<<

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 3227

8. Executive Order 13211: Actions That List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271 ADDRESSES: Comprehensive information Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Environmental protection, on the Site, as well as the comments Distribution, or Use Administrative practice and procedure, that were received during the comment This rule is not subject to Executive Confidential business information, period are available at: Stuart Hill, Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, Hazardous materials transportation, Community Involvement Coordinator, 2001), because it is not a significant Hazardous waste, Indians-lands, U.S. EPA , P19J, 77 W. Jackson, , regulatory action as defined in Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, IL, (312) 886–0684 or 1–800–621–8431. Executive Order 12866. Reporting and recordkeeping FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: requirements. Gladys Beard, State NPL Deletion 9. National Technology Transfer Process Manager, U.S. EPA (SR–6J), 77 Advancement Act Authority: This action is issued under the authority of sections 2002(a), 3006 and W. Jackson, Chicago, IL 60604, (312) EPA approves State programs as long 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as 886–7253 or 1–800–621-8431. as they meet criteria required by RCRA, amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b). Information Repositories: Repositories so it would be inconsistent with Dated: December 23, 2005. have been established to provide applicable law for EPA, in its review of detailed information concerning this Gulezian, a State program, to require the use of decision at the following address: U.S. any particular voluntary consensus Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. EPA Region V Library, 77 W. Jackson, standard in place of another standard [FR Doc. 06–530 Filed 1–19–06; 8:45 am] Chicago, IL 60604, (312) 353–5821, that meets requirements of RCRA. Thus, BILLING CODE 6550–50–P Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.; the requirements of section 12(d) of the Mancelona Public Library, 202 W. State National Technology Transfer and Street, Mancelona, MI 49945, (231) 587– ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 9451, Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to AGENCY 272 note) do not apply to this rule. 4 p.m., Tuesday and Thursday 6 p.m. to 10. Executive Order 12988 40 CFR Part 300 8 p.m. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As required by section 3 of Executive [FRL–8022–9] Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300 1996), in issuing this rule, EPA has National Oil and Hazardous Substance Environmental protection, Air taken the necessary steps to eliminate Pollution Contingency Plan; National pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize Priorities List substances, Hazardous waste, potential litigation, and provide a clear Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, legal standard for affected conduct. AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Reporting and recordkeeping 11. Executive Order 12630: Evaluation ACTION: Technical correction of direct requirements, Superfund, Water of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated final partial deletion. pollution control, Water supply. Takings Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. EPA has complied with Executive SUMMARY: On September 21, 2005, EPA 9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, published a notice of intent to delete (70 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923; 1988) by examining the takings FR 55329) and a direct final notice of 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193. implications of the rule in accordance deletion (70 FR 55296) for a portion of Dated: December 29, 2005. with the Attorney General’s the Tar Lake Superfund Site from the Gary V. Gulezian, National Priorities List. The EPA is Supplemental Guidelines for the Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of publishing this Technical Correction to V. Unanticipated Takings issued under the the direct final notice of deletion due to Technical Correction Executive Order. errors that were published in Appendix B in direct final Notice of Deletion. I In direct final rule FR Doc. 05–18834, 12. Congressional Review Act After review of the direct final Notice of beginning on page 55300, 3rd column, Deletion, EPA is publishing today this EPA will submit a report containing in the issue of September 21, 2005, Technical Correction to change the this rule and other information required make the following correction. The word ‘‘ removing’’ to the word by the Congressional Review Act (5 correction should read as follows: U.S.C. 801 et seq.) to the U.S. Senate, ‘‘revising’’ and the location of the site the U.S. House of Representatives, and from the township ‘‘Mancelona, Appendix B to Part 300—[Corrected] the Comptroller General of the United ,’’ to the ‘‘Mancelona I 2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300 States prior to publication in the Township, Michigan.’’ EPA will place a is amended under Michigan ‘‘MI’’ by Federal Register. A major rule cannot copy of the final deletion package in the revising the entry for ‘‘Tar Lake’’ to read take effect until 60 days after it is site repositories. as follows: published in the Federal Register. This DATES: This Technical Correction of the action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined direct final action is effective as of Appendix B to Part 300—National by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). January 20, 2006. Priorities List

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:32 Jan 19, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\20JAR1.SGM 20JAR1 cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES 3228 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations

TABLE 1.—GENERAL SUPERFUND SECTION

State Site name City/county Notes a

******* MI ...... Tar Lake ...... Antrim ...... P

******* (a) *** P=Sites with partial deletion(s).

* * * * * Time Observance in finding that the move would not serve the ‘‘convenience of commerce.’’ [FR Doc. E6–572 Filed 1–19–06; 8:45 am] General History BILLING CODE 6560–50–P With regard to the counties in The for Indiana has been , in 1986, the Jasper the subject of much debate since time County Commissioners and the Starke zones were established, as noted by County Commissioners made separate DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DOT in a notice proposing to change the requests to move each county from the time zone in Indiana, 56 FR 13609 to the Eastern Time Office of the Secretary (April 3, 1991). In 1918, when the Zone. DOT denied their requests, Federal government first established finding that changing the boundaries 49 CFR Part 71 time zones, all of Indiana was in the would not serve the ‘‘convenience of Central Time Zone. In 1961, the commerce.’’ In 1991, in a subsequent [OST DOCKET NO. 2005–22114] Interstate Commerce Commission, proceeding, based on another request DOT’s predecessor in setting time zones, from the Starke County Commissioners, RIN 2105–AD53 moved the eastern half of Indiana to the DOT changed the time zone boundary to Eastern Time Zone, but denied requests move Starke County into the Eastern Zone Boundary in the to move more of the State. Time Zone. State of Indiana In 1967, at the request of the Governor of Indiana, in a notice of proposed Current Indiana Time Observance AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), rulemaking, DOT proposed to restore Under Federal law, 82 Indiana the Department of Transportation the entire State to the Central Time counties are in the Eastern Time Zone (DOT). Zone. However, in 1968, DOT modified and 10 are in the Central Time Zone. ACTION: Final rule. its proposal and proposed instead that The Central Time Zone counties include SUMMARY: DOT is relocating the time the entire State be in the Eastern Time five in the northwest (Lake, Porter, La zone boundary in Indiana to move Zone with the exception of six counties Porte, Newton, and Jasper) and five in Starke, Pulaski, Knox, Daviess, Martin, in the northwest and seven in the the southwest (Posey, Vanderburgh, Pike, Dubois, and Perry Counties from southwest which would remain in the Warrick, Spencer and Gibson). the Eastern Time Zone to the Central Central Time Zone. That modified Neighboring States observe both eastern Time Zone. DOT is not changing the proposal was supported by the and central time. Illinois and western time zone boundary to move St. Joseph, commenters, with one exception. observe central time, while Marshall, Fulton, Benton, White, Commenters did not support moving eastern Kentucky, , and the portion Carroll, Cass, Vermillion, Sullivan, and one of the southwest counties to the of Michigan adjoining Indiana observe Lawrence Counties from the Eastern Central Time Zone. Subsequently, eastern time. Time Zone to the Central Time Zone. effective April 27, 1969, time zone Federal law provides that it is up to This action is taken in response to boundaries were established to place all an individual State to decide whether or petitions filed by the County of Indiana in the Eastern Time Zone not to observe . Commissioners and extensive comment with the exception of six counties in the Generally, a State must choose to provided at public hearings and to the northwest and six counties in the observe, or not observe, Daylight Saving docket. southwest. Time across the entire State. The one With regard to the counties in exception is that, if a State is in more DATES: The effective date of this rule is southwest Indiana, in 1977, the Pike than one time zone, a ‘‘split’’ observance 2 a.m. EST Sunday, April 2, 2006, County Commissioners petitioned DOT is permitted. Under this scenario, all of which is the changeover date from to be moved to the Eastern Time Zone. a State that is in one time zone may standard time to Daylight Saving Time. After proposing the change and observe Daylight Saving Time, while the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: receiving comments, DOT moved Pike remainder of the State in the different Judith S. Kaleta, Office of the General County to the Eastern Time Zone. The time zone does not. Under Indiana law, Counsel, U.S. Department of Indiana General Assembly requested for many years, the Central Time Zone Transportation, Room 10428, 400 that DOT move the 5 remaining portion of the State has observed Seventh Street, Washington, DC 20590, southwest counties from the Central Daylight Saving Time, while the Eastern [email protected]; (202) 366–9283. Time Zone to the Eastern Time Zone, in Time Zone portion of the State has not SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 1985, but DOT denied the request, observed Daylight Saving Time.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:32 Jan 19, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\20JAR1.SGM 20JAR1 cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES