Project Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Project Report Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000{000 (0000) Printed 11 September 2014 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) In situe irregular satellite formation Xiao-Chen Zheng1;2, Hagai B. Perets3, Alice Quillen4 1 Kavili institute for astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing, China 2 Department of Astronomy, Peking University, Beijing, China 3Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel 4 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA 11 September 2014 ABSTRACT We investigate formation of satellites through collisions in a planetesimal disk that is surrounding an oblique oblate planet. We find that Kozai resonance lifted particles cause large eccentricities and inclinations in the growing satellite population and this can lead to formation of a single large moon near the Laplace radius. It could be the formation mechanism for a single large moon. Besides, retrograde moon forms in some cases motivted us a possible fomation mechanism for Triton-like irregulars. 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Basic physics A satellite in orbit about an oblate planet precesses about Moons around the planets are grouped into two categories, the planet's spin axis due to the planet's gravitational poten- regular and irregular. Regular moons have low inclination tial quadrupole moment. If the planet has a non-zero obliq- and eccentricity, with respect to the planet's spin axis. uity, then this axis is tilted with respect to the star's tidal In contrast, irregular satellites can have high inclinations field. The obliquity of the planet is the angle between the and eccentricities and even orbit the planet retrograde to planet's spin axis and its orbital angular momentum axis. In- the planet's orbit (for a review see Jewitt & Haghighipour side the the Laplace radius, rL, precession is predominantly 2007). Formation of regular moons is thought to take place due to planet's gravitational quadrupole moment and out- in a gaseous circum-planetary disk (e.g., Canup & Ward side this radius, due to the stellar tide. 2006) whereas the a successful model accounting for irregu- ( ) 1 2 3 5 lar moons involves capture from heliocentric orbit (see dis- 2MpJ2Rpap rL ∼ (1) cussion by Jewitt & Haghighipour 2007). M∗ Models for terrestrial planet formation often start af- where M∗ is the stellar mass, Mp is the planet's mass, Rp ter the formation of a planetesimal disk (e.g., for a recent is the planet's equatorial radius, ap the planet's semi-major review see Raymond et al. 2014). At later stages a set of axis and J2 the planet's quadrupole gravitational moment. similar sized planets (oligarchs) can be formed, when run- The quadrupole moment can be modified to take into ac- away growth is limited by the depletion of low mass objects count the contribution from moons. The planet's orbital ec- and the dispersion in the disk. Recently Perets & Payne centricity ep can be taken into account by multiplying the 2 3 2014 showed that massive moons originally formed on co- right hand side of equation 1 by (1 − ep) 10 (see equation 24 planar orbits exterior to the region of regular moons in the by Tremaine et al. 2009). solar system can scatter each other. Scattered moons, some The Laplace surface has normal (as a function of radius of which have undergone Kozai-Lidov oscillations can give a from the planet) about which the satellite's orbit precesses population of high inclination and eccentricity irregular-like due to the combined effects of stellar tide and the planet's (but prograde) moons. Scattering can also eject moons from quadrupole moment. The Laplace surface traces the pre- the planet's Hill sphere, and these if later recaptured, can dicted shape of a thin gas disk or dissipative particulate temporarily have retrograde orbits. ring surrounding the planet (e.g., Tremaine et al. 2009). Most regular planetary satellites orbit within laplace radii In this paper we investigate formation of moons in near and probably formed from a circumplanetary gas disk (e.g., a planet with non-zero obliquity. A similar setting might Canup & Ward 2006). be planet formation in a triple star system (Pelupessy & Consider a particle in a circular orbit around the planet Portegies Zwart 2013). Studies for the inclinations of plan- with semi-major axis a. We define an angle ϕ that is the etary systems affected by binary companion stars (Batygin angle between the angular momentum vector of the parti- et al. 2011; Batygin 2012; Terquem 2013; Xiang-Gruess & cle and the planet's orbital angular momentum vector. The Papaloizou 2014) could be mentioned here. Laplace surface ϕ could be writen as (using equation 7 by ⃝c 0000 RAS 2 Zheng et al. Tremaine & Davis 2014) would result in the formation of a massive moon in retro- grade orbit could be a prospective scenario for Triton-like cos 2ϕ − a5=2r5 cot 2ϕ = p L : (2) satelliate formation without applying any other energy dis- sin 2ϕp sipation mechanism. However, the observed Triton is much where ϕp is the azimuthal angles of the planet, the obliquity closer to Neptune compare to the simulation and the inli- 1 − ∗ − nation as well as the mass in our mimic result have non- is ϕp ϕ = ϕp 2 π ignorable devergency with observed value. Actually, the lat- ter difference could contribute to the model dependence and in the simulation we only consider the inelastic collision so 2 NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS the collison outcomes are resonable to be different to the 2.1 Initial settings real case, but how could Triton migrate into such a inner region is still a puzzle, additional migration scenario is nec- The code Mercury (Chambers 1999) was modified to take cessary to be considered, tidal dissipation could be the most into account the oblateness of the planet by adding a luminous proposal. quadrupole moment to the gravitational potential. When In Fig.2, we study how moons growth with time in the two particles collide they stick together forming a single top plot, while in the bottom pattern, their individual semi- body with total mass the sum of each impactor. major axis evolving are also presenting in detail. As same Simulations begin with a single planet in orbit about a as the inferring by Fig.1, most moon mass prefer to concen- star. The planet is initial surrounded by a disk of planetes- trate in the inner region but there are large amount of small imals in circular orbits that are in the planet/star orbital planetesimals bordely distribute in the few times of laplace plane. Parameters for the simulations are listed in Table 1. radii to few tens percent of planet Hill radius with moder- The density assumed for planetesimals is that of the largest ate excitation in orbit which could be the origin of irrgular −3 moon and is between 1-2 g cm . Initial planetesimal sepa- group. ration was 7 rH with the mutual Hill radius For comprison, planetsimals in Neptune system are also 2µ 1=3 ai + ai+1 ai+1 − ai initially at the anylatic laplace plane and the equator plane, RH = ( ) ; k = (3) 3 2 RH shown in Fig .3 and Fig.4, respectively. The final mass distri- bution in two plots show similar features, there is one mas- We ran three sets of simulations: sive object form at the reference plane within one laplace • Series A: started with planetesimals initial in the radii in both cases, while beyond the region, small plan- planet's orbital plane. etesimals are randomly dispersed around the circum-stellar • Series B: with planetesimals started in the Laplace sur- plane which is consistent to the A1 series. The absence of face. retrograde object in B1 and C1 series could contribute to • Series C: with planetesimals started in a planet perpen- the overlap of laplace surface with the primary location of dicular to the planet's spin axis (the obliquity plane). plantesimals within laplace radii, therefore the inclination of most planetesimals in this region are impossible to be The A1 simulation uses parameters for Neptune. greatly excietd by quadropole torque of host planet. We also run a couple of test simulations with the same To have a basic idea that how could the planet's obliq- parameters as these series but a zero obliquity. uity take effect on moon formation, in Fig.5, we consider the planetesimals evolving around one zero-obliquity planet. As what we expected, collisions of planetesimals in such a non- 2.2 Results and discussion J2 system are not as effeciency as A1, B1 and C1 series Figure 1 shows the result of the A1 simulations. Instead resulting in the absence of massive moon after 1 Myr evolu- of the analyatic laplace surface derived by equation 2, the tion. Therefore, we could rougly conclude that the planet's planetesimals are initially located at the reference plane, in obliquity has significant influnece on the observed configu- another words, they are primarily considering to be born ration of surrounding moons. at the circumstellar disk. After 1 Myr evolving, there is a Besides, the moon formation around Saturn system is massive object formed within one rL, caused by increase also studied in Fig.6, Fig.7 and Fig.8. The planetsimals are in collisions probability due to Kozai oscillations near rL. initially located at reference plane, laplace surface and equa- Beyond the laplace radii, most plantesimals are smaller in tor plane, respectively. In both cases, after 1 Myr evolution, mass, and even one or two dominated bodies formed, they there is no massive moon formed within one laplace radii, it are prefering to orbit around rL rather than outer region.
Recommended publications
  • JUICE Red Book
    ESA/SRE(2014)1 September 2014 JUICE JUpiter ICy moons Explorer Exploring the emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants Definition Study Report European Space Agency 1 This page left intentionally blank 2 Mission Description Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer Key science goals The emergence of habitable worlds around gas giants Characterise Ganymede, Europa and Callisto as planetary objects and potential habitats Explore the Jupiter system as an archetype for gas giants Payload Ten instruments Laser Altimeter Radio Science Experiment Ice Penetrating Radar Visible-Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging Spectrometer Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph Imaging System Magnetometer Particle Package Submillimetre Wave Instrument Radio and Plasma Wave Instrument Overall mission profile 06/2022 - Launch by Ariane-5 ECA + EVEE Cruise 01/2030 - Jupiter orbit insertion Jupiter tour Transfer to Callisto (11 months) Europa phase: 2 Europa and 3 Callisto flybys (1 month) Jupiter High Latitude Phase: 9 Callisto flybys (9 months) Transfer to Ganymede (11 months) 09/2032 – Ganymede orbit insertion Ganymede tour Elliptical and high altitude circular phases (5 months) Low altitude (500 km) circular orbit (4 months) 06/2033 – End of nominal mission Spacecraft 3-axis stabilised Power: solar panels: ~900 W HGA: ~3 m, body fixed X and Ka bands Downlink ≥ 1.4 Gbit/day High Δv capability (2700 m/s) Radiation tolerance: 50 krad at equipment level Dry mass: ~1800 kg Ground TM stations ESTRAC network Key mission drivers Radiation tolerance and technology Power budget and solar arrays challenges Mass budget Responsibilities ESA: manufacturing, launch, operations of the spacecraft and data archiving PI Teams: science payload provision, operations, and data analysis 3 Foreword The JUICE (JUpiter ICy moon Explorer) mission, selected by ESA in May 2012 to be the first large mission within the Cosmic Vision Program 2015–2025, will provide the most comprehensive exploration to date of the Jovian system in all its complexity, with particular emphasis on Ganymede as a planetary body and potential habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroid Retrieval Mission
    Where you can put your asteroid Nathan Strange, Damon Landau, and ARRM team NASA/JPL-CalTech © 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Distant Retrograde Orbits Works for Earth, Moon, Mars, Phobos, Deimos etc… very stable orbits Other Lunar Storage Orbit Options • Lagrange Points – Earth-Moon L1/L2 • Unstable; this instability enables many interesting low-energy transfers but vehicles require active station keeping to stay in vicinity of L1/L2 – Earth-Moon L4/L5 • Some orbits in this region is may be stable, but are difficult for MPCV to reach • Lunar Weakly Captured Orbits – These are the transition from high lunar orbits to Lagrange point orbits – They are a new and less well understood class of orbits that could be long term stable and could be easier for the MPCV to reach than DROs – More study is needed to determine if these are good options • Intermittent Capture – Weakly captured Earth orbit, escapes and is then recaptured a year later • Earth Orbit with Lunar Gravity Assists – Many options with Earth-Moon gravity assist tours Backflip Orbits • A backflip orbit is two flybys half a rev apart • Could be done with the Moon, Earth or Mars. Backflip orbit • Lunar backflips are nice plane because they could be used to “catch and release” asteroids • Earth backflips are nice orbits in which to construct things out of asteroids before sending them on to places like Earth- Earth or Moon orbit plane Mars cyclers 4 Example Mars Cyclers Two-Synodic-Period Cycler Three-Synodic-Period Cycler Possibly Ballistic Chen, et al., “Powered Earth-Mars Cycler with Three Synodic-Period Repeat Time,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Sept.-Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Irregular Jovian Moons with IVO
    CO Meeting Organizer EPSC2020 https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EPSC2020/EPSC2020-767.html Europlanet Science Congress 2020 Virtual meeting 21 September – 9 October 2020 EPSC2020-767 EPSC Abstracts Vol.14, EPSC2020-767, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2020-767 Europlanet Science Congress 2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Survey of Irregular Jovian Moons with IVO Tilmann Denk 1, Alfred McEwen2, Jörn Helbert 1, and the IVO Team3 1DLR (German Aerospace Center), Berlin 2LPL, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 3JHU/APL and others The Io Volcano Observer (IVO) [1] is a NASA Discovery mission currently under Phase A study [2]. Its primary goal is a thorough investigation of Io (e.g., [3]), the innermost of Jupiter's Galilean moons and the most volcanically active body in the Solar system. The 1 von 7 27.11.2020, 13:04 CO Meeting Organizer EPSC2020 https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EPSC2020/EPSC2020-767.html strategy consists of the observation of Io mainly during ten targeted flybys [4] between August 2033 and April 2037. At this time, IVO will orbit Jupiter on highly eccentric orbits with periods between 78 and 260 days, a minimum Jupiter altitude of ~340000 km, apoapsis distances between 10 and 23 million kilometers, and an orbit inclination of ~45°. Among the remote-sensing and field-and-particle instruments, there are also a narrow-angle camera (NAC; clear aperture of ~15 cm; pixel field-of-view of 10 µrad) and an infrared mapping instrument (TMAP). The irregular moons of Jupiter [5] are a group of Solar system objects which is poorly studied.
    [Show full text]
  • A Voyage Round Saturn, Its Rings and Moons Transcript
    A voyage round Saturn, its rings and moons Transcript Date: Wednesday, 2 November 2011 - 1:00PM Location: Museum of London 2 November 2011 A Voyage Round Saturn, its Moons and Rings Professor Carolin Crawford INTRODUCTION Saturn is the most distant planet easily visible to the unaided eye, and as such it has been watched closely since prehistoric times. Its particular mystery was only unveiled when Galileo Galilei first turned his simple optical telescope to it in 1610, and immediately noticed something strange about the planet. At first he guessed that its elongated shape was due to a couple of large moons to either side of Saturn; two years later these had disappeared, only to be replaced by two arched ‘cup handles’ to the planet by 1616. It wasn’t until Christiaan Huygens was able to observe Saturn with a much improved version of a telescope in 1659 that the mystery was resolved, when he identified the two ‘handles’ as a ring encircling the planet. Huygens also discovered Saturn's largest moon, Titan. A few years later, Jean-Dominique Cassini discovered a further four moons of Saturn, and resolved the surrounding ring into a series of rings, separated by gaps – the most apparent of these gaps has since been named for him. Today we have the opportunity to scrutinise Saturn in detail, with the luxury of remote exploration by robotic spacecraft; and yet the planet and its complex system of rings and moons remains intriguing. Saturn has been visited by spacecraft only four times. Three were brief flybys: Pioneer 11 in 1979, followed by Voyagers 1 and 2 in 1980 and 1981.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Jovian Irregular Moons with Ivo (Io Volcano Observer)
    52nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2021 (LPI Contrib. No. 2548) 1841.pdf SURVEY OF JOVIAN IRREGULAR MOONS WITH IVO (IO VOLCANO OBSERVER). T. Denk1, A.S. McEwen2, J. Helbert1, and the IVO Team. 1DLR Berlin ([email protected]), 2LPL, University of Arizona. Introduction. This talk combines three different quantity. (Of course, with respect to mass, they topics: (1) A quick introduction into the IVO mission, a contribute very little to the Jovian moon system.) spacecraft proposed to orbit Jupiter in the 2030's decade Irregular moons are believed to be remnants from [1][2]; (2) Jupiter is host of at least 71, and likely many catastrophic collisions of progenitor objects suspected hundred [3] outer, so-called irregular moons with a size to have been trapped by Jupiter in the early history of >1 km which are poorly explored so far; (3) the Cassini the Solar system. Many details and characteristics, spacecraft performed an observation campaign of including their region of origin and their relationship to Saturn's irregular moons in the 2010 decade [4]. other small bodies, are not known [8]. Cassini has proven the feasibility and strong The Cassini observation potentials of irregular-moon observations by spacecraft campaign of Saturn's irregular orbiting the center planet of irregular moons. Such a moons was the first irregular-moon campaign is thus proposed as part of the Science inventory by a spacecraft orbiting Enhancement Option (SEO) "Jupiter system science" of the host planet [4][9]. Especially in the IVO mission. the second half of the mission, IVO (Io Volcano Observer) is approximately one or two days per a NASA Discovery mission cur- orbit were used to observe Saturn's irregular moons, rently under Phase A study.
    [Show full text]
  • Cassini Mission Science Report – ISS
    Volume 1: Cassini Mission Science Report – ISS Carolyn Porco, Robert West, John Barbara, Nicolas Cooper, Anthony Del Genio, Tilmann Denk, Luke Dones, Michael Evans, Matthew Hedman, Paul Helfenstein, Andrew Ingersoll, Robert Jacobson, Alfred McEwen, Carl Murray, Jason Perry, Thomas Roatsch, Peter Thomas, Matthew Tiscareno, Elizabeth Turtle Table of Contents Executive Summary ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 1 ISS Instrument Summary …………………………………………………………………………… 2 2 Key Objectives for ISS Instrument ……………………………………………………………… 4 3 ISS Science Assessment …………………………………………………………………………….. 6 4 ISS Saturn System Science Results …………………………………………………………….. 9 4.1 Titan ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 9 4.2 Enceladus ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 11 4 3 Main Icy Satellites ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 16 4.4 Satellite Orbits & Orbital Evolution…………………………………………………….……………………. 21 4.5 Small Satellites ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 22 4.6 Phoebe and the Irregular Satellites ………………………………………………………………………… 23 4.7 Saturn ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 25 4.8 Rings ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28 4.9 Open Questions for Saturn System Science ……………………………………………………………… 33 5 ISS Non-Saturn Science Results …………………………………………………………………. 41 5.1 Jupiter Atmosphere and Rings………………………………………………………………………………… 41 5.2 Jupiter/Exoplanet Studies ………………………………………………………………………………………. 43 5.3 Jupiter Satellites………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 43 5.4 Open Questions for Non-Saturn Science ………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Planets Solar System Paper Contents
    Planets Solar system paper Contents 1 Jupiter 1 1.1 Structure ............................................... 1 1.1.1 Composition ......................................... 1 1.1.2 Mass and size ......................................... 2 1.1.3 Internal structure ....................................... 2 1.2 Atmosphere .............................................. 3 1.2.1 Cloud layers ......................................... 3 1.2.2 Great Red Spot and other vortices .............................. 4 1.3 Planetary rings ............................................ 4 1.4 Magnetosphere ............................................ 5 1.5 Orbit and rotation ........................................... 5 1.6 Observation .............................................. 6 1.7 Research and exploration ....................................... 6 1.7.1 Pre-telescopic research .................................... 6 1.7.2 Ground-based telescope research ............................... 7 1.7.3 Radiotelescope research ................................... 8 1.7.4 Exploration with space probes ................................ 8 1.8 Moons ................................................. 9 1.8.1 Galilean moons ........................................ 10 1.8.2 Classification of moons .................................... 10 1.9 Interaction with the Solar System ................................... 10 1.9.1 Impacts ............................................ 11 1.10 Possibility of life ........................................... 12 1.11 Mythology .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Red Material on the Large Moons of Uranus: Dust from the Irregular Satellites?
    Red material on the large moons of Uranus: Dust from the irregular satellites? Richard J. Cartwright1, Joshua P. Emery2, Noemi Pinilla-Alonso3, Michael P. Lucas2, Andy S. Rivkin4, and David E. Trilling5. 1Carl Sagan Center, SETI Institute; 2University of Tennessee; 3University of Central Florida; 4John Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory; 5Northern Arizona University. Abstract The large and tidally-locked “classical” moons of Uranus display longitudinal and planetocentric trends in their surface compositions. Spectrally red material has been detected primarily on the leading hemispheres of the outer moons, Titania and Oberon. Furthermore, detected H2O ice bands are stronger on the leading hemispheres of the classical satellites, and the leading/trailing asymmetry in H2O ice band strengths decreases with distance from Uranus. We hypothesize that the observed distribution of red material and trends in H2O ice band strengths results from infalling dust from Uranus’ irregular satellites. These dust particles migrate inward on slowly decaying orbits, eventually reaching the classical satellite zone, where they collide primarily with the outer moons. The latitudinal distribution of dust swept up by these moons should be fairly even across their southern and northern hemispheres. However, red material has only been detected over the southern hemispheres of these moons, during the Voyager 2 flyby of the Uranian system (subsolar latitude ~81ºS). Consequently, to test whether irregular satellite dust impacts drive the observed enhancement in reddening, we have gathered new ground-based data of the now observable northern hemispheres of these moons (sub-observer latitudes ~17 – 35ºN). Our results and analyses indicate that longitudinal and planetocentric trends in reddening and H2O ice band strengths are broadly consistent across both southern and northern latitudes of these moons, thereby supporting our hypothesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transits of Extrasolar Planets with Moons
    The Transits of Extrasolar Planets with Moons David Mathew Kipping arXiv:1105.3189v3 [astro-ph.EP] 23 Apr 2012 Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Physics and Astronomy University College London March 2011 I, David Mathew Kipping, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Abstract The search for extrasolar planets is strongly motivated by the goal of characterizing how frequent habitable worlds and life may be within the Galaxy. Whilst much effort has been spent on searching for Earth-like planets, large moons may also be common, temperate abodes for life as well. The methods to detect extrasolar moons, or “exomoons” are more subtle than their planetary counterparts and in this thesis I aim to provide a method to find such bodies in transiting systems, which offer the greatest potential for detection. Before one can search for the tiny perturbations to the planetary signal, an understanding of the planetary transit must be established. Therefore, in Chapters 3 to 5 I discuss the transit model and provide several new insights. Chapter 4 presents new analytic expressions for the times of transit minima and the transit duration, which will be critical in the later search for exomoons. Chapter 5 discusses two sources of distortion to the transit signal, namely blending (with a focus on the previously unconsidered self-blending scenario) and light curve smearing due to long integration times. I provide methods to compensate for both of these effects, thus permitting for the accurate modelling of the planetary transit light curve.
    [Show full text]
  • Moons of the Solar System Lithograph
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Triton Dione Tethys Iapetus Mimas Rhea Enceladus Titan Earth’s Moon Earth Europa Titania Miranda Oberon Callisto Io Charon Ganymede Moons of the Solar System www.nasa.gov Moons — also called satellites — come in many shapes, sizes, Saturn’s moon Titan, the second largest in the solar system, is SIGNIFICANT DATES and types. They are generally solid bodies, and few have atmo- the only moon with a thick atmosphere. 1610 — Galileo Galilei and Simon Marius independently discover spheres. Most of the planetary moons probably formed from the Beyond Saturn, Uranus has 27 known moons. The inner moons four moons orbiting Jupiter. Galileo is credited and the moons discs of gas and dust circulating around planets in the early solar appear to be about half water ice and half rock. Miranda is the are called “Galilean.” This discovery changed the way the solar system. Some moons are large enough for their gravity to cause most unusual; its chopped-up appearance shows the scars of system was perceived. them to be spherical, while smaller moons appear to be cap- impacts of large rocky bodies. Neptune’s moon Triton is as big 1877 — Asaph Hall discovers Mars’ moons Phobos and Deimos. tured asteroids, not related to the formation and evolution of the as the dwarf planet Pluto, and orbits backwards compared with 1969 — Astronaut Neil Armstrong is the first of 12 humans to body they orbit. The International Astronomical Union lists 146 Neptune’s direction of rotation. Neptune has 13 known moons walk on the surface of Earth’s Moon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Irregular Satellites of Saturn
    Denk T., Mottola S., Tosi F., Bottke W. F., and Hamilton D. P. (2018) The irregular satellites of Saturn. In Enceladus and the Icy Moons of Saturn (P. M. Schenk et al., eds.), pp. 409–434. Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, DOI: 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816537075-ch020. The Irregular Satellites of Saturn Tilmann Denk Freie Universität Berlin Stefano Mottola Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Federico Tosi Istituto di Astrofsica e Planetologia Spaziali William F. Bottke Southwest Research Institute Douglas P. Hamilton University of Maryland, College Park With 38 known members, the outer or irregular moons constitute the largest group of sat- ellites in the saturnian system. All but exceptionally big Phoebe were discovered between the years 2000 and 2007. Observations from the ground and from near-Earth space constrained the orbits and revealed their approximate sizes (~4 to ~40 km), low visible albedos (likely below ~0.1), and large variety of colors (slightly bluish to medium-reddish). These fndings suggest the existence of satellite dynamical families, indicative of collisional evolution and common progenitors. Observations with the Cassini spacecraft allowed lightcurves to be obtained that helped determine rotational periods, coarse shape models, pole-axis orientations, possible global color variations over their surfaces, and other basic properties of the irregulars. Among the 25 measured moons, the fastest period is 5.45 h. This is much slower than the disruption rotation barrier of asteroids, indicating that the outer moons may have rather low densities, possibly as low as comets. Likely non-random correlations were found between the ranges to Saturn, orbit directions, object sizes, and rotation periods.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of Exomoons David M
    In Search of Exomoons † David M. Kipping∗ Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA, USA E-mail: [email protected] Two decades ago, astronomers began detecting planets orbiting stars other than our Sun, so-called exoplanets. Since that time, the rate of detections and the sensitivity to ever-smaller planets has improved dramatically with several Earth-sized planets now known. As our sensitivity dives into the terrestrial regime, increasingly the community has wondered if the moons of exoplanets may also be detectable, so-called “exomoons”. Their detection represents an outstanding challenge in modern astronomy and would provide deep insights into the uniqueness of our Solar System and perhaps even expand the definition of habitability. Here, I will briefly review theoretical studies exploring the formation and evolution of exomoons, which serve to guide observational searches and provide testable hypotheses. Next, I will outline the different methods which have been proposed to accomplish this challenging feat and their respective merits. Finally, initial results from observational efforts will be summarized with a view to future prospects as well. arXiv:1405.1455v1 [astro-ph.EP] 6 May 2014 Frank N. Bash Symposium 2013: New Horizons in Astronomy (BASH 2013) October 6-8, 2013 Austin, Texas ∗Speaker. †NASA Carl Sagan Fellow. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/ In Search of Exomoons David M. Kipping 1. INTRODUCTION Within the field of astronomy, there are few areas of research which have enjoyed as much public enthusiasm and rapid rates of discovery than that of exoplanetary science - a research area which was not even established until two decades ago.
    [Show full text]