DOCSLIB.ORG

Towards Incorporating Anamorphic Fungi in a Natural Classification – Checklist and Notes for 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Towards Incorporating Anamorphic Fungi in a Natural Classification – Checklist and Notes for 2010 Mycosphere Towards incorporating anamorphic fungi in a natural classification – checklist and notes for 2010 Hyde KD1,2*, McKenzie EHC3 and KoKo TW1 1School of Mae Fah Luang University, 333 M. 1. T. Tasud Muang District, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand. 2Botany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 3Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand. Hyde KD, McKenzie EHC, KoKo TW. (2011). Towards incorporating anamorphic fungi in a natural classification – checklist and notes for 2010. Mycosphere 2(1), 1–88. A complilation of anamorphic names for both Ascomycota and Basidiomycota is provided which compises 2873 genera. The genera are listed against a backbone of teleomorphic relationships where known. The study reveals that 699 genera and 94 anamorph-like genera are linked to teleomorphic genera names, 447 genera (one anamorph-like genus) are linked to teleomorph families, orders or classes, while for more than 1728 (60.15%) genera no teleomorph link is known. Key words –Asexual fungi – life cycle – sexual fungi – taxonomy Article Information Received 4 February 2011 Accepted 7 February 2011 Published online 10 March 2011 *Corresponding author: Hyde KD – e-mail – [email protected] Introduction et al. 2010), these genera will be classified in The purpose of the present paper is to families, orders and classes of Ascomycota and collate the knowledge of anamorphic fungi in Basidiomycota. This will result in more and relationship to their teleomorphic states. It more anamorphic states being described and attempts to classify the anamorphic genera in a illustrated without being given formal names natural biological framework for the Ascomy- and therefore it is important to have a forum cota based on the Outline of Ascomycota 2009 where anamorphic data can be brought to the (Lumbsch & Huhndorf 2010) and for the attention of researchers. It is hoped that this Basidiomycota based on Kirk et al. (2008). The compilation will facilitate the move towards present paper has used data from the Dic- one fungus one name as advocated by many tionary of the Fungi (Kirk et al. 2008), Index mycologists (Shenoy et al. 2007, 2010). By Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org/na placing all anamorphic genera against the mes/Names.asp), Species Fungorum (http:// backbone classification of the sexual genera it www.speciesfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp) will be possible to establish 1) what are the and Index of Fungi (Anon. 2009–2010) as well anamorphs of various species, genera, families as literature published in 2009 and 2010. or orders, 2) which genera have no information, There is now debate in the systematics 3) which are the older or more commonly used community to place one name on a fungus names for each genus, and 4) illustrate the species as opposed to the present system redundancy of the dual classification system. (especially in Ascomycota) of naming both This compilation also provides a single sexual and asexual morphs (Samuels et al. place where anamorph connections can be 2009). Also, as more and more strains of accessed and critically scrutinized so that a anamorphic genera are sequenced (eg. Shenoy stable and reliable system can be developed 1 based on published data. We do not claim that anamorphic genus. Such records can be located this compilation is complete or definitive; how- by searching the genus throughout the list for ever, it provides a forum for displaying data repeat entries. The synonyms of genera are not and can be added to or changed as more data listed as they can be easily found in Index becomes available or errors are discovered. In Fungorum. future issues we will explore various connec- We encourage colleagues to inform us of tions and provide more data. any missing entries, new data or misunder- In the long term it will be desirable if standings, which will be updated in future Myconet (http://www.fieldmuseum.org/myco compilations. We would also invite experts of net) is merged with this document, however, specific groups to contribute to future compi- this should occur at some time in the future, lations on their specific group(s) of interest and when more data is available. encourage reviews or illustrated accounts of families, orders or other groups relating to Material and methods teleomorph and anamorph links. Reviews of The overall scheme for the classification anamorphic genera with sections or series, such of the anamorphic fungi follows the Outline of as Aspergillus, Penicillium and Verticillium, Ascomycota 2009 (Lumbsch & Huhndorf the powdery mildews, many of the yeasts and 2010), with additional data on anamorphic yeast-like genera and the anamorphic smuts Basidiomycota from Kirk et al. (2008). This and rusts are particularly needed. Similarly the scheme is chosen as the schemes in the lichenized ascomycete anamorphic states are Dictionary of the Fungi, Index Fungorum, and poorly documented. MycoBank differ to a greater or lesser extent As there is a move towards using one and it was felt wise to follow what the authors name for both the sexual and asexual states of a consider is an admirable attempt to keep fungus we also encourage authors to submit abreast of the current literarure as is routinely articles or opinions concerning the use of one carried out in the Outline of Ascomycota. This name. This might be in the form of a general compilation also annotates changes made in the critic, arguments for or against using one name, form of notes on anamorphic fungi (marked or an article that specifically addresses an with an asterisk after the entry, with notes in individual group or genus with arguments for the later “Notes” section) so that changes can adopting the anamorph, teleomorph or both easily be followed; this is not always true of names. the available databases. Anamorphic genera or ‘-like’ genera are Index to Ascomycota listed in bold under the appropriate fungal classification and the link to a teleomorph Phylum ASCOMYCOTA Caval-Sm. genus given where found. Dubious genera are Subphylum TAPHRINOMYCOTINA O.E. excluded but can be added if they are later Erikss. & Winka found to be good genera. Fossil fungi are also Class Taphrinomycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka excluded as it would be impossible with Taphrinales Gäum. & C.W. Dodge present techniques available to provide a na- Protomycetaceae Gray tural classification for them. A question mark Saitoella Goto, Sugiy., Hamam. & Komag. before the entry means that its placement in 1987 that family or order is not fully established and generally follows Lumbsch & Huhndorf (2010). Taphrinaceae Gäum. A question mark before anamorph means it is Lalaria R.T. Moore 1990, anamorphic not clear that this is the anamorph of this genus, Taphrina Fr. 1815 although there are many cases without a ques- tion mark where the link has not equivocally Subphylum SACHAROMYCOTINA O.E. been proven. An asterisk (*) following the Erikss. & Winka names indicates an entry in the “Notes” section. In many genus records in Index Fungo- Class Saccharomycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka rum the species is linked to more than one Saccharomycetales Kudrjanzev 2 Mycosphere Dipodascaceae Engl. & E. Gilg Trichomonascaceae Kurtzman & Robnett ?Candida Berkhout 1923, anamorphic Blastobotrys Klopotek 1967, anamorphic Sporopachydermia Rodr. Mir. 1978 Trichomonascus H.S. Jacks. 1948 Galactomyces Redhead & Malloch 1977, Candida Berkhout 1923, ?anamorphic anamorphic Dipodascus Lagerh. 1892 Zygoascus M.T. Sm. 1986 Geotrichum Link 1809, anamorphic Dipo- dascus Lagerh. 1892 Saccharomycetales, genera incertae sedis Geotrichum-like, anamorphic Basidioas- Aciculoconidium D.S. King & S.C. Jong cus Matsush. 2003 1976 Saprochaete Coker & Shanor 1939, ana- Botryozyma Shann & M.T. Sm. 1992, morphic Magnusiomyces Zender 1926 anamorphic Ascobotryozyma J. Kerri- gan, M.T. Sm. & J.D. Rogers 2001 Endomycetaceae J. Schröt. Candida Berkhout 1923, anamorphic Fusidium Link 1809, possibly anamorphic Starmerella C.A. Rosa & Lachance Ascocephalophora K. Matsush. & 1998 Matsush. 1995 Cicadomyces Šulc 1911 Macrorhabdus Tomasz., Logan, Snowden, Lipomycetaceae E.K. Novák & Zsolt Kurtzman & Phalen 2003 Myxozyma Van der Walt, Weijman & Arx Oosporidium Stautz 1931 1981 Pseudomycoderma H. Will 1916 Schizoblastosporion Cif. 1930 Metschnikowiaceae T. Kamienski Trigonopsis Schachner 1929 Candida Berkhout 1923, anamorphic Saccharomycetes, genera incertae sedis Clavispora Rodr. Mir. 1979 and Selenotila Lagerh. 1892 Metschnikowia T. Kamienski 1899 Selenozyma Yarrow 1977 Pichiaceae Zender Subphylum PEZIZOMYCOTINA O.E. Erikss. Brettanomyces N.H. Claussen ex Custers & Winka 1940, anamorphic Dekkera Van der Class Arthoniomycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka Walt 1964 Arthoniales Henssen ex D. Hawksw. & O.E. Eeniella M.T. Sm., Bat. Vegte & Scheffers Erikss. 1981, anamorphic Dekkera Van der Arthoniaceae Reichenb. ex Reichenb. Walt Helicobolomyces Matzer 1995, anamor- Enantiothamnus Pinoy 1911 phic Arthonia Ach. 1806 Hyphopichia Arx & Van der Walt 1976 Septocyta Petr. 1927, ?anamorphic Artho- nia Ach. 1806 Saccharomycetaceae G. Winter Subhysteropycnis Wedin & Hafellner 1998, Candida Berkhout 1923, ?anamorphic anamorphic Arthonia Ach. 1806 Ogataea Y. Yamada, K. Maeda & Mikata 1994, Lodderomyces Van der Roccellaceae Chevall. Walt 1966 and Spathaspora N.H. Sporhaplus H.B.P. Upadhyay 1964, ana- Nguyen, S.O. Suh & M. Blackw. 2006 morphic Mazosia A. Massal 1854 Saccharomycodaceae Kudrjanzev Class Dothideomycetes sensu O.E. Erikss. & Candida Berkhout 1923, anamorphic Winka Lodderomyces
Load more

Recommended publications
  • <I>Stilbosporaceae</I>
    Persoonia 33, 2014: 61–82 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158514X684212 Stilbosporaceae resurrected: generic reclassification and speciation H. Voglmayr1, W.M. Jaklitsch1 Key words Abstract Following the abolishment of dual nomenclature, Stilbospora is recognised as having priority over Prosthecium. The type species of Stilbospora, S. macrosperma, is the correct name for P. ellipsosporum, the type Alnecium species of Prosthecium. The closely related genus Stegonsporium is maintained as distinct from Stilbospora based Calospora on molecular phylogeny, morphology and host range. Stilbospora longicornuta and S. orientalis are described as Calosporella new species from Carpinus betulus and C. orientalis, respectively. They differ from the closely related Stilbospora ITS macrosperma, which also occurs on Carpinus, by longer, tapering gelatinous ascospore appendages and by dis- LSU tinct LSU, ITS rDNA, rpb2 and tef1 sequences. The asexual morphs of Stilbospora macrosperma, S. longicornuta molecular phylogeny and S. orientalis are morphologically indistinguishable; the connection to their sexual morphs is demonstrated by Phaeodiaporthe morphology and DNA sequences of single spore cultures derived from both ascospores and conidia. Both morphs rpb2 of the three Stilbospora species on Carpinus are described and illustrated. Other species previously recognised in systematics Prosthecium, specifically P. acerophilum, P. galeatum and P. opalus, are determined to belong to and are formally tef1 transferred to Stegonsporium. Isolates previously recognised as Stegonsporium pyriforme (syn. Prosthecium pyri­ forme) are determined to consist of three phylogenetically distinct lineages by rpb2 and tef1 sequence data, two of which are described as new species (S. protopyriforme, S. pseudopyriforme). Stegonsporium pyriforme is lectotypified and this species and Stilbospora macrosperma are epitypified.
    [Show full text]
  • 10-ELS-OXF Kurtzman1610423 CH002 7..20
    Part II Importance of Yeasts Kurtzman 978-0-444-52149-1 00002 Kurtzman 978-0-444-52149-1 00002 Chapter 2 c0002 Yeasts Pathogenic to Humans Chester R. Cooper, Jr. regularly encounter the organisms described below. In fact, many s0010 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE MEDICALLY medical mycologists spend entire careers without direct clinical expo- IMPORTANT YEASTS sure to many of these fungi. Rather, the purpose of this review is to enlighten the non-medical mycologist as to the diversity of yeast and p0010 Prior to global emergence of the human immunodeficiency virus mold species regularly associated with human and animal disease (HIV), which is the causative agent of acquired immunodeficiency that also, at least in part, present a unicellular mode of growth in vivo. syndrome (AIDS), approximately 200 fungal pathogens were recog- The following descriptions present a concise overview of the key p0025 nized from among the more than 100,000 then-known fungal spe- biological and clinical features of these fungi. Where appropriate, refer- cies (Kwon-Chung and Bennett 1992, Rippon 1988). About 50 of ences to recent reviews of particular disease agents and their patholo- these species were regularly associated with fungal disease (myco- gies are provided. For a global perspective of fungal diseases, including sis). Since then, there has been a concurrent dramatic increase in in-depth clinical discussions of specific pathologies, diagnoses, and both the number of known fungal species and the incidence of treatments, the reader is referred to several outstanding and recently mycoses that they cause. Moreover, the spectrum of pathogenic fungi published texts (Anaissie et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Genus Arachnomyces and Its Anamorphs and the Establishment of Arachnomycetales, a New Eurotiomycete Order in the Ascomycota
    STUDIES IN MYCOLOGY 47: 131-139, 2002 Phylogeny of the genus Arachnomyces and its anamorphs and the establishment of Arachnomycetales, a new eurotiomycete order in the Ascomycota 1, 2 1* 3 2 C. F. C. Gibas , L. Sigler , R. C. Summerbell and R. S. Currah 1University of Alberta Microfungus Collection and Herbarium, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; 3Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands Abstract: Arachnomyces is a genus of cleistothecial ascomycetes that has morphological similarities to the Onygenaceae and the Gymnoascaceae but is not accommodated well in either taxon. The phylogeny of the genus and its related anamorphs was studied using nuclear SSU rDNA gene sequences. Partial sequences were determined from ex-type cultures representing A. minimus, A. nodosetosus (anamorph Onychocola canadensis), A. kanei (anamorph O. kanei) and A. gracilis (anamorph Malbranchea sp.) and aligned together with published sequences of onygenalean and other ascomycetes. Phylogenetic analysis based on maximum parsimony showed that Arachnomyces is monophyletic, that it includes the hyphomycete Malbranchea sclerotica, and it forms a distinct lineage within the Eurotiomycetes. Based on molecular and morphological data, we propose the new order Arachnomycetales and a new family Arachnomycetaceae. All known anamorphs in this lineage are arthroconidial and have been placed either in Onychocola (A. nodosetosus, A. kanei) or in Malbranchea (A. gracilis). Onychocola is considered appropriate for disposition of the arthroconidial states of Arachnomyces and thus Malbranchea sclerotica and the unnamed anamorph of A. gracilis are redisposed as Onychocola sclerotica comb. nov. and O. gracilis sp. nov. Keywords: Eurotiomycetes, Arachnomycetales, Arachnomycetaceae, Arachnomyces, Onychocola, Malbranchea sclerotica, SSU rDNA, Ascomycota, phylogeny Introduction described from herbivore dung maintained in damp chambers (Singh & Mukerji, 1978; Mukerji, pers.
    [Show full text]
  • Fungal Planet Description Sheets: 716–784 By: P.W
    Fungal Planet description sheets: 716–784 By: P.W. Crous, M.J. Wingfield, T.I. Burgess, G.E.St.J. Hardy, J. Gené, J. Guarro, I.G. Baseia, D. García, L.F.P. Gusmão, C.M. Souza-Motta, R. Thangavel, S. Adamčík, A. Barili, C.W. Barnes, J.D.P. Bezerra, J.J. Bordallo, J.F. Cano-Lira, R.J.V. de Oliveira, E. Ercole, V. Hubka, I. Iturrieta-González, A. Kubátová, M.P. Martín, P.-A. Moreau, A. Morte, M.E. Ordoñez, A. Rodríguez, A.M. Stchigel, A. Vizzini, J. Abdollahzadeh, V.P. Abreu, K. Adamčíková, G.M.R. Albuquerque, A.V. Alexandrova, E. Álvarez Duarte, C. Armstrong-Cho, S. Banniza, R.N. Barbosa, J.-M. Bellanger, J.L. Bezerra, T.S. Cabral, M. Caboň, E. Caicedo, T. Cantillo, A.J. Carnegie, L.T. Carmo, R.F. Castañeda-Ruiz, C.R. Clement, A. Čmoková, L.B. Conceição, R.H.S.F. Cruz, U. Damm, B.D.B. da Silva, G.A. da Silva, R.M.F. da Silva, A.L.C.M. de A. Santiago, L.F. de Oliveira, C.A.F. de Souza, F. Déniel, B. Dima, G. Dong, J. Edwards, C.R. Félix, J. Fournier, T.B. Gibertoni, K. Hosaka, T. Iturriaga, M. Jadan, J.-L. Jany, Ž. Jurjević, M. Kolařík, I. Kušan, M.F. Landell, T.R. Leite Cordeiro, D.X. Lima, M. Loizides, S. Luo, A.R. Machado, H. Madrid, O.M.C. Magalhães, P. Marinho, N. Matočec, A. Mešić, A.N. Miller, O.V. Morozova, R.P. Neves, K. Nonaka, A. Nováková, N.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Morphology of Premilcurensis Gen
    Phytotaxa 236 (1): 040–052 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.236.1.3 Phylogeny and morphology of Premilcurensis gen. nov. (Pleosporales) from stems of Senecio in Italy SAOWALUCK TIBPROMMA1,2,3,4,5, ITTHAYAKORN PROMPUTTHA6, RUNGTIWA PHOOKAMSAK1,2,3,4, SARANYAPHAT BOONMEE2, ERIO CAMPORESI7, JUN-BO YANG1,2, ALI H. BHAKALI8, ERIC H. C. MCKENZIE9 & KEVIN D. HYDE1,2,4,5,8 1Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, People’s Republic of China 2Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand 3School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand 4World Agroforestry Centre, East and Central Asia, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, P. R. China 5Mushroom Research Foundation, 128 M.3 Ban Pa Deng T. Pa Pae, A. Mae Taeng, Chiang Mai 50150, Thailand 6Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand 7A.M.B. Gruppo Micologico Forlivese “Antonio Cicognani”, Via Roma 18, Forlì, Italy; A.M.B. Circolo Micologico “Giovanni Carini”, C.P. 314, Brescia, Italy; Società per gli Studi Naturalistici della Romagna, C.P. 144, Bagnacavallo (RA), Italy 8Botany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, KSA 11442, Saudi Arabia 9Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand *Corresponding author: Dr. Itthayakorn Promputtha, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Systematics of the Marine Dothideomycetes
    available online at www.studiesinmycology.org StudieS in Mycology 64: 155–173. 2009. doi:10.3114/sim.2009.64.09 Molecular systematics of the marine Dothideomycetes S. Suetrong1, 2, C.L. Schoch3, J.W. Spatafora4, J. Kohlmeyer5, B. Volkmann-Kohlmeyer5, J. Sakayaroj2, S. Phongpaichit1, K. Tanaka6, K. Hirayama6 and E.B.G. Jones2* 1Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90112, Thailand; 2Bioresources Technology Unit, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC), 113 Thailand Science Park, Paholyothin Road, Khlong 1, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand; 3National Center for Biothechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, MSC 6510, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-6510, U.S.A.; 4Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 97331, U.S.A.; 5Institute of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557, U.S.A.; 6Faculty of Agriculture & Life Sciences, Hirosaki University, Bunkyo-cho 3, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8561, Japan *Correspondence: E.B. Gareth Jones, [email protected] Abstract: Phylogenetic analyses of four nuclear genes, namely the large and small subunits of the nuclear ribosomal RNA, transcription elongation factor 1-alpha and the second largest RNA polymerase II subunit, established that the ecological group of marine bitunicate ascomycetes has representatives in the orders Capnodiales, Hysteriales, Jahnulales, Mytilinidiales, Patellariales and Pleosporales. Most of the fungi sequenced were intertidal mangrove taxa and belong to members of 12 families in the Pleosporales: Aigialaceae, Didymellaceae, Leptosphaeriaceae, Lenthitheciaceae, Lophiostomataceae, Massarinaceae, Montagnulaceae, Morosphaeriaceae, Phaeosphaeriaceae, Pleosporaceae, Testudinaceae and Trematosphaeriaceae. Two new families are described: Aigialaceae and Morosphaeriaceae, and three new genera proposed: Halomassarina, Morosphaeria and Rimora.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Classification of Leotiomycetes
    Mycosphere 10(1): 310–489 (2019) www.mycosphere.org ISSN 2077 7019 Article Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/7 Preliminary classification of Leotiomycetes Ekanayaka AH1,2, Hyde KD1,2, Gentekaki E2,3, McKenzie EHC4, Zhao Q1,*, Bulgakov TS5, Camporesi E6,7 1Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China 2Center of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand 3School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand 4Landcare Research Manaaki Whenua, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand 5Russian Research Institute of Floriculture and Subtropical Crops, 2/28 Yana Fabritsiusa Street, Sochi 354002, Krasnodar region, Russia 6A.M.B. Gruppo Micologico Forlivese “Antonio Cicognani”, Via Roma 18, Forlì, Italy. 7A.M.B. Circolo Micologico “Giovanni Carini”, C.P. 314 Brescia, Italy. Ekanayaka AH, Hyde KD, Gentekaki E, McKenzie EHC, Zhao Q, Bulgakov TS, Camporesi E 2019 – Preliminary classification of Leotiomycetes. Mycosphere 10(1), 310–489, Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/7 Abstract Leotiomycetes is regarded as the inoperculate class of discomycetes within the phylum Ascomycota. Taxa are mainly characterized by asci with a simple pore blueing in Melzer’s reagent, although some taxa have lost this character. The monophyly of this class has been verified in several recent molecular studies. However, circumscription of the orders, families and generic level delimitation are still unsettled. This paper provides a modified backbone tree for the class Leotiomycetes based on phylogenetic analysis of combined ITS, LSU, SSU, TEF, and RPB2 loci. In the phylogenetic analysis, Leotiomycetes separates into 19 clades, which can be recognized as orders and order-level clades.
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains
    United States Department of Agriculture Diseases of Trees in the Great Plains Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Service Research Station Report RMRS-GTR-335 November 2016 Bergdahl, Aaron D.; Hill, Alison, tech. coords. 2016. Diseases of trees in the Great Plains. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-335. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 229 p. Abstract Hosts, distribution, symptoms and signs, disease cycle, and management strategies are described for 84 hardwood and 32 conifer diseases in 56 chapters. Color illustrations are provided to aid in accurate diagnosis. A glossary of technical terms and indexes to hosts and pathogens also are included. Keywords: Tree diseases, forest pathology, Great Plains, forest and tree health, windbreaks. Cover photos by: James A. Walla (top left), Laurie J. Stepanek (top right), David Leatherman (middle left), Aaron D. Bergdahl (middle right), James T. Blodgett (bottom left) and Laurie J. Stepanek (bottom right). To learn more about RMRS publications or search our online titles: www.fs.fed.us/rm/publications www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/ Background This technical report provides a guide to assist arborists, landowners, woody plant pest management specialists, foresters, and plant pathologists in the diagnosis and control of tree diseases encountered in the Great Plains. It contains 56 chapters on tree diseases prepared by 27 authors, and emphasizes disease situations as observed in the 10 states of the Great Plains: Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. The need for an updated tree disease guide for the Great Plains has been recog- nized for some time and an account of the history of this publication is provided here.
    [Show full text]
  • Crittendenia Gen. Nov., a New Lichenicolous Lineage in the Agaricostilbomycetes (Pucciniomycotina), and a Review of the Biology
    The Lichenologist (2021), 53, 103–116 doi:10.1017/S002428292000033X Standard Paper Crittendenia gen. nov., a new lichenicolous lineage in the Agaricostilbomycetes (Pucciniomycotina), and a review of the biology, phylogeny and classification of lichenicolous heterobasidiomycetes Ana M. Millanes1, Paul Diederich2, Martin Westberg3 and Mats Wedin4 1Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, E-28933 Móstoles, Spain; 2Musée national d’histoire naturelle, 25 rue Munster, L-2160 Luxembourg; 3Museum of Evolution, Norbyvägen 16, SE-75236 Uppsala, Sweden and 4Department of Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 50007, SE-10405 Stockholm, Sweden Abstract The lichenicolous ‘heterobasidiomycetes’ belong in the Tremellomycetes (Agaricomycotina) and in the Pucciniomycotina. In this paper, we provide an introduction and review of these lichenicolous taxa, focusing on recent studies and novelties of their classification, phylogeny and evolution. Lichen-inhabiting fungi in the Pucciniomycotina are represented by only a small number of species included in the genera Chionosphaera, Cyphobasidium and Lichenozyma. The phylogenetic position of the lichenicolous representatives of Chionosphaera has, however, never been investigated by molecular methods. Phylogenetic analyses using the nuclear SSU, ITS, and LSU ribosomal DNA mar- kers reveal that the lichenicolous members of Chionosphaera form a monophyletic group in the Pucciniomycotina, distinct from Chionosphaera and outside the Chionosphaeraceae. The new genus Crittendenia is described to accommodate these lichen-inhabiting spe- cies. Crittendenia is characterized by minute synnemata-like basidiomata, the presence of clamp connections and aseptate tubular basidia from which 4–7 spores discharge passively, often in groups. Crittendenia, Cyphobasidium and Lichenozyma are the only lichenicolous lineages known so far in the Pucciniomycotina, whereas Chionosphaera does not include any lichenicolous taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Chrysosporia Infecting Reptiles: Proposal of the New Family Nannizziopsiaceae and Five New Species
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided byPersoonia Diposit Digital 31, de Documents2013: 86–100 de la UAB www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158513X669698 Phylogeny of chrysosporia infecting reptiles: proposal of the new family Nannizziopsiaceae and five new species A.M. Stchigel1, D.A. Sutton2, J.F. Cano-Lira1, F.J. Cabañes3, L. Abarca3, K. Tintelnot4, B.L. Wickes5, D. García1, J. Guarro1 Key words Abstract We have performed a phenotypic and phylogenetic study of a set of fungi, mostly of veterinary origin, morphologically similar to the Chrysosporium asexual morph of Nannizziopsis vriesii (Onygenales, Eurotiomycetidae, animal infections Eurotiomycetes, Ascomycota). The analysis of sequences of the D1-D2 domains of the 28S rDNA, including rep- ascomycetes resentatives of the different families of the Onygenales, revealed that N. vriesii and relatives form a distinct lineage Chrysosporium within that order, which is proposed as the new family Nannizziopsiaceae. The members of this family show the mycoses particular characteristic of causing skin infections in reptiles and producing hyaline, thin- and smooth-walled, small, Nannizziopsiaceae mostly sessile 1-celled conidia and colonies with a pungent skunk-like odour. The phenotypic and multigene study Nannizziopsis results, based on ribosomal ITS region, actin and β-tubulin sequences, demonstrated that some of the fungi included Onygenales in this study were different from the known species of Nannizziopsis and Chrysosporium and are described here as reptiles new. They are N. chlamydospora, N. draconii, N. arthrosporioides, N. pluriseptata and Chrysosporium longisporum. Nannizziopsis chlamydospora is distinguished by producing chlamydospores and by its ability to grow at 5 °C.
    [Show full text]
  • Helicosporous Hyphomycetes from China
    Fungal Diversity Helicosporous hyphomycetes from China Guozhu Zhao1, Xingzhong Liu1 and Wenping Wu2 1Key Laboratory of Systematic Mycology & Lichenology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, PR China 2Novozymes China, Shangdi Zone, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, PR China Zhao, G.Z., Liu, X.Z, and Wu, W.P. (2007). Helicosporous hyphomycetes from China. Fungal Diversity 26: 313-524. Morphological studies of anamorphic taxa with helicospores (helicosporous fungi) were carried out based on observation of specimens collected in China and comparisons with descriptions in the literature. After examination of more than 300 freshly collected specimens and 100 herbarium specimens, we conclude that 71 species in 14 genera are presently known in mainland China, including 9 new species and 2 new combinations. The new species are Helicomyces denticulatus G.Z. Zhao, Xing Z. Liu & W.P. Wu; Helicosporium dentophorum G.Z. Zhao, Xing Z. Liu & W.P. Wu; Helicosporium sympodiophorum G.Z. Zhao, Xing Z. Liu & W.P. Wu; Helicoma hainanense G.Z. Zhao, Xing Z. Liu & W.P. Wu; Helicoma hyalonema G.Z. Zhao, Xing Z. Liu & W.P. Wu; Helicoma latifilum G.Z. Zhao, Xing Z. Liu & W.P. Wu; Helicoma scarabaeiforme G.Z. Zhao; Xenosporium latisporum G.Z. Zhao, Xing Z. Liu & W.P. Wu; Xenosporium ovatum G.Z. Zhao, Xing Z. Liu & W.P. Wu. The new combinations are Helicoma fumosum (P. Karst.) G.Z. Zhao, Xing Z. Liu & W.P. Wu; Helicofilia irregularis (P.M. Kirk) G.Z. Zhao, Xing Z. Liu & W.P. Wu. Another three new combinations, Helicoma casuarinae (Matsush.) G.Z. Zhao, Xing Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes, Outline and Divergence Times of Basidiomycota
    Fungal Diversity (2019) 99:105–367 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,- volV) Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota 1,2,3 1,4 3 5 5 Mao-Qiang He • Rui-Lin Zhao • Kevin D. Hyde • Dominik Begerow • Martin Kemler • 6 7 8,9 10 11 Andrey Yurkov • Eric H. C. McKenzie • Olivier Raspe´ • Makoto Kakishima • Santiago Sa´nchez-Ramı´rez • 12 13 14 15 16 Else C. Vellinga • Roy Halling • Viktor Papp • Ivan V. Zmitrovich • Bart Buyck • 8,9 3 17 18 1 Damien Ertz • Nalin N. Wijayawardene • Bao-Kai Cui • Nathan Schoutteten • Xin-Zhan Liu • 19 1 1,3 1 1 1 Tai-Hui Li • Yi-Jian Yao • Xin-Yu Zhu • An-Qi Liu • Guo-Jie Li • Ming-Zhe Zhang • 1 1 20 21,22 23 Zhi-Lin Ling • Bin Cao • Vladimı´r Antonı´n • Teun Boekhout • Bianca Denise Barbosa da Silva • 18 24 25 26 27 Eske De Crop • Cony Decock • Ba´lint Dima • Arun Kumar Dutta • Jack W. Fell • 28 29 30 31 Jo´ zsef Geml • Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad • Admir J. Giachini • Tatiana B. Gibertoni • 32 33,34 17 35 Sergio P. Gorjo´ n • Danny Haelewaters • Shuang-Hui He • Brendan P. Hodkinson • 36 37 38 39 40,41 Egon Horak • Tamotsu Hoshino • Alfredo Justo • Young Woon Lim • Nelson Menolli Jr. • 42 43,44 45 46 47 Armin Mesˇic´ • Jean-Marc Moncalvo • Gregory M. Mueller • La´szlo´ G. Nagy • R. Henrik Nilsson • 48 48 49 2 Machiel Noordeloos • Jorinde Nuytinck • Takamichi Orihara • Cheewangkoon Ratchadawan • 50,51 52 53 Mario Rajchenberg • Alexandre G.
    [Show full text]