RI Rare Plants 2016 Simple List

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RI Rare Plants 2016 Simple List PREPARED BY Rhode Island Rare Plants 2016 1 of 8 RI NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY From R.W. Enser 2007 and Taxonomy follows FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY RI Wildlife Action Plan 2015, Appendix 1d gobotany.newenglandwild.org 2016 2007 RI 2016 RI Seeking line # Species # Group Family Genus-species Epithet Status Status More Info 1 PTERIDOPHYTES 2 Aspleniaceae (Spleenwort Family) 3 2016-1 Asplenium montanum Mountain Spleenwort SE SE 4 2016-2 Asplenium rhizophyllum Walking Spleenwort SE SE 5 2016-3 Asplenium trichomanes Delicate Maidenhair Spleenwort C C 6 Equisetaceae (Horsetail Family) 7 2016-4 Equisetum fluviatile River Horsetail C C 8 2016-5 Equisetum hyemale ssp. affine Rough Horsetail C C 9 2016-6 Equisetum variegatum Variegated Scouring Rush SE SE 10 2016-7 Equisetum sylvaticum Wood Horsetail C C 11 Isoetaceae (Quillwort Family) 12 2016-8 Isoetes echinospora ssp. muricata Spiny-spored Quillwort C C 13 2016-9 Isoetes engelmannii Engelmann's Quillwort C C 14 2016-10 Isoetes riparia var. canadensis Canadian Shore Quillwort C C 15 2016-11 Isoetes x eatonii Eaton’s Quillwort SH SH 16 Lycopodiaceae (Clubmoss Family) 17 2016-12 Lycopodiella alopecuroides Foxtail Bog-clubmoss SE SE 18 2016-13 Lycopodium lagopus One-cone Clubmoss SE 19 2016-14 Spinulum annotinum Common Interrupted Clubmoss SE SE 20 Lygodiaceae (Climbing Fern Family) 21 2016-15 Lygodium palmatum American Climbing Fern C C 22 Onocleaceae (Sensitive Fern Family) 23 2016-16 Matteuccia struthiopteris ssp. pensylvanica Fiddlehead Fern C C 24 Ophioglossaceae (Adder's-tongue Family) 25 2016-17 Botrychium angustisegmentum Narrow Triangle Moonwort C C 26 2016-18 Botrychium matricariifolium Daisy-leaved Moonwort C C 27 2016-19 Botrychium oneidense Blunt-lobed Grape-fern SH SE 28 2016-20 Botrychium tenebrosum Swamp Moonwort C * 29 2016-21 Botrychium virginianum Rattlesnake Fern C 30 2016-22 Ophioglossum pusillum Northern Adder's-tongue Fern SE SE 31 Pteridaceae (Maidenhair Fern Family) 32 2016-23 Pellaea atropurpurea Purple Cliff-brake SE SE 33 Selaginllaceae (Spikemoss Family) 34 2016-24 Selaginella rupestris Ledge Spikemoss C * 35 Thelypteridaceae (Marsh Fern Family) 36 2016-25 Phegopteris connectilis Long Beech Fern ST C 37 Woodsiaceae (Wood-fern Family) 38 2016-26 Athyrium asplenioides Southern Lady Fern C * 39 2016-27 Gymnocarpium dryopteris Northern Oak Fern ST ST 40 2016-28 Woodsia ilvensis Rusty Cliff Fern SH SH 41 GYMNOSPERMS 42 Pinaceae (Pine Family) 43 2016-29 Larix laricina American Larch ST ST 44 2016-30 Picea mariana Black Spruce C C 45 Taxaceae (Yew Family) 46 2016-31 Taxus canadensis American Yew C C 47 ANGIOSPERMS 48 Adoxaceae (Elderberry Family) 49 2016-32 Sambucus racemosa Red Elderberry SH SH 50 2016-33 Viburnum lantanoides Hobblebush C C 51 2016-34 Viburnum nudum var. nudum Withe-rod SH SH 52 Aizoaceae (Iceplant Family) 53 2016-35 Sesuvium maritimum Annual Sea-purslane C * 54 Alismataceae (Water-Plantain Family) 55 2016-36 Helanthium tenellum Dwarf Burhead SH 56 2016-37 Sagittaria graminea var. graminea Grass-leaved Arrowhead C C 57 2016-38 Sagittaria subulata Awl-leaved Arrowhead SH SH 58 2016-39 Sagittaria teres Quill-leaved Arrowhead SE SE 59 Alliaceae (Onion Family) 60 2016-40 Allium tricoccum var. tricoccum Wild Leek C C 61 Amaranthaceae (Amaranth Family) 62 2016-41 Amaranthus pumilus Seabeach Amaranth FT/SH FT/SH 63 2016-42 Atriplex glabriuscula Bracted Orache C C 64 2016-43 Atriplex subspicata Saline Orache C * Send comments, suggestions, and corrections to: [email protected], re:rare plant list correct: 1/24/2017 DWG PREPARED BY Rhode Island Rare Plants 2016 2 of 8 RI NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY From R.W. Enser 2007 and Taxonomy follows FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY RI Wildlife Action Plan 2015, Appendix 1d gobotany.newenglandwild.org 2016 2007 RI 2016 RI Seeking line # Species # Group Family Genus-species Epithet Status Status More Info 65 2016-44 Chenopodium berlandieri var. bushianum Pit-seeded Goosefoot C * 66 2016-45 Chenopodium leptophyllum Narrow-leaved Goosefoot C C 67 2016-46 Suaeda calceoliformis American Sea-blite C * 68 2016-47 Suaeda maritima ssp. richii Herbaceous Sea-blite C * 69 Apiaceae (Parsley Family) 70 2016-48 Angelica atropurpurea Purple-stemmed Angelica SE SE 71 2016-49 Angelica lucida Seaside Angelica ST ST 72 2016-50 Aralia racemosa American Spikenard C C 73 2016-51 Cryptotaenia canadensis Canada Honewort C C 74 2016-52 Hydrocotyle verticillata Whorled Marsh-pennywort SH SH 75 2016-53 Ligusticum scothicum Scotch Wild Lovage C C 76 2016-54 Lilaeopsis chinensis Eastern Grasswort SE SE 77 2016-55 Osmorhiza longistylis Long-styled Sweet-cicely ST ST 78 2016-56 Panax quinquefolius American Ginseng SE SE 79 2016-57 Ptilimnium capillaceum Atlantic Mock Bishop's-weed C C 80 2016-58 Sanicula canadensis var. canadensis Canada Sanicle C * 81 2016-59 Taenidia integerrima Yellow Pimpernel SH SH 82 2016-60 Zizia aptera Heart-leaved Golden Alexanders SH SH 83 Apocynaceae (Dogbane Family) 84 2016-61 Asclepias amplexicaulis Clasping Milkweed C C 85 2016-62 Asclepias exaltata Poke Milkweed C C 86 2016-63 Asclepias purpurascens Purple Milkweed SH SE 87 2016-64 Asclepias quadrifolia Four-leaved Milkweed ST ST 88 2016-65 Asclepias tuberosa Butterfly Milkweed C C 89 2016-66 Asclepias verticillata Whorled Milkweed C C 90 Araceae (Arum Family) 91 2016-67 Calla palustris Wild Calla C 92 2016-68 Lemna perpusilla Minute Duckweed C * 93 2016-69 Lemna turionifera Turion Duckweed C * 94 2016-70 Lemna valdiviana Pale Duckweed C * 95 2016-71 Orontium aquaticum Golden Club SE SE 96 Aristoloceaceae (Birthwort Family) 97 2016-72 Asarum canadense Canada Wild Ginger C * 98 Asteraceae (Aster Family) 99 2016-73 Ageratina aromatica Lesser Snakeroot SH SH 100 2016-74 Artemisia campestris ssp. caudata Field Wormwood C C 101 2016-75 Bidens connata Purple-stemmed Beggarticks C C 102 2016-76 Bidens tricosperma Crowned Beggar-ticks C C 103 2016-77 Chrysopsis mariana Maryland Golden-aster ST SE 104 2016-78 Cirsium horridulum var. horridulum Yellow Thistle ST ST 105 2016-79 Coreopsis rosea Pink Tickseed C C 106 2016-80 Doellingeria infirma Appalachian White-aster SH SH 107 2016-81 Eupatorium novae-angliae New England Thoroughwort SE SE 108 2016-82 Eurybia macrophylla Large-leaved Wood-aster C C 109 2016-83 Gamochaeta purpurea Purple Cudweed SH SH 110 2016-84 Helianthus divaricatus Woodland Sunflower C C 111 2016-85 Helianthus strumosus Pale-leaved Sunflower C * 112 2016-86 Liatris novae-angliae var. novae-angliae Northern Blazing Star SE SE 113 2016-87 Nabulus serpentarius Lion's-foot Rattlesnakeroot C C 114 2016-88 Oligoneuron rigidum var. rigidum Stiff Flat-topped-goldenrod SH SH 115 2016-89 Packera obovata Running Groundsel C * 116 2016-90 Petasites frigidus var. palmatus Northern Sweet-coltsfoot SE SE 117 2016-91 Pityopsis falcata Sickle-leaved Silk-grass C C 118 2016-92 Rudbeckia laciniata var. laciniata Green-headed Coneflower ST ST 119 2016-93 Sclerolepis uniflora Sclerolepis SE SE 120 2016-94 Senecio suaveolens False Indian-plantain SH SH 121 2016-95 Solidago flexicaulis Zig-zag Goldenrod ST ST 122 2016-96 Solidago latissimifolia Elliott's Goldenrod C ST 123 2016-97 Symphyotrichum concolor ssp. concolor Eastern Silver American-aster SH SH 124 2016-98 Symphyotrichum laeve Smooth American-aster C C 125 Berberidaceae (Barberry Family) 126 2016-99 Caulophyllum thalictroides Blue Cohosh ST ST 127 Boraginaceae (Borage Family) 128 2016-100 Hackelia virginiana Virginia Stickseed C * Send comments, suggestions, and corrections to: [email protected], re:rare plant list correct: 1/24/2017 DWG PREPARED BY Rhode Island Rare Plants 2016 3 of 8 RI NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY From R.W. Enser 2007 and Taxonomy follows FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY RI Wildlife Action Plan 2015, Appendix 1d gobotany.newenglandwild.org 2016 2007 RI 2016 RI Seeking line # Species # Group Family Genus-species Epithet Status Status More Info 129 2016-101 Onosmodium virginianum Eastern False Gromwell SH SH 130 Brassicaceae (Mustard Family) 131 2016-102 Boechera canadensis Sticklepod Rockcress C * 132 2016-103 Boechera laevigata Smooth Rockcress C * 133 2016-104 Boechera missouriensis Green Rockcress C C * 134 2016-105 Boechera stricta Canada Rockcress C C * 135 2016-106 Draba reptans Carolina Whitlow-mustard SH SH 136 Cactaceae (Cactus Family) 137 2016-107 Opuntia humifusa Eastern Prickly-pear SE SE 138 Campanulaceae (Bluebell Family) 139 2016-108 Lobelia dortmanna Water Lobelia C C 140 Caprifoliaceae (Honeysuckle Family) 141 2016-109 Linnaea borealis ssp. americana American Twinflower SH SH 142 2016-110 Lonicera dioica Wild Honeysuckle C C 143 2016-111 Lonicera sempervirens var. sempervirens Trumpet Honeysuckle C * 144 2016-112 Lonicera villosa Mountain Honeysuckle C C 145 2016-113 Triosteum aurantiacum var. aurantiacum Orange-fruited Horsegentian C C 146 2016-114 Triosteum perfoliatum Perfoliate-leaved Horsegentian C C 147 Caryophyllaceae (Pink Family) 148 2016-115 Honckenya peploides ssp. robusta Sea-side Sandwort C C 149 2016-116 Minuartia caroliniana Pine Barren Sandplant SH SH 150 2016-117 Minuartia glabra Appalachian Sandplant ST ST 151 2016-118 Minuartia michauxii var. michauxii Michaux’s Sandplant SE SE 152 2016-119 Paronychia canadensis Smooth Forked Whitlowwort C * 153 2016-120 Silene stellata Starry Campion SH SH 154 2016-121 Spergularia canadensis Canada Sand-spurry C C * 155 Celastraceae (Staff-tree Family) 156 2016-122 Celastrus scandens American Bittersweet SE 157 Cistaceae (Rock-rose Family) 158 2016-123 Crocanthemum dumosum Bushy Frostweed SE SE 159 2016-124 Crocanthemum propinquum Low Frostweed C C 160 2016-125 Hudsonia ericoides Pine-barren False Heather C ST 161 2016-126 Lechea minor Thyme-leaved Pinweed C C * 162 Convolvulaceae (Bindweed Family) 163 2016-127 Calystegia silvatica ssp. fraterniflora Short-stalked False Bindweed C * 164 2016-128 Cuscuta coryli Hazel Dodder SH SH 165 2016-129 Cuscuta gronovii var.
Recommended publications
  • Acta Botanica Brasilica - 35(1): 46-61
    Acta Botanica Brasilica - 35(1): 46-61. January-March 2021. doi: 10.1590/0102-33062020abb0236 Breaking the misconception of a dry and lifeless semiarid region: the diversity and distribution of aquatic flora in wetlands of the Brazilian Northeast Lígia Queiroz Matias1* , Felipe Martins Guedes2 , Hugo Pereira do Nascimento1 and Júlia Caram Sfair1 Received: May 19, 2020 Accepted: November 19, 2020 . ABSTRACT The semiarid region of northeastern Brazil possesses a set of wetlands characterized by hydrographic basins with deficient drainage networks, a few large and permanent lotic systems and several permanent and temporary lagoons. Aquatic plants are widely distributed in these wetlands and the present study aims to determine if those of Ceará state have similar species compositions and differences in species richness. We hypothesized that lentic ecosystems would have more species and different growth forms of aquatic angiosperms than lotic ecosystems. A total of 1619 records of aquatic angiosperms in 43 wetland areas were analysed. The most representative families were Cyperaceae, Poaceae, Fabaceae, Alismataceae, Malvaceae, Nymphaeaceae and Pontederiaceae. Most of the species are helophytes and bottom-rooted emergent hydrophytes. Permanent lentic ecosystems had the highest number of exclusive species (27.85 %), followed by temporary lentic ecosystems (20.54 %). Contrary to our hypothesis, the different aquatic ecosystems were found to possess distinct species compositions and different proportions of growth forms, and all wetland types contributed to the macrophyte richness of the study area, although they differ in species richness. Therefore, conservation plans for the native aquatic macrophyte biota should include all wetland ecosystems in the semiarid state of Ceará. Keywords: biodiversity, floristic richness, hydrophytes, macrophytes, seasonal aquatic ecosystems significantly during the rainy season according to the stage Introduction of flooding (Ferreira et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • RI Equisetopsida and Lycopodiopsida.Indd
    IIntroductionntroduction byby FFrancisrancis UnderwoodUnderwood Rhode Island Equisetopsida, Lycopodiopsida and Isoetopsida Special Th anks to the following for giving permission for the use their images. Robbin Moran New York Botanical Garden George Yatskievych and Ann Larson Missouri Botanical Garden Jan De Laet, plantsystematics.org Th is pdf is a companion publication to Rhode Island Equisetopsida, Lycopodiopsida & Isoetopsida at among-ri-wildfl owers.org Th e Elfi n Press 2016 Introduction Formerly known as fern allies, Horsetails, Club-mosses, Fir-mosses, Spike-mosses and Quillworts are plants that have an alternate generation life-cycle similar to ferns, having both sporophyte and gametophyte stages. Equisetopsida Horsetails date from the Devonian period (416 to 359 million years ago) in earth’s history where they were trees up to 110 feet in height and helped to form the coal deposits of the Carboniferous period. Only one genus has survived to modern times (Equisetum). Horsetails Horsetails (Equisetum) have jointed stems with whorls of thin narrow leaves. In the sporophyte stage, they have a sterile and fertile form. Th ey produce only one type of spore. While the gametophytes produced from the spores appear to be plentiful, the successful reproduction of the sporophyte form is low with most Horsetails reproducing vegetatively. Lycopodiopsida Lycopodiopsida includes the clubmosses (Dendrolycopodium, Diphasiastrum, Lycopodiella, Lycopodium , Spinulum) and Fir-mosses (Huperzia) Clubmosses Clubmosses are evergreen plants that produce only microspores that develop into a gametophyte capable of producing both sperm and egg cells. Club-mosses can produce the spores either in leaf axils or at the top of their stems. Th e spore capsules form in a cone-like structures (strobili) at the top of the plants.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytolacca Esculenta Van Houtte
    168 CONTENTS BOSABALIDIS ARTEMIOS MICHAEL – Glandular hairs, non-glandular hairs, and essential oils in the winter and summer leaves of the seasonally dimorphic Thymus sibthorpii (Lamiaceae) .................................................................................................. 3 SHARAWY SHERIF MOHAMED – Floral anatomy of Alpinia speciosa and Hedychium coronarium (Zingiberaceae) with particular reference to the nature of labellum and epigynous glands ........................................................................................................... 13 PRAMOD SIVAN, KARUMANCHI SAMBASIVA RAO – Effect of 2,6- dichlorobenzonitrile (DCB) on secondary wall deposition and lignification in the stem of Hibiscus cannabinus L.................................................................................. 25 IFRIM CAMELIA – Contributions to the seeds’ study of some species of the Plantago L. genus ..................................................................................................................................... 35 VENUGOPAL NAGULAN, AHUJA PREETI, LALCHHANHIMI – A unique type of endosperm in Panax wangianus S. C. Sun .................................................................... 45 JAIME A. TEIXEIRA DA SILVA – In vitro rhizogenesis in Papaya (Carica papaya L.) ....... 51 KATHIRESAN KANDASAMY, RAVINDER SINGH CHINNAPPAN – Preliminary conservation effort on Rhizophora annamalayana Kathir., the only endemic mangrove to India, through in vitro method ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Vascular Plant Surveys in the Polletts Cove and Lahave River Areas of Nova Scotia
    Rare Vascular Plant Surveys in the Polletts Cove and LaHave River areas of Nova Scotia David Mazerolle, Sean Blaney and Alain Belliveau Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre November 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was funded by the Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources, through their Species at Risk Conservation Fund. The Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre appreciates the opportunity provided by the fund to have visited these botanically significant areas. We also thank Sean Basquill for mapping, fieldwork and good company on our Polletts Cove trip, and Cape Breton Highlands National Park for assistance with vehicle transportation at the start of that trip. PHOTOGRAPHY CREDITS All photographs included in this report were taken by the authors. 1 INTRODUCTION This project, funded by the Nova Scotia Species at Risk Conservation Fund, focused on two areas of high potential for rare plant occurrence: 1) the Polletts Cove and Blair River system in northern Cape Breton, covered over eight AC CDC botanist field days; and 2) the lower, non-tidal 29 km and selected tidal portions of the LaHave River in Lunenburg County, covered over 12 AC CDC botanist field days. The Cape Breton Highlands support a diverse array of provincially rare plants, many with Arctic or western affinity, on cliffs, river shores, and mature deciduous forests in the deep ravines (especially those with more calcareous bedrock and/or soil) and on the peatlands and barrens of the highland plateau. Recent AC CDC fieldwork on Lockhart Brook, Big Southwest Brook and the North Aspy River sites similar to the Polletts Cove and Blair River valley was very successful, documenting 477 records of 52 provincially rare plant species in only five days of fieldwork.
    [Show full text]
  • Tamarack (Larix Laricina) by Joyce Tuharsky
    Natives to Know: Tamarack (Larix Laricina) By Joyce Tuharsky One of our northernmost trees, the hardy Tamarack is a slender-trunked, conical tree that grows 50-75 feet tall. The needles are a bright blue-green and surprisingly soft. They grow in tight spirals around short knobby spurs along the twigs. Tamaracks are among the few conifers that lose their needles in autumn. Just before the needles drop, the needles turn a beautiful golden-yellow. Tamarack cones are egg-shaped and among the smallest: less than an inch long. The bark is tight and flaky. Under this flaking bark, the wood appears reddish, giving the tree an interesting appearance even without needles. Very cold tolerant, Tamaracks are able to survive temperatures down to −85 °F. They are commonly found at the arctic tree line where it grows as a shrub. In more southerly locations, Tamaracks are normally found in wet soils in swamps, bogs and along lake edges. They are among the first trees to invade filled-lake bogs and are fairly well adapted to reproduce after a fire. However, because of its thin bark and shallow root system, the tree itself does not stand up well to fire. Also, the seedlings do not establish well in shade. Consequently, other more shade tolerant species eventually succeed Tamaracks. Tamaracks are native to much of Canada and south into the northeastern US from Minnesota to West Virginia. Because obits extensive range, the tree is known by many names: American Larch, Eastern Larch, Red Larch, and Hackmatack. The name “Tamarack” is Algonquian and means "wood used for snowshoes."Indeed, because Tamarack wood is very sturdy, yet flexible in thin strips, Native Americans used the wood and roots for many things: snowshoes, toboggans, sewing edges of canoes, and weaving twined bags.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Illinois Native Trees
    Technical Forestry Bulletin · NRES-102 Checklist of Illinois Native Trees Jay C. Hayek, Extension Forestry Specialist Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences Updated May 2019 This Technical Forestry Bulletin serves as a checklist of Tree species prevalence (Table 2), or commonness, and Illinois native trees, both angiosperms (hardwoods) and gym- county distribution generally follows Iverson et al. (1989) and nosperms (conifers). Nearly every species listed in the fol- Mohlenbrock (2002). Additional sources of data with respect lowing tables† attains tree-sized stature, which is generally to species prevalence and county distribution include Mohlen- defined as having a(i) single stem with a trunk diameter brock and Ladd (1978), INHS (2011), and USDA’s The Plant Da- greater than or equal to 3 inches, measured at 4.5 feet above tabase (2012). ground level, (ii) well-defined crown of foliage, and(iii) total vertical height greater than or equal to 13 feet (Little 1979). Table 2. Species prevalence (Source: Iverson et al. 1989). Based on currently accepted nomenclature and excluding most minor varieties and all nothospecies, or hybrids, there Common — widely distributed with high abundance. are approximately 184± known native trees and tree-sized Occasional — common in localized patches. shrubs found in Illinois (Table 1). Uncommon — localized distribution or sparse. Rare — rarely found and sparse. Nomenclature used throughout this bulletin follows the Integrated Taxonomic Information System —the ITIS data- Basic highlights of this tree checklist include the listing of 29 base utilizes real-time access to the most current and accept- native hawthorns (Crataegus), 21 native oaks (Quercus), 11 ed taxonomy based on scientific consensus.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Equisetum Giganteum</I>
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-24-2009 Ecophysiology and Biomechanics of Equisetum Giganteum in South America Chad Eric Husby Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI10022522 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Husby, Chad Eric, "Ecophysiology and Biomechanics of Equisetum Giganteum in South America" (2009). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 200. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/200 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida ECOPHYSIOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICS OF EQUISETUM GIGANTEUM IN SOUTH AMERICA A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in BIOLOGY by Chad Eric Husby 2009 To: Dean Kenneth Furton choose the name of dean of your college/school College of Arts and Sciences choose the name of your college/school This dissertation, written by Chad Eric Husby, and entitled Ecophysiology and Biomechanics of Equisetum Giganteum in South America, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. _______________________________________ Bradley C. Bennett _______________________________________ Jack B. Fisher _______________________________________ David W. Lee _______________________________________ Leonel Da Silveira Lobo O'Reilly Sternberg _______________________________________ Steven F. Oberbauer, Major Professor Date of Defense: March 24, 2009 The dissertation of Chad Eric Husby is approved.
    [Show full text]