Tribuni Plebis and the End of the Roman Republic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tribuni Plebis and the End of the Roman Republic Promotor Prof. Dr. Andries Johan Zuiderhoek Vakgroep Geschiedenis Decaan Prof. dr. Marc Boone Rector Prof. dr. Anne De Paepe Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Loonis Logghe The tribuni plebis and the end of the Roman Republic Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in Geschiedenis 2016 List of Abbreviations C Clark, Albert Curtis, ed. Q. Asconii Pediani orationum Ciceronis quinque enarratio. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1907. CIL Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum, 17 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1853-. F Flemisch, Michael, ed. Grani Liciniani quae supersunt. Leipzig: Teubner, 1904. FGrH Jacoby, Felix, ed. Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker, 19 vols. Berlin: Weidmann, 1923-26; Leiden: Brill, 1940-99. ILS Dessau, Hermann, ed. Inscriptiones Latinae Selecae, 3 vols. Berlin: Weidmann, 1892-1916. Inscr. It. Degrassi, Attilio, ed. Inscriptiones Italiae, 13 vols. Rome: Libreria dello Stato, 1937-86. MRR Broughton, T. Robert S. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, 3 vols. New York: American Philological Association, 1951- 86. RE Wissowa, Georg et alii, eds. Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, 34 vols., 15 suppls. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 1894-1980. RRC Crawford, Michael H. Roman Republican Coinage, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974. Stangl Stangl, Thomas, ed. Ciceronis Orationum Scholiastae. Leipzig: Freitag, 1912. v List of Figures Figure 1 Simplified schematic representation of contention ...................................... 38 vii Table of Contents Introduction 1 The tribuni plebis and the end of the Roman Republic ........................................................ 1 Status quaestionis ................................................................................................................... 10 Sources ..................................................................................................................................... 24 The structure of this work .................................................................................................... 28 Chapter 1 Theoretic framework .................................................................................... 29 1.1 Structured agency and contention ............................................................................ 30 1.1.1 A theory of structure and agency .................................................................. 30 1.1.2 Primary contention .......................................................................................... 33 1.1.3 Secondary contention ...................................................................................... 34 1.2 More concepts: societal groups, interests, and ‘contention costs’ ........................ 39 1.2.1 Societal groups: collective agency, choice, differentiation, ideology ...... 39 1.2.2 Interests and desires ........................................................................................ 42 1.2.3 The ‘costs’ of contention ................................................................................. 43 1.3 Politics ............................................................................................................................ 44 1.3.1 Central governmental institutions ................................................................ 44 1.3.2 Politics and society ........................................................................................... 45 1.3.3 Contentious politics ......................................................................................... 47 1.4 Positioning the tribunate ............................................................................................ 51 Chapter 2 Societal Groups in the late Republic: demographic, economic, and social structures ............................................................................................ 55 2.1 General demography and economy of Italy ............................................................. 56 2.1.1 Demographic evolutions ................................................................................. 56 2.1.2 Development of the economy ......................................................................... 61 2.2 Societal groups .............................................................................................................. 66 2.2.1 Legal status ........................................................................................................ 66 2.2.2 Sex ....................................................................................................................... 75 2.2.3 Socio-economic factors ................................................................................... 76 2.2.4 Geography and culture .................................................................................... 90 Chapter 3 Politics and the tribunate in the late Republic: general considerations ............................................................................................... 95 ix 3.1 Political groups ............................................................................................................. 96 3.2 The relevance of non-elites to late Republican politics ....................................... 103 3.3 The tribunate and other governmental institutions............................................. 115 Chapter 4 The tribunate as agent institution .............................................................121 4.1 Possibilities for contention by principals ............................................................... 122 4.1.1 The tribunes in the public transcript .......................................................... 122 4.1.2 ‘Reining in’ the tribunes: reactive involvement by the principals ......... 128 4.1.3 ‘Spurring on’ the tribunes: active involvement by principals ................ 134 4.2 A complex web of strings: consequences of a model with multiple principals ..................................................................................................................... 145 4.2.1 Conflicting principals .................................................................................... 146 4.2.2 Power costs of contention ............................................................................. 161 4.3 Tribunes and the tribunate: individual factors in contention ............................. 182 4.3.1 Struggle between tribunes ............................................................................ 182 4.3.2 The individual tribune as a factor ................................................................ 192 4.3.3 Socialisation and role-making ...................................................................... 203 4.4 Principals, tribunate, and tribuens: conclusion ..................................................... 210 Chapter 5 The end of the Republic ..............................................................................213 5.1 The tribunes as puppets: privilegia ........................................................................... 217 5.1.1 Extraordinary military commands .............................................................. 218 5.1.2 Other extraordinary commissions ............................................................... 242 5.1.3 Personal prerogatives .................................................................................... 246 5.1.4 Servants of the “Great Individuals”? ........................................................... 253 5.2 The tribunes as demagogues: destructive agitators, or release valve for popular dissatisfaction? ............................................................................................. 255 5.2.1 Tribunes as the primary cause of conflict? ................................................ 256 5.2.2 Breaking claims of a status quo .................................................................... 263 5.2.3 Indicating rifts in society .............................................................................. 271 5.3 The relevance of the tribunate in the last decades of the late Republic ............ 294 5.3.1 The path to the Principate ............................................................................ 294 5.3.2 A new dominant coalition and the role of the tribunate ......................... 302 5.4 The tribunate in the end: conclusion ...................................................................... 309 Conclusion 311 Bibliography 317 x Introduction The tribuni plebis and the end of the Roman Republic The tribunate of the plebs was a very peculiar magistracy in Antiquity, as to the best of our knowledge there were no ready parallels in other city-states. Cicero compared the tribuni plebis to the ephors in classical Sparta, and while there are some similarities (mostly the check on the highest power), there are many differences too, and no direct link.1 There is a relatively clear origin story for the tribunes, which ascribes their creation to the first secessio plebis in 494 BCE and a vow by the plebs to protect their new magistrates, the lex sacrata. While the story then becomes somewhat shaky, with the sources having differing theories, the tribunes do always prominently figure in the ‘Struggle of the Orders’ between the plebs and the patricians. Despite a relatively fixed tradition on the origins of the tribunes, there was much discussion about these magistrates at the end of the late Republic and the start of the Principate. To name but two examples, Cicero’s de Legibus features a relatively long and undecided debate
Recommended publications
  • First Triumvirate and Rise of Octavian BY: Jake, Eliza and Maheen First Triumvirate
    First Triumvirate and Rise of Octavian BY: Jake, Eliza and Maheen First Triumvirate • An alliance of the three most powerful men in Rome, Marcus Licinus Crassus, Gaius Julius Caesar, and Gneaus Pompey Magnus. Rome was in chaos and the 3 seized control of the Republic. • The three would dominate Roman politics for personal gains throughout the territories of the Republic. Julius Caesar • In Rome, Julius Caesar was elected as the tribune of the Plebs, military tribune, and governor of many provinces throughout the Republic. • Believed Crassus helped Julius Caesar win the election to become the Propraetor or governor of Hispania in 63 B.C.E. • Julius returned to Rome after his term as governor. Caesar had a business or political agreement with Pompey and Crassus in 60 B.C.E. Caesar was the consul while Pompey and Crassus were in the senate. • Created the First Triumvirate • After his term, Julius was in deeply in debt politically and financially to Crassus and desperately needed to raise money. Marcus Crassus • Crassus was the richest man in all the Roman Republic. He was sharp and clever in Roman politics. He would be a senator and even become consul a few times. • He was a mentor to Julius Caesar in his early career. • Gained much fame during the Spartacus rebellion but much of it was stolen by Pompey. • He was a longtime rival to Pompey Magnus and this would be his eventually downfall. He would ally with Caesar and Pompey, but strived for military victory over Pompey. He went to Parthia where he was defeated at Carrhae.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C. Seth G. Bernard University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Bernard, Seth G., "Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C." (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 492. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/492 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/492 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Men at Work: Public Construction, Labor, and Society at Middle Republican Rome, 390-168 B.C. Abstract MEN AT WORK: PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION, LABOR, AND SOCIETY AT MID-REPUBLICAN ROME, 390-168 B.C. Seth G. Bernard C. Brian Rose, Supervisor of Dissertation This dissertation investigates how Rome organized and paid for the considerable amount of labor that went into the physical transformation of the Middle Republican city. In particular, it considers the role played by the cost of public construction in the socioeconomic history of the period, here defined as 390 to 168 B.C. During the Middle Republic period, Rome expanded its dominion first over Italy and then over the Mediterranean. As it developed into the political and economic capital of its world, the city itself went through transformative change, recognizable in a great deal of new public infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Due April 15
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Representation of Poverty in the Roman Empire Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3sp0w5c4 Author Larsen, Mik Robert Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles The Representation of Poverty in the Roman Empire A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Mik R Larsen 2015 © Copyright by Mik R Larsen 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Representation of Poverty in the Roman Empire by Mik R Larsen Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor Ronald J. Mellor, Chair This dissertation investigates the cultural imagination of Roman elites regarding poverty in their society – how it was defined, how traditional and accepted images of poverty were deployed for rhetorical effect, and in what way elite attitudes toward poverty evolved over the course of the first century and a half under the Empire. It contends that the Roman conception of poverty was as a disordered discourse involving multiple competing definitions which frequently overlapped in practice. It argues that the inherent contradictions in Roman thought about poverty were rarely addressed or acknowledged by authors during this period. The Introduction summarizes scholarly approaches toward Roman perceptions of poverty and offers a set of definitions which describe the variant images of poverty in elite texts. The first chapter addresses poverty’s role in the histories of Livy, and the ways in which his presentation of poverty diverge from his assertion that the loss of paupertas was key to the decline of the Roman state.
    [Show full text]
  • The Military Reforms of Gaius Marius in Their Social, Economic, and Political Context by Michael C. Gambino August, 2015 Directo
    The Military Reforms of Gaius Marius in their Social, Economic, and Political Context By Michael C. Gambino August, 2015 Director of Thesis: Dr. Frank Romer Major Department: History Abstract The goal of this thesis is, as the title affirms, to understand the military reforms of Gaius Marius in their broader societal context. In this thesis, after a brief introduction (Chap. I), Chap. II analyzes the Roman manipular army, its formation, policies, and armament. Chapter III examines Roman society, politics, and economics during the second century B.C.E., with emphasis on the concentration of power and wealth, the legislative programs of Ti. And C. Gracchus, and the Italian allies’ growing demand for citizenship. Chap. IV discusses Roman military expansion from the Second Punic War down to 100 B.C.E., focusing on Roman military and foreign policy blunders, missteps, and mistakes in Celtiberian Spain, along with Rome’s servile wars and the problem of the Cimbri and Teutones. Chap. V then contextualizes the life of Gaius Marius and his sense of military strategy, while Chap VI assesses Marius’s military reforms in his lifetime and their immediate aftermath in the time of Sulla. There are four appendices on the ancient literary sources (App. I), Marian consequences in the Late Republic (App. II), the significance of the legionary eagle standard as shown during the early principate (App. III), and a listing of the consular Caecilii Metelli in the second and early first centuries B.C.E. (App. IV). The Marian military reforms changed the army from a semi-professional citizen militia into a more professionalized army made up of extensively trained recruits who served for longer consecutive terms and were personally bound to their commanders.
    [Show full text]
  • Expulsion from the Senate of the Roman Republic, C.319–50 BC
    Ex senatu eiecti sunt: Expulsion from the Senate of the Roman Republic, c.319–50 BC Lee Christopher MOORE University College London (UCL) PhD, 2013 1 Declaration I, Lee Christopher MOORE, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Thesis abstract One of the major duties performed by the censors of the Roman Republic was that of the lectio senatus, the enrolment of the Senate. As part of this process they were able to expel from that body anyone whom they deemed unequal to the honour of continued membership. Those expelled were termed ‘praeteriti’. While various aspects of this important and at-times controversial process have attracted scholarly attention, a detailed survey has never been attempted. The work is divided into two major parts. Part I comprises four chapters relating to various aspects of the lectio. Chapter 1 sees a close analysis of the term ‘praeteritus’, shedding fresh light on senatorial demographics and turnover – primarily a demonstration of the correctness of the (minority) view that as early as the third century the quaestorship conveyed automatic membership of the Senate to those who held it. It was not a Sullan innovation. In Ch.2 we calculate that during the period under investigation, c.350 members were expelled. When factoring for life expectancy, this translates to a significant mean lifetime risk of expulsion: c.10%. Also, that mean risk was front-loaded, with praetorians and consulars significantly less likely to be expelled than subpraetorian members.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lex Sempronia Agraria: a Soldier's Stipendum
    THE LEX SEMPRONIA AGRARIA: A SOLDIER’S STIPENDUM by Raymond Richard Hill A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Boise State University August 2016 © 2016 Raymond Richard Hill ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COLLEGE DEFENSE COMMITTEE AND FINAL READING APPROVALS of the thesis submitted by Raymond Richard Hill Thesis Title: The Lex Sempronia Agraria: A Soldier’s Stipendum Date of Final Oral Examination: 16 June 2016 The following individuals read and discussed the thesis submitted by student Raymond Richard Hill, and they evaluated his presentation and response to questions during the final oral examination. They found that the student passed the final oral examination. Katherine V. Huntley, Ph.D. Chair, Supervisory Committee Lisa McClain, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee Lee Ann Turner, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee The final reading approval of the thesis was granted by Katherine V. Huntley, Ph.D., Chair of the Supervisory Committee. The thesis was approved for the Graduate College by Jodi Chilson, M.F.A., Coordinator of Theses and Dissertations. DEDICATION To Kessa for all of her love, patience, guidance and support. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to Dr. Katherine Huntley for her hours spent proofing my work, providing insights and making suggestions on research materials. To Dr. Charles Matson Odahl who started this journey with me and first fired my curiosity about the Gracchi. To the history professors of Boise State University who helped me become a better scholar. v ABSTRACT This thesis examines mid-second century BCE Roman society to determine the forces at work that resulted in the passing of a radical piece of legislation known as the lex Sempronia agraria.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological and Literary Etruscans: Constructions of Etruscan Identity in the First Century Bce
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND LITERARY ETRUSCANS: CONSTRUCTIONS OF ETRUSCAN IDENTITY IN THE FIRST CENTURY BCE John B. Beeby A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classics in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: James B. Rives Jennifer Gates-Foster Luca Grillo Carrie Murray James O’Hara © 2019 John B. Beeby ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT John B. Beeby: Archaeological and Literary Etruscans: Constructions of Etruscan Identity in the First Century BCE (Under the direction of James B. Rives) This dissertation examines the construction and negotiation of Etruscan ethnic identity in the first century BCE using both archaeological and literary evidence. Earlier scholars maintained that the first century BCE witnessed the final decline of Etruscan civilization, the demise of their language, the end of Etruscan history, and the disappearance of true Etruscan identity. They saw these changes as the result of Romanization, a one-sided and therefore simple process. This dissertation shows that the changes occurring in Etruria during the first century BCE were instead complex and non-linear. Detailed analyses of both literary and archaeological evidence for Etruscans in the first century BCE show that there was a lively, ongoing discourse between and among Etruscans and non-Etruscans about the place of Etruscans in ancient society. My method musters evidence from Late Etruscan family tombs of Perugia, Vergil’s Aeneid, and Books 1-5 of Livy’s history. Chapter 1 introduces the topic of ethnicity in general and as it relates specifically to the study of material remains and literary criticism.
    [Show full text]
  • LATIJNSE EPIGRAFISCHE POËZIE UIT DE REPUBLIEK Repertorium, Vertaling En Studie
    Vrije Universiteit Brussel Faculteit Letteren En Wijsbegeerte Taal- en Letterkunde: Latijn – Grieks LATIJNSE EPIGRAFISCHE POËZIE UIT DE REPUBLIEK Repertorium, vertaling en studie door Wouter Keuleers Promotor: Prof. Dr. Dorothy Pikhaus Eindverhandeling ingediend tot het behalen van de graad van licentiaat in de taal- en letterkunde: Latijn – Grieks Academiejaar 2002-2003 VOORWOORD De klassieke filologie is een studie die voor een groot deel nog steeds gericht is op een romantisch en een heroïsch ideaal. We lezen Homeros, Aeschylus, Aristophanes, Sophocles, Herodotos, Plato en Aristoteles. We lezen Cicero, Caesar, Vergilius, Ovidius, Livius en Ta- citus. We staan in bewondering voor de schitterende prestaties in de filosofie en de weten- schappen van de antieke mens, en hun kunstwerken roepen bij ons het beeld op van een groots verleden. Maar wat leert ons dat over de leefwereld van de kleine man? Mijn interesse voor de Carmina Latina Epigraphica, die uiteindelijk geresulteerd heeft in deze thesis, is ontstaan uit nieuwsgierigheid naar de kleine literatuur en naar de poëzie van de gewone mens uit de Oud- heid. Tevens zou ik hierbij graag mijn dank uitdrukken aan mijn promotor Professor Dorothy Pikhaus, aan wie ik veel verschuldigd ben. Ze heeft me met raad en daad geholpen bij de uitwerking van deze thesis. Haar ervaring, haar adviezen en haar eigen belangstelling voor het onderwerp waren voor mij een grote steun. Haar hulp bij de correcties, haar praktische tips en de tijd die ze er zelf aan besteedde, hebben dit werk in de goede banen geleid. Bovendien mocht ik ook probleemloos gebruik maken van haar eigen literatuur en bibliografie.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Government Notes
    Roman Government through the Centuries c.700 BCE to c.200 CE Contents: Introduction p. 2 Presentation Notes p. 3 Questions p. 17 There are two versions of this PowerPoint presentation, one with on-screen notes and one without. In both cases, the Presentation Notes here can be used to provide further information. This presentation and these notes assume knowledge of the history of Ancient Rome. For a quick overview of this, see our Premium Unit, The Rise and Fall of Ancient Rome. Page #1 Introduction In this PowerPoint presentation, a sequence of slides forms an interactive diagram tracing the evolution of Roman government over the centuries. It covers the period from Rome’s early days under the kings, through the Republic and ending in the early Empire, or Principate." The diagram is designed to give a clear overview of how the governing institutions operated and connected to one another, and how they developed over time. The predominant theme is of increasing complexity, as the Roman state grappled with the consequences of growth. Towards the end, though, a new story comes to the fore: one of near-collapse followed by restoration." It should be noted here that Rome’s political structures were far too complex to be treated in full, without the whole presentation becoming lost in the detail. It is therefore designed as a bird’s eye view which should allow users to get a clear idea of the overall government system as it grew and developed, then experienced decline and breakdown, and finally restoration and renewal." Why is all this important? It is impossible to understand the history of the West without a knowledge of the Roman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 05 April 2016 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Russell, A. (2015) 'The tribunate of the plebs as a magistracy of crisis.', in Deformations and crises of ancient civil communities. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 127-139. Further information on publisher's website: http://www.steiner-verlag.de/programm/fachbuch/altertumswissenschaften/alte- geschichte/reihen/view/titel/60671.html Publisher's copyright statement: Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk This is an author’s preprint. This article is published as Russell, Amy. ‘The tribunate of the plebs as a magistracy of crisis’, in Deformations and Crises of Ancient Civil Communities , ed. Valerij Gouschin and P. J. Rhodes, Franz Steiner 2015: 127-39, and should be cited from that edition: http://www.steiner-verlag.de/programm/fachbuch/altertumswissenschaften/alte- geschichte/reihen/view/titel/60671.html The tribunate of the plebs as a magistracy of crisis Appian’s Bella Civilia , the most extensive continuous narrative of the end of the Roman Republic to have survived from the ancient world, depicts the tribunate of Tiberius Gracchus in 133 BCE as the beginning of the end.
    [Show full text]
  • 03-AK2 A130-16 Pieper Layout 1
    RhM 159 (2016) 156–190 MENENIUS AGRIPPA ALS EXEMPLUM FÜR DIE FRÜHE RÖMISCHE BEREDSAMKEIT Eine historische Spurensuche* 1. Menenius Agrippa orator? Menenius Agrippa, der durch seine berühmte Fabel vom Staat als menschlichem Körper das römische Volk mit der Aristokratie versöhnt haben und dadurch das Auseinanderbrechen der frisch entstandenen römischen Republik verhindert haben soll, wurde im 20. Jahrhundert vor allem als demagogischer Redner rezipiert. Er konnte geradezu als Symbol für die politische Dichotomie zwi- schen Kommunismus und Nationalsozialismus eingesetzt werden. So machte auf der einen Seite der marxistische Philosoph Ernst Bloch in einem Essay des Jahres 1936 Menenius Agrippa zu einem Demagogen und „Schwadroneur“. Als Erfinder der Soziallüge fungierte Menenius für Bloch als Sinnbild der Unterdrückung der Arbeiterklasse, wie in der prägnanten Formulierung „der älteste Sozial-Goebbels“ besonders deutlich wird.1 Auf der anderen Seite beschrieb der Publizistikwissenschaftler Emil Dovifat in einem Büchlein mit dem Titel Rede und Redner von 1937 Menenius Agrippa als einen „wahrhaft volkstümliche[n] Redner“, was in Do- vifats Argumentation ein uneingeschränktes Kompliment darstellt: Die Kategorie der Volkstümlichkeit wird zur Grundlage guter Rhetorik stilisiert, die ihren glanzvollen historischen Zielpunkt in Mussolini und Hitler erreicht habe.2 *) Der Artikel geht auf einen Vortrag zurück, den ich beim niederländischen Latinistentag 2014 an der Universität Nijmegen gehalten habe. Dem dortigen Pu- blikum, v.a. Diederik Burgersdijk (Nijmegen) und Rodie Risselada (Amsterdam), danke ich für konstruktive Kritik. Auch der Leidener Arbeitsgruppe Rhetorik bin ich für manche Hinweise dankbar. Stephanos Matthaios (Thessaloniki) hat dan- kenswerterweise den Beitrag gründlich gelesen und viele hilfreiche Verbesserungs- vorschläge gemacht. Meine Forschung wurde ermöglicht durch ein VENI-Stipen- dium der Nederlands Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek.
    [Show full text]
  • Select Republican Political Institutions in Outline
    ____ APPENDIX: SELECT REPUBLICAN POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS IN OUTLINE (300 before 81; 600 down to 45 Bc; then 900 until SENATE. The main consiliu,’n (“advisory body”) of magistrates, itself consisting mainly of ex-magistrates step aside for others. What the Senate decided Augustus reduced it again to 600). The most senior magistrate available in Rome usually presided, but could the Senate long guided state administration and policy e,zatu.s consultant, abbreviated SC) was strictly only a recommendation to magistrates. But in actual fact, of imperium, triumphs; also the state religion, finance, and preliminary iii almost all matters, including wars, allocation of provinces, (eventually) all extensions in which case it is called patrum auctoritas. The 1isiussion of legislative bills, A SC could be vetoed (by a consul acting against his colleague, or by a tribune), more than advice. SC riltirnurn, first passed in 121, was employed in cases of extreme crisis, but again technically was no ASSEMBLIES (U: POPULUS. COMPOSED OF BOTH PATRICIANS AND PLEBEJANS (NON-PATRICIANS). cum imperia. Gave “military auspices” to consuls, praetors once elected by the Centuriate Assembly; also to dictators, non-magistrates was a consul (or sometimes apparently a practor); in Aserubly Validated in some way the powers of lower magistrates (aediles, quaestors). Its president curiae (“wards”) of the city. (c mitia Cicero’s day, it was enough for a lictor symbolically to represent each of the 30 voting (‘101010) (“infantry”), the latter divided into five classes, Centuriate Originally the army, which had centuriae as its constituent units. Equites (“cavalry”) and pedites A of these 193 voting units, not absolute A ,seni hlv ranked by census wealth, totalled 188 centuries; added to those were five unarmed centuries.
    [Show full text]