<<

International Engagement Survey

ACSA 2017-18 Leadership Committee

Committee Chair: Rebecca O’Neal Dagg ACSA Executive Director: Michael J. Monti, PhD Committee Members: José L.S. Gámez, Barbara Klinkhammer, Branko Kolarevic, Sharon Carter Matthews, Andres Mignucci, Marilys R. Nepomechie

1 International Engagement Survey—Draft Thank you to the 77 American University of Sharjah Tulane University Andrews University Universidad del Turabo schools that responded University of Arizona to the survey. Following Auburn University Boston Architectural College University of are preliminary results. Bowling Green State University University of Cincinnati California College of the Arts University of Hawaii at Manoa Please contact Kendall University of Houston City College of New of Idaho Nicholson, ACSA Clemson University University of Illinois, Urbana-Cham- Director of Research Cornell University paign Drury University University of Memphis and Information, for Florida Agricultural and Mechanical more complete results, University University of Minnesota available in April 2018. Florida Atlantic University University of Nebraska-Lincoln Florida International University University of Nevada, Las Vegas Georgia Institute of Technology University of New Mexico Hampton University University of Oklahoma Illinois Institute of Technology University of Southern California Iowa State University University of Tennessee-Knoxville Kansas State University University of Utah Kennesaw State University University of Virginia Kent State University University of Washington Lawrence Technological University Louisiana State University University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Louisiana Tech University Washington University in St. Louis McGill University Woodbury University Mississippi State University Yale University Montana State University Morgan State University New Jersey Institute of Technology Northeastern University Norwich University The Ohio State University Oklahoma State University Pennsylvania State University Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Portland State University Prairie View A&M University Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Rice University Rochester Institute of Technology Roger Williams University Savannah College of Art and Design South Dakota State University Syracuse University Temple University Texas A&M University Texas Tech University Thomas Jefferson University

2 International Engagement Survey—Draft Student In the past 5 years, we’ve admitted fewer students from: Admissions European Union Middle East + Recruiting Asia South America North America 30% of respondents have Eastern Europe budget for international student recruitment. Africa Carribean • Nearly 25% of Central America respondents reported: 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 • Attending international college fairs • Hosting an event In the past 5 years, we’ve admitted more students from: on-campus for Asia prospective Middle East international students South America • Visiting schools in other Africa countries North America European Union Eastern Europe Carribean Central America 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Our international students are citizens of: China India Iran Saudi Arabia Mexico South Korea Brazil Canada

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

3 International Engagement Survey—Draft Student Other student countries of origin: Colombia Chile Admissions Nigeria Burkina Faso Turkey Australia + Recruiting Taiwan Zimbabwe Russia United States Ecuador Trinidad and Tobago Venezuela Tonga Japan Sierra Leone Iraq Qatar Ghana Poland Vietnam Pakistan Spain Oman Hong Kong Nicaragua Dominican Republic New Zealand Bahamas Nepal Argentina Kuwait United Kingdom Italy United Arab Emirates Indonesia Syria Haiti South Africa Guatemala Rwanda Cuba Panama Cambodia Jordan Bulgaria Jamaica Bolivia Germany Bangladesh France Angola Egypt Afghanistan

4 International Engagement Survey—Draft Study Abroad Regions Where Respondents Study Abroad

91% of respondents offer study abroad.

At least 74% make study abroad optional.

At least 79% require addi- tional fees.

83% manage study abroad on their own and not through a foreign uni- versity.

Degree Level Count

5 International Engagement Survey—Draft Does your school have an international partnership with an- Partnerships other university or architecture program?

3% of respondents re- ported an articulated dual With Another No 49% Yes 51% degree program. Program 57%

With Another Institution 16%

Other 11% Both 16%

51% of respondents said they have a student exchange pro- Student gram at their school. (Most common location descriptors.) Exchanges

Approximately 10 students was the average number of students involved in an exchange in a year (range 1-50).

6 International Engagement Survey—Draft Does your program have a faculty exchange? If yes, is it tied Faculty to teaching and does it involve student exchange?

Exchanges Includes Student Yes 23% Exchange 26% 7 schools (47%) with ex- changes indicated theirs Tied to Teaching 39% was supported by external funding.

No 77% Both Teaching and Students 26%

Select Comments (edited) • Arrangement with University of faculty but is open to full participa- Western Australia in Perth. Some tion by Department of Architecture funds provided by Australia Ful- students and faculty. bright program • We have different kinds of rela- • We have a dual degree program tionships with different schools. with Tongji University College of In some instances we exchange Architecture and urban Planning. students and can exchange faculty All other agreements involve stu- for teaching. In other instances we dent and faculty exchange around can exchange faculty for research. specific projects, often jointly We also work with various schools coordinated. for one or two years collaborating • Currently we host students from on studios. the Istanbul Technical University • We have research faculty ex- as well as a faculty member who change programs that are inde- will teach studio while here in the pendent of the student exchanges, US. Travel warnings to Turkey but students participate in the have made this arrangement research work. unbalanced. • Exchanges are one for one. Facul- • This program is primarily admin- ty essentially change places for a istered by the Department of City period of time--usually 2-4 weeks. + Regional Planning and their

68% of respondents said faculty are collaborating on research Research internationally. (Most common descriptors.) Collaboration

7 International Engagement Survey—Draft