sign in sign up
<<
Home , Type II supernova

arXiv:astro-ph/0211171v1 8 Nov 2002 rdcdi h aesdrn h oehlu unn in ( burning by ( lowed core Photodisintegrate the seeds) progenitor. during (s-process layers the s-nuclei the in of produced synthesized are the p-nuclei The Among by explosion. during layers / II 2002). the Type of is al. promising dwarfs most et the white them, (Goriely CO mass helium-accreting Meyer sub-Chandrasekhar (Howard, 1991); explosion Woosley supernova (Hoffman Ia & explosion Type supernova 1996); al. after et et nascent shortly (Schatz a novae from originated X-ray winds explo- -driven 1978); 1998); supernova Howard al. their presupernova & during (Woosley their and sion of of during 1976) layers (Arnould sites oxygen/neon phase massive production proposed: evolved in Many been highly found have also p-nuclei iso- meteorites. are the system; nuclei primitive solar these the some involving inside anomalies only meteorites topic in found are A number ta.(90) ae,Pato rol 19) ae et Rayet (1990), Prantzos Arnould by & Prantzos performed Rayet, are p- (1990b), supernovae the al. et of II investigations Type Extensive re- in is p-process. process a photodisintegrations as subsequent to the ferred via p-nuclei of rpittpstuigL using typeset Preprint 2018 29, September version Draft hr xs 5nurndfiin tbence ihmass with nuclei stable deficient neutron 35 exist There fsvrlpret fflbc atraeeetdvajt and/o jets via ejected are headings: Subject fallback of percents several if h -rcs uloytei nSAscnrbtst hmcle chemical rather to is contributes p-nuclei SSADs of in nucleosynthesis profile p-process abundance The overall the though fpoo hog alihTyo ntblt uigteepoin s explosion, the s fallba during p-nuclei, the instability Some If Rayleigh-Taylor supernovae. system. II through solar Type t proton the in in as of of layers SSADs that oxygen/neon the the with in of agreement underproduced that in supernova is is II object Type profile compact in the layers oxygen/neon from the far of those to feature rdcdisd h SSADs. the inside produced f1.4 of rvnsprrtclaceindss(SD)we h crto r accretion synt the are when p-nuclei (SSADs) of disks amounts material accretion appreciable fallback supercritical that with driven supernova found a is in It occur object. to expected is accretion L Edd γ, eivsiaeppoesncesnhssi ueciia accre supercritical a in nucleosynthesis p-process investigate We ≥ )ado ( and/or p) eateto lcrncCnrl uaooNtoa Colle National Kumamoto Control, Electronic of Department steEdntnlmnst.Audnepolso -uliejected p-nuclei of profiles Abundance luminosity. Eddington the is 4rfre oa -uli hs nuclei These p-nuclei. as to referred 74 M -RCS ULOYTEI NIESPROADIE SUPER SUPERNOVA-DRIVEN INSIDE NUCLEOSYNTHESIS P-PROCESS eateto hsc,Kmmt nvriy uaoo860- Kumamoto University, Kumamoto Physics, of Department ⊙ sn h efsmlrslto fa pial hc deto dominate advection thick optically an of solution self-similar the using , A 1. T E tl mltajv 14/09/00 v. emulateapj style X eateto hsc,Sho fSine,Kuh Universi Kyushu Sciences, of School Physics, of Department introduction ,α γ, uenve general supernovae: crto,aceindss—ncerratos nucleosynthesis, reactions, nuclear — disks accretion Accretion, ecin.Teproduction The reactions. ) [email protected] [email protected] [email protected], γ, 96 )ratosaefol- are reactions n) uand Ru aaaiHsiooadOauKoike Osamu and Hashimoto Masa-aki ez riadRuciMatsuba Ryuichi and Arai Kenzo rf eso etme 9 2018 29, September version Draft [email protected] 138 hnihruFujimoto Shin-ichirou CRTO DISKS ACCRETION aaeas rdcdwe h alakgscnan abundant contains gas fallback the when produced also are La [email protected] ABSTRACT and 1 nteslrsse.Hwvr h oe a conspicu- a has of model underproduction the of However, shortcoming system. ous p-nuclei solar et of the profile Rayet super- abundance in II of overall Type the model during layers reproduces p-process oxygen/neon novae the A with in (1995) (1998) network. al. Hashimoto nuclear & large Rayet a Arnould, and (1995), al. and oil ta.20) il of 1990; Yield al. 2001); et al. (Woosley et processes neutrino Goriely to invoked been y16 by W5,where WW95), rcino jce atri xetdt albc noa onto 10 back fall than rates accretion to greater supercritical expected with object is recent compact matter new-born a ejected by of excluded fraction possibly 2001). is al. rate et high (Jaeger experiment a such ever, nepouto fM n uwt neteeyhigh extremely an with the Ru improve of and could rate et Mo burning in of (Goriely helium synthesized changed core underproduction seeds during appreciably s-process layers of not the Enhancement are 2001). those Ru al. though and interactions Mo neutrino of via increased is layers omto fa crto iki nvtbe(iehg et (Mineshige inevitable is disk accretion momentum, an angular of substantial formation has material fallback the uigsproaepoini asv tr,certain stars, massive in explosion supernova During eo ehooy uaoo8110,Japan; 861-1102, Kumamoto Technology, of ge 138 L 55 aa;[email protected], Japan; 8555, 22 Edd a bnatpoutoso uhpnce have p-nuclei such of productions Abundant La. winds. r hnteaudneo h alakgas fallback the of abundance the when e Na( eie i h -rcs nsupernova- in p-process the via hesized ouino -uli nparticular in p-nuclei, of volution ieetfo hto h oa system. solar the of that from different y uuk 1-50 Japan; 810-8560, Fukuoka ty, /c epoeio.Teoealabundance overall The progenitor. he t ˙ ate kgsi ie ihasalfraction small a with mixed is gas ck 2 α, inds rudacmatobject compact a around disk tion crtn noanwbr compact new-born a onto accreting ihteEdntnluminosity, Eddington the with m n) M 4 hu-u.ac.jp ˙ c sM,R,S,adL,are La, and Sn, Ru, Mo, as uch M gicn mut of amounts ignificant 25 cr ˙ = cr grato Csae l 00.How- 2000). al. et (Costa reaction Mg steciia asaceinrt given rate accretion mass critical the is Mc Woly&Wae 95 hereafter 1995, Weaver & (Woosley ˙ rmSAshv similar have SSADs from 2 / (16 bnacs—stars: — abundances o.Supercritical flow. d L Edd CRITICAL 138 ai h oxygen/neon the in La ) > 10 92 92 5 oare Mo where , , 94 92 Mo, Mo, L 96 Edd , 98 If . Ru, 2 Fujimoto et al. al. 1997). Fujimoto et al. (2001) have investigated nu- of M, αvis, andm ˙ . In the present paper, we fix both cleosynthesis inside supernova-driven supercritical accre- M =1.4 M⊙ and αvis =0.01 (e.g, Hawley 2000), whilem ˙ tion disks (SSADs) and shown that appreciable nuclear is left to be a parameter. 5 reactions take place if the accretion rate M˙ > 10 M˙ cr. At such high accretion rates, SSADs contain the regions 2.2. The Nuclear Reaction Network where , , and dynamical time-scale are We have developed a nuclear reaction network which comparable to those of the oxygen/neon layers in Type II has been extended from a smaller network (Hashimoto supernovae. Therefore, the p-process is likely to operate & Arai 1985; Koike et al. 1999). The nuclear data are efficiently inside SSADs. taken from the data base REACLIB1, which includes many We propose a SSAD as a candidate for the produc- experimental rates and theoretical Hauser-Feshbach rates tion of p-nuclei. In §2, we present a model of SSADs (Rauscher & Thielemann 2000, 2001). We have also used and a nuclear network to calculate the abundance evo- the experimental mass data (Audi & Wapstra 1995). The lution inside a SSAD. We also discuss possible progenitors reactions included in the network are (n,γ), (n, p), (n, α), for p-process nucleosynthesis inside SSADs and the initial (p,γ), (p, α), (α, γ), 3α, and their inverse reactions. The chemical abundances of the fallback material far from the various channels of 12C+12C, 12C+16O, and 16O+16O are central compact remnant. In §3, we describe abundance also included in the network. For β− and β+ decays, REA- distributions of p-nuclei inside SSADs, ejected masses of CLIB rates are updated with the corresponding data in these nuclei from SSADs, and effects of proton and helium Horiguchi et al. (1996) if available. We have also added β− contamination of the fallback gas via Rayleigh-Taylor in- and β+ decays and and positron captures (Fuller stability. We discuss our results in §4 and finally present et al. 1980, 1982a, 1982b). Some rates are revised with concluding remarks in §5. experimental rates (see details in Koike et al. 1999). Our network includes 1988 nuclides from neutron and proton 2. model and input physics up to 209Bi, presented in Table 1. The network is solved implicitly with an inverter of a sparse matrix (Timmes 2.1. The Supercritical Accretion Disk Model 1999). Physical quantities of supercritical accretion disks with Possible Progenitors for P-Process Nucleosynthesis M˙ ≫ M˙ cr are well described in terms of the self-similar so- 2.3. lution. The density ρ, temperature T and drift time-scale inside SSADs tdr of accreting gas are evaluated with the self-similar disk As the case of Type II supernovae, synthesis of p-nuclei model as adopted by Fujimoto et al. (2001) to be inside SSADs requires the s-process seeds. The fallback −1 after a supernova explosion is likely to be induced by deep ρ M 2 gravitational potential of relatively massive stars and/or 4 −3 =1.9(1 + αvis/7) 10 g cm  1.4M⊙  reverse shock inwardly propagating from the outer compo- − −1 3/2 sition interfaces (Colgate 1971; Chevalier 1989; WW95). αvis m˙ r × , (1) A total amount of fallback material increases as mass of 0.01 106  3r    g a progenitor are enhanced (WW95; Fryer 1999, hereafter − T M 1/4 F99; Fryer & Heger 2000); Massive fallback is likely to take > =4.3 ∼ 109 K 1.4M⊙  place for the progenitors with MMS 20M⊙ due to their − large of the core, where MMS is the −1/4 1/4 5/8 αvis m˙ r mass of the progenitor on the main-sequence. For massive × 6 ,(2) > 0.01 10  3rg  stars with MMS ∼40M⊙, supernova explosion cannot take place and collapsed matter forms a promptly tdr 2 M =1.9 1+ αvis/7 (F99). Several seconds after the core collapse a quasi-  0.01s q 1.4M⊙  steady accretion disk is formed around the hole if the pro- α −1 r 3/2 genitor has sufficient angular momentum (MacFadyen & × vis , (3) 0.01 3r  Woosley 1999), which is in a reasonable range of a progeni-   g tor model of Heger, Langer & Woosley (2000). Highly vari- −1 where r is the radial coordinate, M is the mass of the able supercritical accretion with 0.01–0.1 M⊙ s is main- central compact object, αvis is the viscous parameter, tained for approximately 10–20 s (MacFadyen & Woosley 2 m˙ = M/˙ M˙ cr, and rg = 2GM/c is the Schwarzschild ra- 1999). For such high accretion rates, however, the accre- > 10 dius. The model has been assumed to be steady and ax- tion disk has enough high temperature ( ∼10 K) for ac- isymmetric with the self- ignored. It is noted that creting gas to contain only and (Popham, < 12 in SSADs withm ˙ ∼10 advective cooling dominates over Fryer & Woosley 1999). Therefore, the progenitors with > radiative and neutrino cooling; it balances with viscous MMS ∼40M⊙ is irrelevant for p-process nucleosynthesis in- energy generation. A disk is also assumed to be extended side SSADs. from the last stable circular orbit around a black hole to While for progenitors with MMS = 20–40M⊙ a neu- the location of accretion shock ∼ 109cm (Fryer, Colgate & tron star is formed soon after the core collapse. Super- Pinto 1999; MacFadyen, Woosley & Heger 2001). Hence, launches outward-going shock successfully but some the inner and outer boundaries of the disk, rin and rout, fraction of supernova ejecta falls back onto the nascent 3 9 areset to be 3 rg and 3×10 rg (= 1.2 ×10 M/M⊙ cm), re- , which is transformed to a black hole via spectively. A sequence of the models is specified in terms massive fallback (F99). The accreting matter onto the 1 The REACLIB compilation of reaction rates is available at: ftp://quasar.physik.unibas.ch/pub/tommy/astro/reaclib/ P-Process inside SN-Driven Supercritical Disks 3

−4 −2 −1 hole forms a disk with 10 –10 M⊙ s lasting for hun- As fallback material accretes onto a central object, tem- dreds to thousands of seconds (MacFadyen et al. 2001). perature and density of the gas increase (see equations After most of layers of the progenitors has fallen (1) and (2)) and thus abundances of the accreting gas are back into the hole, the accretion rate is declined as t−5/3 changed through a sequence of nuclear reactions from an (Chevalier 1989; MacFadyen et al. 2001) and compositions initial composition described in §2.4. Using the nuclear re- of the accreting matter are those of explosively burned action network and the self-similar solution, we can follow oxygen/neon layers via supernova shock. In a 20M⊙ pro- the evolution of the chemical composition inside SSADs genitor model (Hashimoto 1995), the position of rout (= during the infall toward the compact object through post- 3000rg) is far from the core and located at Mr ≃ 2.1M⊙, processing calculations for M10, M20, M30, and M40. The or the oxygen/neon layer, where the peak temperature calculations are carried out from rout to rin. It should be during the shock propagation is too low to proceed ap- noted that the nuclear energy generation is assumed to be < 9 preciable nuclear burning of s-process seeds ( ∼2 × 10 K). much smaller than the viscous heating. < 5 The material still leaves the s-process seeds even after the For disks withm ˙ ∼10 , the maximum temperature of supernova explosion. Appreciable amounts of the seeds disks is less than 2 × 109 K which is the minimum temper- can fall back onto the compact object through the accre- ature for the p-process to proceed in the so called p-process tion disk. Accordingly, p-process nucleosynthesis operates layers (PPLs) in Type II supernovae (Rayet et al. 1990, inside a supercritical accretion disk driven by supernova 1995). Therefore, p-process nucleosynthesis does not oper- explosion of the progenitors with MMS = 20–40M⊙. ate in the disks for such low accretion rates. For higher ac- cretion rates, the accreting gas has higher temperature and 2.4. Initial Abundances of Fallback Matter the p-process can proceed significantly. The abundance Chemical composition of fallback matter depends on distributions of p-nuclei are similar for the disks with var- masses of progenitors and fallback mechanisms. Because ious accretion rates, while the production site of p-nuclei p-process nucleosynthesis inside SSADs needs s-process shifts toward the outer part of the disk as the accretion 8 seeds, we set the compositions of the accreting gas at rout rates increase. Thus, we show the results ofm ˙ = 10 as a to be averaged compositions of oxygen/neon layers of the representative case. progenitors of 10, 20, 30, and 40 M⊙, whose models are Figure 2 shows the abundance profiles, normalized with refererred to as M10, M20, M30, and M40, respectively. the solar abundances, of representative p-nuclei for M20. These abundances were calculated with a network which The abscissa is the radius of the fallback disk in units of contains 440 nuclei up to Bi. (Prantzos, Hashimoto & rg. The solid, thick-solid, dashed, thick-dashed, dotted, Nomoto 1990a). Although the progenitors with masses of and thick-dotted lines indicate the abundances of 74Se, 92 138 152 180 196 MMS < 20M⊙ are unlikely to be relevant for p-process Mo, La, Gd, Ta, and Hg, respectively. At inside a SSAD, we also calculate abundances of p-nuclei r > 100 rg, of the accreting gas are too low for M10 because the abundance pattern is different from to proceed appreciable synthesis of p-nuclei. The abun- the others (Figure 1). It should be emphasized that these dances of 152Gd and 180Ta are the same as the initial val- 9 180 abundances were also adopted as the seed abundances in ues. At r ≃ 100 rg (T ≃ 1.3 × 10 K), Ta increases the p-process models of Rayet et al. (1990, 1995). Figure via neutron capture of 179Ta, contained in the fallback 1 shows the initial abundances of M10, M20, and M40, material initially. As the gas moves to the inner part of which are denoted by the dashed, solid, and thick-solid the disk, the temperature increases and the heavy p-nuclei lines, respectively. The initial abundances of M30 are in (A ≥ 150), such as 152Gd, 180Ta, and 196Hg are rapidly de- < > 9 between those of M20 and M40. The solar abundances are stroyed through (γ, n) reactions. At r ∼50 rg (T ∼2.0 × 10 also depicted with the filled circles (Anders & Grevesse K), however, these isotopes are drastically produced. This 1989). is due to the photodisintegrations of the neutron-rich seed Compositions of fallback matter are not those of the elements when the temperature of the accreting gas at- oxygen/neon layers of the progenitors but those of explo- tains to 2 − 3 × 109 K comparable to PPLs (Rayet et sively burned layers because of supernova shock heating. al. 1995). Thus, the p-processes operate efficiently inside Abundances of p-nuclei produced inside SSADs depend on the accretion disk as in the PPLs. The intermediate p- amounts of s-process seeds, as we can see later. The ex- nuclei (100 ≤ A< 150) also enhance via the p-process. It plosively burned layers where the peak temperature of a should be noted that tdr ≃ 0.1–1 s in this region is compa- is lower than 2×109K still contain compara- rable to the time-scale of shock propagation through PPLs ble s-process seeds to those before the explosion. Accord- (Rayet et al. 1995). < > 9 ingly, the initial compositions of the oxygen/neon layers of For a region r ∼30rg (T ∼2.8 × 10 K), (γ, p) and (γ, α) the progenitors are relevant for our p-process model inside reactions of the heavy and intermediate isotopes dominate SSADs at least for fallback of the layers with relatively low over (γ, n) reactions; while for the light p-nuclei (A< 100), peak temperature ≤ 2 × 109K. such as 74Se and 92Mo, (γ, n) reactions are still dominant The compositions of fallback material discussed above processes. The light p-nuclei are eventually depleted via 9 are possibly altered when large-scale matter mixing is sig- (γ, p) and (γ, α) reactions near 20 rg (T ∼ 3.6 × 10 K). It nificant in supernova explosion. Such mixing is probably is noted that the abundance profiles for all models are simi- associated with fallback. Hence, we shall discuss effects of lar, while the more p-nuclei are produced the more massive matter mixing on p-process nucleosynthesis in §3.3. are progenitors because of the richness of s-process seeds (Figure 1). 3. nucleosynthesis inside ssads 3.1. Abundance Distributions of P-Nuclei inside SSADs 3.2. Ejected Masses of P-Nuclei from SSADs 4 Fujimoto et al.

Many astrophysical objects involving an accretion disk key nuclear reactions still preclude precise estimation of are observed to produce jets and/or winds (e.g., Livio 1999 s-process yields. and references therein). Hence, as the accreting gas falls back onto the central object, some fraction of gas is pos- 3.3. Proton and Helium Contamination through Matter sibly ejected from the disk via jets and/or winds. The Mixing processed material ranging from rin to rej is supposed to be ejected. Then we can estimate the averaged mass frac- Several observations in SN 1987A support the occur- tion X¯i of the i-th p-nucleus ejected from the disks, rence of large-scale mixing in the ejecta. Newly synthe- sized 56Ni near the collapsed core is likely to be mixed up 2π rej X¯i = Xi(r) Σ(r) r dr, (4) into the envelope as indicated from observations M(rej) Zrin in early phase; X-ray and γ-ray light curves (e.g., Kumagai where Σ(r) is the column density of the disk. Here M(rej) et al. 1989 and references therein) and optical spectroscopy is the mass of the disk from rin to rej and the fraction (e.g., Mitchell et al. 2001 and references therein). Two- of the ejected gas to the accreting gas is assumed to be dimensional simulations of supernova explosions (M¨uller, constant in radius. To compare the p-nuclei abundances Fryxell & Arnett 1991; Herant & Benz 1992; Nagataki, ejected from the fallback disks with the solar abundances, Shimizu & Sato 1998) indicate that the large-scale mixing we calculate the overproduction factors (OPFs) Fi of 35 is caused via Rayleigh-Taylor instability. A recent high- p-nuclei (Rayet et al. 1995): resolution simulation by Kifonidis et al. (2000) shows that a large amount of 4He is mixed down near the iron core by F = (X¯ /X ⊙)/F , (5) i i i, 0 the Rayleigh-Taylor instability. Hydrogen is also shown to where Xi, ⊙ is the mass fraction in the solar system and be mixed down to the core (Hachisu et al. 1990). More- 35 ¯ F0 = i=1(Xi/Xi, ⊙)/35. In many accretion powered sys- over, several analyses of observations in SN 1987A are also tems,P matter ejection via jets and/or winds could be origi- preferable to mixing of the outer hydrogen-rich envelope nated from the inner region of the accretion disks. There- down to the inner metal-rich core; the width of plateau-like fore, we set rej to be 100rg (Junor et al. 1999). The chem- peak of the bolometric light curves (Shigeyama & Nomoto ical composition of the ejected material is assumed to be 1990), line profiles in late spectral evolution (Kozma & constant throughout a jet and/or a wind. Abundances of Fransson 1998), and the light curve for the first 4 months p-nuclei increase due to β-decays of their unstable parent (Blinnikov et al. 2000). Thus, appreciable amounts of pro- nuclei after the freeze out. However, abundances of most ton and helium are likely to be mixed down to the inner p-nuclei are not appreciably enhanced after the β-decays core via the Rayleigh-Taylor instability in SN 1987A. Cer- (see §4.2). tain fractions of proton and helium are accordingly mixed Figures 3 and 4 show the OPFs of 35 p-nuclei for M20 into the oxygen/neon layers. and M10, respectively. It is emphasized that the abun- Such mixing is probably generic in core-collapsed su- dance profiles have similar features to those in Type II su- pernovae; recent X-ray observations in Cas A (Douvion et pernovae (Rayet et al. 1995). The light p-nuclei, 92,94Mo al. 1999; Hughes et al. 2000), emission line profiles of SN and 96,98Ru are underproduced in our calculations. This 1988A (Spyromilio 1991) and SN 1993J (Spyromilio 1994), is due to the deficiency of their s-process seeds (Fuller and optical and infrared spectroscopies of SN 1995V (Fas- & Meyer 1995). The intermediate mass p-nuclei, 113In, sia et al. 1998) and SN 1998S (Fassia et al. 2001). 115Sn, and 138La, cannot be produced appreciably for M10 Moreover, recent investigation for anomalous composi- and M20. It is noted that 113In and 115Sn are largely tion in a companion of the black hole binary Nova Sco sug- enhanced through β-decays after ejection via jets and/or gests that the companion is polluted by material ejected winds (see §4.2). 152Gd is underproduced in our calcula- in the supernova accompanied with the formation of the tions, while a large amount of 152Gd is synthesized in the hole (Israelian et al. 1999). The progenitor in this system 164 stellar s-process (Prantzos et al. 1990a). Er is also un- is likely to experience substantial fallback (≃ a few M⊙) derproduced in our calculations. The overproductions of and matter mixing in supernova ejecta (Podsiadlowski et 74Se (M20) and 184Os (M10) are attributed to the ample- al. 2002). Such fallback with mixing is also preferable to ness of their s-process seeds. The OPF of 120Te is largely the large abundance of Zn observed in the very metal-poor increased for M10 compared with that of M20. The OPFs stars (Umeda & Nomoto 2002). Therefore, the fallback of Se, Kr, and Sr for M10 are smaller than those for M20 gas is expected to be contaminated with some fractions of but those of p-nuclei with A ≥ 168 are larger. Such pro- proton and helium via the large-scale mixing. files of the OPFs are also responsible for initial abundance To investigate effects of proton and helium contamina- distributions of s-process seeds. The OPFs for M30 and tion of the fallback material on the p-process nucleosyn- M40 are similar profiles to those for M20. However, F0 for thesis, we add an arbitrary fraction of proton or helium to M30 and M40 are larger than F0 for M20 (Table 2). This the initial abundance of M20 and calculate the abundance is because more massive progenitor has larger amounts of distributions inside SSADs. The initial proton abundance s-process seeds (Figure 1). of the fallback matter highly depends on large-scale mixing Profiles of the OPFs ejected from SSADs depend on and fallback mechanism. There exists no reliable estima- initial abundance distributions of s-process seeds. The s- tion of the initial proton abundance. Analyses of observa- process seeds are mainly synthesized during a helium core tions in SN 1987A indicate that the mass fraction of proton burning stage in massive stars. The s-process nucleosyn- is 0.01 (Blinnikov et al. 2000) or up to 0.3 (Shigeyama & thesis in massive stars has been extensively investigated Nomoto 1990). Hence we examine the cases of the initial by many authors (e.g., Prantzos et al. 1990a; K¨appeler et mass fraction of proton Xp =0.01, 0.1, and 0.3, which are al. 1994; Rayet & Hashimoto 2000); Uncertainties in some referred as models M20P001, M20P01, and M20P03, re- P-Process inside SN-Driven Supercritical Disks 5 spectively. In these models, p-nuclei are produced via not where Ml and Mu are the lower and upper mass limits of only of s-process seeds but radiative progenitors and Mcont is the total mass (in units of M⊙) proton capture of lighter nuclei. which contributes to the production of p-nuclei via super- Figure 5 shows the OPFs for M20P001 withm ˙ = 108. novae or SSADs. 92 The most remarkable is an enhancement of Mo. Even if We assume that the progenitors of 13 ≤ MMS/M⊙ ≤ 20 the fallback material contains a small fraction of proton, can produce p-nuclei via supernova explosion (Rayet et radiative proton captures as well as photodisintegrations al. 1995), while the progenitor with 20 ≤ MMS/M⊙ ≤ 40 are efficient. The light p-nuclei, 74Se, 78Kr, and 84Sr, are can yield p-nuclei through SSADs driven by massive fall- increased, while the light p-nuclei underproduced in M20, back. For supernovae and SSADs, Mcont is the mass of the 94 96 98 such as Mo, Ru, and Ru, are still deficient. The PPLs, MPPL (Rayet et al. 1995) and the ejected mass from 114 115 138 intermediate mass p-nuclei, Sn, Sn, and La are a disk via jets and/or winds, Mej, respectively. Adopting underproduced as M20. The OPFs of the heavy p-nuclei ξ(M) ∝ M −2.3 proposed by Salpeter (1955), we can cal- are decreased compared with M20 though abundances of culate hF0iIMF as 18.3 for supernovae. Here we use the these p-nuclei are not appreciably changed. This is be- results of Rayet et al. (1995) for MPPL and F0(M) (in cause the averaged OPF, F0, is increased (equation (5)). their Tables 2 and 3). A calculation is performed in a We also find that profiles of the OPFs weakly depend on similar manner to Rayet et al. (1995). 8 Xp form ˙ = 10 : the OPFs for M20P01 and M20P03 are Next we estimate hF0iIMF for SSADs for the two cases: not significantly changed from those for M20P001. The no proton mixing and complete mixing. In actual situa- averaged OPFs, F0, of M20P001, M20P01, and M20P03 tions, uncertain fractions of fallback matter are affected are larger than that of M20 and listed in Table 2. For by matter mixing. Hence hF0iIMF for SSADs is located models with initial abundances of M10, M30, and M40 between the two estimations. Firstly we discuss the case added by proton of Xp = 0.01, 0.1, and 0.3, the OPFs in absence of matter mixing and then those with complete are similar profiles to model with the initial abundance of mixing. 20M⊙ model added by the same fraction of proton (i.e., same Xp) though the averaged OPFs, F0, are significantly 4.1.1. The Case in The Absence of Matter Mixing increased for models with massive progenitor (Table 2). To calculate hF i for SSADs, we need an estimation Form ˙ = 106, the profiles of the OPFs change as pro- 0 IMF of the total fallback mass with s-process seeds, M . An tons are injected. Appreciable amounts of the p-nuclei seed amount of fallback material has been estimated by WW95 which are deficient in model M20 are produced in SSADs. and F99 through numerical simulations of core collapse For X = 0.01 (M20P001), 92Mo and 138La are overpro- p and supernova explosion. Amounts of fallback material duced. The overproductions of 92Mo and 138La are more M are presented in Table 3 for the fallback models of prominent in M20P01 (Figure 6) compared with M20P001. f WW95 and F99. To operate the p-process in SSADs, fall- When X = 0.3 (model M20P03; Figure 7), 96Ru, 113Sn, p back material should contain the s-process seeds. Accord- and 114Sn become abundant because of very efficient pro- ingly, to calculate M , besides the amount of fallback ton captures. However, the overall profile of the OPFs be- seed matter, both the abundance distribution of the progeni- comes worse compared with the solar one. F drastically 0 tor and the peak temperature of the supernova shock are increases compared with the cases of small proton inclu- needed. In Table 3, we also show the mass coordinate of sion; F are equal to 67.68, 41.84, and 2882, for M20P001, 0 the base of oxygen burning layers, M and the mass co- M20P01, and M20P03, respectively. It should be noted Ob ordinate where the peak temperature is 2 × 109 K, M that 94Mo, 98Ru, and 115Sn are underproduced even if dest for the progenitor and explosion models with masses of 15, protons exist abundantly. 20, 25, and 40 M⊙ (Hashimoto 1995). All s-process seeds Concerning helium contamination of fallback material are assumed to be destroyed in the region of the mass co- via large-scale mixing, the OPFs are not appreciably ordinate M ≤ M and thus disk p-process can operate changed from those of M20 even if a significant fraction r dest only for fallback material with M > M . Hence we of 4He, up to 0.5, is added to the initial abundance of r dest can estimate M , which are also presented in Table 3, M20. Hence, amounts of p-nuclei produced inside SSADs seed for WW95 and F99. For the fallback model of WW95, are independent of an amount of 4He included in fallback M (30M⊙) is estimated as 2.41M⊙ provided that M material, while α elements, such as 44Ti, are enhanced. seed dest for the 30M⊙ progenitor is equal to that of the 25M⊙ progenitor. For the fallback model of F99, we set sim- 4. discussion ply Mseed(20M⊙)=0.5[Mseed(15M⊙)+Mseed(25M⊙)] and 1 M (30M⊙)= [2M (25M⊙)+ M (40M⊙)]. 4.1. Contribution of SSADs to Chemical Evolution of seed 3 seed seed P-Nuclei Moreover, some fractions of synthesized p-nuclei inside SSADs are ejected from the disks via jets and/or winds as We discuss contribution from SSADs to chemical evo- in many objects associated with an accretion disk (e.g., lution of p-nuclei to estimate relative contribution from Livio 1999). We assume that the ratio ǫ of the mass SSADs in respect to supernovae. In this aim we average ejection rate M˙ ej to the mass accretion rate is constant the overproduction factor F0 of p-nuclei produced by su- in time, or M˙ = ǫM˙ . Hence the total ejected mass is pernovae or SSADs using the initial mass function (IMF) ej also expressed as Mej = ǫMseed. The ratio ǫ are 0.001– ξ(M). The IMF-weighted OPF is calculated as 0.01 (Eggum, Coroniti & Katz 1988) and 0.03–0.1 (Ku-

Mu doh, Matsumoto & Shibata 1998) estimated from numer- F0(M)Mcont(M)ξ(M)dM Ml ical simulations of jets originated from an accretion disk. hF0iIMF = (6) R Mu ξ(M)dM However, ǫ may be larger as suggested by observations in Ml R 6 Fujimoto et al.

X-ray binaries; SS433 (Kotani 1997) and GRS 1915+105 assumed to decay to their daughter p-nuclei. When pro- (Fender & Pooley 2000; Belloni et al. 2000). ton is abundantly mixed into fallback material, the abun- 92 94 Using the calculated values of F0 for our SSAD models dances of Mo and Mo are not significantly changed 113 115 (Table 2), we evaluate hF0iIMF as 1.640 ǫ0.01 and 2.864 but In and Sn are largely enhanced. For M20P03 113 ǫ0.01 with the estimation of amounts of fallback matter of (Xp = 0.3), the ratio of the abundances of In, and 115 WW95 and F99, respectively, where ǫ0.01 = ǫ/0.01. Thus Sn after to before β-decays become 9.797 and 42.41, hF0iIMF for SSADs are smaller than that for supernovae respectively. However, the averaged OPFs, F0, are not (= 18.30) unless ǫ is as large as 0.1. It should be noted appreciably changed because of small OPFs of 113In and 115 that hF0iIMF slightly decreases for a steep IMF slope with Sn up to ∼ 0.07 before β-decays (Figures 3–7). Thus, β- ξ(M) ∝ M −2.7 (e.g., Kroupta 2002) and also reduce by decays after freeze out has only minor effect on estimation 30–50% if Mu = 30M⊙. of hF0iIMF discussed in §4.1.

4.1.2. The Case with Complete Matter Mixing 4.3. Neutron Star Kick We proceed the case of fallback with complete proton If a compact object breaks out a , mixing. We assume matter contains proton of Xp = 0.01 matter fallback onto the object ceases. Many observations throughout fallback. The proton mixing needs the hydro- reveal that have larger space velocities (200–1000 gen envelope of progenitors, which is decreased due to mass kms−1) than those of their progenitor (e.g., Lai et al. 2001 loss for massive progenitors (e.g., Chiosi & Maeder 1986). and references therein). Such high velocities are invoked to The upper limit Mu possibly decreases for cases with pro- kicks of nascent neutron stars via asymmetric supernova 5 ton mixing and are taken to be Mu = 35M⊙ (Fryer & explosions. The supercritical accretion (m> ˙ 10 ) investi- Kalogera 2001). As in the absence of matter mixing, we gated in the present paper is realized until about 4 years calculate hF0iIMF as 5.027 ǫ0.01 and 9.583 ǫ0.01 for the fall- after an explosion (Mineshige et al. 1997). The expansion back models of WW95 and F99, respectively. Here we velocity of the supernova remnant is much larger than the set F0(35M⊙)=0.5[F0(30M⊙) + F0(40M⊙)]. The en- typical kick velocity of pulsars. The material therefore hancement of hF0iIMF compared with no proton mixing is continues to fall back during the supercritical accretion of responsible for the increase in F0 for the models with pro- our interest. However, the later expansion of the remnant ton mixing (Table 2). Hence, in the case with complete is decelerated by ambient material from progenitor winds. mixing, the SSADs-origin p-nuclei are likely to compara- The eventually breaks through the supernova rem- bly contribute to the chemical evolution of p-nuclei as the nant and matter fallback onto it ceases. supernovae-origin p-nuclei. In particular, SSADs probably have significant contri- 5. concluding remarks 92 92 bution to the Mo evolution. Overproduction of Mo We have investigated the p-process nucleosynthesis in- takes place for anym ˙ (Figures 5-7). Accordingly, the over- side SSADs around a compact object of 1.4M⊙. Supernova production is realized inside SSADs throughout the dura- explosion of 20–40M⊙ progenitors is probably responsible tion in which a large fraction of fallback matter accretes for the p-process nucleosynthesis inside SSADs. The chem- onto a central compact object. Even for the cases of small 92 ical compositions of the accreting gas far from the central Xp, Mo is overproduced inside SSADs; This is the case > 92 object have been assumed to be those of the oxygen/neon of Xp ∼0.005. Thus, contribution to the Mo evolution layers of the progenitor in the model of 10, 20, 30, and is considerable for a small amount of proton ∼ 0.01M⊙ 5 40M⊙ stars. It is found that whenm ˙ > 10 the temper- mixed into the fallback matter of 0.1 to several M⊙. ature of the accreting gas attains to 2 − 3 × 109 K and On the other hand, 96Ru and 138La are overproduced 6 appreciable nuclear reactions take place to produce the p- only for the case ofm ˙ = 10 . The accretion rate of fall- nuclei. We have also estimated the OPFs of the p-nuclei back matter is declined to relatively small accretion rates 6 in the ejected material from the accretion disks via jets m˙ ∼ 10 at several months after the explosion (Mineshige and/or winds to compare the abundances of the ejected et al. 1997) and large amounts of fallback matter have al- matter with the solar abundances. The resultant p-nuclei ready accreted onto a central remnant. Therefore, only profiles have similar features to those for Type II super- a small amount of fallback matter are processed inside 96 138 novae (Rayet at al. 1995). The light and intermediate SSADs, which are enable to overproduce Ru and La. mass p-nuclei such as 92Mo, 94Mo, 96Ru, 98Ru, 114Sn, and 138La are underproduced. The amounts of p-nuclei and Abundance Change of P-Nuclei through Jets and 4.2. profiles of the OPFs ejected from SSADs depend on initial Winds abundance distributions of s-process seeds. In SSADs, p-nuclei are mainly produced in the region Moreover, for investigating the effects of proton and he- 8 20–70 rg form ˙ = 10 (Figure 2) where an accreting gas is lium contamination via large-scale mixing in a supernova mainly ejected via winds. Parent nuclei which decay into explosion of fallback material on the p-process nucleosyn- p-nuclei through β-decays are also expelled via winds and thesis, we have added some fractions of proton or helium thus enhance amounts of p-nuclei. Taking into account to the initial composition for the cases of 10, 20, 30, and the β-decays after freeze out, we estimate abundances of 40M⊙ progenitors and calculated the OPFs of the p-nuclei p-nuclei ejected from a SSAD. We find that p-nuclei other in the ejected material. It has been found that significant than 92Mo, 94Mo, 113In, and 115Sn are not appreciably fractions of 4He inclusion cause small changes in the OPFs. increased via β-decays of their parent nuclei; Their ratio Even for a small amount of proton included in fallback after to before β-decays are 1.100, 1.215, 13.77, and 18.33, material, p-nuclei are synthesized through not only pho- respectively, for M20. Here all the parent nuclei has been todisintegrations but radiative proton captures. The most P-Process inside SN-Driven Supercritical Disks 7 prominent is an enhancement of 92Mo. 138La is also over- the peculiar nucleosynthesis of the alpha-rich freeze out produced form ˙ = 106. If fallback matter includes abun- (Nagataki et al. 1997): The p-process will be affected by dant proton, appreciable amounts of the p-nuclei, such as jets as SN1987A. Some gamma-ray bursts are likely to 92Mo, 96Ru, 113Sn, and 114Sn, which are deficient in Type be caused by aspherical jet-induced supernova explosions II supernovae, can be produced form ˙ = 106, though the (MacFadyen & Woosley 1999; MacFadyen et al. 2001). overall profiles of the OPFs becomes worse compared with Numerical calculations indicate that in such explosions a the solar ones. SSAD is formed around a new-born compact object and a We have discussed the contribution from the p-process substantial amount of fallback (≃ 0.2M⊙) followed by mix- nucleosynthesis in SSADs to galactic chemical evolution ing takes place (Fryer & Heger 2000; H¨oflich, Khokhlov of p-nuclei. We conclude that p-process in SSADs com- & Wang 2001). Hence some gamma-ray bursts possibly parably contributes to chemical evolution of p-nuclei as accompany with the synthesis of p-nuclei; Our SSAD p- in supernovae if several percents of fallback matter are process model would be responsible for the synthesis of ejected from SSADs. In particular the p-process in SSADs p-nuclei in these bursts. may be important for the chemical evolution of 92Mo and possibly compensates the underproduction in Type II su- pernovae. Contribution from SSADs to the chemical evo- We are grateful to Dr. Takashi Yoshida for his helpful lution of 96Ru and 138La is unlikely to be significant. processing nuclear data and useful discussion. We also Numerical simulations of supernova-driven jets present thank the anonymous referee for useful comments.

REFERENCES

Anders, E., & Grevesse, N. 1989, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, Israerian, G., Rebolo, R., Basrl, G., Casares, J., & Martin, E. L. 197 1999, Nature, 401, 142 Arnould, M. 1976, A&A, 46, 117 Jaeger, M., Kunz, R., Mayer, A., Hammer, J.W., Staudt, G., Kratz, Arnould, M., Rayet, M., Hashimoto, M. 1998, in Tours Symposium K.-L., & Pfeiffer, B. 2001, Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 202501 on Nuclear Physics III, ed. M. Arnould et al. (New York: AIP), Junor, W., Biretta, J. A., & Livio, M. 1999, Nature, 401, 891 626 K¨appeler, F., et al. 1994, ApJ, 437, 396 Audi, G., & Wapstra, A. H. 1995, Nucl. Phys. A, 595, 409 Kifonidis, K., Plewa, T., Janka, H.-Th., & M¨uller, E. 2000, ApJ, Belloni, T., Migliari, S., & Fender, R. P. 2000, A&A, 358, L29 531, L123 Blinnikov, S., Lundqvist, P., Bartunov, O., Nomoto, K., & Iwamoto, Koike, O., Hashimoto, M., Arai, K., & Wanajo, S. 1999, A&A, 342, K. 2000, ApJ, 532, 1132 464 Chevalier, R. A. 1989, ApJ, 346, 847 Kotani, T. 1997, PhD thesis, The University Tokyo Chiosi, C., Maeder, A. 1986, ARA&A, 24, 329. Kudoh, T., Matsumoto, R., & Shibata, K. 1998, ApJ, 508, 186 Colgate, S. A. 1971, ApJ, 163, 221 Kozma, C., & Fransson, C. 1998, ApJ, 497, 431 Costa, V., Rayet, M., Zappal`a, R. A., & Arnould, M. 2000, A&A, Kroupta, P. 2002, Science, 295, 5552 358, 67 Kumagai, S., Shigeyama, T., Nomoto, K., Itoh, M., Nishimura, J., Douvion, T., Lagage, P. O., & Cesarsky, C. J. 1999, A&A, 352, & Tsuruta, S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 412 L111 Lai, D., Chernoff, D. F., & Cordes, J. M. 2001, ApJ, 549, 1111 Eggum, G. E., Coroniti, F. V., & Katz, J. I. 1988, ApJ, 330, 142 Livio, M. 1999, Phys. Rep., 311, 225 Fassia, A., Meikle, W. P. S., Geballe, T. R., Walton, N. A., Pollacco, MacFadyen, A. I., & Woosley, S. E. 1999, ApJ, 524, 262 D. L., Rutten, R. G. M., & Tinney, C. 1998, MNRAS, 299, 150 MacFadyen, A. I., Woosley, S. E., & Heger, A. 2001, ApJ, 550, 410 Fassia, A., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 325, 907 Mineshige, S., Nomura, H., Hirose, M., Nomoto, K., & Suzuki, T. Fender, R. P., & Pooley, G. G. 2000, MNRAS, 318, L1 1997, ApJ, 489, 227 Fryer, C. L. 1999, ApJ, 522, 413 Mitchell, R. C., Baron, E., Branch, D., Lundqvist, P., Blinnikov, S., Fryer, C. L., Colgate, S. A., & Pinto, P. A. 1999, ApJ, 511, 885 Hauschildt, P. H., & Pun, C. S. J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 979 Fryer, C. L., & Heger, A. 2000, ApJ, 541, 1033 M¨uller, E., Fryxell, B., & Arnett, D. 1991, A&A, 251, 505 Fryer, C. L., Kalogera, V. 2001, ApJ, 554, 548 Nagataki, S., Shimizu, T. M., & Sato, K. 1998, ApJ, 495, 413 Fujimoto, S., Arai, K., Matsuba, R., Hashimoto, M., Koike, O., & Nagataki, S., Hashimoto, M., Sato, K., Yamada, S. 1997, ApJ, 486, Mineshige, S. 2001, PASJ, 53, 509 1026 Fuller, G. M., Fowler, W. A., & Newman, M. J. 1980, ApJS, 42, 447 Podsiadlowski, P., Nomoto, K., Maeda, K., Nakamura, T., Mazzali, ———–. 1982a, ApJS, 48, 279 P., & Schmidt, B. 2002, ApJ, 567, 491 ———–. 1982b, ApJ, 252, 715 Popham, R., Woosley, S. E., & Fryer, C. 1999, ApJ, 518, 356 Fuller, G. M., & Meyer, B. S. 1995, ApJ, 453, 792 Prantzos, N., Hashimoto, M., & Nomoto, K. 1990a, A&A, 234, 211 Goriely, S., Arnould, M., Borzov, I., & Rayet, M. 2001, A&A, 375, Prantzos, N., Hashimoto, M., Rayet, M., & Arnould, M. 1990b, 35 A&A, 238, 455 Goriely, S., Jose, J., Hernanz, M., Rayet, M., & Arnould, M. 2002, Rauscher, T., & Thielemann, F.-K. 2000, At. Data Nucl. Data A&A, 383, L27 Tables, 75, 1 Hachisu, I., Matsuda, T., Nomoto, K., & Shigeyama, T. 1990, ApJ, ———–. 2001, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 79, 47 358, L57 Rayet, M., Arnould, M., Hashimoto, M., Prantzos, N., & Nomoto, Hashimoto, M. 1995, Prog. Theor. Phys., 94, 663 K. 1995, A&A, 298, 517 Hashimoto, M., Arai, K. 1985, Phys. Rep. Kumamoto Univ., 7, 1 Rayet, M., & Hashimoto, M. 2000, A&A, 354, 740 Heger, A., Langer, N., & Woosley, S. E. 2000, ApJ, 528, 368 Rayet, M., Prantzos, N., & Arnould, M. 1990, A&A, 227, 271 Herant, M., & Benz, W. 1992, ApJ, 387, 294 Salpeter, E.E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161 Hoffman, R. D., Woosley, S. E., Fuller, G. M., & Meyer, B. S. 1996, Schatz, H., et al. 1998, Phys. Rep., 294, 167 ApJ, 460, 478 Shigeyama, T., & Nomoto, K. 1990, ApJ, 360, 242 Horiguchi, T., Tachibana, T., & Katakura, J. 1996, Chart of The Spyromilio, J. 1991, MNRAS, 253, 25 Nuclides, Nuclear Data Center, Japan Atomic Energy Research ———–. 1994, MNRAS, 266, 61 Institute, Ibaraki Timmes, F. X. 1999, ApJS, 124, 241 Howard, W. M., Meyer, B. S., Woosley, S. E. 1991, ApJ, 373, L5 Umeda, H., & Nomoto, K. 2002, ApJ, 565, 385 Hawley, J. F. 2000, ApJ, 528, 462 Woosley, S. E., & Howard, W. M. 1978, ApJS, 36, 285 H¨oflich, P., Khokhlov, A., & Wang, L. 2001, in 20th Texas Woosley, S. E., Hartmann, D. H., Hoffman, R. D.,& Haxton, W. C. Symposium on Relativistic , ed. J. C. Wheeler & H. 1990, ApJ, 356, 272 Martel (New York:AIP), 459 Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. 1995, ApJS, 101, 181 (WW95) Hughes, J. P., Rakowski, C. E., Burrows, D. N., & Slane, P. O. 2000, ApJ, 528, L109 8 Fujimoto et al.

Table 1 Elements included in the nuclear reaction network.

elements A elements elements A H 1–3 Cu 56–71 La 121–139 He 3–6 Zn 57–74 Ce 126–142 Li 6–8 Ga 60–77 Pr 127–143 Be 7–10 Ge 66–76 Nd 132–150 B 8–12 As 70–77 Pm 133–151 C 11–14 Se 71–82 Sm 136–154 N 12–15 Br 74–83 Eu 137–155 O 14–20 Kr 75–86 Gd 140–160 F 17–22 Rb 78–87 Tb 143–161 Ne 17–24 Sr 80–88 Dy 146–164 Na 20–27 Y 82–92 Ho 149–165 Mg 20–29 Zr 84–96 Er 151–170 Al 22–31 Nb 86–97 Tm 152–171 Si 24–34 Mo 88–100 Yb 154–176 P 27–38 Tc 90–101 Lu 156–177 S 28–42 Ru 92–104 Hf 158–180 Cl 31–45 Rh 94–105 Ta 164–181 Ar 32–48 Pd 96–110 W 166–186 K 35–49 Ag 98–111 Re 168–187 Ca 36–50 Cd 100–116 Os 170–192 Sc 39–51 In 103–117 Ir 172–193 Ti 40–53 Sn 105–124 Pt 174–198 V 43–55 Sb 106–125 Au 178–200 Cr 44–58 Te 108–130 Hg 180–204 Mn 46–64 I 114–131 Tl 186–205 Fe 47–65 Xe 116–136 Pb 190–208 Co 50–66 Cs 117–137 Bi 192–209 Ni 51–68 Ba 120–138 ······

Table 2

Overproduction factor F0 ejected from SSADs for the progenitors of 10, 20, 30, and 40 M⊙ and for various values of proton contamination Xp.

a MMS F0 (M⊙) Xp =0 Xp =0.01 Xp =0.1 Xp =0.3 10 18.15 26.73 21.40 18.03 20 49.64 161.1 88.46 89.03 30 102.0 461.8 259.1 235.9 40 138.3 698.5 422.3 332.2

a 8 All F0 are calculated for the case ofm ˙ = 10 . P-Process inside SN-Driven Supercritical Disks 9 Table 3 Various masses of progenitors and fallback matter

WW95 model F99 model a b c d e f d e f MMS MOb Mdest Mf Mrem Mseed Mf Mrem Mseed 15 1.37 1.55 0.11 1.43 0 0.2 1.52 0 20 1.67 1.8 0.32 2.06 0.26 ········· 25 1.48 1.8 0.29 2.07 0.27 3.8 5.58 2.0 30 ······ 2.41 4.24 ············ 40 2.36 3.5 8.36 10.34 4.84 10.3 11.01 6.8

Note. — All masses are in units of M⊙. aProgenitor mass on the main-sequence. bLocation of the base of oxygen burning shell from Hashimoto (1995). cLocation where the peak temperature of supernova shock is equal to 2 ×109 K from Hashimoto (1995). dFallback mass. eRemnant mass after fallback. f Estimated fallback mass with s-process seeds for p-nuclei.

1.0e-02

1.0e-03

1.0e-04

1.0e-05

1.0e-06

1.0e-07

Mass fraction 1.0e-08

1.0e-09

1.0e-10

1.0e-11 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Mass number Fig. 1.— The initial abundances of models M10 (dashed line) M20 (solid line), and M40 (thick-solid line). The filled circles are the solar abundance (Anders & Grevesse 1989). 10 Fujimoto et al.

1.0e+04 74 Se 1.0e+03

1.0e+02 92 152 Mo Gd 180 1.0e+01 Ta

solar 1.0e+00 138 La X/X 1.0e-01

1.0e-02

196 1.0e-03 Hg

1.0e-04 30 50 100 200 r/rg Fig. 2.— The abundance profiles of representative p-nuclei inside a SSAD for M20. The abscissa is the radius of the fallback disk in units of the Schwarzschild radius. The solid, thick-solid, dashed, thick-dashed, dotted, and thick-dotted lines represent 74Se, 92Mo, 138La, 152Gd, 180Ta, and 196Hg, respectively. P-Process inside SN-Driven Supercritical Disks 11

100

Se

10

Kr Sr Ba Sm Ta Os 1 Xe Hf Ce Yb W Hg Pd Cd Sn Te Gd Er Pt La 0.1 Dy Over production factor

Mo Ru In 0.01 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Mass number 8 Fig. 3.— OPFs of 35 p-nuclei for M20 withm ˙ = 10 . F0 is equal to 49.64. 12 Fujimoto et al.

100

10 Os

Se Ba Sm Ta Te Hf Hg Xe Yb W Pt 1 Sr Cd Sn Pd Ce Er Kr Dy

La 0.1 Gd Over production factor Ru Mo In

0.01 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Mass number

Fig. 4.— Same as figure 3, but for M10. F0 is equal to 18.51. P-Process inside SN-Driven Supercritical Disks 13

100

Kr

10 Se Sr

Mo 1 Ba Sm Xe Hf Ta Os Cd Te Ce Yb Pt Hg 0.1 Pd Sn Gd W

Over production factor Dy Er Ru La 0.01 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Mass number

Fig. 5.— Same as figure 3, but for M20P001. F0 is equal to 157.7. 14 Fujimoto et al.

100

Kr 10 Se Sr La Mo

1 Ce Ta Gd Sm W Os Hf Xe Ba Cd Sn Te Yb Pt Hg 0.1 Ru Over production factor In Pd Dy Er

0.01 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Mass number 6 Fig. 6.— OPFs of 35 p-nuclei for M20P01 withm ˙ = 10 . F0 is equal to 41.84 P-Process inside SN-Driven Supercritical Disks 15

100

Cd Sn 10 Mo Pd Ru

1 Kr Sr

0.1 Se Xe La Over production factor

Ta Te Ba 0.01 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Mass number

Fig. 7.— Same as figure 6, but for model M20P03. F0 is equal to 2882