DOCSLIB.ORG

9Th Edition 1. Will the Sun Shed Most of Its Mass, And, If So, What Is That

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
9Th Edition 1. Will the Sun Shed Most of Its Mass, And, If So, What Is That Astronomy HOMEWORK Chapter 13 - 9th Edition 1. Will the Sun shed most of its mass, and, if so, what is that event called? a. yes, as a planetary nebula, b. yes, as a supernova, c. yes, as a white dwarf, d. yes, as a neutron blast, e. no a. yes, as a planetary nebula. The white dwarf is what is left nor become a neutron star. 2. A white dwarf is composed of primarily a. neutrons, b. hydrogen and helium, c. iron, d. cosmic rays, e. carbon and oxygen. e. carbon and xygen. 3. What prevents a neutron star from collapsing? a. hydrogen fusion, b. friction, c. electron degeneracy pressure, d. neutron degeneracy pressure, e. helium fusion d. neutron degeneracy pressure. 7. What is a planetary nebula, and how does it form? Answer: A planetary nebula is a cloud of gas and dust blown off a low-mass (less than 8 M ) star near the end of its life. It forms because the radiation pressure from the star blows off the star's outer layers. Notice that a \planetary nebula" has nothing to do with planets; the term is left over from the 1780s. 8. What is the Chandrasekhar limit? Answer: The Chandrasekhar limit is the maximum mass that can be sustained by electron degeneracy pressure. Its value is 1:4 M . It marks the mass limit of a White Dwarf. 9. What is a neutron star? Answer: A neutron star is a very compact stellar remnant consisting almost entirely of neu- trons. Typical mass 2 M , typical size 10 km, typical density 200 trillion times that of water. 10. Compare a white dwarf and a neutron star. Which of these stellar corpses is more common? Why? Answer: White Dwarf Neutron Star Typical Radius (km) 5000 10 Progenitor 0.8 to 8 M star 8 to 25 M star Density (compared to water) 106 1014 Composition Carbon and Oxygen Neutrons White dwarfs are more common since lower mass stars are more common. 19. What is the difference between Type Ia and Type II supernovae? Answer: Physically, the difference is that a Type II supernova occurs in a high-mass star when the mass of the iron core reaches the Chandrasekhar limit; while a Type Ia supernova occurs when a white dwarf, accreting from a companion, attains a mass of the Chandrasekhar limit. Observationally, the Type II has hydrogen lines, while the Type Ia does not; and the light curves (time histories of luminosity) are different. As a result of these differences, and most important to astronomy as a whole, all Type Ia supernovae are \identical," so this is a \standard candle" and its distance can be determined via the formula B = L=4πD2, where B is the apparent brightness. The ability to measure vast distances is crucial to understanding the universe. 23. What prevents thermonuclear fusion from occurring at the center of a white dwarf? If no thermonuclear reactions take place at its core, why doesn't the star collapse? Answer: A white dwarf consists of carbon and oxygen. Nuclear reactions involving these nuclei require a temperature of 600 million K (pg 387). This is a lot hotter than the 10 million K for hydrogen fusion because the carbon nuclei are heavier and have a charge of +6, which gets squared. Oxygen, with a charge of +8, is even more difficult to fuse. The interior of a white dwarf never gets this hot, so these nuclear reactions do not occur. So, what does support it? Electron degeneracy pressure (EDP), our old friend. The core of a white dwarf might be at several hundred million K, but this extremely high temperature contributes only a small amount of the pressure, compared to EDP. As a result, as a white dwarf cools down, the decrease in total pressure (EDP plus thermodynamic) is slight, so the white dwarf does not shrink appreciably as it cools. 35. What if: The Sun were a B-type star, rather than a G-type star? Assuming that the Earth orbiting the B-type star had the same composition and orbital distance as it has today, what would be different on Earth? If you answered this question for Chapter 11, you might want to see how material from this chapter (Chapter 13) enhanced your answer. Answer: If it were a B-type main-sequence star, its mass would be around 10 to 15X the Sun's mass, so the year would be 3-4X shorter. Since the luminosity would be 5000-10,000X its actual luminosity, it wouldn't matter. Scorched cinder Earth. Moving Earth farther away (80-100 AU, say) would recover our present temperature, but the dose of ultraviolet would inhibit land life-forms. Chapter 13 pointed out that the lifetime of such a star would be only 15 million years. Earth hadn't even formed in the first 15 million years. So: a B-type star isn't such a good idea..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2.5 Dimensional Radiative Transfer Modeling of Proto-Planetary Nebula Dust Shells with 2-DUST
    PLANETARY NEBULAE: THEIR EVOLUTION AND ROLE IN THE UNIVERSE fA U Symposium, Vol. 209, 2003 S. Kwok, M. Dopita, and R. Sutherland, eds. 2.5 Dimensional Radiative Transfer Modeling of Proto-Planetary Nebula Dust Shells with 2-DUST Toshiya Ueta & Margaret Meixner Department of Astronomy, MC-221 , University of fllinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA ueta@astro. uiuc.edu, [email protected]. edu Abstract. Our observing campaign of proto-planetary nebula (PPN) dust shells has shown that the structure formation in planetary nebu- lae (PNs) begins as early as the late asymptotic. giant branch (AGB) phase due to intrinsically axisymmetric superwind. We describe our latest numerical efforts with a multi-dimensional dust radiative transfer code, 2-DUST, in order to explain the apparent dichotomy of the PPN mor- phology at the mid-IR and optical, which originates most likely from the optical depth of the shell combined with the effect of inclination angle. 1. Axisymmetric PPN Shells and Single Density Distribution Model Since the PPN phase predates the period of final PN shaping due to interactions of the stellar winds, we can investigate the origin of the PN structure formation by observationally establishing the material distribution in the PPN shells, in which pristine fossil records of AGB mass loss histories are preserved in their benign circumstellar environment. Our mid-IR and optical imaging surveys of PPN candidates in the past several years (Meixner at al. 1999; Ueta et al. 2000) have revealed that (1) PPN shells are intrinsically axisymmetric most likely due to equatorially-enhanced superwind mass loss at the end of the AGB phase and (2) varying degrees of equatorial enhancement in superwind would result in different optical depths of the PPN shell, thereby heavily influencing the mid-IR and optical morphologies.
    [Show full text]
  • White Dwarfs
    Chandra X-Ray Observatory X-Ray Astronomy Field Guide White Dwarfs White dwarfs are among the dimmest stars in the universe. Even so, they have commanded the attention of astronomers ever since the first white dwarf was observed by optical telescopes in the middle of the 19th century. One reason for this interest is that white dwarfs represent an intriguing state of matter; another reason is that most stars, including our sun, will become white dwarfs when they reach their final, burnt-out collapsed state. A star experiences an energy crisis and its core collapses when the star's basic, non-renewable energy source - hydrogen - is used up. A shell of hydrogen on the edge of the collapsed core will be compressed and heated. The nuclear fusion of the hydrogen in the shell will produce a new surge of power that will cause the outer layers of the star to expand until it has a diameter a hundred times its present value. This is called the "red giant" phase of a star's existence. A hundred million years after the red giant phase all of the star's available energy resources will be used up. The exhausted red giant will puff off its outer layer leaving behind a hot core. This hot core is called a Wolf-Rayet type star after the astronomers who first identified these objects. This star has a surface temperature of about 50,000 degrees Celsius and is A composite furiously boiling off its outer layers in a "fast" wind traveling 6 million image of the kilometers per hour.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Nebulae Jacob Arnold AY230, Fall 2008
    Jacob Arnold Planetary Nebulae Jacob Arnold AY230, Fall 2008 1 PNe Formation Low mass stars (less than 8 M) will travel through the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) of the familiar HR-diagram. During this stage of evolution, energy generation is primarily relegated to a shell of helium just outside of the carbon-oxygen core. This thin shell of fusing He cannot expand against the outer layer of the star, and rapidly heats up while also quickly exhausting its reserves and transferring its head outwards. When the He is depleted, Hydrogen burning begins in a shell just a little farther out. Over time, helium builds up again, and very abruptly begins burning, leading to a shell-helium-flash (thermal pulse). During the thermal-pulse AGB phase, this process repeats itself, leading to mass loss at the extended outer envelope of the star. The pulsations extend the outer layers of the star, causing the temperature to drop below the condensation temperature for grain formation (Zijlstra 2006). Grains are driven off the star by radiation pressure, bringing gas with them through collisions. The mass loss from pulsating AGB stars is oftentimes referred to as a wind. For AGB stars, the surface gravity of the star is quite low, and wind speeds of ~10 km/s are more than sufficient to drive off mass. At some point, a super wind develops that removes the envelope entirely, a phenomenon not yet fully understood (Bernard-Salas 2003). The central, primarily carbon-oxygen core is thus exposed. These cores can have temperatures in the hundreds of thousands of Kelvin, leading to a very strong ionizing source.
    [Show full text]
  • Supernovae Sparked by Dark Matter in White Dwarfs
    Supernovae Sparked By Dark Matter in White Dwarfs Javier F. Acevedog and Joseph Bramanteg;y gThe Arthur B. McDonald Canadian Astroparticle Physics Research Institute, Department of Physics, Engineering Physics, and Astronomy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2S8, Canada yPerimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 2Y5, Canada November 27, 2019 Abstract It was recently demonstrated that asymmetric dark matter can ignite supernovae by collecting and collapsing inside lone sub-Chandrasekhar mass white dwarfs, and that this may be the cause of Type Ia supernovae. A ball of asymmetric dark matter accumulated inside a white dwarf and collapsing under its own weight, sheds enough gravitational potential energy through scattering with nuclei, to spark the fusion reactions that precede a Type Ia supernova explosion. In this article we elaborate on this mechanism and use it to place new bounds on interactions between nucleons 6 16 and asymmetric dark matter for masses mX = 10 − 10 GeV. Interestingly, we find that for dark matter more massive than 1011 GeV, Type Ia supernova ignition can proceed through the Hawking evaporation of a small black hole formed by the collapsed dark matter. We also identify how a cold white dwarf's Coulomb crystal structure substantially suppresses dark matter-nuclear scattering at low momentum transfers, which is crucial for calculating the time it takes dark matter to form a black hole. Higgs and vector portal dark matter models that ignite Type Ia supernovae are explored. arXiv:1904.11993v3 [hep-ph] 26 Nov 2019 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Dark matter capture, thermalization and collapse in white dwarfs 4 2.1 Dark matter capture .
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Astro2010 Recommendations on Variable Star Science
    The Impact of the Astro2010 Recommendations on Variable Star Science Corresponding Authors Lucianne M. Walkowicz Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley [email protected] phone: (510) 642–6931 Andrew C. Becker Department of Astronomy, University of Washington [email protected] phone: (206) 685–0542 Authors Scott F. Anderson, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Joshua S. Bloom, Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley Leonid Georgiev, Universidad Autonoma de Mexico Josh Grindlay, Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Steve Howell, National Optical Astronomy Observatory Knox Long, Space Telescope Science Institute Anjum Mukadam, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Andrej Prsa,ˇ Villanova University Joshua Pepper, Villanova University Arne Rau, California Institute of Technology Branimir Sesar, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Nicole Silvestri, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Nathan Smith, Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley Keivan Stassun, Vanderbilt University Paula Szkody, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Science Frontier Panels: Stars and Stellar Evolution (SSE) February 16, 2009 Abstract The next decade of survey astronomy has the potential to transform our knowledge of variable stars. Stellar variability underpins our knowledge of the cosmological distance ladder, and provides direct tests of stellar formation and evolution theory. Variable stars can also be used to probe the fundamental physics of gravity and degenerate material in ways that are otherwise impossible in the laboratory. The computational and engineering advances of the past decade have made large–scale, time–domain surveys an immediate reality. Some surveys proposed for the next decade promise to gather more data than in the prior cumulative history of astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Semester 2010 Exam 3 – Answers a Planetary Nebula Is A
    ASTR 1120H – Spring Semester 2010 Exam 3 – Answers PART I (70 points total) – 14 short answer questions (5 points each): 1. What is a planetary nebula? How long can a planetary nebula be observed? A planetary nebula is a luminous shell of gas ejected from an old, low- mass star. It can be observed for approximately 50,000 years; after that it its gases will have ceased to glow and it will simply fade from view. 2. What is a white dwarf star? How does a white dwarf change over time? A white dwarf star is a low-mass star that has exhausted all its nuclear fuel and contracted to a size roughly equal to the size of the Earth. It is supported against further contraction by electron degeneracy pressure. As a white dwarf ages, though, it will radiate, thereby cooling and getting less luminous. 3. Name at least three differences between Type Ia supernovae and Type II supernovae. Type Ia SN are intrinsically brighter than Type II SN. Type II SN show hydrogen emission lines; Type Ia SN don't. Type II SN are thought to arise from core collapse of a single, massive star. Type Ia SN are thought to arise from accretion from a binary companion onto a white dwarf star, pushing the white dwarf beyond the Chandrasekhar limit and causing a nuclear detonation that destroys the white dwarf. 4. Why was SN 1987A so important? SN 1987A was the first naked-eye SN in almost 400 years. It was the first SN for which a precursor star could be identified.
    [Show full text]
  • SHAPING the WIND of DYING STARS Noam Soker
    Pleasantness Review* Department of Physics, Technion, Israel The role of jets in the common envelope evolution (CEE) and in the grazing envelope evolution (GEE) Cambridge 2016 Noam Soker •Dictionary translation of my name from Hebrew to English (real!): Noam = Pleasantness Soker = Review A short summary JETS See review accepted for publication by astro-ph in May 2016: Soker, N., 2016, arXiv: 160502672 A very short summary JFM See review accepted for publication by astro-ph in May 2016: Soker, N., 2016, arXiv: 160502672 A full summary • Jets are unavoidable when the companion enters the common envelope. They are most likely to continue as the secondary star enters the envelop, and operate under a negative feedback mechanism (the Jet Feedback Mechanism - JFM). • Jets: Can be launched outside and Secondary inside the envelope star RGB, AGB, Red Giant Massive giant primary star Jets Jets Jets: And on its surface Secondary star RGB, AGB, Red Giant Massive giant primary star Jets A full summary • Jets are unavoidable when the companion enters the common envelope. They are most likely to continue as the secondary star enters the envelop, and operate under a negative feedback mechanism (the Jet Feedback Mechanism - JFM). • When the jets mange to eject the envelope outside the orbit of the secondary star, the system avoids a common envelope evolution (CEE). This is the Grazing Envelope Evolution (GEE). Points to consider (P1) The JFM (jet feedback mechanism) is a negative feedback cycle. But there is a positive ingredient ! In the common envelope evolution (CEE) more mass is removed from zones outside the orbit.
    [Show full text]
  • CHIME and Probing the Origin of Fast Radio Bursts by Liam Dean Connor a Thesis Submitted in Conformity with the Requirements
    CHIME and Probing the Origin of Fast Radio Bursts by Liam Dean Connor A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics University of Toronto c Copyright 2016 by Liam Dean Connor Abstract CHIME and Probing the Origin of Fast Radio Bursts Liam Dean Connor Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics University of Toronto 2016 The time-variable long-wavelength sky harbours a number of known but unsolved astro- physical problems, and surely many more undiscovered phenomena. With modern tools such problems will become tractable, and new classes of astronomical objects will be revealed. These tools include digital telescopes made from powerful computing clusters, and improved theoretical methods. In this thesis we employ such devices to understand better several puzzles in the time-domain radio sky. Our primary focus is on the origin of fast radio bursts (FRBs), a new class of transients of which there seem to be thousands per sky per day. We offer a model in which FRBs are extragalactic but non-cosmological pulsars in young supernova remnants. Since this theoretical work was done, observations have corroborated the picture of FRBs as young rotating neutron stars, including the non-Poissonian repetition of FRB 121102. We also present statistical arguments regard- ing the nature and location of FRBs. These include reinstituting the classic V=Vmax-test @ log N to measure the brightness distribution of FRBs, i.e., constraining @ log S . We find consis- tency with a Euclidean distribution. This means current observations cannot distinguish between a cosmological population and a more local uniform population, unless added assumptions are made.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Stars: End State of High-Mass Stars
    Chapter 13: The Stellar Graveyard 3/31/2009 Habbal Astro110http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2001/1227/index.html Chapter 13 Lecture 26 1 Low mass star High mass (>8 Msun) star Ends as a white dwarf. Ends in a supernova, leaving a neutron star or black hole 3/31/2009 Habbal Astro110 Chapter 13 Lecture 26 2 White dwarfs: end state of low-mass stars • Inert remaining cores of dead low-mass stars. • No internal energy generation: start hot and steadily cool off. Optical image X-ray image Sirius A Sirius A high mass star high mass star Sirius B Sirius B white dwarf white dwarf 3/31/2009 Habbal Astro110 Chapter 13 Lecture 26 3 White dwarfs are supported against gravitational collapse by electron degeneracy pressure 3/31/2009 Habbal Astro110 Chapter 13 Lecture 26 4 A 1 MSun white dwarf is about the same size as the Earth… ⇒ A teaspoon of white dwarf material would weight 10 tons! 3/31/2009 Habbal Astro110 Chapter 13 Lecture 26 5 More massive white dwarfs are smaller! Mass ⇒ gravitational compression ⇒ density ⇒ radius Chandrasekhar limit: white dwarfs cannot be more massive than 1.4 MSun 3/31/2009 Habbal Astro110 Chapter 13 Lecture 26 6 White dwarfs in binary systems • WDʼs gravity can accrete gas from companion star. • Accreted gas can erupt in a short modest burst of nuclear fusion: novae • However, WDs cannot BANG! be more than 1.4 MSun. • If WD accretes too much gas, it is destroyed in a white dwarf supernova 3/31/2009 Habbal Astro110 Chapter 13 Lecture 26 7 Nova: a nuclear explosion on the surface of a WD, gas is expelled and system returns to normal 3/31/2009 Habbal Astro110 Chapter 13 Lecture 26 8 One way to tell supernova types apart is with a light curve showing how the luminosity changes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Magnetar Model for the Hydrogen-Rich Super-Luminous Supernova Iptf14hls Luc Dessart
    A&A 610, L10 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732402 Astronomy & © ESO 2018 Astrophysics LETTER TO THE EDITOR A magnetar model for the hydrogen-rich super-luminous supernova iPTF14hls Luc Dessart Unidad Mixta Internacional Franco-Chilena de Astronomía (CNRS, UMI 3386), Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Chile, Camino El Observatorio 1515, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile e-mail: [email protected] Received 2 December 2017 / Accepted 14 January 2018 ABSTRACT Transient surveys have recently revealed the existence of H-rich super-luminous supernovae (SLSN; e.g., iPTF14hls, OGLE-SN14-073) that are characterized by an exceptionally high time-integrated bolometric luminosity, a sustained blue optical color, and Doppler- broadened H I lines at all times. Here, I investigate the effect that a magnetar (with an initial rotational energy of 4 × 1050 erg and 13 field strength of 7 × 10 G) would have on the properties of a typical Type II supernova (SN) ejecta (mass of 13.35 M , kinetic 51 56 energy of 1:32 × 10 erg, 0.077 M of Ni) produced by the terminal explosion of an H-rich blue supergiant star. I present a non-local thermodynamic equilibrium time-dependent radiative transfer simulation of the resulting photometric and spectroscopic evolution from 1 d until 600 d after explosion. With the magnetar power, the model luminosity and brightness are enhanced, the ejecta is hotter and more ionized everywhere, and the spectrum formation region is much more extended. This magnetar-powered SN ejecta reproduces most of the observed properties of SLSN iPTF14hls, including the sustained brightness of −18 mag in the R band, the blue optical color, and the broad H I lines for 600 d.
    [Show full text]
  • Nucleosynthesis
    Nucleosynthesis Nucleosynthesis is the process that creates new atomic nuclei from pre-existing nucleons, primarily protons and neutrons. The first nuclei were formed about three minutes after the Big Bang, through the process called Big Bang nucleosynthesis. Seventeen minutes later the universe had cooled to a point at which these processes ended, so only the fastest and simplest reactions occurred, leaving our universe containing about 75% hydrogen, 24% helium, and traces of other elements such aslithium and the hydrogen isotope deuterium. The universe still has approximately the same composition today. Heavier nuclei were created from these, by several processes. Stars formed, and began to fuse light elements to heavier ones in their cores, giving off energy in the process, known as stellar nucleosynthesis. Fusion processes create many of the lighter elements up to and including iron and nickel, and these elements are ejected into space (the interstellar medium) when smaller stars shed their outer envelopes and become smaller stars known as white dwarfs. The remains of their ejected mass form theplanetary nebulae observable throughout our galaxy. Supernova nucleosynthesis within exploding stars by fusing carbon and oxygen is responsible for the abundances of elements between magnesium (atomic number 12) and nickel (atomic number 28).[1] Supernova nucleosynthesis is also thought to be responsible for the creation of rarer elements heavier than iron and nickel, in the last few seconds of a type II supernova event. The synthesis of these heavier elements absorbs energy (endothermic process) as they are created, from the energy produced during the supernova explosion. Some of those elements are created from the absorption of multiple neutrons (the r-process) in the period of a few seconds during the explosion.
    [Show full text]
  • How Supernovae Became the Basis of Observational Cosmology
    Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage, 19(2), 203–215 (2016). HOW SUPERNOVAE BECAME THE BASIS OF OBSERVATIONAL COSMOLOGY Maria Victorovna Pruzhinskaya Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire, Université Clermont Auvergne, Université Blaise Pascal, CNRS/IN2P3, Clermont-Ferrand, France; and Sternberg Astronomical Institute of Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky prospect 13, Russia. Email: [email protected] and Sergey Mikhailovich Lisakov Laboratoire Lagrange, UMR7293, Université Nice Sophia-Antipolis, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Boulevard de l'Observatoire, CS 34229, Nice, France. Email: [email protected] Abstract: This paper is dedicated to the discovery of one of the most important relationships in supernova cosmology—the relation between the peak luminosity of Type Ia supernovae and their luminosity decline rate after maximum light. The history of this relationship is quite long and interesting. The relationship was independently discovered by the American statistician and astronomer Bert Woodard Rust and the Soviet astronomer Yury Pavlovich Pskovskii in the 1970s. Using a limited sample of Type I supernovae they were able to show that the brighter the supernova is, the slower its luminosity declines after maximum. Only with the appearance of CCD cameras could Mark Phillips re-inspect this relationship on a new level of accuracy using a better sample of supernovae. His investigations confirmed the idea proposed earlier by Rust and Pskovskii. Keywords: supernovae, Pskovskii, Rust 1 INTRODUCTION However, from the moment that Albert Einstein (1879–1955; Whittaker, 1955) introduced into the In 1998–1999 astronomers discovered the accel- equations of the General Theory of Relativity a erating expansion of the Universe through the cosmological constant until the discovery of the observations of very far standard candles (for accelerating expansion of the Universe, nearly a review see Lipunov and Chernin, 2012).
    [Show full text]