62288 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 209 / Monday, October 31, 2005 / Proposed Rules

(d) The split specimen failed to 7. Invalid Result (number) ADDRESSES: You may submit comments reconfirm all of the primary specimen by any of the following methods: results, and reported that the split Appendix F to Part 40—[Amended] • Web Site: http://dms.dot.gov. specimen was invalid. You must follow 32. Appendix F to Part 40 is proposed Follow the instructions for submitting the procedures in 40.187(c)(1) to be amended by removing the comments on the DOT electronic docket (recollection under direct observation is references to § 40.187(a)–(f) and site. required in this case). § 40.191(d) and adding in their place • Fax: 1–202–493–2251. (e) The split specimen failed to § 40.187(a)–(e) and § 40.191(e), • Mail: Docket Management Facility; reconfirm all of the primary specimen respectively. U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 results because the split specimen was Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, [FR Doc. 05–21488 Filed 10–28–05; 8:45 am] not available for testing or there was no Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590– split laboratory available to test the BILLING CODE 4910–62–P 001. specimen. You must follow applicable • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on procedures in 40.187(e) (recollection DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION the plaza level of the Nassif Building, under direct observation is required in 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, this case). Office of the Secretary DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday * * * * * through Friday, except Federal 49 CFR Part 71 Holidays. § 40.207 [Amended] • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 30. Section 40.207 is proposed to be [OST Docket No. 2005–22114] http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the amended by removing, in paragraph RIN 2105–AD53 online instructions for submitting (a)(3), the reference to ‘‘40.187(b)’’ and comments. adding in its place ‘‘40.187(b)(3), (c)(1), Standard Time Zone Boundary in the Instructions: All submissions must and (e)’’. State of Indiana include the agency name and docket 31. Appendix B to Part 40 is proposed AGENCY: number (OST Docket Number 2005– to be amended by revising it to read as Office of the Secretary (OST), Department of Transportation (DOT). 22114) or Regulatory Identification follows: Number (RIN) (2105–AD53) for this ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. Appendix B to Part 40—DOT Drug rulemaking. Note that all comments Testing Semi-Annual Laboratory SUMMARY: DOT tentatively proposes to received will be posted without change Report relocate the time zone boundary in to http://dms.dot.gov including any Indiana to move St. Joseph, Starke, personal information provided. Please The summary report shall contain the Knox, Pike, and Perry Counties from the see the Privacy Act heading under following information: eastern time zone to the central time Regulatory Notices. Reporting Period: (inclusive dates) zone at the request of the County Docket: For access to the docket to Laboratory Identification: (name and address) Commissioners. We are tentatively not read background documents or Employer Identification: (name; may include proposing to change the time zone comments received, go to http:// Billing Code or ID code) boundary to move Marshall, Pulaski, dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room PL– C/TPA Identification: (where applicable; 401 on the plaza level of the Nassif name and address) Fulton, Benton, White, Carroll, Cass, 1. Specimen Results Reported (total number) Vermillion, Sullivan, Daviess, Dubois, Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., By Type of Test Martin, and Lawrence Counties from the Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 (a) Pre-employment (number) eastern time zone to the central time p.m., Monday through Friday, except (b) Post-Accident (number) zone based on the petitions from the Federal Holidays. (c) Random (number) commissioners in these counties. If Public Hearings: In addition to the (d) Reasonable Suspicion/Cause (number) additional information is provided that submission of written comments, an (e) Return-to-Duty (number) indicates that the time zone boundary opportunity for oral comments will be (f) Follow-up (number) should be drawn differently, either to provided at four public hearings in (g) Type of Test Not Noted on CCF Jasper, Logansport, South Bend, and (number) include counties currently excluded or 2. Specimens Reported to exclude counties that are currently Terre Haute. These hearings will be (a) Negative (number) included in this proposal, we will make chaired by a representative of DOT in (b) Negative and Dilute (number) the change at the final rule stage of this November. We will publish the date and 3. Specimens Reported as Rejected for proceeding. time in a separate document that will be Testing (total number) DATES: Any County Commissioners from posted in the docket and published in By Reason the counties that have submitted the Federal Register. (a) Fatal flaw (number) petitions who wish to provide The hearings will be informal and (b) Uncorrected Flaw (number) additional data to justify a change from will be tape-recorded for inclusion in 4. Specimens Reported as Positive (total the docket. The DOT representative will number) the eastern time zone to the central time By Drug zone should do so by November 10, provide an opportunity to speak for all (a) Marijuana Metabolite (number) 2005. Other comments should be those wishing to do so, to the greatest (b) Cocaine Metabolite (number) received by November 30, 2005 to be extent possible. The hearing locations (c) Opiates (number) assured of consideration. Comments will be accessible for persons with (1) Codeine (number) received after that date will be disabilities. If you need a sign language (2) Morphine (number) considered to the extent practicable. If interpreter, please let us know no later (3) 6–AM (number) the time zone boundary is changed as a than one week before the hearing. (d) Phencyclidine (number) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (e) Amphetamines (number) result of this rulemaking, the effective (1) Amphetamine (number) date would be no earlier than 2 a.m. Joanne Petrie, Office of the Assistant (2) Methamphetamine (number) EST Sunday, April 2, 2006, which is the General Counsel for Regulation and 5. Adulterated (number) changeover from standard time to Enforcement, U.S. Department of 6. Substituted (number) daylight saving time. Transportation, Room 10424, 400

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:43 Oct 28, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM 31OCP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 209 / Monday, October 31, 2005 / Proposed Rules 62289

Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC statute for such decisions is ‘‘regard for Indiana’s Decision To Observe Daylight 20590, [email protected]; (202) 366– the convenience of commerce and the Saving Time 9306. existing junction points and division SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: points of common carriers engaged in In 2005, the Indiana General interstate or foreign commerce.’’ Assembly adopted legislation (Indiana Current Indiana Time Observance Senate Enrolled Act 127 or ‘‘the Indiana Under Federal law, 82 Indiana DOT Procedures To Change a Time Act’’) providing that the entire State of counties are in the eastern time zone Zone Boundary Indiana will begin to observe daylight and 10 are in the central time zone. The The Department has typically used a saving time beginning in 2006. In central time zone counties include five set of procedures to address time zone addition, the Indiana Act addressed the in the northwest (Lake, Porter, La Porte, issues. Under these DOT procedures, issue of changing the location of the Newton, and Jasper) and five in the the Department will generally begin a boundary between the eastern and southwest (Posey, Vanderburgh, rulemaking proceeding if the highest central time zones. The Indiana Act Warrick, Spencer and Gibson). The elected officials in the area provide stated that, ‘‘[T]he [S]tate supports the remaining 82 counties are in the eastern adequate supporting data for the county executive of any county that time zone. Neighboring States observe proposed change. We ask that the seeks to change the time zone in which both eastern and central time. Illinois petition include, or be accompanied by, the county is located under the and western Kentucky observe central detailed information supporting the procedures established by Federal time, while eastern Kentucky, Ohio, and requesting party’s contention that the Law.’’ The Indiana Act also provided the portion of Michigan adjoining requested change would serve the that, ‘‘The governor and the general Indiana observe eastern time. convenience of commerce. The assembly hereby petition the United Federal law provides that it is up to principal standard for deciding whether States Department of Transportation to an individual State to decide whether or to change a time zone is defined very initiate proceedings under the Uniform not to observe daylight saving time. broadly to include consideration of all Time Act of 1966 to hold hearings in the Generally, a State must choose to the impacts upon a community of a appropriate locations in Indiana on the observe, or not observe, across the entire change in its standard of time. We also issue of the location of the boundary State. The one exception is that, if a ask that the supporting documentation State is in more than one time zone, a between the Central Time Zone and the address, at a minimum, each of the ‘‘split’’ observance is permitted. Under Eastern Time Zone in Indiana.’’ Finally, following questions in as much detail as this scenario, all of a State that is in one the Indiana Act requested that DOT possible. time zone may observe daylight saving refrain from changing the time zone of time, while the remainder of the State 1. From where do businesses in the any county currently located within the in the different time zone does not. community get their supplies, and to central time zone and five counties near Under Indiana law, for many years, the where do they ship their goods or Cincinnati and Louisville. central time zone portion of the State products? On July 15, 2005, Secretary Mineta has observed daylight saving time, 2. From where does the community sent a letter to Governor Daniels while the eastern time zone portion of receive television and radio broadcasts? responding to this legislation and letters the State has not observed daylight 3. Where are the newspapers from the Governor. The letter noted that saving time. published that serve the community? it is our normal practice, in The effect of daylight saving time is implementing our responsibilities under the equivalent of moving one time zone 4. From where does the community get its bus and passenger rail services; the Uniform Time Act with respect to to the east. This means that, by the location of time zone boundaries, to remaining on eastern standard time if there is no scheduled bus or passenger rail service in the community to where take action on specific requests for year-round, the eastern time zone change in the time zone boundaries for portion of Indiana has been on the same must residents go to obtain these services? a particular jurisdiction from the elected time as New York in the winter and on officials of that jurisdiction. After the same clock time as Chicago in the 5. Where is the nearest airport; if it is receiving a request, we review it and the summer. The impact of the State a local service airport, to what major supporting data to then determine airport does it carry passengers? legislation (discussed in more detail whether the issuance of an NPRM is below) to observe daylight saving time 6. What percentage of residents of the justified. Once justified, we issue the beginning in 2006 is that, in the community work outside the NPRM to propose a change. summer, the time of sunrise and sunset community; where do these residents on eastern daylight saving time will be work? DOT Notice Inviting Petitions an hour later than it currently is under 7. What are the major elements of the year-round eastern standard time. There On August 17, 2005, DOT published community’s economy; is the a notice in the Federal Register inviting will be no change in the sunrise and community’s economy improving or sunset times during the winter when county and local officials in Indiana that declining; what Federal, State, or local wish to change their current time zone eastern standard time will continue to plans, if any, are there for economic be observed. in response to Indiana Senate Enrolled development in the community? Act 127 to notify DOT of their request Statutory Requirements 8. If residents leave the community for a change by September 16, 2005 and Under the Standard Time Act of 1918, for schooling, recreation, health care, or to provide data in response to the as amended by the Uniform Time Act of religious worship, what standard of time questions above. In addition, it 1966 (15 U.S.C. 260–64), the Secretary is observed in the places where they go announced the opening of an internet- of Transportation has authority to issue for these purposes? accessible, public docket to receive any regulations modifying the boundaries In addition, we consider any other petitions and other relevant documents between time zones in the United States information that the county or local concerning the appropriate placement of in order to move an area from one time officials believe to be relevant to the the time zone boundary in the State of zone to another. The standard in the proceeding. Indiana.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:43 Oct 28, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM 31OCP1 62290 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 209 / Monday, October 31, 2005 / Proposed Rules

Petitions Received all of the State in the central time zone, this information at a public hearing We received nineteen petitions from and maintaining the current time zone chaired by a DOT representative. counties asking to be changed from the boundaries. Some of the commenters St. Joseph, Starke, Knox, Pike, and eastern time zone to the central time included data on sunrise/sunset, Perry County addressed all, or virtually zone. One of the counties (Fountain economic development and trends, all, of the factors that we consider in commuting patterns, school districts County) subsequently withdrew its these proceedings and made a and institutions of higher learning, request. reasonable case that changing to the transportation services, the location of In general, the petitions are clustered central time zone would serve ‘‘the cultural and recreational activities, and in the northwest (St. Joseph, Starke, convenience of commerce.’’ In addition, a wide variety of other factors. Other Marshall, Pulaski, Fulton, Benton, we considered each county’s geographic commenters shared their personal White, Carroll and Cass Counties) and location compared to the current time preferences and their sense of which the southwest (Sullivan, Knox, Daviess, zone boundary and how closely time zone that they most closely Martin, Lawrence, Pike, Dubois and interrelated neighboring counties associate with. Perry Counties). In the central portion of appeared to be. The specific reasons for The focus of this stage of the granting the petitions for each of these western Indiana, only Vermillion proceeding to date has been on the County asked to be changed to central counties differ based on the facts petitions by the counties. At the next specific to each case. For example, St. time. stage, however, we will carefully review The amount of data provided in the Joseph County filed detailed the petitions submitted in light of the information addressing each factor, petitions varied substantially among comments received and data gathered counties. Under our normal procedures, showing how changing to the central during the next stage of this rulemaking time zone would be beneficial for the we do not take action unless the county process. None of the counties where we makes a clear showing that the proposed community. Starke County had been in have tentatively proposed to relocate the the central time zone and it presented change would meet the statutory time zone boundaries and none of the standard. We recognize, however, that evidence of close ties to areas in the counties where we have tentatively central time zone. Based on the this is an unusual case because of the decided not to propose a change should number of counties involved, their evidence presented, Pike County regard their petitions as resolved, nor appears to be closely tied to Evansville relationship to each other and to other should they rely on the current neighboring counties, and the for many goods, services, and activities. proposal, which very well may change Knox and Perry County provided circumstances leading up to these when all the information is available information on their commuting petitions. Although the proposed and a final rule is issued. counties have provided adequate patterns to the central zone, and supporting data to justify the issuance of DOT Determination reliance on Evansville for a majority of an NPRM, we will critically review Based on the petitions and the their communications and contrary and supporting information supporting data filed by the County transportation services. that may be provided by others, and any Commissioners, we find that St. Joseph, We have not included all the counties other related comments and data prior Starke, Knox, Pike, and Perry Counties that petitioned, for a number of reasons. to issuing a final rule. have provided enough information to Some presented almost no arguments or justify proposing to change those supporting data on why it would be Other Communications From Local counties from the eastern to central time appropriate to change the time zone Officials zone. As noted above, we have received boundary. Others addressed all, or most, We also received a number of letters and will review the comments to the factors but acknowledged that a from counties and cities advising us that docket already received. We are now significant connection with the eastern they had considered whether to petition providing a further opportunity to time zone. A number of counties for a change and, at this time at least, others to provide information that might focused on the potential change to their were satisfied with their current time refute or support the basis provided to neighbors’ time zone, and seemed to be zone boundary or wished to stay in the date, to enable a final decision. We are more concerned with staying in the same time zone as Indianapolis, which requesting comments on whether to same time zone as their neighbors than is located in Marion County and is in make the change in any, or all, of the in changing their time zone. In other the eastern time zone. Those counties remaining 13 counties that petitioned cases, the counties seemed to be equally included Warren, Monroe, Orange, for change and on whether we should connected to the eastern and central Steuben, Noble, Hendricks, Jefferson, not adopt any or all of the proposed time zones. Traditionally, we have been Crawford and Jay. The cities of Whiting, changes. If supplementary information reluctant to create ‘‘islands of time’’ by Hebron, and Munster also filed letters is filed by the County Commissioners placing one county in a different time expressing satisfaction with their supporting the inclusion of additional zone from all its neighboring counties in current time zone. counties and it is not otherwise refuted, the State; we consider the affect on an appropriate change will be made in economic, cultural, social, and civic Comments to the Docket the final rule. We invite representatives activities between neighboring counties There are currently nearly 600 entries from any of the counties that filed in making decisions. Finally, we looked to the docket. In addition, we have petitions to submit additional at the distance each county is from the received hundreds of calls, questions, justification to the public docket. In current time zone boundary, the and e-mails on the Indiana time zone order to allow the public time to proximity of each county to important issue. Many comments were filed by comment on any additional information metropolitan areas, and where the major Chambers of Commerce, businesses, that may be submitted by the counties, roads and bridges are located. We wish various community associations and we request any further submissions to to strongly emphasize that our proposal interest groups, and individuals. The be sent to the public docket by is a tentative decision and is subject to commenters suggested a wide variety of November 10, 2005. In addition, we ask change based on additional data approaches including placing all of the that any county that submits additional reviewed in the next stage of this State in the eastern time zone, placing information to the public docket present proceeding.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:43 Oct 28, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM 31OCP1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 209 / Monday, October 31, 2005 / Proposed Rules 62291

In our experience, time zone and Illinois that may also be impacted counties under consideration, please boundary changes can be extremely by any change. For example, we are identify which county or counties you disruptive to a community and, aware of the importance of South Bend are commenting on. therefore, should not be made without to its neighboring communities in Regulatory Analysis & Notices careful consideration. Our proposal is Indiana and Michigan and specifically intended to minimize disruption and to request comment on potential effects to This proposed rule is not a allow communities to fully assess the those communities to the north, east, ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under impact of potential changes to the time and south if St. Joseph County is section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 zone boundaries of their neighbors and changed at the final rule stage and and does not require an assessment of daylight saving time observance placed in a different time zone from the potential costs and benefits under beginning in April 2006. If comments to greater Michiana area as additional section 6(a)(3) of that Order. It has not the docket or at the hearings provide information could change our tentative been reviewed by the Office of additional information or stronger decision. Management and Budget under that arguments for a change, we will make Although the five counties have Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the the appropriate changes in the final submitted sufficient information to regulatory policies and procedures of rule. We are happy to work with county begin the rulemaking process, the the Department of Transportation (44 FR representatives to provide guidance on decision whether actually to make the 11040; February 26, 1979). We expect the kinds of additional supporting data change will also consider information the economic impact of this proposed that would be most useful in making a received at the hearings or submitted in rule to be so minimal that a full case for a change of time zone boundary. writing to the docket. Persons Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph If a county is not included in any final supporting or opposing the change 10e of the regulatory policies and rule that may be issued in this should not assume that the change will procedures of DOT is unnecessary. The proceeding, governmental be made merely because DOT is making rule primarily affects the convenience of representatives are free to petition DOT the proposal. The Department here individuals in scheduling activities. By in the future to make further changes to issues no opinion on the ultimate merits itself, it imposes no direct costs. Its the time zone boundary. of the counties’ requests. Our decision impact is localized in nature. in the final rule will be made on the Small Entities Request for Comments basis of information developed during To aid us in our consideration of the entire rulemaking proceeding, Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act whether a time zone change would be including the petitions. (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we considered ‘‘for the convenience of commerce,’’ we whether this proposed rule would have ask for comments on the impact on Impact on Observance of Daylight a significant economic impact on a commerce of a change in time zone and Saving Time substantial number of small entities. whether a new time zone would As noted above, this time zone The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises improve the convenience of commerce. proposal does not affect the observance small businesses, not-for-profit The comments should address the of daylight saving time. Under the organizations that are independently impact on such things as economic, Uniform Time Act of 1966, as amended, owned and operated and are not cultural, social, and civic activities and the standard time of each time zone in dominant in their fields, and how time zone changes affect the United States is advanced one hour governmental jurisdictions with businesses, communication, from 2 a.m. on the first Sunday in April populations of less than 50,000. This transportation, and education. The until 2 a.m. on the last Sunday in proposal, if adopted, would primarily comments should be as detailed as October, except in any State that has, by affect individuals and their scheduling possible, providing the basis of the law, exempted itself from this of activities. Although it would affect information including factual data or observance. Under recently enacted some small businesses, not-for-profits surveys. For example, with regard to federal legislation, beginning in 2007, and, perhaps, a number of small major bus, rail, and air transportation, daylight saving time will begin the governmental jurisdictions, it would not information such as the average time it second Sunday in March and end the be a substantial number. In addition, the takes for an average county resident to first Sunday in November. change should have little, if any, travel to a transportation terminal or the economic impact. Comment Period average distance to the terminal for a Therefore, I certify under 5 U.S.C. county resident would be useful. With We are providing 30 days for public 605(b) that this proposed rule would regard to the impact of the time zone on comments in this proceeding. Although not, if adopted, have a significant education, if a school district crosses we normally provide 60 days for public economic impact on a substantial county lines, the number of students in comments on proposed rules, we number of small entities. If you think each county in that district would be believe that 30 days is an adequate that your business, organization, or helpful. Information on school activities public comment period in this instance. governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a such as sporting events or academic It is important to resolve this small entity and that this rule would competitions that take place in other rulemaking expeditiously so that we can have a significant economic impact on counties or locations that are not on the provide ample notice if changes to the it, please submit a comment to the same time zone as the school district time zone boundaries are adopted. Since Docket Management Facility at the would also be useful. Similar the introduction and passage of the address under ADDRESSES. In your information on community colleges State legislation, the time zone comment, explain why you think it could also be beneficial. Finally, we boundary issue has been actively qualifies and how and to what degree would appreciate information on how discussed and analyzed. In this regard, this rule would economically affect it. the different time zones affect the we expect that 30 days is adequate time Under section 213(a) of the Small students and the schools. to gather the necessary data, which is Business Regulatory Enforcement We specifically invite comment from based on currently available Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), neighboring Indiana counties, and information, or share personal we want to assist small entities in counties in Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio, preferences. Because of the number of understanding this proposed rule so that

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:43 Oct 28, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM 31OCP1 62292 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 209 / Monday, October 31, 2005 / Proposed Rules

they can better evaluate its effects on minimize litigation, eliminate Uniform Time Act of 1966 and Pub. L. 97– them and participate in the rulemaking. ambiguity, and reduce burden. 449, 15 U.S.C. 260–267; Pub. L. 99–359; 49 If the rule would affect your small CFR 159(a), unless otherwise noted. Protection of Children business, organization, or governmental 2. Paragraph (b) of § 71.5, Boundary We have analyzed this proposed rule jurisdiction and you have questions line between eastern and central zones, under E.O. 13045, Protection of concerning its provisions or options for is revised to read as follows: compliance, please call Joanne Petrie at Children from Environmental Health (202) 366–9315. Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not § 71.5 Boundary line between eastern and an economically significant rule and central zones. Collection of Information does not concern an environmental risk * * * * * This proposed rule would call for no to health or risk to safety that may (b) Indiana-Illinois. From the junction new collection of information under the disproportionately affect children. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 of the western boundary of the State of U.S.C. 3501–3520). Environment Michigan with the northern boundary of This rulemaking is not a major the State of Indiana easterly along the Federalism Federal action significantly affecting the northern boundary of the State of We have analyzed this proposed rule quality of the human environment Indiana to the east line of St. Joseph under E.O. 12612 and have determined under the National Environmental County; thence south along the east line that this rule does not have sufficient Policy Act and, therefore, an of St. Joseph County to the border with implications for federalism to warrant environmental impact statement is not Marshall County; thence west along the the preparation of a Federalism required. north line of Marshall County; thence Assessment. south along the west line of Marshall Privacy Act County; thence west along the south Unfunded Mandates Anyone is able to search the line of Starke County; thence south The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act electronic form of all comments along the east line of Jasper County; of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) and E.O. received into any of our dockets by the thence south and west along the south 12875, Enhancing the Intergovernmental name of the individual submitting the line of Jasper County; thence west along Partnership, (58 FR 58093; October 28, comment (or signing the comment, if the south line of Newton County to the 1993) govern the issuance of Federal submitted on behalf of an association, intersection of Indiana-Illinois border; regulations that impose unfunded business, labor union, etc.). You may thence south along the Indiana-Illinois mandates. An unfunded mandate is a review DOT’s complete Privacy Act border to the intersection with the regulation that requires a State, local, or Statement in the Federal Register northwest corner of Knox County; tribal government or the private sector published on April 11, 2000 (Volume thence east along the north line of Knox to incur direct costs without the Federal 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you County; thence south and west along the Government’s having first provided the may visit http://dms.dot.gov. east line of Knox County to the funds to pay those costs. This proposed intersection with Pike County; thence rule would not impose an unfunded List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 71 easterly along the northeast line of Pike mandate. Time zones. County; thence south along the east line of Pike County; thence east along the Taking of Private Property For the reasons discussed above, the Office of the Secretary proposes to south line of Dubois County; thence This proposed rule would not result amend Title 49 part 71 to read as north and east along the line between in a taking of private property or follows: Dubois and Perry County; thence east otherwise have taking implications and south along the northeast line of under E.O. 12630, Governmental PART 71—STANDARD TIME ZONE Perry County to the border of Indiana Actions and Interference with BOUNDARIES and Kentucky. Constitutionally Protected Property Issued in Washington, DC on October 25, Rights. 1. The authority citation for Part 71 continues to read as follows: 2005. Civil Justice Reform Jeffrey A. Rosen, Authority: Secs. 1–4, 40 Stat. 450, as This proposed rule meets applicable amended; sec. 1, 41 Stat. 1446, as amended; General Counsel. standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of secs. 2–7, 80 Stat. 107, as amended; 100 Stat. [FR Doc. 05–21606 Filed 10–26–05; 4:59 pm] E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to 764; Act of Mar. 19, 1918, as amended by the BILLING CODE 4910–02–P

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:43 Oct 28, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM 31OCP1