DOCSLIB.ORG

Geosteering Improves Bakken Results

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geosteering Improves Bakken Results JANUARY 2012 The “Better Business” Publication Serving the Exploration / Drilling / Production Industry Geosteering Improves Bakken Results By Kevin O’Connell, NPE is drilling and developing two blocks, in Divide, Williams and McKenzie coun- David Skari, aggregating approximately 50,000 net acres ties. Wells are being drilled to target zones Aaron J. Wheeler in the heart of the Bakken Shale in Divide, located between 9,000 and 11,000 feet and Allan Rennie Williams, Dunn and McKenzie counties, true vertical depth. The horizontal pro- N.D. (Figure 1). Led by a highly experienced, ducing sections of the wells average 8,000 DENVER–Developing tight oil and technologically focused management team, feet of lateral, which is cased, perforated gas-bearing formations often requires a the company prides itself on customizing its and fractured in multiple stages. The two dense pattern of wells with long lateral drilling and completion methods to the primary intervals targeted within the oil sections. To produce such fields econom- unique geological and geophysical charac- reservoir are a clean dolomite member of ically, producing sections of wells must teristics of its core project blocks. the Three Forks formation and a 15-foot be positioned accurately within the targeted zone below a tight limestone within the Drilling History intervals, while drilling costs are kept to Bakken Middle Member. a minimum. Since early in 2010, Ensign Rigs Nos. Initially, the horizontal production wells A cost-effective solution has been de- 89 and 118 have been working for NPE required drilling a vertical pilot hole that veloped that includes predrill modeling was sidetracked, deviated from vertical of logging-while-drilling measurements FIGURE 1 to build the curve, then drilled laterally along the trajectory of a planned well to North Plains Energy LLC Area of within the producing zone. Wireline logs compare with real-time LWD data. This Operations in North Dakota and cores were run in the initial pilot provides the ability to support geosteering hole to determine the landing point for to and within the target formation. This the sidetrack and to evaluate the optimal geosteering technique has been utilized interval within the reservoir to target. to develop Bakken Shale oil assets. The There was limited regional structural wells have been navigated to land consis- control in planning the laterals. The initial tently in the reservoir, and have successfully well required a sidetrack because it inad- maintained position within the primary vertently drilled into the Upper Bakken target zone for more than 90 percent of Shale. NPE decided that a single geosteered the lateral sections. well trajectory would be more cost effec- North Plains Energy LLC (NPE) is a tive, and the resulting smoother well Denver-based company focused on ac- profile should reduce the risk of losing quiring, developing and enhancing oil the bottomhole assembly. It also would and gas assets within the continental make the completion less problematic. In United States. NPE operates acreage in addition, using LWD tools in the region part of the Williston Basin on the west would provide valuable experience and flank of the Nesson Anticline. A 2008 knowledge about the subsurface geology U.S. Geological Survey assessment of the of the target formations while drilling. undiscovered resources in the Upper De- vonian-Lower Mississippian Bakken for- Geosteering Partnership mation of the Williston Basin Province in Prior to geological steering methods, Montana and North Dakota estimated the success of a directional drilling oper- mean undiscovered volumes of 3.65 billion ation depended largely on steering the barrels of oil, 1.85 trillion cubic feet of well through a target reservoir with an associated natural gas, and 148 million assumed position fixed in geometric space. barrels of natural gas liquids. However, a success in geometric terms Reproduced for Schlumberger with permission from The American Oil & Gas Reporter www.aogr.com Oil & Gas Shales could be a failure in economic terms if were utilized to calculate the expected urements. Because these measurements the assumed and actual geometric locations LWD response of formations into which were similar to wireline resistivity meas - of the reservoir differed. horizontal wells were to be drilled. LWD urements, the LWD logs were correlated Effective well placement in horizontal data types typically modeled included with similar wireline logs to locate im - drilling requires that geological changes gamma ray, resistivity, density-neutron portant geological features. Because the be detected quickly, and that the well (imaging), and sonic measurements. wave propagation measurements were plan be adjusted in a timely fashion. With The objective of geological steering well characterized, the LWD log response this challenge in mind, a dependable ge - depends on the section of the well. In the was predictable under most conditions ological steering partnership was developed build section, where the deviation increases observed. between NPE and PathFinder, a Schlum - from the kickoff point until the well enters The LWD resistivity tools have multiple berger company, for providing directional the reservoir, the goal is to steer the well transmitter-receiver spacings and multiple drilling and MWD/LWD services, sup - so that it enters the reservoir at a desired frequencies. The resistivity measurement ported by the company’s PayZone Steer - inclination and direction. In the lateral from each spacing and frequency responds ing™ services at the well site. The real- section, the goal is to position the well’s differently to a resistivity interface located time forward modeling software assists path to optimize well bore exposure to away from the well bore. Since the nature in geologically steering deviated well tra - the reservoir. of the resistivity interface is known from jectories by combining petrophysical data These goals have been achieved con - the offset well logs, multiple resistivities from LWD logs run in offset wells, the sistently through interpreting real-time can be leveraged to obtain a profile to geological earth model, and the directional LWD measurements, gamma ray in the help maintain the well’s position within well plan to create a model of the forma - build section, and gamma ray combined the target interval at a distance from the tions being drilled. with resistivity in the lateral section. These interface. During the early stages of the project, LWD measurements were selected by During drilling, an experienced service company staff, working in close evaluating the log response characteristics geosteering field engineer compared the consultation with the operator’s technical within and adjacent to selected target measured LWD responses with the mod - team, focused on learning the geologic zones of the Bakken Middle Member and eled synthetic responses to determine the setting in the area. Effective communica - Three Forks formations. position of the well’s path within the ge - tions among the team allowed it to as - ological sequence. The engineer also ref - semble local earth models based on avail - LWD Resistivity erenced all other relevant information, able seismic data, structural information, Electromagnetic wave propagation re - such as cuttings sample observations from and information from selected offset wells. sistivity tools delivered the standard deep- the mud logging geologist, to support the geosteering interpretation. Wireline and LWD data from offset wells sensing LWD array wave resistivity meas - The resulting geologic interpretation, which incorporated observed differences FIGURE 2 between expected and measured LWD Prewell Model of the Projected Landing Point (Holland No. 9-19H) responses, combined with additional drilling-related data, was communicated GAPI CHMM CHMM 1,000 RT_RHTE to NPE to allow the drilling and geology RSPH_M 9,690 RMPH_M team to make time-critical decisions effi - 100 RDPH_M y t i v RDAL_M i t ciently about adhering to or modifying s i s e R d 10 e the well plan. l Upper Bakken e d o M The team was able to adjust the drilling 1 Modeled Resistivity Response 9,720 plan as the horizontal well was drilled, GAPI ORR_S using actual well bore trajectory data and 120 LWD logging measurements. In consul - P O tation with NPE, the team incorporated R / y a 80 R 9,750 a interpretations to reconcile the local geo - m m a G logic model with real-time data, allowing D V 40 R Modeled Gamma Ray Response the well bore position to be maintained 0 within the target zone. feet 9,690 9,780 Lower Bakken Refining Results 9,720 Planned Well Trajectory Real-time LWD data acquired from 9,750 Projected landing point within the zone of interest not only were D V T at 9,806 feet TVD based 9,810 correlated with the synthetic model, but on initial geologic model 9,780 Three Forks target interval also were back-correlated with previous identified by red lines and well plan measured data from the same well as the 9,810 trajectory moved upstructure or down - structure within the target formation. All feet 0 40 80 120 1 10 100 1,000 9,760 9,840 9,920 10,000 10,080 Gamma Ray Resistivity decisions regarding changes to the well Oil & Gas Shales FIGURE 3 trajectory considered BHA capabilities, Geologic Interpretation Displaying the Well Bore Position the original directional well plan, and Within the Three Forks Formation Target Interval completion requirements in consultation with NPE. Continuous control of the well API OHMM OHMM 1,000 RT_RHTE bore trajectory delivered reduced tortuosity Vertical Depth Correlation RSPH_A y t i v i t 1s 00 and dogleg severity, leading to quicker i RMPH_A s e R RDPH_A e m well bore completion and production. i 10 RDAL_A 9,740 T - l a e Upper Bakken R LWD data and forward modeling in - 1 Real-Time Resistivity Measurements terpretation results were delivered at the OHMM 1,000 Modeled Resistivity Response RT_RHTE well site and remotely, using secure Web- RSPH_M y t i 1v 00 i RMPH_M t based applications.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Context of Public Acceptance of Hydraulic Fracturing: Is Louisiana
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2012 The context of public acceptance of hydraulic fracturing: is Louisiana unique? Crawford White Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation White, Crawford, "The onc text of public acceptance of hydraulic fracturing: is Louisiana unique?" (2012). LSU Master's Theses. 3956. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/3956 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CONTEXT OF PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE OF HYDRAULIC FRACTURING: IS LOUISIANA UNIQUE? A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Environmental Sciences by Crawford White B.S. Georgia Southern University, 2010 August 2012 Dedication This thesis is dedicated to the memory of three of the most important people in my life, all of whom passed on during my time here. Arthur Earl White 4.05.1919 – 5.28.2011 Berniece Baker White 4.19.1920 – 4.23.2011 and Richard Edward McClary 4.29.1982 – 9.13.2010 ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my committee first of all: Dr. Margaret Reams, my advisor, for her unending and enthusiastic support for this project; Professor Mike Wascom, for his wit and legal expertise in hunting down various laws and regulations; and Maud Walsh for the perspective and clarity she brought this project.
    [Show full text]
  • GW-MLE Mud Logging Equipment
    GW-MLE Mud Logging Equipment Science & Technology Management Department, CNPC 2015 CHINA NATIONAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION GW-MLE Mud Logging Equipment: “Penetrating Eyesight” of Petroleum Drilling! Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Characteristic Technologies 6 3 Typical Cases 15 4 Scientific Research Equipment 18 5 Qualification Standards 20 6 Expert Team 22 China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) CNPC was ranked 3th among the world’s largest is a state-authorized investment agency and a 50 oil companies and 4th in Fortune Global 500 in state holding company. On July 1998, with the 2014. implementation of the Institutional reform of the CNPC strictly follows by the combined strategies State Council, CNPC was reorgnized to become of increasing resource capacity, expanding market an integrated oil company of cross-regions, cross- shares and consolidating the international role, and industries and cross-countries, it adopts modern persists in regarding technical innovation as a key enterprise system to realize the integrations of framework to advance technological progress. To upstream and downstream operations, internal and develop its core businesses, focuses will be placed external trade, production and marketing. CNPC’s on the solutions of key bottleneck technologies business covers six main sectors: oil and gas and key proprietary technologies. Thanks to operations, petroleum engineering service, petroleum continuously improving of the technical innovation engineering construction, petroleum equipment system, optimizing the configuration of technological manufacturing, financial services and new energy resources and strengthening the construction of development. In 2014 CNPC produced 113.67 million strong talent teams, CNPC’s technological creativity tons of crude oil and 95.46 billion cubic meters of has been considerably upgraded.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Understanding of Resource Recovery and Environmental Impacts Via Field Laboratories
    Advancing Understanding of Resource Recovery and Environmental Impacts via Field Laboratories Jared Ciferno – Oil and Gas Technology Manager, NETL Upstream Workshop Houston, TX February 14, 2018 The National Laboratory System Idaho National Lab National Energy Technology Laboratory Pacific Northwest Ames Lab Argonne National Lab National Lab Fermilab Brookhaven National Lab Berkeley Lab Princeton Plasma Physics Lab SLAC National Accelerator Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Lawrence Livermore National Lab Oak Ridge National Lab Sandia National Lab Savannah River National Lab Office of Science National Nuclear Security Administration Environmental Management Fossil Energy Nuclear Energy National Renewable Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Los Alamos Energy Lab National Lab 2 Why Field Laboratories? • Demonstrate and test new technologies in the field in a scientifically objective manner • Gather and publish comprehensive, integrated well site data sets that can be shared by researchers across technology categories (drilling and completion, production, environmental) and stakeholder groups (producers, service companies, academia, regulators) • Catalyze industry/academic research collaboration and facilitate data sharing for mutual benefit 3 Past DOE Field Laboratories Piceance Basin • Multi-well Experiment (MWX) and M-Site project sites in the Piceance Basin where tight gas sand research was done by DOE and GRI in the 1980s • Data and analysis provided an extraordinary view of reservoir complexities and “… played a significant role
    [Show full text]
  • Approach Optimizes Well Geosteering
    SEPTEMBER 2018 The “Better Business” Publication Serving the Exploration / Drilling / Production Industry Approach Optimizes Well Geosteering By Christopher Viens When a change in total gamma is not based 3-D geosteering solution rather and Mark Tomlinson associated with an up or down movement than conventional 2-D geosteering soft- through stratigraphy, it indicates faulting, ware. By integrating multiple well and HOUSTON–Geosteering in horizontal a depositional anomaly, heterogeneity, or seismic surface inputs, this approach wells involves correlating logging data bedding that is not laterally continuous gives the geosteering geologist the infor- to a type log from a nearby offset well to or stratified. Because the fundamental mation to confidently resolve abrupt bed characterize the zone of interest. Corre- basis of geosteering is correlating to dip changes, identify faults, identify areas lating against a type log requires the bed- marker beds that have lateral continuity, of lateral continuity/discontinuity, identify ding thickness and gamma character of in situations where lateral continuity is stratified/unstratified zones and understand the target well to be close to that of the absent, only a low level of interpretation formation-related directional drilling tra- type log, which can be offset by miles in confidence can be achieved using tradi- jectory phenomena, etc. some cases. If not, the resulting geosteering tional correlation methods. interpretation will have unreasonable bed To maximize the benefits of azimuthal Laterally Continuous Bedding dips that do not accurately reflect the gamma imaging, a protocol has been de- In areas with laterally continuous target lithology being drilled, leaving the veloped to identify and handle challenging strata, the gamma character in the type geosteering geologist running multiple geosteering situations using a model- well typically will be present at the simultaneous interpretations in the hope that one will start to make sense as new data come in during drilling.
    [Show full text]
  • Value Creation with Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Geosteering Operations
    International Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2016, 3, 15-31 15 Value Creation with Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Geosteering Operations K. Kullawan1,*, R. B. Bratvold1 and J. E. Bickel2 1University of Stavanger, Department of Petroleum Engineering, 4036 Stavanger Norway 2Graduate Program in Operations Research, 1 University Station, C2200, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78712-0292, USA Abstract: Due to escalated drilling costs, the petroleum industry has been attempting to access the largest possible hydrocarbon resources with the lowest achievable costs. Multiple well objectives are set prior to the start of drilling. Then, a geosteering approach is implemented to help operators achieve these objectives. A comprehensive literature survey has been performed on geosteering case histories, including many cases with multiple objectives. We found that the listed objectives are often conflicting and expressed in different measures. Furthermore, none of the cases from the reviewed literature has discussed a systematic approach for dealing with multiple objectives in geosteering contexts. Without implementing a well-structured approach, decision makers are likely to make judgments about the relative importance of each objective based on previous experiences or on approximate methods. Research shows that such decision-making approaches are unlikely to identify optimal courses of action. In this paper, we propose a systematic method for making multi-criteria decisions in geosteering context. The method is constructed such that it is applicable for real-time operations. Results show that different decision criteria can have significant impact on well success as measured by its trajectory, future production, cost, and operational efficiency. Keywords: Geosteering, real-time well placement, geosteering decision, multi-objective decision, decision making.
    [Show full text]
  • 2767738 Automation Provides Unique Insights of the Rock Record And
    ID: - 2767738 Automation Provides Unique Insights of The Rock Record and Subsurface Through the Delivery of a Robotic Sample Collection and Analysis Device David Tonner, Diversified Well Logging, Houston TX, USA, Aaron Swanson, Diversified Well Logging, Houston TX, USA, Ron Hollingshead, Diversified Well Logging Houston TX, USA, Simon Hughes, Diversified Well Logging Houston TX, USA , Stephen Seacrest, PetroLegacy Energy Austin TX, USA, Bret McDaniel PetroLegacy Energy Austin TX, USA ABSTRACT Abstract Objectives/Scope: From the very early days of oil and gas exploration, appraisal and development drilling, samples have been collected at the rig by mud logging personnel to conduct a preliminary geological analysis of the rock being drilled. This collection typically involves a sample collection recipient, board or bucket to collect a sample of rock over the desired interval. The sample is then sieved and cleaned in the appropriate way depending on the type of drilling fluid being used. As penetration rates have increased in some instances to more than 400 ft. / hr. the sample resolution has deteriorated exponentially. From an ergonomics perspective, the highest frequency to which a person onsite can collect a sample is once every 20 minutes. At 300 ft. / hr. this translates to 100 ft. of drilled rock. A new device has been developed and deployed which automates this manual process and thus ensures faster and more accurate collection of geological samples of the drilled rock interval. Sample resolutions of 5ft rock intervals have been attained at 400 ft./ hr. This technology has provided an important technological breakthrough and enables reduction of personnel at the rig site with a subsequent reduction in cost and HSE risk, particularly in areas of H2S.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Practice of Formation Evaluation Program in Geothermal Drilling
    PROCEEDINGS, 46th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California, February 15-17, 2021 SGP-TR-218 Common Practice of Formation Evaluation Program in Geothermal Drilling Vicky R. Chandra1, Ribka F. Asokawati2, Dorman P. Purba3 1PT Geo Dipa Energi, Jl. Warung Buncit Raya No.75, Jakarta, Indonesia 2PT Rigsis Energi Indonesia, Equity Tower, 49th Floor, Jl. Jend. Sudirman, Jakarta, Indonesia 3PT Enerka Bhumi Pratama, Kawasan Komersial Cilandak Gudang 410, Jakarta Selatan 12560, Indonesia [email protected] Keywords: technique, petrography, xrd, methylene blue, formation evaluation, cutting, coring, pressure, temperature, spinner, rock pH, borehole image, drilling, mudlogging, geothermal ABSTRACT Formation evaluation program in drilling operation, particularly geothermal drilling, is very much determined by the purpose and objective of drilling itself. During early exploration phase, the formation evaluation program is carried out by collecting as much subsurface information as possible. This was applied because of available subsurface data to support the development geothermal project are very limited. On the other hand, the program is very influenced and directly involve to the drilling operation that might risks the drilling operation, in term of well stability and well cost perspective. Thus, the effective and efficient techniques are highly required in the making of proper formation evaluation program. The main purpose of formation evaluation is to get a better understanding of subsurface geology and developed geothermal system so the best future strategy of field development can be determined. By doing this evaluation while drilling, it will give an advantage to the drilling operation itself. Knowledge of the real-time drilled formation, in term of its behavior, characteristic, and composition, will help the improvement of drilling performance and increase the well success ratio.
    [Show full text]
  • ADIKAVI NANNAYA UNIVERSITY :: RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM Syllabus (2020-21)
    ADIKAVI NANNAYA UNIVERSITY :: RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM Syllabus (2020-21) ADIKAVI NANNAYA UNIVERSITY RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM Syllabus for Mudlogging (PG Diploma – 1 year) (2020-21 AB onwards) Department of Geology University college of Science & Technology Adikavi Nannaya University Rajahmahendravaram – 533 296, A.P., PG DIPLOMA MUD LOGGING (20-21) Page 1 of 17 ADIKAVI NANNAYA UNIVERSITY :: RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM Syllabus (2020-21) Minutes of Board of Studies in Geology Held on 21.12.20, at 4 PM Through on-line meeting As the University Grants Commission has given permission to offer PG Diploma in Mudlogging under NSQF, the Board of studies in geology has been convened to prepare the course structure and syllabi. Agenda: Preparation of Syllabi for Mudlogging program Members Prof. Y. Srinivasa Rao, Chairman Dr. KN Ratnam, Head of the Department Prof. KSN Reddy, Andhra University Dr. K. Ratnakar, Nagarjuna Univ., Sri PVV Satyanarayana, GM-Area Manager, ONGC (Representing Sri. Vadiraj, Forward Basin Manager) Dr. V. Balaram, former-CSIR Scientist, NGRI Dr. KV Swamy, AKNU Dr.KS Peter, AKNU Dr. G. Apparao, AKNU D. Teja, AKNU Resolutions: 1. After having detailed discussion, the committee has resolved and approved the proposed course structure and syllabi. 2. The regulations for examination and evaluation will be as PG Science program of the university 3. In the first semester, field work on geological mapping and report and second semester, institutional/industrial or case-study review based project work, report preparation and presentation will be conducted. PG DIPLOMA MUD LOGGING (20-21) Page 2 of 17 ADIKAVI NANNAYA UNIVERSITY :: RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM Syllabus (2020-21) PG Diploma in MUD LOGGING AIM OF THE COURSE The course provides the students with the basic skills and techniques needed to analyse and interpret the mudlogging data in the hydrocarbon exploration and development activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Petroleum Engineering Introduction to Petroleum Engineering
    INTRODUCTION To PetrOLEUM ENGINEERING INTRODUCTION TO PETROLEUM ENGINEERING JOHN R. FANCHI and RICHARD L. CHRISTIANSEN Copyright © 2017 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per‐copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750‐8400, fax (978) 750‐4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748‐6011, fax (201) 748‐6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
    [Show full text]
  • AADE-07-NTCE-44 Conocophillips Onshore Drilling Centre in Norway
    AADE-07-NTCE-44 ConocoPhillips Onshore Drilling Centre in Norway - A Virtual Tour of the Centre Including a Link Up with Offshore Mike Herbert, Reagan James and John Aurlien, ConocoPhillips Norway Copyright 2007, AADE This paper was prepared for presentation at the 2007 AADE National Technical Conference and Exhibition held at the Wyndam Greenspoint Hotel, Houston, Texas, April 10-12, 2007. This conference was sponsored by the American Association of Drilling Engineers. The information presented in this paper does not reflect any position, claim or endorsement made or implied by the American Association of Drilling Engineers, their officers or members. Questions concerning the content of this paper should be directed to the individuals listed as author(s) of this work. Abstract “eField or Integrated Operations include the use of This paper outlines the industry-leading experiences of the information technology to change work processes to achieve COPNo. drilling group over the last 3 years within Integrated better decisions, to remotely control equipment and related Operations and real-time operations. processes, and to move functions and operations personnel onshore” as stated in the Norwegian White Paper, number 38, Integrated Work Process Developments 2002. The integration processes are best expressed in the chart Integrated Operations are often characterized by operational shown in Fig. 1. The industry sees the following development concepts where new information and communication scenario for IO2 where the Generation 2 processes develop as technologies are used in real time to optimize offshore oil and a result of more integration not only internally, but externally gas exploration and production resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Mud Logging – Rapid Analyses of Well Gases with an Agilent Micro GC
    Mud Logging – Rapid Analyses of Well Gases with an Agilent Micro GC Application Note Oil and Gas Exploration, Mud Logging Author Remko van Loon Agilent Technologies, Inc. Abstract Oil and gas exploration operations require the analysis of dissolved natural gas in samples from the well within short run times. This application note addresses the use of an Agilent Micro GC for rapid, accurate mud logging analysis. Analytical test - ing of drilling fluid sample using the Agilent Micro GC has proven to be an excellent technique for analyzing individual hydrocarbon gases to assist with lithology reports for the mud logging field. The instrument's small form factor and low consumption of operating gas provides an ideal solution to incorporate into drilling operations. Introduction Table 1. Instrument Conditions Instrument Agilent 490 Micro GC Mud logging, or hydrocarbon well logging, is the process by which well owners obtain information about the lithology and Channel 1 fluid content of their well. In this process, small pieces of rock Column Agilent PoraPLOT Q , 10 m or other sediment and the mud that surround it are brought to Column temperature 60 °C the surface of a borehole by drilling. The sediment and mud Column pressure 240 kPa, helium are analyzed to provide a detailed description of the borehole. Channel 2 Hydrocarbon exploration operations requires the determina - Column Agilent PoraPLOT Q , 4 m tion of natural gas in the well, which is critical information Column temperature 150 °C when making decisions on additional drilling or production. Column pressure 120 kPa, helium Gas detection for this purpose is typically performed in a mobile lab, located near the drill site.
    [Show full text]
  • What Causes Mudlogging Mud Gas Response to Vary? William S
    AADE-19-NTCE-050 What Causes Mudlogging Mud Gas Response to Vary? William S. Donovan, Donovan Brothers Incorporated and Automated Mudlogging Systems Copyright 2019, AADE This paper was prepared for presentation at the 2019 AADE National Technical Conference, and Exhibition held at the Hilton Denver City Center, Denver, Colorado, April 9-10, 2019. This conference is sponsored by the American Association of Drilling Engineers. The information presented in this paper does not reflect any position, claim or endorsement made or implied by the American Association of Drilling Engineers, their officers or members. Questions concerning the content of this paper should be directed to the individual(s) listed as author(s) of this work. Abstract A mudlog is typically presented in a measured depth format: Mudlogging has been used to determine over-pressured drilling rate (ROP), total gas as measured in the mudlogging zones, balanced mud weight, and gas in the formations while unit, its gas constituents, drill cuttings lithology, the presence drilling, but the mud gas response varies widely, and the causes of oil in the cuttings, and cuttings fluorescence. These are poorly understood. It is not uncommon to see as much as a measurements and information are gathered periodically on the ten-fold variation in mud gas response while drilling formations drilling rig. that have similar logs. Also, cumulative production has a poor Drilling parameters – or their proxies, such as string weight, correlation with mudlogging mud gas response in horizontal weight on bit, block height, drillstring length, pump strokes, wells. Mudlogging can be improved and more effective if we pump capacity per stroke, pump pressure, mud motor rotation, understand and account for the mud gas variations.
    [Show full text]