Mechanics of the Thorax in Flies Tanvi Deora1, Namrata Gundiah2 and Sanjay P
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
© 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2017) 220, 1382-1395 doi:10.1242/jeb.128363 REVIEW Mechanics of the thorax in flies Tanvi Deora1, Namrata Gundiah2 and Sanjay P. Sane1,* ABSTRACT body size, which greatly facilitated adaptability by increasing their Insects represent more than 60% of all multicellular life forms, and are ecological range; and two, the evolution of flight, which enabled easily among the most diverse and abundant organisms on earth. dispersal, migration, predation or rapid escape from predator They evolved functional wings and the ability to fly, which enabled attacks. them to occupy diverse niches. Insects of the hyper-diverse orders Although miniature body forms are a common evolutionary trend show extreme miniaturization of their body size. The reduced body among other animals, including birds and mammals (e.g. Hanken size, however, imposes steep constraints on flight ability, as their and Wake, 1993), miniaturization takes on a rather extreme form in wings must flap faster to generate sufficient forces to stay aloft. Here, insects. For example, the size of adult parasitic chalcid wasps such ∼ we discuss the various physiological and biomechanical adaptations as Kikiki huna ( 150 µm) or the trichogrammatid wasp ∼ of the thorax in flies which enabled them to overcome the myriad Megaphragma mymaripenne ( 170 µm) is comparable to that of constraints of small body size, while ensuring very precise control of some unicellular protozoan organisms (Polilov, 2012, 2015); these their wing motion. One such adaptation is the evolution of specialized wasps are among the smallest metazoans ever described. Such myogenic or asynchronous muscles that power the high-frequency extreme miniaturization is especially common among parasitoid – wing motion, in combination with neurogenic or synchronous steering insects belonging to three of the five insect groups Diptera (flies), – muscles that control higher-order wing kinematic patterns. Hymenoptera (wasps) and some families of Coleoptera (beetles) Additionally, passive cuticular linkages within the thorax coordinate which have evolved a lifestyle that, for the most part, is contained fast and yet precise bilateral wing movement, in combination with an within another organism, or even the eggs of other insects (Sane, actively controlled clutch and gear system that enables flexible flight 2016). Whereas Megaphragma are among the smallest winged patterns. Thus, the study of thoracic biomechanics, along with the insects, the wingless males of the egg parasitoid wasp Dicopomorpha underlying sensory-motor processing, is central in understanding (body length of 140 µm; Mockford, 1997) are even smaller. The how the insect body form is adapted for flight. smallest free-living non-parasitic insects, such as the Ptiliidae beetles (body length of 300–400 µm), with feathery hind-wings (Sorensson, KEY WORDS: Miniaturization, Biomechanics, Asynchronous 1997), are only slightly larger. At the other end of the size spectrum muscles, Insect flight, Gear box, Clutch mechanism, Mechanical are certain species of Lepidoptera, which are among the largest extant linkages insect species (e.g. the Queen Alexandra’s birdwing or saturniid Atlas moths, with wing spans of 25–30 cm), although the maximum Introduction diversity is skewed towards the micro-lepidopteran body size. In Insects are by far the most successful metazoan taxa and represent general, the selective evolutionary pressures that impinge on insect over 60% of all animals on earth (Zhang, 2013a). With nearly a size are the subject of much speculation, with some recent results million species already described and putative estimates saturating arguing that insect diversification may be independent of body size at 8 million, insects exceed by two orders of magnitude the next (Rainford et al., 2016). most species-rich group, arachnids (Mora et al., 2011). They occupy Gigantism and miniaturization in insects presents a curious varied niches across habitats ranging from domestic kitchen corners scientific problem: what limits insect size at both ends of the size to inhospitable Antarctica, which – despite temperatures as low as spectrum? Moreover, how do insects maintain aerial flight ability at −89°C – is home to the flightless midge Belgica antarctica. Insects length scales ranging over a staggering three orders of magnitude? are commonly categorized into 29 orders, of which 27 are Insect gigantism during the Carboniferous and Permian periods is pterygotes, or winged insects (Misof, 2014). Of these, five often attributed to the peak in oxygen levels (Graham et al., 1995; prominent orders – Diptera (flies), Hymenoptera (bees and Harrison et al., 2010), which coincides with fossil records wasps), Coleoptera (beetles), Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) of giant dragonflies (order Protoodonata; wingspan ∼70 cm), and sometimes Hemiptera (true bugs) – are classified as ‘major’ or mayflies (order Ephemeroptera; wingspan ∼20 cm) and some ‘hyper-diverse’ because they account for nearly 80–90% of all paleodicytopteran insects (wingspan ∼55 cm) (Carpenter, 1953). A extant insect species (Dudley, 2000; Zhang, 2013b). In addition to subsequent drop in atmospheric oxygen levels during the late the evolution of holometaboly (i.e. complete metamorphosis; e.g. Permian coincided with extinction of these giant insects (Graham Nicholson et al., 2014) in the first four of these orders, the et al., 1995). The physiological basis of the oxygen–size correlation evolutionary success of hyper-diverse orders is thought to predicate is unclear (Klok et al., 2009; Clapham and Karr, 2012). One on the combination of two major factors: one, the evolution of small hypothesis invokes the passive gas transport across the highly branched tracheal respiration system of insects as a limiting factor 1National Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, for body size (Dudley, 2000), although this view has been GKVK campus, Bellary Road, Bangalore, Karnataka 560065, India. 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka 560012, challenged by studies that show active transport within trachea India. (Lehmann, 2001; Westneat et al., 2003). Alternatively, the upper and lower bounds on insect sizes may be set by biomechanical, *Author for correspondence ([email protected]) rather than physiological, limitations. In large flying insects, these S.P.S., 0000-0002-8274-1181 would be manifest due to limits imposed by the flexural stiffness of Journal of Experimental Biology 1382 REVIEW Journal of Experimental Biology (2017) 220, 1382-1395 doi:10.1242/jeb.128363 From the flight perspective, the phenomenon of miniaturization is Glossary particularly interesting because it touches upon many facets of Aerodynamic force coefficient flight, ranging from the diverse physical and physiological A non-dimensional or scale-free measure of the aerodynamic challenges for generating forces and energetics, to the substantial effectiveness of an airfoil of specific geometry in generating forces. ecological impact of small-sized insects (e.g. Sane, 2016). It also Angle of attack points to neat evolutionary tricks that may serve as inspiration for The angle at which the inclined airfoil experiences the incident ambient engineers aiming to build micro-robotic flappers. In this Review, we fluid. specifically discuss the thoracic adaptations that enable small Apophysis insects to generate powerful, high-frequency wing strokes while An elongate projection of the fly cuticle, often as invaginations into the precisely coordinating their rapid flight movements. thorax serving as attachment points for muscles. Asynchronous (or myogenic) muscle Aerodynamic constraints of miniaturization A special class of muscle found in certain insect species where the Flapping insect wings are subject to unsteady aerodynamic forces that muscle contraction rate is decoupled (or asynchronous) from the neural have been the topic of intense study in the past two decades (e.g. input rate, resulting in multiple muscle contractions for each neural input. Sane, 2003; Chin and Lentink, 2016). These forces primarily result Bistable click mechanism from aerodynamic mechanisms owing to leading edge vortices A wing motion mechanism suggested by Boettiger and Furshpan (1952) based on two stable wing positions – extreme dorsal and extreme ventral produced during wing translation (Ellington et al., 1996), rotational mechanisms during pronation and supination of the wing (Dickinson in CCl4-anesthetized flies. They proposed that wing motion was a result of clicking between these two stable positions. This hypothesis was later et al., 1999), and other mechanisms such as ‘clap-and-fling’ (see rejected by Miyan and Ewing (1985a,b) based on high-speed videos and Glossary) which are observed more commonly in miniature insects study of the wing hinge morphology of liquid nitrogen frozen flies in mid- (Weis-Fogh, 1973). Miniaturization of the insect body means a flight. smaller wing span, and hence decreased aerodynamic forces. The Campaniform sensillae aerodynamic force generated by a wing may be given by: Dome-shaped mechanosensillae found on the legs and wings of insects (and halteres in flies) that detect strains in the cuticle. 1 2 F ¼ CFðaÞrV S; ð1Þ Clap-and-fling 2 An aerodynamic mechanism in which the two flapping wings dorsally where the aerodynamic force coefficient [CF(α); see Glossary] meet (clap) and come apart (fling),