Amcu's Heads of Argument

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Amcu's Heads of Argument IN THE MARIKANA COMMISSION OF INQUIRY (HELD IN CENTURION) AMCU’S HEADS OF ARGUMENT 2 Table of contents SECTION A – INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 5 1. “Marikana” ................................................................................................ 5 2. The conduct of various parties .................................................................. 6 SECTION B – BACKGROUND TO THE STRIKE.............................................. 14 3. Introduction ............................................................................................. 14 4. Rock Drill Operators at Lonmin were grossly underpaid ....................... 14 5. NUM was losing touch with its members at Lonmin and losing their confidence................................................................................................ 15 6. The collective bargaining structures at Lonmin were of doubtful relevance in 2012 ..................................................................................... 16 7. The Implats Trigger Strike ...................................................................... 17 8. A Perfect Storm ....................................................................................... 20 9. The Lonmin RDOs’ demand in June 2012 .............................................. 22 The approach to Da Costa: an RDO issue independent of the unions .............................................................................................. 23 Lonmin anticipated the RDO demand yet failed to plan for it ....... 24 Lonmin negotiated over wages with its RDOs ............................... 25 SECTION C – AMCU ................................................................................... 29 10. Introduction ............................................................................................. 29 11. AMCU’s response on 10 August 2012 ................................................... 29 12. AMCU’s conduct on 13 August 2012 ..................................................... 33 13. AMCU’s conduct on 14 August 2012 ..................................................... 38 14. The SAFM interview on the morning of 15 August ............................... 40 15. The first meeting with General Mpembe ................................................ 45 16. Mr Mathunjwa’s address on 15 August 2012 ......................................... 53 17. The debriefing ......................................................................................... 61 3 18. AMCU’s conduct on the morning of 16 August 2012 ............................ 66 19. Lonmin reneged on the commitment ...................................................... 78 20. Mr Mathunjwa’s first address to the strikers ........................................... 83 21. Mr Mathunjwa’s final plea to SAPS and lonmin .................................... 93 22. Mr Mathunjwa’s second address to the strikers ...................................... 99 23. Mr X’s allegations against Mr Mathunjwa ........................................... 104 SECTION D – NUM ................................................................................... 111 24. Introduction ........................................................................................... 111 25. NUM’s attitude to the RDOs’ strike ..................................................... 112 26. The assault by the NUM officials on 11 August 2012 .......................... 122 27. The consequences of NUM’s attack ...................................................... 130 28. The conduct of NUM’s top officials ..................................................... 132 29. Mr Zokwana’s criticism of AMCU ....................................................... 135 30. Conclusion on NUM ............................................................................. 138 SECTION E – LONMIN ............................................................................... 140 31. Introduction ........................................................................................... 140 32. Lonmin refused to engage the strikers in violation of its own policy, and in any event, unreasonably .................................................................... 141 The march on 10 August 2012 ...................................................... 141 Lonmin’s policy ............................................................................ 148 Lonmin’s refusal to engage with the strikers was in any event unreasonable................................................................................. 152 33. Lonmin knew who the strikers were and what their demand was ........ 154 Lonmin Witnesses own evidence ................................................... 155 The interdict .................................................................................. 155 Placards on 10 August 2012 ......................................................... 157 34. Lonmin’s Campaign of Misinformation ............................................... 158 “Faceless” strikers” ..................................................................... 158 4 “Union rivalry” ............................................................................ 160 35. Lonmin sought to create the impression that Amcu was behind the strike ............................................................................................................... 164 36. Lonmin took the position that it would only engage with the strikers through NUM ........................................................................................ 169 37. Lonmin persisted in its refusal to engage with the strikers despite being implored to do so by SAPS and even after 10 people had lost their lives ............................................................................................................... 174 38. Lonmin wanted SAPS to break the strike and lobbied and colluded with saps to achieve this ................................................................................ 177 39. Conclusion ............................................................................................. 183 SECTION D – SAPS ................................................................................... 184 40. Introduction ........................................................................................... 184 41. Scene 1................................................................................................... 184 42. Scene 2................................................................................................... 193 43. Conclusion ............................................................................................. 195 SECTION G – CONCLUSION ....................................................................... 197 44. Introduction ........................................................................................... 197 45. No adverse finding against AMCU ....................................................... 197 46. NUM – Findings and Recommendations .............................................. 198 47. LONMIN – Findings and Recommendations ....................................... 200 48. SAPS – Findings and Recommendations .............................................. 202 5 Section A – Introduction 1. “MARIKANA” 1.1 Some call it a “massacre”, others a “tragedy.” It was, in our submission, undoubtedly both. Many simply use the term “Marikana” to encapsulate the horror and the shame of the events of 16 August 2012. 1.2 In order to understand how “Marikana” happened and to assess the responsibility of the various parties in relation thereto, it is crucial to understand how and why the strike happened. Since August 2012, a number of misconceptions regarding who was on strike and why the strike happened have taken hold – at least in the mind of the public. As we will demonstrate below, the most serious of these were the result of deliberate misrepresentations perpetrated by Lonmin. 1.3 The true facts pertaining to how and why the strike happened have now been established. We begin our heads of argument by setting them out. We do so in order to separate fact from fiction and in order to lay a proper foundation for our examination of the events of 9 to 16 August 2012 and our assessment of the responsibility of the various parties in relation thereto. 1.4 A number of key background facts must be highlighted. These are: 1.4.1 The fact that Rock Drill Operators (“RDOs”) at Lonmin were grossly underpaid and had been so for some years. 6 1.4.2 The fact that Lonmin had anticipated, as a result of the unprotected industrial action that had engulfed the Impala Platinum Mine (“Implats”) earlier that year, that its RDOs would demand a wage increase. 1.4.3 The fact that Lonmin regarded the wage demand by its RDOs, when it came, “as an RDO issue independent of the trade unions.” 1.4.4 The fact that Lonmin negotiated with its RDOs over their wage demand before the strike. 1.5 As we will demonstrate below, each of these facts has important implications for the events of 9 to 16 August 2012 and for how those events should be understood. 2. THE CONDUCT OF VARIOUS PARTIES 2.1 Having established the background facts, we will proceed to examine the conduct of the relevant parties in relation to the events of 9 to 16 August 2012. 2.2 AMCU’s primary interest in the Commission’s proceedings has been to present evidence and argument which addresses the Commission’s terms of reference relating to it. However, AMCU also has an interest
Recommended publications
  • Country Guide South Africa
    Human Rights and Business Country Guide South Africa March 2015 Table of Contents How to Use this Guide .................................................................................. 3 Background & Context ................................................................................. 7 Rights Holders at Risk ........................................................................... 15 Rights Holders at Risk in the Workplace ..................................................... 15 Rights Holders at Risk in the Community ................................................... 25 Labour Standards ................................................................................. 35 Child Labour ............................................................................................... 35 Forced Labour ............................................................................................ 39 Occupational Health & Safety .................................................................... 42 Trade Unions .............................................................................................. 49 Working Conditions .................................................................................... 56 Community Impacts ............................................................................. 64 Environment ............................................................................................... 64 Land & Property ......................................................................................... 72 Revenue Transparency
    [Show full text]
  • GUE Collective Bargaining in Times of Crisis: a Case Study of South Africa
    Working Paper No. 32 International Labour Office (ILO) DIALOGUE Route des Morillons 4 CH -1211 Geneva 22 Switzerland Collective bargaining in times of crisis: Tel.: (+41 22) 799 70 35 Fax: (+41 22) 799 87 49 A case study of [email protected] www.ilo.org/dial South Africa Renee Grawitzky Industrial and Employment Relations Department (DIALOGUE) December 2011 ILO DWT for Eastern and Southern DIALOGUE Africa Working Paper No. 32 Collective bargaining in times of crisis: A case study of South Africa Renee Grawitzky Industrial and Employment Relations Department International Labour Office • Geneva ILO DWT for Eastern and Southern Africa December 2011 Copyright © International Labour Organization 2011 First published 2011 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with reproduction rights organizations may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. ILO Cataloguing in Publication Data Grawitzky, Renee Collective bargaining in times of crisis: a case study of South Africa / Renee Grawitzky ; International Labour Office, Industrial and Employment Relations Department. - Geneva: ILO, 2011 xxx p. (Working paper ; No.32) ISBN: 9789221257783 (print); 9789221257790 (web pdf) International Labour Office; Industrial and Employment Relations Dep.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifteen Year Review of Income Poverty Alleviation Programmes in the Social and Related Sectors Full Final Report
    FFIIFFTTEEEENN YYEEAARR RREEVVIIEEWW OF INNCCOOMMEE PPOOVVEERRTTYY AALLLLEEVVIIAATIIOONN PPRROOGGRRAMMMMEESS IINN TTHEE SSOOCCIIAALL AANNDD RREELLAATTEDD SSEECCTTOORRSS Irwin Friedman & Lungile Bhengu PCAS Fifteen Year Review Of Income Poverty Alleviation Programmes In The Social and Related Sectors Full Final Report Irwin Friedman1 and, Lungile Bhengu2 Published by Health Systems Trust 401 Maritime House Tel: 031 - 307 2954 Salmon Grove Fax: 031 - 304 0775 Victoria Embankment Email: [email protected] Durban 4001 Web: http://www.hst.org.za South Africa April 2008 This study was funded by GTZ on behalf of the Policy and Advisory Services Unit of the Presidency, Government of South Africa Suggested citation: Friedman I, and Bhengu L, Fifteen Year Review Of Income Poverty Alleviation Programmes In The Social and Related Sectors, Health Systems Trust; 2008 The information contained in this publication may be freely distributed and reproduced, as long as the source is acknowledged, and it is used for non- commercial purposes. Project funded by GTZ for PCAS Presidency, Government of South Africa 1 Research Director at Health Systems Trust 2 Independent consultant 1 CONTENTS Full Final Report......................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements.................................................................................................3 Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................6 Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • The Coca-Cola Company Review of Child Labour, Forced Labour and Land Rights in the South African Sugarcane Supply Chain
    THE COCA-COLA COMPANY REVIEW OF CHILD LABOUR, FORCED LABOUR AND LAND RIGHTS IN THE SOUTH AFRICAN SUGARCANE SUPPLY CHAIN TCCC Review of Child labour, Forced Labour and Land Rights in South Africa 2016 07/08/2017. Final Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................ 3 Overview of the sugar industry in South Africa................................................................... 3 Overview of findings: ........................................................................................................... 4 Child Labour ........................................................................................................................ 4 Forced Labour ..................................................................................................................... 4 Land Rights ......................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 7 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................... 8 Interview Schedule ............................................................................................................ 11 OVERVIEW OF SOUTH AFRICA’S SUGAR INDUSTRY .................................................. 13 CHILD LABOUR, FORCED LABOUR AND LAND RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA
    [Show full text]
  • The Decline of the Mining Industry and the Response of the Mining Unions
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Wits Institutional Repository on DSPACE THE DECLINE OF THE MINING INDUSTRY AND THE RESPONSE OF THE MINING UNIONS Gwede Mantashe A research report submitted to the Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Masters of Arts Johannesburg, 2008 Abstract The report examines the response of three trade unions, the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM), the United Associations of South Africa (UASA) and Solidarity – to the economic, political and social changes over the past decade in the mining industry. In particular the report is concerned with union responses to the decline in the gold mining industry. The report concludes that the NUM was conscious about the decline and developed coherent strategies for dealing with it, whereas both Solidarity and UASA did not pay attention to the decline. Instead their interventions were directed at countering the impact of legislative changes that accorded blacks the right to organise and join unions, and the competition that went with this opening. The NUM remains a social movement union which balances community and workplace struggles. It is the strongest and most influential union in the industry. It is the only union in the industry that is politically active and has a strategy that deploys and supports members as political activists. UASA is a business union relying on benefits and services to retain members. It is politically neutral with a minimum interest in the developments in communities around them. Solidarity, on the other hand, is a service union which is a hybrid of business and social movement unionism.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence Without Verdicts: a Comparative Analysis of Social
    The College of Wooster Libraries Open Works Senior Independent Study Theses 2015 Violence without Verdicts: A Comparative Analysis of Social Movements and Race Relations in the United States and South Africa Madison Swoy The College of Wooster, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://openworks.wooster.edu/independentstudy Part of the Comparative Politics Commons Recommended Citation Swoy, Madison, "Violence without Verdicts: A Comparative Analysis of Social Movements and Race Relations in the United States and South Africa" (2015). Senior Independent Study Theses. Paper 6952. https://openworks.wooster.edu/independentstudy/6952 This Senior Independent Study Thesis Exemplar is brought to you by Open Works, a service of The oC llege of Wooster Libraries. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Independent Study Theses by an authorized administrator of Open Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Copyright 2015 Madison Swoy Violence without Verdicts: A comparative analysis of social movements and race relations in the United States and South Africa By Madison Swoy An Independent Study Thesis submitted to the Department of Political Science at The College of Wooster March, 2015 in partial fulfillment of the requirements of I.S. Thesis Advisor: Eric Moskowitz Second Reader: Matthew Krain 2 3 ABSTRACT This paper explores the role that social movements play in weakening the racial hierarchies that continue to persist in contemporary United States and South Africa. A theoretical analysis of the function of social movements is followed by an historical survey of the racial hierarchies within these two countries, with particular attention paid to the countries’ respective eras of institutionalized racism characterized by the Jim Crow and Apartheid periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesis Digitales Restricciones De Uso
    UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS POLÍTICAS Y SOCIALES LA MINORÍA BLANCA EN SUDÁFRICA: CAMBIO POLÍTICO Y SOCIAL (1988-2010) T E S I S QUE PARA OBTENER EL GRADO DE LICENCIADO EN RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES PRESENTA: LEÓN ENRÍQUEZ MACIEL ASESORA: MARIE-ODETTE COLIN CUIDAD UNIVERSITARIA, 2012 UNAM – Dirección General de Bibliotecas Tesis Digitales Restricciones de uso DERECHOS RESERVADOS © PROHIBIDA SU REPRODUCCIÓN TOTAL O PARCIAL Todo el material contenido en esta tesis esta protegido por la Ley Federal del Derecho de Autor (LFDA) de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (México). El uso de imágenes, fragmentos de videos, y demás material que sea objeto de protección de los derechos de autor, será exclusivamente para fines educativos e informativos y deberá citar la fuente donde la obtuvo mencionando el autor o autores. Cualquier uso distinto como el lucro, reproducción, edición o modificación, será perseguido y sancionado por el respectivo titular de los Derechos de Autor. A Julieta, la potencia sublime There are five narratives that white people in South Africa are constructing in this time of political and social transition: -Still Colonial after All These Times -This Shouldn’t Happen to a White -Don’t think White, It’s All Right -A Whiter Shade of White -Under African Skies, White but Not Quite MELISSA STEYN AGRADECIMIENTOS La realización de la presente tesis no habría sido posible sin el significativo apoyo directo e indirecto de muchas personas que contribuyeron en los alcances y resultados de la misma. Quiero agradecer profundamente a mis padres, cuyo sustento emocional y material, siempre incondicional, me ha permitido este logro tan importante para mi vida, así como a mi hermano Isaac, espero poder corresponderles este amor.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Unions and Financial Inclusion in South Africa How Labour Unions Facilitate the Provision of Financial Services for Their Members
    Innovative Finance for Social Justice 2014 Labour unions and financial inclusion in South Africa How labour unions facilitate the provision of financial services for their members Working Paper No. 61 Doubell Chamberlain, Sandisiwe Ncube Nokwanda Mahori, Mia Thom (editorial input) Copyright © International Labour Organization 2014 First published 2014 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to the ILO Publications (Rights and Permissions), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with reproduction rights organizations may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. ISBN 978-92-2-129427-6 (print) ISBN 978-92-2-129428-3 (web pdf) First published in 2014 ILO Cataloguing in Publication Data The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed articles, studies and other contributions rests solely with their authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by the International Labour Office of the opinions expressed in them.
    [Show full text]
  • Registered Trade Unions in South Africa As for March 2011
    1 DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF LABOUR RELATIONS PRETORIA Tel: 012-309 4132/4729 Fax: 012-309 4156 Registered Trade Unions in South Africa As for March 2011 No Registration NAME OF UNION & ADDRESS Number 1. LR2/6/2/5 Amalgamated Union of Building Trade Workers of South Africa The Secretary Tel: (011) 331 1063/4/7/9 Fax: (011) 331 1078 e-mail: [email protected] Postal address: P.O. Box 5378, Johannesburg, 2000 Physical address: Intec House, 130 Marshall str, 10thFlr, Marshalltown,2001 2. LR2/6/2/6 Transport & Omnibus Workers Union (TOWU) The Secretary Tel: (021) 447 4750 / 1 /2 Fax: (021) 447 0795 e-mail: [email protected] Postal address: P.O. Box 13688, Mowbray, 7705 Physical address:Suite 309, 3rd Flr, Premier Centre, 451 Main Rd, Observatory, 7925 3. LR2/6/2/8 South African Typographical Union (SATU) The Secretary Tel: (012) 338 2222 / 2071 Fax: (012) 326 4196 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] website: www.satu.co.za Postal address: P.O. Box 1993, Pretoria, 0001 Physical address: SATU House, 3rd Floor, 166 Visagie Str, Pretoria, 0002 4. LR2/6/2/10 SASBO: The Finance Union The Secretary Tel: (011) 467-0192 Fax: (011) 467 0188/9 e-mail: [email protected] [email protected] website: www.sasbo.org.za Postal address: Private Bag X 84, Bryanston, 2021 Physical address: SASBO House, Fourmall Office Park West, Roos Road, Fourways, Johannesburg, 2055 5. LR2/6/2/19 Hospitality Industry & Allied Workers Union (HIAWU) The Secretary Tel: (031) 301-0288 Fax: (031) 301 0293 e-mail: [email protected] Postal address: P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Asc-075287668-3596-01
    Mortal Men The rise of the Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union under the leadership of Joseph Mathunjwa and the union’s move to the political left, 1998-2014 Julia Foudraine Thesis Research Master African Studies 2014 University of Leiden & African Studies Centre Leiden Dr. Harry Wels & Dr. Ineke van Kessel Photo front page: Joseph Mathunjwa during a mass meeting in the Olympia Stadium of Rustenburg, 19-01-2014. Photo by Julia Foudraine. i Table of contents Photos iv Acknowledgements v Abbreviations vi Chapter 1: Introduction 1 §1. Notes from my fieldwork 1 §2. The Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union 6 §3. Research objective and research questions 8 §4. The research field: from Rustenburg to Emalahleni 9 §5. Studying AMCU: methodological issues 10 §6. Conceptualization of the research 13 §7. Structure of the thesis 17 Chapter 2: ‘Only the Best for the Mineworker!’? A history of the establishment and growth of AMCU 19 §1. The establishment of the NUM 19 §2. The arrival of COSATU and the transition to democracy 22 §3. The arrival of splinter unions: the start of AMCU 25 §4. AMCU’s consolidation in Emalahleni 27 §5. Conquering Rustenburg 30 §6. NUM’s challenges in the new era 31 §7. Marikana 33 §8. Summary 34 Chapter 3: The president and his members 36 §1. A portrait of Joseph Mathunjwa 36 §2. Friend and foe 38 §3. AMCU’s membership base 42 §4. Faces behind the union 45 §5. Summary 50 ii Chapter 4: AMCU and its relationship with the media 52 §1. Mathunjwa versus the media 52 §2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labour Relations System and the Marikana Massacre
    DEVELOPMENT AND LABOUR MONOGRAPH SERIES The labour relations system and the Marikana massacre Report submitted to the Marikana Commission of Inquiry Working Paper THE INSTITUTE OF DEVLOPMENT AND LABOUR LAW University of Cape Town The Institute of Development and Labour Law was established through the merger of the Labour Law Unit and the Institute of Development Law. The Institute’s objectives are: To conduct and commission research into development and labour law issues in Southern Africa; To produce and disseminate publications arising out of the research undertaken; To convene conferences, seminars and workshops; To provide educational and advisory services; To establish and foster collaborative links in the region and elsewhere, and provide a reference point for policy and scholarship. The Institute adopts a “law in context” approach which properly reflects the interdisciplinary character of its work. The Development and Labour Monograph Series is an interdisciplinary forum for research and debate on development and labour issues in Southern Africa. The Institute also publishes occasional papers and reports about ongoing research as well as other types of publications. Copies of publications and further information may be obtained from The Institute of Development and Labour Law University of Cape Town Private Bag Rondebosch 7701 South Africa Tel: 27-21-650 5634 Fax: 27-21-650 5660 Email: [email protected] http://www.labourlaw.uct.ac.za Published by the Institute of Development and Labour Law University of Cape Town, 7701 Price in Southern Africa (including VAT and postage): R60.00 2 Report submitted to the Marikana Commission of Inquiry The labour relations system and the Marikana massacre Institute of Development and Labour Law University of Cape Town 7 March 2014 3 Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • AG1977-A21-11-001-Jpeg.Pdf
    i ; R Q tr. T "3 c H! r*‘l P R J G H .» ». 1 F* fc£ F S «.. J Hi Hi I— R H JD i : : R 1 T I C HI L... R F “ R R R 1 &> R s..™ T Hi In. R fc£ O F" The i dea f or t.he cade t s ca mp a i 9n 9erm i na ted i n t he schoo i. s 9r©u p shor t1 a a 11 e r t h e e n d o f t he " T r o o P s i .i u. t11 c a ro p a i 9 n „ h f t e r d i s c u s s i o n i t. w a * d e c i d e d to on1a take up the issue at the begining of 19sb tor the reason that if the camp a i 9n or i 9 i nated at the beginning o+ a schoo' year# its ramifications could extend throu9hout the aear. it was also felt that if the camp a i 9n was to ha ■>. v e sor»«e succes i t shou 1 d be ca.ref u 11 a conceP tu.a 1 i zed over a Period of time. F111hermore.. :i t was dec i ded that a camp a 19n tar9eted at t.he toel nn i 9 of the 1986 school a ear would 9i ve us time to t'or*9e t ink* with different organizations that were concerned with school militarization, ihe idea to work with these different organizations had three motivations.
    [Show full text]