DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft ICH Guideline M10 on Bioanalytical Method Validation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft ICH Guideline M10 on Bioanalytical Method Validation 1 13 March 2019 2 EMA/CHMP/ICH/172948/2019 3 Committee for Human Medicinal Products 4 ICH guideline M10 on bioanalytical method validation 5 Step 2b Transmission to CHMP 28 February 2019 Adoption by CHMP 28 February 2019 Release for public consultation 14 March 2019 Deadline for comments 1 September 2019 6 7 Comments should be provided using this template. The completed comments form should be sent to [email protected] 8 30 Churchill Place ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 5EU ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 3660 6000 Facsimile +44 (0)20 3660 5505 Send a question via our website www.ema.europa.eu/contact An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2019. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 9 10 11 12 13 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL 14 REQUIREMENTS FOR PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE 15 16 17 ICH HARMONISED GUIDELINE 18 19 20 BIOANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION 21 M10 22 23 24 Draft version 25 26 Currently under public consultation 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 At Step 2 of the ICH Process, a consensus draft text or guideline, agreed by the appropriate ICH Expert Working 46 Group, is transmitted by the ICH Assembly to the regulatory authorities of the ICH regions for internal and external 47 consultation, according to national or regional procedures. 48 49 50 51 M10 52 Document History 53 Code History Date M10 Endorsement by the Members of the ICH Assembly under Step 2 and release for public consultation ( 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 Legal notice: This document is protected by copyright and may, with the exception of the ICH logo, be 81 used, reproduced, incorporated into other works, adapted, modified, translated or distributed under a 82 public license provided that ICH's copyright in the document is acknowledged at all times. In case of any 83 adaption, modification or translation of the document, reasonable steps must be taken to clearly label, 84 demarcate or otherwise identify that changes were made to or based on the original document. Any 85 impression that the adaption, modification or translation of the original document is endorsed or 86 sponsored by the ICH must be avoided. 87 The document is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. In no event shall the ICH or the authors 88 of the original document be liable for any claim, damages or other liability arising from the use of the 89 document. 90 The above-mentioned permissions do not apply to content supplied by third parties. Therefore, for 91 documents where the copyright vests in a third party, permission for reproduction must be obtained from 92 this copyright holder. 93 94 ICH HARMONISED GUIDELINE 95 BIOANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION 96 M10 97 ICH Consensus Guideline 98 TABLE OF CONTENTS 99 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 4 100 1.1 Objective ............................................................................................................. 4 101 1.2 Background .......................................................................................................... 4 102 1.3 Scope .................................................................................................................. 4 103 2. GENERAL PRINCIPLES ............................................................................. 5 104 2.1 Method Development ............................................................................................. 5 105 2.2 Method Validation ................................................................................................. 6 106 2.2.1 Full Validation ................................................................................................. 6 107 2.2.2 Partial Validation ................................................................................................ 7 108 2.2.3 Cross Validation ................................................................................................. 7 109 3. CHROMATOGRAPHY ................................................................................. 7 110 3.1 Reference Standards ............................................................................................. 7 111 3.2 Validation............................................................................................................. 8 112 3.2.1 Selectivity ......................................................................................................... 8 113 3.2.2 Specificity ......................................................................................................... 9 114 3.2.3 Matrix Effect .................................................................................................... 10 115 3.2.4 Calibration Curve and Range.............................................................................. 10 116 3.2.5 Accuracy and Precision ...................................................................................... 11 117 3.2.5.1 Preparation of Quality Control Samples ............................................................ 11 118 3.2.5.2 Evaluation of Accuracy and Precision ................................................................ 12 119 3.2.6 Carry-over ...................................................................................................... 12 120 3.2.7 Dilution Integrity .............................................................................................. 13 121 3.2.8 Stability .......................................................................................................... 13 ICH M10 Guideline 122 3.2.9 Reinjection Reproducibility ................................................................................ 16 123 3.3 Study Sample Analysis ........................................................................................ 16 124 3.3.1 Analytical Run .................................................................................................. 16 125 3.3.2 Acceptance Criteria for an Analytical Run ............................................................ 17 126 3.3.3 Calibration Range ............................................................................................. 18 127 3.3.4 Reanalysis of Study Samples ............................................................................. 19 128 3.3.5 Reinjection of Study Samples ............................................................................ 20 129 3.3.6 Integration of Chromatograms ........................................................................... 20 130 4. LIGAND BINDING ASSAYS ..................................................................... 21 131 4.1 Key Reagents ..................................................................................................... 21 132 4.1.1 Reference Standard .......................................................................................... 21 133 4.1.2 Critical Reagents .............................................................................................. 21 134 4.2 Validation........................................................................................................... 22 135 4.2.1 Specificity ....................................................................................................... 22 136 4.2.2 Selectivity ....................................................................................................... 23 137 4.2.3 Calibration Curve and Range.............................................................................. 23 138 4.2.4 Accuracy and Precision ...................................................................................... 24 139 4.2.4.1 Preparation of Quality Control Samples ............................................................ 24 140 4.2.4.2 Evaluation of Accuracy and Precision ................................................................ 24 141 4.2.5 Carry-over ...................................................................................................... 25 142 4.2.6 Dilution Linearity and Hook Effect ....................................................................... 25 143 4.2.7 Stability .......................................................................................................... 26 144 4.3 Study Sample Analysis ........................................................................................ 27 145 4.3.1 Analytical Run .................................................................................................. 27 146 4.3.2 Acceptance Criteria for an Analytical Run ............................................................ 27 147 4.3.3 Calibration Range ............................................................................................. 28 148 4.3.4 Reanalysis of Study Samples ............................................................................. 29 149 150 5. INCURRED SAMPLE REANALYSIS .......................................................... 30 151 6. PARTIAL AND CROSS VALIDATION ........................................................ 31 152 6.1 Partial Validation ................................................................................................. 31 153 6.2 Cross Validation .................................................................................................. 33 2 ICH M10 Guideline 154 7. ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................ 33 155 7.1 Analytes that are also Endogenous
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Validation of Rapid Enzymatic Quantification of Acetic Acid In
    foods Article Validation of Rapid Enzymatic Quantification of Acetic Acid in Vinegar on Automated Spectrophotometric System Irene Dini 1,* , Ritamaria Di Lorenzo 1, Antonello Senatore 2, Daniele Coppola 2 and Sonia Laneri 1 1 Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, Via Domenico Montesano 49, 80131 Napoli, Italy; [email protected] (R.D.L.); [email protected] (S.L.) 2 Lcm Laboratory for Product Analysis of Chamber of Commerce, Corso Meridionale, 80143 Napoli, Italy; [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (D.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 May 2020; Accepted: 4 June 2020; Published: 9 June 2020 Abstract: Vinegar is produced from the fermentation of agricultural materials and diluted acetic acid (diluted with water to 4–30% by volume) via sequential ethanol and acetic acid fermentation. The concentration of acetic acid must be measured during vinegar production. A Community method for analyzing acetic acid in vinegar is a non-specific method based on the assumption that the total acid concentration of the vinegar is attributable to the acetic acid. It consists of titration with a strong base in the presence of an indicator. This test is laborious and has a time-consuming character. In this work, a highly specific automated enzymatic method was validated, for the first time, to quantify the acetic acid in the wine vinegar, in terms of linearity, precision, repeatability, and uncertainty measurement. The results were compared to the Community method of analysis. Regression coefficient 1 and the normal distribution of residuals in the ANOVA test confirmed the method’s linearity.
    [Show full text]
  • Raman Spectroscopic Characterization and Analysis of Agricultural and Biological Systems Qi Wang Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2013 Raman spectroscopic characterization and analysis of agricultural and biological systems Qi Wang Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Agriculture Commons, Biomedical Commons, Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Commons, and the Biostatistics Commons Recommended Citation Wang, Qi, "Raman spectroscopic characterization and analysis of agricultural and biological systems" (2013). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 13019. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/13019 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Raman spectroscopic characterization and analysis of agricultural and biological systems by Qi Wang A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Agricultural Engineering Program of Study Committee: Chenxu Yu, Major Professor Jacek Adam Koziel Kenneth J Koehler Lie Tang Sinisa Grozdanic Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2013 Copyright © Qi Wang, 2013. All rights reserved. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES………………………………………………………………………………...…..v LIST OF TABLES.................................................................................................................................vi
    [Show full text]
  • Analytical Chemistry in the 21St Century: Challenges, Solutions, and Future Perspectives of Complex Matrices Quantitative Analyses in Biological/Clinical Field
    Review Analytical Chemistry in the 21st Century: Challenges, Solutions, and Future Perspectives of Complex Matrices Quantitative Analyses in Biological/Clinical Field 1, 2, 2, 3 Giuseppe Maria Merone y, Angela Tartaglia y, Marcello Locatelli * , Cristian D’Ovidio , Enrica Rosato 3, Ugo de Grazia 4 , Francesco Santavenere 5, Sandra Rossi 5 and Fabio Savini 5 1 Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University of Chieti–Pescara “G. d’Annunzio”, Via dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Pharmacy, University of Chieti-Pescara “G. d’Annunzio”, Via Dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti (CH), Italy; [email protected] 3 Section of Legal Medicine, Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, University of Chieti–Pescara “G. d’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy; [email protected] (C.D.); [email protected] (E.R.) 4 Laboratory of Neurological Biochemistry and Neuropharmacology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133 Milano, Italy; [email protected] 5 Pharmatoxicology Laboratory—Hospital “Santo Spirito”, Via Fonte Romana 8, 65124 Pescara, Italy; [email protected] (F.S.); [email protected] (S.R.); [email protected] (F.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0871-3554590; Fax: +39-0871-3554911 These authors contributed equally to the work. y Received: 16 September 2020; Accepted: 16 October 2020; Published: 30 October 2020 Abstract: Nowadays, the challenges in analytical chemistry, and mostly in quantitative analysis, include the development and validation of new materials, strategies and procedures to meet the growing need for rapid, sensitive, selective and green methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Bioanalysis and Diagnosis
    Showcasing the Surface-enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) technique for Bioanalysis and Diagnosis As featured in: applications by a group of researchers led by Prof Liwu Volume 13 Number 27 21 July 2021 Zhang from Fudan University and Prof Ventsislav Valev Pages 11581-12046 from the University of Bath. Nanoscale rsc.li/nanoscale Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for bioanalysis and diagnosis SERS is an eff ective analytical technique that has excellent potential in bioanalysis and diagnosis as demonstrated by its increasing applications in vivo . SERS fi nds a broad range of applications with clinical relevance, such as biological ISSN 2040-3372 PAPER Shifeng Zhao et al. The sign reversal of anomalous Hall eff ect derived from the transformation of scattering eff ect in cluster-assembled sensing, drug delivery, single cell assays, early stage cancer Ni 0.8 Fe 0.2 nanostructural fi lms screening and fast detection of pathogens. We present a comprehensive survey of SERS-based assays, from basic See Nicoleta E. Dina , Ventsislav K. considerations to bioanalytical applications. Valev, Liwu Zhang et al. , Nanoscale , 2021, 13 , 11593. rsc.li/nanoscale Registered charity number: 207890 Nanoscale View Article Online REVIEW View Journal | View Issue Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for bioanalysis and diagnosis Cite this: Nanoscale, 2021, 13, 11593 Muhammad Ali Tahir,†a Nicoleta E. Dina, *†b Hanyun Cheng,a Ventsislav K. Valev *c and Liwu Zhang *a,d In recent years, bioanalytical surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) has blossomed into a fast- growing research area. Owing to its high sensitivity and outstanding multiplexing ability, SERS is an effective analytical technique that has excellent potential in bioanalysis and diagnosis, as demonstrated by its increasing applications in vivo.
    [Show full text]
  • Standardizing Analytical Methods
    Chapter 5 Standardizing Analytical Methods Chapter Overview 5A Analytical Standards 5B Calibrating the Signal (Stotal) 5C Determining the Sensitivity (kA) 5D Linear Regression and Calibration Curves 5E Compensating for the Reagent Blank (Sreag) 5F Using Excel and R for a Regression Analysis 5G Key Terms 5H Chapter Summary 5I Problems 5J Solutions to Practice Exercises The American Chemical Society’s Committee on Environmental Improvement defines standardization as the process of determining the relationship between the signal and the amount of analyte in a sample.1 In Chapter 3 we defined this relationship as SktotalA=+nSA reagtor Skotal = AAC where Stotal is the signal, nA is the moles of analyte, CA is the analyte’s concentration, kA is the method’s sensitivity for the analyte, and Sreag is the contribution to Stotal from sources other than the sample. To standardize a method we must determine values for kA and Sreag. Strategies for accomplishing this are the subject of this chapter. 1 ACS Committee on Environmental Improvement “Guidelines for Data Acquisition and Data Quality Evaluation in Environmental Chemistry,” Anal. Chem. 1980, 52, 2242–2249. 147 148 Analytical Chemistry 2.1 5A Analytical Standards To standardize an analytical method we use standards that contain known amounts of analyte. The accuracy of a standardization, therefore, depends on the quality of the reagents and the glassware we use to prepare these standards. For example, in an acid–base titration the stoichiometry of the acid–base reaction defines the relationship between the moles of analyte and the moles of titrant. In turn, the moles of titrant is the product of the See Chapter 9 for a thorough discussion of titrant’s concentration and the volume of titrant used to reach the equiva- titrimetric methods of analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Bioanalysis
    Drug Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Bioanalysis Edited by Hye Suk Lee and Kwang-Hyeon Liu Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Pharmaceutics www.mdpi.com/journal/pharmaceutics Drug Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Bioanalysis Drug Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Bioanalysis Special Issue Editors Hye Suk Lee Kwang-Hyeon Liu MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade Special Issue Editors Hye Suk Lee Kwang-Hyeon Liu The Catholic University of Korea Kyungpook National University Korea Korea Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Pharmaceutics (ISSN 1999-4923) in 2018 (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ pharmaceutics/special issues/dmpk and bioanalysis) For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03897-916-6 (Pbk) ISBN 978-3-03897-917-3 (PDF) c 2019 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. Contents About the Special Issue Editors ..................................... vii Preface to ”Drug Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Bioanalysis” ................. ix Fakhrossadat Emami, Alireza Vatanara, Eun Ji Park and Dong Hee Na Drying Technologies for the Stability and Bioavailability of Biopharmaceuticals Reprinted from: Pharmaceutics 2018, 10, 131, doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics10030131 ........
    [Show full text]
  • Viewed, Most SPME Extractions Are Performed in Aqueous Matrices.11,16 the Organic Solvent Most Likely Acted As an Interference with the Analyte Extraction
    A COMPARISON OF COMMON LABORATORY TECHNIQUES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THIOCARBAMATE PESTICIDES A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Tammy Schumacher Donohue August, 2012 A COMPARISON OF COMMON LABORATORY TECHNIQUES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THIOCARBAMATE PESTICIDES Tammy Schumacher Donohue Thesis Approved: Accepted: ________________________________ ________________________________ Advisor Dean of the College Dr. Claire Tessier Dr. Chand Midha ________________________________ ________________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Kim C. Calvo Dr. George R. Newkome ________________________________ ________________________________ Department Chair Date Dr. Kim C. Calvo ii ABSTRACT The United States Environmental Protection Agency has devised a set of regulations limiting the use of thiocarbamate pesticides for the health and safety of humans and the environment. These regulations dictate the maximum amount of thiocarbamate compounds that may be released or present in soil, waste, and groundwater. Therefore, it is important to be able to determine their concentration accurately and reproducibly. A study was conducted to determine the best way to identify and quantify six thiocarbamate herbicides using equipment commonly found in industrial laboratories. Three analytical methods were tested: gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, high performance liquid chromatography, and infrared spectroscopy. They were chosen for their common usage, broad application, and operative ability. A comparison of these methods was made to determine the most effective technique for thiocarbamate identification and quantification. iii DEDICATION To my husband, Chris, whose steadfast belief in me never wavered. Thank you for always letting me know you were behind me, no matter what. I love you.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for the Validation of Analytical Methodology and Calibration of Equipment Used for Testing of Illicit Drugs in Seized Materials and Biological Specimens
    Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel.: (+43-1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org Guidance for the Validation of Analytical Methodology and Calibration of Equipment used for Testing of Illicit Drugs in Seized Materials and Biological Specimens FOR UNITED NATIONS USE ONLY United Nations publication ISBN 978-92-1-148243-0 Sales No. E.09.XI.16 *0984578*Printed in Austria ST/NAR/41 V.09-84578—October 2009—200 A commitment to quality and continuous improvement Photo credits: UNODC Photo Library Laboratory and Scientific Section UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Guidance for the Validation of Analytical Methodology and Calibration of Equipment used for Testing of Illicit Drugs in Seized Materials and Biological Specimens A commitment to quality and continuous improvement UNITED NATIONS New York, 2009 Acknowledgements This manual was produced by the Laboratory and Scientific Section (LSS) of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and its preparation was coor- dinated by Iphigenia Naidis and Satu Turpeinen, staff of UNODC LSS (headed by Justice Tettey). LSS wishes to express its appreciation and thanks to the members of the Standing Panel of the UNODC’s International Quality Assurance Programme, Dr. Robert Anderson, Dr. Robert Bramley, Dr. David Clarke, and Dr. Pirjo Lillsunde, for the conceptualization of this manual, their valuable contributions, the review and finali- zation of the document.* *Contact details of named individuals can be requested from the UNODC Laboratory and Scientific Section (P.O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria). ST/NAR/41 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No.
    [Show full text]
  • Limit of Detection for Calibration Methods
    Limit of detection for calibration methods MARÍA JOSÉ RODRÍGUEZ CUESTA Doctoral Thesis ROVIRA I VIRGILI UNIVERSITY Tarragona 2006 UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI LIMIT OF DETECTION FOR SECOND-ORDER CALIBRATION METHODS. M. José Rodríguez Cuesta ISBN: 978-84-690-7787-0 / DL: T.1349-2007 UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI LIMIT OF DETECTION FOR SECOND-ORDER CALIBRATION METHODS. M. José Rodríguez Cuesta ISBN: 978-84-690-7787-0 / DL: T.1349-2007 Limit of detection for second-order calibration methods Doctoral thesis ROVIRA I VIRGILI UNIVERSITY UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI LIMIT OF DETECTION FOR SECOND-ORDER CALIBRATION METHODS. M. José Rodríguez Cuesta ISBN: 978-84-690-7787-0 / DL: T.1349-2007 UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI LIMIT OF DETECTION FOR SECOND-ORDER CALIBRATION METHODS. M. José Rodríguez Cuesta ISBN: 978-84-690-7787-0 / DL: T.1349-2007 Rovira i Virgili University Department of Analytical Chemistry and Organic Chemistry Limit of detection for second-order calibration methods Dissertation presented by María José Rodríguez Cuesta to receive the degree Doctor of the Rovira i Virgili University European PhD Tarragona, 2006 Supervisor Dr. Ricard Boqué i Martí UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI LIMIT OF DETECTION FOR SECOND-ORDER CALIBRATION METHODS. M. José Rodríguez Cuesta ISBN: 978-84-690-7787-0 / DL: T.1349-2007 UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI LIMIT OF DETECTION FOR SECOND-ORDER CALIBRATION METHODS. M. José Rodríguez Cuesta ISBN: 978-84-690-7787-0 / DL: T.1349-2007 ROVIRA I VIRGILI UNIVERSITY Department of Analytical Chemistry and Organic Chemistry Dr
    [Show full text]
  • Bioanalytical Method Validation and Its Pharmaceutical Application
    A tica nal eu yt c ic a a m A r a c t Sonawane et al., Pharm Anal Acta 2014, 5:3 h a P DOI: 10.4172/2153-2435.1000288 ISSN: 2153-2435 Pharmaceutica Analytica Acta Review Article Open Access Bioanalytical Method Validation and Its Pharmaceutical Application- A Review Lalit V Sonawane*, Bhagwat N Poul, Sharad V Usnale, Pradeepkumar V Waghmare and Laxman H Surwase Department of Quality Assurance, MSS’s Maharashtra College of Pharmacy, Nilanga, Maharashtra, India Abstract Bioanalytical methods, based on a variety of physico-chemical and biological techniques such as chromatography, immunoassay and mass spectrometry, must be validated prior to and during use to give confidence in the results generated. It is the process used to establish that a quantitative analytical method is suitable for biomedical applications. Bioanalytical method validation includes all of the procedures that demonstrate that a particular method used for quantitative measurement of analytes in a given biological matrix, such as blood, plasma, serum, or urine is reliable and reproducible for the intended use. The present manuscript focuses on the consistent evaluation of the key bioanalytical validation parameters is discussed: accuracy, precision, sensitivity, selectivity, standard curve, limits of quantification, range, recovery and stability. These validation parameters are described, together with an example of validation methodology applied in the case of chromatographic methods used in bioanalysis, taking in account to the recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines and EMA guidelines. Keywords: Bioanalytical method validation; Validation parameters; Bioanalytical method validation is vital not only in terms of Application; FDA and EMA guidelines regulatory submission but also for ensuring generation of high quality data during drug discovery and development.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioanalysis Zone
    Powered by Bioanalysis TOP ARTICLE SUPPLEMENT CONTENTS REVIEW: Immunogenicity and PK/PD evaluation in biotherapeutic drug development: scientific considerations for bioanalytical methods and data analysis Bioanalysis Vol. 6 Issue 1 RESEARCH ARTICLE: An ultrasensitive method for the quantitation of active and inactive GLP-1 in human plasma via immunoaffinity LC-MS/MS Bioanalysis Vol. 6 Issue 1 REVIEW: Analytical protocols based on LC–MS, GC–MS and CE–MS for nontargeted metabolomics of biological tissues Bioanalysis Vol. 6 Issue 12 REVIEW Immunogenicity and PK/PD evaluation in biotherapeutic drug development: scientific considerations for bioanalytical methods and data ana lysis With the advent of novel technologies, considerable advances have been made in the evaluation of the relationship between PK and PD. Ligand-binding assays have been the primary assay format supporting PK and immunogenicity assessments. Critical and in-depth characterizations of the ligand-binding assay of interest can provide valuable understanding of the limitations, for interpreting PK/PD and immunogenicity results. This review illustrates key challenges with regard to understanding the relationship between anti-drug antibody and PK/PD, including confounding factors associated with the development and validation of ligand-binding assays, mechanisms by which anti-drug antibody impacts PK/PD, factors to consider during data analyses and interpretation, and a perspective on integrating immunogenicity data into the well-established quantitative modeling approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Method 6800: Elemental and Molecular Speciated Isotope
    METHOD 6800 ELEMENTAL AND MOLECULAR SPECIATED ISOTOPE DILUTION MASS SPECTROMETRY SW-846 is not intended to be an analytical training manual. Therefore, method procedures are written based on the assumption that they will be performed by analysts who are formally trained in at least the basic principles of chemical analysis and in the use of the subject technology. In addition, SW-846 methods, with the exception of required method use for the analysis of method-defined parameters, are intended to be guidance methods which contain general information on how to perform an analytical procedure or technique which a laboratory can use as a basic starting point for generating its own detailed standard operating procedure (SOP), either for its own general use or for a specific project application. The performance data included in this method are for guidance purposes only, and are not intended to be and must not be used as absolute quality control (QC) acceptance criteria for purposes of laboratory accreditation. 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION For a summary of changes in this version from the previously published draft method 6800, February 2007 Rev 0, please see Appendix A at the end of this document. 1.1 This method consists of two approaches: (1) isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) for the determination of the total concentrations of elements and molecules and (2) molecular speciated isotope dilution mass spectrometry (SIDMS) for the determination of elemental and molecular species. IUPAC defines speciation analysis as “analyzing chemical compounds that differ in isotopic composition, conformation, oxidation or electronic state, or in the nature of their complexed or covalently bound substituents, which can be regarded as distinct chemical species.” This method is applicable to the determination of total elements as well as elemental species and molecular species at parts per billion (ppb), parts per trillion (ppt) and sub-ppt levels in samples of various types; in waters, solids, blood, foods or in extracts or digests.
    [Show full text]