The Bent Hawaiian-Emperor Hotspot Track: Inheriting the Mantle Wind REVIEW

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

REVIEW ity implies that velocity gradients are small and that inertial forces pale in comparison to viscous ones; thus, the mantle transmits stresses nearly The Bent Hawaiian-Emperor Hotspot instantaneously. Given both premises, any plate motion change must go along with changes in the internal mantle flow. Hager and O’Connell (6) Track: Inheriting the Mantle Wind used this insight to infer deep mantle motion from the surface plate tectonic pattern in the decade fol- John Tarduno,1,2* Hans-Peter Bunge,3 Norm Sleep,4 Ulrich Hansen5 lowing the first use of a hotspot reference frame. Subsequent advances in seismic tomography Bends in volcanic hotspot lineaments, best represented by the large elbow in the Hawaiian- and past plate motion modeling allowed model- Emperor chain, were thought to directly record changes in plate motion. Several lines of ing of the temporal evolution of the mantle back geophysical inquiry now suggest that a change in the locus of upwelling in the mantle induced by in time. Steinberger and O’Connell (7) produced mantle dynamics causes bends in hotspot tracks. Inverse modeling suggests that although deep a synoptic view of past mantle circulation that flow near the core-mantle boundary may have played a role in the Hawaiian-Emperor bend, suggested southward motion of the Hawaiian capture of a plume by a ridge, followed by changes in sub-Pacific mantle flow, can better explain hotspot, consistent with paleomagnetic data (8). the observations. Thus, hotspot tracks can reveal patterns of past mantle circulation. Geophysical cruise results and paleomagnetic studies resolved potential gaps in plate circuits he Hawaiian-Emperor track (Fig. 1) is the Two premises embedded in the dynamic [e.g., (9, 10)], and global paleomagnetic tests archetype used to illustrate plate motion equations of how the mantle moves preclude excluded polar wander (11–13). These develop- Tover a hotspot. In the classic view, volcan- stationary hotspots. The first is the principle of ments have set the stage for a reassessment of ism on the surface recorded regular plate motion mass conservation: Any plate movement at the mantle processes that could be recorded by large over a plume deep within Earth’smantlethat surface must be balanced by motion deeper in the bends in hotspot tracks. produced a fixed region of melting near the sur- mantle. The second premise is that the mantle can face (hotspot). The great bend separating the be taken as a highly viscous fluid—a nominal vis- An Alternative Hawaiian-Emperor Track on April 16, 2009 northwestern-trending Hawaiian chain from the cosity of 1021 Pa·s is suggested from studies of To visualize the implications of hotspot motion, north-south–oriented Emperor Seamounts was postglacial rebound (5). The large mantle viscos- we consider what the Hawaiian-Emperor track thought to trace a ~60°change in absolute plate motion. However, a paleomagnetic test based on 60° ocean drilling in 2001 revealed that the islands and seamounts had formed at different latitudes (1). The Emperor trend seamounts thus record motion of the upwelling in the mantle. Why didn’t the community accept hotspot www.sciencemag.org mobility earlier? The elegant and captivating ge- Emperor Seamounts ometry of the fixed hotspot idea (2) compelled a 50° search for alternatives to emerging contradictory Plate motion findings. It had been recognized in reconstructing 81 - 47 Ma plate motions that a fixed Hawaiian hotspot was inconsistent with fixed hotspots in the Indo- Atlantic realm (3). However, early reconstructions 40° relied on a critical plate circuit link through the Downloaded from then poorly understood Antarctic and southern- most Pacific region. The possibility of undocu- mented plate motions provided an option that Hawaiian Chain avoided hotspot drift. Paleomagnetic data from a 30° single Pacific site also indicated hotspot motion, but they could be interpreted as a record of polar Plate motion wander (4), the rotation of the entire solid Earth in response to shifts in its mass heterogeneities. In 20° 0 - 47 Ma addition, although plumes could easily have been envisioned as swaying in the mantle, the geo- dynamic details were wanting. 10° 1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA. 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, 0° USA. 3Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, München, 80333 München, 4 Germany. Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° Stanford, CA 94305, USA. 5Institut für Geophysik, Universität Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany. Fig. 1. Bathymetry of the northwest Pacific Ocean basin. The traditional interpretation is highlighted: The *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Hawaiian volcanic chain records absolute Pacific plate motion to the northwest, whereas the Emperor [email protected] Seamounts reflect a more northerly plate direction. 50 3 APRIL 2009 VOL 324 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org REVIEW might have looked like had the A C Hawaii hotspot actually been fixed 150° 170° 190° 210° 150° 170° 190° 210° relative to the deep mantle. To do this, we use plate circuits and assume that volcanic chains in the Indo-Atlantic realm reflect fixed hotspots. These Detroit 75-81 Ma predictions are thus still not free of 50° 50° the fixed hotspot hypothesis, but Suiko 61 Ma paleomagnetic studies suggest that Rapid Nintoku 56 Ma iii ii the hotspots in the Indo-Atlantic have hotspot i motion not moved much since the Late- Koko 49 Ma Cretaceous-Paleogene, when the Diakakuji 47 Ma Emperor Seamounts were formed 30° 30° Midway 28 Ma (14). The plate circuit that traverses the Necker 10 Ma Indo-Atlantic and Pacific realms via Hawaii Antarctica (9, 14) yields a hypotheti- cal trace that is similar to the Hawai- 10° 10° 160 180 ian chain for the last ~30 million years ° ° ° (Fig.2,AtoC).Foroldertimes,dif- B 200 D 150° 170° 190° 210° ferences build. The Hawaiian-Emperor 140 Lord bend of the extant track is replaced by Howe ° Pacific plate a gentle ~30° of curvature in the Rise -30 Australia hypothetical trace (Fig. 2D). This ° 50° moderate curvature is similar to that ° ° 220 seen in the Louisville chain, the other Campbellplateau -30 on April 16, 2009 hotspot track from the Pacific Ocean 120 basin with a long, clear age progres- ° sion (15) that is not confused by ° 240 lithospheric structure. Moreover, the 30° hypothetical trace resembles an oce- 100° AntarcticaWest anic fracture zone, a feature of Earth’s East 260° surface known to record plate motion Antarctica -60 340 320 300 16 ° ° ° over tens of millions of years ( ). As 60 ° ° ° 40 0 ° ° isthecasewithfracturezones,wecan ° 20 -60 10° www.sciencemag.org fit the trace with several small circle segments, the junction of each repre- 0.0 11.0 19.7 33.3 39.5 47.2 56.7 67.8 84.0 124.6 129.8 135.3 142.1 Seafloor Age (Ma) senting a change in plate motion. The bend in the actual track might repre- Fig. 2. Alternative Hawaiian-Emperor traces. (A) Present-day track with ages and episode of rapid hotspot motion sent one of these junction times in the highlighted. (B) Differences in how plate circuits connect the Indo-Atlantic realm to the Pacific for Late Cretaceous to hypothetical trace. middle Eocene times [from (14)]. In the standard reconstruction [e.g., (9)], the connection is through East-West Antarctica An alternative plate circuit in- (black arrows); in a more recent circuit, the connection is through Australia and the Lord Howe Rise (white arrows) (17). 14 19 volves transfer from Antarctica to (C) Predicted tracks from plate circuits [see ( )and( ) for ages and uncertainty analysis]: (i) East-West Antarctica circuit Downloaded from Australia, and then through Lord (red); (ii) Australia-Lord Howe Rise circuit (green); (iii) Australia-Lord Howe Rise circuit modified with a revised Antarctic- Howe Rise (Fig. 2, B and C). In the Australia spreading history [from (17)] (blue). Note that path (iii) converges to path (i). (D) Trace that would have been predictions arising from use of this produced had the Hawaiian hotspot been fixed in the deep mantle (16). Predictions based on East-West Antarctica circuit. circuit, a somewhat sharper bend remains, which could imply a larger plate motion change (17). Both plate circuits paleomagnetic determinations from ocean large volume flux (~350 m3 s−1)(21), spatial pass paleomagnetic consistency tests (14); we drilling (1, 8). pattern, and longevity are best explained by the cannot distinguish between them with the mantle plume hypothesis. Some studies of al- resolution of the available data. However, while Candidate Processes ternative mechanisms (e.g., a propagating crack) avoiding the Antarctic-Pacific connection, the Two models have been proposed to explain hot- show that they are inadequate (21), whereas other second circuit relies on a contentious assump- spots. One is a “top-down” plate-driven process in modeling has shown that deep mantle plumes tion: Lord Howe Rise is locked to the Campbell which rifting of the lithosphere stimulates shallow contribute substantially to the mantle energy bud- Plateau between 84 and 47 million years ago mantle melting (20). The second is a “bottom-up” get (22). Below, we identify five physical pro- (Ma). Moreover, when a revised history of model in which an upwelling or plume (2)risesin cesses that could have caused hotspot motion and Antarctic-Australian spreading history (18)is the mantle from a thermal boundary layer (the the Hawaiian-Emperor bend. We use 47 Ma as incorporated into the circuit through Lord Howe transition zone at ~700 km or as deep as the core- the best age for the bend; an older age of 50 Rise, the predictions for the locations of the mantle boundary).
Recommended publications
  • Geology of Hawaii Reefs

    Geology of Hawaii Reefs

    11 Geology of Hawaii Reefs Charles H. Fletcher, Chris Bochicchio, Chris L. Conger, Mary S. Engels, Eden J. Feirstein, Neil Frazer, Craig R. Glenn, Richard W. Grigg, Eric E. Grossman, Jodi N. Harney, Ebitari Isoun, Colin V. Murray-Wallace, John J. Rooney, Ken H. Rubin, Clark E. Sherman, and Sean Vitousek 11.1 Geologic Framework The eight main islands in the state: Hawaii, Maui, Kahoolawe , Lanai , Molokai , Oahu , Kauai , of the Hawaii Islands and Niihau , make up 99% of the land area of the Hawaii Archipelago. The remainder comprises 11.1.1 Introduction 124 small volcanic and carbonate islets offshore The Hawaii hot spot lies in the mantle under, or of the main islands, and to the northwest. Each just to the south of, the Big Island of Hawaii. Two main island is the top of one or more massive active subaerial volcanoes and one active submarine shield volcanoes (named after their long low pro- volcano reveal its productivity. Centrally located on file like a warriors shield) extending thousands of the Pacific Plate, the hot spot is the source of the meters to the seafloor below. Mauna Kea , on the Hawaii Island Archipelago and its northern arm, the island of Hawaii, stands 4,200 m above sea level Emperor Seamount Chain (Fig. 11.1). and 9,450 m from seafloor to summit, taller than This system of high volcanic islands and asso- any other mountain on Earth from base to peak. ciated reefs, banks, atolls, sandy shoals, and Mauna Loa , the “long” mountain, is the most seamounts spans over 30° of latitude across the massive single topographic feature on the planet.
  • Another Clue for Fast Motion of the Hawaiian Hotspot 27 February 2018

    Another Clue for Fast Motion of the Hawaiian Hotspot 27 February 2018

    Another clue for fast motion of the Hawaiian hotspot 27 February 2018 Northwest Pacific. But soon there was doubt over whether hotspots are truly stationary. The biggest contradiction was a striking bend of about 60 degrees in this volcanic chain, which originated 47 million years ago. "If you try to explain this bend with just a sudden change in the movement of the Pacific Plate, you would expect a significantly different direction of motion at that time relative to adjacent tectonic plates," says Bernhard Steinberger of the GFZ German Research Center for Geosciences. "But we have not found any evidence for that." Recent studies have suggested that apparently two processes were effective: On the one hand, the Pacific Plate has changed its direction of motion. On the other hand, the Hawaiian hotspot moved relatively quickly southward in the period from 60 to about 50 million years ago - and then stopped. If this hotspot motion is considered, only a smaller change of Pacific plate motions is needed to explain the volcano chain. Graph shows the dates of volcanoes of the three volcanic chains in the Pacific and their relative movement over time (left). The location of the three This hypothesis is now supported by work in which volcanic chains shown in the map (right). The stars mark Steinberger is also involved. First author Kevin the youngest end or the active volcanoes today. Credit: Konrad, Oregon State University in Corvallis, Nature Communications, Kevin Konrad et al. Oregon, and his team have evaluated new rock dating of volcanoes in the Rurutu volcanic chain, including, for example, the Tuvalu volcanic islands in the Western Pacific.
  • Hawaii Hotspot (Crustal Plate Movement)

    Hawaii Hotspot (Crustal Plate Movement)

    Earth Science Name: Dynamic Crust Laboratory # 13 Hawaii Hotspot (Crustal Plate Movement) Introduction: Plate tectonics has been an accepted theory since the 1960’s. According to this theory, the crust of the Earth is composed of plates that move over the asthenosphere. There are two basic types of plates: heavy, thin and dense oceanic plates, which are primarily composed of basalt; and thick, lighter continental plates, which are comprised of silicate rocks (granite). Movement of the Pacific plate over the Hawaiian Hot Spot: The idea behind plate tectonics is that the crustal plates are moving with respect to one another over geologic time. The rates of movement of crustal plates can be determined by using data from the plate margins along the mid-ocean ridges, or at regions known as “HOTSPOTS” where the distance and age can be measured. The Hawaiian Islands are volcanic islands that are produced as superheated molten material rises upward from deep within the mantle. As the molten material breaks through weak places in the crustal plate a new “island” will form. Hawaii Crustal Plate Lab.doc 10/6/2013 1 Procedures: 1. Using Map 1 on this page and the absolute dates of lava in bold black numbers that represent millions of years before the present. Calculate the age difference between the islands and enter the data in the table on page 3. When there is more than one age on an island use an average! 2. Make distance measurements between the “dots” of each circle using the scale on the diagram. 3. Convert the distance from kilometers to “land” or “real” centimeters (NOT cm on the map!) by multiplying the distance in KM by 100,000 (which is the number of cm in 1 km).
  • Hawaiian Hotspot

    Hawaiian Hotspot

    V51B-0546 (AGU Fall Meeting) High precision Pb, Sr, and Nd isotope geochemistry of alkalic early Kilauea magmas from the submarine Hilina bench region, and the nature of the Hilina/Kea mantle component J-I Kimura*, TW Sisson**, N Nakano*, ML Coombs**, PW Lipman** *Department of Geoscience, Shimane University **Volcano Hazard Team, USGS JAMSTEC Shinkai 6500 81 65 Emperor Seamounts 56 42 38 27 20 12 5 0 Ma Hawaii Islands Ready to go! Hawaiian Hotspot N ' 0 3 ° 9 Haleakala 1 Kea trend Kohala Loa 5t0r6 end Mauna Kea te eii 95 ol Hualalai Th l 504 na io sit Mauna Loa Kilauea an 509 Tr Papau 208 Hilina Seamont Loihi lic ka 209 Al 505 N 98 ' 207 0 0 508 ° 93 91 9 1 98 KAIKO 99 SHINKAI 02 KAIKO Loa-type tholeiite basalt 209 Transitional basalt 95 504 208 Alkalic basalt 91 508 0 50 km 155°00'W 154°30'W Fig. 1: Samples obtained by Shinkai 6500 and Kaiko dives in 1998-2002 10 T-Alk Mauna Kea 8 Kilauea Basanite Mauna Loa -K M Hilina (low-Si tholeiite) 6 Hilina (transitional) Hilina (alkali) Kea Hilina (basanite) 4 Loa Hilina (nephelinite) Papau (Loa type tholeiite) primary 2 Nep Basaltic Basalt andesite (a) 0 35 40 45 50 55 60 SiO2 Fig. 2: TAS classification and comparison of the early Kilauea lavas to representative lavas from Hawaii Big Island. Kea-type tholeiite through transitional, alkali, basanite to nephelinite lavas were collected from Hilina bench. Loa-type tholeiite from Papau seamount 100 (a) (b) (c) OIB OIB OIB M P / e l p 10 m a S E-MORB E-MORB E-MORB Loa type tholeiite Low Si tholeiite Transitional 1 f f r r r r r r r f d y r r d b b
  • Neon, Helium and Argon Isotope Systematics of the Hawaiian Hotspot

    Neon, Helium and Argon Isotope Systematics of the Hawaiian Hotspot

    Universität Potsdam Institut für Geowissenschaften Neon, Helium and Argon Isotope Systematics of the Hawaiian Hotspot Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades "doctor rerum naturalium" (Dr. rer. nat.) in der Wissenschaftsdisziplin Geowissenschaften eingereicht an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Potsdam von Tina Mailer, geb. Krüsmann Potsdam, Juni 2009 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License: Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 3.0 Germany To view a copy of this license visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/de/deed.en Published online at the Institutional Repository of the University of Potsdam: URL http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2009/3963/ URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-39633 http://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-39633 Fire and Ice Some say the world will end in fire, Some say in ice. From what I've tasted of desire I hold with those who favor fire. But if it had to perish twice, I think I know enough of hate To say that for destruction ice Is also great And would suffice. Robert Frost, 1923 Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Zusammmenfassung................................................................................................................... 2 Motivation and goals of this study ............................................................................................. 3 1 Noble Gas Geochemistry .......................................................................................................
  • Non-Hawaiian Lithostratigraphy of Louisville Seamounts and the Formation of High-Latitude Oceanic Islands and Guyots

    Non-Hawaiian Lithostratigraphy of Louisville Seamounts and the Formation of High-Latitude Oceanic Islands and Guyots

    Non-Hawaiian lithostratigraphy of Louisville seamounts and the formation of high-latitude oceanic islands and guyots David M. Buchsa,⁎, Rebecca Williamsb, Shin-ichi Sanoc, V. Paul Wrightd a Cardiff University, UK b University of Hull, UK c Fukui Prefectural Dinosaur Museum, Japan d National Museum of Wales, UK This is an author accepted manuscript for an article published in Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.12.019. ABSTRACT Guyots are large seamounts with a flat summit that is generally believed to form due to constructional biogenic and/or erosional processes during the formation of volcanic islands. However, despite their large abundance in the oceans, there are still very few direct constraints on the nature and formation of guyots, in particular those formed at high latitude that lack a thick cap of shallow-marine carbonate rocks. It is largely accepted based on geophysical constraints and surficial observations/sampling that the summit platform of these guyots is shaped by wave abrasion during post-volcanic subsidence of volcanic islands. Here we provide novel constraints on this hypothesis and the summit geology of guyots with a lithostratigraphic analysis of cores from three Louisville seamounts (South Pacific) collected during Expedition 330 of the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP). Thirteen lithofacies of sedimentary and volcanic deposits are described, which include facies not previously recognized on the top of guyots, and offer a new insight into the formation of high-latitude oceanic islands on a fast- moving plate. Our results reveal that the lithostratigraphy of Louisville seamounts preserves a very consistent record of the formation and drowning of volcanic islands, with from bottom to top: (i) volcaniclastic sequences with abundant lava-fed delta deposits, (ii) submarine to subaerial shield lava flows, (iii) post-volcanic shallow to deeper marine sedimentary rocks lacking thick reef deposits, (iv) post-erosional rejuvenated volcanic rocks, and (v) pelagic sediments.
  • Hawaii Hotspot

    Hawaii Hotspot

    Name ______________ Date _________ Per ______ Mini-Lesson 1) On which tectonic plate is the Hawaii hot spot? A) North American Plate B) African Plate C) Antarctic Plate D) Pacific Plate 2) Approximately what are the coordinates of the Hawaii Hot Spot? A) 50° N, 120° W C) 25° N, 158° W B) 25° N, 158° E D) 25° S, 158° E 3) The cross section below shows the direction of movement of an oceanic plate over a mantle hot spot, resulting in the formation of a chain of volcanoes labeled A, B, C, and D. The geologic age of volcano C is shown. What are the most likely geologic ages of volcanoes B and D? A) B is 5 million years old and D is 12 million years old. B) B is 2 million years old and D is 6 million years old. C) B is 9 million years old and D is 9 million years old. D) B is 10 million years old and D is 4 million years old. Page 1 4) Base your answer to the following question on the world map in your answer booklet and on your knowledge of Earth science. The map shows major earthquakes and volcanic activity occurring from 1996 through 2000. Letter A represents a volcano on a crustal plate boundary. The source of the magma for the volcanic activity in Hawaii is A) a magma plume originating in the mantle B) heat from the atmosphere C) radiation from nuclear facilities D) sedimentary rocks found on North America Page 2 5) Base your answer to the following question on the map and passage below.
  • Historical Shoreline Change in the Hawaiian Islands

    Historical Shoreline Change in the Hawaiian Islands

    National Assessment of Shoreline Change: Historical Shoreline Change in the Hawaiian Islands Open-File Report 2011–1051 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. View looking northwest of Makapuu Beach Park (foreground) and Waimanalo Bay in the distance, southeast Oahu, Hawaii. National Assessment of Shoreline Change: Historical Shoreline Change in the Hawaiian Islands By Charles H. Fletcher, Bradley M. Romine, Ayesha S. Genz, Matthew M. Barbee, Matthew Dyer, Tiffany R. Anderson, S. Chyn Lim, Sean Vitousek, Christopher Bochicchio, and Bruce M. Richmond Open-File Report 2011–1051 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Fletcher, C.H., Romine, B.M., Genz, A.S., Barbee, M.M., Dyer, Matthew, Anderson, T.R., Lim, S.C., Vitousek, Sean, Bochicchio, Christopher, and Richmond, B.M., 2012, National assessment of shoreline change: Historical shoreline change in the Hawaiian Islands: U.S.
  • The Hawaiian Archipelago: Isolated, Ancient, Continually Renewed

    The Hawaiian Archipelago: Isolated, Ancient, Continually Renewed

    Hawaii Statewide Assessment of Forest Conditions and Resource Strategy 2010 The Hawaiian Archipelago: Isolated, Ancient, Continually Renewed What we know today as the Hawaiian Archipelago actually consists of three distinct landforms all created by the same volcanic “hot spot”; an apparently stationary feature in the middle of the Pacific tectonic plate (See Figure 3). This hot spot pushes lava upwards from deep with in the earth’s crust and over time forms a mountain which eventually reaches the surface of the ocean, and continues to grow.Meanwhile, the Pacific plate slowly moves in a northwest direction away from the hot spot carrying the landmass with it. In conjunction with this lateral movement, the sea floor actually sinks as it moves away from the hot spot. Figure 1. Hawaii is the most The combination of this sinking tendency and the powerful isolated archipelago in the world. forces of erosion by wind, rain and sea begin to wear the Image courtesy of Google Earth. young island down. Thus, the youngest islands are those at the southeast portion of the island chain, and the islands get progressively older as one travels west. The process of creating new land from lava continues to this day. Kilauea volcano in Hawaii Volcanoes National Park has been continually erupting since 1983. Visitors to Kilauea are treated to a rare spectacle of molten lava pouring into the ocean. Kilauea lies on the eastern flank of another volcano, Mauna Loa, which rises to over 13,000 ft above sea level. When measured from the sea floor to the summit, Mauna Loa is the tallest mountain on the planet.
  • Niu, Y. the Origin of the 43 Ma Bend Along the Hawaii-Emperor Seamount Chain: Problem and Solution (Chapter 4), in Oceanic Hotspots, Edited by R

    Niu, Y. the Origin of the 43 Ma Bend Along the Hawaii-Emperor Seamount Chain: Problem and Solution (Chapter 4), in Oceanic Hotspots, Edited by R

    Niu, Y. The origin of the 43 Ma bend along the Hawaii-Emperor seamount chain: Problem and solution (Chapter 4), In Oceanic Hotspots, edited by R. Hékinian & P. Stoffers, Springer-Verlag, New York, p. 143-155, 2004 Chapter4 Origin of the 43 Ma Bend Along the Hawaiian-Emperor Seamount Chaln: Problem and Solution Y. Niu 4.1 Introduction The Hawaiian-Emperor Seamount chain (H-E SMC) on the Pacific Plate (Figs. 4.1 and 4.2a,b) is the best-defined hotspot track on the Earth. Ifhotspots are surface manifesta­ tions of deep, fixed sources of mantle plumes (Morgan 1971, 1981), then the along-track volcanic age progression away from Hawaii (e.g., Clague and Dalrymple 1989) must record the direction, absolute velocity, and possible changes of the Pacific Plate mo­ tion. This would suggest that the prominent -43 Ma Bend along the H-E SMCreflects a sudden change in Pacific Plate motion direction by -60°. However, the actual cause of the 43 Ma Bend is unknown. A leading hypothesis is that the collision between In­ dia and Eurasia some -45 Ma ago might have triggered the sudden reorientation of the Pacific Plate motion from northward to northwestward, hence the 43 Ma Bend (Dalrymple and Clauge 1976; Patriat andAchache 1984).This collision,however,is shown to have had no effect on the Pacific Plate motion (Lithgow-Bertelloni and Richards 1998). The lack of apparent mechanism for such a sudden change in Pacific Plate motion di­ rection led to the speculation (Norton 1995) that the -43 Ma Bend may have resulted from a southward drift of the Hawaiian hotspot prior to -43 Ma.
  • Unspiked K Ar Dating of the Honolulu Rejuvenated and Ko`Olau Shield

    Unspiked K Ar Dating of the Honolulu Rejuvenated and Ko`Olau Shield

    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 232 (2005) 1–11 www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Unspiked K–Ar dating of the Honolulu rejuvenated and Kodolau shield volcanism on Odahu, Hawaidi Ayako Ozawaa,T, Takahiro Tagamia, Michael O. Garciab aDivision of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan bDepartment of Geology and Geophysics, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA Received 16 September 2004; received in revised form 24 December 2004; accepted 18 January 2005 Editor: K. Farley Abstract Many mantle plume volcanoes undergo rejuvenated volcanism after a period of construction and erosion of their shield. The cause of this renewed volcanism has been enigmatic and various models have been proposed. However, the lack of geochronological data has hindered evaluation of these models. Unspiked K–Ar ages on groundmass in 41 samples from 32 vents of Honolulu Volcanics and eight samples of underlying Kodolau Volcanics were determined in order to reveal the temporal distribution of rejuvenated vents and the length of the hiatus between the end of shield and start of rejuvenated volcanism. The new geochronological results show that Kodolau shield volcanism ended at 2.1 Ma and that rejuvenated volcanism started at 0.8 Ma, resulting in a 1.3 million year hiatus in volcanic activity. Two distinct pulses were found for Honolulu volcanism at 0.80– 0.35 and ~0.1 Ma. During the first pulse, the eruption frequency increased with time and there was no spatial pattern in vent distribution, although three vents along a NNE–SSW trend produced similar compositions and may have been coeval.
  • Article Guide: Hawaii's Hotspot Heats Up: What the Recent Volcanic

    Article Guide: Hawaii's Hotspot Heats Up: What the Recent Volcanic

    Article Guide: Hawaii’s Hotspot Heats Up: What the recent Volcanic Activity on Kilauea means for the rest of the islands http://scienceovereverything.com/2018/05/29/hawaii-hotspot/ Part 1: What’s a hotspot? Directions: • Read the section of the article titled “What’s a hotspot?” o Box vocabulary words or words that you have not seen before o Underline in the text where the focus questions are addressed • Answer each focus question Focus questions 1. What causes hotspot volcanoes to form? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ 2. How do hotspots create chains of volcanic islands? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ 3. How can we find the relative age of each of the Hawaiian islands? __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ Part 2: So what’s causing all these eruptions? Directions: • Read each understanding question o Think about what you would need to know to answer that question • Read the section of the article titled “So what’s causing all these eruptions?”. o Box vocabulary words or words that you have not seen before • Answer each understanding question Understanding questions 1. Titlemeters show changes in the