DOCSLIB.ORG

HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD /- /VS£ Index to Photographs Northeast (Railroad) Corridor HAER No. NJ-40 Amtrak Route

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD /- /VS£ Index to Photographs Northeast (Railroad) Corridor HAER No. NJ-40 Amtrak Route 7 ../. HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD /- /VS£ % Index to Photographs Northeast (Railroad) Corridor HAER No. NJ-40 Amtrak route between Pennsylvania/New Jersey State line and New Jersey/New York State line Newark Essex County New Jersey DOCUMENTATION: 37 photographic views organized linearly, beginning at Pennsylvania/New Jersey State line, proceeding northeast to New Jersey/New York State line. Sites are located according to section and milepost designations used by the railroad. Similar aerial photographs were taken of railroad structures along the entire 456-mile route of the Northeast Corridor (NEC). Readers are advised to check NEC entries for the District of Columbia (HAER No. DC^3) , Maryland (HAER No. MD-45), Delaware (HAER No. DE-21), Pennsylvania (HAER No. PA-71) , New York (HAER No. NY-121), Connecticut (HAER No. CT-11) , Rhode Island (HAER No. RI-19), and Massachusetts (HAER No. MA-19). See Field Records for HAER No. DC-3 for strip maps used during aerial reconnaissance and for other references. NOTE: These photographs are U. S. Government materials and not subject to copyright. However, the courtesy of a credit line identifying the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) and the photographer would be appreciated. All photographs were taken by Jack E. Boucher in April 1977. NJ-40-1 BLOOMSBURY STREET BRIDGE. TRENTON, MERCER CO., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 57.61. NJ-40-2 SOUTE CLINTON AVENUE BRIDGE. TRENTON, MERCER CO., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 56.77. NJ-40-3 GENERAL VIEW OF CORRIDOR AROUND TRENTON STATION. TRENTON, MERCER CO., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 56.70. NJ-40-4 NEW BRUNSWICK STATION AND EASTON AVENUE BRIDGE. NEW BRUNSWICK, MIDDLESEX CO., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 31.36. NJ-40-5 NEW BRUNSWICK STATION AND EASTON AVENUE BRIDGE NEW BRUNSWICK, MIDDLESEX CO., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 31.36. NJ-40-6 RARITAN AVENUE ERIDGE. NEW BRUNSWICK, MIDDLESEX CO., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 30.92 NJ-40-7 RARITAN AVENUE BRIDGE. NEW BRUNSWICK, MIDDLESEX CO., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 30.92. Northeast Corridor HAER No. NJ-40 Index to Photographs Page 2 NJ-40-8 Raritan River Bridge. New Brunswick, Middlesex Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 30.92. NJ-40-9 NJ-40-10 Milton Avenue Bridge. Rahway, Union Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 19.41. NJ-40-11 Irving & Cherry Streets Bridge. Rahway, Union Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 19.31. NJ-40-12 NJ-40-13 Main Street Bridge. Rahway, Union Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 19.17. NJ-40-14 Rahway River Bridge. Rahway, Union Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 19.13. NJ-40-15 Staten Island Rapid Transit Bridge. Linden, Union Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 16.28. NJ-40-16 Rahway Avenue Bridge. Elizabeth, Union Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 14.49. NJ-40-17 West Jersey Street Bridge. Elizabeth, Union Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 14.22. NJ-40-18 Central Railroad of New Jersey Bridge. Elizabeth, Union Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 14.22. NJ-40-19 NJ-40-20 Waverly Yard. Newark, Essex Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 12.15. NJ-40-21 NJ-40-22 Haynes Avenue Bridge. Newark, Essex Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 11.39. NJ-40-23 NJ-40-24 General view looking NE up the corridor towards downtown Newark with NJ State Highway ramp to Broad Street in center and Lehigh Valley Railroad Bridge in right corner. Newark, Essex Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 10.35. NJ-40-25 Lehigh Valley Railroad Bridge. Newark, Essex Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 10.56. Northeast Corridor HAER No. NJ-40 Index to Photographs Page 3 NJ-40-26 Lehigh Valley Railroad Bridge. Newark, Essex Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 10.56. NJ-40-27 NJ-40-28 Lafayette Street Bridge. Newark, Essex Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 8.95. NJ-40-29 Central Railroad of New Jersey Bridge. Newark, Essex Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 8.84. NJ-40-30 Pennsylvania Railroad: Newark Station. Newark, Essex Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 8.60. NJ-40-31 NJ-40-32 Passaic River Bridge. Newark, Essex Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 8.50. NJ-40-33 NJ-40-34 NJ-40-35 M NJ-40-36 Hackensack Substation with Hudson River tunnel portal in background. Secaucus, Hudson Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 3.05. NJ-40-37 North (Hudson) River Tunnel west portal. Secaucus, Hudson Co., NJ. Sec. 1401, MP 2.90. Northeast Corridor HAER No. NJ-40 Index to Photographs Page 4 • & ~s? z: OUJ # ^_ & ^V«^ '<T>N UJ ^ <Ps * \$ o ct CO l_J^ t£ H (_ * « LU N co <SN z> o flfl I 1 01 \-CL o u < < UJ it LLI_J CO UJ CO ^ # o I < o & /\ o UJ CO o >- UJ UJ UJ ^ I & A / r < s >- CO UJ Q_ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proposed Restoration of Passenger Rail Service on the West Trenton Line
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
    [Show full text]
  • Highway and Bridge Project Summary by Subregion NJTPA
    NJTPA Transportation Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2020 - 2023 Highway and Bridge Project Summary by Subregion ($ Millions) FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 Page Project DBNUM PHASE COST PHASE COST PHASE COST PHASE COST Bergen County Projects ADDITION TO TIP AS OF 12/7/2020 East Anderson Street Bridge (02C0023A) over the N1801 PE 1.90 DES 3.00 1 Hackensack River ADDITION TO TIP AS OF 2/11/2020 Fifth Avenue Bridge (AKA Fair Lawn Avenue Bridge) over NS9606 CON 17.50 2 Passaic River ADDITION TO TIP AS OF 12/7/2020 Kingsland Avenue, Bridge over Passaic River N1601 PE 1.50 DES 2.50 3 Market Street/Essex Street/Rochelle Avenue 98546 DES 1.00 ROW 0.20 4 REVISION 1 AS OF 2/4/2021 Route 4, Bridge over Palisade Avenue, Windsor Road and 065C ROW 1.50 UTI 3.00 CON 23.10 5 CSX Railroad REPLACED BY REVISION 1 Route 4, Bridge over Palisade Avenue, Windsor Road and 065C ROW 1.50 UTI 3.00 CON 23.10 6 CSX Railroad Route 4, Grand Avenue Bridge 08410 DES 4.00 ROW 1.50 7 Route 4, Hackensack River Bridge 02346 DES 4.50 ROW 1.40 8 REVISION 1 AS OF 2/14/2020 Route 4, Jones Road Bridge 94064 ROW 0.60 CON 22.00 9 REPLACED BY REVISION 1 Route 4, Jones Road Bridge 94064 ROW 0.60 CON 22.00 10 UTI 6.00 Route 4, River Drive to Tunbridge Road 12431A CON 7.35 11 Route 4, Teaneck Road Bridge 93134 CON 13.50 12 Route 17, Bridges over NYS&W RR & RR Spur & Central 14319 DES 3.05 13 Avenue (CR 44) Route 17, Pierrepont Ave to Terrace Ave/Polify Rd (CR 55) 15383 CON 6.10 14 REVISION 1 AS OF 2/14/2020 Route 46, Bergen Boulevard to Main Street 12428 CON 4.10 15 REPLACED BY
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Transit Projects Project Sheet | Portal Bridge Replacement (Portal North)
    Appendix B Capital Plan Project Sheets Regional Transit Projects Project Sheet | Portal Bridge Replacement (Portal North) Description The existing Portal Bridge is a ±960-foot long structure which carries the Existing: Portal Bridge Northeast Corridor (NEC) over the Hackensack River between Newark Penn Station and Secaucus Junction. The existing movable, swing span bridge was constructed in 1910, is 110-years old, and has exceeded its originally intended service life. Due to its age and frequency of use, the movable bridge is costly and difficult to maintain and experiences frequent breakdowns. The two-track bridge creates a bottleneck between the four-track territories to the east and west and requires train speed reductions of 30% which contributes to a decrease in rail service reliability. Given its low vertical clearance to the river, frequent bridge openings are required to accommodate marine traffic. Also, mechanical component malfunctions often cause the bridge to be open for extended periods of time, resulting in frequent, lengthy delays of rail service on the NEC. Additionally, the existing bridge does not have enough capacity to accommodate anticipated future demand. If funded, this project would replace the existing bridge with a higher, more reliable, double track fixed bridge on a new alignment to the north of the existing bridge. The increased vertical profile would eliminate interruptions to rail service due to required bridge openings. The new north bridge would also eliminate speed restrictions, thereby improving Proposed: New Bridge rail operation and capacity across the span. A second, two-track southern bridge, Portal South, is contemplated separately as part of the overall Gateway Program, which when complete would substantially increase operational capacity along this critical length of the NEC.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS
    New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS Table of CONTENTS Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the Author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Federal Highway Administration. New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN Page left blank intentionally. Table of CONTENTS Acknowledgements The New Jersey Department of Transportation’s Division of Multimodal Services thanks the many organizations and individuals for their time and contribution in making this document possible. New Jersey Department of Transportation Nicole Minutoli Paul Truban Genevieve Clifton Himanshu Patel Andrew Ludasi New Jersey Freight Advisory Committee Calvin Edghill, FHWA Keith Skilton, FHWA Anne Strauss-Wieder, NJTPA Jakub Rowinski, NJTPA Ted Dahlburg, DVRPC Mike Ruane, DVRPC Bill Schiavi, SJTPO David Heller, SJTPO Steve Brown, PANYNJ Victoria Farr, PANYNJ Stephanie Molden, PANYNJ Alan Kearns, NJ TRANSIT Steve Mazur, SJTA Rodney Oglesby, CSX Rick Crawford, Norfolk Southern Michael Fesen, Norfolk Southern Jocelyn Hill, Conrail Adam Baginski, Conrail Kelvin MacKavanagh, New Jersey Short Line Railroad Association Brian Hare, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation David Rosenberg, New York State Department of Transportation Consultant Team Jennifer Grenier, WSP Stephen Chiaramonte, WSP Alan Meyers, WSP Carlos Bastida, WSP Joseph Bryan, WSP Sebastian Guerrero, WSP Debbie Hartman, WSP Ruchi Shrivastava, WSP Reed Sibley, WSP Scudder Smith, WSP Scott Parker, Jacobs Engineering Jayne Yost, Jacobs Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Users\Ed\Documents\NRHS 2017\1712 DEC RDG.Wpd
    1935 - 2017 VOLUME48NUMBER12 DISTRICT 2 - CHAPTER WEBSITE: WWW.NRHS1.ORG DECEMBER 2017 MERRY CHRISTMAS FROM THE LANCASTER CHAPTER, INC. N.R.H.S. Lancaster Dispatcher Page 2 December 2017 Holiday Travel THE MUTUAL MAGAZINE - FEBRUARY, 1941 With holiday travel at the highest peak in many years, officers of the Pennsylvania Railroad estimated that during the period from December 13 to December 24, inclusive, the movement over all divisions of the system totalled approximately 2,500,000 passengers, an increase of nearly 20% above 1939. Of this number 2,000,000 rode in coaches and 500,000 in Pullman sleeping and parlor cars. The period covered embraced practically all of the Christmas trek “back home” for family reunions and the heavy travel to Florida, as well as soldiers visiting their people on furloughs from the various encampments throughout the country. In handling this Christmas traffic, 1,314 extra sections and special trains were operated, in addition to many extra cars on regularly scheduled trains. The heaviest day was December 20, when 202 extra sections were required. There were 1,621 extra runs of Pullman cars, including 1,230 sleeping and 391 parlor car movements. To accommodate the tremendous demand for reservations to Florida, 12 extra coach trains, handling more than 4,000 passengers, were operated on PRR WARTIME HOLIDAY POSTER - 1942 four days from New York, Philadelphia and Baltimore, via the Washington COLLECTION OF THE EDITOR gateway, to leading Florida points. These were in addition to the regular daily luxury coach trains - the Silver Meteor, the Champion and the Vacationer - as well as extremely heavy Pullman travel.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Appendix
    TRANSIT APPENDIX Contains: Future NJ TRANSIT Needs The Port Authority’s Interstate Transportation Role Transit Appendix 1 DRAFT Plan 2045: Connecting North Jersey Draft: Future Transit Needs in the NJTPA Region The following analysis of future transit needs was prepared by NJ TRANSIT to inform the development of Plan 2045: Connecting North Jersey. It will guide the NJTPA’s planning and capital programming activities over the next three decades. The foremost concern in projecting future funding needs is predicated on a fully funded state of good repair program for NJ TRANSIT’s existing public transit system. Addressing ongoing and sustained needs related to rehabilitation and basic systems improvements must also constantly progress in order to maintain a statewide public transit network that is responsive to customer needs. With the need to address a focus on state of good repair as a prerequisite, proposed future expansion projects need to be assessed through a series of physical/operational feasibility, environmental, economic and ridership, fiscal and financial analyses. Ongoing operating and maintenance costs associated with proposed projects are a critical component of analysis, as they have a direct impact on NJ TRANSIT’s annual operating budget. Among the future investment needs being considered for longer term capital funding are the following: Capacity Improvements and Transit Service Expansions Additional Trans-Hudson Public Transit Capacity Various studies are underway to examine ways to increase trans-Hudson bus, rail and ferry capacities. Among the major efforts is the Gateway Program, led by Amtrak, focused on preserving and increasing rail capacity between New Jersey and Manhattan. On a broader level, the Federal Railroad Administration is managing the NEC FUTURE effort examining the future needs of the entire Northeast Corridor from Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • How Acela Trainsets Are Made: Inside the Alstom Facility Written by William C
    VOLUME 50 NUMBER 9 DISTRICT 2 - CHAPTER WEBSITE: WWW.NRHS1.ORG SEPTEMBER 2019 HOW ACELA TRAINSETS ARE MADE: INSIDE THE ALSTOM FACILITY WRITTEN BY WILLIAM C. VANTUONO, EDITOR-IN-CHIEF, RAILWAY AGE RAILWAY AGE AT THE ALSTOM MANUFACTURING FACILITY, HORNELL, N.Y., JUNE 12, 2019: Alstom Transportation is building the next generation of high-speed trainsets for Amtrak‘s Northeast Corridor Acela Express service. The new equipment is scheduled to enter service sometime in 2021 between Washington, D.C. and Boston. Amtrak says that this equipment will provide a smoother and more comfortable ride than what it is replacing. Each trainset will have 378 seats, with such amenities as personal power outlets, USB ports and adjustable reading lights. There will be an onboard information system providing real-time information such as location, train speed and conductor announcements. Part of the full ADA accessibility will be spacious restrooms with a 60-inch-diameter turning radius to accommodate people in wheelchairs. Amtrak will be implementing an advance seat reservation system. Food service is described as “contemporary, offering easy access and greater selection.” Twenty-eight of these trainsets are under construction, and Amtrak has created a microsite with photos and facts about the new trainsets. They are much lighter than the current equipment, with 17-metric-ton axle loads. The power cars are constructed of carbon steel; the coaches of aluminum. The trainsets meet FRA Tier III Passenger Equipment Safety Standards; Standards for Alternative Compliance and High-Speed Trainsets. Here is a close look at this equipment under construction. POWER CAR UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
    [Show full text]
  • March 16, 2020 Dear Governor Murphy: Pursuant to Chapter 150
    March 16, 2020 Dear Governor Murphy: Pursuant to Chapter 150, Laws of 1979, I herein transmit the minutes of actions taken at the open session of the regularly scheduled meetings of the New Jersey Transit Corporation, NJ TRANSIT Rail Operations, Inc., NJ TRANSIT Bus Operations, Inc., NJ TRANSIT Mercer, Inc., and NJ TRANSIT Morris, Inc., Board of Directors held on Wednesday, March 11, 2020. Sincerely, Original Signed By Joyce J. Zuczek Board Secretary Enclosures Honorable Philip D. Murphy Governor, State of New Jersey State House Trenton, NJ 08625 NJT Board - 03/11/2020) 56062 Open Session Minutes of the actions taken at the regularly scheduled Board of Directors’ meetings of the New Jersey Transit Corporation, NJ TRANSIT Rail Operations, Inc., NJ TRANSIT Bus Operations, Inc., NJ TRANSIT Mercer, Inc., and NJ TRANSIT Morris, Inc. held at NJ TRANSIT Headquarters, One Penn Plaza East, Newark, New Jersey on Wednesday, March 11, 2020. Board Members Present Diane Gutierrez-Scaccetti, Chair James D. Adams, Board Member (By Telephone) Dini Ajmani, Treasurer’s Representative Sangeeta P. Doshi, Board Member Cedrick T. Fulton, Board Member Bob Gordon, Board Member (Did Not Vote) Raymond W. Greaves, Board Member (Non-Voting) (By Telephone) Richard A. Maroko, Board Member David A. Rasmussen, Board Member (Non-Voting) Brian T. Wilton, Governor’s Representative Staff Present Kevin S. Corbett, President & Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Joyce J. Zuczek, Board Secretary Caroline Vachier, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General Eric R. Daleo, Senior Vice President, Capital Programs Raymond P. Kenny, Senior Vice President & General Manager, Rail Operations William Viqueira, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer Chair Gutierrez-Scaccetti convened the Open Session at 6:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Capital Program Fiscal Year 2003
    Transportation Capital Program Fiscal Year 2003 NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NJ TRANSIT July 1, 2002 Governor James E. McGreevey Commissioner James P. Fox Table of Contents Section I - Introduction Section II - Program by Activity Section III - NJDOT Project/Program Descriptions Section IV - NJ TRANSIT Project/Program Descriptions Section V – Glossary Section I INTRODUCTION NJDOT/NJ TRANSIT Capital Investment Strategy for FY03-FY07 Introduction The Transportation Capital Program for Fiscal Year 2003 describes all the capital investments planned by the New Jersey Department of Transportation and NJ TRANSIT for the fiscal year beginning on July 1, 2002. A multi-year program, as required under federal law, is also under development. Both of these programs are the products of extensive, ongoing participation by the state’s three metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) and a wide variety of stakeholders. Both programs are driven by New Jersey’s transportation goals and objectives, as laid out in this “capital investment strategy” report. “Capital investment strategy” is the term used in New Jersey for a method of linking transportation investments with goals, objectives, and performance measures. New Jersey is a national leader in the development of this approach, which ensures that scarce financial resources are used as efficiently as possible to address our most important needs. This report provides an overview of NJDOT’s and NJ TRANSIT’s capital programs and concludes with a summary of the revenues which are planned to be used to finance these programs. NJDOT Smart Growth NJDOT is committed to making transportation investments that implement Governor McGreevey’s “Smart Growth” initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Capital Program Fiscal Year 2021
    Transportation Capital Program Fiscal Year 2021 NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION October 2020 Governor Lt. Governor Commissioner Sheila Y. Oliver Philip D. Murphy Diane Gutierrez-Scaccetti FISCAL YEAR 2021 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM Table of Contents Section I ................................. Introduction Section II ................................ NJDOT & NJ TRANSIT Project List by Core Mission Section III ............................... NJDOT & NJ TRANSIT Project List by CIS Category Section IV ............................... NJDOT & NJ TRANSIT Project List by Phase of Work Section V ................................ NJDOT Project / Program Descriptions Section VI ............................... NJ TRANSIT Project / Program Descriptions Section VII .............................. NJDOT Five-Year Capital Plan Section VIII ............................. NJ TRANSIT Five-Year Capital Plan Section IX ................................ Glossary SECTIONȱIȱ ȱ INTRODUCTIONȱ FISCAL YEAR 2021 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM Introduction The Transportation Capital Program for State Fiscal Year (SFY) 2021 describes the planned capital investments for the State fiscal year effectively starting July 1, 2020. It represents the annual element of the New Jersey Department of Transportation’s and NJ Transit’s federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Focusing on the Department’s and Transit's Core Mission — safety, infrastructure preservation, mass transit, mobility and congestion relief, and operations
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 129/Friday, July 5, 2002/Notices
    Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 129 / Friday, July 5, 2002 / Notices 44929 the Township of Cranford; (3) the The rail lines qualify for a modified SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is former Rahway Valley Railroad certificate of public convenience and hereby given that the Certificate of Company (Rahway Valley) main line necessity. See Common Carrier Status of Authority issued by the Treasury to the from milepost 0 at the junction with the States, State Agencies and above named Company, under the NJ Transit (Raritan Valley Line) in Instrumentalities and Political United States Code, Title 31, Sections Cranford to milepost 3.9 immediately Subdivisions, Finance Docket No. 9304–9308, to qualify as an acceptable southeast of the Rahway River Bridge in 28990F (ICC served July 16, 1981). surety on Federal bonds is terminated Union, inclusive of the branch line from M&E indicates that, even though effective today. the junction at milepost 3.1 and rehabilitation subsidies are being The Company was last listed as an extending northeast approximately 1.1 provided, the lines will operate without acceptable surety on Federal bonds at 66 miles, and the branch line from the any operating subsidies. M&E also FR 35055, July 2, 2001. junction at milepost 1.1 and extending indicates that there are no preconditions With respect to any bonds, including southeast approximately .50 miles; and for shippers to meet in order to receive continuous bonds, currently in force (4) the former Rahway Valley main line rail service, and that it has obtained with above listed Company, bond- from milepost 3.9 immediately liability insurance coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • NJT Response to OLS Questions
    Department of Transportation and Motor Vehicle Commission FY 2021-2022 Discussion Points NJ Transit 13. Farebox revenue remains heavily depressed since the onset of COVID-19. The FY 2022 Budget in Brief specifies that the pandemic caused NJ Transit train ridership to decline by 75 percent and bus ridership by 50 percent. • Questions: By mode, when are ridership and farebox revenue expected to fully recover from COVID-19? What is the projected revenue gap in FY 2022 and beyond that is attributable to COVID-19? Response: Annual farebox revenue is not expected to return to pre-pandemic norms of nearly $1,000m until at least after 2025, if not later. The projected farebox revenue gap during FY20-FY25 from the FY21 Budget is shown in column “vs. FY21 Budget” in the table below. NJ Transit Corporation Passenger Revenue by Modes ($ in millions) vs. FY21 vs. FY21 Rail Bus Lt. Rail NJT Budget Rail Bus Lt. Rail NJT Budget FY20 - Actual 426.6 294.8 17.6 738.9 (254.8) 73% 76% 75% 74% (26%) FY21 Budget 583.8 386.4 23.5 993.7 - 100% 100% 100% 100% - FY21 - Projected 109.3 144.5 8.3 262.1 (731.6) 19% 37% 35% 26% (74%) FY22 - GBM* 266.6 308.7 15.4 590.7 (403.0) 46% 80% 65% 59% (41%) FY23 - Prelim 398.4 346.2 18.0 762.7 (231.0) 68% 90% 77% 77% (23%) FY24 - Prelim 455.7 360.8 19.6 836.1 (157.5) 78% 93% 83% 84% (16%) FY25 - Prelim 501.9 366.5 20.8 889.2 (104.5) 86% 95% 88% 89% (11%) *Governor’s Budget Message Note: the FY21 Budget listed above was released in early 2020 and does not account for the substantial and significant impacts of the pandemic.
    [Show full text]