Hox Gene Ultrabithorax Regulates Distinct Sets of Target Genes at Successive Stages of Drosophila Haltere Morphogenesis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hox Gene Ultrabithorax Regulates Distinct Sets of Target Genes at Successive Stages of Drosophila Haltere Morphogenesis Hox gene Ultrabithorax regulates distinct sets of target genes at successive stages of Drosophila haltere morphogenesis Anastasios Pavlopoulos1 and Michael Akam1 Laboratory for Development and Evolution, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom Edited* by Sean B. Carroll, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, and approved January 7, 2011 (received for review October 7, 2010) Hox genes encode highly conserved transcription factors that expressed in the hind wings of all winged insects studied (10–13), regionalize the animal body axis by controlling complex develop- but it is only in Dipterans that Ubx brings about the striking mental processes. Although they are known to operate in multiple morphological transformation of hind wings into halteres. cell types and at different stages, we are still missing the batte- Compared with the wing blade, the haltere capitellum is reduced ries of genes targeted by any one Hox gene over the course of in size by a fivefold reduction in cell number and an eightfold a single developmental process to achieve a particular cell and reduction in apical cell surface area (14, 15). It forms a balloon organ morphology. The transformation of wings into halteres by shape rather than a flat bilayer because of changes in cell ad- the Hox gene Ultrabithorax (Ubx)inDrosophila melanogaster hesion, it shows no differentiation between vein and intervein presents an excellent model system to study the Hox control of cells, and it lacks marginal bristle rows (15). transcriptional networks during successive stages of appendage The wing epithelium develops in the absence of any Hox input morphogenesis and cell differentiation. We have used an inducible (16) and represents one of the best-studied model systems in misexpression system to switch on Ubx in the wing epithelium at terms of genetic networks underlying pattern formation, growth, — successive stages during metamorphosis in the larva, prepupa, and differentiation. Ubx modifies this wing developmental net- and pupa. We have then used extensive microarray expression pro- work by regulating the expression of target genes to generate filing and quantitative RT-PCR to identify the primary transcrip- fi halteres (17, 18). tional responses to Ubx. We nd that Ubx targets range from Molecular genetic studies have shown that many key patterning regulatory genes like transcription factors and signaling compo- genes in the larval wing primordium are indeed regulated by Ubx, nents to terminal differentiation genes affecting a broad reper- directly or indirectly, in the haltere primordium (14, 17, 19–25). toire of cell behaviors and metabolic reactions. Ubx up- and down- This finding has prompted the use of microarray expression regulates hundreds of downstream genes at each stage, mostly in fi a subtle manner. Strikingly, our analysis reveals that Ubx target pro ling to systematically identify differentially expressed genes genes are largely distinct at different stages of appendage morpho- between wing and haltere imaginal discs (26, 27). These genome- GENETICS genesis, suggesting extensive interactions between Hox genes and wide approaches, however, were not designed to reveal the pri- hormone-controlled regulatory networks to orchestrate complex mary transcriptional responses to Ubx and have uncovered the genetic programs during metamorphosis. cumulative effects from Ubx function throughout development. Moreover, most studies have focused disproportionately on the appendage specialization | homeotic genes | serial homology role of Ubx in appendage patterning and growth in larval stages, whereas the actual transformation in cell and organ morphology tudies of Hox genes first prompted the realization that bila- elicited by Ubx occurs later during metamorphosis (15). Sterians share an extensive genetic makeup for body patterning Elucidation of the architecture of Hox-controlled gene regu- (1) and have since spearheaded the quest for the genetic changes latory networks is fundamental to understanding morphogenesis that drive morphological evolution (2). Hox genes encode and cell differentiation and how these processes underlie di- homeodomain transcription factors that operate in many tissues versification of serially homologous structures like wings and and cell types and modulate a wide range of cell responses by halteres. To identify the genes directly regulated by Ubx to dis- controlling expression of subordinate target genes. Despite their tinguish halteres from wings, we used the TARGET version of the highly conserved roles in body regionalization, only a limited GAL4/UAS system (28) coupled with microarrays to profile number of Hox-controlled morphogenetic and differentiation transcriptional changes in wings shortly after Ubx misexpression programs have been studied in detail. For all of these processes, (unlike previous studies that compared wings with halteres that we do not understand the batteries of genes modulated by Hox express Ubx throughout development). Altering the temperature, proteins to bring about complex developmental transformations. fi The systematic elucidation of Hox targets has been hampered we were able to switch on ectopic Ubx speci cally in developing by the complexity and multiplicity of the regulatory networks that wing blades at levels similar to those observed in normal halteres Hox genes control and the short and degenerate binding sites of and measure the immediate transcriptional responses to Ubx at Hox proteins. It has been further complicated by the functional successive stages during larval, prepupal, and pupal development. redundancy of the Hox proteins and the cross-regulatory inter- actions between them. These factors have made it difficult to elucidate the complete set of target genes modulated by any one Author contributions: A.P. and M.A. designed research; A.P. performed research; A.P. Hox gene over the course of a single developmental process (3– analyzed data; and A.P. and M.A. wrote the paper. 8). Thus, it remains an open question of how these widely con- The authors declare no conflict of interest. served patterning genes link to the actual effectors of cell and *This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor. organ morphology at a genome-wide level over time. Data deposition: The data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Gene Ex- The dorsal flight appendages of Drosophila melanogaster pression Omnibus (GEO) database, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo (accession no. GSE22354). present an excellent system to study Hox-controlled morpho- 1To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] or m.akam@ genesis. Drosophila and flies in general have evolved from four- zoo.cam.ac.uk. winged ancestors by modifying their hind wings into drumstick- This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. like balancing organs called halteres (9). Ultrabithorax (Ubx)is 1073/pnas.1015077108/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1015077108 PNAS | February 15, 2011 | vol. 108 | no. 7 | 2855–2860 Downloaded by guest on October 1, 2021 Results Genetic System for Precisely Controlled Ubx Misexpression in Developing Drosophila Wings. We generated an experimental fly line that produces a complete transformation of the wing blade to haltere capitellum (Fig. 1 A and D). This line combined the nab-Gal4NP3537 driver, a tub-GAL80ts transgene, and a UAS- UbxIa transgene (or a UAS-eGFP control), and it satisfied a number of essential criteria to study Hox gene function on a genome-wide scale. Fig. 2. Effects of Ubx misexpression in the wing epithelium. (A, A′, B, B′, C, With this system, Ubx (or eGFP) was misexpressed specifically and C′) Late pupal phalloidin (F-actin) staining of (A) WT wing, (B) WT hal- in the developing wing blade, a tissue of low complexity composed tere, and (C) experimental wing with a complete homeotic transformation of wing blade into haltere capitellum. High magnification of the same primarily of the vein and intervein cells, the marginal bristle cells, ′ ′ and a few sensilla (Fig. 1 C, F, and G). By measuring gene ex- appendages showing the characteristics of (A ) wing cells, (B ) haltere cells, and (C′) transformed wing cells that have acquired the properties of haltere pression in the fairly homogeneous wing epithelium, we ensured cells. (Scale bar, 25 μm.) the maximum sensitivity to detect transcriptional responses, be- cause each cell type made a relatively big contribution to the total transcript population. our microarray samples 16 h ATS when ectopic Ubx levels in the The experimental line used did not interfere with normal wing wing blade reached about 90% of the levels normally observed in development at 19 °C; a homeotic transformation of wings into the homologous region of the haltere (Fig. 3 F and J). This is halteres was only observed after a temperature shift (ATS) from about 10 h after the first detection of ectopic Ubx protein and 19 °C to 29 °C. The transformation was evident both at the organ about 5 h after ectopic Ubx levels reached 50% of WT haltere (Figs. 1 B and E and 2 A–C) and cell level (Fig. 2 A′–C′). The levels (Fig. 3I). Thus, we presumed that assaying gene expression wing blade turned into a hollow balloon composed of fewer cells 16 h ATS would preferentially identify primary rather than sec- that resembled haltere cells. Normal wing cells are squamous ondary transcriptional responses to Ubx. This assumption was stellate polygons that project one long hair. After misexpressing confirmed by all our subsequent analyses. Ubx, wing cells were transformed into haltere-like cuboidal cells We confirmed by in situ hybridization that ectopic Ubx in the that have a smaller rectangular surface area and produce mul- wing was capable of regulating two enhancers controlling the spalt tiple short hairs. and knot genes targeted by Ubx in WT halteres (19, 21). This We quantified the levels of ectopic Ubx protein in the wing analysis also suggested that samples collected 16 h ATS were epithelium of the experimental line ATS from 19 °C to 29 °C (Fig. appropriate to capture the primary transcriptional responses to – 3 A–J).
Recommended publications
  • Functional Analysis of the Homeobox Gene Tur-2 During Mouse Embryogenesis
    Functional Analysis of The Homeobox Gene Tur-2 During Mouse Embryogenesis Shao Jun Tang A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics University of Toronto March, 1998 Copyright by Shao Jun Tang (1998) National Library Bibriothèque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibiiographic Services seMces bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Weifington OtbawaON K1AW OttawaON KYAON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence alIowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distri%uteor sell reproduire, prêter' distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fkom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Functional Analysis of The Homeobox Gene TLr-2 During Mouse Embryogenesis Doctor of Philosophy (1998) Shao Jun Tang Graduate Department of Moiecular and Medicd Genetics University of Toronto Abstract This thesis describes the clonhg of the TLx-2 homeobox gene, the determination of its developmental expression, the characterization of its fiuiction in mouse mesodem and penpheral nervous system (PNS) developrnent, the regulation of nx-2 expression in the early mouse embryo by BMP signalling, and the modulation of the function of nX-2 protein by the 14-3-3 signalling protein during neural development.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Noncoding Rnas: Functional Surprises from the RNA World
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 25, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW Long noncoding RNAs: functional surprises from the RNA world Jeremy E. Wilusz,1 Hongjae Sunwoo,2 and David L. Spector1,3 1Watson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York 11724, USA; 2Graduate Program in Molecular and Cellular Biology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794 Most of the eukaryotic genome is transcribed, yielding complexity. In addition, there has been an explosion of a complex network of transcripts that includes tens of research addressing possible functional roles for the thousands of long noncoding RNAs with little or no other 98% of the human genome that does not encode protein-coding capacity. Although the vast majority of proteins. Rather unexpectedly, transcription is not lim- long noncoding RNAs have yet to be characterized thor- ited to protein-coding regions, but is instead pervasive oughly, many of these transcripts are unlikely to represent throughout the mammalian genome as demonstrated by transcriptional ‘‘noise’’ as a significant number have been large-scale cDNA cloning projects (Carninci et al. 2005; shown to exhibit cell type-specific expression, localiza- Katayama et al. 2005) and genomic tiling arrays (Bertone tion to subcellular compartments, and association with et al. 2004; Cheng et al. 2005; Birney et al. 2007; Kapranov human diseases. Here, we highlight recent efforts that et al. 2007a). In fact, >90% of the human genome is likely have identified a myriad of molecular functions for long to be transcribed (Birney et al. 2007), yielding a complex noncoding RNAs.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Hox Genes in Regulating Digit Patterning ROCÍO PÉREZ-GÓMEZ, ENDIKA HARO, MARC FERNÁNDEZ-GUERRERO, MARÍA F
    Int. J. Dev. Biol. 62: 797-805 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.180200mr www.intjdevbiol.com Role of Hox genes in regulating digit patterning ROCÍO PÉREZ-GÓMEZ, ENDIKA HARO, MARC FERNÁNDEZ-GUERRERO, MARÍA F. BASTIDA and MARÍA A. ROS* Instituto de Biomedicina y Biotecnología de Cantabria, CSIC–SODERCAN Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain ABSTRACT The distal part of the tetrapod limb, the autopod, is characterized by the presence of digits. The digits display a wide diversity of shapes and number reflecting selection pressure for functional adaptation. Despite extensive study, the different aspects of digit patterning, as well as the factors and mechanisms involved are not completely understood. Here, we review the evidence implicating Hox proteins in digit patterning and the interaction between Hox genes and the Sonic hedgehog/Gli3 pathway, the other major regulator of digit number and identity. Currently, it is well accepted that a self-organizing Turing-type mechanism underlies digit patterning, this being understood as the establishment of an iterative arrangement of digit/interdigit in the hand plate. We also discuss the involvement of 5’ Hox genes in regulating digit spacing in the digital plate and therefore the number of digits formed in this self-organizing system. KEY WORDS: limb development, Hox gene, digit patterning, Shh, Gli3 Introduction and Meyer, 2015). The digits are crucial elements for the function of the limb. They The basic plan of the tetrapod limb includes three distinct can be viewed as serial identical structures arranged along the proximo-distal (PD) segments: the stylopod (arm), the zeugopod antero-posterior (AP) axis of the autopod, thumb to little finger, or (forearm) and the autopod (hand/foot).
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives
    Copyright 0 1994 by the Genetics Society of America Perspectives Anecdotal, Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics Edited by James F. Crow and William F. Dove A Century of Homeosis, A Decade of Homeoboxes William McGinnis Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8114 NE hundred years ago, while the science of genet- ing mammals, and were proposed to encode DNA- 0 ics still existed only in the yellowing reprints of a binding homeodomainsbecause of a faint resemblance recently deceased Moravian abbot, WILLIAMBATESON to mating-type transcriptional regulatory proteins of (1894) coined the term homeosis to define a class of budding yeast and an even fainter resemblance to bac- biological variations in whichone elementof a segmen- terial helix-turn-helix transcriptional regulators. tally repeated array of organismal structures is trans- The initial stream of papers was a prelude to a flood formed toward the identity of another. After the redis- concerning homeobox genes and homeodomain pro- coveryof MENDEL’Sgenetic principles, BATESONand teins, a flood that has channeled into a steady river of others (reviewed in BATESON1909) realized that some homeo-publications, fed by many tributaries. A major examples of homeosis in floral organs and animal skel- reason for the continuing flow of studies is that many etons could be attributed to variation in genes. Soon groups, working on disparate lines of research, have thereafter, as the discipline of Drosophila genetics was found themselves swept up in the currents when they born and was evolving into a formidable intellectual found that their favorite protein contained one of the force enriching many biologicalsubjects, it gradually be- many subtypes of homeodomain.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW Cell and Molecular Biology of Notch
    459 REVIEW Cell and molecular biology of Notch Ulla-Maj Fiu´za and Alfonso Martinez Arias Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK (Correspondence should be addressed to U-M Fiu´za; Email: [email protected]) Abstract Notch signalling is a cell–cell communication process, which complexity which could account for the multitude of roles it has allows the establishment of patterns of gene expression and during development and in adult organisms. In this review, we differentiation, regulates binary cell fate choice and the will describe the multiple roles of Notch and how various factors maintenance of stem cell populations. So far, the data published can regulate Notch signalling. has elucidated the main players in the Notch signalling pathway. Journal of Endocrinology (2007) 194, 459–474 However, its regulatory mechanisms are exhibiting an increasing The structure of Notch and the Notch signalling which allowed the discovery of a core set of molecules involved pathway in Notch signalling and lead to the understanding of how they organize into a signalling pathway. The Notch genes encode members of a family of receptors that In mammals, there are four Notch genes and five genes mediate short-range signalling events. A prototypical Notch encoding ligands, three Delta-like and two Jagged (Fig. 1). In gene encodes a single transmembrane receptor composed in Drosophila, there is only one Notch-encoding gene, one Delta its extracellular region of a conserved array of up to 36 and one Jagged homologue (Serrate; Maine et al. 1995, epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats, involved in Lissemore & Starmer 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Gabriel Dover)
    Dear Mr Darwin (Gabriel Dover) Home | Intro | About | Feedback | Prev | Next | Search Steele: Lamarck's Was Signature Darwin Wrong? Molecular Drive: the Third Force in evolution Geneticist Gabriel Dover claims that there is a third force in evolution: 'Molecular Drive' beside natural selection and neutral drift. Molecular drive is operationally distinct from natural selection and neutral drift. According to Dover it explains biological phenomena, such as the 700 copies of a ribosomal RNA gene and the origin of the 173 legs of the centipede, which natural selection and neutral drift alone cannot explain. by Gert Korthof version 1.3 24 Mar 2001 Were Darwin and Mendel both wrong? Molecular Drive is, according to Dover, an important factor in evolution, because it shapes the genomes and forms of organisms. Therefore Neo-Darwinism is incomplete without Molecular Drive. It is no wonder that the spread of novel genes was ascribed to natural selection, because it was the only known process that could promote the spread of novel genes. Dover doesn't reject the existence of natural selection but points out cases where natural selection clearly fails as a mechanism. Molecular drive is a non-Darwinian mechanism because it is independent of selection. We certainly need forces in evolution, since natural selection itself is not a force. It is the passive outcome of other processes. It is not an active process, notwithstanding its name. Natural selection as an explanation is too powerful for its own good. Molecular drive is non-Mendelian because some DNA segments are multiplied disproportional. In Mendelian genetics genes are present in just two copies (one on the maternal and one on the paternal chromosome).
    [Show full text]
  • Homeobox Gene Expression Profile in Human Hematopoietic Multipotent
    Leukemia (2003) 17, 1157–1163 & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0887-6924/03 $25.00 www.nature.com/leu Homeobox gene expression profile in human hematopoietic multipotent stem cells and T-cell progenitors: implications for human T-cell development T Taghon1, K Thys1, M De Smedt1, F Weerkamp2, FJT Staal2, J Plum1 and G Leclercq1 1Department of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; and 2Department of Immunology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Class I homeobox (HOX) genes comprise a large family of implicated in this transformation proces.14 The HOX-C locus transcription factors that have been implicated in normal and has been primarily implicated in lymphomas.15 malignant hematopoiesis. However, data on their expression or function during T-cell development is limited. Using degener- Hematopoietic cells are derived from stem cells that reside in ated RT-PCR and Affymetrix microarray analysis, we analyzed fetal liver (FL) in the embryo and in the adult bone marrow the expression pattern of this gene family in human multipotent (ABM), which have the unique ability to self-renew and thereby stem cells from fetal liver (FL) and adult bone marrow (ABM), provide a life-long supply of blood cells. T lymphocytes are a and in T-cell progenitors from child thymus. We show that FL specific type of hematopoietic cells that play a major role in the and ABM stem cells are similar in terms of HOX gene immune system. They develop through a well-defined order of expression, but significant differences were observed between differentiation steps in the thymus.16 Several transcription these two cell types and child thymocytes.
    [Show full text]
  • SHOO FLY! Houseflies, Those Pesky Flying Insects That Show up Uninvited
    SHOO FLY! Houseflies, those pesky flying insects that show up uninvited at your summer picnic or slip into your house if you leave a door open too long, are so annoying. Sometimes it seems that they are everywhere! Did you know that there are more than 100,000 different kinds of flies? The housefly is frequently found around humans and on farms and ranches that raise animals. Flies are pests. Not only are they annoying, they also spread diseases to humans. Flies eat rotten things like dead animals, feces (poop), and garbage. As they crawl around on that stuff they pick up germs and spread them wherever they land. Flies are decomposers, living things (such as bacteria, fungus, or insect) that feed on and break down plant and animal matter into simpler parts. Decomposers act as a clean up crew and perform an important job, making sure all of that plant and animal matter doesn’t pile up. Fly Facts: Instead of having a skeleton inside their bodies, flies are hard on the outside and soft on the inside. Their type of skeleton is called an exoskeleton. Flies eat only liquid food. If they land on solid food, they spit on it through their proboscis (part of their mouth). This softens the food so they can eat it. A fly’s tongue is shaped like a straw to sip their food. Since they eat only liquids, flies poop a lot. It is thought that they poop every time they land, so they leave poop everywhere! Flies are very hard to swat because of their excellent eyesight, fast reaction time, and agility (the ability to move quickly and easily).
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquitos Fail at Flight in Heavy Fog 19 November 2012
    Mosquitos fail at flight in heavy fog 19 November 2012 Mosquitos have the remarkable ability to fly in clear These halteres are on a comparable size to the fog skies as well as in rain, shrugging off impacts from droplets and they flap approximately 400 times raindrops more than 50 times their body mass. But each second, striking thousands of drops per just like modern aircraft, mosquitos also are second. Though the halteres can normally repel grounded when the fog thickens. Researchers from water, repeated collisions with 5-micron fog the Georgia Institute of Technology present their particles hinders flight control, leading to flight findings at the 65th meeting of the American failure. Physical Society's (APS) Division of Fluid Dynamics, Nov. 18 - 20, in San Diego, Calif. "Thus the halteres cannot sense their position correctly and malfunction, similarly to how "Raindrop and fog impacts affect mosquitoes quite windshield wipers fail to work well when the rain is differently," said Georgia Tech researcher Andrew very heavy or if there is snow on the windshield," Dickerson. "From a mosquito's perspective, a said Dickerson. "This study shows us that insect falling raindrop is like us being struck by a small flight is similar to human flight in aircraft in that flight car. A fog particle – weighing 20 million times less is not possible when the insects cannot sense their than a mosquito – is like being struck by a crumb. surroundings." For humans, visibility hinders flight; Thus, fog is to a mosquito as rain is to a human." whereas for insects it is their gyroscopic flight sensors." On average during a rainstorm, mosquitos get struck by a drop once every 20 seconds, but fog More information: The talk, "Mosquito Flight particles surround the mosquito continuously as it Failure in Heavy Fog," is at 5 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Development Secondary Article
    Evolution of Development Secondary article Ehab Abouheif, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA Article Contents Gregory A Wray, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA . Introduction . Embryos and Evolution, Heterochrony The field of evolutionary developmental biology provides a framework with which to . Hox Genes elucidate the ‘black box’ that exists between evolution of the genotype and phenotype by . Embryology, Palaeontology, Genes and Limbs focusing the attention of researchers on the way in which genes and developmental processes evolve to give rise to morphological diversity. Introduction and condensation, which deletes earlier ontogenetic stages At the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth to make room for new features (Gould, 1977). century, the fields of evolutionary and developmental As the field of comparative embryology blossomed biology were inseparable. Evolutionary biologists used during the early twentieth century, a considerable body of comparative embryology to reconstruct ancestors and evidence accumulated that was in conflict with the phyletic relationships, and embryologists in turn used predictions of the biogenetic law. Because ontogeny could evolutionary history to explain many of the processes only change by pushing old features backwards in observed during animal development. This close relation- development (condensation) in order to make room for ship ended after the rise of experimental embryology and new features (terminal addition), the timing of develop- Mendelian genetics at the
    [Show full text]
  • Epigenetics of Floral Homeotic Genes in Relation to Sexual Dimorphism in the 2 Dioecious Plant Mercurialis Annua
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/481481; this version posted November 29, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Epigenetics of floral homeotic genes in relation to sexual dimorphism in the 2 dioecious plant Mercurialis annua 3 4 Janardan Khadka1, Narendra Singh Yadav1†, Micha Guy1, Gideon Grafi1* and Avi Golan- 5 Goldhirsh1* 6 1French Associates Institute for Agriculture and Biotechnology of Drylands, Jacob Blaustein 7 Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben Gurion 8 84990, Israel. 9 †Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lethbridge, AB T1K 10 3M4, Canada. 11 * To whom correspondence should be addressed 12 13 14 Highlights 15 Sex determination in Mercurialis annua is not related to epigenetics of floral homeotic genes 16 but appears to be modulated by an unknown gender-specific regulator(s) that affects hormonal 17 homeostasis. 18 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/481481; this version posted November 29, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 19 Abstract 20 In plants, dioecy characterizes species carrying male and female flowers on separate plants 21 and occurs in about 6% of angiosperms. To date, the molecular mechanism(s) underlying 22 sexual dimorphism is essentially unknown. The ability of gender-reversal by hormone 23 application suggests that epigenetics might play an important role in sexual dimorphism.
    [Show full text]
  • Hox Gene Variation and Evolution
    news and views annually degasses about 1 gigatonne (109 not nitrate exhaustion. on the microbial algae. The growth perfor- tonnes) of CO2 (ref. 3), equivalent to 20 per Yet the paradox persists. Virtually all phy- mance of the diatoms is all the more surpris- cent of current anthropogenic output. The toplankton species, including the picoplank- ing as nitrate reduction requires energy regression lines and intercepts of dissolved ton, are able to use nitrate; indeed, phyto- and the mediating enzyme contains iron. inorganic carbon, silicate and nitrate con- plankton other than diatoms routinely Indeed, why diatoms can be so much more centrations, measured in the upper 200 m of exhaust nitrate in the surface waters of the efficient than the other algae despite the the EUZ, indicate that silicate availability non-HNLC ocean. So why does this not hap- nitrate handicap needs to be explained. regulates both carbon and nitrate uptake pen in the EUZ and other low-silicate HNLC Balancing pelagic ecosystem budgets is and fate. The slope of the highly significant regions? Differences in grazing pressure still an art because we know so little about the 5 regression between nitrate and silicate is 1, have been proposed as an explanation . One abilities and predilections of the organisms8 which coincides with the known require- widely held view is that the small algae of the and their interactions with one another5. ment of these two elements by diatoms. The microbial loop are kept in check by heavy Whatever the outcome of studies on the lim- intercept represents the excess nitrate (about grazing pressure, whereas diatoms, because iting factors in the various HNLC regions 4 mmol m–3) that confers HNLC status on of their larger size (and possibly also the pro- and their subsystems, the status of diatoms as the EUZ.
    [Show full text]