July 19 , 2013 New Sales Leader for Air France-KLM-Martinair Cargo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

July 19 , 2013 New Sales Leader for Air France-KLM-Martinair Cargo

July 19th, 2013 New Sales Leader for Air France-KLM-Martinair Cargo Dear customer, It is with mixed feelings that I announce my transfer to another position as per August 1st as Managing Director at Transavia, the Dutch based low-cost airline, operating as an independent part of the Air France-KLM group. It is a great opportunity which I look forward to very much. In the past years being commercially responsible for Air France-KLM-Martinair Cargo, I have been passionate and fully committed to becoming the most preferred carrier. The closeness of co-operating with and for you is the main driver to succeed in this. I am also pleased to share with you that as per the same date, my successor will be Eelco van Asch, who is currently VP Europe for our Cargo business. Eelco has an extensive market knowledge and experience in the air cargo industry and I am fully confident that he will be the right person to ensure continuity in our commercial approach. His commitment to further develop our quality of sales and services and his conviction of the necessity of being close to you, will ensure an always improving set of competitive solutions. As SVP Sales & Distribution, Eelco will also be a member of the Joint Management Board of Air France-KLM-Martinair Cargo. I will personally cherish the great mutual spirit that I have experienced in closely working with you and I trust it will continue to do so in the future with Eelco and his teams. Thank you! Sincerely yours, Mattijs ten Brink Senior Vice-President Sales & Distribution Air France-KLM-Martinair Cargo Appendix: Biography Eelco van Asch Short biography Eelco van Asch Current position : VP Europe, Air France-KLM-Martinair Cargo since 2009 Previous positions • VP Marketing, Communication & E-Commerce Air France-KLM-Martinair Cargo • Director Fresh Logistics KLM Cargo • Director Live Animals KLM cargo • Director Planning & Financial Business Control KLM Cargo Other activities • Member of the supervisory board of Cargonaut BV • Member of the supervisory board of Smartlox BV Born in 1972 in the Netherlands, Eelco van Asch graduated at the University of Amsterdam (Master in Business Administration) and is a certified management accountant. In 2000, he started his career in KLM Cargo. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Smart and Sustainable Action Plan for Air Transport in the Netherlands: 35% Less CO2 by 2030
Smart and Sustainable Action Plan for Air Transport in the Netherlands: 35% less CO2 by 2030 Jointly drafted by the following organisations: Royal Schiphol Group Board of Airline Representatives in the Netherlands D. Benschop F.T.J.M. Allard KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Air Cargo Nederland P.J.Th. Elbers M. van As Netherlands Aerospace Centre Air Traffic Control the Netherlands M. Peters M. van Dorst Rotterdam The Hague Airport Delft University of Technology R. Louwerse H. Werij Eindhoven Airport NS Dutch Railways J.Meijs R. van Boxtel Lelystad Airport LRN / Netherlands Aviation and Aerospace Foundation H. Buis A. Veenman Transavia SkyNRG M. ten Brink M. van Dijk Easyjet VNO-NCW Confederation of Netherlands Industry and Employers W. Vet H. de Boer TUI Evofenedex European Shippers’ Council E. Bruyninckx M. van der Kuijl Corendon Dutch Aviation Group S.M. van der Heijden A. Schnitger 3 Air Transport Netherlands - smart and sustainable Air Transport Netherlands - smart and sustainable Contents Introduction page 6 Theme 1: Optimising flight paths & procedures page 9 Theme 2: Incentivising investment in cleaner aircraft by way of airport charges page 11 Theme 3: Greater utilisation of sustainable fuel page 13 Theme 4: Radical fleet renewal page 15 Theme 5: Use of railways and other sustainable modes of transport for shorter trips page 17 Theme 6: Working towards zero emission airports page 19 Theme 7: A swift, efficient and sustainable “first & last mile” page 21 Conclusion page 22 5 Air Transport Netherlands - smart and sustainable Introduction There is a shared ambition among leading air transport businesses and - Carbon Offsetting and Reduction knowledge centres in the Netherlands to become the smartest and most Scheme for Aviation (CORSIA): sustainable players in the global air transport sector.
[Show full text]
Tenth Session of the Statistics Division
STA/10-WP/6 International Civil Aviation Organization 2/10/09 WORKING PAPER TENTH SESSION OF THE STATISTICS DIVISION Montréal, 23 to 27 November 2009 Agenda Item 1: Civil aviation statistics — ICAO classification and definition REVIEW OF DEFINITIONS OF DOMESTIC AND CABOTAGE AIR SERVICES (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY Currently, ICAO uses two different definitions to identify the traffic of domestic flight sectors of international flights; one used by the Statistics Programme, based on the nature of a flight stage, and the other, used for the economic studies on air transport, based on the origin and final destination of a flight (with one or more flight stages). Both definitions have their shortcomings and may affect traffic forecasts produced by ICAO for domestic operations. A similar situation arises with the current inclusion of cabotage services under international operations. After reviewing these issues, the Fourteenth Meeting of the Statistics Panel (STAP/14) agreed to recommend that no changes be made to the current definitions and instructions. Action by the division is in paragraph 5. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 In its activities in the field of air transport economics and statistics, ICAO is currently using two different definitions to identify the domestic services of an air carrier. The first one used by the Statistics Programme has been reaffirmed and clarified during Ninth Meeting of the Statistics Division (STA/9) and it is the one currently shown in the Air Transport Reporting Forms. The second one is being used by the Secretariat in the studies on international airline operating economics which have been carried out since 1976 and in pursuance of Assembly Resolution A36-15, Appendix G (reproduced in Appendix A).
[Show full text]
Milan Linate (LIN) J Ownership and Organisational Structure the Airport
Competition between Airports and the Application of Sfare Aid Rules Volume H ~ Country Reports Italy Milan Linate (LIN) J Ownership and organisational structure The airport is part of Gruppo SEA (Milan Airports). Ownership is 14.6% local government and 84.6% City of Milan. Other shareholders hold the remaining 0.8%. Privatisation (partial) was scheduled for the end of 2001 but was stopped after the events of 11th September. Now the proposed date is October 2002 but this has still to be finalised. Only 30% of the shareholding will be moved into the private sector with no shareholder having more than 5%. There are no legislative changes required. The provision of airport services is shared between ENAV (ATC), Italian police (police), SEA (security), ATA and SEA Handling (passenger and ramp handling), Dufntal (duty-free) and SEA Parking (car parking). There are no current environmental issues but, in the future, there is a possible night ban and charges imposed according to aircraft noise. 2 Type ofairpo Milan Linate is a city-centre (almost) airport that serves mainly the scheduled domestic and international market with a growing low-cost airline presence (Buzz, Go). There is very little charter and cargo traffic but some General Aviation. The airport is subject to traffic distribution rules imposed by the Italian government with the aim of 'encouraging' airlines to move to Malpensa. Traffic Data (2000) Domestic fíghts Scheduled Charter Total Terminal Passengers (arrivals) 2 103 341 _ 2 103 341 Terminal Passengers (departures) 2 084 008
[Show full text]
Airports Council International
AIRPORTS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTS COUNCIL INTERNATIONAL Celebrating 20 Years – 1991-2011 CELEBRATING 20 YEARS – 1991-2011 20YEARS Airports Council International 1991-2011 CAH-420x210.pdf 1 2011-5-24 16:28:50 C M Y CM MY CY CMY K RZ_1_inserat_1.indd 1 25.05.11 11:22 20YEARS Airports Council International 1991-2011 Airports Council International CELEBRATING 20 YEARS – 1991-2011 Published by International Systems and Communications Limited (ISC) in conjunction with Airports Council International (ACI). Copyright © 2011. The entire content of this publication is protected by copyright, full details of which are available from the publisher. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in retrieval systems or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISC ACI World Park Place 800 rue du Square Victoria 12 Lawn Lane Suite 1810, PO Box 302 London SW8 1UD Montreal England Quebec H4Z 1G8 Canada Telephone: + 44 20 7091 1188 Facsimile: + 44 20 7091 1198 Telephone: +1 514 373 1200 E-mail: [email protected] Facsimile: +1 514 373 1201 Website: www.isyscom.com E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.aci.aero RZ_1_inserat_1.indd 1 25.05.11 11:22 78654•SNC-AP-Airport:Ap-Airport-V2 2/05/11 18:26 Page 1 Contents ACI: Mission, Objectives, Structure 6 ACI Africa 145 Message from the Chair of the ACI World ACI Africa Intensifies its Efforts 148 Governing Board 8 By Monhla Hlahla By Max Moore-Wilton Cairo Redevelops
[Show full text]
Air Transport Industry
ANALYSIS OF THE EU AIR TRANSPORT INDUSTRY Final Report 2004 Contract no: TREN/05/MD/S07.52077 By Cranfield University CONTENTS GLOSSARY...........................................................................................................................................................6 1. AIR TRANSPORT INDUSTRY OVERVIEW ..................................................................................12 2. REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS .................................................................................................18 3. CAPACITY ...........................................................................................................................................24 4. AIR TRAFFIC ......................................................................................................................................36 5. AIRLINE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE .......................................................................................54 6. AIRPORTS............................................................................................................................................86 7. AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ...............................................................................................................104 8. THE ENVIRONMENT......................................................................................................................114 9. CONSUMER ISSUES ........................................................................................................................118 10 AIRLINE ALLIANCES.....................................................................................................................126
[Show full text]
Air Transport: Annual Report 2005
ANALYSIS OF THE EU AIR TRANSPORT INDUSTRY Final Report 2005 Contract no: TREN/05/MD/S07.52077 by Cranfield University Department of Air Transport Analysis of the EU Air Transport Industry, 2005 1 CONTENTS 1 AIR TRANSPORT INDUSTRY OVERVIEW......................................................................................11 2 REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS.....................................................................................................19 3 CAPACITY ............................................................................................................................................25 4. AIR TRAFFIC........................................................................................................................................36 5. AIRLINE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE............................................................................................54 6. AIRPORTS.............................................................................................................................................85 7 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ..................................................................................................................102 8. THE ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................................................110 9 CONSUMER ISSUES..........................................................................................................................117 10 AIRLINE ALLIANCES .......................................................................................................................124
[Show full text]
Low Cost Monitor 1/2014
Translation DE -> EN Low Cost Monitor 1/2014 - A DLR-Analysis - 466 Routes LCC-Routes The current Low Cost Carrier Market in Germany Spring 2014 Current Low Cost Carrier Market in Germany in 2013/2014 The Low Cost Carrier (LCC) market has been an inherent part of the German air transport market. The Low Cost Monitor published by DLR informs twice a year on key features of low cost carrier traffic and current developments in this market segment. These are in particular the number and relative importance of low cost carriers and their supply, including air fares, and passenger demand for low cost transport services. The description of the low cost supply in the current monitor is based on a reference week in the winter timetable 2014. Passenger data refer to the year 2013. Airlines Airlines involved in the low cost business design their offer quite differently. Due to this inhomogeneity only a few distinctive criteria can be defined for the low cost market segment, such as low fares, their general availability and direct sale via the internet. Thus, in some cases, a certain scope of discretion arises when allocating an airline to the LCC segment. Furthermore, amalgamations of business models are seen in several airlines that further complicate the accurate assignment to the low cost market segment. For this issue of the Monitor the authors classify currently a number of 19 airlines (among all airlines operating on German airports) that offer entirely or predominantly low cost offers. These are in detail (s. also Tab. 1): Aer Lingus (EI)
[Show full text]
Article Title
International In-house Counsel Journal Vol. 6, No. 21, Autumn 2012, 1 In-house v. Outside Counsel: Best of both worlds LISETTE LEUFTINK Corporate Legal Counsel, Transavia Airlines C.V., Netherlands Gone are the days when in-house counsels send out all relevant cases to just one outside counsel, with whom it had a good and solid relationship built over years and years of cooperation. These days, in-house counsels have become more efficient and systematic when it comes to hiring outside counsels. ‘All bills will be paid without hesitation’ isn’t standard practice anymore. On the contrary, the costs for the services rendered have become one of the criteria for selecting outside counsels. Times have changed and so has the role of both the in-house counsel and the outside counsel. After years of experience as an outside counsel at a law firm in Amsterdam, with a specialization in corporate and insolvency law, I changed jobs and joined Transavia Airlines1 (“Transavia”) at Schiphol Airport as corporate legal counsel. Even though the basis of both jobs consists of being a legal consultant for a company, the role of an in- house counsel is very different from the role of an outside counsel. In this paper I will set out how I experienced these differences and in general the recent developments in both roles. And what are the consequences for the cooperation between the outside and in- house counsels and their teams? Furthermore I will discuss a recent development in EU legislation on air passenger rights, how this affects the EU aviation industry and why in this case a solid cooperation with an outstanding outside counsel is of paramount value.
[Show full text]
Order 7340.1Z, Contractions
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 7340.1Z CHG 2 SUBJ: CONTRACTIONS 1. PURPOSE. This change transmits revised pages to change 2 of Order 7340.1Z, Contractions. 2. DISTRIBUTION. This change is distributed to select offices in Washington and regional headquarters, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, and the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center; all air traffic field offices and field facilities; all airway facilities field offices; all international aviation field offices, airport district offices, and flight standards district offices; and the interested aviation public. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. October 25, 2007. 4. EXPLANATION OF CHANGES. Cancellations, additions, and modifications are listed in the CAM section of this change. Changes within sections are indicated by a vertical bar. 5. DISPOSITION OF TRANSMITTAL. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 6. PAGE CONTROL CHART. See the Page Control Chart attachment. Michael A. Cirillo Vice President, System Operations Services Air Traffic Organization Date: __________________ Distribution: ZAT-734, ZAT-464 Initiated by: AJR-0 Vice President, System Operations Services 10/25/07 7340.1Z CHG 2 PAGE CONTROL CHART REMOVE PAGES DATED INSERT PAGES DATED CAM-1-1 and CAM-1-10 07/05/07 CAM-1-1 and CAM-1-10 10/25/07 1-1-1 03/15/07 1-1-1 10/25/07 3-1-11 03/15/07 3-1-11 03/15/07 3-1-12 03/15/07 3-1-12 10/25/07 3-1-23 03/15/07 3-1-23 03/15/07 3-1-24 03/15/07 3-1-24 10/25/07 3-1-31 03/15/07 3-1-31 03/15/07 3-1-32 through 3-1-34 03/15/07 3-1-32 through
[Show full text]
Monthly OTP January 2019
Monthly OTP January 2019 ON-TIME PERFORMANCE AIRLINES Contents On-Time is percentage of flights that depart or arrive within 15 minutes of schedule. Global OTP rankings are only assigned to all Airlines/Airports where OAG has status coverage for at least 80% of the scheduled flights. Regional Airlines Status coverage will only be based on actual gate times rather than estimated times. This may result in some airlines / airports being excluded from this report. If you would like to review your flight status feed with OAG pleas [email protected] MAKE SMARTER MOVES Airline Monthly OTP – January 2019 Page 1 of 1 Home GLOBAL AIRLINES – TOP 50 AND BOTTOM 50 TOP AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance BOTTOM AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size FA Safair 94.5% 1 2,028 176 3H Air Inuit 33.2% 153 1,488 205 7G Star Flyer 94.5% 2 2,046 174 VC ViaAir 43.0% 152 155 321 NT Binter Canarias 92.8% 3 4,990 105 WG Sunwing Airlines Inc. 43.3% 151 2,876 141 GA Garuda Indonesia 92.0% 4 15,226 41 5J Cebu Pacific Air 45.7% 150 9,305 71 BC Skymark Airlines 91.7% 5 4,614 111 AI Air India 50.2% 149 17,165 34 CM Copa Airlines 91.5% 6 11,123 55 RS Air Seoul, Inc 52.9% 148 1,092 226 JH Fuji Dream Airlines 90.7% 7 2,170 169 WO Swoop 53.1% 147 742 253 B7 Uni Airways 90.6% 8 4,108 120 4N Air North 54.4% 146 416 279 IB Iberia 90.0% 9 16,745 36 Z2 Philippines AirAsia Inc.
[Show full text]
Airline Bankruptcy: the Post-Deregulation Epidemic
Airline Bankruptcy: The Post-Deregulation Epidemic By Paul Stephen Dempsey McGill University Institute of Air & Space Law Copyright © 2012 by the author • “Airline deregulation is a bankrupt policy.” Hobart Rowen Washington Post columnist Every major US interstate airline at the time of deregulation in 1978 has since visited bankruptcy court, several more than once. 15 US AIRLINE INDUSTRY NET PROFIT MARGINS 1950-2009 10 5 0 -5 -10 net profit margins net -15 -20 year • 2000 – U.S. profit $2.5 billion • 2001 - U.S. loses $8.3 billion • 2002 - U.S. loses $11.4 billion • 2003 - U.S. loses $1.7 billion • 2004 - U.S. loses $9.1billion • 2005 - U.S. loses $27.2 billion • 2006 - U.S. profit $18.2 billion • 2007 - U.S. profit $7.7 billion • 2008 - U.S. loses $23.8 billion • 2009 - U.S. loses $2.5 billion • 2010 – U.S. profit $3.6 billion US Carriers cumulatively lost $52 billion in this decade. U.S. General Accountability Office • “Structurally, the airline industry is characterized by high fixed costs, cyclical demand for its services, intense competition, and vulnerability to external shocks. As a result, airlines have been more prone to failure than many other businesses, and the sector’s financial performance has continually been very weak . • “Since the 1978 economic deregulation of the U.S. airline industry, airline bankruptcy filings have become prevalent in the United States, and airlines fail at a higher rate than companies in most other industries.” • U.S. Government Accountability Office, Commercial Aviation: Bankruptcy and Pension Problems are Symptoms of Underlying Structural Issues (Sep.
[Show full text]
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
Customer Success Story: KLM Royal Dutch Airlines Business |CustomerServiceEnhancement Language Training Supports Employee Development Challenge KLM Royal Dutch Airlines is a worldwide airline company based in the Netherlands. It comprises the core of the KLM Group, which further includes KLM Cityhopper, transavia.com, and Martinair. KLM works very closely with Air France within the AIR FRANCE KLM Group, which exists since the two companies merged in 2004. The AIR FRANCE KLM Group is Europe’s leading group in the airline business. KLM provides customers with innovative products and safe, efficient, and service-oriented operations. It pays specific attention to staff flexibility, mobility, participation, and health. The company, which together with its partners flies to more than 250 destinations, encourages employees to expand their skills and “The attraction of Rosetta Stone knowledge through training. Such flexibility demands adaptable and for many is that we are not accessible training systems that integrate with travel between time zones. limiting our crew to those languages. Some are learning Solution KLM Inflight Services ran a pilot with Rosetta Stone® Language Lessons Chinese, Hebrew, and Swedish Version 3 for Business (formerly Rosetta Stone® Enterprise) and other – they may simply enjoy flying to language-learning providers, having established that face-to-face these places and love being able lessons were not a good fit with employees’ timetables. to speak the language once they Jozien ten Zijthoff, Foreign Language Coordinator for Cabin Crew get there.” Management at KLM Inflight Services, said: “Around 80 per cent of our passengers are not Dutch and that’s why languages are so important to our company.
[Show full text]