DOCSLIB.ORG

Biomechanical Basis of Wing and Haltere Coordination in Flies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biomechanical Basis of Wing and Haltere Coordination in Flies Biomechanical basis of wing and haltere coordination in flies Tanvi Deora, Amit Kumar Singh, and Sanjay P. Sane1 National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bangalore 560065, India Edited by M. A. R. Koehl, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved December 16, 2014 (received for review June 30, 2014) The spectacular success and diversification of insects rests critically unclear, especially in its ability to mediate rapid wing movement. on two major evolutionary adaptations. First, the evolution of flight, Moreover, faster wing movements require rapid sensory motor which enhanced the ability of insects to colonize novel ecological integration by the insect nervous system. The hind wings of habitats, evade predators, or hunt prey; and second, the miniatur- Diptera have evolved into a pair of mechanosensory halteres that ization of their body size, which profoundly influenced all aspects of detect gyroscopic forces during flight (10–13). The rapid feed- their biology from development to behavior. However, miniaturi- back from halteres is essential for flies to sense and control self- zation imposes steep demands on the flight system because smaller rotations during complex aerobatic maneuvers (13–15). In the insects must flap their wings at higher frequencies to generate majority of flies, the bilateral wings move in-phase, whereas sufficient aerodynamic forces to stay aloft; it also poses challenges halteres move antiphase relative to the wings. This relative co- to the sensorimotor system because precise control of wing ordination between wings and halteres is extremely precise even kinematics and body trajectories requires fast sensory feedback. at frequencies far exceeding 100 Hz. How do wings and halteres These tradeoffs are best studied in Dipteran flies in which rapid maintain precise coordination at such rapid frequencies? There mechanosensory feedback to wing motor system is provided by are two principal hypotheses to address this question. First, as halteres, reduced hind wings that evolved into gyroscopic sensors. suggested by Pringle (13) in his pioneering studies on halteres, Halteres oscillate at the same frequency as and precisely antiphase the wings and halteres, although driven by independent set of to the wings; they detect body rotations during flight, thus myogenic muscles, may be mechanically coupled. Second, be- providing feedback that is essential for controlling wing motion cause haltere sensory feedback influences wing motor neurons during aerial maneuvers. Although tight phase synchrony between (14), it may also be required to drive the precise coordination of halteres and wings is essential for providing proper timing cues, the wing and haltere motion. To address these questions, it is nec- mechanisms underlying this coordination are not well understood. essary to understand the contribution of thoracic mechanics and Here, we identify specific mechanical linkages within the thorax its role in modulating wing kinematics through the wing hinge. Here, we show that the biomechanics of the thorax and wing that passively mediate both wing–wing and wing–haltere phase hinge is essential for wing–wing and wing–haltere coordination, synchronization. We demonstrate that the wing hinge must possess as well as in mediating the independent control of each wing. a clutch system that enables flies to independently engage or dis- engage each wing from the mechanically linked thorax. In concert Results with a previously described gearbox located within the wing hinge, To address these questions, it is first necessary to clearly visualize the clutch system enables independent control of each wing. These the moving halteres in rapidly flapping insect. Hence, we studied biomechanical features are essential for flight control in flies. these questions in the soldier fly, Hermetia illucens, because their naturally white halteres could be easily visualized during flight insect thorax | halteres | insect wings | wing hinge | wing clutch (SI Materials and Methods, Fly-Rearing Procedure). Under teth- ered and untethered conditions, soldier flies synchronously flap rom giant Atlas moths (wingspan ∼30 cm) to microscopic their two wings in-phase, whereas their halteres move antiphase Fwasps (wingspan ∼400 μm) (1), flying insects span nearly three orders of magnitude in body size. Smaller insects typically Significance flap their wings at frequencies that often exceed 100 Hz, thereby limiting the ability of their nervous system to exercise stroke-to- Insect wing movements must be both precise and fast. This stroke nervous control (2). The insect musculoskeletal system has requirement is especially challenging in smaller insects whose evolved several adaptations that enable high wing-beat frequen- flapping frequencies exceed 100 Hz, because the nervous sys- cies. Key among these adaptations is the evolution of specialized tem cannot exercise stroke-by-stroke control at such rates. In myogenic or asynchronous flight muscles in combination with the flies, the hind wings have evolved into halteres, gyroscopic indirect flight muscle (IFM) architecture in insects of the order sense organs that oscillate exactly antiphase to wings. We Diptera, Coleoptera, some Hymenoptera, and Hemiptera (Fig. show that wing–wing and wing–haltere coordination at high 1A). Asynchronous muscles are stretch activated, which means frequencies is mediated by passive biomechanical linkages in that they are primarily activated by externally imposed stretches thorax. This system requires a clutch mechanism in the wing due to thoracic deformation (3), although periodic neural stimu- hinge to independently engage each wing with the vibrating lation is required to maintain the calcium levels for muscle con- thorax. Once the wings are engaged, the gearbox modulates tractility; thus, cycle-by-cycle activation of their motor neurons is the amplitude of each wing. Thus, the force transmission not necessary in these muscles (4). Contraction of dorsoventral mechanism from thorax to wings in flies bears remarkable EVOLUTION muscles causes extension of the antagonistic dorsolongitudinal similarity to automobile transmission systems. muscles and vice versa, thereby setting up resonant oscillations of the thoracic cavity, which are then translated via a complex wing Author contributions: T.D. and S.P.S. designed research; T.D. and A.K.S. performed re- hinge into large-amplitude wing movements (3, 5–8). The subtler search; T.D., A.K.S., and S.P.S. analyzed data; and T.D. and S.P.S. wrote the paper. alterations in wing kinematics are actuated by separate sets of The authors declare no conflict of interest. steering muscles controlled by direct input from motor neurons This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. within the thoracic ganglia (4, 9). 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]. The kinematic changes are mediated via a complex wing hinge This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. (4), but the function and composition of the hinge remains quite 1073/pnas.1412279112/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1412279112 PNAS | February 3, 2015 | vol. 112 | no. 5 | 1481–1486 Downloaded by guest on September 29, 2021 A Anterior Instead, these experiments show that wings and halteres are co- ordinated by mechanical linkages embedded within the thorax (13). Dorsal Scutum Lateral Anterior Dorso-ventral muscles Dorso-longitudinal muscles Wing–Wing Coordination Is Mediated via Linkages Within the Scutellum Scutellar lever arm Scutellum. The Dipteran thorax is subdivided into two parts: Haltere a large anterior scutum, followed by a posterior small scutellum, Sub-epimeral Ridge which is the reduced hind thorax (Fig. 1A). To identify the Haltere muscle linkages within the thorax, we made systematic lesions on the dorsal surface of the scutum or scutellum in live, tethered flies to disrupt strain transfer between wings, and filmed the wing and haltere motion (SI Materials and Methods, Wing–Wing and Wing– – Wing Haltere Coordination Experiments). The wing wing coordination data from these experiments were compared with the control B C right wing right haltere group in which there is near-exact phase synchrony of the flapping left wing right wing 1 wings (Fig. 1C). In a scutum-lesioned group (Materials and Meth- 0.4 ods), we made systematic surgical cuts along the scutum while 0.5 0 keeping the scutellum intact (Fig. S1). If the linkage system is lo- 0 cated within the scutum, the coordination between wings should be -0.4 -0.5 disrupted. However, the wings flapped in-phase similar to controls, -1 suggesting that the linkage was not in the scutum (Fig. 2A). In Wing position (rad) -0.8 140 160 180 200 220 240 contrast, wing–wing coordination in the scutellum-lesioned group Wing/Haltere position (rad) 70 80 90 100 11 0 120 130 Time (msec) Time(msec) of flies was significantly disrupted (Fig. 2B and Movies S4 and S5) (17) but was restored in scutellum-reattached flies, in which the slit D Wing-Wing E Wing-Haltere scutellum was glued by an adhesive (Fig. 2C). Thus, the bilateral 90 90 wings in flies are mechanically linked via the scutellum. Although 120 120 60 60 the wing–wing coordination in scutellum-lesioned flies was se- 150 30 150 30 verely impaired, their halteres maintained antiphase coordina- tion to ipsilateral wings (Fig. 2D) similar to control flies (Fig. 1E), 180 0 180 0 but haltere–haltere coordination was disrupted (Fig. 2E). Thus, 210 330 210 330 240 300 240 300 270 270 A B C Scutellum Scutellum Fig. 1. Wings and halteres are precisely coordinated at high frequencies ≥100 Sham lesioned lesioned reattached Hz. (A) Diagram of Dipteran thorax in lateral and dorsal view. (B) The right (gray) and the left (black) wings move in phase with each other. (C)Thewing (black) and the ipsilateral haltere (gray) move antiphase to each other. (D) Wing-Wing Wing-Wing Wing-Wing – 90 90 90 Vector strength representation of control data for wing wing phase (teth- 120 60 120 60 120 60 ered flies; n = 6; mean phase angle ϕ = 5.63°, vector length r = 0.9965; P < 150 30 150 30 150 30 0.001; nonparametric Moore’s test for uniformity).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SHOO FLY! Houseflies, Those Pesky Flying Insects That Show up Uninvited
    SHOO FLY! Houseflies, those pesky flying insects that show up uninvited at your summer picnic or slip into your house if you leave a door open too long, are so annoying. Sometimes it seems that they are everywhere! Did you know that there are more than 100,000 different kinds of flies? The housefly is frequently found around humans and on farms and ranches that raise animals. Flies are pests. Not only are they annoying, they also spread diseases to humans. Flies eat rotten things like dead animals, feces (poop), and garbage. As they crawl around on that stuff they pick up germs and spread them wherever they land. Flies are decomposers, living things (such as bacteria, fungus, or insect) that feed on and break down plant and animal matter into simpler parts. Decomposers act as a clean up crew and perform an important job, making sure all of that plant and animal matter doesn’t pile up. Fly Facts: Instead of having a skeleton inside their bodies, flies are hard on the outside and soft on the inside. Their type of skeleton is called an exoskeleton. Flies eat only liquid food. If they land on solid food, they spit on it through their proboscis (part of their mouth). This softens the food so they can eat it. A fly’s tongue is shaped like a straw to sip their food. Since they eat only liquids, flies poop a lot. It is thought that they poop every time they land, so they leave poop everywhere! Flies are very hard to swat because of their excellent eyesight, fast reaction time, and agility (the ability to move quickly and easily).
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquitos Fail at Flight in Heavy Fog 19 November 2012
    Mosquitos fail at flight in heavy fog 19 November 2012 Mosquitos have the remarkable ability to fly in clear These halteres are on a comparable size to the fog skies as well as in rain, shrugging off impacts from droplets and they flap approximately 400 times raindrops more than 50 times their body mass. But each second, striking thousands of drops per just like modern aircraft, mosquitos also are second. Though the halteres can normally repel grounded when the fog thickens. Researchers from water, repeated collisions with 5-micron fog the Georgia Institute of Technology present their particles hinders flight control, leading to flight findings at the 65th meeting of the American failure. Physical Society's (APS) Division of Fluid Dynamics, Nov. 18 - 20, in San Diego, Calif. "Thus the halteres cannot sense their position correctly and malfunction, similarly to how "Raindrop and fog impacts affect mosquitoes quite windshield wipers fail to work well when the rain is differently," said Georgia Tech researcher Andrew very heavy or if there is snow on the windshield," Dickerson. "From a mosquito's perspective, a said Dickerson. "This study shows us that insect falling raindrop is like us being struck by a small flight is similar to human flight in aircraft in that flight car. A fog particle – weighing 20 million times less is not possible when the insects cannot sense their than a mosquito – is like being struck by a crumb. surroundings." For humans, visibility hinders flight; Thus, fog is to a mosquito as rain is to a human." whereas for insects it is their gyroscopic flight sensors." On average during a rainstorm, mosquitos get struck by a drop once every 20 seconds, but fog More information: The talk, "Mosquito Flight particles surround the mosquito continuously as it Failure in Heavy Fog," is at 5 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Order ID: Diptera (Flies, Gnats, Midges, Mosquitoes, Maggots)
    Return to insect order home Page 1 of 3 Visit us on the Web: www.gardeninghelp.org Insect Order ID: Diptera (Flies, Gnats, Midges, Mosquitoes, Maggots) Life Cycle–Complete metamorphosis: Adults lay eggs. Eggs hatch into larvae (maggots, wigglers, etc.). Larvae eat, grow and molt. This stage is repeated a varying number of times, depending on species, until hormonal changes cause larvae to pupate. Inside the pupal case the pupae change in form and in color and develop wings. The emerging adults look completely different from the larvae. Adults–All (except a few wingless species) have only one pair of membranous wings, thus the name Diptera meaning "two wings". The forewings are fully developed and functional, while the hindwings are reduced to knobbed clubs called halteres, which are difficult to see without magnification except for larger specimens (e.g., crane flies). They are the best fliers in the insect world and possibly beyond: they can hover, fly backwards and upside-down and turn on the spot. Their eyes are usually large and multi-faceted, with males usually having larger eyes than females. Although many mimic bees and wasps, none have stingers. The order Diptera comprises two main suborders: long-horned (Nematocera) and short-horned Brachycera). Nematocera have long legs, long antennae and look fragile (e.g., mosquitoes, gnats, and midges, etc.) while Brachycera have stout bodies and short, stout antennae (e.g., horse flies, house flies, robber flies, hover flies, etc.). (Click images to enlarge or orange text for more information.) One pair of wings One pair of halteres Large, multifaceted eyes Robust-looking Short, stubby antennae Fragile-looking Many species are tiny Brachycera (Brachycera) Nematocera (Nematocera) Return to insect order home Page 2 of 3 Eggs–Adults lay eggs, usually where larval food is plentiful.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii
    Chapter Phylogeny and Functional Morphology of Diptera (Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii Abstract The order Diptera includes all true flies. Members of this order are the most ecologically diverse and probably have a greater economic impact on humans than any other group of insects. The application of explicit methods of phylogenetic and morphological analysis has revealed weaknesses in the traditional classification of dipteran insects, but little progress has been made to achieve a robust, stable clas- sification that reflects evolutionary relationships and morphological adaptations for a more precise understanding of their developmental biology and behavioral ecol- ogy. The current status of Diptera phylogenetics is reviewed in this chapter. Also, key aspects of the morphology of the different life stages of the flies, particularly characters useful for taxonomic purposes and for an understanding of the group’s biology have been described with an emphasis on newer contributions and progress in understanding this important group of insects. Keywords: Tephritoidea, Diptera flies, Nematocera, Brachycera metamorphosis, larva 1. Introduction Phylogeny refers to the evolutionary history of a taxonomic group of organisms. Phylogeny is essential in understanding the biodiversity, genetics, evolution, and ecology among groups of organisms [1, 2]. Functional morphology involves the study of the relationships between the structure of an organism and the function of the various parts of an organism. The old adage “form follows function” is a guiding principle of functional morphology. It helps in understanding the ways in which body structures can be used to produce a wide variety of different behaviors, including moving, feeding, fighting, and reproducing. It thus, integrates concepts from physiology, evolution, anatomy and development, and synthesizes the diverse ways that biological and physical factors interact in the lives of organisms [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Representation of Haltere Oscillations and Integration with Visual Inputs in the Fly Central Complex
    4100 • The Journal of Neuroscience, May 22, 2019 • 39(21):4100–4112 Systems/Circuits Representation of Haltere Oscillations and Integration with Visual Inputs in the Fly Central Complex X Nicholas D. Kathman and XJessica L. Fox Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106 The reduced hindwings of flies, known as halteres, are specialized mechanosensory organs that detect body rotations during flight. Primary afferents of the haltere encode its oscillation frequency linearly over a wide bandwidth and with precise phase-dependent spiking. However, it is not currently known whether information from haltere primary afferent neurons is sent to higher brain centers where sensory information about body position could be used in decision making, or whether precise spike timing is useful beyond the peripheral circuits that drive wing movements. We show that in cells in the central brain, the timing and rates of neural spiking can be modulatedbysensoryinputfromexperimentalhalteremovements(drivenbyaservomotor).Usingmultichannelextracellularrecording in restrained flesh flies (Sarcophaga bullata of both sexes), we examined responses of central complex cells to a range of haltere oscillation frequencies alone, and in combination with visual motion speeds and directions. Haltere-responsive units fell into multiple response classes, including those responding to any haltere motion and others with firing rates linearly related to the haltere frequency. Cells with multisensory responses showed higher firing rates than the sum of the unisensory responses at higher haltere frequencies. They also maintained visual properties, such as directional selectivity, while increasing response gain nonlinearly with haltere frequency. Although haltere inputs have been described extensively in the context of rapid locomotion control, we find haltere sensory information in a brain region known to be involved in slower, higher-order behaviors, such as navigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods of Public Health Significance in California
    ARTHROPODS OF PUBLIC HEALTH SIGNIFICANCE IN CALIFORNIA California Department of Public Health Vector Control Technician Certification Training Manual Category C ARTHROPODS OF PUBLIC HEALTH SIGNIFICANCE IN CALIFORNIA Category C: Arthropods A Training Manual for Vector Control Technician’s Certification Examination Administered by the California Department of Health Services Edited by Richard P. Meyer, Ph.D. and Minoo B. Madon M V C A s s o c i a t i o n of C a l i f o r n i a MOSQUITO and VECTOR CONTROL ASSOCIATION of CALIFORNIA 660 J Street, Suite 480, Sacramento, CA 95814 Date of Publication - 2002 This is a publication of the MOSQUITO and VECTOR CONTROL ASSOCIATION of CALIFORNIA For other MVCAC publications or further informaiton, contact: MVCAC 660 J Street, Suite 480 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 440-0826 Fax: (916) 442-4182 E-Mail: [email protected] Web Site: http://www.mvcac.org Copyright © MVCAC 2002. All rights reserved. ii Arthropods of Public Health Significance CONTENTS PREFACE ........................................................................................................................................ v DIRECTORY OF CONTRIBUTORS.............................................................................................. vii 1 EPIDEMIOLOGY OF VECTOR-BORNE DISEASES ..................................... Bruce F. Eldridge 1 2 FUNDAMENTALS OF ENTOMOLOGY.......................................................... Richard P. Meyer 11 3 COCKROACHES ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2, Chapter 12-17: Terrestrial Insects: Holometabola
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Terrestrial Insects: Holometabola – Diptera Overview. Chapt. 12-17. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. 12-17-1 Volume 2. Bryological Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 19 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 12-17 TERRESTRIAL INSECTS: HOLOMETABOLA – DIPTERA BIOLOGY AND HABITATS TABLE OF CONTENTS Diptera Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 12-17-2 Role of Bryophytes ................................................................................................................................. 12-17-3 Collection and Extraction Methods ......................................................................................................... 12-17-6 Fly Dispersal of Spores ........................................................................................................................... 12-17-8 Habitats ........................................................................................................................................................ 12-17-13 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................................... 12-17-13 Forests ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Halteres for the Micromechanical Flying Insect ∗
    Halteres for the Micromechanical Flying Insect ¤ W.C. Wu R.J. Wood R.S. Fearing Department of EECS, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 fwcwu, rjwood, [email protected] Abstract MFI. On the other hand, piezoelectric vibrating struc- tures have been developed and have proven to be able The mechanism which real flying insects use to de- to detect Coriolis force with high accuracy [8]. There- tect body rotation has been simulated. The results show fore, based on the gyroscopic sensing of real flies, a that an angular rate sensor can be made based on such novel design using piezoelectric devices is being con- a biological mechanism. Two types of biomimetic gy- sidered. This paper describes the simulations and fab- roscopes have been constructed using foils of stainless rication of this type of biologically inspired angular steel. The ¯rst device is connected directly to a com- rate sensor for use on the MFI. pliant cantilever. The second device is placed on a mechanically amplifying fourbar structure. Both de- 2 Haltere Morphology vices are driven by piezoelectric actuators and detect the Coriolis force using strain gages. The experimental Research on insect flight revealed that in order to results show successful measurements of angular veloc- maintain stable flight, insects use structures, called ities and these devices have the bene¯ts of low power halteres, to detect body rotations via gyroscopic forces and high sensitivity. [5]. The halteres of a fly evolved from hindwings and are hidden in the space between thorax and abdomen 1 Introduction so that air current has negligible e®ect on them (see ¯gure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • HALTERE MEDIATED FLIGHT STABILIZATION in DIPTERA: RATE DECOUPLING, SENSORY ENCODING, and CONTROL REALIZATION by Rhoe A. Thompson August 2009 Chair: Dr
    HALTERE MEDIATED FLIGHT STABILIZATION IN DIPTERA: RATE DECOUPLING, SENSORY ENCODING, AND CONTROL REALIZATION By RHOE A. THOMPSON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2009 1 °c 2009 Rhoe A. Thompson 2 I dedicate this work to my wife, Ann, and children, Ryan, Rachel, and Jessica. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge my committee chair, Dr. Warren Dixon, for his timely words of encouragement and the example he has provided. His passion for his work and professionalism have been a motivational factor in the success of all of his students. I would also like to acknowledge the other members of my committee, Dr. Carl Crane, Dr. Norman Fitz-Coy, Dr. Daniel Hahn, Mr. Ric Wehling and Mr. Johnny Evers for taking the time to review my work and for providing insightful suggestions for improvement. I would like to acknowledge the many distinguished professors I have learned from over the years at the University of Florida, one of the most memorable being the late Prof. Knox Millsaps. To the dismay of some students, Prof. Millsaps would at times spend much of his class telling fascinating stories about his career and the historical ¯gures he had encountered. He told us once, \Learning is best accomplished late at night, solving problems in the company of a good text book and a desk lamp." I have come to believe that the stories he told to motivate the desire to learn were at least as important as the examples he worked on the board.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual of the Families and Genera of North American Diptera
    iviobcow,, Idaho. tvl • Compliments of S. W. WilliSTON. State University, Lawrence, Kansas, U.S.A. Please acknowledge receipt. \e^ ^ MANUAL FAMILIES AND GENERA ]^roRTH American Diptera/ SFXOND EDITION REWRITTEN AND ENLARGED SAMUEL W^' WILLISTON, M.D., Ph.D. (Yale) PROFESSOR OF PALEONTOLOGY AND ANATOMY UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS AUG 2 1961 NEW HAVEN JAMES T. HATHAWAY 297 CROWN ST. NEAR YALE COLLEGE 18 96 Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1896, Bv JAMES T. HATHAWAY, In the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. PREFACE Eight years ago the author of the present work published a small volume in which he attempted to tabulate the families and more important genera of the diptera of the United States. From the use that has been made of that work by etitomological students, he has been encouraged to believe that the labor of its preparation was not in vain. The extra- ordinary activity in the investigation of our dipterological fauna within the past few years has, however, largely destroy- ed its usefulness, and it is hoped that this new edition, or rather this new work, will prove as serviceable as has been the former one. In the present work there has been an at- tempt to include all the genera now known from north of South America. While the Central and West Indian faunas are preeminently of the South American type, there are doubt- less many forms occurring in tlie southern states that are at present known only from more southern regions. In the preparation of the work the author has been aided by the examination, so far as he was able, of extensive col- lections from the West Indies and Central America submitted to him for study by Dr.
    [Show full text]