Comparative Analysis of Chromosome 8 Copy Number in Paediatric Solid Tumours
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Comparative analysis of chromosome 8 copy number in paediatric solid tumours Nancy Martin La Rotta A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Molecular Oncology Group, Children’s Cancer Research Unit, Kids Research Institute, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead Discipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Sydney Medical School 2017 Copyright © All rights reserved Table of contents Statement of originality viii Acknowledgments ix Abstract xi Publications arising from this thesis, by the author xv List of abbreviations xvi List of Tables xix List of Figures xxiii Chapter 1 Literature review 1 1. Introduction 2 1.1 General introduction to childhood cancer 2 1.1.1 Classification of tumours in children 2 1.1.2 Solid tumours of childhood 6 1.1.3 Neuroblastoma 6 1.1.4 Rhabdomyosarcoma 7 1.1.5 Ewing Sarcoma 9 1.1.6 Osteosarcoma 10 1.2 Cytogenetic changes in childhood cancers - relevance to prognosis 11 1.2.1 Introduction to cytogenetic changes in cancer 11 1.2.2. Cytogenetic changes in neuroblastoma 12 i 1.2.3. Cytogenetic changes in rhabdomyosarcomas 15 1.2.4. Cytogenetic changes in Ewing sarcoma 19 1.2.5. Cytogenetic changes in osteosarcoma 22 1.2.6 Cytogenetic changes relevant to cancer therapy 25 1.3 Technical approaches to detect copy number changes in cancer 26 1.3.1 Classical cytogenetics 26 1.3.2 Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) and array CGH 30 1.3.2.1 Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) 30 1.3.2.2 Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) 31 1.3.3 Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) 34 1.3.3.1 Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) 35 1.3.3.2 MLPA and Cancer 37 1.3.3.3 Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) 40 1.4 Chromosome 8q gain in adult cancers 43 1.4.1 Breast cancer 43 1.4.2 Prostate cancer 44 1.4.3 Colorectal cancer 45 1.4.4 Human cancer cell lines 45 ii 1.5 Chromosome 8 gain in childhood cancers 46 1.5.1 Neuroblastoma 46 1.5.2 Rhabdomyosarcoma 49 1.5.3 Ewing Sarcoma 51 1.5.4 Osteosarcoma 53 1.6 Statement of the problem, hypothesis and aims of this research 55 1.6.1 Hypotheses 55 Chapter 2 Materials and Methods 57 2.1 Materials 58 2.2 Breast cell lines 59 2.3 Paediatric solid tumour cohort 59 2.4 Genomic DNA extraction from frozen tissues and cultured cells 62 2.5 Spectrophotometric and electrophoretic analysis of genomic DNA 63 2.6 Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) 63 2.6.1 MLPA reactions (day 1) 64 2.6.2 MLPA reactions (day 2) 65 2.6.3 MLPA Fragment separation and peak pattern evaluation 66 2.6.4. Data analysis 67 iii 2.7 Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) 69 2.7.1 Array description 71 2.7.2 Sample preparation 71 2.7.3 Restriction digestion of test and reference DNA samples 71 2.7.4 Labeling of test and reference DNA samples 72 2.7.5 Clean-up of labelled DNA samples 73 2.7.6 Hybridization 73 2.7.7 Post-hybridization washing and scanning 74 2.7.8 Data analysis 74 2.8 Quantitative real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) 76 2.9 Statistical Analyses 77 Chapter 3 Analysis of chromosome 8 copy number in paediatric solid tumours using MLPA 78 3.1 Introduction 79 3.2 Aims for chapter 3 83 3.3 Results 84 3.3.1 Use of known copy number changes in 6 breast cell lines, as positive controls for this paediatric tumour study. 87 iv 3.3.2 Copy number changes on chromosome 8p in the paediatric solid tumour cohort 95 3.3.3 Copy number changes on chromosome 8q and at reference genes in the paediatric tumour cohort. 98 3.3.4 Additional MLPA results 99 3.4 Discussion 114 3.4.1 Previous research examining chromosome 8 copy number using MLPA 115 3.4.2 Six Breast cell lines: included in this study as known positive controls 116 3.4.3 Chromosome 8p copy number in paediatric solid tumours 116 3.4.4 Chromosome 8q copy number in paediatric solid tumours 119 3.4.5 Technical considerations 121 Chapter 4 Analysis of copy number in paediatric solid tumours using array Comparative Genomic Hybridization 123 4.1 Introduction 124 4.2 Aims for aCGH 130 4.3 Results 131 4.3.1 Chromosome 8 copy number changes in breast cell lines 132 4.3.2 Compound plots indicating common copy number changes in paediatric solid tumours 137 v 4.3.3 Copy number changes in genes examined by MLPA on chromosome 8 in 31 solid tumours 145 4.3.4 Statistical Analysis for loci examined by MLPA 145 4.4 Discussion 155 4.4.1 Chromosome 8 copy number changes in breast cell lines 155 4.4.2 Common regions of copy number change in paediatric solid tumours 156 4.4.3 Copy number changes in chromosome 8 genes examined by MLPA in the solid tumour cohort 158 4.4.4 Limitations 160 4.4.5 Summary and conclusions 160 Chapter 5 Comparison of 3 techniques for the assessment of DNA copy number as applied to solid paediatric tumour samples and breast cell lines 162 5.1 Introduction 163 5.2 Aims 165 5.3 Results 166 5.3.1 Comparison of copy number results obtained using MLPA or aCGH across all measured chromosome 8 loci in 6 breast cell lines 167 5.3.2 Comparison of MLPA and aCGH copy number results obtained for the paediatric solid tumour cohort, according to tumour type 172 vi 5.3.3 Selection of genes for qPCR 183 5.3.4 Overview of qPCR 186 5.3.5 qPCR results 190 5.4 Discussion 192 5.5 Summary and conclusions 195 Chapter 6 General Discussion 196 6.1 Introduction 197 6.2 MLPA as a stand-alone technique for measuring copy number changes 197 6.3 aCGH results of other genes genome-wide 200 6.4 Summary of aCGH chromosome 8 results obtained for 6 breast cell lines and the solid tumour cohort for genes examined by MLPA 202 Final conclusions 206 References 207 Appendices 238 Appendix 1. Statistical analysis 239 Appendix 2. Copy number changes in cell lines 240 Appendix 3. Copy number changes in solid tumours 243 Appendix 4. Copy number status using aCGH 259 Appendix 5. Copy number categories in cell lines 263 Appendix 6. Copy number categories in solid tumours 264 vii Statement of originality The work described in this thesis was performed by Nancy Martin La Rotta, except where due acknowledgement has been made. I declare that no part of this work has been submitted previously for the purpose of obtaining any other degree at the University of Sydney or at any other institution. Nancy Martin La Rotta December 2016 viii Acknowledgments I would like to thank God who gave me the opportunity to accomplish one of my deepest yearnings of my heart, to pursue my PhD, and who provided me with the best supervisors that I ever imagine, A. Prof Jennifer Byrne and associate supervisor Dr. Greg Peters. I owe my more sincere gratitude and respect to my primary supervisor Jennifer Byrne, a great scientist and wise person in any possible way. She with their dedication and guidance always helped me to resolve my fears and uncertainties, to see problems from different angles and thus took me to solve them in absolutely impressive ways. I greatly appreciate the support of the staff from Kids Research Institute (KRI), present and past members, particularly all members of Cancer Research Unit. Dr. Yuyan Chen who always gave me her wise advise, and also to admin members, Vanita De’Souza and Janette Clarkson, thank you very much. I would like to express my immense gratitude to my associate supervisor Dr. Greg Peters for the support, his critical feedback and words of wisdom. Likewise, I would like to thank the availability and generosity from the scientists in the Cytogenetics and FISH Laboratories at The Children's Hospital at Westmead, especially Ms. Dorothy Hung, Mr. Artur Darmanian and Mr. Luke St. Heaps. ix Last but not less I would like to thank my lovely and supportive husband that was at my side from beginning to end, without his support I would not have been able to achieve what I accomplished. Finally, I want to thank my Mum who travelled from overseas few times to provide me with endless support and encouragement. Finally, I want to dedicate this work to my three kids for whom I wanted to set an example of persistence and achievement of goals in life, in the hope that they will go far beyond. This work was supported by the NHMRC scholarship and The Kids Cancer project x Abstract Chromosomal imbalances are of major significance in cancer initiation and progression. Gains of chromosome 8 in human cancer have been described by a number of authors and are amongst the most common cytogenetic events that occur. However in childhood solid tumours, few studies have examined copy number changes of specific genes on chromosome 8. Somatic genomic events have been for many years an important component of diagnosis, prognosis and therapy selection in paediatric oncology. Different techniques have been designed to identify gene dosage or copy number changes in a quantitative fashion. In this project we used Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) and quantitative PCR (qPCR).