2021 Transit Development Plan Update May 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2021 Transit Development Plan Update May 2021 2021 Transit Development Plan Update May 2021 Presented to Greenville Transit Authority Prepared by Connetics Transportation Group Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Fixed Route Service Expansion Update ...................................................................................................................... 6 Capital Cost Update ................................................................................................................................................... 16 Countywide Demand Response Plan ....................................................................................................................... 22 List of Figures Figure 1. Projected Annual Greenlink Operating Budget by Time Period (FY20$, in M) ......................................... 3 Figure 2. Projected Annual Greenlink Capital Budget (FY20$, in M) ........................................................................ 3 Figure 3. Proposed Radial Routes .............................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 4. Proposed Connector Routes........................................................................................................................ 9 Figure 5. Proposed Crosstown Routes ..................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 6. Proposed Circulator Routes ....................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 7. Job Coverage for Expanded Fixed Route Network ................................................................................... 15 Figure 8. Stop Location Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 9. Peer Operators of Countywide Demand Response .................................................................................. 22 Figure 10. Zone Concept Overview ........................................................................................................................... 25 Figure 11. Zone Concept Anchor Points ................................................................................................................... 26 List of Tables Table 1. Projected Operations Cost by Project ........................................................................................................... 4 Table 2. Projected Capital Cost by Project ................................................................................................................. 5 Table 3. Fixed Route Expansion Changes .................................................................................................................. 6 Table 4. Fixed Route Expansion Service Summary ................................................................................................... 7 Table 5. Projected Operating Cost for Fixed Route Expansion................................................................................ 12 Table 6. GAP Productivities by Route Added ............................................................................................................ 13 Table 7. Bus Stop Infrastructure Needs by Route ................................................................................................... 19 Table 8. Vehicle Procurement Plan .......................................................................................................................... 21 Table 9. Peer Operator Population Density .............................................................................................................. 23 Table 10. Demand Response Peer Analysis ............................................................................................................ 23 Table 11. Zone Concept Ridership and Operating Statistics .................................................................................. 27 Table 12. Zone Concept Annual Cost Estimates ..................................................................................................... 27 Executive Summary The dawn of the 2020s is an exciting time for the Greenville metropolitan area. The region continues to expand, with robust population and employment growth. Between 2010 and 2019 the county population grew by 16%, adding to 72,000 residents. Residential, commercial, and office development is abundant, and Greenville has densified as more residents move to the county. This growth is putting pressure on the region to provide more urban amenities and services, including Greenlink transit service. A Necessary Update As development changes where people live and work in Greenville County, and how they commute between the two, it is necessary to review previous assumptions and ensure future plans match the evolving landscape. This document is an update to the 2020-24 Transit Development Plan, which was adopted by the Greenville Transit Authority Board of Directors in April 2018. Since the previous plan was completed only three years ago, it is generally agreed that the previous analysis, findings, and decisions are still appropriate. Thus, this document focuses on the changes to travel markets and developments that have occurred in the intervening three years, and updates transit service recommendations to best serve Greenville residents. The TDP Update focuses on three specific analyses: • A review and update to the fixed route service expansion plan; • An analysis of future capital costs, including new maintenance facility, additional bus stop locations, and accompanying vehicle plan for the proposed service expansion plan; and • A plan for countywide demand response service to provide transit service to residents of the outer parts of Greenville County who do not have access to fixed route bus service. The Next Ten Years A significant expansion of Greenlink services is planned over the next ten years to meet the transportation needs of Greenville County residents. Projected Operating Budget Needs The Greenlink annual operating budget for 2021 is projected at $7.03 million (FY20$), including both fixed route and GAP paratransit service, but not including the downtown trolley. If all proposed operating plans are realized, Greenlink would need an additional $16.07 million in annual funds (FY20$) to operate the expanded system. The full expansion plan includes: • $8.54 million in cost to increase service to the core Greenlink network, including: o Increases in Weekday 30-minute peak frequency on core routes o Increases in Saturday 30-minute frequency on core routes o New Sunday service • $6.79 million in cost for route expansion, including: o 15 new routes o Adjustments to two existing Greenlink routes (504 and 506) • $0.74 million in additional GAP service, including: Greenlink 2021 Transit Development Plan Update Page 1 o Additional Saturday and Sunday service to match service expansion in the core network o Additional geographic coverage to match fixed route expansion Figure 1 provides the growth in annual operating cost by time period, while Table 1 provides a more detailed look at operating cost of individual projects. Projected Capital Budget Needs A robust capital plan accompanies Greenlink’s proposed service expansion, including new stop infrastructure, new bus vehicles, and a new maintenance facility. If all proposed capital plans are realized, Greenlink would need between $55.68 million and $95.33 million (FY20$) in capital dollars to realize the expanded system. However, the implementation timeline for these projects stretches past 2029, so the year over year impact of this proposed capital budget is uncertain. The capital expansion plan includes: • $28.62 million (FY20$) to construct a new maintenance facility • $7.13 million (FY20$) in bus stop improvements for expansion routes • A range of $19.95 million to $59.60 million (FY20$) in bus vehicle capital costs, depending on the type of propulsion selected Figure 2 provides the capital cost by time period, while Table 2 provides a more detailed look at capital cost of individual projects. Countywide Demand Response Concept This TDP Update also explores the feasibility of operating demand response in the outer parts of Greenville County beyond where fixed route and GAP service would operate. The analysis shows a need between $5.36 million and $7.44 million (FY20$), annually, to operate countywide demand response outside of the expanded fixed route network. The range of cost depends on whether the concept is directly operated or purchased transportation. A capital cost of $1.76 million (FY20$) would also be needed to purchase 22 Ford Transit vehicles for the countywide demand response concept. Greenlink 2021 Transit Development Plan Update Page 2 Figure 1. Projected Annual Greenlink Operating Budget by Time Period (FY20$, in M) Projected Annual Operating Budget (FY20$, in M) $25.0 $20.0 $15.0 $10.0 $5.0 Annual Operating Budget (in M) (in Budget Operating Annual $- Existing 2021-24 2025-29 After 2029 Fixed Route GAP Figure 2. Projected Annual Greenlink Capital Budget (FY20$, in M) Capital Cost Estimate (FY20$, in M) $50.0 $45.0 $40.0 $35.0 $30.0 $25.0 $20.0 Total Capital Cost Capital Total $15.0 $10.0 $5.0 $- 2021-24 2025-29 After 2029 Infrastructure Costs Vehicle Costs (CNG) Additional Cost for Electric
Recommended publications
  • South Carolina School Guide
    2016-17 SOUTH CAROLINA SCHOOL GUIDE School Index County Index Public Schools Private Schools Catholic Schools State Agency Schools Regional Agency Schools Selected Educational Organizations Department of Education YOU ARE YOUR MOST POWERFUL ADVOCATE. MORE THAN EVER, COLORECTAL CANCER IS A PERSONAL MATTER. Today, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States,* but that may be changing. Research shows that knowing the genetic and molecular makeup of your colorectal tumor may lead to safer, more effective treatment, just for you. Make it personal. It’s your tumor. Talk to your doctor about testing your tumor. Speak up. Ask questions. Go to SU2C.org/colorectalcancer to learn more. Greg Kinnear, SU2C Ambassador Stand Up To Cancer is a program of the Entertainment Industry Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization. *According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States when men and women are combined. 2016-17 SOUTH CAROLINA SCHOOL GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS School Index ......................................................................2 State Agency Schools ................................................. 98 County Index .................................................................. 12 Regional Agency Schools ......................................... 99 Public Schools ................................................................ 13 Selected Educational Organizations ...................101
    [Show full text]
  • Carolina High School & Academy Portfolio
    Carolina High School & Academy Portfolio School Portfolio 2015 - 2016 Michael Delaney, Principal Burke Royster, Superintendent Scope of Plan: 2013 – 2014 through 2017 – 2018 Greenville County Schools SCHOOL RENEWAL PLAN COVER PAGE (Mandated Component) REQUIRED - SCHOOL INFORMATION AND SIGNATURES SCHOOL: Carolina High School DISTRICT: Greenville County Schools SCHOOL RENEWAL PLAN FOR YEARS: 2013-14 through 2017-18 (five years) SCHOOL RENEWAL ANNUAL UPDATE FOR: 2015-16 (one year) Assurances The school renewal plan, or annual update of the school renewal plan, includes elements required by the Early Childhood Development and Academic Assistance Act of 1993 (Act 135) and the Education Accountability Act of 1998 (EAA) (S.C. Code Ann. §§ 59-18-1300 and 59-139-10 et seq. (Supp. 2004)). The signatures of the chairperson of the board of trustees, the superintendent, the principal, and the chairperson of the school improvement council are affirmation of active participation of key stakeholders and alignment with Act 135 and EAA requirements. CHAIRPERSON, BOARD OF TRUSTEES Mrs. Lisa Wells PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE DATE SUPERINTENDENT Mr. W. Burke Royster PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE DATE CHAIRPERSON, SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL Jamie Roberson PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE DATE PRINCIPAL Michael Delaney PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE DATE SCHOOL ADDRESS: 2725 Anderson Road, Greenville, SC, 29611 SCHOOL’S TELEPHONE: (864) 355-2300 PRINCIPAL’S E-MAIL ADDRESS: [email protected] STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT FOR SCHOOL PLAN (Mandated Component) List the name of persons who were involved in the development of the school renewal plan. A participant for each numbered category is required. POSITION NAME 1. PRINCIPAL Michael Delaney 2. TEACHER Cheryl Todd-Stout 3.
    [Show full text]
  • SC EV Market Study
    SC EV Market Study 1 South Carolina Electric Vehicle Market Study Introduction 4 Current Assessment 5 Trends and Future Outlook 12 Implementation 17 Infrastructure Development 17 Educational Campaign: Plug in SC 22 1 Background Palmetto Clean Fuels (PCF) is an initiative of the South Carolina Office of Regulatory Staff - Energy Office (Energy Office). PCF is one of more than 100 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Clean Cities designees and represents the entire state of South Carolina. Clean Cities is a locally based, voluntary public/private partnership created to promote energy use in the transportation sector that is clean, safe, sustainable, and less dependent upon foreign energy sources. Clean Cities builds on local initiatives and partnerships as well as nationwide networks to achieve its goals. By combining local decision- making with voluntary action by partners, this grassroots community action group seeks to create effective programs that support a sustainable nationwide alternative fuels market. PCF works to increase the use of alternative fuels and advanced vehicle technologies and strives to help public and private entities— as well as individuals— lower fuel costs, improve air quality, and reduce petroleum consumption. PCF also promotes idle reduction, fuel economy measures, vehicle miles traveled reductions, and bicycle and pedestrian efforts. 1 2 Introduction This study focuses on one aspect of PCF work—electric vehicles (EV). It builds on several regional studies as well as the past efforts of the organization, Plug-In Carolina. Plug-In Carolina, a registered non-profit, was selected to manage a program to install Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) funded with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) through the Energy Office.
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 32 • NUM BER 189 Friday, September 29, 1967 • Washington, D.C
    FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 32 • NUM BER 189 Friday, September 29, 1967 • Washington, D.C. Pages 13629-13688 Agencies in this issue— The President Agricultural Research Service Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Army Department Atomic Energy Commission Business and Defense Services Administration Civil Aeronautics Board Civil Sërvice Commission Coast Guard Commerce Department Consumer and Marketing Service Federal Aviation Administration Federal Communications Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Trade Commission Forest Service General Services Administration International Commerce Bureau Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau National Park Service Post Office Department Public Health Service Securities and Exchange Commission Social Security Administration Tariff Commission Treasury Department Detailed list of Contents appears inside. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States Annual volumes containing the public messages and statements, news conferences, and other selected papers released by the White House. Volumes for the following years are now available: HARRY S. TRUMAN 1945 ___ $5. 50 1949 . _ $6.75 1946 __ $6.00 1950 $7.75 1947 _ . $5.25 1951 —Z- $6.25 1948 _ . $9. 75. 1952-53 $9.00 D W IG H T D. EISENHOWER 1953 . _ $6. 75 1957 __ _ _ . $6. 75 1954 . _ $7.25 1958 $8. 25 1955 $6.75 1959 _ $7.00 1956 . $7.25 1960-61 _ $7. 75 , %.// JO H N F. KENNEDY 1961____ __ $9.00 1962 _ _ ______ ...... $9.00 1963 _ . _ $9. 00 LYNDON B. JO H N S O N 1963-64 (Book I ) . $6. 75 1965 (Book I ) ______ _ _ $6. 25 1963-64 (Book I I ) _ _ $7.00 1965 (Book II) ______ $6.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Educational Opportunity Programs Week 4 GREENVILLE, SPARTANBURG, CHEROKEE, & UNION Monday, September 17 – Friday, September 21
    South Carolina Educational Opportunity Programs Week 4 GREENVILLE, SPARTANBURG, CHEROKEE, & UNION Monday, September 17 – Friday, September 21 1 Carolinas Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers (Code of Ethics) The purpose of an Ed-Op Program is to provide a chance for high school students, particularly juniors and seniors, to be exposed to many different educational opportunities and to explore specific interests. 1. It is the responsibility of each college or university to inform any person (who represents that institution) of the CACRAO Code of Ethics which will be in effect at all CACRAO sponsored Educational Opportunity Programs. Each institutional representative must respect the rights of other institutions. ● One official representative is considered adequate at an Educational Opportunity Program. If more than one representative is needed, those present must confine all activities to the assigned space. ● Group presentations are not condoned in arena settings where a number of institutions share common quarters. Such presentations discourage students from exploring all of their options. ● The use of overly conspicuous exhibits as promotional devices are prohibited, i.e. (videos, large pictorial displays, balloons…) ● Distributed educational information must be limited to printed materials which are accurate and tasteful. Handouts such as key chains, balloons, pens, pennants, and foods are not acceptable. ● Applications for admissions may be distributed, but not completed at Educational Opportunity Programs. ● CACRAO members should display the highest levels of decorum and avoid any unprofessional behavior that would disgrace the CACRAO organization or that would infringe upon the rights of their fellow members. 2. School counselors are encouraged to limit program invitations to CACRAO members and other degree-granting institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mindful Builder
    Office of Marketing and Public Relations 3300 Poinsett Highway Greenville, South Carolina 29613 FOR ALUMNI AND FRIENDS OF THE UNIVERSITY ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED Furman COMMEMORATE This year marks the 50th FALL 2014 anniversary of desegregation at Furman. A wide range of events is planned, RESILIENCY SHELF LIFE PERSPECTIVE THE including those to honor the first African Is our next Books that THE MINDFUL BUILDER David Shi '73 COMEBACK American student to attend and graduate generation inspire physics on the modern Your next visit to from the university: Joseph Allen Vaughn tough enough? professor Susan Elizabeth Davis begins affliction of Furman starts pg. 32 D’Amato '77 as Furman’s 12th president loneliness here '68 (pictured here). You can read about pg. 44 pg. 46 pg. 38 the yearlong commemoration on page 12 CREDIT ART pg. 24 of this issue. You can also visit the website: furman.edu/50years. Credit by Teekaykay FURMAN | FALL 2014 1 furman_book_v42.indd 76 9/24/14 9:51 AM furman_book_v42.indd 1 9/23/14 3:33 PM Jessica Netzloff Furman’s class of 2018 boasts more than high test scores and stellar GPAs Furman is where it began for you. (average of 1281 and 4.5, in case you were wondering). They’re creative, athletic, * driven, and destined to make their mark around the Furman Lake and beyond. Keep it that way for them. 1 International Gold Medalist cyclist 43 Artists One of the most convenient and effective ways to sustain the Furman 244 Captains of an athletic team 1 Drum Corps International World Champion experience for generations to come is by setting up a recurring monthly 182 Two-sport varsity athletes 119 Community service leaders gift of any amount.
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 30 • NUMBER 131 Friday, July 9, 1965 • Washington, D.C
    FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 30 • NUMBER 131 Friday, July 9, 1965 • Washington, D.C. Pages 8659-8740 Agencies in this issue— The President Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Agriculture Department Atomic Energy Commission Civil Aeronautics Board Commodity Credit Corporation Comptroller of the Currency Consumer and Marketing Service Federal Aviation Agency Federal Communications Commission Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Federal Home Loan Bank Board Federal Maritime Commission Federal National Mortgage Association y Federal Power Commission Federal Reserve System Fish and Wildlife Service Food and Drug Administration Interior Department Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau National Park Service Securities and Exchange Commission Small Business Administration Tariff Commission Treasury Department Detailed list of Contents appears inside. 5-Year Compilations of Presidential Documents Supplements to Title 3 of the Gode of Federal Regulations The Supplements to Title 3 of the Code the President and published in the Federal of Federal Regulations contain the full text Register during the period June 2, 19 38 - of proclamations, Executive orders, reor­ December 31, 1963. Tabular finding aids ganization plans, trade! agreement letters, and subject indexes are included. The in­ and certain administrative orders issued by dividual volumes are priced as follows: 1938—1943 Compilation-—$3.00 1949—1953 Compilation— $7.00 1943—1948 Compilation— $7.00 1954—1958 Compilation— $4.00 1959—1963 Compilation—-$6.00 Compiled by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402 r r n r n 11 » “sW D C iilC JTITO Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or | p .lli.ilr ll IgMry1 H i , rn on the day after an official Federal,Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, Nat bw ...
    [Show full text]
  • TATION Volume 39, Number 9 Published by the S.C
    /_:.. \. t r=.. i7I 7l'r TATION Volume 39, Number 9 Published by the S.C. Aeronautics Commission September, 1987 MEDUCARE COMES TO LOWCOUNTRY Meducare. the Lowcountry's first dition would be jeopardized through am- The practice of hospital-based medical helicopter transport has begun bulance transport. helicopters began in 1976, and research service in the Charleston area. It will be "We work as a team with the local shows such programs save lives and able to transport patients from anywhere EMS, hospital and physician to provide money. A 1983 report in the Journal of within a 150 mile radius. With a cruising a complete network of emergency care the American Medical Association com- speed of 150 miles per hour, it can services," said Tom Curran, ad- pared the survival rate of 150 trauma pa- transport a patient to Charleston from 60 ministrative program director. tients flown to the hospital by helicopter miles away in approximately 30 minutes. "The bottom line is saving lives. and with that of 150 trauma patients who The purpose of Meducare is to assist in cases where minutes can make a dif- traveled by ambulance. The study show- Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and Ierence, a specially-equipped helicopter ed 52 percent fewer deaths among pa- to transport intensive care or critical pa- may be the best option." tients flown bv helicopter. tients to the Medical University. Accor- ding to Dr. David Reines, medical direc- tor of the service, the helicopter program is unique because it is a flying intensive care unit. Meducare will serve every hospital in the state that needs to transport patients by air to the Medical University.
    [Show full text]
  • GREENVILLE, SC (8:30 A
    For release - 8:45 a.m. Wednesday, August 16, 2017 Plain Elementary’s Suzanne Billings Named GCS Teacher of the Year GREENVILLE, SC – Greenville County Schools Superintendent Dr. Burke Royster announced the selection of Suzanne Billings, a fourth grade teacher at Plain Elementary School, the 2017-18 Greenville County Teacher of the Year. Also announced were first runner-up Anjosia Ellerbe, business education teacher at Wade Hampton High; second runner-up Erin Rigot, a communications teacher at League Middle Academy, and third runner-up Ashley Jenkins, a tenth grade world history teacher at Woodmont High School. Finalists are Scott Buhr, Physics and Earth Science, Hillcrest High School; Jeremy Bowen, Mathematics, J. L. Mann High Academy; David Dejesa, Social Studies/Speech & Debate, Riverside High School; Chancey Greco, Sixth Grade English Language Arts, Greenville Middle Academy; Lauren Long, Eighth Grade English, Hillcrest Middle School; and Thomas McAuliff, Third Grade, Taylors Elementary School. Suzanne Billings, Fourth Grade, Plain Elementary 2017-18 Greenville County Schools Teacher of the Year Plain Elementary fourth grade teacher Suzanne Billings recognizes how her father’s coaching led her to become a teacher. “Having my dad as my basketball and softball coach allowed me to see how he implemented mentoring skills in sports. He focused on not just improving physical skills, but developing both character and self-confidence,” she said. Later, she realized the breadth of his influence when she discovered that one of her teammates wrote her college essay about Billings’ father. “She said my dad made the most significant impact on her personal development,” said Billings. “I knew I wanted to be like my dad and inspire others to achieve their best and positively impact their personal growth and success.” Today, this 19-year educator roots her teaching practices in creating a positive, inclusive classroom community.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Aeronautics Commission Annual Report
    rA~ ~20 1. 9q3 C_Dpy0 SOUTH CAROLINA AERONAUTICS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT . 1992-1993 y STATE Printed Under The Direction Of The oocur.;u.n s State Budget And Control Board LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To His Excellency, The Governor of South Carolina: It is my honor to present to you the report of the South Carolina Aeronautics Commission on its functions and activities for the year ending June 30, 1993. Respectfully submitted, Jimmie L. Hamilton, Chairman 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS S.C. Aeronautics Commission Staff.................................................................................. 4 Organizational Table ........................................................................................................ 5 WHAT DOES THE DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS DO? ........................................... 6 Summary of Division Activities ......................................................................................... 6 AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ...................................................................... 7 AlP Projects Federal Funding ........................................................................................... 7 State-Local Projects ......................................................................................................... 9 Airport Improvement Projects (Status) ........................................................................... lO Summary of Airport Development Expenditures ............................................................. 11 PLANNING FOR DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FAA Annual Runway Safety Report 2010
    Air Traffic Organization Annual Runway Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Safety Report 2010 Washington, DC 20591 Message from the Administrator Dear Colleague: When serious runway incursions drop by 50 percent over the previous year, you know you’re doing something right. The good news here is every corner of the aviation community is sharing the success. From the airlines to the business aviation community to the pilots, controllers, surface vehicle operators and the GA enthusiasts who just fly for pleasure, everyone has taken a step up. The numbers alone tell the story. With almost 53 million operations in FY 2009, we had 12 serious runway incursions, down from 25 the previous year; two serious incursions involved commercial aircraft. Those are encouraging numbers. When we issued a Call to Action for runway safety almost two years ago, we as a community recognized the need to do a better job of keeping things safe on the airport surface. Even though the number of mistakes is infinitesimally small, given the number of successful operations per day, we nevertheless need to take every opportunity to continue to enhance surface safety. As you’ll clearly see in the runway safety report, that’s what is happening. The emergence of a “just culture” between regulator and regulated has played a huge part. Because we have so few data points, we need for the people in the system to be able to say, “Here’s a problem” without fear of penalty. As a result, we’re learning about the soft spots, the places, and procedures that need to change.
    [Show full text]
  • School District
    SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL NAME ABBEVILLE CO SCHOOL DISTRICT ABBEVILLE CO CAREER CENTER ABBEVILLE HIGH SCHOOL CHEROKEE TRAIL ELEM SCHOOL DIAMOND HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DIXIE HIGH SCHOOL JOHN C CALHOUN ELEM SCHOOL LONG CANE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WESTWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL WRIGHT MIDDLE SCHOOL AIKEN CO SCHOOL DISTRICT AIKEN PERFORMING ARTS ACADEMY LLOYD-KENNEDY CHARTER SCH MIDLAND VALLEY PREP SCH PINECREST CENTER AIKEN SCHOOL DISTRICT-AREA 1 AIKEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AIKEN HIGH SCHOOL AIKEN MIDDLE SCHOOL CHUKKER CREEK ELEM SCHOOL EAST AIKEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL J D LEVER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MILLBROOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MINNIE B KENNEDY MIDDLE SCHOOL NORTH AIKEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OAKWOOD-WINDSOR ELEM SCHOOL SCHOFIELD MIDDLE SCHOOL SOUTH AIKEN HIGH SCHOOL AIKEN SCHOOL DISTRICT-AREA 2 BELVEDERE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HAMMOND HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MOSSY CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NORTH AUGUSTA ELEM SCHOOL NORTH AUGUSTA HIGH SCHOOL NORTH AUGUSTA MIDDLE SCHOOL PAUL KNOX MIDDLE SCHOOL AIKEN SCHOOL DISTRICT-AREA 3 AIKEN CO CAREER & TECH CENTER BYRD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLEARWATER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GLOVERVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LANGLEY-BATH-CLEARWATER MS LEAVELLE MCCAMPBELL MIDDLE SCH 1 MIDLAND VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL WARRENVILLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AIKEN SCHOOL DISTRICT-AREA 4 A L CORBETT MIDDLE SCHOOL CYRIL B BUSBEE ELEM SCHOOL RIDGE SPRING-MONETTA ELEM SCH RIDGE SPRING-MONETTA HIGH SCH WAGENER-SALLEY HIGH SCHOOL AIKEN SCHOOL DISTRICT-AREA 5 GREENDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JACKSON MIDDLE SCHOOL NEW ELLENTON MIDDLE SCHOOL REDCLIFFE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SILVER
    [Show full text]