaith Cooperation, the Immigrant Welcome Center, and Catholic Charities Indianapolis FOUR PUBLIC SEMINARS Refugee and Immigrant Services. For parking on Butler University’s campus, patrons September 19, October 17, should park in the Sunset Avenue Parking Garage. Fees can be found at butler.edu/parking. January 23, and February 27 PARTNERING EVENTS: INDY FESTIVAL of FAITHS— SACRED MIGRATIONS Sunday, October 15, 1:00-5:00 PM, Veteran’s Memorial Plaza For accessibility information or to request disability-related accommodations, please visit WELCOMING STRANGERS, FINDING www.butler.edu/event-accommodations. BROTHERS and SISTERS Each seminar meets from 7:00 to 9:00 PM Monday, February 19, 7:00 PM, at the Schrott Center for the Arts, Butler Arts Center. Eidson-Duckwall Recital Hall,
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Foreign Involvement Within the Syria Conflict. - Why Had the United States and Russia a Foreign Interest in Syria
    Bachelor thesis An analysis of foreign involvement within the Syria conflict. - Why had the United States and Russia a foreign interest in Syria. Author: Emelie Pettersson Supervisor: Anders Persson Examiner: Martin Nilsson Term: Ht19 Subject: Political Science Level: Bachelor Thesis Course code: 2SK31E 2 Abstract This study offers an alternative analysis of the current literature regarding foreign involvement in the Syria civil war. The initials briefly describe the current situation in Syria, international relations and why the conflict is interesting to analyse from a scientific standpoint. The relevant actors and theoretical construction are also introduced. In the previous research chapter, the current research is presented concerning the global superpowers as well as the interventions that have taken place in Syria. In the theory chapter realism and liberalism are presented, and a number of important factors are discussed. In the result, the decisions and events that have taken place during the conflict in Syria is analysed through the lens of previous named theories. The actors studied are the USA and Russia. There are both realistic and liberalist elements in the decisions made by the actors. The final part of the essay discusses the result. The underlying interest of the players largely determines which decision is ultimately taken. Moreover, there are underlying tones of realism even in clearly liberalistic decisions. Key words International Relations, International politics, IR Realism, IR Liberalism, foreign policy, foreign intervention, Syria civil war, Russia foreign policy, US foreign policy. 3 Table of Content 1. Introduction ............................................................................................ 6 1.1. Aim, problem statement and limitations. ............................................. 7 1.1.1. Limitations ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SMA Reach-Back 13 January 2017
    13 January 2017 SMA Reach-back 13 January 2017 Question (R3 QL7): How does Da'esh's transition to insurgency manifest itself in Syria; which other jihadist groups might offer the potential for merger and which areas of ungoverned space are most likely to offer conditions conducive for Da'esh to maintain some form of organizational structure and military effectiveness? Contributors: Dr. Joshua Landis (University of Oklahoma); Vern Liebl (Center for Advanced Operational Culture, USMC); Dr. Sabrina Pagano (NSI, Inc.); Mubin Shaikh (University of Liverpool) Executive Summary Dr. Sabrina Pagano, NSI Da’esh Transition in Syria The contributors varied in their discussions of what a Da’esh transition—or the future of Syria more broadly—would look like. Drawing on work by Gelvin, Pagano suggests that three scenarios are most likely for Da’esh’s transition in Syria. These include the complete destruction and disappearance of the group and its ideology; transition into an insurgent group capable of conducting limited operations in Syria and/or inspiring attacks abroad; or disintegration into a loose collection of former fighters and free agents conducting attacks, in some cases without organizational support. Finally, University of Oklahoma ME expert, Dr. Joshua Landis, indicated that while it is difficult to generalize, the extreme factionalization that characterized Syria prior to Da’esh’s involvement would likely come back into play. As such, we may expect a revived emphasis on the clan or tribe, with ongoing resistance to central government. Landis continued by suggesting that sufficient weakening of Da’esh will eventually enable the Syrian government led by Assad to regain broad control.
    [Show full text]
  • The Survival of Authoritarianism and the Syrian Identity Crisis: Explaining the Resilience of Assad’S Ruling Bargain
    University of Washington Tacoma UW Tacoma Digital Commons PPPA Paper Prize Politics, Philosophy and Public Affairs Spring 6-8-2016 The urS vival of Authoritarianism and the Syrian Identity Crisis: Explaining the Resilience of Assad's Ruling Bargain Joshua Vasquez [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/ppe_prize Part of the International Relations Commons, Islamic World and Near East History Commons, and the Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons Recommended Citation Vasquez, Joshua, "The urS vival of Authoritarianism and the Syrian Identity Crisis: Explaining the Resilience of Assad's Ruling Bargain" (2016). PPPA Paper Prize. 7. https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/ppe_prize/7 This Undergraduate Research Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Politics, Philosophy and Public Affairs at UW Tacoma Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in PPPA Paper Prize by an authorized administrator of UW Tacoma Digital Commons. The Survival of Authoritarianism and The Syrian Identity Crisis: Explaining the Resilience of Assad’s Ruling Bargain Joshua Vasquez TPOLS 480 Democratization and Political Development in the Middle East June 5, 2015 2 Introduction The Arab Spring was a regional social mobilization that unrevealed ruling-bargains in the Middle East, which have been resilient since the early 1950s. In Tunisia, Ben Ali was ousted in about three weeks and fled to Saudi Arabia. After two weeks of demonstrations in Egypt, Mubarak resign from the presidency because the police failed to quell the uprising and the military refused to come to his aid. Following his resignation, he was arrested by the military and is currently awaiting trial for killing demonstrators, embezzlement of state funds, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Home Office
    Country Policy and Information Note Syria: the Syrian Civil War Version 4.0 August 2020 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the Introduction section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment of, in general, whether one or more of the following applies: x A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm x The general humanitarian situation is so severe as to breach Article 15(b) of European Council Directive 2004/83/EC (the Qualification Directive) / Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iii) of the Immigration Rules x The security situation presents a real risk to a civilian’s life or person such that it would breach Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive as transposed in paragraph 339C and 339CA(iv) of the Immigration Rules x A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) x A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory x A claim is likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and x If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Sectarianism in the Middle East
    Sectarianism in the Middle East Implications for the United States Heather M. Robinson, Ben Connable, David E. Thaler, Ali G. Scotten C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1681 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9699-9 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Sunni and Shi’ite Muslims attend prayers during Eid al-Fitr as they mark the end of the fasting month of Ramadan, at the site of a suicide car bomb attack over the weekend at the shopping area of Karrada, in Baghdad, Iraq, July 6, 2016. REUTERS/Thaier Al-Sudani Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
    [Show full text]
  • Assad, Syria's
    Why Syria Matters The Moral Imperative of bringing down the house of Al-Assad By Nader Hashemi n March 15, 2011, the Arab Spring came to Syria. Like the other Arab revolts, it occurred spontaneously and proceeded nonviolently. The core political Ogrievances and aspirations were the same as elsewhere: karama (dignity), hurriya (freedom) and adala ijtima’iyya (social justice). The House of Al-Assad, in power forty-one years at the time and arguably the most repressive regime in the Arab world, faced a legitimacy crisis of unprecedented scale and proportion. What is interesting about this particular revolt is that at the time many experts predicted that the Arab Spring would stop at Syria’s borders. Ammar Abdulhamid, a Syrian dissident and former fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, argued that “Syria is not ready for an uprising” because the preparatory organizing at the grassroots that led to the uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt was absent in the Syrian case.1 Similarly, Joshua Landis of the University of Oklahoma suggested an “important factor is that [Al-Assad] is popular among young people.” He explained: “I’m always astounded how the average guy in the street, the taxi driver, the person you talk to in a restaurant or wherever, they don’t talk about democracy. They com- plain about corruption, they want justice and equality, but they’ll look at elections in Lebanon and laugh, saying, ‘who needs that kind of democracy?’”2 Unsurprisingly, Bashar Al-Assad, Syria’s president since 2000, held the same view. As the Arab Spring unfolded, he gave an interview to the Wall Street Jour- nal in which he rejected the idea that Syria was ripe for revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Syrian Studies Association Newsletter XIV: 1 (2008)
    News of Members Hania Abou al-Shamat, University of Southern California, received her PhD in Political Economy and Public Policy in 2008. Her dissertation is “The Religious Educational Divide in Nineteenth-Century Lebanon: Institutional Roots of Communal Educational Choices”. Dr. Abou al-Shamat was the Graduate Student Representative on the board of the Syrian Studies Association from 2006-2008. Zayde G. Antrim, Trinity College, USA, participated in the SSA-sponsored panel "Before Nationalism: Land and Loyalty in the Middle East" at MESA 2007 with a paper on the idea of "watan" in texts from Ayyubid and Mamluk Syria. In the spring of 2008, Prof. Antrim gave a paper called "'Abode of the Prophets'" on images of Syria in al-Muqaddasi's geography at a Princeton University colloquium called "Landscapes of the Saints: Hagiography and Land in the Near East and Europe, ca. 500-900." She delivered a paper in Istanbul as part of the International Symposium on Baghdad, Madinat al-Salam, held b between Nov. 7-9, 2008 and sponsored by Marmara University and the Organization of Islamic Conference. Prof. Antrim will appear in a documentary film called "Jerusalem: Center of the World," airing on PBS on April 29, 2009. Jere L. Bacharach, University of Washington, was awarded a Mellon Foundation Emeritus Fellowship for 2008-2009 to work on monetary developments in fifteenth-century Egypt and Syria. A second edition of his Islamic History through Coins: An Analysis and Catalogue of Tenth-century Ikhshidid Coinage just appeared with AUC Press. Nimat Hafez Barazangi, Cornell University, was invited by the Austrian Ministry for European and International Affairs to participate in a conference on Inter-religious and Inter-cultural Dialogue from Gender Perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Upgrading Authoritarianism in the Arab World
    THE BROOKINGS INSTIT U TION 1775 MASSACH U SETTS AVE ., NW WASHINGTON , D.C. 20036-2103 ANALYSIS PAPER www.brookings.edu Number 13, October 2007 UPGRADING AU THORITARIANISM IN THE ARAB WORLD STEVEN HEYDEMANN ANALYSIS PAPER Number 13, October 2007 UPGRADING AU THORITARIANISM IN THE ARAB WORLD STEVEN HEYDEMANN TABLE OF CONTENTS AC KNO W LEDGMENTS ......................................................................V EXE cu TIVE SU MMARY .................................................................... VII THE AU THOR ...........................................................................IX UPGRADING AU THORITARIANISM ..............................................................1 KEY FEAT U RES OF AU THORITARIAN UPGRADING ...................................................5 EMERGING PATTERNS IN ARAB GOVERNAN C E : THE NORMALIZATION OF ARAB AU THORITARIANISM .............................................27 CRA C KS IN THE WALL ? AU THORITARIAN UPGRADING AND U.S. DEMO C RA C Y PROMOTION ..................31 T HE SABAN CEN T ER A T THE BROOKING S IN st I T U T ION III AC KNO W LEDGMENTS wish to acknowledge, with thanks, the generous support of the Smith-Richardson Foundation for a larger project I of which this analysis paper is a part. Ariel Ahram provided invaluable research assistance in the preparation of this paper. The views presented here are solely those of the author. T HE SABAN CEN T ER A T THE BROOKING S IN st I T U T ION V EXE cu TIVE SU MMARY uthoritarianism in the Arab world is not what it promotion and to recognize, in particular, that Arab Aused to be. Indeed, it might well be stronger, more regimes are converging around policies that are explic- flexible, and more resilient than ever, despite the best itly designed to stabilize and preserve authoritarian efforts of the United States, its European Union part- rule in the context of ongoing demands for political ners, and Arab democrats to bring about sustained and change.
    [Show full text]
  • Landis Al Noor Spring 2016
    ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• A Great Sorting Out: Te Future of Minorities in the Middle East An Interview with Joshua Landis ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Al Noor Staf Joshua Landis is widely recognized as one of the English-speaking world’s foremost experts on Syria and the Levant. Raised in Saudi Arabia and Lebanon, he has also lived in Egypt, Turkey and Syria, and speaks Arabic and French fuently. Professor Landis is currently the head of the Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Oklahoma; he taught previously at Sarah Lawrence College, Wake Forest University, and Princeton University. He is a regular analyst on television and radio and is regularly quoted in publications such as the New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and Time Magazine. His expertise is regularly sought in Washington DC, where he advises government agencies and has spoken at thing tanks such as Brookings Institute, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Woodrow Wilson Institute. Since 2004, Professor Landis has published the blog Syria Comment, one of the primary online forums for news, commentary and analysis on Syria and its neighbors. ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    Syrian Studies Association Newsletter نشرة رابطة الدراسات السورية Volume XV No. 2 Spring-Summer 2010 Association News... 3 Features……………… 4 Research Notes….. 8 Arts in Syria ……. 21 Members of the Board President Fred Lawson Past President: Peter Sluglett Secretary-Treasurer Geoff Schad Member at Large Elyse Semerdjian Student Member Hilary This issue of our newsletter features articles on the study of Syria in Scotland and Scandinavia and among Scots and Scandinavians. Kalmbach Syria Liaison Beverly From the President Levine June 6, 2010 Prize Committee Peter Dear SSA Members Sluglett and Andrea Stanton Eyjafjallajokull dealt a body-blow to Syrian studies in April. The Webmaster Joshua Landis eruption of the now famous but still unpronounceable Icelandic volcano Newsletter Steve Tamari prevented scholars and journalists from all over the world from gathering Book Reviews Andrea at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at Lund University for a major conference on "Bashar al-Asad's First Decade." The meeting has been Stanton rescheduled for early October, and will consist of nine panels, an exhibit of photographs exploring "the secret life of Syrian lingerie" (which I Support the work of the assume builds on a pictorial report that was published on the BBC Syrian Studies website last December), an oud recital featuring Aleppo's Muhammad Association! See inside Qadri Dalal and a performance of folk dancing. for details on how to join, I recognize among the participants several SSA members--including how to contribute articles Paulo Pinto, Thomas Pierret, Cecile Boex, Radwan Ziadeh, Eyal Zisser, and reviews, and how to Samer Abboud, Jonathan Shannon, Ray Hinnebusch, Miriam Ababsa and keep up with our news Joshua Landis.
    [Show full text]