Woodland Horsetail #1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

ATTACHMENT SS2 REGION 2 SENSITIVE SPECIES EVALUATION FORM Species: Equisetum sylvaticum / Woodland Horsetail Criteria Rank Rationale Literature Citations Region 2 represents the southcentral portion of Woodland horsetail’s distribution. • Dorn 1982 1 A In Wyoming, it is known only from the Black Hills National Forest (Crook County) and Distribution • Dorn 2001 within R2 the Bighorn Mountains (Sheridan County) in Bighorn National Forest. It also occurs in • Evert and Hartman 1984 South Dakota. • Fertig 1999 • Fertig 2000a Woodland horsetail is found in wet meadows, marshes, streambanks, and moist • Fertig 2000b woods, often on subacidic soils (Lellinger 1985) from 4000-5900 feet in elevation. • Fertig 2000c • Larson and Johnson 1999 • Nature Serve 2002 • Neighbours and Culver 1990 • University of Wyoming 1998 Confidence in Rank High • Welp et al. 2000 Outside of Region 2, Woodland horsetail occurs from Alaska to Newfoundland south to • Fertig 2000a 2 C Washington, Wyoming, South Dakota, Iowa, and West Virginia. Distribution • Great Plains Flora outside R2 Association 1986 • Hitchcock et al. 1969 Confidence in Rank High • Lellinger 1985 • Nature Serve 2002 3 C Woodland horsetail has a limited spore dispersal period, and spores are short-lived. • Fertig 2000a Sexual reproduction is limited by the gametophyte’s narrow habitat tolerance. Dispersal • USDA Forest Service 2002 Capability Woodland horsetail also colonizes recently burned areas by wind-dispersed spores. Wood horsetail primarily reproduces by vegetative means; the majority of shoots arise from rhizomes. Woodland horsetail survives repeated fires by means of deeply buried rhizomes that are apparently almost indestructible. The extensive rhizome system penetrates well into mineral soil or clay, allowing revegetation even after severe fire. Its phenotypic plasticity enables it to survive the environmental changes associated with postfire succession. Such adaptations offer resistance to disturbances as well as the ability to disperse over unsuitable habitats. Confidence in Rank Medium USDA-Forest Service R2 Sensitive Species Evaluation Form Page 1 of 5 ATTACHMENT SS2 Species: Equisetum sylvaticum / Woodland Horsetail Criteria Rank Rationale Literature Citations Woodland horsetail is known from 3 occurrences in Wyoming, all of which have been • Fertig 2000a 4 A located since 1983 (most recently in 1999). One population at Preacher Rock Bog Abundance in • NatureServe 2002 R2 numbered in the thousands in July 1999 as indicated by stem counts (ramets). The • University of Wyoming 2002 total area of occupied habitat, however, is quite limited (less than 15 acres) and the total number of genets may be significantly lower than ramets. Population counts are not available from the Black Hills. It is currently ranked “S1” in Wyoming. It is present but not ranked in South Dakota. Confidence in Rank High 5 D Not known. • - Population Trend in R2 Confidence in Rank High 6 D Not known. • - Habitat Trend in R2 Confidence in Rank High Woodland horsetail may be vulnerable to habitat loss from wetland draining, logging, • Fertig 2000a 7 BD or high recreation use. It occurs on Black Hills and Bighorn national forests, which are Habitat • University of Wyoming 1998 Vulnerability managed for multiple use. or Modification Confidence in Rank Low USDA-Forest Service R2 Sensitive Species Evaluation Form Page 2 of 5 ATTACHMENT SS2 Species: Equisetum sylvaticum / Woodland Horsetail Criteria Rank Rationale Literature Citations Woodland horsetail is a perennial, deciduous, homosporous pteridophyte. Fertile • Fertig 2000a 8 D stems are at first unbranched and lack chlorophyll but become branched and green Life History • Hitchcock et al. 1969 and after spores are released. Strobili are usually 1 inch (3 cm) long and are borne on • University of Wyoming 1998 Demographics short stalks at the apices of fertile stems. The spores germinate to produce a distinct • USDA Forest Service 2002 gametophytic generation. Spores are produced in strobili in May and early June. Woodland horsetail has extensive creeping rhizomes, which may outweigh aerial shoots by a ratio of 100 to 1. Life history information on this species, including life history stages, population structure, longevity, mortality, pollination biology and spore/gamete biology, are not available. Confidence in Rank High Initial Evaluator(s): Date: February 6, 2002 Scott Laursen and Bonnie Heidel National Forests in the Rocky Mountain Region where species is KNOWN (K) or LIKELY(L)1 to occur: Colorado NF/NG Kansas NF/NG Nebraska NF/NG South Dakota Wyoming NF/NG NF/NG y y y y y Known Likel Known Likel Known Likel Known Likel Known Likel Arapaho-Roosevelt NF Cimmaron NG Samuel R.McKelvie NF Black Hills NF ? Shoshone NF White River NF Halsey NF Buffalo Gap NG Bighorn NF X Routt NF Nebraska NF Ft. Pierre NG Black Hills NF X Grand Mesa, Ogalala NG Medicine Bow NF Uncompahgre, Gunnison NF San Juan NF Thunder Basin NG Rio Grande NF Pike-San Isabel NF Comanche NG Literature cited 1 Likely is defined as more likely to occur than not occur on the National Forest or Grassland. This generally can be thought of as having a 50% chance or greater of appearing on NFS lands. USDA-Forest Service R2 Sensitive Species Evaluation Form Page 3 of 5 ATTACHMENT SS2 Dorn, R.D. 1983. Lycopodium complanatum and L. annotinum found in the Black Hills. American Fern Journal 73: 62. Dorn, R.D. 2001. Vascular Plants of Wyoming, third edition. Mountain West Publishing, Cheyenne, WY. Evert, E. F. and R. L. Hartman. 1984. Additions to the Vascular Flora of Wyoming. Great Basin Naturalist 44: 482-483. Fertig, W. 1999. The status of rare plants in the Bighorn Landscape. Report prepared for The Nature Conservancy Wyoming Field Office by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Laramie, Wyoming. Fertig, W. 2000a. State Species Abstract: Equisetum sylvaticum. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database. Available on the internet at www.uwyo.edu/wyndd Fertig, W. 2000b. Target plant species and potential plant conservation sites in the Wyoming portion of the Black Hills Ecoregion. Report prepared for The Nature Conservancy Midwest Science Division by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Laramie, WY. Fertig, W. 2000c. Rare vascular plant species in the Wyoming portion of the Utah-Wyoming Rocky Mountains Ecoregion. Prepared for the Wyoming Nature Conservancy by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Laramie, WY. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Univ. Kansas Press, Lawrence, KS. Hitchcock, C.L., A. Cronquist, and M. Owenbey. 1969. Pt. 1. Vascular Cryptograms, Gymnosperms, and Monocotyledons, IN: Hitchcock, C.L., A. Cronquist, M. Owenbey, and J.W. Thompson (eds). Vascular Plants of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Publications in Biology 17(1): 1- 914. Larson, G.E. and J.R. Johnson. 1999. Plants of the Black Hills and Bear Lodge Mountains. South Dakota State University College of Agriculture and Biological Sciences & South Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station, Brookings, SD. Lellinger, D.B. 1985. A Field Manual of the Ferns and Fern Allies of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D. C. NatureServe. 2002. Explorer – an encyclopedia of life. Plant and animal data posted at www.natureserveexplorer.org, Arlington, VA. Neighbours, M. and D. Culver. 1990. 1989 Floristic survey of Preacher Rock Bog, Bighorn National Forest, Wyoming. Report prepared for the Tongue Ranger District, Bighorn National Forest, by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Laramie, WY. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (2002, February). Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/2002. University of Wyoming – Rocky Mountain Herbarium. 1998. Atlas of the Flora of Wyoming. Posted electronically through 1998 at: http://www.esb.utexas.edu/tchumley/wyomap/ and unposted accession information at the Rocky Mountain Herbarium through 2001. Welp, L., W.F. Fertig, G.P. Jones, G.P. Beauvais, and S.M. Ogle. 2000. Fine filter analysis of the Bighorn, Medicine Bow, and Shoshone National Forests in Wyoming. Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Laramie, WY. USDA-Forest Service R2 Sensitive Species Evaluation Form Page 4 of 5 ATTACHMENT SS2 USDA-Forest Service R2 Sensitive Species Evaluation Form Page 5 of 5 .
Recommended publications
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts

    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts

    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
  • <I>Equisetum Giganteum</I>

    <I>Equisetum Giganteum</I>

    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-24-2009 Ecophysiology and Biomechanics of Equisetum Giganteum in South America Chad Eric Husby Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI10022522 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Husby, Chad Eric, "Ecophysiology and Biomechanics of Equisetum Giganteum in South America" (2009). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 200. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/200 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida ECOPHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS OF EQUISETUM GIGANTEUM IN SOUTH AMERICA A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in BIOLOGY by Chad Eric Husby 2009 To: Dean Kenneth Furton choose the name of dean of your college/school College of Arts and Sciences choose the name of your college/school This dissertation, written by Chad Eric Husby, and entitled Ecophysiology and Biomechanics of Equisetum Giganteum in South America, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. _______________________________________ Bradley C. Bennett _______________________________________ Jack B. Fisher _______________________________________ David W. Lee _______________________________________ Leonel Da Silveira Lobo O'Reilly Sternberg _______________________________________ Steven F. Oberbauer, Major Professor Date of Defense: March 24, 2009 The dissertation of Chad Eric Husby is approved.
  • Contribution to the Urban Flora of Zagreb (Croatia)

    Contribution to the Urban Flora of Zagreb (Croatia)

    NAT. CROAT. VOL. 21 No 2 357¿372 ZAGREB December 31, 2012 original scientific paper / izvorni znanstveni rad CONTRIBUTION TO THE URBAN FLORA OF ZAGREB (CROATIA) TOMISLAV HUDINA1*,BEHIJA SALKI]1, ANJA RIMAC1, SANDRO BOGDANOVI]2 & TONI NIKOLI]1 1University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science, Division of Biology, Department of Botany and Botanical Garden, Maruli}ev trg 9a, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia 2University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Botany, Sveto{imunska 25, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia Hudina, T., Salki}, B., Rimac, A., Bogdanovi}, S. & Nikoli}, T.: Contribution to the urban flora of Zagreb (Croatia). Vol. 21, No. 2., 357–372, 2012, Zagreb. The process of urbanization is one of the most extreme forms of anthropogenic habitat modifica- tion. Negative trends and their effects on the one hand, and concern for the preservation of bio- diversity and quality of city life on the other, are the initiators of urban flora research. The flora of urban areas in Croatia has not been the subject of sustained research and therefore floristic records for most of the larger cities are unknown. The research area is located in northwest Croatia in the city of Zagreb, on the right bank of the Sava River. In the area of Konopljenka and Pi{korovo a total of 351 taxa of vascular plants belonging to 81 families were recorded. Seven of them (2%) were pteridophytes (Equisetidae), two of them (0.6%) gymnosperms (Pinidae), and others were angio- sperms (Magnoliidae). Among angiosperms, 71 taxa (20.2%) belong to monocotyledons (superorder Lilianae) and the other 271 taxa (77.2%) from 65 families belong to other superorders of angio- sperms.
  • Ferns of the National Forests in Alaska

    Ferns of the National Forests in Alaska United States Forest Service R10-RG-182 Department of Alaska Region June 2010 Agriculture Ferns abound in Alaska’s two national forests, the Chugach and the Tongass, which are situated on the southcentral and southeastern coast respectively. These forests contain myriad habitats where ferns thrive. Most showy are the ferns occupying the forest floor of temperate rainforest habitats. However, ferns grow in nearly all non-forested habitats such as beach meadows, wet meadows, alpine meadows, high alpine, and talus slopes. The cool, wet climate highly influenced by the Pacific Ocean creates ideal growing conditions for ferns. In the past, ferns had been loosely grouped with other spore-bearing vascular plants, often called “fern allies.” Recent genetic studies reveal surprises about the relationships among ferns and fern allies. First, ferns appear to be closely related to horsetails; in fact these plants are now grouped as ferns. Second, plants commonly called fern allies (club-mosses, spike-mosses and quillworts) are not at all related to the ferns. General relationships among members of the plant kingdom are shown in the diagram below. Ferns & Horsetails Flowering Plants Conifers Club-mosses, Spike-mosses & Quillworts Mosses & Liverworts Thirty of the fifty-four ferns and horsetails known to grow in Alaska’s national forests are described and pictured in this brochure. They are arranged in the same order as listed in the fern checklist presented on pages 26 and 27. 2 Midrib Blade Pinnule(s) Frond (leaf) Pinna Petiole (leaf stalk) Parts of a fern frond, northern wood fern (p.
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Horsetails (Equisetum) Including Chloroplast Atpb Sequences

    Molecular Phylogeny of Horsetails (Equisetum) Including Chloroplast Atpb Sequences

    J Plant Res DOI 10.1007/s10265-007-0088-x SHORT COMMUNICATION Molecular phylogeny of horsetails (Equisetum) including chloroplast atpB sequences Jean-Michel Guillon Received: 9 November 2006 / Accepted: 21 March 2007 Ó The Botanical Society of Japan and Springer 2007 Abstract Equisetum is a genus of 15 extant species that dependent on vegetative reproduction for persistence and are the sole surviving representatives of the class Sphen- growth. The 15 species of Equisetum are grouped in two opsida. The generally accepted taxonomy of Equisetum subgenera based on morphological characters such as the recognizes two subgenera: Equisetum and Hippochaete. position of stomata: superficial in subgenus Equisetum (E. Two recent phylogenetical studies have independently arvense, E. bogotense, E. diffusum, E. fluviatile, E. pa- questioned the monophyly of subgenus Equisetum. Here, I lustre, E. pratense, E. sylvaticum, and E. telmateia), use original (atpB) and published (rbcL, trnL-trnF, rps4) sunken below the epidermal surface in subgenus Hippo- sequence data to investigate the phylogeny of the genus. chaete (E. giganteum, E. hyemale, E. laevigatum, Analyses of atpB sequences give an unusual topology, with E. myriochaetum, E. ramosissimum, E. scirpoides, and E. bogotense branching within Hippochaete. A Bayesian E. variegatum). A barrier seems to prevent hybridization analysis based on all available sequences yields a tree with between plants of the subgenera Equisetum and Hippo- increased resolution, favoring the sister relationships of chaete (Duckett 1979). E. bogotense with subgenus Hippochaete. Because characters found in the fossil record, such as large stems and persistent sheath teeth, are present in the Keywords Equisetum Á Evolution Á Horsetail Á Phylogeny sole E.
  • Ferns Robert H

    Ferns Robert H

    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Illustrated Flora of Illinois Southern Illinois University Press 10-1999 Ferns Robert H. Mohlenbrock Southern Illinois University Carbondale Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/siupress_flora_of_illinois Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Mohlenbrock, Robert H., "Ferns" (1999). Illustrated Flora of Illinois. 3. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/siupress_flora_of_illinois/3 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Southern Illinois University Press at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Illustrated Flora of Illinois by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF ILLINOIS ROBERT H. MOHLENBROCK, General Editor THE ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF ILLINOIS s Second Edition Robert H. Mohlenbrock SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY PRESS Carbondale and Edwardsville COPYRIGHT© 1967 by Southern Illinois University Press SECOND EDITION COPYRIGHT © 1999 by the Board of Trustees, Southern Illinois University All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 02 01 00 99 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mohlenbrock, Robert H., 1931- Ferns I Robert H. Mohlenbrock. - 2nd ed. p. em.- (The illustrated flora of Illinois) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Ferns-Illinois-Identification. 2. Ferns-Illinois-Pictorial works. 3. Ferns-Illinois-Geographical distribution-Maps. 4. Botanical illustration. I. Title. II. Series. QK525.5.I4M6 1999 587'.3'09773-dc21 99-17308 ISBN 0-8093-2255-2 (cloth: alk. paper) CIP The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984.§ This book is dedicated to Miss E.
  • European Lycopods and Ferns

    European Lycopods and Ferns

    European Red List of Lycopods and Ferns Mariana García Criado, Henry Väre, Ana Nieto, Rui Bento Elias, Robert Dyer, Yury Ivanenko, Daniella Ivanova, Richard Lansdown, José Antonio Molina, Germinal Rouhan, Fred Rumsey, Angelo Troia, Jan Vrba and Maarten J. M. Christenhusz European Red List of Lycopods and Ferns Mariana García Criado, Henry Väre, Ana Nieto, Rui Bento Elias, Robert Dyer, Yury Ivanenko, Daniella Ivanova, Richard Lansdown, José Antonio Molina, Germinal Rouhan, Fred Rumsey, Angelo Troia, Jan Vrba and Maarten J. M. Christenhusz The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. This publication has been prepared by IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) as a deliverable of the LIFE European Red Lists project (LIFE14 PRE/BE/000001). Project Title: Establishing a European Red List of Bryophytes, Pteridophytes, Saproxylic Beetles, Terrestrial Molluscs and Vascular Plants (LIFE European Red Lists; LIFE14 PRE/BE/000001). Project duration: May 2015 to December 2018. Project’s total costs: 1,166,667 EUR. Contribution of the LIFE Programme: 700,000 EUR. The LIFE Programme (http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/index.htm) is the EU’s financial instrument supporting environmental, nature conservation and climate action projects throughout the EU. The general objective of LIFE is to contribute to the implementation, updating and development of EU environmental, nature conservation and climate policy and legislation by co- financing projects with European added value.
  • Njplantlist.Pdf

    Njplantlist.Pdf

    List of Endangered Plant Species and Plant Species of Concern June 2016 Scientific Name Common Name G Rank S Rank Federal Status State Status Other Status Abies balsamea Balsam Fir G5 S1 E LP, HL Acorus americanus American Sweetflag G5 S1? HL Actaea rubra var. rubra Red Baneberry G5T5 S2 HL Adlumia fungosa Climbing Fumitory G4 S2 HL Aeschynomene virginica Sensitive Joint-vetch G2 S1 LT E LP, HL Agalinis auriculata Ear-leaf False Foxglove G3 SX HL Agalinis fasciculata Pine Barren Foxglove G5 S3 HL Agalinis paupercula var. paupercula Small-flower False Foxglove G5T5 S2 HL Agastache nepetoides Yellow Giant-hyssop G5 S2 HL Agastache scrophulariifolia Purple Giant-hyssop G4 S2 HL Agrimonia microcarpa Small-fruit Grooveburr G5 S2 HL Agrostis geminata Ticklegrass G5 S1? HL Alisma triviale Large Water-plantain G5 S1 E LP, HL Alopecurus aequalis var. aequalis Short-awn Meadow-foxtail G5T5 S2 HL Alopecurus carolinianus Tufted Meadow-foxtail G5 S3 HL Amaranthus pumilus Seabeach Amaranth G2 S1 LT E LP, HL Amelanchier humilis Low Service-berry G5 S1S2 HL Amelanchier nantucketensis Nantucket Service-berry G3Q S1 HL Amelanchier sanguinea var. sanguinea Round-leaf Service-berry G5T5 S1.1 E LP, HL Amelanchier stolonifera Running Service-berry G5 S3 HL Amianthium muscitoxicum Fly Poison G4G5 S2 HL Ammannia latifolia Koehn's Toothcup G5 S1 E LP, HL Andromeda polifolia var. glaucophylla Bog Rosemary G5T5 S1 E LP, HL Andropogon glomeratus var. hirsutior Hairy Beardgrass G5T5 SH.1 HL Andropogon gyrans Elliott's Beardgrass G5 S2 HL Andropogon ternarius var. ternarius Silvery Beardgrass G5T5? S2 HL Anemone canadensis Canada Anemone G5 SX HL Anemone cylindrica Long-head Anemone G5 S1 E LP, HL Anemone virginiana var.
  • Club Mosses, Ferns & Horsetails: the Seed-Free Vascular Plants

    Club Mosses, Ferns & Horsetails: the Seed-Free Vascular Plants

    Club Mosses, Ferns & Horsetails: the Seed-free Vascular Plants Vascular Plants - a quick review Two unrelated groups within “cryptogams” – seed free vascular plants – are recognized as phyla: 1. Lycopodiophyta : lycopods 2. Polypodiophyta: ferns, horsetails, and whisk ferns Vascular Plants - a quick review Why were the seed-free plants “grouped” together? They produce free spores, the principal dispersal units, via meiosis. Spore: a reproductive cell, capable of developing into an adult without fusion with another cell. spores Vascular Plants - a quick review Why were the seed-free plants “grouped” together? Spores develop within a sporangium (pl. sporangia) sporangium spores Vascular Plants - a quick review Why were the seed-free plants “grouped” together? Spores germinate and develop into gametophytes that exist independently of the spore-producing plants. The gametophytes (haploid, n) tend to be inconspicuous and short-lived. sporangium gametophyte spores Vascular Plants - a quick review Why were the seed-free plants “grouped” together? Like all plants, seed-free plants produce two kinds of gametes in their gametophytes: sperm and egg that unite to form a zygote (2n or diploid) via fertilization! sporangium zygote gametophyte spores Vascular Plants - a quick review Why were the seed-free plants “grouped” together? The sporophyte (2n) develops from the zygote and is more conspicuous, usually perennial and lives for an indefinite period! sporangium sporophyte zygote gametophyte spores Wisconsin Seed-free Plants The best website to identify
  • The Comparative Study of Equisetum Pratense, E. Sylvaticum, E. Telmateia: Accumulation of Silicon, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Screening

    The Comparative Study of Equisetum Pratense, E. Sylvaticum, E. Telmateia: Accumulation of Silicon, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Screening

    The Comparative Study of Equisetum pratense, E. sylvaticum, E. telmateia: Accumulation of Silicon, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Screening DENISA BATIR MARIN1,2, OANA CIOANCA1, MIHAI APOSTU1*, CRISTINA GABRIELA TUCHILUS1, CORNELIA MIRCEA1, SILVIA ROBU2, DANA TUTUNARU2, ANDREIA CORCIOVA1, MONICA HANCIANU1 1Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy,16 Universitatii Str., 700115 , Iasi, Romania 2 Dunarea de Jos University Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Science Department,47 Domneasca Str., 800008, Galai, Romania The objective of the current study is represented by the determination of silica and a phytochemical screening of phenolic derivates of some Equisetum species. The antioxidant and antimicrobial activity for Equisetum pratense Ehrh.,, Equisetum sylvaticum L. and Equisetum telmateia Ehrh. (sin. Equisetum maximum Lam.) were also investigated. The concentration of silicon (Si) in plants was determined by the spectrophotometric method using previous treatment with NaOH 50% both for the stem and the nodal branches [1]. Results obtained varied from 95.12 to 162.10 SiO2 mg/g dry plant which represents 4.44% to 7.58% Si/100g dry sample. Two types of total extracts were obtained using different solvents and were subjected to qualitative and quantitative chemical analysis considering total phenolic content [2]. The highest concentration of investigated compounds was found in the methanolic extract, E. sylvaticum, 196.5mg/g dry sample. Antioxidant activity was monitored spectrophotometrically and expressed in terms of IC50 (µg/mL) [3]. Values gathered ranged from 261.7 to 429.5 µg/mL. The highest capacity to neutralized DPPH radicals was found in E. sylvaticum. In vitro antimicrobial activity was determined using difusimetric method [4].
  • Pteridophytes As Ecological Indicators: an Overview1

    Pteridophytes As Ecological Indicators: an Overview1

    Hoehnea 46(1): e522018, 4 tab., 2 fig., 2019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2236-8906-52/2018 Pteridophytes as ecological indicators: an overview1 Aline Possamai Della2,3 and Daniel de Barcellos Falkenberg2 Received: 25 May 2018; accepted: 10 December 2018 How to cite: Della, A.P. & Falkenberg, D.B. 2019. Pteridophytes as ecological indicators: an overview. Hoehnea 46: e522018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2236-8906-52/2018. ABSTRACT - (Pteridophytes as ecological indicators: an overview). The pteridophytes present a great but poorly explored potential as ecological indicators (EIs), shown only in some sparse studies. Therefore, to analyze this potential, we reviewed published articles, websites, or books with pteridophytes as EIs, searching on five scholar databases and also on Google. We selected 134 studies, conducted in all continents (118 in mainland areas and 16 in islands). Brazil is the country with the highest number of studies (N = 33). In general, several species were considered as EIs in a given study, not only a single. The use of Pteridophytes in these works was classified in seven different types: a) classification of vegetation, soils, environments, and ecosystems (N = 65), b) environmental integrity (or quality) (N = 21), c) disturbance (N = 17), d) regeneration/restoration of habitats and/or ecosystems (N = 10), e) climate changes (N = 10), f) contamination of air, soil, or water (N = 14), and g) association with other groups of organisms (N = 12). The vast majority of these studies merely hypothesized the potential use of the Pteridophytes as EIs, with few presenting helpful criteria for the selection of EIs.
  • Review Article Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of the Genus Equisetum (Equisetaceae): a Narrative Review of the Species with Therapeutic Potential for Kidney Diseases

    Hindawi Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Volume 2021, Article ID 6658434, 17 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6658434 Review Article Phytochemistry and Pharmacology of the Genus Equisetum (Equisetaceae): A Narrative Review of the Species with Therapeutic Potential for Kidney Diseases Thaise Boeing ,1 Karyne Garcia Tafarelo Moreno ,2 Arquimedes Gasparotto Junior ,2 Luisa Mota da Silva ,3 and Priscila de Souza 3 1Escola de Ciˆencias Farmacˆeuticas de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de Saõ Paulo, Ribeiraõ Preto, Saõ Paulo, Brazil 2Laborato´rio de Farmacologia Cardiovascular (LaFaC), Faculdade de Cieˆncias da Sau´de, Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Dourados, MS, Brazil 3Programa de P´os-Graduação em Ciˆencias Farmacˆeuticas, N´ucleo de Investigações Qu´ımico-Farmacˆeuticas, Universidade do Vale do Itaja´ı, Itaja´ı, Brazil Correspondence should be addressed to aise Boeing; [email protected] and Priscila de Souza; [email protected] Received 20 October 2020; Revised 11 January 2021; Accepted 15 January 2021; Published 5 March 2021 Academic Editor: Sebastian Granica Copyright © 2021 aise Boeing et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. e Equisetum genus, Equisetaceae family, is widely distributed worldwide and may be the oldest nonextinct genus on Earth. ere are about 30 known species, which are very often used in traditional medicine with diverse applications. is review aimed to compile scientific reports about Equisetum species with relevant pharmacological properties and/or therapeutic potential for kidney diseases. Our bibliographic survey demonstrates that the most widespread traditional use of Equisetum is as a diuretic, followed by the treatment of genitourinary diseases (kidney diseases, urethritis, kidney stones, and others), inflammation, wound healing, rheumatic diseases, prostatitis, and hypertension.