Summary As Reported from Committee
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Daylight Saving Time
Daylight Saving Time Beth Cook Information Research Specialist March 9, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44411 Daylight Saving Time Summary Daylight Saving Time (DST) is a period of the year between spring and fall when clocks in the United States are set one hour ahead of standard time. DST is currently observed in the United States from 2:00 a.m. on the second Sunday in March until 2:00 a.m. on the first Sunday in November. The following states and territories do not observe DST: Arizona (except the Navajo Nation, which does observe DST), Hawaii, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. Congressional Research Service Daylight Saving Time Contents When and Why Was Daylight Saving Time Enacted? .................................................................... 1 Has the Law Been Amended Since Inception? ................................................................................ 2 Which States and Territories Do Bot Observe DST? ...................................................................... 2 What Other Countries Observe DST? ............................................................................................. 2 Which Federal Agency Regulates DST in the United States? ......................................................... 3 How Does an Area Move on or off DST? ....................................................................................... 3 How Can States and Territories Change an Area’s Time Zone? ..................................................... -
Daylight Saving Time (DST)
Daylight Saving Time (DST) Updated September 30, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45208 Daylight Saving Time (DST) Summary Daylight Saving Time (DST) is a period of the year between spring and fall when clocks in most parts of the United States are set one hour ahead of standard time. DST begins on the second Sunday in March and ends on the first Sunday in November. The beginning and ending dates are set in statute. Congressional interest in the potential benefits and costs of DST has resulted in changes to DST observance since it was first adopted in the United States in 1918. The United States established standard time zones and DST through the Calder Act, also known as the Standard Time Act of 1918. The issue of consistency in time observance was further clarified by the Uniform Time Act of 1966. These laws as amended allow a state to exempt itself—or parts of the state that lie within a different time zone—from DST observance. These laws as amended also authorize the Department of Transportation (DOT) to regulate standard time zone boundaries and DST. The time period for DST was changed most recently in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005; P.L. 109-58). Congress has required several agencies to study the effects of changes in DST observance. In 1974, DOT reported that the potential benefits to energy conservation, traffic safety, and reductions in violent crime were minimal. In 2008, the Department of Energy assessed the effects to national energy consumption of extending DST as changed in EPACT 2005 and found a reduction in total primary energy consumption of 0.02%. -
Impact of Extended Daylight Saving Time on National Energy Consumption
Impact of Extended Daylight Saving Time on National Energy Consumption TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION FOR REPORT TO CONGRESS Energy Policy Act of 2005, Section 110 Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy By David B. Belzer (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), Stanton W. Hadley (Oak Ridge National Laboratory), and Shih-Miao Chin (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) October 2008 U.S. Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Page Intentionally Left Blank Acknowledgements The Department of Energy (DOE) acknowledges the important contributions made to this study by the principal investigators and primary authors—David B. Belzer, Ph.D (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), Stanton W. Hadley (Oak Ridge National Laboratory), and Shih-Miao Chin, Ph.D (Oak Ridge National Laboratory). Jeff Dowd (DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy) was the DOE project manager, and Margaret Mann (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) provided technical and project management assistance. Two expert panels provided review comments on the study methodologies and made important and generous contributions. 1. Electricity and Daylight Saving Time Panel – technical review of electricity econometric modeling: • Randy Barcus (Avista Corp) • Adrienne Kandel, Ph.D (California Energy Commission) • Hendrik Wolff, Ph.D (University of Washington) 2. Transportation Sector Panel – technical review of analytical methods: • Harshad Desai (Federal Highway Administration) • Paul Leiby, Ph.D (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) • John Maples (DOE Energy Information Administration) • Art Rypinski (Department of Transportation) • Tom White (DOE Office of Policy and International Affairs) The project team also thanks Darrell Beschen (DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy), Doug Arent, Ph.D (National Renewable Energy Laboratory), and Bill Babiuch, Ph.D (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) for their helpful management review. -
Bill Analysis
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES FINAL BILL ANALYSIS BILL #: HB 1013 FINAL HOUSE FLOOR ACTION: SUBJECT/SHORT Daylight Saving Time 103 Y’s 11 N’s TITLE SPONSOR(S): Nuñez; Fitzenhagen and others GOVERNOR’S Approved ACTION: COMPANION CS/CS/SB 858 BILLS: SUMMARY ANALYSIS HB 1013 passed the House on February 14, 2018, and subsequently passed the Senate on March 6, 2018. The bill declares the Legislature’s intent to observe Daylight Saving Time year-round throughout the entire state if federal law is amended to permit states to take such action. The bill does not appear to have a fiscal impact. The bill was approved by the Governor on March 23, 2018, ch. 2018-99, L.O.F., and will become effective on July 1, 2018. This document does not reflect the intent or official position of the bill sponsor or House of Representatives. STORAGE NAME: h1013z1.LFV.docx DATE: March 28, 2018 I. SUBSTANTIVE INFORMATION A. EFFECT OF CHANGES: Present Situation The Standard Time Act of 1918 In 1918, the United States enacted the Standard Time Act, which adopted a national standard measure of time, created five standard time zones across the continental U.S., and instituted Daylight Saving Time (DST) nationwide as a war effort during World War I.1 DST advanced standard time by one hour from the last Sunday in March to the last Sunday in October.2 DST was repealed after the war but the standard time provisions remained in place.3 During World War II, a national DST standard was revived and extended year-round from 1942 to 1945.4 Uniform Time Act of 1966 Following World War -
Page 584 TITLE 15—COMMERCE and TRADE § 260A §260A
§ 260a TITLE 15—COMMERCE AND TRADE Page 584 EFFECTIVE DATE AMENDMENTS Pub. L. 89–387, § 6, Apr. 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 108, provided 2005—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–58 substituted ‘‘second that: ‘‘This Act [enacting this section and sections Sunday of March’’ for ‘‘first Sunday of April’’ and 260a, 266, and 267 of this title and amending sections 261 ‘‘first Sunday of November’’ for ‘‘last Sunday of Octo- to 263 of this title] shall take effect on April 1, 1967; ex- ber’’. cept that if any State, the District of Columbia, the 1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–359 substituted ‘‘first Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any possession of the Sunday of April’’ for ‘‘last Sunday of April’’. United States, or any political subdivision thereof, ob- 1983—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 97–449 substituted ‘‘Sec- serves daylight saving time in the year 1966, such time retary of Transportation or his’’ for ‘‘Interstate Com- shall advance the standard time otherwise applicable in merce Commission or its’’. such place by one hour and shall commence at 2 o’clock 1972—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 92–267 authorized any State antemeridian on the last Sunday in April of the year with parts thereof lying in more than one time zone to 1966 and shall end at 2 o’clock antemeridian on the last exempt by law that part of such State lying within any Sunday in October of the year 1966.’’ time zone from provisions of this subsection providing for advancement of time. SHORT TITLE EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2005 AMENDMENT Pub. L. -
49 CFR Subtitle a (10–1–10 Edition) § 71.1
§ 71.1 49 CFR Subtitle A (10–1–10 Edition) 71.6 Central zone. § 71.2 Annual advancement of stand- 71.7 Boundary line between central and ard time. mountain zones. 71.8 Mountain zone. (a) The Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 71.9 Boundary line between mountain and U.S.C. 260a(a)), as amended, requires Pacific zones. that the standard time of each State 71.10 Pacific zone. observing Daylight Saving Time shall 71.11 Alaska zone. be advanced 1 hour beginning at 2:00 71.12 Hawaii-Aleutian zone. 71.13 Samoa zone. a.m. on the first Sunday in April of 71.14 Chamorro Zone. each year and ending on the last Sun- day in October. This advanced time AUTHORITY: Secs. 1–4, 40 Stat. 450, as amended; sec. 1, 41 Stat. 1446, as amended; shall be the standard time of each zone secs. 2–7, 80 Stat. 107, as amended; 100 Stat. during such period. The Act authorizes 764; Act of Mar. 19, 1918, as amended by the any State to exempt itself from this re- Uniform Time Act of 1966 and Pub. L. 97–449, quirement. States in two or more time 15 U.S.C. 260–267; Pub. L. 99–359; Pub. L. 106– zones may exempt the easternmost 564, 15 U.S.C. 263, 114 Stat. 2811; 49 CFR time zone portion from this require- 1.59(a), unless otherwise noted. ment. SOURCE: Amdt. 71–11, 35 FR 12318, Aug. 1, (b) Section 3(b) of the Uniform Time 1970, unless otherwise noted. -
Special Commission on Commonwealth's Time Zone Report
Report of the Special Commission on the Commonwealth’s Time Zone November 1, 2017 1 Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................3 Purpose of the Commission .......................................................................................6 Structure of the Commission .....................................................................................6 Background ................................................................................................................8 Findings ....................................................................................................................12 Economic Development: Commerce and Trade ...................................................12 Labor and Workforce ............................................................................................14 Public Health .........................................................................................................15 Energy ...................................................................................................................16 Crime and Criminal Justice...................................................................................18 Transportation .......................................................................................................19 Broadcasting .........................................................................................................20 Education and School Start-Times .......................................................................21 -
Call Centers in Missouri 2
Call Centers in Missouri 2 Call Centers in Missouri Missouri’s central location and easy to understand accent gives companies the talent and the workday flexibility to provide call center support nationwide. Call centers in Missouri are able to provide excellent customer service while simultaneously keeping costs low. With a diverse economy, large workforce and metro areas throughout the state, Missouri has the ability to support any business from back-office opera- tions to traditional customer service centers. The state also boasts a number of micropolitan areas with lower saturation rates and competitive wages for call centers. When it comes to call centers, Missouri has a spot for just about everybody. 3 Missouri’s Call Centers Missouri's top call centers by employment 1 2 3 Call center 4 5 6 7 8 ¤£71 ¤£136 !( Maryville !( Kirksville ¤£61 ¤£63 ¤£169 9 10 (!!( (!(!(!(! St. Joseph ¤£36 !( (! ¨¦§(!72 ¤£59 ¨¦§35 ¨¦§29 24 !( ¤£ Moberly !( ¤£54 (!(!(! ¤£69 (!5 6(! (! (!(!(!(!!( ! Kansas City (!!((!(!( !( Marshall Mexico 10(!(!(!(!(!5 (! 70 ¤£40 !( (!(! (!(! ¨¦§ (! (! Columbia 2(! (!(! !(! !( (!(!(! (!(!(!(!((! (! (!(!(!(!(!(!(!!(4 St. Louis Warrensburg !( (!(! (!(!(!(!(!(!(! Sedalia (!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!((!(!(!(!(! (!(!(!!( (! (! 1 (!(!(!(!(!(!(! 5 (! (! (!(!(! ¤£50 (! ¤£65 (! (! ¨¦§49 (! ¨¦§44 !( Fort Leonard Wood !( Farmington (! !((! Lebanon ¨¦§55 ¤£67 ¤£160 (!!( 3 5 7 (! Cape Girardeau (! (!(!(!!( 5 (! 8(!(!(!!(!(!(!9 Springfield (!(!!( (! (!(! (!(!5 Joplin ¤£60 !( Sikeston¤£62 ¨¦§57 (! !( West Plains !( Poplar Bluff (!(! ¤£160 !( Kennett 4 Top Call Center Employers in Missouri Many industries seeing growth in call centers and back office operations are already big in Missouri including professional services, financial services and health innovation. 5 6 Recent Projects AT&T (Various Locations), announced plans to hire One Call Care Management (Springfield), selected 150 call center workers in Cape Girardeau and 100 the Springfield Region to expand its operations. -
Is Year-Round Daylight Saving Time a Good Idea? Maybe Not
SenatorReady_FAV_SB0517 Uploaded by: Senator Ready, Senator Ready Position: FAV March, 05 Senate Bill 517: General Provisions - Standard Time - Year-Round Daylight Saving Time Chairman Pinsky, Vice Chair Kagan, members of the Committee, I am here today to present SB 517 which would signal Maryland’s desire to remain on Daylight Saving Time year round. To date, forty-two states are entertaining or have passed legislation on the issue while two—Arizona and Hawaii—only observe their respective standard times. Daylight Saving Time was initially implemented during World War I to save energy, but maintained unexpected popularity among Americans after the war, and was re-introduced year round during World War II for the same energy saving reasons.1 However, with the technological advances we have realized today there is no significant energy saving associated with the time change process. What has not changed, on the other hand, is the continued popularity of Daylight Time among Americans and their desire to make it permanent. The Federal Uniform Time Act of 1966—which codified Daylight Saving Time at the federal level—has been amended twice; both times extended the Daylight Saving period. The most recent change was a 2005 amendment which took effect in 2007. These changes to the original Act demonstrate the flexibility of time adjustment and offer precedent when considering changes at the state level. The Federal Uniform Time Act currently allows states to adopt the Standard Time of their current time zone, but not Daylight Time. The purpose of passing this bill would be to add our name to the list of states asking the federal government to amend the Act and allow us to adopt Daylight Time permanently. -
Nickname of Minnesota: North Star State, Gopher State, Land of 10000 Lakes Geography of Minnesota
GENERAL INFORMATION: Nickname of Minnesota: North Star State, Gopher State, Land of 10,000 lakes Geography of Minnesota: Minnesota is the most northerly of all the states (reaching lat. 49°23'55"N), except for Alaska. Saint Paul, the capital, and its larger twin, Minneapolis, are the two largest cities. Winter locks the land in snow, spring is beautiful but brief, summers are warm and autumn brings brilliant colors to our trees and hillsides. Prehistoric glaciers left marshes, boulder-strewn hills, and rich, gray drift soil stretching from the northern pine wilderness to the broad southern prairies. In the vast pine forest of northern Minnesota, is the beginning of the great river known to the world as the Mighty Mississippi. The state has more than 11,000 lakes and numerous streams and rivers. The beauty of Minnesota's lakes and dense green forests, as seen in Voyageurs National Park, has long attracted vacationers, and there is excellent fishing in the state's many rivers, lakes, and streams. Also of interest to tourists are the Grand Portage and Pipestone National monuments, Itasca State Park (at the headwaters of the Mississippi), and the world's largest open-pit iron mine at Hibbing. The Host City, Minneapolis: Minneapolis is a world-class city, with fabulous shopping, dining and entertainment. The music and theater scene is top-notch, with everything from Broadway shows to local and national bands. Tony Award-winners Theatre de la Jeune Lune, The Children’s Theatre Company and the Guthrie Theater all call Minneapolis home, as well as three historic theatres that make up the Hennepin Theatre District. -
All Times Are Eastern Time Zone (New York, United States)
All times are Eastern Time Zone (New York, United States) Time (ET) Lecture Title/Event Summary Planned Speaker Day 1: Overview and International Perspectives: Clinical Experience (Wednesday, September 22, 2021) Session Co-Chairs: Matthias Baumgartner, University Children’s Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland, Gerard Berry, Boston Children’s Hospital, United States, & Cynthia Le Mons, National Urea Cycle Disorders Foundation, Pasadena, United States 1100-1110 Welcome Andrea Gropman and Cynthia Le Mons, Symposium Co-Chairs 1110-1120 Session Introduction Gerard Berry, Session Scientific Program Chair 1120-1135 Overview of UCD and Australian Experience Bridget Wilcken, Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia 1135-1150 Overview if UCD in Japan Fumio Endo, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, Japan 1150-1205 Overview of UCD in Middle East Overviews and perspectives on the UCD Sarar Mohamed, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia clinical experience and recent research from 1205-1220 The Challenge of Elucidating/Understanding Stefan Kölker, University Children’s, Heidelberg, Germany around the globe. Phenotypic Diversity 1220-1235 Overview of UCD in South America Soledad Kleppe, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Argentina 1235-1250 UCDC – Knowledge Gaps and Unknowns Susan A. Berry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States 1250-1330 Discussion Panel Open discussions with all speakers Moderators: Gerard Berry & Matthias Baumgartner 1330-1430 Poster Session Juniorfrom session Investigator/trainees present their Lead: Sandesh -
Daylight Saving Time/Standard Time Legislative Update 2021
Stickies 3/9/21, 10:02 AM March 9, 2021 Dear members of the Senate Political Subdivisions committee, Below are two recent blog posts from my blog: sco.tt/time. That is the source of so much of the information that Legislators have been relying on for more than six years now. In short, the bill before you, HB1371, is excellent. It’s in line with other bills around the country, and especially with your neighboring states. I will be happy to answer any questions that you might have. Respectfully submitted, Scott Yates Denver, Colorado Daylight Saving Time/Standard Time Legislative Update 2021 Last year at this time I had just finished testifying in Atlanta, and I had high hopes that we’d get to 20 states that had passed some kind of bill to #LockTheClock in 2020. Well, as we know, 2020 through us all for a loop. A few states that move really fast, like Wyoming and Louisiana, got a bill Page 1 of 17 Stickies 3/9/21, 10:02 AM done before everything went to crap, but we ended up with only 15 states that have taken action. This year is poised to blast through the progress from last year. The bills I’ve seen, testified on, and talked to sponsors about are absolutely blazing through. My last trip before Covid was to Atlanta in support of Wes Cantrell One big thing that’s different this year is that I’m able to be many more places at the same time, through the magic of zoom.