DOCSLIB.ORG

Up to ±182,000 SF Build-To-Suit Near SCTAC

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Up to ±182,000 SF Build-To-Suit Near SCTAC For Lease Up to ±182,000 SF Build-to-Suit near SCTAC 6901 Augusta Rd, Greenville, SC John Montgomery Garrett Scott, SIOR Brockton Hall, SIOR Dillon Swayngim Vice President Vice President Vice President Senior Brokerage Associate +1 864 527 5422 +1 864 527 5453 +1 864 527 5441 +1 864 527 5456 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Property Highlights ±25-acre opportunity for industrial owner/user minutes from downtown Greenville This ±25-acre property is situated in a highly visible area within AD Asb ury the established South Carolina Technology and Aviation Center Dr ive (SCTAC) industrial corridor along US Hwy 25/Augusta Rd. The site represents an excellent opportunity for industrial development with all utilities on-site, main road frontage, signalized intersection access, flat topography and proximity to downtown amenties. AD Asbury Drive Key Information Cleared with flat Proposed ±91,000 SF up to Status topography building size ±182,000 SF Master plan and due Tax ID # 0401000203700 Site planning diligence package C-TPAT/ Available based on Developer Dexter Companies Foreign Trade client need Zone 7” slab; concrete tilt- Duke Energy, walls; 30’ - 36’ clear Piedmont Natural Proposed height; TPO roofing; Utilities Gas, Metro B Water, construction ESFR protection; Metro B Sewer 50’ x 52’ column spacing; 60’ speed bays New Sunset Ln Regional Advantages This build-to-suit site is centrally located between the I-85 main corridor and I-185 connector in Greenville, SC. This location offers multiple trucking routes to key logistics points throughout 6901 Augusta Rd the region including the Inland Port in Greer and GSP International Airport approximately 15 miles to the north on I-85. Greenville, SC The Greenville-Spartanburg region is quickly growing into a Southeast hub, with the ability to reach ±94 million consumers within a one-day drive and the deepest port on the east coast, The Port of Charleston, only a 3-hour drive away. Spartanburg Greer Greenville I-185 ±2 miles I-85 ±2.8 miles SCTAC ±0.1 miles GSP Int’l Airport ±14.5 miles Inland Port Greer ±18.5 miles Port of Charleston ±210 miles Spartanburg ±33 miles Charlotte ±104 miles Atlanta ±145 miles Industrial Infrastructure ±151,700 ±94 million 24 hours Top 10 Rail LIfts at Inland Consumers within Rail turnaround from Industrial market in Port Greer one-day drive Port of Charleston to the United States Inland Port Prime frontage on Greenville’s industrial corridor The SCTAC industrial area is a unique, leading-edge business and technology airpark located 6901 Augusta Rd in Greenville, SC. As a top 10 pro-business state, South Carolina has become a global breeding ground for innovative companies dedicated to advanced manufacturing, research, and Greenville, SC innovation. SCTAC is a former Air Force base consisting of ±2,600 acres now recognized as a major aircraft maintenance center and corporate park. Greenville Technical College Stevens Aerospace WabTec Lockheed Martin Multi-Pack Donaldson Center Airport Encore Container 3M Roy Metal Finishing Lockheed Martin Fastenal Sun City GE Solvay Orion Distribution Michelin Custom Goods Orbis Kimura Berry Plastics Pharmaceutical Associates JTEKT Eastern Distribution Magna Southeastern Paperboard Michelin Americold Logistics Sunland Logistics 7A Magna 103 companies; ±2,600-acre Airport with Industries include aerospace, Skilled labor 99 global industrial area ±8,000-ft runway aviation, automotive, advanced pool; ±4,100 current manufacturing employees 6901 Augusta Rd Greenville, SC John Montgomery Vice President +1 864 527 5422 [email protected] Garrett Scott, SIOR Vice President +1 864 527 5453 [email protected] Brockton Hall, SIOR Vice President +1 864 527 5441 [email protected] Colliers Dillon Swayngim 145 W. Main St | Ste 300 Senior Brokerage Associate Spartanburg, SC 29306 +1 864 527 5456 P: +1 864 297 4950 [email protected] Copyright © 2021 Colliers International. Information herein has been obtained from sources deemed reliable, however its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The user is required to conduct their own due diligence and verification..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SC EV Market Study
    SC EV Market Study 1 South Carolina Electric Vehicle Market Study Introduction 4 Current Assessment 5 Trends and Future Outlook 12 Implementation 17 Infrastructure Development 17 Educational Campaign: Plug in SC 22 1 Background Palmetto Clean Fuels (PCF) is an initiative of the South Carolina Office of Regulatory Staff - Energy Office (Energy Office). PCF is one of more than 100 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Clean Cities designees and represents the entire state of South Carolina. Clean Cities is a locally based, voluntary public/private partnership created to promote energy use in the transportation sector that is clean, safe, sustainable, and less dependent upon foreign energy sources. Clean Cities builds on local initiatives and partnerships as well as nationwide networks to achieve its goals. By combining local decision- making with voluntary action by partners, this grassroots community action group seeks to create effective programs that support a sustainable nationwide alternative fuels market. PCF works to increase the use of alternative fuels and advanced vehicle technologies and strives to help public and private entities— as well as individuals— lower fuel costs, improve air quality, and reduce petroleum consumption. PCF also promotes idle reduction, fuel economy measures, vehicle miles traveled reductions, and bicycle and pedestrian efforts. 1 2 Introduction This study focuses on one aspect of PCF work—electric vehicles (EV). It builds on several regional studies as well as the past efforts of the organization, Plug-In Carolina. Plug-In Carolina, a registered non-profit, was selected to manage a program to install Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) funded with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) through the Energy Office.
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 32 • NUM BER 189 Friday, September 29, 1967 • Washington, D.C
    FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 32 • NUM BER 189 Friday, September 29, 1967 • Washington, D.C. Pages 13629-13688 Agencies in this issue— The President Agricultural Research Service Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Army Department Atomic Energy Commission Business and Defense Services Administration Civil Aeronautics Board Civil Sërvice Commission Coast Guard Commerce Department Consumer and Marketing Service Federal Aviation Administration Federal Communications Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Trade Commission Forest Service General Services Administration International Commerce Bureau Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau National Park Service Post Office Department Public Health Service Securities and Exchange Commission Social Security Administration Tariff Commission Treasury Department Detailed list of Contents appears inside. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States Annual volumes containing the public messages and statements, news conferences, and other selected papers released by the White House. Volumes for the following years are now available: HARRY S. TRUMAN 1945 ___ $5. 50 1949 . _ $6.75 1946 __ $6.00 1950 $7.75 1947 _ . $5.25 1951 —Z- $6.25 1948 _ . $9. 75. 1952-53 $9.00 D W IG H T D. EISENHOWER 1953 . _ $6. 75 1957 __ _ _ . $6. 75 1954 . _ $7.25 1958 $8. 25 1955 $6.75 1959 _ $7.00 1956 . $7.25 1960-61 _ $7. 75 , %.// JO H N F. KENNEDY 1961____ __ $9.00 1962 _ _ ______ ...... $9.00 1963 _ . _ $9. 00 LYNDON B. JO H N S O N 1963-64 (Book I ) . $6. 75 1965 (Book I ) ______ _ _ $6. 25 1963-64 (Book I I ) _ _ $7.00 1965 (Book II) ______ $6.
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 30 • NUMBER 131 Friday, July 9, 1965 • Washington, D.C
    FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 30 • NUMBER 131 Friday, July 9, 1965 • Washington, D.C. Pages 8659-8740 Agencies in this issue— The President Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Agriculture Department Atomic Energy Commission Civil Aeronautics Board Commodity Credit Corporation Comptroller of the Currency Consumer and Marketing Service Federal Aviation Agency Federal Communications Commission Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Federal Home Loan Bank Board Federal Maritime Commission Federal National Mortgage Association y Federal Power Commission Federal Reserve System Fish and Wildlife Service Food and Drug Administration Interior Department Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau National Park Service Securities and Exchange Commission Small Business Administration Tariff Commission Treasury Department Detailed list of Contents appears inside. 5-Year Compilations of Presidential Documents Supplements to Title 3 of the Gode of Federal Regulations The Supplements to Title 3 of the Code the President and published in the Federal of Federal Regulations contain the full text Register during the period June 2, 19 38 - of proclamations, Executive orders, reor­ December 31, 1963. Tabular finding aids ganization plans, trade! agreement letters, and subject indexes are included. The in­ and certain administrative orders issued by dividual volumes are priced as follows: 1938—1943 Compilation-—$3.00 1949—1953 Compilation— $7.00 1943—1948 Compilation— $7.00 1954—1958 Compilation— $4.00 1959—1963 Compilation—-$6.00 Compiled by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402 r r n r n 11 » “sW D C iilC JTITO Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or | p .lli.ilr ll IgMry1 H i , rn on the day after an official Federal,Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, Nat bw ...
    [Show full text]
  • TATION Volume 39, Number 9 Published by the S.C
    /_:.. \. t r=.. i7I 7l'r TATION Volume 39, Number 9 Published by the S.C. Aeronautics Commission September, 1987 MEDUCARE COMES TO LOWCOUNTRY Meducare. the Lowcountry's first dition would be jeopardized through am- The practice of hospital-based medical helicopter transport has begun bulance transport. helicopters began in 1976, and research service in the Charleston area. It will be "We work as a team with the local shows such programs save lives and able to transport patients from anywhere EMS, hospital and physician to provide money. A 1983 report in the Journal of within a 150 mile radius. With a cruising a complete network of emergency care the American Medical Association com- speed of 150 miles per hour, it can services," said Tom Curran, ad- pared the survival rate of 150 trauma pa- transport a patient to Charleston from 60 ministrative program director. tients flown to the hospital by helicopter miles away in approximately 30 minutes. "The bottom line is saving lives. and with that of 150 trauma patients who The purpose of Meducare is to assist in cases where minutes can make a dif- traveled by ambulance. The study show- Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and Ierence, a specially-equipped helicopter ed 52 percent fewer deaths among pa- to transport intensive care or critical pa- may be the best option." tients flown bv helicopter. tients to the Medical University. Accor- ding to Dr. David Reines, medical direc- tor of the service, the helicopter program is unique because it is a flying intensive care unit. Meducare will serve every hospital in the state that needs to transport patients by air to the Medical University.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Aeronautics Commission Annual Report
    rA~ ~20 1. 9q3 C_Dpy0 SOUTH CAROLINA AERONAUTICS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT . 1992-1993 y STATE Printed Under The Direction Of The oocur.;u.n s State Budget And Control Board LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To His Excellency, The Governor of South Carolina: It is my honor to present to you the report of the South Carolina Aeronautics Commission on its functions and activities for the year ending June 30, 1993. Respectfully submitted, Jimmie L. Hamilton, Chairman 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS S.C. Aeronautics Commission Staff.................................................................................. 4 Organizational Table ........................................................................................................ 5 WHAT DOES THE DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS DO? ........................................... 6 Summary of Division Activities ......................................................................................... 6 AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ...................................................................... 7 AlP Projects Federal Funding ........................................................................................... 7 State-Local Projects ......................................................................................................... 9 Airport Improvement Projects (Status) ........................................................................... lO Summary of Airport Development Expenditures ............................................................. 11 PLANNING FOR DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FAA Annual Runway Safety Report 2010
    Air Traffic Organization Annual Runway Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Safety Report 2010 Washington, DC 20591 Message from the Administrator Dear Colleague: When serious runway incursions drop by 50 percent over the previous year, you know you’re doing something right. The good news here is every corner of the aviation community is sharing the success. From the airlines to the business aviation community to the pilots, controllers, surface vehicle operators and the GA enthusiasts who just fly for pleasure, everyone has taken a step up. The numbers alone tell the story. With almost 53 million operations in FY 2009, we had 12 serious runway incursions, down from 25 the previous year; two serious incursions involved commercial aircraft. Those are encouraging numbers. When we issued a Call to Action for runway safety almost two years ago, we as a community recognized the need to do a better job of keeping things safe on the airport surface. Even though the number of mistakes is infinitesimally small, given the number of successful operations per day, we nevertheless need to take every opportunity to continue to enhance surface safety. As you’ll clearly see in the runway safety report, that’s what is happening. The emergence of a “just culture” between regulator and regulated has played a huge part. Because we have so few data points, we need for the people in the system to be able to say, “Here’s a problem” without fear of penalty. As a result, we’re learning about the soft spots, the places, and procedures that need to change.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Transit Development Plan Update May 2021
    2021 Transit Development Plan Update May 2021 Presented to Greenville Transit Authority Prepared by Connetics Transportation Group Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Fixed Route Service Expansion Update ...................................................................................................................... 6 Capital Cost Update ................................................................................................................................................... 16 Countywide Demand Response Plan ....................................................................................................................... 22 List of Figures Figure 1. Projected Annual Greenlink Operating Budget by Time Period (FY20$, in M) ......................................... 3 Figure 2. Projected Annual Greenlink Capital Budget (FY20$, in M) ........................................................................ 3 Figure 3. Proposed Radial Routes .............................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 4. Proposed Connector Routes........................................................................................................................ 9 Figure 5. Proposed Crosstown Routes ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GV Trust.Pages
    Affordable Housing Strategy Working Group Considerations Towards a Housing Trust Fund September 2017 Housing Challenge Across Greenville County The City of Greenville today bears little resemblance to the city it was in the early 1970s. During the last 40 years, downtown has become an economic engine in its own right, repositioning the new Greenville as one of the great small cities in America and placing it in the rarified company of Santa Cruz (CA), Duluth (MN), Asheville (NC), and Bend (OR). This, for good reason, as it has successfully transitioned from textiles and agriculture to high tech/manufacturing, medicine, engineering, technology, and education, and invested in its workforce, the natural environment, and amenities. Moreover, it has done so in ways where demand to live in the city has grown and, with that growth, prices - and confidence in the future - have risen as well. The success in transforming Greenville into a genuine treasure has meant evermore city capacity to do evermore investing. Because more (smart) investing (in parks, infrastructure, workforce development, beautification) has meant more demand, and more demand has resulted in a larger tax base, Greenville increasingly has more self-reinvestment capacity. This is exactly the flywheel effect a city wants, one that 75% of America’s cities do not and will not ever have, and one that - provided good decisions continue to be made by the city and the county - is going to result in long term vibrancy for Greenville. In no way, however, is this feedback loop an unalloyed good. Vibrancy is an amalgam of several compounds. One among the good is that vibrancy means property values grow, a gain that benefits most homeowners in the form of rising home equity and the capacity to transform that equity into household wealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 84/Wednesday, May 1, 2002/Rules
    Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 84 / Wednesday, May 1, 2002 / Rules and Regulations 21575 Conditional Requirements for Immediate Inspector, who may add comments and then DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Inspection send it to the Manager, Atlanta ACO. (g) Notwithstanding the requirements of Note 4: Information concerning the Federal Aviation Administration paragraph (f) of this AD: Before further flight existence of approved alternative methods of following removal of any parts identified in compliance with this AD, if any, may be 14 CFR Part 71 paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD, obtained from the Atlanta ACO. perform the inspection specified in [Airspace Docket No. 02–ASO–4] paragraph (f) of this AD. The task numbers Special Flight Permits below are identified in EMBRAER Aircraft Establishment of Class D Airspace; Maintenance Manuals AMM–145/1124 and (k) Special flight permits may be issued per Greenville Donaldson Center, SC, AMM–145/1230. sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Amendment of Class E2 Airspace; (1) The horizontal stabilizer (as specified in Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and Greer, Greenville-Spartanburg Airport, EMBRAER Airplane Maintenance Manual 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location SC, and Amendment of Class E5 (AMM) task number 55–10–00–000–801–A). where the requirements of this AD can be Airspace; Greenville, SC (2) The horizontal stabilizer actuator (as accomplished. specified in AMM task number 27–40–02– AGENCY: Federal Aviation 000–801–A). Incorporation by Reference Administration (FAA), DOT. (3) The left-hand or right-hand seal fairings (l) Except as required by paragraphs (g) and ACTION: Final rule.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Department of Commerce Division of Aeronautics Airport Directory
    South Carolina Department of Commerce Division of Aeronautics Airport Directory List of Airport Contacts Date Printed: 712412001 S. C. STATE LIBRARY SEP 2 4 2002 :TATE DOCUMENTS Airport Contacts For Aiken Municipal Airport Mr. Bob Woods Mr. Don Barnes 234 Airpark Blvd. 802 Legare Road Aiken , SC 29801 Aiken , SC 29803 FBO Commissioner Affiliation: Aiken Aviation Enterprises, Inc. Affiliation: Aiken Municipal Airport Commission Email: Email : [email protected] Phone: (803) 641-9999 Phone: (803) 648-2083 All: Alt: FAX: (803) 648-7804 FAX: Key Contact: No Key Contact: No Mr. James Findley Mr. Robert Haythorn 232 Willow Lake Drive 106 Bald Cypress Court Aiken , SC 29802 Aiken, SC 29628 Commissioner Chairman Affiliation: Aiken Municipal Airport Commission Affiliation: Aiken Municipal Airport Commission Email : Email: [email protected] Phone: (803) 648-8101 Phone: (803) 642-1740 All: Alt: (803) 642-7646 FAX: FAX: Key Contact: No Key Contact: No Mr. Barry Johnson Dr. Gerald Oliver 4020 Trolley Line Road 1055A Silver Bluff Road Aiken, SC 29801 Aiken, SC Commissioner Commissioner Affiliation: Aiken Municipal Airport Commission Affiliation: Aiken Municipal Airport Commission Email: Email: Phone: (803) 642-2914 Phone: (803) 648-3500 Alt: Alt: FAX: FAX: Key Contact: No Key Contact: No Mr. Joseph Williams Mr. Bear Woodrum 128 White Willow Place 119 Ashwood Drive Aiken , SC 29802 Aiken, SC Commissioner Commissioner Affiliation : Aiken Municipal Airport Commission Affiliation: Aiken Municipal Airport Commission Email: [email protected] Email: Phone: (803) 648-8101 Phone : (803) 648-5481 All: All: FAX: FAX: Key Contact: No Key Contact: No 24-Ju/-01 Airport Contacts For Aiken Municipal Airport Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices to the California Airports Forecasting Study
    Caltrans Airport Forecasting Study The Role of California Airports in Smart Growth and Economic Vitality appendices prepared for California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Mead & Hunt Economic Development Research Group January 31, 2014 www.camsys.com appendices Caltrans Airport Forecasting Study The Role of California Airports in Smart Growth and Economic Vitality prepared for California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 555 12th Street, Suite 1600 Oakland, CA 94607 with Mead & Hunt Economic Development Research Group date January 31, 2014 Caltrans Airport Forecasting Study Table of Contents A. Summary of Data for California Airports and Surrounding Areas ......... A-1 A.1 Historical Data Related to Economic Analysis ...................................... A-1 A.2 Forecasted Data Related to Economic Analysis .................................... A-3 A.3 Initial Population and Employment Profiles ......................................... A-5 A.4 Representative Airport Traffic Profiles................................................... A-9 B. Characteristics of Smart Growth Potential at Airports ............................... B-1 B.1 Characteristics Making Places More Likely to Attract Smart Growth ........................................................................................................ B-1 B.2 How Airport Land Supports Smart Growth Attractive Characteristics ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ROD) and Public Comment Letters and Responses to Comments and Environmental Assessment Errata
    Federal Aviation Administration Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and Record of Decision (ROD) and Public Comment Letters and Responses to Comments and Environmental Assessment Errata For the Charlotte Optimization of the Airspace and Procedures in the Metroplex (CLT OAPM) June 2015 Table of Contents Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and Record of Decision (ROD) I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 II. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... 2 III. PROPOSED ACTION .............................................................................................. 3 IV. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION ....................................... 3 V. ALTERNATIVES ...................................................................................................... 4 VI. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................. 6 VII. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES .................................................................. 6 Noise .............................................................................................................................. 7 Compatible Land Use ..................................................................................................... 8 Department of Transportation Act, Section 4(f)............................................................... 8 Historical and Cultural Resources
    [Show full text]