Masaoka Shiki
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PllliSMif -TlV ' m; r; ... ||pillp»si 5 W-m Eft •t n !E?C3ft fit; I ^ifc;bIB m HItMsm.. III K=s : mm ■ ■ i :.i-! ■Si* ■ iv'; V iartit inaatttu&u*t =‘! its“ '■:3. " L’iV:i: MV - si i i ! •o- mH tesiM mf 3 ttmpse • 3 •- 1 i®£ . ■ ...M j:- 'V/-"?-vr::i 33 3 1' IgjSpllSI 1 iufiisiiliffiilSiiS lfil^i|l*il®fflr ' : pip" a 5 i'.it’rr.frH iV***-?: • r* ; : fv fb fccy a~33 fauJ#bo t ^-3 $0'? 3 Masaoka Shiki Twayne’s World Authors Series Ray E. Teele, Editor University of Texas, Austin * MASAOKA SHIKI (1867-1902) Masaoka Shiki By Janine Beichman University of Library• and Information Science Twayne Publishers • Boston Masaoka Shiki | Janine Beichman Copyright ©1982 by G. K. Hall & Co. All Rights Reserved Published by Twaync Publishers A Division of G. K. Hall & Company 70 Lincoln Street Boston, Massachusetts 02111 Printed on permanent / durable acid-free paper and bound in The United States of America. Book production by Mame B. Sultz Book design by Barbara Anderson library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data : Beichman, Janine. Masaoka Shiki. (Twayne's world authors series; TWAS 661) Bibliography: p. 156 Includes index. 1. Masaoka, Shiki, 1867-1902—Criticism 1 and interpretation. I. Tide. H. Series. PL811.A83Z57 895.6'14 82-3116 ISBN 0-8057-6504-2 AACR2 For Aya ' I ■r i Contents About the Author Preface Acknowledgments Chronology Chapter One Life: From Samurai to Poet 1 Chapter Two Haiku: From Infinite Ambition to the Zero Wish 31 Chapter Three Tanka: The Consecration of the Everyday 74 Chapter Pour Prose: "The Little Garden Is My Universe” 104 Chapter Five Diaries: "I Feel the Pain and See the Beauty” 116 Notes and References 143 Selected Bibliography 136 Index 166 About the Author Janine Beichman is visiting professor of literature at the University of Library and Information Science in Tsukuba Academic City, Japan, and lecturer in Japanese literature at Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan. She was born and educated in the United States, and received her doctorate in East Asian Studies from Columbia University in 1973; she has lived in Japan since 1969". She studied No chanting for three years, has written a No play which will be produced in Japan in 1982, and has published tanka as well as critical articles in Japanese. Her publications in English include translations, articles, and reviews in such journals as Monumenta Nipponica, Japan Quarterly, The Japan Interpreter, Transactions of the International Conference of Orientalists in Japan, and Proceedings of the National Institute of Japanese Literature. Preface Japanese critics like to refer to Masaoka Shiki as "the father of the modern haiku.” By this they mean two things: first, that Shiki was the earliest to write haiku that were modern in both theme and subject; and second, that all the major currents of contemporary haiku have their beginnings in him. Both views are true, but too much emphasis on them tends to obscure other facets of Shiki that may be of even more interest to non-Japanese readers. The popular image of Shiki is as a haiku poet, but in fact his allegiance from the beginning of his career was never to the haiku alone but to literature as a whole, that new cultural category spawned by the Meiji period. He wrote much tanka criticism and poetry and gave birth to a new school of tanka poetry. In the last few years of his life, Shiki also wrote a series of diaries and essays which became central in the development of the language and diction of modern Japanese prose. Shiki was one of the first modern Japanese authors to write seriously in several different genres with no sense of contradiction. Many of his contemporaries also did so: Tsubouchi Shoyo wrote plays, novels, and literary criticism; Shiki’s friend Yosano Tekkan wrote tanka, free verse, and poetic criticism, and also translated poetry; both Kunikida Doppo and Shimazaki Toson began as poets but moved on to fiction; Natsume Soseki and Mori Ogai, also friends of Shiki, both wrote extensively in several different genres of prose and verse. Shiki, while part of this trend, was also one of its creators, one of the first litterateurs (bungakusha) of modern Japan. Born just one year before the Meiji Restoration, Shiki was in many ways a transitional figure, his writings standing midway between the premodern and the modern periods, his character and life partaking of both. Had he lived longer, perhaps the paradoxes of his thought would have been resolved as the tensions engendered by the interaction of foreign and indigenous cultures worked themselves out. Or perhaps MASAOKA SHIKI they would not have, for Shiki seems to have enjoyed paradox, ambiguity, and irony. At any rate, he was quite unperturbed even when aware of the logical inconsistencies in which they sometimes involved him. His decision to devote his life to the haiku and the tanka, although he believed that both forms would be extinct by the end of the Meiji period, is a case in point. He was aware of the contradiction between his actions and his belief, but in a letter to his friend and disciple Kawahigashi Hekigoto in 1892, he remarked that as an artist he ignored such theories and thought that Hekigoto should, too. In the same way, he sought a justification for Japan’s traditional poetic forms (the haiku and the tanka) in Western ideas (Herbert Spencer’s), but did not feel free to pursue literature as a vocation until he could make it conform to the rationalism and scholarly approach of the Confucian tradition. In other words, he felt a need to justify traditional poetry in modern terms, and a modern vocation in traditional terms. In his poetry, too, one often finds a delicate balance of such opposing elements as realism and fantasy, objective description and subjective expression. The theme of several of his most moving writings in prose and verse was the coexistence of two other sorts of opposites—himself dying and the living natural world around him. In his diaries as well he tended to perceive the world itself as a series of dualities, reminiscent of the parallelisms of the Sino-Japanese prose he had studied as a child. The ability to balance conflicting elements, to hold two opposites in ? the mind at once—what I would call "dual-consciousness”—was I characteristic of Shiki. He himself, at least as a haiku poet, may be seen as a moment in time when such conflicting currents existed in harmony, in a precarious balance of tension, much like a brief peace between warring powers, or the undifferentiated chaos at the beginning of the world (a metaphor suggested by the image of Shiki as a poetic progenitor). After Shiki’s death, his two chief haiku disciples, Kawa higashi Hekigoto and Takahama Kyoshi, split into two separate groups. From Hekigoto and his followers came the free-meter haiku, which did away with syllabic rules and gave rise to some of the most I innovative modern poets, such as Nakazuka Ippekiro. From Kyoshi i came the more conservative current, which conceived of the haiku as ! Preface realistic descriptions of nature and from which emerged such poets as Mizuhara Shuoshi and Nakamura Kusadao.1 In the tanka, the development of Shiki’s ideas proceeded in more of a straight line. His stress on observation and his ideas on the sketch from life were later elaborated into a coherent aesthetic theory by Saito Mokichi and others, while in his short tanka and haiku sequences we can see the beginnings of the longer modern tanka and haiku sequences. Most of Shiki’s writing was autobiographical. In general, literature in Japan tends to be more overtly autobiographical than in Europe and North America. Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Confessions would probably have been considered an autobiographical novel {watakushi sbosetsu) had it been written in Japanese. It may seem an example of the biographical fallacy to assume that the "I” of Shiki’s writings was identical with Shiki himself, but I have done so because Shiki himself wrote as if he meant us to take them that way, and also because it is virtually impossible to distinguish between the real Shiki and the Active Shiki. In fact, in the last few years of his life, the Active Shiki seems to me to have been necessary to the existence of the real Shiki and vice versa: at a certain point in his life, when he could no longer leave his bed, Shiki’s life ceased to exist except in and through words; here, the literature and the life became one and indistinguishable. Although this book is the Arst critical biography of Shiki in English, I have been preceded by numerous Japanese scholars and am heavily indebted to them. In matters that are beyond dispute, such as the factual details of Shiki’s life, I have not felt it necessary to give speciAc attribution. Where I am indebted for interpretations, this is so indicated either in note or in text. Unless otherwise indicated, however, I am responsible for all interpretations of Shiki’s poems, ideas, and broader matters. Some of my main points concern areas that have not been, to my knowledge, explored by Japanese scholars. For example, in Chapters 4 and 5, I try to place Shiki’s diaries within the context of traditional literature, particularly the poetic diary2 and classical haiku prose. I also trace, in Chapter 3, a common theme in the haiku, tanka, and prose of Shiki’s last years. Again, at least one example of the duality of MASAOKA SHIKI consciousness which I feel is central to Shiki, will be found in every chapter.