Oilfield Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oilfield Review The Expanding Role of Mud Logging Peter Ablard For decades, samples and measurements obtained at the surface have provided mud Chris Bell Chevron North Sea Limited loggers with insights into conditions at the bit face. Information captured through Aberdeen, Scotland mud logging gave operators early indications of reservoir potential and even warned David Cook of impending formation pressure problems. New sampling and analysis techniques, Ivan Fornasier Jean-Pierre Poyet along with advances in surface sensor design and monitoring, are bringing the Sachin Sharma science of mud logging into the 21st century. Roissy-en-France, France Kevin Fielding Laura Lawton Hess Services UK Limited The mud logging unit has long been a common against deployment of wireline logging tools. In London, England wellsite fixture. First introduced commercially in such wells, analysis of mud gas and cuttings often 1939, these mobile laboratories carried little provided the first, and perhaps only, indication George Haines more than a coffee pot, a microscope for examin- that a formation might be productive. Today, Houston, Texas, USA ing formation cuttings and a hotwire sensor for although LWD technology is able to give the first detecting the amount of hydrocarbon gas encoun- glimpses of near-bit conditions in real time, Mark A. Herkommer tered while drilling. The mud logger’s job was to adverse wellbore conditions sometimes preclude Conroe, Texas record the depth and describe the lithology of the use of downhole logging tools. In such cases, formations that the drill bit encountered, then the mud log continues to inform operators of the Kevin McCarthy determine whether those formations contained producibility of their wells. At a minimum, the BP Exploration any oil or gas. mud log gives the operator an early indication of Houston, Texas Outside the logging unit, the mud logger’s zones that merit special attention, additional log- Maja Radakovic domain ranged from the shale shaker to the drill ging services or production tests. Sinopec-Addax floor. The shale shaker yielded formation cuttings The mud log serves a variety of functions. As a Geneva, Switzerland and gas—both liberated by the drill bit—which correlation tool, the mud log’s ROP and total gas were transported to the surface in the drilling curves exhibit a remarkable correspondence to Lawrence Umar fluid. Periodic visits to the shaker permitted the gamma ray and resistivity curves, respectively.1 Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd mud logger to collect cuttings for microscopic Throughout the drilling process, mud logs pro- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia examination, while a suction line between the vide real-time correlations with logs from neigh- Oilfield Review Spring 2012: 24, no. 1. shaker and the logging unit carried gas from the boring wells and help the operator track the bit’s Copyright © 2012 Schlumberger. gas trap to the logging unit’s hotwire gas detec- position in relation to target formations. Because For help in preparation of this article, thanks to Justin tion system. Visits to the drill floor allowed the mud log is based on physical samples, it pro- Ashar, Kamel Benseddik, Regis Gallard, Willie Stoker and Craig Williamson, Houston; John Christie, Paris; Gen important exchanges of information between the vides direct, positive identification of lithology Herga and Denise Jackson, Gatwick, England; Mark Jayne, mud logger and driller. Using basic surface mea- and hydrocarbon content. This information can Francois Le buhan, Remi Lepoutre, Jacques Lessi, Audrey Malmin, Keith Ross and Philippe Verdenal, Roissy-en- surements, the mud logger was able to produce a be helpful when formation characteristics make France, France; Nikhil Patel, Singapore; and Irwan Roze, concise account of drilling activity. wireline or LWD log interpretation complicated Conroe, Texas. FLAIR, MDT, PreVue, RFT, StethoScope and Thema are For decades, gas measurements, lithology and or ambiguous. It can also fill gaps where other marks of Schlumberger. rate of penetration (ROP) provided the earliest such measurements have not been obtained. 1. Like electric logs, most mud logs conform to format indications of reservoir potential. Before the Thus, when integrated with wireline or LWD mea- standards set forth by the Society of Professional Well Log Analysts (SPWLA). For mud log standards advent of measurements while drilling (MWD) surements, cores and well test data, the mud log promulgated by SPWLA: Mercer RF and McAdams JB: and logging while drilling (LWD), mud loggers provides independent evidence for a more com- “Standards for Hydrocarbon Well Logging,” Transactions of the SPWLA 23rd Annual Logging Symposium, were able to obtain valuable formation data from prehensive understanding of reservoir conditions Corpus Christi, Texas, USA, July 6–9, 1982, paper LL. wells in which drilling conditions, formation and geology. characteristics or well trajectory conspired 24 Oilfield Review Drill floor Mud mixing pit Mud pumps Suction pit Sand trap Settling pit Mud logging cabin Reserve pit The scope of the basic mud logging service The mud logger’s role takes on added impor- From a drilling standpoint, the mud logger’s has broadened over time, as additional sensors tance when there is a drilling break, or signifi- most important task is gas monitoring. Mud gas brought more data into the logging unit— cant increase in ROP. Then the mud logger alerts trends that develop while drilling are integral to expanding in diversity from gas chromatographs the company representative and requests that evaluation of mud balance and identification of to weight-on-bit and mud pit level indicators. The drilling be stopped until mud and cuttings from potentially overpressured formations. By care- mud logging service now typically tracks ROP, the bit face can be circulated to the surface. If fully tracking gas and drilling parameters, the lithology, visual hydrocarbon indicators, total mud analysis indicates the presence of hydrocar- mud logger can recognize impending deviations combustible gas in mud and individual hydrocar- bons—called a show—the mud logger informs from normal trends and give advance warning so bon compounds in the gas, along with numerous the geologist, who may elect to core or test the the driller and company representative can miti- drilling parameters. As a hub for monitoring drill- interval. Geochemists and biostratigraphers also gate the problem by adjusting the density of the ing operations and rig sensors, the mud logging rely on mud loggers to collect representative drilling fluid or shutting in the well. Thus, the unit has become a source of crucial information samples needed to make correlations and develop success of a well and the safety of the drilling for the company representative, the driller and geologic models. operation may hinge on how quickly a mud logger the geologist. can synthesize and interpret myriad pieces of data. Spring 2012 25 Mud logging capabilities have evolved over Advances in computing and networking tech- This article describes how a basic mud log is the years. By the mid-1950s, gas samples were nology, surface sensor design and sample analysis assembled, reviews sampling and analysis tech- being analyzed by wellsite gas chromatography. are bringing the mud logging unit into the 21st niques used in formation evaluation and dis- In the 1960s, mud logging companies began offer- century. Today, even more sensors lead into the cusses basic methods for monitoring pressure. An ing geopressure detection services.2 Automated logging unit, each acquiring data at a frequency of overview of recent sensor technology maps the event recorders, made possible through use of several times per second. To handle this increase evolutionary path from basic formation evalua- robust microelectronic components, were incor- in data volume, a context-aware processing sys- tion to advanced analysis of mud gases for geolo- porated into mud logging processes during the tem—based on computer-generated trend lines gists and well integrity services for drillers. 1970s. During the following decade, mud logging and a library of established models—makes the units entered the computer age. Computers took data easier for the mud logger and other end users Mechanics of Mud Logging the burden of printing the log away from the mud to comprehend. Digital images of samples viewed In the oil field, drilling fluid is integral to every drill- logger, who used to laboriously compile the data under the microscope can be rapidly transmitted ing project. Be it water-base, oil-base or gas-base, and then draw the log by hand. In addition, com- from the wellsite to the client office. And new drilling fluid is vital to the process of making hole: puters allowed mud loggers to organize and approaches to gas sampling and analysis have s)TSTREAMSUNDERPRESSURETHROUGHJETNOZZLES track data from multiple sources without sen- been developed to extract geochemical properties on the drill bit to clean the bit and carry heat sory overload. at the wellsite. away from the bit face. s)TTRANSPORTSDRILLCUTTINGSFROMTHEBITFACETO the surface, thus playing an essential role in the hole cleaning process. s)TOFFSETSBOTTOMHOLEPRESSURETOHELPMAINTAIN Traveling block wellbore stability and prevent the influx of for- mation fluids that could cause blowouts. Over time, numerous variations on the basic Standpipe mixture of clay- and freshwater-base drilling flu- ids have been developed (and sometimes dis- Kelly Flowline carded). Well-known variations are based on Rotary table saltwater, mineral oil, diesel oil, polymers, nitro- Mud logging unit Gas trap gen, mist and foam. Each type has specific prop- Drill floor Suction line Shale shaker erties that deliver superior performance in Bell nipple certain drilling environments. And each requires Blowout preventer special accommodations when it comes to mud logging: Some require custom sampling tech- niques; others require special sample rinsing pro- Mud Suction Shaker Reserve cedures. This section focuses on the simplest of pump pit pit pit Casing environments, in which freshwater-base drilling muds are used. The practice of mud logging relies heavily on the mud circulation system, which carries forma- tion cuttings and fluids to the surface.
Recommended publications
  • GW-MLE Mud Logging Equipment
    GW-MLE Mud Logging Equipment Science & Technology Management Department, CNPC 2015 CHINA NATIONAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION GW-MLE Mud Logging Equipment: “Penetrating Eyesight” of Petroleum Drilling! Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Characteristic Technologies 6 3 Typical Cases 15 4 Scientific Research Equipment 18 5 Qualification Standards 20 6 Expert Team 22 China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) CNPC was ranked 3th among the world’s largest is a state-authorized investment agency and a 50 oil companies and 4th in Fortune Global 500 in state holding company. On July 1998, with the 2014. implementation of the Institutional reform of the CNPC strictly follows by the combined strategies State Council, CNPC was reorgnized to become of increasing resource capacity, expanding market an integrated oil company of cross-regions, cross- shares and consolidating the international role, and industries and cross-countries, it adopts modern persists in regarding technical innovation as a key enterprise system to realize the integrations of framework to advance technological progress. To upstream and downstream operations, internal and develop its core businesses, focuses will be placed external trade, production and marketing. CNPC’s on the solutions of key bottleneck technologies business covers six main sectors: oil and gas and key proprietary technologies. Thanks to operations, petroleum engineering service, petroleum continuously improving of the technical innovation engineering construction, petroleum equipment system, optimizing the configuration of technological manufacturing, financial services and new energy resources and strengthening the construction of development. In 2014 CNPC produced 113.67 million strong talent teams, CNPC’s technological creativity tons of crude oil and 95.46 billion cubic meters of has been considerably upgraded.
    [Show full text]
  • 2767738 Automation Provides Unique Insights of the Rock Record And
    ID: - 2767738 Automation Provides Unique Insights of The Rock Record and Subsurface Through the Delivery of a Robotic Sample Collection and Analysis Device David Tonner, Diversified Well Logging, Houston TX, USA, Aaron Swanson, Diversified Well Logging, Houston TX, USA, Ron Hollingshead, Diversified Well Logging Houston TX, USA, Simon Hughes, Diversified Well Logging Houston TX, USA , Stephen Seacrest, PetroLegacy Energy Austin TX, USA, Bret McDaniel PetroLegacy Energy Austin TX, USA ABSTRACT Abstract Objectives/Scope: From the very early days of oil and gas exploration, appraisal and development drilling, samples have been collected at the rig by mud logging personnel to conduct a preliminary geological analysis of the rock being drilled. This collection typically involves a sample collection recipient, board or bucket to collect a sample of rock over the desired interval. The sample is then sieved and cleaned in the appropriate way depending on the type of drilling fluid being used. As penetration rates have increased in some instances to more than 400 ft. / hr. the sample resolution has deteriorated exponentially. From an ergonomics perspective, the highest frequency to which a person onsite can collect a sample is once every 20 minutes. At 300 ft. / hr. this translates to 100 ft. of drilled rock. A new device has been developed and deployed which automates this manual process and thus ensures faster and more accurate collection of geological samples of the drilled rock interval. Sample resolutions of 5ft rock intervals have been attained at 400 ft./ hr. This technology has provided an important technological breakthrough and enables reduction of personnel at the rig site with a subsequent reduction in cost and HSE risk, particularly in areas of H2S.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Practice of Formation Evaluation Program in Geothermal Drilling
    PROCEEDINGS, 46th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California, February 15-17, 2021 SGP-TR-218 Common Practice of Formation Evaluation Program in Geothermal Drilling Vicky R. Chandra1, Ribka F. Asokawati2, Dorman P. Purba3 1PT Geo Dipa Energi, Jl. Warung Buncit Raya No.75, Jakarta, Indonesia 2PT Rigsis Energi Indonesia, Equity Tower, 49th Floor, Jl. Jend. Sudirman, Jakarta, Indonesia 3PT Enerka Bhumi Pratama, Kawasan Komersial Cilandak Gudang 410, Jakarta Selatan 12560, Indonesia [email protected] Keywords: technique, petrography, xrd, methylene blue, formation evaluation, cutting, coring, pressure, temperature, spinner, rock pH, borehole image, drilling, mudlogging, geothermal ABSTRACT Formation evaluation program in drilling operation, particularly geothermal drilling, is very much determined by the purpose and objective of drilling itself. During early exploration phase, the formation evaluation program is carried out by collecting as much subsurface information as possible. This was applied because of available subsurface data to support the development geothermal project are very limited. On the other hand, the program is very influenced and directly involve to the drilling operation that might risks the drilling operation, in term of well stability and well cost perspective. Thus, the effective and efficient techniques are highly required in the making of proper formation evaluation program. The main purpose of formation evaluation is to get a better understanding of subsurface geology and developed geothermal system so the best future strategy of field development can be determined. By doing this evaluation while drilling, it will give an advantage to the drilling operation itself. Knowledge of the real-time drilled formation, in term of its behavior, characteristic, and composition, will help the improvement of drilling performance and increase the well success ratio.
    [Show full text]
  • Geosteering Improves Bakken Results
    JANUARY 2012 The “Better Business” Publication Serving the Exploration / Drilling / Production Industry Geosteering Improves Bakken Results By Kevin O’Connell, NPE is drilling and developing two blocks, in Divide, Williams and McKenzie coun- David Skari, aggregating approximately 50,000 net acres ties. Wells are being drilled to target zones Aaron J. Wheeler in the heart of the Bakken Shale in Divide, located between 9,000 and 11,000 feet and Allan Rennie Williams, Dunn and McKenzie counties, true vertical depth. The horizontal pro- N.D. (Figure 1). Led by a highly experienced, ducing sections of the wells average 8,000 DENVER–Developing tight oil and technologically focused management team, feet of lateral, which is cased, perforated gas-bearing formations often requires a the company prides itself on customizing its and fractured in multiple stages. The two dense pattern of wells with long lateral drilling and completion methods to the primary intervals targeted within the oil sections. To produce such fields econom- unique geological and geophysical charac- reservoir are a clean dolomite member of ically, producing sections of wells must teristics of its core project blocks. the Three Forks formation and a 15-foot be positioned accurately within the targeted zone below a tight limestone within the Drilling History intervals, while drilling costs are kept to Bakken Middle Member. a minimum. Since early in 2010, Ensign Rigs Nos. Initially, the horizontal production wells A cost-effective solution has been de- 89 and 118 have been working for NPE required drilling a vertical pilot hole that veloped that includes predrill modeling was sidetracked, deviated from vertical of logging-while-drilling measurements FIGURE 1 to build the curve, then drilled laterally along the trajectory of a planned well to North Plains Energy LLC Area of within the producing zone.
    [Show full text]
  • ADIKAVI NANNAYA UNIVERSITY :: RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM Syllabus (2020-21)
    ADIKAVI NANNAYA UNIVERSITY :: RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM Syllabus (2020-21) ADIKAVI NANNAYA UNIVERSITY RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM Syllabus for Mudlogging (PG Diploma – 1 year) (2020-21 AB onwards) Department of Geology University college of Science & Technology Adikavi Nannaya University Rajahmahendravaram – 533 296, A.P., PG DIPLOMA MUD LOGGING (20-21) Page 1 of 17 ADIKAVI NANNAYA UNIVERSITY :: RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM Syllabus (2020-21) Minutes of Board of Studies in Geology Held on 21.12.20, at 4 PM Through on-line meeting As the University Grants Commission has given permission to offer PG Diploma in Mudlogging under NSQF, the Board of studies in geology has been convened to prepare the course structure and syllabi. Agenda: Preparation of Syllabi for Mudlogging program Members Prof. Y. Srinivasa Rao, Chairman Dr. KN Ratnam, Head of the Department Prof. KSN Reddy, Andhra University Dr. K. Ratnakar, Nagarjuna Univ., Sri PVV Satyanarayana, GM-Area Manager, ONGC (Representing Sri. Vadiraj, Forward Basin Manager) Dr. V. Balaram, former-CSIR Scientist, NGRI Dr. KV Swamy, AKNU Dr.KS Peter, AKNU Dr. G. Apparao, AKNU D. Teja, AKNU Resolutions: 1. After having detailed discussion, the committee has resolved and approved the proposed course structure and syllabi. 2. The regulations for examination and evaluation will be as PG Science program of the university 3. In the first semester, field work on geological mapping and report and second semester, institutional/industrial or case-study review based project work, report preparation and presentation will be conducted. PG DIPLOMA MUD LOGGING (20-21) Page 2 of 17 ADIKAVI NANNAYA UNIVERSITY :: RAJAHMAHENDRAVARAM Syllabus (2020-21) PG Diploma in MUD LOGGING AIM OF THE COURSE The course provides the students with the basic skills and techniques needed to analyse and interpret the mudlogging data in the hydrocarbon exploration and development activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Formation Evaluation
    Introduction to Formation Evaluation By Abiodun Matthew Amao Monday, September 09, 2013 Well Logging PGE 492 1 Lecture Outline • What is formation evaluation? • Why do we evaluate formation? • What do we evaluate? • What data are we interested in? • Who needs these data? • What tools and methodology? • Summary • References Monday, September 09, 2013 Well Logging PGE 492 2 What is formation evaluation? • Formation evaluation is the application of scientific principles, engineering concepts and technological innovations in the exploration and prospecting of hydrocarbon resources in geological formations in an environmentally sustainable and responsible manner. • It involves detailed and systematic data acquisition, gathering, analysis and interpretation both qualitatively and quantitatively while applying scientific and engineering principles. • It is an ever growing and evolving field of petroleum engineering • Petrophysicists are engineers or geologists that specialize in the profession of formation evaluation. Monday, September 09, 2013 Well Logging PGE 492 3 Why do we evaluate formation? • We want answers to the following questions: • Is there any oil or gas there? • Where are they located? • How much of it? • How much can we produce, which answers the question, “How much money can we make?” Monday, September 09, 2013 Well Logging PGE 492 4 What do we evaluate? • We evaluate a reservoir; a reservoir is the “container” storing the hydrocarbon. • A conventional reservoir will be characterized by the following properties; – Trap/Cap Rock
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Non-Nuclear Techniques for Well Logging: Technology Evaluation
    PNNL-19867 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Evaluation of Non-Nuclear Techniques for Well Logging: Technology Evaluation LJ Bond RV Harris KM Denslow TL Moran JW Griffin DM Sheen GE Dale T Schenkel November 2010 PNNL-19867 Evaluation of Non-Nuclear Techniques for Well Logging: Technology Evaluation LJ Bond RV Harris KM Denslow TL Moran JW Griffin DM Sheen GE Dale(a) T Schenkel(b) November 2010 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 ___________________ (a) Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 (b) Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, California 94720 Abstract Sealed, chemical isotope radiation sources have a diverse range of industrial applications. There is concern that such sources currently used in the gas/oil well logging industry (e.g., americium-beryllium [AmBe], 252Cf, 60Co, and 137Cs) can potentially be diverted and used in dirty bombs. Recent actions by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) have reduced the availability of these sources in the United States. Alternatives, both radiological and non-radiological methods, are actively being sought within the oil- field services community. The use of isotopic sources can potentially be further reduced, and source use reduction made more acceptable to the user community, if suitable non-nuclear or non-isotope–based well logging techniques can be developed. Data acquired with these non-nuclear techniques must be demonstrated to correlate with that acquired using isotope sources and historic records. To enable isotopic source reduction there is a need to assess technologies to determine (i) if it is technically feasible to replace isotopic sources with alternate sensing technologies and (ii) to provide independent technical data to guide DOE (and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission [NRC]) on issues relating to replacement and/or reduction of radioactive sources used in well logging.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment and Evaluation of the Conductor Pipe Setting Depth on Shallow Water Wells
    Jerome J. Schubert, Ph.D. PE. Assistant Professor 501 K Richardson Building 979-862-1195 [email protected] RISK ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION OF THE CONDUCTOR PIPE SETTING DEPTH ON SHALLOW WATER WELLS MMS PROJECT NO. 495 Final Report Authors, Yong B. Tu, Texas A&M University Graduate Assistant Research Jerome J. Schubert, Ph.D. PE, Texas A&M University Assistant Professor Sulistyo Protomo, Texas A&M University Graduate Assistant Amirsaman Paknejad, Texas A&M University Graduate Assistant 3116 TAMU, College Station, Texas 77843-3116 (979) 845-2241 / FAX (979) 845-1307 / http://pumpjack.tamu.edu Risk assessment and evaluation of the conductor pipe setting depth on shallow water wells Yong B. Tu, and Jerome J. Schubert, Texas A&M University Executive Summary Introduction Faced with geopolitical and global economic uncertainties, many leading O&G corporations have placed deliberate emphasis on marketing their “shallow water” and “economically volatile” assets to small independent O&G companies. However, due to recent technological advancements in production systems, it is economically feasible for small independent O&G companies to pursue these “unwanted” assets as part of own portfolio. It is anticipated that these operators will introduce new wells into these mature fields to perform further well testing and new developments to the acquired assets. Early drilling studies and guidelines have mentioned casing design and well control issues. However, they have neglected situations where upward fluid migration can lead to abnormally pressured shallow formations, especially in a developed field. Even in situations where there has not been any artificial charging of shallow formations, selection of conductor and surface casing setting depths has, in the past, been based more on tradition than sound engineering practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Mud Logging – Rapid Analyses of Well Gases with an Agilent Micro GC
    Mud Logging – Rapid Analyses of Well Gases with an Agilent Micro GC Application Note Oil and Gas Exploration, Mud Logging Author Remko van Loon Agilent Technologies, Inc. Abstract Oil and gas exploration operations require the analysis of dissolved natural gas in samples from the well within short run times. This application note addresses the use of an Agilent Micro GC for rapid, accurate mud logging analysis. Analytical test - ing of drilling fluid sample using the Agilent Micro GC has proven to be an excellent technique for analyzing individual hydrocarbon gases to assist with lithology reports for the mud logging field. The instrument's small form factor and low consumption of operating gas provides an ideal solution to incorporate into drilling operations. Introduction Table 1. Instrument Conditions Instrument Agilent 490 Micro GC Mud logging, or hydrocarbon well logging, is the process by which well owners obtain information about the lithology and Channel 1 fluid content of their well. In this process, small pieces of rock Column Agilent PoraPLOT Q , 10 m or other sediment and the mud that surround it are brought to Column temperature 60 °C the surface of a borehole by drilling. The sediment and mud Column pressure 240 kPa, helium are analyzed to provide a detailed description of the borehole. Channel 2 Hydrocarbon exploration operations requires the determina - Column Agilent PoraPLOT Q , 4 m tion of natural gas in the well, which is critical information Column temperature 150 °C when making decisions on additional drilling or production. Column pressure 120 kPa, helium Gas detection for this purpose is typically performed in a mobile lab, located near the drill site.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C: Well Drilling Procedure
    Table L1. Proposed CO2 Injection Well – Casing Specifications Tensile Depth Size Weight Collapse/ TUBULAR Grade Thread Body/Joint (ft) (in) (lb./ft) Burst (psi) (X 1000 lbs.) Conductor 0 - 40 13-3/8 48 H-40 ST&C 770/1,730 541/322 Surface Casing 0 – 965 9-5/8 36 J-55 ST&C 2,020/3,520 564/394 Protection Casing 0 – 4,000 5-1/2 15.5 J-55 LT&C 4,040/4,810 248/217 Well Drilling Program The following sections contain the proposed step-by-step program for drilling and completing the proposed CO2 Injection Well. The CO2 Injection Well will be used for baseline monitoring and characterization, injection of the CO2 fluid during the active experiment, and post-injection monitoring of the intervals of interest. DRILLING PROCEDURE CONDUCTOR HOLE 1. Prepare surface pad location and install well cellar. 2. Mobilize drilling rig. Perform safety audit during rig-up to ensure that equipment setup complies with project requirements. 3. Notify Arizona Oil and Gas Conservation Commission at least 48 hours prior to spudding the well. 4. Drill mouse and rat holes. 5. Drill 17-1/2” conductor hole to +/-40 feet. Install 13-3/8” casing and grout annular space from set depth to surface with concrete. 6. Wait on concrete to cure for 12 hours. SURFACE HOLE 7. Rig up mud logging unit and test equipment. Collect and save 10-foot samples from 40 feet to total depth. A set of samples is required to be submitted to the Oil and Gas Administrator, Arizona Geological Survey, within 30 days of completion of the well.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation Evaluation with Pre-Digital Well Logs Formation Evaluation with Pre-Digital Well Logs
    Formation Evaluation with Pre-Digital Well Logs Formation Evaluation with Pre-Digital Well Logs RICHARD M. BATEMAN Elsevier Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom 50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States Copyright © 2020 Richard M. Bateman. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions. This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein). Notices Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary. Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility. To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
    [Show full text]
  • What Causes Mudlogging Mud Gas Response to Vary? William S
    AADE-19-NTCE-050 What Causes Mudlogging Mud Gas Response to Vary? William S. Donovan, Donovan Brothers Incorporated and Automated Mudlogging Systems Copyright 2019, AADE This paper was prepared for presentation at the 2019 AADE National Technical Conference, and Exhibition held at the Hilton Denver City Center, Denver, Colorado, April 9-10, 2019. This conference is sponsored by the American Association of Drilling Engineers. The information presented in this paper does not reflect any position, claim or endorsement made or implied by the American Association of Drilling Engineers, their officers or members. Questions concerning the content of this paper should be directed to the individual(s) listed as author(s) of this work. Abstract A mudlog is typically presented in a measured depth format: Mudlogging has been used to determine over-pressured drilling rate (ROP), total gas as measured in the mudlogging zones, balanced mud weight, and gas in the formations while unit, its gas constituents, drill cuttings lithology, the presence drilling, but the mud gas response varies widely, and the causes of oil in the cuttings, and cuttings fluorescence. These are poorly understood. It is not uncommon to see as much as a measurements and information are gathered periodically on the ten-fold variation in mud gas response while drilling formations drilling rig. that have similar logs. Also, cumulative production has a poor Drilling parameters – or their proxies, such as string weight, correlation with mudlogging mud gas response in horizontal weight on bit, block height, drillstring length, pump strokes, wells. Mudlogging can be improved and more effective if we pump capacity per stroke, pump pressure, mud motor rotation, understand and account for the mud gas variations.
    [Show full text]