2017 Third-Grade Reading/ELA Results
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
3rd Grade MAP ELA Assessment Results Carey M. Wright, Ed.D. State Superintendent of Education May 2017 3rd Grading Reading Summative Assessment Results: May 2017 A Joint Publication Division of Research of and Development • Dr. Paula Vanderford, Chief Research and Development Officer • Walt Drane, Executive Director of Student Assessment and Accountability • Vincent Segalini, Assessment Director • Richard Baliko, NAEP State Coordinator • Jennifer Robinson, MKAS2 State Coordinator Office of the Chief Academic Officer • Dr. Kim Benton, Chief Academic Officer • Dr. Nathan Oakley, Executive Director of Elementary Education and Reading • Dr. Kymyona Burk, State Literacy Director (K-12) • Dr. Tenette Smith, Director of Elementary Education and Reading • Robin Lemonis, Director of Student Intervention Services The Mississippi State Board of Education, the Mississippi Department of Education, the Mississippi School for the Arts, the Mississippi School for the Blind, the Mississippi School for the Deaf, and the Mississippi School for Mathematics and Science do not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, color, religion, national origin, age, or disability in the provision of educational programs and services or employment opportunities and benefits. The following office has been designated to handle inquiries and complaints regarding the non- discrimination policies of the above-mentioned entities: Director, Office of Human Resources Mississippi Department of Education 359 North West Street Suite 203 Jackson, Mississippi 39201 (601) 359-3511 MDE-Office of Student Assessment Page 2 of 20 May 2017 rd 3 Grade Mississippi Assessment Program English Language Arts Assessment Results Overview Explanation Standard Setting Validation and Cut Score Explanation The 3rd Grade MAP ELA Assessment sub-score will consist exclusively of the operational reading and language items from the 3rd Grade MAP ELA Assessment (reading literature, reading for information, and language). The maximum possible raw score is 48 points, which makes it worth fewer points than the 3rd Grade MAP ELA Assessment because the ELA test also includes writing tasks. The standards validation was necessary because a new assessment administered for the first time in 2015–2016 (i.e., reading and language items from the 3rd Grade MAP ELA Assessment) is being used to meet the requirements of the Mississippi Literacy-Based Promotion Act (SB2347), creating the need for a review of the Performance Level 2 and Performance Level 3 cut scores. A cut score determines which category students’ results apply: • Not Met (i.e., does not meet the readiness requirement) • Met (i.e., meets the readiness requirement) Two passing standards were determined. • Performance Level 2 will be the initial passing cut score for the 3rd Grade MAP ELA assessment. • Performance Level 3 was established for use when the Mississippi Department of Education (MDE) phases in a more rigorous passing standard in 2018-2019. Performance Level Descriptors PASS (Performance Level 2): A student who scores at Performance Level 2 or above meets the requirements of the Literacy Based Promotion Act for the 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 school years for promotion. Students who score within a close range of the cut score, however, still need additional intervention and supports in the following areas: apply phonetic analysis to decode unknown words determine story elements, the main idea, and cause/effect in literary and informational texts respond to literal comprehension questions and summarize short story selections demonstrate an understanding of a variety of informational resources by following written directions and using captions identify characters, settings, plots, and genre (e.g., literary and informational texts) recognize the author’s purpose use context clues to determine word meaning within context identify visual representations (illustrations) in informational texts recognize root words, prefixes, and suffixes MDE-Office of Student Assessment Page 3 of 20 May 2017 FAIL (Performance Level 1): A student who scores at this level or below will need additional interventions and supports. Students who score below the cut score may have a minimal understanding of the following skills: use elements of phonetic analysis to decode unknown words use sequencing, predicting, and retelling to understand literary and informational texts use signs and labels identify characters, settings (e.g., literary and informational texts) identify pictorial representations (illustrations) in informational texts MDE-Office of Student Assessment Page 4 of 20 May 2017 3rd Grade MAP ELA Assessment: Summary Results Table 1. 3rd Grade MAP ELA Assessment State Level Results Aggregate Scale Score Spring 2016 Spring 2017 Analysis Primary Administration Primary Administration Students Meeting LPBA 34,280 Test-Takers 36,057 Test Takers Requirements (87.0%) (92.0%) Students Not Meeting LBPA 5,132 Test-Takers 3,119 Test Takers Requirements (13.0%) (8%) Total Test-Takers 100% 100% Chart 1. 3rd Grade MAP ELA Assessment State Level Comparison 100% 92% 90% 87% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 13% 8% 10% 0% Spring 2016 Spring 2017 Met Not Met Table 2. 3rd Grade MAP ELA Assessment Top Ten Highest Performing Districts District Percentage of Students Passing Aberdeen School District >=95% Union County School District >=95% Choctaw County School District >=95% Houston School District >=95% Western Line School District >=95% Union Public School District >=95% Webster County School District >=95% Newton County School District >=95% Ocean Springs School District >=95% Stone County School District >=95% MDE-Office of Student Assessment Page 5 of 20 May 2017 Table 3. 3rd Grade MAP ELA Assessment District/School Pass Fail Rates Did Not Meet Met LBPA LBPA Total Test District/School Requirements Requirements Takers Aberdeen School District >=95% <=5% 112 Aberdeen Elementary School* >=95% <=5% 112 Alcorn School District 93.2% 6.8% 221 Alcorn Central Elementary School >=95% <=5% 80 Biggersville Elementary* 89.7% 10.3% 39 Kossuth Elementary School 92.2% 7.8% 102 Amite Co School District 88.9% 11.1% 81 Amite County Elementary* 88.9% 11.1% 81 Amory School District 91.6% 8.4% 131 East Amory School 91.6% 8.4% 131 Attala Co School District 89.2% 10.8% 93 Greenlee Attendance Center* >=95% <=5% 52 Long Creek Attendance Center* 78.0% 22.0% 41 Baldwyn School District 94.8% 5.2% 58 Baldwyn Elementary School 94.8% 5.2% 58 Bay St Louis Waveland School District 92.1% 7.9% 126 North Bay Elementary School 92.1% 7.9% 126 Benton Co School District 92.5% 7.5% 93 Ashland Elementary School* 88.5% 11.5% 52 Hickory Flat Attendance Center >=95% <=5% 41 Biloxi Public School District 94.6% 5.4% 520 Gorenflo Elementary School 89.7% 10.3% 107 Jeff Davis Elementary School 94.5% 5.5% 145 North Bay Elementary School >=95% <=5% 144 Popps Ferry Elementary School >=95% <=5% 124 Booneville School District 88.8% 11.2% 89 Anderson Elementary School 88.8% 11.2% 89 Brookhaven School District 87.6% 12.4% 258 Brookhaven Elementary School* 87.6% 12.4% 258 Calhoun Co School District 92.9% 7.1% 196 Bruce Elementary School >=95% <=5% 87 Calhoun City Elementary School 89.0% 11.0% 73 Vardaman Elementary School 94.4% 5.6% 36 Canton Public School District 87.7% 12.3% 308 Canton Elementary School* 88.7% 11.3% 159 Jimmie M. Goodloe Elementary School* 84.7% 15.3% 72 Reuben B. Myers Canton School Of Arts* 88.3% 11.7% 77 Carroll County School District 89.9% 10.1% 79 Marshall Elementary School 89.9% 10.1% 79 MDE-Office of Student Assessment Page 6 of 20 May 2017 Did Not Meet Met LBPA LBPA Total Test District/School Requirements Requirements Takers Chickasaw Co School District 92.9% 7.1% 42 Houlka Attendance Center 92.9% 7.1% 42 Choctaw Co School District >=95% <=5% 114 Ackerman Elem >=95% <=5% 62 French Camp Elem School >=95% <=5% 23 Weir Elementary School >=95% <=5% 29 Claiborne Co School District 89.6% 10.4% 115 Arthur W Watson Jr Elementary School 89.6% 10.4% 115 Clarksdale Municipal School District 87.0% 13.0% 238 Booker T Washington Intern. Studies* 83.6% 16.4% 55 Geo H Oliver Visual and Perf. Arts* 81.1% 18.9% 74 Heidelberg School Math and Science* 92.6% 7.4% 54 Kirkpatrick Health and Wellness* 92.7% 7.3% 55 Cleveland School District 90.2% 9.8% 297 Bell Elementary School 91.1% 8.9% 45 Cypress Park Elementary School* 87.5% 12.5% 104 Hayes Cooper Center For Math Sc Tec >=95% <=5% 40 Parks Elementary School* 91.3% 8.7% 46 Pearman Elementary School* 90.3% 9.7% 62 Clinton Public School District >=95% <=5% 425 Northside Elem >=95% <=5% 425 Coahoma County School District 93.0% 7.0% 129 Friars Point Elementary School* 89.5% 10.5% 19 Jonestown Elementary School 91.4% 8.6% 35 Lyon Elementary School 93.5% 6.5% 46 Sherard Elementary School >=95% <=5% 29 Coffeeville School District 82.6% 17.4% 46 Coffeeville Elementary School* 82.6% 17.4% 46 Columbia School District >=95% <=5% 138 Columbia Primary School >=95% <=5% 138 Columbus Municipal School District 86.1% 13.9% 374 Cook Elementary School* 82.7% 17.3% 104 Fairview Elementary School* 93.8% 6.3% 48 Franklin Academy* 82.8% 17.2% 64 Sale Elementary School 82.4% 17.6% 68 Stokes Beard Elementary School* 91.1% 8.9% 90 Copiah Co School District 90.0% 10.0% 230 Crystal Springs Elementary* 91.7% 8.3% 145 Wesson Attendance Center 87.1% 12.9% 85 Covington Co Schools 91.1% 8.9% 236 MDE-Office of Student Assessment Page 7 of 20 May 2017 Did Not Meet Met LBPA LBPA Total Test District/School Requirements Requirements Takers Collins Elementary* 88.9% 11.1% 63 Hopewell Elementary School*