IPPC): Use of Reference Material in International Diagnostic Protocols
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
<I>Tilletia Indica</I>
ISPM 27 27 ANNEX 4 ENG DP 4: Tilletia indica Mitra INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES PHYTOSANITARY FOR STANDARD INTERNATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOLS Produced by the Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) This page is intentionally left blank This diagnostic protocol was adopted by the Standards Committee on behalf of the Commission on Phytosanitary Measures in January 2014. The annex is a prescriptive part of ISPM 27. ISPM 27 Diagnostic protocols for regulated pests DP 4: Tilletia indica Mitra Adopted 2014; published 2016 CONTENTS 1. Pest Information ............................................................................................................................... 2 2. Taxonomic Information .................................................................................................................... 2 3. Detection ........................................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Examination of seeds/grain ............................................................................................... 3 3.2 Extraction of teliospores from seeds/grain, size-selective sieve wash test ....................... 3 4. Identification ..................................................................................................................................... 4 4.1 Morphology of teliospores ................................................................................................ 4 4.1.1 Morphological -
Use of Whole Genome Sequence Data to Characterize Mating and Rna
USE OF WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCE DATA TO CHARACTERIZE MATING AND RNA SILENCING GENES IN TILLETIA SPECIES By SEAN WESLEY MCCOTTER A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN PLANT PATHOLOGY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Plant Pathology DECEMBER 2014 © Copyright by SEAN WESLEY MCCOTTER, 2014 All Rights Reserved © Copyright by SEAN WESLEY MCCOTTER, 2014 All Rights Reserved To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the thesis of SEAN WESLEY MCCOTTER find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. Lori M. Carris, Ph.D., Chair Dorrie Main, Ph.D. Patricia Okubara, Ph.D. Lisa A. Castlebury, Ph. D. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The research presented in this thesis could not have been carried out without the expertise and cooperation of others in the scientific community. Significant contributions were made by colleagues here at Washington State University, at the United States Department of Agriculture and at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. I would like to start by thanking my committee members Dr. Lori Carris, Dr. Lisa Castlebury, Dr. Pat Okubara and Dr. Dorrie Main, who provided guidance on procedure, feedback on my research as well as contacts and laboratory resources. Dr. André Lévesque of AAFC initially alerted me to the prospect of collaboration with other AAFC Tilletia researchers and placed me in contact with Dr. Sarah Hambleton, whose lab sequenced four out of five strains of Tilletia used in this study (CSSP CRTI 09-462RD). Dr. Prasad Kesanakurti and Jeff Cullis coordinated my access to AAFC’s genome and transcriptome data for these species. -
A Phylogenetic Re-Evaluation of Phyllosticta (Botryosphaeriales)
available online at www.studiesinmycology.org STUDIES IN MYCOLOGY 76: 1–29. A phylogenetic re-evaluation of Phyllosticta (Botryosphaeriales) S. Wikee1,2, L. Lombard3, C. Nakashima4, K. Motohashi5, E. Chukeatirote1,2, R. Cheewangkoon6, E.H.C. McKenzie7, K.D. Hyde1,2*, and P.W. Crous3,8,9 1School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiangrai 57100, Thailand; 2Institute of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiangrai 57100, Thailand; 3CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands; 4Graduate School of Bioresources, Mie University, Kurima-machiya 1577, Tsu, Mie 514-8507, Japan; 5Electron Microscope Center, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Sakuragaoka 1-1-1, Setagaya, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan; 6Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand; 7Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland 1142, New Zealand; 8Microbiology, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands; 9Wageningen University and Research Centre (WUR), Laboratory of Phytopathology, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands *Correspondence: K.D. Hyde, [email protected] Abstract: Phyllosticta is a geographically widespread genus of plant pathogenic fungi with a diverse host range. This study redefines Phyllosticta, and shows that it clusters sister to the Botryosphaeriaceae (Botryosphaeriales, Dothideomycetes), for which the older family name Phyllostictaceae is resurrected. In moving to a unit nomenclature for fungi, the generic name Phyllosticta was chosen over Guignardia in previous studies, an approach that we support here. We use a multigene DNA dataset of the ITS, LSU, ACT, TEF and GPDH gene regions to investigate 129 isolates of Phyllosticta, representing about 170 species names, many of which are shown to be synonyms of the ubiquitous endophyte P. -
Notes, Outline and Divergence Times of Basidiomycota
Fungal Diversity (2019) 99:105–367 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,- volV) Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota 1,2,3 1,4 3 5 5 Mao-Qiang He • Rui-Lin Zhao • Kevin D. Hyde • Dominik Begerow • Martin Kemler • 6 7 8,9 10 11 Andrey Yurkov • Eric H. C. McKenzie • Olivier Raspe´ • Makoto Kakishima • Santiago Sa´nchez-Ramı´rez • 12 13 14 15 16 Else C. Vellinga • Roy Halling • Viktor Papp • Ivan V. Zmitrovich • Bart Buyck • 8,9 3 17 18 1 Damien Ertz • Nalin N. Wijayawardene • Bao-Kai Cui • Nathan Schoutteten • Xin-Zhan Liu • 19 1 1,3 1 1 1 Tai-Hui Li • Yi-Jian Yao • Xin-Yu Zhu • An-Qi Liu • Guo-Jie Li • Ming-Zhe Zhang • 1 1 20 21,22 23 Zhi-Lin Ling • Bin Cao • Vladimı´r Antonı´n • Teun Boekhout • Bianca Denise Barbosa da Silva • 18 24 25 26 27 Eske De Crop • Cony Decock • Ba´lint Dima • Arun Kumar Dutta • Jack W. Fell • 28 29 30 31 Jo´ zsef Geml • Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad • Admir J. Giachini • Tatiana B. Gibertoni • 32 33,34 17 35 Sergio P. Gorjo´ n • Danny Haelewaters • Shuang-Hui He • Brendan P. Hodkinson • 36 37 38 39 40,41 Egon Horak • Tamotsu Hoshino • Alfredo Justo • Young Woon Lim • Nelson Menolli Jr. • 42 43,44 45 46 47 Armin Mesˇic´ • Jean-Marc Moncalvo • Gregory M. Mueller • La´szlo´ G. Nagy • R. Henrik Nilsson • 48 48 49 2 Machiel Noordeloos • Jorinde Nuytinck • Takamichi Orihara • Cheewangkoon Ratchadawan • 50,51 52 53 Mario Rajchenberg • Alexandre G. -
DP 4: Tilletia Indica Mitra INTERNATIONAL STANDARD for PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES PHYTOSANITARY for STANDARD INTERNATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOLS
ISPM 27 27 ANNEX 4 ENG DP 4: Tilletia indica Mitra INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES PHYTOSANITARY FOR STANDARD INTERNATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOLS Produced by the Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) This page is intentionally left blank This diagnostic protocol was adopted by the Standards Committee on behalf of the Commission on Phytosanitary Measures in January 2014. The annex is a prescriptive part of ISPM 27. ISPM 27 Diagnostic protocols for regulated pests DP 4: Tilletia indica Mitra Adopted 2014; published 2016 CONTENTS 1. Pest Information ............................................................................................................................... 2 2. Taxonomic Information .................................................................................................................... 2 3. Detection ........................................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Examination of seeds/grain ............................................................................................... 3 3.2 Extraction of teliospores from seeds/grain, size-selective sieve wash test ....................... 3 4. Identification ..................................................................................................................................... 4 4.1 Morphology of teliospores ................................................................................................ 4 4.1.1 Morphological -
Five New Records of Smut Fungi (Ustilaginomycotina)
日菌報 62: 57-64,2021 Note 黒穂菌(Ustilaginomycotina)5 種の日本新産記録 田中 栄爾 石川県立大学,〒 921‒8836 石川県野々市市末松 1-308 Five new records of smut fungi( Ustilaginomycotina) in Japan Eiji TANAKA Ishikawa Prefectural University, 1‒308 Suematsu, Nonoichi, Ishikawa 921‒8836, Japan (Accepted for publication: March 18, 2021) Five smut fungi collected in Japan are described here: Pilocintractia fimbristylidicola on Fimbristylis miliacea, Sporisori- um manilense on Sacciolepis indica, Tilletia arundinellae on Arundinella hirta, Tilletia vittata on Oplismenus undulatifolius, and Ustilago phragmitis on Phragmites australis. These species are reported in Japan for the rst time. Besides, Neovossia moliniae on P. australis is described. This is the second record of this smut fungus in Japan. (Japanese Journal of Mycology 62: 57-64, 2021) Key Words―Neovossia, Pilocintractia, Sporisorium, Tilletia, Ustilago Many smut fungi( Basidiomycota, Ustilaginomycoti- glycerol and observed using differential interference con- na) form sori on the flowers of grasses or sedges. Cur- trast microscopy( E-800 or Ni, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). For rently recognized species of smut fungi in Japan have scanning electron microscopic( SEM) study, the spores been summarized by Kakishima( 2016). During a number were xed with vapor from 1% OsO4 in 0.05 M cacodylate of surveys of phytopathogenic fungi on grasses and sedg- buffer at pH7.2 for 2 h then coated with 8 nm thick plati- es, Pilocintractia fimbristylidicola( Ustilaginales, Anthra- num using an ion sputter( E-1010, Hitachi), and observed coideaceae), Sporisorium manilense( Ustilaginales, Usti- using field emission scanning electron microscopy( S- laginaceae), Tilletia arundinellae( Tilletiales, Tilletiaceae), 4700, Hitachi High-Technologies Corp., Tokyo, Japan) as Tilletia vittata( Tilletiaceae), and Ustilago phragmitis shown in a previous study( Tanaka & Honda, 2017). -
El Carbón Del Grano De Arroz En Colombia: Una Revisión
ISSN 0568-3076 agron. 22 (2): 35 - 47, 2014 EL CARBÓN DEL GRANO DE ARROZ EN COLOMBIA: UNA REVISIÓN Lilliana Hoyos-Carvajal*, Alexander Marín Pavas** * Profesora Asociada, Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Medellín, Colombia. Autor para correspondencia: [email protected] ** Estudiante Ingeniería Agronómica, Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Medellín, Colombia. Recibido: enero 22 de 2014 ; aprobado: febrero 13 de 2014 RESUMEN ABSTRACT El carbón del grano de arroz, enfermedad que ataca los KERNEL SMUT OF RICE IN COLOMBIA: granos, se registra en las diferentes zonas productoras de A REVIEW arroz en el mundo; causando pérdidas económicas que oscilan entre el 1 y el 40 % de la producción; su daño puede ocurrir, incluso, a bajos niveles de la enfermedad, en Kernel smut of rice, a disease that attacks the grains, is procesos de parbolizado en el cual las teliosporas de este registered in different rice producing areas in the world patógeno manchan el grano y de esta forma no es apto para causing economic losses ranging from 1 to 40% of the consumo humano. Al presente existe controversia sobre la production. Its damage can occur even at low levels of identidad de la especie que causa el carbón del arroz, pues the disease in parboiling processes in which teliospores of T. horrida y T. barclayana aún siguen siendo tratados como the pathogen stain the grains, and thus make them not fit sinónimos por varios autores y protocolos fitosanitarios. for human consumption. At present there is controversy El debate se encuentra en las evidencias de separaciones about the identity of the species that causes kernel smut en clados obtenidas mediante técnicas enzimáticas y de of rice since T. -
Multigene Phylogeny and Taxonomic Revision of Yeasts and Related Fungi in the Ustilaginomycotina
available online at www.studiesinmycology.org STUDIES IN MYCOLOGY 81: 55–83. Multigene phylogeny and taxonomic revision of yeasts and related fungi in the Ustilaginomycotina Q.-M. Wang1, D. Begerow2, M. Groenewald3, X.-Z. Liu1, B. Theelen3, F.-Y. Bai1,3*, and T. Boekhout1,3,4* 1State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; 2Ruhr-Universit€at Bochum, AG Geobotanik, ND 03/174, Universit€atsstr. 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany; 3CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Yeast Division, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands; 4Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Medical Mycology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China *Correspondence: F.-Y. Bai, [email protected]; T. Boekhout, [email protected] Abstract: The subphylum Ustilaginomycotina (Basidiomycota, Fungi) comprises mainly plant pathogenic fungi (smuts). Some of the lineages possess cultivable uni- cellular stages that are usually classified as yeast or yeast-like species in a largely artificial taxonomic system which is independent from and largely incompatible with that of the smut fungi. Here we performed phylogenetic analyses based on seven genes including three nuclear ribosomal RNA genes and four protein coding genes to address the molecular phylogeny of the ustilaginomycetous yeast species and their filamentous counterparts. Taxonomic revisions were proposed to reflect this phylogeny and to implement the ‘One Fungus = One Name’ principle. The results confirmed that the yeast-containing classes Malasseziomycetes, Moniliellomycetes and Ustilaginomycetes are monophyletic, whereas Exobasidiomycetes in the current sense remains paraphyletic. Four new genera, namely Dirkmeia gen. nov., Kalma- nozyma gen. nov., Golubevia gen. nov. and Robbauera gen. -
Phyllosticta Citricarpa (Mcalpine) Aa on Fruit INTERNATIONAL STANDARD for PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES PHYTOSANITARY for STANDARD INTERNATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOLS
ISPM 27 27 ANNEX 5 ENG DP 5: Phyllosticta citricarpa (McAlpine) Aa on fruit INTERNATIONAL STANDARD FOR PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES PHYTOSANITARY FOR STANDARD INTERNATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOLS Produced by the Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) This page is intentionally left blank This diagnostic protocol was adopted by the Standards Committee on behalf of the Commission on Phytosanitary Measures in August 2014. The annex is a prescriptive part of ISPM 27. ISPM 27 Diagnostic protocols for regulated pests DP 5: Phyllosticta citricarpa (McAlpine) Aa on fruit Adopted 2014; published 2016 CONTENTS 1. Pest Information ............................................................................................................................... 2 2. Taxonomic Information .................................................................................................................... 3 3. Detection ........................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Symptoms on fruit ............................................................................................................. 3 3.2 Symptoms on leaves and twigs ......................................................................................... 4 3.3 Comparison of citrus black spot symptoms with those caused by other organisms or abiotic factors .................................................................................................................... 5 4. -
A Phylogenetic Hypothesis of Ustilaginomycotina Based on Multiple Gene Analyses and Morphological Data1
Mycologia, 98(6), 2006, pp. 906–916. # 2006 by The Mycological Society of America, Lawrence, KS 66044-8897 A phylogenetic hypothesis of Ustilaginomycotina based on multiple gene analyses and morphological data1 Dominik Begerow2 INTRODUCTION Matthias Stoll Ustilaginomycotina is one of the best studied groups Robert Bauer of plant parasitic fungi. Ustilago and Tilletia are well Universita¨t Tu¨ bingen, Lehrstuhl Spezielle Botanik und Mykologie, Auf der Morgenstelle 1, D-72076, Tu¨ bingen, known genera, which contain economically important Germany species (e. g. the barley, wheat, or maize smut fungi; Thomas 1989, Trione 1982, Valverde et al 1995). In addition Ustilago maydis is used widely as a model Abstract: The subphylum Ustilaginomycotina com- organism for plant pathogenesis (Kahmann and prises about 1500 species of basidiomycetous plant Ka¨mper 2004) and it is the first basidiomycetous parasites. They are usually dimorphic, producing plant parasite for which the complete genome is a saprobic haploid yeast phase and a parasitic available (MUMDB http://mips.gsf.de/genre/proj/ dikaryotic hyphal phase. With only a few exceptions ustilago/). Last but not least the phylogeny of the they occur on angiosperms and are found mainly on former smut fungi has been studied thoroughly in the members of the Poaceae and Cyperaceae. Molecular past decade (Bauer et al 1997, 2001a, b, Begerow et al methods recently have shown that anamorphic 1997, 2000, 2002a, b, 2004a, Castlebury et al 2005, species such as members of Malassezia or Tilletiopsis Stoll et al 2003, 2005). should be included in this group. Here we present the Beginning with Tulasne and Tulasne (1847) the most recent consensus as to the phylogeny of this smut fungi traditionally have been divided into the group and discuss its relevant characteristics. -
Phyllosticta Citricarpa and Sister Species of Global Importance to Citrus
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title Phyllosticta citricarpa and sister species of global importance to Citrus. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4jk1b6m1 Journal Molecular plant pathology, 20(12) ISSN 1464-6722 Authors Guarnaccia, Vladimiro Gehrmann, Thies Silva-Junior, Geraldo J et al. Publication Date 2019-12-01 DOI 10.1111/mpp.12861 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY (2019) 20(12), 1619–1635 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12861 Pathogen profile Phyllosticta citricarpa and sister species of global importance to Citrus VLADIMIRO GUARNACCIA 1,2,*, THIES GEHRMANN1, GERALDO J. SILVA-JUNIOR3, PAUL H. FOURIE4,5, SAJEET HARIDAS6, DUONG VU1, JOSEPH SPATAFORA7, FRANCIS M. MARTIN8, VINCENT ROBERT1, IGOR V. GRIGORIEV6, JOHANNES Z. GROENEWALD1 AND PEDRO W. CROUS1 1 Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands 2 DiSAFA, University of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095, Grugliasco, TO Italy 3 Fund for Citrus Protection, Fundecitrus, Araraquara, São Paulo Brazil 4 Citrus Research International, P.O. Box 28, Nelspruit, 1200, South Africa 5 Department of Plant Pathology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa 6 US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Dr., Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA 7 Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Cordley Hall 2082, Corvallis, 97331-2902, OR USA 8 Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR INRA-Université de Lorraine “Interaction Arbres/Microorganismes”, Champenoux, France SUMMARY Disease symptoms: P. citricarpa causes diverse symptoms Several Phyllosticta species are known as pathogens of Citrus such as hard spot, virulent spot, false melanose and freckle spot spp., and are responsible for various disease symptoms includ- on fruit, and necrotic lesions on leaves and twigs. -
PM 7/017 (3) Phyllosticta Citricarpa (Formerly Guignardia Citricarpa)
Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin (2020) 50 (3), 440–461 ISSN 0250-8052. DOI: 10.1111/epp.12700 European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization Organisation Europe´enne et Me´diterrane´enne pour la Protection des Plantes PM 7/017(3) Diagnostics PM 7/017 (3) Phyllosticta citricarpa (formerly Guignardia citricarpa) Specific scope Specific approval and amendment This Standard describes a diagnostic protocol for First approved in 2002–09. First revision 2009–09. Second Phyllosticta citricarpa.1 revision 2020–07. This Standard should be used in conjunction with PM 7/76 This revision was initially prepared taking into account Use of EPPO diagnostic protocols. the IPPC Diagnostic Protocol adopted in 2014 (Appendix 5 to ISPM 27, Phyllosticta citricarpa (McAlpine) van der Aa on fruit). However, the EPPO Diagnostic Standard includes other tests developed after the adoption of the IPPC diag- nostic protocol and covers additional matrices than fruits. It also includes new species described since the adoption of the IPPC protocol. infections may cause premature fruit drop (Kotze, 2000). 1. Introduction Some losses due to fruit drop occur in years favourable for Phyllosticta citricarpa (McAlpine) Aa, the causal agent of disease development and when fruit is held on the trees “citrus black spot” disease, is a leaf-spotting and fruit-blemish- past peak maturity (CABI, 2011). In addition, latently ing fungus affecting Citrus, Poncirus and Fortunella and their infected (asymptomatic) fruit at harvest may still develop hybrids. Except for C. aurantium and its hybrids and symptoms during transport or storage (Kotze, 1996). C. latifolia, all commercially grown Citrus species are suscep- The epidemiology of citrus black spot is influenced by tible to the disease (Kotze, 2000; Aguilar-Vildoso et al., the availability of inoculum, the occurrence of environmen- 2002).