DOCSLIB.ORG

∀¬Α ≠ ∀¬Α - Given That the Statement Is Composed by an a Priori True Value and a Non-Identical, Pragmatic Contingent Value

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
∀¬Α ≠ ∀¬Α - Given That the Statement Is Composed by an a Priori True Value and a Non-Identical, Pragmatic Contingent Value ti< 1.1 (Spring 2012) 122 At first sight, this text is not directly related to my book Lite Sweat Crude. In the book I was concerned about language structure, comprehension and how to generate new semantic objects using a distorted and fuzzy writing strategy. Well, the same content is developed below, though it has a more formal, academical approach. It’s a brief explanation about the EzraPounding/MerrillLynchyng method to generate critical and balanced systems of conflicted knowledge, based in a ruleset of self-generated contradictions. It’s a work & progress, hope you enjoy. Marcio Lana-Lopez, 2012 EzraPounding/MerrillLynching EzraPounding/MerrillLynching (ΣΡΜΓ) is a coercive system that describes and regulates states of contradiction in a given alogical identity statement - i.e. ∀¬α ≠ ∀¬α - given that the statement is composed by an a priori true value and a non-identical, pragmatic contingent value. Its regulatory set is commonly used to establish, evaluate and develop principles of fuzziness in the fields of Linguistics, Conflict Theory, Unconventional Economics, Political Easing, Non Behavioral Biology, Soft/Flex Computing and Astronomy. Historical Background The main assertions of ΣΡΜΓ can be roughly traced to Aristotle’s Organon . The problem of future contingents and the contradictory solutions to the proposition/judgement binary presented on Perihermenias relates at some extent to the core hypothesis of alogical apprehension on ΣΡΜΓ introductory correlata. Nonetheless, a coercive system is not implemented within the logical treatise. It is also important to remark the strong variations between the texts compiled by Aristotle’s followers Andronicus of Rhodes and Phaenias of Eresus (apocrypha). Italian mathematician and astronomer Giacomo Scampini (1725-1803) was the first to develop a abbreviated instance of an alogical system of conflicted pragmatism. In his work Topica Contradictio in Ratio Ulteriorea , Scampini demonstrated that: “ (...) ad aliquid a priori iudicium contradictorium valorem, potest profecto simili alogical moribus construi natura. In non identitatem sic constituentis indistinctum veritatem inter variabilis cogitatio et sua entia cogitationis. Ad hoc, aequivocum principium contigent identitas evolvit in systema dissentientibus et caliginosus speculatio. Quamquam improviso, hoc identitatem constituit necessarium et invariabilis causa non identitatem intra verum contradictoria ratio. Symbolica munus ratio est unice elementum essentiale quod definit et demonstrat actualitatem alogical processus PRAGMATICUS incertum. “1 ti< 1.1 (Spring 2012) 123 Bertrand Russell contribution to the alogical hypothesis of ΣΡΜΓ is still disputed. Principia Mathematica does not mention coercive propositions neither alogical processes. The “teabag notebook” contains a brief section on pragmatic arguments and unlogical rejected experience (the hippocampus’ dilemma), but the authenticity of it is questioned by several scholars. Contemporary variations and correlata ΣΡΜΓ was defined as a categorical method of alogical analysis in the 1920s. The first compendium of ΣΡΜΓ unstructured theory was organized and published by hungarian economist and mathematician Johannes Grieg-Kliszko, and is known as the First Correlata. This initial unstructure will be subsequently adapted to distinct modus operandi or research fields: 2nd Correlata (1932): Includes the political writings and commentaries of the Group of Genova; in the Historical Tabula, the corpus of Economica Utopica is added. 1st Variation 2 nd Correlata (1935): contradictions in Economica Utopica and the Kliszko foreword of the 2 nd Correlata are added after further pragmatic revision. 2nd Variation 2 nd Correlata (1938): further conflicts inside the original text are generated through coercive analysys (Mallbaum, Kahn & Hoffmeister). First attempt to produce a generalized system of refutable identity applicable to knowledge categories. Historical Tabula includes Sextus Empiricus’ Psychologica Uncertitate (apocrypha) and Miguel de Montalban’s Astrologicus Corollarium sublimis Caelestis obiecta 3rd Correlata (1957): major modifications in the alogical core. Coercive analysis are now exponential, contradictions are generated by a soft pragmatic interpretative loop (SPRILO). Economics contradictions are reinforced, unconventional behavior streamlined to a fuzzy ruleset. Conflicted Praxeology from the Austrian School is included in the Historical Tabula. N Variations 3 rd Correlata (1971): SPRILO automatically generated 256 Variations from the 3 rd Correlata. Minor (simultaneous) additions to the alogical core. Evolutionary unstructures supports the inclusion of new research fields, Political Easing pragmatic discourse generates infinitesimal contradiction nods. 4th Correlata (1992): First electronic edition of ΣΡΜΓ. Unstructure is more flexible and the alogical core acts as regenerative model of contradictory data. Soft/Flex computing are paired, FLE2COS (Flexible Coercive Conflicted System) replaces SPRILO. All european non-fiction romantic literature are included in the Historical Tabula. ti< 1.1 (Spring 2012) 124 The 4 th Correlata does not vary. The contradictions spontaneously generated by FLE2COS pragmatic system of non-identity will be added to the actual compendia. In this sense, ΣΡΜΓ and its variations are non-entropic formulæ and purely infinite, constantly multiplicating itself, ex falso aeterna quodlibet. There is no timetable for the EzraPounding/MerrillLynching 5th Correlata. 1(...) at any a priori reasoning of contradictory value, one can certainly find a similar alogical behavior of constructed nature. The non identity thus establishes the indistinguishable truth between the variable thought and its own entities of thought. Ad hoc, an equivocal principle of contingent identity evolves into a system of conflicted and fuzzy speculation. Though unexpected, this identity constitutes a necessary and invariable cause of non identity within a true contradictory argument. The symbolic function of the argument is the solely essential element that defines and demonstrates the actuality of the alogical process of pragmatic uncertainty. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UT CV 17 Fall
    STEPHEN A. WHITE: Curriculum Vitae (August 2017) Department of Classics Office: 512-475-7457 University of Texas at Austin [email protected] 2210 Speedway, C3400 Austin, Texas 78712-1738 Academic Appointments University of Texas at Austin: Department of Classics Professor: 2005-date. Associate Professor: 1995-2005. Assistant Professor: 1988-1995. Department Chair: 2007-13. Director, Joint Classics and Philosophy Graduate Program in Ancient Philosophy: 1996-2015. Courtesy appointment and GSC in Department of Philosophy: 1988-date. Carleton College: Department of Classics. Assistant Professor: 1987-1988. Academic Training Ph.D. Classics University of California, Berkeley 1987 M.A. Classics University of Illinois, Urbana l980 B.A. Philosophy University of Illinois, Urbana l978 Monographs 1. Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers, translation with introduction and notes (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge forthcoming). 2. Sovereign Virtue: Aristotle on the Relation Between Prosperity and Happiness (Stanford University Press: Stanford 1992). Reviews: A. Curran, International Studies in Philosophy (1995) 143-4; P. Donini, Phronesis 39 (1994) 98-110; M.G. Lee, Canadian Philosophical Reviews (1993) 279-82; G. Lesses, Ethics 104 (1993) 402-3; R. Polansky, Review of Metaphysics 47 (1993) 397-9; N. Sherman, Philosophical Review 103 (1994) 178-81; C.C.W. Taylor, Ancient Philosophy 15 (1995) 228-32. Edited volumes 1. Aristo of Ceos: Text, Translation, and Discussion = Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, vol. 13, co-editor with W.W. Fortenbaugh (Transaction: New Brunswick 2006). Reviews: H. Cullyer, Journal of Hellenic Studies 127 (2007) 251-2; D. Lefebvre, Philosophie antique 10 (2010) 287-90; I. Volt, Göttinger Forum für Altertumswissenschaft 9 (2006) 1083-95.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Word Index
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-76517-6 - Galen: Psychological Writings Edited by P. N. Singer Index More information Greek word index Comprehensive word indexes are available in the modern editions of the Greek texts translated in this volume (though in the case of Capacities of the Soul, only in the recent edition of Bazou, not in that of Müller). The present index contains a selection of terms with their translations, referenced by page and line numbers of the edition used, and is intended to be of help in finding both the translation and the occurrences of technical or otherwise interesting terminology. For certain very commonly used terms (e.g. agathos, anthrōpos, psuchē), where no problem of translation arises, only a few passages are given by way of example; for terms of particular importance to the argument of the texts, most or all occur- rences have been listed. Compound verbs are listed under the main verbal form and adverbs under the corresponding adjective. ἀγαθός good Ind. 18,19; 20,13; 21,6 QAM ἀδιανόητος incomprehensible QAM 48,18 40,22 (Hesiod); 73,14; 74,5-11; τὰ ἀγαθά ἀδικεῖν harm QAM 74,15.17 (matters of) good Aff. Pecc. Dig. 42,11-19; ἀερώδης airy (substance) QAM 45,10 44,13 (with note); τὸ ἀγαθόν the good Ind. ἀήρ air QAM 45,11.23; 66,11 20,1.4 Aff. Pecc. Dig. 42,21; 43,9 QAM 73,17; ἀθάνατος immortal QAM 36,14; 38,4; 42,14 what someone enjoys Aff. Pecc. Dig. 24,14 ἀθυμεῖν be dispirited Aff.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Synopsis of the Aristotelian Commentary Tradition (In Less Than Sixty Minutes)
    HISTORICAL SYNOPSIS OF THE ARISTOTELIAN COMMENTARY TRADITION (IN LESS THAN SIXTY MINUTES) Fred D. Miller, Jr. CHAPTER 1 PERIPATETIC SCHOLARS Aristotle of Stagira (384–322 BCE) Exoteric works: Protrepticus, On Philosophy, Eudemus, etc. Esoteric works: Categories, Physics, De Caelo, Metaphysics, De Anima, etc. The legend of Aristotle’s misappropriated works Andronicus of Rhodes: first edition of Aristotle’s works (40 BCE) Early Peripatetic commentators Boethus of Sidon (c. 75—c. 10 BCE) comm. on Categories Alexander of Aegae (1st century CE)comm. on Categories and De Caelo Adrastus of Aphrodisias (early 1st century) comm. on Categories Aspasius (c. 131) comm. on Nicomachean Ethics Emperor Marcus Aurelius establishes four chairs of philosophy in Athens: Platonic, Peripatetic, Stoic, Epicurean (c. 170) Alexander of Aphrodisias (late 2nd —early 3rd century) Extant commentaries on Prior Analytics, De Sensu, etc. Lost comm. on Physics, De Caelo, etc. Exemplar for all subsequent commentators. Comm. on Aristotle’s Metaphysics Only books 1—5 of Alexander’s comm. are genuine; books 6—14 are by ps.-Alexander . whodunit? Themistius (c. 317—c. 388) Paraphrases of Physics, De Anima, etc. Paraphrase of Metaphysics Λ (Hebrew translation) Last of the Peripatetics CHAPTER 2 NEOPLATONIC SCHOLARS Origins of Neoplatonism Ammonius Saccas (c. 175—242) forefather of Neoplatonism Plotinus (c. 205—260) the Enneads Reality explained in terms of hypostases: THE ONE—> THE INTELLECT—>WORLD SOUL—>PERCEPTIBLE WORLD Porphyry of Tyre (232–309) Life of Plotinus On the School of Plato and Aristotle Being One On the Difference Between Plato and Aristotle Isagoge (Introduction to Aristotle’s Categories) What is Neoplatonism? A broad intellectual movement based on the philosophy of Plotinus that sought to incorporate and reconcile the doctrines of Plato, Pythagoras, and Aristotle with each other and with the universal beliefs and practices of popular religion (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter Nicgorski: Cicero on Aristotle and Aristotelians 35 and the Teachings of the Peripatetic School Founded by Aristotle
    WALTER NICGORSKI Cicero on Aristotle and Aristotelians ABSTRACT: Set against tendencies in the Renaissance and later political theory to see Cicero in tension with Aristotle, this research essay reports the results of a close study of all of Cicero’s texts that bear on his reading, understanding and assessment of Aristotle and the Peripatetic school. The essay necessarily attends to Cicero’s sources for his encoun- ter with Aristotle and affirms, with some qualifications, Cicero’s overall continuity with the moral and political thought of Aristotle. KEYWORDS: Aristotle, Cicero, Socrates, Theophrastus, Peripatetic, New Academy, Rhetoric, Stoic, Dialogues, Virtue, Equality, Petrarch. [M]y philosophical writings differing very little from Peri- patetic teachings, for both I and those men wish to follow in the Socratic and Platonic tradition… (Cicero, De Officiis I. 2) cicero was rome’s “best Aristotelian”. (dante)1 The authority of the American Declaration of Independen- ce rests in part on its drawing from “elementary books of public right as Aristotle, Cicero, Locke, Sidney, etc.” (Tho- mas Jefferson, 1824/1973. 12) This research essay provides the basis, in cicero’s own writings, to see his moral and political thinking as a significant Roman manifestation of political Aristo- telianism. It examines closely his assessment of Aristotle’s political legacy and the necessary preliminary topic of cicero’s sources for understanding Aristotle 1 This was dante’s judgement according to A. E. Douglas (1965, 162) and Paul Renucci (1954, 331). A seemingly different claim made by the 20th century scholar Ernest Fortin (1996, 33) was that cicero and Varro are “Plato’s roman disciples.” WALTER NICGORSKI: CICERO ON ARISTOTLE AND ARISTOTELIANS 35 and the teachings of the Peripatetic school founded by Aristotle.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on the Ancient Catalogues of Aristotle's Works
    Studies on the Ancient Catalogues of Aristotle's Works https://www.ontology.co/biblio/corpus-aristotelicum-biblio-two.htm Theory and History of Ontology by Raul Corazzon | e-mail: [email protected] Bibliography on the Ancient Catalogues of Aristotle's Writings and the Rediscovery of the Corpus Aristotelicum ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE STUDIES IN ENGLISH 1 di 22 28/03/2017 11:57 Studies on the Ancient Catalogues of Aristotle's Works https://www.ontology.co/biblio/corpus-aristotelicum-biblio-two.htm ENGLISH See also: The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers by Diogenes Laërtius. A Bibliography 1. Barnes, Jonathan. 1997. "Roman Aristotle." In Philosophia Togata Ii. Plato and Aristotle at Rome, edited by Barnes, Jonathan and Griffin, Miriam, 1-69. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Reprinted in: Gregory Nagy (ed.), Greek Literature in the Roman Period and in Late Antiquity, New York, Routledge, 2001 pp. 119-187; revised edition in J. Barnes, Mantissa: Essays in Ancient Philosophy IV, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2015, pp. 407-478. "When Theophrastus died, his library, which included the library of Aristotle, was carried off to the Troad. His successors found nothing much to read; the Lyceum sank into a decline; and Peripatetic ideas had little influence on the course of Hellenistic philosophy. It was only with the rediscovery of the library that Aristotelianism revived — and it revived in Italy. For the library went from the Troad to Athens — and thence, as part of Sulla’s war-booty, to Rome. There Andronicus of Rhodes produced the ‘Roman edition’ of the corpus Aristotelicum. It was the first complete and systematic version of Aristotle’s works, the first publication in their full form of the technical treatises, the first genuinely critical edition of the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Space in Hellenistic Philosophy
    Graziano Ranocchia, Christoph Helmig, Christoph Horn (Eds.) Space in Hellenistic Philosophy Space in Hellenistic Philosophy Critical Studies in Ancient Physics Edited by Graziano Ranocchia Christoph Helmig Christoph Horn ISBN 978-3-11-036495-8 e-ISBN 978-3-11-036585-6 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2014 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Acknowledgements This volume has been published with the financial support of the European Research Council (ERC) and the National Research Council of Italy (CNR). Thanks are due to Aurora Corti for her editorial work and to Sergio Knipe for the linguis- tic revision of the manuscript. Table of Contents Abbreviations IX Introduction 1 Keimpe Algra Aristotle’s Conception of Place and its Reception in the Hellenistic Period 11 Michele Alessandrelli Aspects and Problems of Chrysippus’ Conception of Space 53 Teun Tieleman Posidonius on the Void. A Controversial Case of Divergence Revisited 69 David Konstan Epicurus on the Void 83 Holger Essler Space and Movement in Philodemus’ De dis 3: an Anti-Aristotelian Account 101 Carlos Lévy Roman Philosophy under
    [Show full text]
  • Brill's Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, Leiden-Boston
    ANDREA FALCON (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2016, xvi+512 pp., ISBN 978-90-04- 26647-6 (hardback), 978-90-04-31540-2 (e-book). A common contemporary understanding of Aristotle–but one that extends back at least to Dante’s characterization of him as ‘il maestro di color che sanno’–is summarized by the eminent mid-twentieth-century historian of philosophy John Herman Randall, Jr.: remain[ing] the aloof, impartial observer, not deeply implicated in the struggles of that [Greek] world, . his great aim in life was to understand. His crabbed documents exhibit. the passionate search for passionless truth. There is in him a tremendous energy, an indefatigable industry, a sheer power of thought, that fascinates anyone who takes the trouble to understand what he is doing (John Herman Randall, Jr., Aristotle [New York: Columbia University Press], 1). Is Randall’s Aristotle the “real Aristotle”? Or must we look elsewhere? Serious study of this splendid anthology will surely lead the reader to suspect that such questions are misplaced. If ever there were a philosopher the real life of whose thought exists in the various, diverse readings of him, Aristotle must be a prime candidate. Of course, part of the reason for this situation lies in the fortune–or misfortune–of his corpus. On the one hand, there were Aristotle’s “published” works, now only extant in fragments but once famously characterized by Cicero as ‘flumen orationis aureum’ (Acad. 2.119). On the other hand, we have the ‘crabbed documents’ referred to by Randall.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 X 10.Three Lines .P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-71185-2 - Peripatetic Philosophy 200 BC to AD 200: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation Robert W. Sharples Excerpt More information Introduction This Introduction and the chronological table that follows it are intended to give readers who may not be familiar with this period of Peripatetic philosophy a guide to the major trends and developments, and to introduce some of the philosophers who will be considered in the following pages. The actual ancient evidence relating to some of the identifications and dates will be found below in Chapter 1, ‘People’. Aristotle’s school, the Lyceum, has been regarded both in antiquity and by modern scholars as entering a period of decline after its third head, Strato. This impression may in part be the result of tendentious representa- 1 tion in the ancient evidence, but in so far as it is accurate, the fundamental reason for the decline seems to be, not that Aristotle’s works were no longer available (below, 2), but that the Lyceum had never had an agenda that was philosophical in the narrow sense of that term predominant in antiquity, as promoting a way of life and an attitude towards its events. From Aristotle himself onwards, the concern of the school had largely been with the collecting and analysis of information on a wide range of topics, and it thus suffered from the double disadvantage that, on the one hand, it did not have such a clear evangelical message to propound as did the Epicureans or the Stoics (for the message of Nicomachean Ethics 10, that the highest human activity is theoretical study for its own sake, was probably of no wider appeal in antiquity than it is now), and, on the other, that such 2 research was being carried on elsewhere, above all in Ptolemaic Alexandria.
    [Show full text]
  • Academica, 152, 157 Aporia, 139 Caelo, 81-89; De Caelo and De Anima, Nichomachean Ethics, 100- 101 ; on Generation and Corrupti
    Index Academic skepticism. See skepticism Arab civilization, 170 Academica, 152, 157 Arcesilaus, 141-144; leader of Academic Academy, 106, 118, 161 , 165; Old, 119, skeptics, 137, 140, 141; Montaigne and 139; Plato, xix, 51 , 61 , 63 , 105, 107, epoche, 171 ; Plato's Academy, I 06; 111 , 119, 159; Third, 144----145 Strata, friendship with, 112 Aenesidemus, 141 , 144 Archelaus, 53 Aetius, xviii Aristotle, 63-102; acroamata, xix, 65; afterlife, l 0, I 32 anima, 93 , 96; atoms, 88, 91 , 116; Age of Pericles, 49, 172 belief, 98; binary combinations, doubts, agnosticism. See Cicero 109; body and thought, 96, 97; Bruno, Agrippa, 139 use of Aristotle's materialism, 171; air. See elements Christian interpolations, 70---71; Alcmaeon, 13 compared with Plato, 66-69; cycles, Alexander the Great, 63 , 65 94----95, 95, 96; De Anima, 93-100; De Alexandria, I 05 , 169; scientists, 117 Caelo, 81-89; De Caelo and De Anima, Anaxagoras, 29-34; atomism, 58; links between, 109; Democritus, Democritus, 45; homoemeria, 129; influence, 46; first mover, 76; gravity or mentioned by Aristotle, 99; mind, 33, weight, 113, 160; imagination, 97-98; 54; spiritual transcendence, 56, 84, 158; left Academy, 61 ; life, 96; logic, trial, 50, 52 Aristotlean, 147; mass in motion, 85 ; Anaximander, 4----5 ; basic matter of materialism of pre-Socratics, 55; universe, 4; cycles, 4; globe, 5; heat and Melissus, criticism of, 25, 84----85, 86; cold, 5, I 09; universe, eternal history, Metaphysics, 77- 80; motion and force, 155 31; motion of living bodies, 160; Anaximenes, 6; air, 35; change and stasis, Nichomachean Ethics, 100- 101 ; On 31 ; cycles of elements, 20; death, 132 Generation and Corruption, 89-93; Andronicus of Rhodes, 77 oral doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • From Ta Metá Ta Physiká to Metaphysics Piotr Jaroszyński
    From Ta Metá Ta Physiká to Metaphysics Piotr Jaroszyński After Aristotle’s death only his immediate successor Theophrastus raised questions that would later be called metaphysical.1 In the extant frag- ments of Theophrastus’ work we do not find talk of being as being, and the metaphysical problematic is primarily the theological problematic, be- cause it is concerned with knowing the first principles, and these principles are divine.2 When in turn Theophrastus died, the great scientific legacy of Aristotle (called the esoteric writings) vanished, and with them the books devoted to first philosophy perished. In the Lyceum they were no longer concerned with being as being or with the first principles. Only three centuries after the Stagyrite’s death was the legacy returned, primarily the esoteric writings intended for an educated reader.3 This hap- Artículo recibido el 16 de marzo de 2012 y aceptado para su publicación el 22 de abril de 2013. 1 In the oldest extant manuscripts (from the tenth century), the thoughts of Aristotle’s successor are called On the metaphysics of Theophrastus (Theophrastou ton metá ta physi- ká), Cf. Teofrast [Theophrastus], Pisma [Writings], 113, 410, note 1. Metaphys- ics. However, this title could not have come from Theophrastus. According to Ingemar Düring, the original title was The Science of What Is First (Peri ton proton theoria). Cf. Düring, Aristoteles. Darstellung und Interpretation Seines Denkes, 591. 2 “What this first intelligible substance is, or what they are, if more than one, can be revealed through (adiaporia by) analogy or some other comparison. (According to the opinion of the many or the wise,) the first principle of all is divine.
    [Show full text]
  • STEPHEN A. WHITE: Curriculum Vitae (August 2020)
    STEPHEN A. WHITE: Curriculum Vitae (August 2020) Department of Classics University of Texas at Austin 2210 Speedway, C3400 Austin, Texas 78712-1738 [email protected] Academic Appointments University of Texas at Austin: Department of Classics Assistant Professor: 1988-1995; Associate Professor: 1995-2005; Professor: 2005-date Courtesy appointment and GSC in Department of Philosophy: 1988-date Director, Joint Classics and Philosophy Graduate Program in Ancient Philosophy: 1996-2015 Carleton College: Department of Classics Assistant Professor: 1987-1988 Education Ph.D. Classics University of California, Berkeley 1987 M.A. Classics University of Illinois, Urbana l980 B.A. Philosophy University of Illinois, Urbana l978 Books authored 1. Sovereign Virtue: Aristotle on the Relation Between Prosperity and Happiness (Stanford University Press: Stanford 1992). 2. Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 2020). Books edited 1. Lyco of Troas and Hieronymus of Rhodes: Text, Translation, and Discussion = Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, vol. 12, co-editor with W.W. Fortenbaugh (Transaction: New Brunswick 2004). 2. Aristo of Ceos: Text, Translation, and Discussion = Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, vol. 13, co-editor with W.W. Fortenbaugh (Transaction: New Brunswick 2006). 3. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece and Rome, ed. M. Gagarin and E. Fantham: Area Editor for Philosophy and Science (Oxford University Press: Oxford 2009). Articles and chapters 1. “Eudemus on Parmenides and Monism” in Eudemus of Rhodes: Text, Translation, and Discussion, ed. T. Dorandi and E. Spinelli (Routledge: London, forthcoming). 2. “Clearchus of Soloi: The Sources, Text and Translation” (with Tiziano Dorandi) in Clearchus of Soloi: Text, Translation, and Discussion = RUSCH vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    420 Arctos 54 (2020) individual inscriptions. In order to !nd out about these and other details, one has, then, to browse through the relevant chapters. "is, however, may not necessarily be a bad idea. To its credit, this book is notable for its overall lack of errors. I did observe some, however. On p.119 we !nd Egatius instead of Egnatius, and there are some misspelt names in the bibliography (e.g. “Ceccioni” instead of Cecconi, p. 392). I observed a mistaken interpretation of CIL VIII 11115 on p. 139 n. 507, where the honorand, a man of equestrian rank, is said to be the patruus of the two dedicators calling themselves imperial freedmen (Augg. lib[er]t[i]). "at would be an unusual scenario; but what we read (in l.11) is in fact not patruo (dative) but patrui (nominative), and the two freedmen are the uncles of the equestrian honorand, said to be domo Ro[ma]. As he is called L. Septimius Malchio Fortun[a]tus, one can surely conclude that his father, the brother of the freedmen, had also been an imperial freedman, namely a freedman of Septimius Severus and Caracalla and that we have here another instance of an imperial freedman’s son attaining equestrian rank. "ere are also some details I wondered about, such as the point of the observation on the clientes on p. 146 (“der Rang der clientes war o#enbar immer deutlich niedriger als der des patronus”) and the use of the term “vorchristlich”, which I think normally refers to the centuries before Constantine, in (apparently) referring to the period BC (p.
    [Show full text]