DOCSLIB.ORG

Camassia Populations (Agavoideae, Asparagaceae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Linking floral anthesis, pollination, and species boundaries in Camassia populations (Agavoideae, Asparagaceae) Willamette University, Salem, OR Susan Kephart and Sebastian Mortimer Pollination & Species Boundaries: What we know... • Spatio-temporal variation influences plant-pollinator interactions, affecting species divergence and diversity (Burkle & Alarcón 2011) • Pollinator-mediated isolation is clearly evident when floral cues differ greatly (e.g., Mimulus, Penstemon) but less often explored in flowers accessible to generalist pollinators (Kephart & Theiss 2004; Kimball 2008) • Plant-pollinator interactions, abiotic, & historical factors can shape both floral traits and phenological timing, e.g., via selection against hybrids and/or competition for pollinator services (Stone et al. 1996). Rationale: Why Camassia? 1) Floral Traits & Speciation • Variable floral display & duration • Dynamic species boundaries w. hybrid zones (Uyeda & Kephart 2006) 2) Ecology-Conservation Roles • Diverse pollinators; Key nectar resource (Parachnowitsch & Elle 2005; Sultany et. al 2007) • Tractable data for climate change, B. Moissett pollinator decline • Habitat loss: oak savanna & wetland meadows (Wilson 1998) J. Reveal Visitors: Diverse Species & Functional Groups Hymenopteran & dipteran dominated system Social bees Flies S. Pollock A. Kotaich H. Wisch J. Ascher B.Ezray Bombus sp Xylocopa sp Apis mellifera Syrphidae Bombylidae Solitary bees D. Ditchburn K. Hillig M. Jacobson S.Cain H.Wisch Andrendidae Halictidae Megachilidae BUT ... Is that all? Visitors: Diverse Species & Functional Groups But..... S. Pollock Geography Disparity: 6 sp., 15 putative taxa Western region: putative origin & plexus of diversity (Gould 1942) NW Study Sites: Camassia Key Q’s: Geography & Pollination • Q1: Do pollinator faunas on camas differ by geography or species? • Q2: Do generalist pollinators vary in visitor abundance & effectiveness on sympatric Camassia? • Q3: How does floral anthesis differ in diurnal vs vespertine populations? • Q4: What are the implications for species conservation & future study? Pollinator Faunas: Geography vs Species Q1: Do pollinator faunas on camas differ by geography or species? Predict: functional group similarity more evident by species vs geography Test: Allopatric populations: Within vs between species comparisons Capture data: CAQU breviflora Sagehen Meadow Photo credit: S.Datwyler Within species: Allopatric populations, OR &CA C. quamash breviflora C. quamash breviflora Oregon California P > 0.25, df = 4, X2 = 1.5 No differences in pollinator composition in different geographic regions Briana Ezray WU Common geography: Allopatric Species, CA P < 0.05, df = 4, X2 = 10.22 Major visitors varied signficantly by camas species in same geographic region Common geography: Allopatric subspecies C. quamash breviflora C. quamash maxima E. Oregon W. Oregon P > 0.15, df = 4, X2 = 6.6 No significant differences in capture frequency Sympatric Pops: Insect Visitation, Effectiveness Q2: Do generalist pollinators vary in abundance & effectiveness on co- occurring Camassia? i.e., Is pollinator-mediated reproductive isolation unlikely? Tests: Sympatric Pops: In situ observations & manipulative expts Key parameters: Related species specific traits, i.e. varied floral displays, nectar levels, anthesis Camassia Species : Floral Displays & Traits Great camas Common camas C. quamash C. leichtlinii Focal sympatric population: Kingston Prairie, OR Phenology in Sympatric Populations CALE * CAQU * Kingston Prairie Near Meadow KP, Oregon A. Dennis, M. Sultany & multiple WU students across years: 2007-2015 Pollinators on Camassia: Methods • Pollinator Surveys (Dafni et al. 2005: Kearns & Inouye 1993) – Pollinator = alighted on flower w contact and actively foraging – Conducted over 3-4 wk flowering period – Reference collections to ID insect taxa • Belt Transects – Unispecific (2m x 60m/species) – Mixed (2m x 50m, co-flowering species) • Pollinator Observations & Expts (Dafni et al. 2005: Kearns & Inouye 1993) – 1 x 1 m plots – Varied floral density, species, time of day, season – Cut inflorescences to manipulate density – Caging experiment: checked deposition on pollen-free stigmas Temporal Variation in Pollinator Abundance Pollinator Abundance Transects: Composition of Pollinator Community 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% Other Diptera Bombyliidae 50% Other Hymenoptera Mean % Mean Bombus sp. 40% Apis mellifera Halictidae 30% 20% 10% 0% 5/16 5/17 5/20 5/20 5/28 5/31 5/31 6/3 6/13 6/13 6/14 6/14 6/17 6/17 CAQU CAQU CALE CAQU CALE CALE CAQU CALE CALE CAQU CALE CAQU CALE CAQU Adan Kotaich WU Part I: Pollinator Behavior & Effectiveness Bombylius major contacts Apis mellifera contacts anther Bombus worker gathers nectar Bombylius major contacts Halictid bee on petal after a Apis mellifera contacts anther Bombus worker gathers nectar anthers while drinking nectar. Halictid bee on petal after a as it probes for nectar. at ovary base; side approach anthers while drinking nectar. foraging bout on Camassia. as it probes for nectar. at ovary base; side approach foraging bout on Camassia. Pollinator Behavior & Effectiveness Insect Pollinator Visitation to Camas Stalks per Plot 8 C. quamash C. leichtlinii 7 t o l P / 6 d e t i s i 5 V s k l a t 4 S s a m 3 a C n a e 2 M 1 0 Apis Bombus Solitary Bees Other Diptera Hymenoptera Insect taxa Habitat & Species: Natural Meadow Visitation 0.5 CAQU 0.45 CALE 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 www.ubcbotanicalgarden.org 0.15 0.1 0.05 Mean # Visits Natural Camas/10 min Natural Mean # Visits 0 Near Meadow Far Meadow Habitat 2 - Insect visitation higher on CALE than CAQU (X =117.06, P <0.05) www.markshepart.net - Visitation greatest in near meadow (X2= 132.76, P <0.05) Do Abundances Vary With Admixture? Unispecific vs Interspecific Transects Camassia Pollination: What are we missing? C. quamash C. leichtlinii C. cusickii C. howellii Camassia howellii: Unusual Pollination Interesting Vespertine Pollination in Camassia... Camassia howellii: Unusual Pollination Interesting Vespertine Pollination in Camassia... Key Q’s: Anthesis Pollination mode • Q3: How does floral anthesis differ in diurnal vs vespertine populations? What are the implications for species divergence & future study? NW Study Sites: Camassia C. quamash ssp maxima Western Camassia Species C. quamash C. leichtlinii C. cusickii C. howellii Floral Anthesis: Why be Vespertine? Diurnal? • For Plants? • For Pollinators? Which mode came first? By what mechanism did pollination shift occur? Is it only present in C. howellii, and in all populations of this species? Willamette Valley: SW Oregon: C. quamash C. howellii 40 Total New Open Flowers Total New Open Flowers 35 14 30 12 25 10 20 8 15 6 10 4 5 2 0 0 DIURNAL VESPERTINE How are these patterns similar? Different? Anthesis: When do flowers open & present pollen? 3.5 3.0 C. quamash 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 5.0 4.5 C. howellii Ave # Stems PP 4.0 3.5 Ave # Open Flowers 3.0 Ave # New Open 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0601-0900 0901-1200 1201-1500 1500-1800 1801-2100 2101-2400 Coast Range: Mt Hebo C. quamash 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% Out of Total Buds Out of Total 20% Percent New Open FLowers New Open FLowers Percent 10% 0% www.centralcoastjournal.com//hebo Morning Afternoon Evening Opening of New flowers DIURNAL What did we learn? • Pollinators discriminate among accessible Camassia flowers w different species-level traits, but intermixed sympatric populations have similar faunas. • Generalist pollinator abundances & visitation rates differed with Camassia species, habitat, season, and floral traits. Solitary & social bees prevalent, but Bombus deposits more pollen/stigma & visits more plants in larger C. leichtlinii • Pattern not likely to reflect selection for reproductive isolation, as – insects move between species in close sympatry – pollinator assemblages varied significantly with season and habitat – additional studies show among year & site variation in pollinators w. specie • Vespertine pollination characterizes C. howellii but appears to have arisen &/or been lost multiple times during speciation and radiation of Camassia lineages Acknowledgements Acknowledgements Particular thanks to..... Many people & Agencies! !!! Willamette Students 2006-2015 Summer Teams Jim Kephart Jenny Archibald et al. Theresa Culley et al. Kathryn Theiss Lowell Ahart & the Daley’s Ed Alverson This research was made possible by: David Hays, David Wilderman City of Salem, Oregon Parks Lawrence Janeway Earthwatch Institute Vonnie & Dan Lincoln MJ Murdock Charitable Trust Chris Wagner National Science Foundation UC Berkeley Sagehen Creek FS The Nature Conservancy Willamette University SCRP Bureau of Land Management, US Forest Service Camas Team 2015... Kudos! Sage Advice ....Future Studies “any classification scheme should be recognized as an hypothesis subject to testing and modification; and finally that there is no substitute for careful natural history.... knowledge about the natural world gained through observation, experimentation, and any other means available.” (Waser et al. 2011) From Oregon to Idaho, etc! Deciphering Species Interactions: The Future Challenges Discover: What are the species? integrating multiple criteria Morphological variation Dynamic in Space & time: What are the patterns, driving forces? Prioritize: What and why? theory and application Genetic structure Ecological differentiation Geography Disparity: 6 sp., 15 putative taxa Western region: putative origin & plexus of diversity (Gould 1942) .
Recommended publications
  • Sensitive Species That Are Not Listed Or Proposed Under the ESA Sorted By: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci

    Sensitive Species That Are Not Listed Or Proposed Under the ESA Sorted By: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci

    Forest Service Sensitive Species that are not listed or proposed under the ESA Sorted by: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci. Name; Legend: Page 94 REGION 10 REGION 1 REGION 2 REGION 3 REGION 4 REGION 5 REGION 6 REGION 8 REGION 9 ALTERNATE NATURESERVE PRIMARY MAJOR SUB- U.S. N U.S. 2005 NATURESERVE SCIENTIFIC NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME(S) COMMON NAME GROUP GROUP G RANK RANK ESA C 9 Anahita punctulata Southeastern Wandering Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G4 NNR 9 Apochthonius indianensis A Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1G2 N1N2 9 Apochthonius paucispinosus Dry Fork Valley Cave Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 Pseudoscorpion 9 Erebomaster flavescens A Cave Obligate Harvestman Invertebrate Arachnid G3G4 N3N4 9 Hesperochernes mirabilis Cave Psuedoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G5 N5 8 Hypochilus coylei A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G3? NNR 8 Hypochilus sheari A Lampshade Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 NNR 9 Kleptochthonius griseomanus An Indiana Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Kleptochthonius orpheus Orpheus Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 9 Kleptochthonius packardi A Cave Obligate Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 N2N3 9 Nesticus carteri A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid GNR NNR 8 Nesticus cooperi Lost Nantahala Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Nesticus crosbyi A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1? NNR 8 Nesticus mimus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2 NNR 8 Nesticus sheari A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR 8 Nesticus silvanus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR
  • Kalmiopsis : Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon

    Kalmiopsis : Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon

    Kalmiopsis Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon Yellow Cats Ear (Calochortus monophyllus) ISSN 1055-419X Volume 15, 2008 EDITORIAL Kalmiopsis Long-time readers of Kalmiopsis will notice that this is the Journal of the Native Plant Society of Oregon, ©2008 second appearance of Calochortus monophyllus on the cover. The first time was in 1993, shortly after Frank Callahan discovered it on Grizzly Peak. After leading field trips and diligently cataloging Editor the plants of Grizzly Peak for eleven years, Jim Duncan is the local expert for our Oregon Plants and Places feature. For the Cindy Roche, PhD Plant of the Year, Frank Lang helped me uncover the mysteries surrounding green-flowered wild ginger (Asarum wagneri), which was named for Dr.Warren (Herb) Wagner who, in his long career Editorial Board as professor of botany at the University of Michigan, influenced many students. Herb Wagner’s discoveries of Botrychium in the Frank A. Lang, PhD Wallowa Mountains are described in the article on fern diversity Susan Kephart, PhD in the Wallowa Mountains (explained A to Z) by Ed Alverson Rhoda M. Love, PhD and Peter Zika. These two have devoted many weeks to exploring this rugged terrain of northeastern Oregon, and describe how the substrates are keys to habitat. The Plant Hunters article tells the story of Thomas Jefferson Howell, who without education, NPSO Web Page financial backing, or academic resources, wrote the first flora of the Pacific Northwest, an admirable feat of perseverance. Proving http://www.NPSOregon.org that botanical discoveries are still possible, Frank Callahan shares the story of Hinds walnut, a native tree visible from Interstate 5 that, to date, has not been recognized in Oregon by a published flora.
  • ICBEMP Analysis of Vascular Plants

    ICBEMP Analysis of Vascular Plants

    APPENDIX 1 Range Maps for Species of Concern APPENDIX 2 List of Species Conservation Reports APPENDIX 3 Rare Species Habitat Group Analysis APPENDIX 4 Rare Plant Communities APPENDIX 5 Plants of Cultural Importance APPENDIX 6 Research, Development, and Applications Database APPENDIX 7 Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the Interior Columbia River Basin 122 APPENDIX 1 Range Maps for Species of Conservation Concern These range maps were compiled from data from State Heritage Programs in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, and Nevada. This information represents what was known at the end of the 1994 field season. These maps may not represent the most recent information on distribution and range for these taxa but it does illustrate geographic distribution across the assessment area. For many of these species, this is the first time information has been compiled on this scale. For the continued viability of many of these taxa, it is imperative that we begin to manage for them across their range and across administrative boundaries. Of the 173 taxa analyzed, there are maps for 153 taxa. For those taxa that were not tracked by heritage programs, we were not able to generate range maps. (Antmnnrin aromatica) ( ,a-’(,. .e-~pi~] i----j \ T--- d-,/‘-- L-J?.,: . ey SAP?E%. %!?:,KnC,$ESS -,,-a-c--- --y-- I -&zII~ County Boundaries w1. ~~~~ State Boundaries <ii&-----\ \m;qw,er Columbia River Basin .---__ ,$ 4 i- +--pa ‘,,, ;[- ;-J-k, Assessment Area 1 /./ .*#a , --% C-p ,, , Suecies Locations ‘V 7 ‘\ I, !. / :L __---_- r--j -.---.- Columbia River Basin s-5: ts I, ,e: I’ 7 j ;\ ‘-3 “.
  • Multilocus Phylogenetic Inference in Subfamily Chlorogaloideae and Related Genera of Agavaceae – Informing Questions in Taxonomy at Multiple Ranks ⇑ Jenny K

    Multilocus Phylogenetic Inference in Subfamily Chlorogaloideae and Related Genera of Agavaceae – Informing Questions in Taxonomy at Multiple Ranks ⇑ Jenny K

    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 84 (2015) 266–283 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Multilocus phylogenetic inference in subfamily Chlorogaloideae and related genera of Agavaceae – Informing questions in taxonomy at multiple ranks ⇑ Jenny K. Archibald a, , Susan R. Kephart b, Kathryn E. Theiss b, Anna L. Petrosky c, Theresa M. Culley d a Biodiversity Institute and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA b Department of Biology, Willamette University, Salem, OR 97301, USA c Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94709, USA d Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA article info abstract Article history: A series of taxonomic questions at the subfamilial, generic, and intrageneric levels have remained within Received 21 July 2014 subfamily Chlorogaloideae s.s. (comprising Camassia, Chlorogalum, Hastingsia, and Schoenolirion) and Revised 8 December 2014 relatives in Agavaceae. We present the first phylogenetic hypotheses focused on Chlorogaloideae that Accepted 16 December 2014 are based on multiple independent loci and include a wide sampling of outgroups across Agavaceae. In Available online 10 January 2015 addition to chloroplast regions ndhF and trnL–trnF, we used nrDNA ITS for phylogenetic inference. Incom- plete concerted evolution of the latter is indicated by intra-individual site polymorphisms for nearly half Keywords: of the individuals. Comparisons of four coding and analysis methods for these characters indicate that the Agavaceae region remains phylogenetically informative. Our results confirm that Chlorogaloideae s.s. is not Chlorogaloideae Chlorogalum monophyletic, due to the close relationship of Schoenolirion with Hesperaloe and Hesperoyucca, as well Hesperaloe as the likely sister relationship between Hesperocallis and core Chlorogaloideae (Camassia, Chlorogalum, Hesperocallis and Hastingsia).
  • Update of the Regional Forester's Special Status Species List

    Update of the Regional Forester's Special Status Species List

    United States Forest Pacific 333 SW First Avenue (97204) Department of Service Northwest PO Box 3623 Agriculture Region Portland, OR 97208-3623 503-808-2468 File Code: 2670 Date: December 9, 2011 Route To: (1930) Subject: Update of the Regional Forester's Special Status Species List To: Forest Supervisors This letter officially updates the Regional Forester’s Special Status Species (RFSSS) list, which includes federally listed, federally proposed, sensitive, and strategic species (Enclosure 1). Collectively, these species are referred to as “Special Status Species.” The updated lists reflect comments received from Forest Supervisors in response to the April 27, 2010, (2670/1950) letter requesting review of the draft list. “Strategic” species were included in the last update of the RFSSS list in January 2008. Strategic Species are not considered “sensitive” under Forest Service Manual (FSM) 2670 and do not need to be addressed in Biological Evaluations. Many strategic species are poorly known (i.e., distribution, habitat, threats, or taxonomy), so conservation status is unclear. Interagency Special Status/Sensitive Species Program (ISSSSP) staff in the Regional Office (RO) will coordinate with field units to compile information to improve understanding and clarify status. To this end, management direction for strategic species requires field units to record survey and location information in the agency’s corporate Natural Resource Information System (NRIS) databases (NRIS TES Plants for vascular plants, non-vascular plants and fungi; NRIS Wildlife for vertebrates and invertebrates; and NRIS Aquatic Surveys for aquatic invertebrates and fish). The criteria for determining sensitive or strategic status for a species are attached (Enclosure 2).
  • Multilocus Phylogenetic Inference in Subfamily Chlorogaloideae and Related Genera of Agavaceae – Informing Questions in Taxonomy at Multiple Ranks

    Multilocus Phylogenetic Inference in Subfamily Chlorogaloideae and Related Genera of Agavaceae – Informing Questions in Taxonomy at Multiple Ranks

    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 84 (2015) 266–283 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Multilocus phylogenetic inference in subfamily Chlorogaloideae and related genera of Agavaceae – Informing questions in taxonomy at multiple ranks a, b b c d Jenny K. Archibald ⇑, Susan R. Kephart , Kathryn E. Theiss , Anna L. Petrosky , Theresa M. Culley a Biodiversity Institute and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA b Department of Biology, Willamette University, Salem, OR 97301, USA c Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94709, USA d Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA article info abstract Article history: A series of taxonomic questions at the subfamilial, generic, and intrageneric levels have remained within Received 21 July 2014 subfamily Chlorogaloideae s.s. (comprising Camassia, Chlorogalum, Hastingsia, and Schoenolirion) and Revised 8 December 2014 relatives in Agavaceae. We present the first phylogenetic hypotheses focused on Chlorogaloideae that Accepted 16 December 2014 are based on multiple independent loci and include a wide sampling of outgroups across Agavaceae. In Available online 10 January 2015 addition to chloroplast regions ndhF and trnL–trnF, we used nrDNA ITS for phylogenetic inference. Incom- plete concerted evolution of the latter is indicated by intra-individual site polymorphisms for nearly half Keywords: of the individuals. Comparisons of four coding and analysis methods for these characters indicate that the Agavaceae region remains phylogenetically informative. Our results confirm that Chlorogaloideae s.s. is not Chlorogaloideae Chlorogalum monophyletic, due to the close relationship of Schoenolirion with Hesperaloe and Hesperoyucca, as well Hesperaloe as the likely sister relationship between Hesperocallis and core Chlorogaloideae (Camassia, Chlorogalum, Hesperocallis and Hastingsia).
  • Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Vascular Plants in Oregon

    Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Vascular Plants in Oregon

    RARE, THREATENED AND ENDANGERED VASCULAR PLANTS IN OREGON --AN INTERIM REPORT i •< . * •• Jean L. Siddall Kenton . Chambers David H. Wagner L Vorobik. 779 OREGON NATURAL AREA PRESERVES ADVISORY COMMITTEE to the State Land Board Salem, October, 1979 Natural Area Preserves Advisory Committee to the State Land Board Victor Atiyeh Norma Paulus Clay Myers Governor Secretary of State State Treasurer Members Robert E. Frenkel (Chairman), Corvallis Bruce Nolf (Vice Chairman), Bend Charles Collins, Roseburg Richard Forbes, Portland Jefferson Gonor, Newport Jean L. Siddall, Lake Oswego David H. Wagner, Eugene Ex-Officio Members Judith Hvam Will iam S. Phelps Department of Fish and Wildlife State Forestry Department Peter Bond J. Morris Johnson State Parks and Recreation Division State System of Higher Education Copies available from: Division of State Lands, 1445 State Street, Salem,Oregon 97310. Cover: Darlingtonia californica. Illustration by Linda Vorobik, Eugene, Oregon. RARE, THREATENED AND ENDANGERED VASCULAR PLANTS IN OREGON - an Interim Report by Jean L. Siddall Chairman Oregon Rare and Endangered Plant Species Taskforce Lake Oswego, Oregon Kenton L. Chambers Professor of Botany and Curator of Herbarium Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon David H. Wagner Director and Curator of Herbarium University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon Oregon Natural Area Preserves Advisory Committee Oregon State Land Board Division of State Lands Salem, Oregon October 1979 F O R E W O R D This report on rare, threatened and endangered vascular plants in Oregon is a basic document in the process of inventorying the state's natural areas * Prerequisite to the orderly establishment of natural preserves for research and conservation in Oregon are (1) a classification of the ecological types, and (2) a listing of the special organisms, which should be represented in a comprehensive system of designated natural areas.

  • Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon

    Portland State University PDXScholar Institute for Natural Resources Publications Institute for Natural Resources - Portland 10-2010 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon James S. Kagan Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Sue Vrilakas Oregon Biodiversity Information Center, [email protected] Eleanor P. Gaines Portland State University Cliff Alton Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Lindsey Koepke Oregon Biodiversity Information Center See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/naturalresources_pub Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Oregon Biodiversity Information Center. 2010. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon. Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon. 105 pp. This Book is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute for Natural Resources Publications by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors James S. Kagan, Sue Vrilakas, Eleanor P. Gaines, Cliff Alton, Lindsey Koepke, John A. Christy, and Erin Doyle This book is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/naturalresources_pub/24 RARE, THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF OREGON OREGON BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION CENTER October 2010 Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Institute for Natural Resources Portland State University PO Box 751, Mail Stop: INR Portland, OR 97207-0751 (503) 725-9950 http://orbic.pdx.edu With assistance from: Native Plant Society of Oregon The Nature Conservancy Oregon Department of Agriculture Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Oregon Department of State Lands Oregon Natural Heritage Advisory Council U.S.
  • Rare, Threatened, and Endangered

    Rare, Threatened, and Endangered

    Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Institute for Natural Resources Portland State University P.O. Box 751, Mail Stop: INR Portland, OR 97207-0751 (503) 725-9950 http://inr.oregonstate.edu/orbic With assistance from: U.S. Forest Service Bureau of Land Management U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service NatureServe OregonFlora at Oregon State University The Nature Conservancy Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Department of State Lands Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Oregon Department of Agriculture Native Plant Society of Oregon Compiled and published by the following staff at the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center: Jimmy Kagan, Director/Ecologist Sue Vrilakas, Botanist/Data Manager Eleanor Gaines, Zoologist Lindsey Wise, Botanist/Data Manager Michael Russell, Botanist/Ecologist Cayla Sigrah, GIS and Database Support Specialist Cover Photo: Charadrius nivosus (Snowy plover chick and adult). Photo by Cathy Tronquet. ORBIC Street Address: Portland State University, Science and Education Center, 2112 SW Fifth Ave., Suite 140, Portland, Oregon, 97201 ORBIC Mailing Address: Portland State University, Mail Stop: INR, P.O. Box 751, Portland, Oregon 97207-0751 Bibliographic reference to this publication should read: Oregon Biodiversity Information Center. 2019. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon. Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon. 133 pp. CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................
  • Halpin MS Thesis Final

    Halpin MS Thesis Final

    A CHLOROPLAST PHYLOGENY OF AGAVACEAE SUBFAMILY CHLOROGALOIDEAE WITH A FOCUS ON SPECIES RELATIONSHIPS IN HASTINGSIA By KATE MAUREEN HALPIN Master of Science in Botany Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 2011 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May, 2011 A CHLOROPLAST PHYLOGENY OF AGAVACEAE SUBFAMILY CHLOROGALOIDEAE WITH A FOCUS ON SPECIES RELATIONSHIPS IN HASTINGSIA Thesis Approved: Dr. Mark Fishbein Thesis Adviser Dr. Linda Watson Dr. Andrew Doust Dr. Mark E. Payton Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work would not have been possible without the support of the Oklahoma State University Botany Department faculty and support staff, who I am especially grateful for fully welcoming me into their program during this project’s final year. I would particularly like to thank my thesis advisor Mark Fishbein and committee members Linda Watson and Andrew Doust: their advice and comments improved every stage of this work. Financial support for this work was provided by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists, the Native Plant Society of Oregon, and the Portland State University Creative and Scholarly Activity Grant. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................1 Serpentine soils........................................................................................................1 Chlorogaloideae.......................................................................................................5
  • Cam) in the Agavoideae (Asparagaceae

    Cam) in the Agavoideae (Asparagaceae

    EVOLUTIONARY PHYSIOLOGY AND TRANSCRIPTOMICS OF CRASSULACEAN ACID METABOLISM (CAM) IN THE AGAVOIDEAE (ASPARAGACEAE) by CAROLINE HEYDUK (Under the Direction of Jim Leebens-Mack) ABSTRACT Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) is a mode of photosynthesis found in ~6% of flowering plants and serves as an adaptation to water-limited habitats. CAM plants open their stomata for gas exchange at night, when transpiration rates are lower, and fix CO2 via an alternative pathway. Carbon is stored as organic acids during the night, then decarboxylated during the day behind closed stomata. CAM results in high levels of CO2 around RuBisCO, the primary carbon-fixing enzyme in all green plants, with minimal water loss. Although CAM occurs in at least 35 separate lineages, its evolutionary trajectory from C3 is unknown. Here we explore the evolutionary patterns of CAM across the Agavoideae, a subfamily of species that includes Agave and Yucca. Anatomical observations paired with character evolution show that species of the Agavoideae may have been preadapted to the CAM syndrome, with many C3 species showing CAM-like morphology. Comparative physiology was explored in more detail in a Yucca hybrid system, where a CAM and C3 species hybridized to form a C3-CAM intermediate. The parents and hybrid offspring were characterized for anatomical and physiological traits and show the hybrid is able to convert from C3 carbon fixation to 100% CAM uptake under periods of drought stress. Finally, the hybrid system in Yucca was used to understand the transcriptional regulation of the CAM pathway; despite lacking any CAM anatomy or physiology, the C3 parental species shows similar gene expression patterns as the CAM species, indicating perhaps an ancestral gene expression pattern that enabled the evolution of CAM in a subset of Yucca species.
  • 2016. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon

    2016. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon

    RARE, THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF OREGON OREGON BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION CENTER August 2016 Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Institute for Natural Resources Portland State University P.O. Box 751, Mail Stop: INR Portland, OR 97207-0751 (503) 725-9950 http://inr.oregonstate.edu/orbic With assistance from: U.S. Forest Service Bureau of Land Management U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service NatureServe Oregon Flora Project at Oregon State University The Nature Conservancy Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Oregon Department of State Lands Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Oregon Department of Agriculture Native Plant Society of Oregon Compiled and published by the following staff at the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center: Jimmy Kagan, Director/Ecologist Sue Vrilakas, Botanist/Data Manager John Christy, Wetlands Ecologist/Bryologist Eleanor Gaines, Zoologist Lindsey Wise, Botanist/Data Manager Cameron Pahl, Data Specialist Kathy Howell, Volunteer Cover Photo: Botrychium pumicola (Pumice grape-fern) at Crater Lake National Park. Photo by Dan Mathews. ORBIC Street Address: Portland State University, Science and Education Center, 2112 SW Fifth Ave., Suite 140, Portland, Oregon, 97201 ORBIC Mailing Address: Portland State University, Mail Stop: INR, P.O. Box 751, Portland, Oregon 97207-0751 Bibliographic reference to this publication should read: Oregon Biodiversity Information Center. 2016. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon. Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon. 130