Highlights in the History of Forest Conservation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Highlights in the History of Forest Conservation Highlights in the Historyof rF Forest Conservation ,w "fu=B q_@a@ h- '"b& ry @ffiw 'e);Wie^,){k5&-? W.*"s W. wt ffi*tl ,r U.S. Dqrartnent of AEicultr.re Forest Service AIB-83 Highlights in the History of Forest Conservation US. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Revised March 1976 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $1.55 Stock Number 001-000-03457-0 25% discount allowed on orders of 100 or more to one address CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 In colonial days, 1607-1782 7 The young republic, 1783-1875 9 Federal forest work begins, 1876-1897 13 The conservation movement grows, 1898-1917 17 A period of rapid progress, 1918-1941 23 World War II period, 1941-1945 29 After World War II, 1945-1967 33 Awakening of environmental awareness, 1 968-1 975 41 Conclusion 47 National Forests 47 Early U.S. forestry leaders and Chiefs of the Forest Service 52 iii INTRODUCTION Forestry in the United States was still in a “misty inexhaustible resource. Land had to be cleared of dawn” at the beginning of the current century. How- trees to make it suitable for ( 1 ) agricultural pur- ever, it was inevitable from the beginning that forest poses, (2) roads, and (3) settlements. To pioneers conservation should play a major role in the develop- the forest seemed an obstacle to progress and safety. ment of this country. Here was a land singularly Wood was an essential ingredient to pioneer liveli- rich in natural resources, of which our forests were hood, but it was overabundant and free for the taking. dominant. Trees grew in all parts of this land except Also, the forests added to the dangers, for they har- in grasslands, the desert regions of the Great Plains, bored Indians and wild animals. and the arid basins of the West. The original timber- Still, there were those settlers in America who, land was estimated at 950 million acres. Forests ex- coming from lands where forests had been depleted, tended almost unbroken from the Atlantic Coast to brought with them the conviction that the forest was the Great Plains, and began again to the west where a valuable resource and should not be wasted. Re- they ranged in increasing numbers to climax in the strictions on cutting and burning forest land appeared giants of the Pacific Coast. early in the Colonies. These laws were aimed mostly It is generally accepted today that there still re- at protecting the property of others and reserving mains about two-thirds of the original forest lands. large white pines as masts for the British Royal Navy. This, despite the fact that as early as 1865 a timber Soon after the Colonies gained their independence, famine was predicted within 30 years. Differences special reserves of live oak trees were set aside along of opinion and conflict have marked the course of the southern coasts to provide timbers for naval conservation throughout our Nation’s history. vessels. The majority of the people, particularly during the So, there appeared two sides to the conservation country’s formative years, regarded the forests as an coin early in our history. These will appear and re- Figure 1. —Mt. Shuksan, Wash. F-385266 appear as we focus on the several distinct periods of time to time to arouse realization of the dangers that development of forest conservation in America. lay ahead if wasteful destruction of forests were not Sometimes these will appear as merely differences of checked, but they were as voices crying in the wilder- opinion, while at other times they present themselves ness. To most people it seemed the forests would last as confrontations and even conflict. forever. In colonial days, naturally being highlighted first The next highlight covers a period to be character- in our chronology, two important facts stand out: the ized by one word—exploitation. The restrictions im- settlers were energetic, intelligent, independent, and posed by a foreign sovereignty were thrown off. Al- ambitious people and gradually came to need the though the British trade restrictions had been much help of the mother country less and less; and, to the lighter than those imposed by other countries on their west was a great land with very few inhabitants. colonies, the Americans had become such strong in- America was largely a wilderness, with an abundance dividualists that they resented any controls. Now of fertile soil, most of the minerals required by mod- the pendulum swung the other way—expansion which ern industry, vast forests, and water for crops, power, knew no bounds was the order of the day. and other uses. These resources greatly influenced A census of 1790 showed that about 4 million per- the development of the country and the lives of its sons lived in the United States. Most of them lived people, and helped make the country rich. Sheer along the Atlantic seacoast, either in villages or on abundance, however, often led early Americans into farms. Only about 100,000 hardy settlers had ven- wasteful habits, such as farming fields continuously tured west of the Allegheny Mountains. But the coun- until the land began to wear out, needlessly destroy- try grew rapidly. People thought little of hardships ing wide forest areas by poor logging methods, and so long as they could get ahead in the world. Prosper- recklessly slaughtering wildlife, such as the buffalo. ity grew mainly because land cost so little, and the A few farsighted and public-spirited people tried from forests seemed to be everywhere. This resulted in as many trees being burned to clear the land as were The Civil War and the Reconstruction put addi- used for building, furniture, utensils, tools, railroad tional drains on the Nation’s timber supplies. It was ties, or firewood. The 19th century saw lumbering about this time that a conservation conscience began develop and spread on a colossal scale until nearly to awaken among the citizenry. The rapid pace of all the original forests were cut over, from the Atlantic lumbering, then in the Lake States, the widespread Ocean to the Great Plains. This cutting was often fol- destruction by forest fires, the growing realization of lowed by severe fires, which frequently prevented the the relationship of forests to streamflow and water forests from renewing themselves. supplies— all caused people to think about future tim- Jefferson’s promotion of agriculture and the Louisi- ber supplies and the importance of forest cover. ana Purchase were most important in this period of Scientists and other professional people took the national growth. The United States had grown amaz- lead in organizing the forest conservation movement. ingly in the years after Jefferson took office. Settle- Demands began to be made that the Federal Govern- ment had reached as far west as the Missouri River, ment reserve large holdings of public domain land in and the population had passed 17 million. the West before the forests there too were recklessly Exploitation of the forests was gradual at first, be- exploited. The movement had to overcome strong fore the days of power equipment, but the forests of resistance from a population and legislators deeply New England had been mostly cut over by 1830, dedicated to “rugged individualism” and the right to those of New York State by 1850, and Pennsylva- do with land as they pleased. Much timberland was nia’s forests shortly after the Civil War. acquired by fraud and there was widespread harvest- Figure 2.—View of mountains in Gallatin National Forest, Mont. 3 Figure 3.—Sheep grazing in Midway Valley. Dixie National Forest, Utah. F-508830 ing of timber on public lands without authorization gressed in three distinct waves and extends to the throughout the Midwest. present. Several States started action to conserve forests Portentous of things soon to come, Congress, in in the 1860’s and 1870’s—first with special boards 1891, authorized Federal forest reserves in the public to study the forest situation, then with attempts to domain, and the first reserves were created by Presi- encourage tree planting bounties, neither of which dent Benjamin Harrison. In 1897, Congress provided was very successful. for organizing and managing the reserves and open- The first survey of forest resources was included ing them up for public use. in the 1870 U.S. census. Lectures and courses in for- By 1900, the United States had become one of the estry began to be offered at several colleges and uni- greatest economic powers in the world. Its population versities. The American Forestry Association was stood at more than 75 million. With all this growth, organized in 1 875 to develop public support for forest however, came the slow realization that the Nation’s conservation— especially reforestation. strength was based on its natural resources. In 1876 Congress appointed a special agent to The Federal forest reserves remained under con- gather information on the forest situation and on how trol of the Department of the Interior’s General Land forests could be managed. In 1881 this office was Office until 1 905 when they were transferred to the made a division of Forestry in the Department of Department of Agriculture’s Bureau of Forestry, Agriculture, and in 1886 a professional forester be- which was renamed Forest Service. Its Chief was Gif- came head of the Division. In 1885, New York State ford Pinchot, America’s first professional forester, became the first State to set up a State forest. who had become head of the Forestry Division in the With this gradual awakening toward the end of the Department of Agriculture in 1898.
Recommended publications
  • UMNP Mountains Manual 2017
    Mountain Adventures Manual utahmasternaturalist.org June 2017 UMN/Manual/2017-03pr Welcome to Utah Master Naturalist! Utah Master Naturalist was developed to help you initiate or continue your own personal journey to increase your understanding of, and appreciation for, Utah’s amazing natural world. We will explore and learn aBout the major ecosystems of Utah, the plant and animal communities that depend upon those systems, and our role in shaping our past, in determining our future, and as stewards of the land. Utah Master Naturalist is a certification program developed By Utah State University Extension with the partnership of more than 25 other organizations in Utah. The mission of Utah Master Naturalist is to develop well-informed volunteers and professionals who provide education, outreach, and service promoting stewardship of natural resources within their communities. Our goal, then, is to assist you in assisting others to develop a greater appreciation and respect for Utah’s Beautiful natural world. “When we see the land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect.” - Aldo Leopold Participating in a Utah Master Naturalist course provides each of us opportunities to learn not only from the instructors and guest speaKers, But also from each other. We each arrive at a Utah Master Naturalist course with our own rich collection of knowledge and experiences, and we have a unique opportunity to share that Knowledge with each other. This helps us learn and grow not just as individuals, but together as a group with the understanding that there is always more to learn, and more to share.
    [Show full text]
  • FORESTRY SECTOR POLICY GOAL, OBJECTIVES and STRATEGIES
    National Forest Policy, Timor-Leste, December 2005 SUPPORT for the FORMULATION of a NATIONAL FOREST POLICY STATEMENT – TIMOR LESTE FORESTRY SECTOR POLICY GOAL, OBJECTIVES and STRATEGIES Introduction The National Development Plan (2002) assigns the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (MAFF) as the Government agency having prime responsibility for forestry development. New law defined the Ministry’s mandate and structure in 2002. The National Directorate of Coffee and Forestry (NDCF) is one of three national directorates within the ministry and has broad responsibilities for community forestry, watershed management, forest protection, plantation forestry, protected natural areas development and other aspects of forestry development. The National Development Plan emphasises a sustainable approach to the development and management of the forest resources of the country. It recognizes that forests are important for their biological diversity and that forest conservation is a priority task in forest development planning. National development strategies recognise the limited ability of NDCF to support field programmes and it asserts that they will mainly focus on improving that capability and assist in providing the basic steps that will enable the NDCF to work towards achieving the national objective of sustainable forest management. The strategies also attempt to make a contribution to other relevant Government short-term objectives, such as rural poverty alleviation. The NDCF will make a major contribution towards combating deforestation and forest degradation by initiating, in close cooperation with other sections of MAFF, a series of integrated programmes that will closely involve rural communities. Emphasis will be placed on reducing the adverse effects of shifting cultivation and other pressures on forests and encouraging the participation of communities to protect forests and watersheds.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Management Planning
    Forest Management Planning Basic knowledge Welcome to the Forest Management Planning Module. This module is intended for forest owners and managers wishing to plan SFM activities and to enable monitoring and control. The module provides information and links to tools and case studies, to guide users in planning the implementation of SFM at the forest management unit level. Forest management is the process of planning and implementing practices for the stewardship and use of forests and other wooded land targeted at specific environmental, economic, social and cultural objectives. Forest management planning is a fundamental component of SFM, and it may be required at various scales, from local to national; this module focuses on the local (or forest management unit) scale. The role of forest management planning is to determine and express the objectives of forest management in a specified area of forest and to set out the steps to be taken to achieve those objectives. Forest management planning is important for many reasons. For example, it can: help forest owners and managers identify what they want from the forest and provide an efficient course of action to meet those objectives; provide a means by which stakeholders can participate in forest management and ensure clarity on the roles and responsibilities of the various stakeholders; ensure the existence and functionality of the resource while also increasing its value (e.g. specifying where, how and under what conditions and constraints the resource may be used); save time and reduce costs (e.g. in road construction and wood harvesting); reduce risks and their impacts and avoid potentially costly forest management mistakes (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth World Forestry Congress
    Proceedings of the Fifth World Forestry Congress VOLUME 1 RE University of Washington, Seattle, Washington United States of America August 29September 10, 1960 The President of the United States of America DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER Patron Fifth World Forestry Congress III Contents VOLUME 1 Page Chapter1.Summary and Recommendations of the Congress 1 Chapter 2.Planning for the Congress 8 Chapter3.Local Arrangements for the Congress 11 Chapter 4.The Congress and its Program 15 Chapter 5.Opening Ceremonies 19 Chapter6. Plenary Sessions 27 Chapter 7.Special Congress Events 35 Chapitre 1.Sommaire et recommandations du Congrès 40 Chapitre 2.Preparation des plans en vue du Congrès 48 Chapitre 3.Arrangements locaux en vue du Congrès 50 Chapitre 4.Le Congrès et son programme 51 Chapitre 5.Cérémonies d'ouverture 52 Chapitre 6.Seances plénières 59 Chapitre 7.Activités spéciales du Congrès 67 CapItullo1. Sumario y Recomendaciones del Congreso 70 CapItulo 2.Planes para el Congreso 78 CapItulo 3.Actividades Locales del Congreso 80 CapItulo 4.El Congreso y su Programa 81 CapItulo 5.Ceremonia de Apertura 81 CapItulo 6.Sesiones Plenarias 88 CapItulo 7.Actos Especiales del Congreso 96 Chapter8. Congress Tours 99 Chapter9.Appendices 118 Appendix A.Committee Memberships 118 Appendix B.Rules of Procedure 124 Appendix C.Congress Secretariat 127 Appendix D.Machinery Exhibitors Directory 128 Appendix E.List of Financial Contributors 130 Appendix F.List of Participants 131 First General Session 141 Multiple Use of Forest Lands Utilisation multiple des superficies boisées Aprovechamiento Multiple de Terrenos Forestales Second General Session 171 Multiple Use of Forest Lands Utilisation multiple des superficies boisées Aprovechamiento Multiple de Terrenos Forestales Iv Contents Page Third General Session 189 Progress in World Forestry Progrés accomplis dans le monde en sylviculture Adelantos en la Silvicultura Mundial Section I.Silviculture and Management 241 Sessions A and B.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the Flood Control Act of 1944 on Indian Tribes Along the Missouri River
    S. HRG. 110–268 IMPACT OF THE FLOOD CONTROL ACT OF 1944 ON INDIAN TRIBES ALONG THE MISSOURI RIVER HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 1, 2007 Printed for the use of the Committee on Indian Affairs ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 39–935 PDF WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 09:27 Mar 10, 2008 Jkt 039935 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\DOCS\39935.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota, Chairman LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska, Vice Chairman DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona KENT CONRAD, North Dakota TOM COBURN, M.D., Oklahoma DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico MARIA CANTWELL, Washington GORDON H. SMITH, Oregon CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri RICHARD BURR, North Carolina JON TESTER, Montana SARA G. GARLAND, Majority Staff Director DAVID A. MULLON, JR., Minority Staff Director (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 09:27 Mar 10, 2008 Jkt 039935 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\DOCS\39935.TXT JACK PsN: JACKF C O N T E N T S Page Hearing held on November 1, 2007 ........................................................................ 1 Statement of Senator Conrad ................................................................................. 25 Statement of Senator Dorgan ................................................................................. 1 Prepared statement of Senator Johnson ................................................................ 3 Statement of Senator Murkowski ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
    NO. 07-13829-HH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES, INC., FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/Appellees/Cross-Appellants, FISHERMEN AGAINST THE DESTRUCTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee, MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, Intervenor-Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, Defendant/Counter-Claimant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee, CAROL WEHLE, as Executive Director of South Florida Water Management District, Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. SUGAR CORPORATION, Intervenor-Defendants/Appellants/Cross-Appellees _________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Case No. 02-80309-CV-CMA __________________________________________________________ BRIEF OF APPELLANT, CAROL WEHLE AS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT __________________________________________________________________ Respectfully Submitted, James E. Nutt South Florida Water Management District 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 682-6253 (561) 682-6276 (fax) [email protected] Fl. Bar No. 874868 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Friends of the Everglades, Inc., et al v. South Florida Water Management District, et al Case No. 07-13829-HH CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Appellant, Carol Wehle as Executive Director of South Florida Water Management District, a governmental entity, hereby files the following complete list of persons and entities who have an interest in the outcome of this case, pursuant to Eleventh Circuit Rules 26.1 and 26.1-3, as amended Abbott, Greg Albrecht, Virginia S. Altonaga, Honorable Cecilia, District Court Judge American Farm Bureau Federation American Rivers American Water Works Association Amron, Susan E.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC LAW 106-60—SEPT. 29, 1999 113 STAT. 483 Public Law
    PUBLIC LAW 106-60—SEPT. 29, 1999 113 STAT. 483 Public Law 106-60 106th Congress An Act Making appropriations for energy and water development for the fiscal year ending Sept. 29, 1999 September 30, 2000, and for other purposes. [H.E,. 2605] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Energy and following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury Water not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal year ending September Appropr^tions 30, 2000, for energy and water development, and for other purposes. Act, 2000. namely: TITLE I DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE—CIVIL DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS—CIVIL The following appropriations shall be expended under the direc­ tion of the Secretary of the Army and the supervision of the Chief of Engineers for authorized civil functions of the Department of the Army pertaining to rivers and harbors, flood control, beach erosion, and related purposes. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS For expenses necessary for the collection and study of basic information pertaining to river and harbor, flood control, shore protection, and related projects, restudy of authorized projects, mis­ cellaneous investigations, and, when authorized by laws, surveys and detailed studies and plans and specifications of projects prior to construction, $161,994,000, to remain available until expended: Provided, That the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is directed to use the remaining unobligated funds appropriated in Public Law 102-377 for the Red River Waterway, Shreveport, Louisiana, to Daingerfield, Texas, project for the feasi­ bility phase of the Red River Navigation, Southwest Arkansas, study.
    [Show full text]
  • UTILITY and SERVICE COMBINED with BEAUTY a Contextual and Architectural History of USDA Forest Service Region 6: 1905-1960
    UTILITY AND SERVICE COMBINED WITH BEAUTY A Contextual and Architectural History of USDA Forest Service Region 6: 1905-1960 Prepared for: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region (Region 6, Oregon and Washington) April 2005 UTILITY AND SERVICE COMBINED WITH BEAUTY A Contextual and Architectural History of USDA Forest Service Region 6: 1905-1960 Prepared by Team Members: Kay Atwood, Local Historian Sally Donovan, Architectural Historian Dennis Gray, Archeologist Ward Tonsfeldt, Industrial Historian for: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region (Oregon and Washington) Contract #56-046W-4-0550 Ward Tonsfeldt Consulting Bend, Oregon April 2005 Table of Contents USDA Forest Service Region 6 Table of Contents List of Figures V List of Tables Viii Acknowledgements ix CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION: THE PROJECT 1 Purpose and Scope 1 Research Methodology 2 Administrative Boundaries 2 Temporal Boundaries 3 Organization 3 CHAPTER 2: HISTORIC CONTEXT 4 THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGION 6 NINETEENTH CENTURY CONTEXT: 178 1-1891 4 Forest in the Euro-American Tradition 4 Public Land Policy 5 Forestry and Conservation in the 1 870s 5 Region 6 and the Pacific Northwest 6 FOREST RESERVE PERIOD: 1891-1904 7 Victory for the Conservation Movement 7 Forest Reserves in the Pacific Northwest 8 Management Philosophy 9 Grazing on the Reserves 9 Timber Management 10 Rangers on the Reserves 11 The Oregon Land Frauds 11 EARLY FOREST SERVICE: 1905-1911 12 Impact of the Transfer Act 12 Personnel Policy 13 Organization 14 Meeting
    [Show full text]
  • Norbeck Wildlife Preserve Landscape Assessment
    Norbeck Wildlife Preserve Landscape Assessment Black Hills National Forest Completed by: Continuing Education in Ecosystem Management Group Module XII June 12 – June 23, 2006 Acknowledgements This assessment would not have been possible without the assistance and patience of numerous individuals. We hope we spelled your name correctly and we are extremely grateful for all your help and assistance. Shelly Deisch – Ecologist, SD Game, Fish and Parks Gerard Baker - Superintendent, Mt. Rushmore National Memorial Bill Hill – Forester, Custer State Park Joe McFarland - Custer County, County Commissioner Ken Davis - Pennington County, County Commissioner Jim Brickley - Mayor Hill City Gary Brundige - Wildlife Biologist, Custer State Park Craig Pugsley - Recreation, Custer State Park Greg Josten – SD State Forestry Coe Foss – SD State Forestry Mike Pflaun, Chief Ranger Mt. Rushmore National Memorial Dan Licht, Reg. WL Biologist, Custer State Park Al Johnson – Owner, Palmer Gulch KOA Dave Ressler - Custer Chamber of Commerce Jim Sellars - Keystone Chamber of Commerce Mike Verchio - Hill City Chamber of Commerce Bob Demerssenan - Rapid City Chamber of Commerce John Forney - SD Tourism Committee Aaron Everett - Black Hills Forest Resource Association Justin Cutler - Recreational Adventures Co. Mike Jacobs – Black Hills Aerial Adventures Mike Dennyson - Developer Brian Brademeyer - Defenders of the Black Hills Sam Clawson - Sierra Club Jeremy Nichols - Biodiversity Conservation Alliance Colin Paterson - The Norbeck Society Nancy Hilding - Audubon
    [Show full text]
  • Jewel Cave National Monument Historic Resource Study
    PLACE OF PASSAGES: JEWEL CAVE NATIONAL MONUMENT HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY 2006 by Gail Evans-Hatch and Michael Evans-Hatch Evans-Hatch & Associates Published by Midwestern Region National Park Service Omaha, Nebraska _________________________________ i _________________________________ ii _________________________________ iii _________________________________ iv Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter 1: First Residents 7 Introduction Paleo-Indian Archaic Protohistoric Europeans Rock Art Lakota Lakota Spiritual Connection to the Black Hills Chapter 2: Exploration and Gold Discovery 33 Introduction The First Europeans United States Exploration The Lure of Gold Gold Attracts Euro-Americans to Sioux Land Creation of the Great Sioux Reservation Pressure Mounts for Euro-American Entry Economic Depression Heightens Clamor for Gold Custer’s 1874 Expedition Gordon Party & Gold-Seekers Arrive in Black Hills Chapter 3: Euro-Americans Come To Stay: Indians Dispossessed 59 Introduction Prospector Felix Michaud Arrives in the Black Hills Birth of Custer and Other Mining Camps Negotiating a New Treaty with the Sioux Gold Rush Bust Social and Cultural Landscape of Custer City and County Geographic Patterns of Early Mining Settlements Roads into the Black Hills Chapter 4: Establishing Roots: Harvesting Resources 93 Introduction Milling Lumber for Homes, Mines, and Farms Farming Railroads Arrive in the Black Hills Fluctuating Cycles in Agriculture Ranching Rancher Felix Michaud Harvesting Timber Fires in the Forest Landscapes of Diversifying Uses _________________________________ v Chapter 5: Jewel Cave: Discovery and Development 117 Introduction Conservation Policies Reach the Black Hills Jewel Cave Discovered Jewel Cave Development The Legal Environment Developing Jewel Cave to Attract Visitors The Wind Cave Example Michauds’ Continued Struggle Chapter 6: Jewel Cave Under the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pioneers-Establishing the Concept of Forestry in the Southwest, 1905-24
    Chapter 6 - The Pioneers-Establishing the Concept of Forestry in the Southwest, 1905-24 Ranching, lumbering, and mining were well established in the Southwest long before the earliest foresters or conservationists made their appearance. Ranchers grazed their cattle and sheep, loggers cut timber and chopped firewood, and prospectors explored for gold, silver, and copper on the public domain, almost as a right with no one disputing their course. The General Land Office of the Department of the Interior, which had jurisdiction over the Federal lands, was primarily interested in selling them. Anyone could buy land, usually at the minimum price of $1.25 per acre, either in large or small quantities. Homestead laws were generous, and settlers could claim 160 acres for each adult member of their family. Various special laws, such as the Timber Culture Act, and even more subterfuges enabled businessmen and corporations to acquire large blocks of land without paying even at the minimum price. Ranchers, accustomed to free use of the range, preferred to retain open access to the resources of the public domain-grass, water, timber, and minerals. They protested bitterly when Federal regulations curbed their frontier attitude. In like manner, ranchers, loggers, and others also invaded the railroad lands, taking what they wished and giving no thought to the long-range future of the region. The railroads, particularly the Santa Fe and the Southern Pacific, had few men to patrol their lands and found local opinion solidly against them when and if they attempted to prosecute trespassers for misappropriating property. This state of affairs was normal in the territories of Arizona and New Mexico for the last 50 years of the 19th century, from American annexation in 1848 to 1900.
    [Show full text]