2 0 1 2 VC22 M Od E Rn Oxo Nec Olog Y Suborder MYXOPHAGA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2 0 1 2 VC22 M Od E Rn Oxo Nec Olog Y Suborder MYXOPHAGA Subfossil Vc22 VCH Vc23 1939-2012 VC22 modern Oxon ecology 1 Suborder MYXOPHAGA 2 3 SPHAERIUSIDAE 4 SPHAERIIDAE 5 MICROSPORIDAE 6 Sphaerius acaroides Waltl ● ● 7 8 Suborder ADEPHAGA 10 GYRINIDAE 11 GYRININAE 12 Gyrinus aeratus Stephens ● ● Canals and slow flowing river margins 16 Gyrinus marinus Gyllenhal ● ● ● ● Local, on open water especially on large water bodies such as lakes and canal margins. 22 Gyrinus substriatus Stephens ● ● ● ● Widespread and often abundant on ponds, canals, ditches and lakes. 23 Gyrinus suffriani Scriba ● ● Rare in fens 24 Gyrinus urinator Illiger ●1998 ● Rare in flowing water margins. 25 Orectochilus villosus (Müller) ● ● ● ● rare, on streams often in deep shade. Largely nocturnal and easily overlooked.B 26 27 HALIPLIDAE 28 Brychius elevatus (Panzer) ● ● ● ● rare in flowing water especially in submerged gravel and near weirs 29 Peltodytes caesus (Duftschmid) ● ● ● Local but increasing? Weedy ponds, 30 Haliplus confinis Stephens ● ● ● ● Local in ponds, lakes and canals with Charophytes. 31 Haliplus obliquus (Fabricius) ● ● ● ● Local, but can be a rapid coloniser of new ponds with Chara 33 Haliplus lineatocollis (Marsham) ● ● ● ● Widespread in streams, ditches and weedy ponds. 35 Haliplus fluviatilis Aubé ● ● ● Widespread in ponds, lakes, canals etc. 36 Haliplus furcatus Seidlitz ● ● Rare in fen pond 37 Haliplus heydeni Wehncke ● ● Very Local in small detritus ponds 38 Haliplus immaculatus Gerhardt ● ● ● ● Widespread in weedy ponds. 39 Haliplus lineolatus Mannerheim ● ● ● Rare? [Canals, ponds, flooded gravel pits]. Subfossil Vc22 VCH Vc23 1939-2012 VC22 modern Oxon ecology Haliplus mucronatus Stephens Na ● ● Rare one record 40 Haliplus ruficollis (De Geer) ● ● ● Widespread in detritus ponds. 41 Haliplus sibiricus Motschulsky ● ● ● Local in standing water. 42 (= wehnckei ) Local in standing water. 43 Haliplus flavicollis Sturm ● ● ● ● in large ponds, ditches, canals. 44 Haliplus fulvus (Fabricius) ● ● ● rare possibly extinct 45 Haliplus laminatus (Schaller) ● ● ● Weedy streams and ponds. 47 Haliplus variegatus Sturm ● ● extinct 48 49 NOTERIDAE 50 Noterus clavicornis (De Geer) ● ● ● ● Widespread and common in ponds, canals, and lakes. 54 55 PAELOBIIDAE 56 HYGROBIIDAE 57 Hygrobia hermanni (Fabricius) ● ● ● ● Widespread in ponds esp. with silty substrates. 59 60 DYTISCIDAE 61 AGABINAE 64 Agabus sturmii (Gyllenhal in Schönherr)● ● ● ● Widespread in detritus ponds. 65 Agabus labiatus (Brahm) ● ● 66 Agabus uliginosus (Linnaeus) ● ● Rare in mesotrophic pools 69 Agabus biguttatus (Olivier) ● ● Rare.Calcareous ground fed waters, spring heads 70 Agabus bipustulatus (Linnaeus) E.Ho● ● ● ● Ubiquitous in stagnant water including horse troughs etc., a strong flyer. 73 Agabus didymus (Olivier) ● ● ● ● Local in flowing water amongst marginal vegetation. 74 Agabus guttatus (Paykull) ● ● ● ● Local in spring fed streams and well-heads, also outfalls of man-made drains. 77 Agabus nebulosus (Forster) ● ● ● ● Widespread. In silt ponds esecially. New or recently cleared sites, a strong flier also frequent in troughs etc. 78 Agabus paludosus (Fabricius) ● ● ● ● Local, in weedy margins of flowing water, also around small seepages and springheads in flooded litter and moss. 82 Ilybius ater (De Geer) ● ● ● ● Widespread in all kinds of standing waters. Also comes to light. 83 Ilybius chalconatus (Panzer) ● ● ●1998● Local. In ponds and rut pools in wooded areas, Subfossil Vc22 VCH Vc23 1939-2012 VC22 modern Oxon ecology 84 Ilybius fenestratus (Fabricius) ● ● ● ● Very Local. In large ponds, lakes especially in heathland areas. 85 Ilybius fuliginosus (Fabricius) ● ● ● ● Widespread in ponds and weedy margins of flowing water. Also comes to light. 87 Ilybius montanus (Stephens) ● ● ● Localespecially in acid waters 89 Ilybius quadriguttatus (Lacordaire) ● ●2005 ● Local in detritus ponds. 92 Platambus maculatus (Linnaeus)E.Ho ● ● ● Local in flowing water, streams, and rivers. Tolerant of shade. 93 94 COLYMBETINAE 95 Colymbetes fuscus (Linnaeus) E.Ho● ● ● ● Frequent species of ponds of all kinds. 99 Rhantus exsoletus (Forster) ● ● ● ● Local in detritus ponds and marshy areas. 101 Rhantus suturalis (MacLeay) ● ● ● ● Widespread good coloniser of new and recently cleared silt pools. 104 105 COPELATINAE 106 Liopterus haemorrhoidalis (Fabricius)● ● ● ● Local. In weedy detritus ponds and bog pools. 107 (= Copelatus ) 108 109 DYTISCINAE 111 Acilius sulcatus (Linnaeus) ● ● ● ● Local in a wide variety of still waters, but intolerant of fish stocking. 117 Dytiscus circumflexus Fabricius ● ● ● Scarce, increasing? In ponds with open silty substrates. 120 Dytiscus marginalis Linnaeus ● ● ● ● Ubiquitous in standing water of all kinds, especially where amphibians are breeding, as larvae specialise in tadpoles. 121 Dytiscus semisulcatus Müller, O.F. ● ● ●2011● Rare, most records from stagnant water in heath ponds and peat pools. 124 Hydaticus seminiger (De Geer) ●2009●2011● recnt colonist increasingly found n rich pools in shade and open situations 126 127 HYDROPORINAE 130 Hydroglyphus geminus (Fabricius) ● ● ● ● Rare, most records from stagnant water in heath ponds and peat pools. 135 Graptodytes granularis (Linnaeus) ● ● ● ● Rare. Richly weeded ponds 136 Graptodytes pictus (Fabricius) ● ● ● ● very locally abundant in ponds and ditches. 137 Hydroporus angustatus Sturm ● ● ● Widespread, and common in ponds, canals, and lakes, avoiding acidic waters 138 Hydroporus discretus Fairmaire & Brisout● ● ● ● Very Local in spring fed puddles and pools. 140 Hydroporus erythrocephalus (Linnaeus)● ● ● ● Widespread and common in ponds and lakes, especially in acidic heath ponds. Subfossil Vc22 VCH Vc23 1939-2012 VC22 modern Oxon ecology 141 Hydroporus ferrugineus Stephens ● ● rare in Subterranean spring heads 143 Hydroporus gyllenhalii Schiødte ● ● RARE in acidic heath ponds. 145 Hydroporus incognitus Sharp ● ● ● ● Local in shaded pools and marshy pools beside streams. 148 Hydroporus marginatus (Duftschmid)● ● ● Semi subterranean in winterbourne streams. 150 Hydroporus memnonius Nicolai ● ● ● ● Widespread in woodland pools in flooded leaf litter. Hydroporus neglectus Schaum Nb ● ● Shaded acis waters and seepages 156 Hydroporus nigrita (Fabricius) ●1996●1998● Local in a variety of small water bodies including small seasonal pools. Hydroporus obscurus Sturm ●1906● [ in Sphagnum pools] 159 Hydroporus palustris (Linnaeus) ● ● ● ● Widespread in detritus ponds and marshy areas by lakes and flowing water. 160 Hydroporus planus (Fabricius) ● ● ● ● Widespread rapid coloniser of new and recently cleared ponds also in water troughs. 161 Hydroporus pubescens (Gyllenhal) ● ● ● ● Widespread in acid standing water. 164 Hydroporus striola (Gyllenhal) ● ● ● ● Local in standing water. 165 Hydroporus tessellatus (Drapiez) ● ● ● ● Widespread. Rapid coloniser of new and recently cleared ponds also in water troughs, isolated puddles. Hydroporus umbrosus (Gyllenhal) ● ● rare in mossy fen pools 170 Nebrioporus elegans (Panzer) ● ● ● ● Local in rivers and permanent streams. Also occasionally in deep ponds in pits etc. 175 Oreodytes sanmarkii (Sahlberg, C.R.)● ● Rare. Gravelly streams in root tangles, shade tolerant. 178 Porhydrus lineatus (Fabricius) ● ●1998 ● Rare. Ponds, ditches etc.] 179 Scarodytes halensis (Fabricius) ● ● Local, increasing 180 Stictonectes lepidus (Olivier) ● ● Extinct?? 181 Stictotarsus duodecimpustulatus E.Ho(Fabricius)● ● ● ● Local in rivers and streams especially in bare sections under submerged ledges etc. 184 Suphrodytes dorsalis sensu lato ● ● ● ● recently split status under review 187 Hygrotus (Coelambus) confluens (Fabricius)● ● ● ● Widespread a rapid coloniser of new ponds with silty substrates. 188 Hygrotus (Coelambus) impressopunctatus● (Schaller)● ● ● Widespread in field ponds, Hygrotus (Coelambus) nigrolineatus (Steven)● ● Recent immigrant increasing in new ponds. 194 Hygrotus (s.str.) inaequalis (Fabricius)H/Rom● ● ● ● Widespread and common in ponds, canals, and lakes. 196 Hygrotus (s.str.) versicolor (Schaller) ● ● ● ● Local in gravel ponds, canal margins. 197 Hyphydrus ovatus (Linnaeus) ● ● ● ● Widespread and common in ponds, canals, and lakes. 199 200 LACCOPHILINAE Subfossil Vc22 VCH Vc23 1939-2012 VC22 modern Oxon ecology 201 Laccophilus hyalinus (De Geer) ● ● ● ● Local, in slow flowing water, occasionally in ponds, 202 Laccophilus minutus (Linnaeus) ● ● ● ● Widespread and common in ponds, canals, and lakes. 205 206 CARABIDAE 207 CICINDELINAE 209 Cicindela campestris Linnaeus ● ● ● ● Local on open dry soils, scattered in woodlands and disturbed ground. 215 216 BRACHININAE 217 Brachinus crepitans (Linnaeus) ● ●2003 ● Rare on chalky soils, no post 1980 records, possibly extinct? 219 223 CARABINAE 224 CARABINI 225 Calosoma inquisitor (Linnaeus) ● ●1953● ● Extinct? [Arboreal on oaks etc.] 229 Carabus arvensis Herbst ? ? extinct Specimen labelled Oxford in JJW coll. 230 Carabus granulatus Linnaeus E.Hol● ● ● ● Local in damp meadows, 10 post 1980 records. 231 Carabus monilis Fabricius ● ● ● ● Widespread in open habitats. 232 Carabus nemoralis Müller, O.F. Rom● ● ● ● local in dry areas 236 Carabus problematicus Herbst ● ● ● ● scarce primarily on calcareous grassland in Oxon. 238 Carabus violaceus Linnaeus ● ● ● ● Widespread and common occurring in woods, parks, gardens, and more open habitats. 239 CYCHRINI 240 Cychrus caraboides (Linnaeus) ● ● ● ● Widespread in wooded districts. A flightless snail predator. 241 NEBRIINI 243 Leistus rufomarginatus (Duftschmid) B215● ● ● 20th century colonist (first noted in the 1940s), now widespread especially in woods
Recommended publications
  • Rafał Ruta Zabytkowy Park W Kujanie Koło Złotowa Jako Ostoja
    Przegląd Przyrodniczy XXV, 2 (2014): 91-100 Rafał Ruta ZABYTKOWY PARK W KUJANIE KOłO ZłOTOWA JAKO OSTOJA SAPROKSYLICZNYCH CHrząSZCZY (INSECTA: COLEOPTERA) An old park in Kujan near Złotów as a refuge of saproxylic beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) ABSTRAKT: Podsumowano kilkuletnie obserwacje nad chrząszczami parku w Kujanie. W niewielkim obiekcie o pow. ok. 2 ha odnotowano występowanie rzadkich owadów saproksylicznych, jak Anitys ru- bens, Elater ferrugineus, Osmoderma barnabita i Gnorimus nobilis. Przedyskutowano znaczenie obiektu dla zachowania fauny saproksylicznej. SŁOWA KLUCZOWE: Pomorze, Bory Kujańskie, martwe drewno, ochrona przyrody, owady, Coleo- ptera, Diptera ABSTRACT: Survey of Coleoptera of a park in Kujan is recapitulated. In the small park (area of ca. 2 ha) several endangered species were found, including Anitys rubens, Elater ferrugineus, Osmoderma barna- bita and Gnorimus nobilis. Significance of the area for preservation of saproxylic fauna is discussed. KEY WORDS: Pomerania, Bory Kujańskie forest, deadwood, nature conservation, insects, Coleoptera, Diptera Wstęp saproksylicznych w okolicach Piły. Znacze- nie zabytkowych alej drzew dla entomofau- Owady saproksyliczne, wymagające do ny w okolicach Piły odnotowali Ruta i Melke życia sędziwych, obumierających i mar- (2002) dla otoczenia rez. Kuźnik k. Piły oraz twych drzew, w gospodarczych lasach stały Gutowski i Ruta (2004) dla okolic Tuczna. się rzadkie wraz z juwenalizacją drzewo- W latach 1995-2014 prowadzono nie- stanów i zmianą ich składu gatunkowego. regularne obserwacje entomologiczne w W wielu przypadkach zastępczym środo- niewielkim parku w miejscowości Kujan wiskiem stały się dla nich aleje, w których (koordynaty: 53.3644N, 17.1881 E), których poszczególne drzewa osiągają starszy wiek, podsumowaniem jest niniejsza publikacja. niż w okolicznych lasach gospodarczych. Podobne znaczenie mają stare parki o roz- maitej genezie (Franc 1997, Jonsell 2004, Teren badani i metodyka Stokland et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Topic Paper Chilterns Beechwoods
    . O O o . 0 O . 0 . O Shoping growth in Docorum Appendices for Topic Paper for the Chilterns Beechwoods SAC A summary/overview of available evidence BOROUGH Dacorum Local Plan (2020-2038) Emerging Strategy for Growth COUNCIL November 2020 Appendices Natural England reports 5 Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation 6 Appendix 1: Citation for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation (SAC) 7 Appendix 2: Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Features Matrix 9 Appendix 3: European Site Conservation Objectives for Chilterns Beechwoods Special Area of Conservation Site Code: UK0012724 11 Appendix 4: Site Improvement Plan for Chilterns Beechwoods SAC, 2015 13 Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 27 Appendix 5: Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI citation 28 Appendix 6: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 31 Appendix 7: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Ashridge Commons and Woods SSSI 33 Appendix 8: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Ashridge Commons and Woods, SSSI, Hertfordshire/Buckinghamshire 38 Appendix 9: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Ashridge Commons and Woods Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003 40 Tring Woodlands SSSI 44 Appendix 10: Tring Woodlands SSSI citation 45 Appendix 11: Condition summary from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 48 Appendix 12: Condition Assessment from Natural England’s website for Tring Woodlands SSSI 51 Appendix 13: Operations likely to damage the special interest features at Tring Woodlands SSSI 53 Appendix 14: Views About Management: A statement of English Nature’s views about the management of Tring Woodlands Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Jahresberichte Des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Wuppertal E.V
    Jber. naturwiss. Ver. Wuppertal 53 158- 205 Wuppertal, 15.12.2000 Das Käfervorkommen im Burgholz - Untersuchungsaspekte von 1952 bis 1996 Wolfgang Kolbe Mit 1 Tabelle Abstract Since the beginning of the second part of the 20'h century systematic collections ofbeetles were made to investigate the forest populations of the Burgholz State Forest in Wuppertal and Solingen (Northrhine­ Westphalia, Germany). H.-U. TRIELE was the first, who studied comparatively the composition of animal communities - among other arthropods also the beetles- of 9 testareas in the Burgholz State Forest (1952/53). A new phase in exploration of Coleoptera starts 1969. Over a period of 25 years investigations were made to explore the Coleoptera. One aspect was the influence of the red ants (Formica polyctena) as enemies of carabids.- Very important apparatures to study the structure and dynamic of several populations are pitfall traps, ground photoeclectors and arboreal photoeclectors. Within the catched beetle species above all Staphylinidae, Curculionidae, Scolytidae und Rhizophagidae are in the centre of interest. Important results yield also the investigation in different types offorests (exotic and indigenous wood­ land trees ), Anfang der zweiten Hälfte des vergangeneu Jahrhunderts begannen die gezielten Aufsammlungen von Käfern in den Wäldern des Staatsforstes Burgholz in Wupper­ tal und Solingen. Es war Hans-Ulrich TRIELE, der 1952 und 1953 die Aufnahme von Tierbeständen zur Erfassung der Tiergesellschaften in der Bodenstreu verschie­ dener Waldtypen des Niederbergischen Landes durchführte. Neun seiner insgesamt 27 Probeflächen befanden sich im Burgholz; dabei handelte es sich um Buchen­ Traubeneichen-Wälder, Fichten- und Lärchenaufforstungen. Hier ein Zitat aus sei­ ner einschlägigen Publikation: "Von allen in dieser Arbeit behandelten Tiergruppen stellen die Käfer die artenreichste dar.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Work Profile
    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Xerotermní Lokality V Okolí Vladislavi – Zoologický a Botanický Průzkum
    Xerotermní lokality v okolí Vladislavi – zoologický a botanický průzkum Grantový program: Fond Vysočiny – Krajina Vysočiny 2009, projket č. FV - 016/231/09 Zpracoval: Ing. Václav Křivan, Mgr. Aleš Jelínek, Mgr. Filip Lysák, ZO ČSOP Kněţice, Kněţice 109, 671 21, Okříšky, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Datum zpracování: VI. 2009 – IX. 2010 1. Základní identifikační a popisné údaje Zadání: Prŧzkum vegetace, flóry a vybraných skupin bezobratlých (brouci, motýli, pavouci) na vybraných xerotermních lokalitách v okolí Vladislavi na Třebíčsku v rámci projektu Fond Vysočiny – Krajina Vysočiny 2009 (Grantový program na podporu prŧzkumu a poznávání krajiny). Katastrální území: Vladislav, Stříteţ Nadmořská výška: 380 - 450 m n.m. Rozloha: 14 ha Popis lokality: Komplex xerotermních biotopŧ bývalých pastvin v okolí městyse Vladislav tvoří několik samostatných lokalit na levém i pravém břehu řeky Jihlavy o souhrné výměře cca 14 ha. Nejčastěji jsou to poměrně příkré skalnaté stráně a převáţně jiţně orientované svahy v zaříznutém údolí řeky, včetně ústí několika drobných přítokŧ (Mlýnský p., Řezanec). Dále sem patří i některé lokality na plošině nad horní hranou říčního údolí – suchý úhor přecházející v severní a východní svah na jiţním okraji obce nedaleko výjezdu na Číměř nebo malé údolíčko se zaříznutými svahy severovýchodním směrem od centra u silnice ke Smrku. (Pozn. v podané ţádosti k projektu byl vyznačen předběţný výběr zkoumaných lokalit, jejich definitivní vymezení bylo v prŧběhu prŧzkumu upřesňováno, tak aby byly zvoleny vţdy co nejreprezentativnější plochy). Na biodiverzitě území se kromě pestré modelace terénu činností řeky (říční fenomén) podílí zejména geologické podloţí, tvořené horninami třebíčského syenitového masivu a v neposlední řadě i činnost člověka, který zkoumané biotopy vyuţíval stovky let jako celoroční pastviny svého dobytka.
    [Show full text]
  • List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007)
    UK Biodiversity Action Plan List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007) For more information about the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) visit https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/uk-bap/ List of UK BAP Priority Terrestrial Invertebrate Species (2007) A list of the UK BAP priority terrestrial invertebrate species, divided by taxonomic group into: Insects, Arachnids, Molluscs and Other invertebrates (Crustaceans, Worms, Cnidaria, Bryozoans, Millipedes, Centipedes), is provided in the tables below. The list was created between 1995 and 1999, and subsequently updated in response to the Species and Habitats Review Report published in 2007. The table also provides details of the species' occurrences in the four UK countries, and describes whether the species was an 'original' species (on the original list created between 1995 and 1999), or was added following the 2007 review. All original species were provided with Species Action Plans (SAPs), species statements, or are included within grouped plans or statements, whereas there are no published plans for the species added in 2007. Scientific names and commonly used synonyms derive from the Nameserver facility of the UK Species Dictionary, which is managed by the Natural History Museum. Insects Scientific name Common Taxon England Scotland Wales Northern Original UK name Ireland BAP species? Acosmetia caliginosa Reddish Buff moth Y N Yes – SAP Acronicta psi Grey Dagger moth Y Y Y Y Acronicta rumicis Knot Grass moth Y Y N Y Adscita statices The Forester moth Y Y Y Y Aeshna isosceles
    [Show full text]
  • HADULLA WAGNER 2016 Hundsbachtal
    Mitt. Arb.gem. Rhein. Koleopterologen (Bonn) 26 , 2016, 11–25 Zur Käferfauna (Coleoptera) der Blockhalden im Hundsbachtal bei Gerolstein Ergebnisse der Gemeinschaftsexkursionen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Rheinischer Koleopterologen im April 2013 KARL HADULLA & THOMAS WAGNER Kurzfassung: Im Naturschutzgebiet Hundsbachtal südwestlich von Gerolstein in der Eifel befindet sich in einer Blockschutthalde am Rande eines Basaltschlacken- vulkans ein bekannter Standort für Glazialrelikte der Tierwelt. Am 13. April 2013 fand eine Exkursion statt, während der auch Bodenfallen tief in den Blockschutt ausgebracht und zwei Wochen später eingeholt wurden. Es konnten insgesamt 210 Käferarten nachgewiesen werden, 24 in Bodenfallen und davon acht ausschließlich mit dieser Methode. Darunter waren eine Anzahl cavernicoler Arten, dabei auch Choleva lederiana als Erstfund für das Rheinland, sowie der blockhaldenspezifische Kurzflügler Leptusa simonii . Ein Wiederfund nach 50 Jahren für die Rheinprovinz ist Orthocerus clavicornis . Auf die taxonomisch-nomenklatorischen Änderungen von Choleva lederiana , deren Berücksichtigung in der Bestimmungsliteratur und ihre aktuelle mitteleuropäische Verbreitung, wird im Besonderen eingegangen. Abstract: The Nature Reserve „Hundsbachtal“ southwest of Gerolstein, Eifel moun- tains in Western Germany, has a large scree slope along an pleistocaene volcano and is a well known area for glacial relict species. During an excursion on 13th of April 2013 pitfall traps have been set most deeply in rubble that were collected two weeks later. Altogether 210 beetle species could be found, 24 in the pitfall traps, and eight of them exclusively with this method. Beyond the numerous cavernicolous beetles, many Choleva lederiana could be found for the first time in the Rhineland, further- more the scree slope typic staphylinid Leptusa simonii . As a recapture after fifty years in the Rhineland, Orthocerus clavicornis was found on gravel ground covered with lichens close to the mouth of the Hundsbach creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Coleoptera, Attelabidae, Apoderinae, Hoplapoderini
    Zootaxa 1089: 37–47 (2005) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1089 Copyright © 2005 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A new genus and species of Hoplapoderini from Madagascar (Coleoptera: Attelabidae: Apoderinae) SILVANO BIONDI Via E. di Velo 137, I-36100 Vicenza - Italy. email: [email protected] Abstract Madapoderus pacificus, a new genus and species of hoplapoderine attelabid beetles, is described from Madagascar. A key to the genera of Hoplapoderini and field observations on the host plant and reproductive behaviour of the new species are provided. Key words: Attelabidae, Apoderinae, Hoplapoderini, Madagascar, new genus, new species, Grewia Introduction In May 2002, among specimens of Attelabidae collected in Madagascar by David Hauck some months earlier, I received two males belonging to the apoderine tribe Hoplapoderini that could not be assigned to any known genus. A study of the rich collection of Madagascan attelabids at the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, a few months later confirmed this diagnosis. During a month-long collecting expedition in Madagascar in December 2003 and January 2004, I collected the new taxon again, at a different locality, and could carry out some observations on its behaviour. Systematics Tribe Hoplapoderini Voss, 1926 Voss (1926) defined his tribe Hoplapoderini largely on the basis of features of the head and elytra. The new Madagascan genus fits into this tribe due to its tapered head, with maximum width near the basis, and its tuberculate elytra. Voss also provided a key to the Accepted by Q. Wang: 7 Oct. 2005; published: 2 Dec. 2005 37 ZOOTAXA genera of the tribe, but this is largely inadequate because of its heavy reliance on the 1089 presence and shape of what he called “abdominal lobes” (“Abdominallappen”).
    [Show full text]
  • Blattkäfer (Coleoptera: Megalopodidae, Orsodacnidae Et Chryso- Melidae Excl
    Blattkäfer (Coleoptera: Megalopodidae, Orsodacnidae et Chryso- melidae excl. Bruchinae) Bestandssituation. Stand: März 2013 Wolfgang Bäse Einführung Exkremente zum Schutz vor Feinden auf dem Rücken. Nur wenige Blattkäfer-Arten sind durch ihre wirt- Zu den Blattkäfern gehören nach Löbl & Smetana schaftliche Bedeutung allgemein bekannt. Hierzu gehö- (2010) drei Familien. So werden die ehemaligen Un- ren der Kartoffelkäfer, der Rübenschildkäfer (Cassida terfamilien Zeugophorinae als Megalopodidae und die nebulosa), Vertreter der Kohlerdflöhe (Phyllotreta spp.) Orsodacninae als Orsodacnidae interpretiert. Die ur- und die Spargel-, Getreide- und Lilienhähnchen (Crio- sprüngliche Familie der Samenkäfer (Bruchidae) zählt ceris spp., Oulema spp. und Lilioceris spp.). Viele Arten jetzt als Unterfamilie (Bruchinae) zu den Chrysomelidae. sind jedoch durch die Zerstörung naturnaher Standorte In dieser Arbeit fehlen die Samenkäfer, da die Datenlage gefährdet. So waren die Schilfkäfer ursprünglich an die momentan als nicht ausreichend angesehen wird. dynamischen Auenbereiche der Bäche und Flüsse gebun- Zu den größten Käferfamilien der Welt gehörend, sind den. Durch Grundwasserabsenkungen, Uferzerstörung die Blattkäfer ohne Berücksichtigung der Samenkäfer in und intensive Freizeitnutzung wurden viele ursprüng- Deutschland mit 510 Arten (Geiser 1998) vertreten. liche Lebensräume zerstört. Weniger spezialisierte Arten Der Habitus der Blattkäfer ist nicht einheitlich. Ne- sind vielfach noch ungefährdet, da sie auf sekundäre ben dem typischen gewölbten bis eiförmigen Habitus, Lebensräume wie Teiche oder Gräben ausweichen kön- wie er vom Kartoffelkäfer (Leptinotarsa decemlineata) nen. Die seltener nachgewiesenen Arten sind oft hoch- bekannt ist, gibt es bockkäferähnliche Formen bei den spezialisiert. So ist Donacia obscura nur in Mooren zu Schilfkäfern (Donaciinae), flachgedrückte Vertreter bei finden, während Macroplea mutica im Binnenland an den Schildkäfern (Cassida spp.), die eher zylindrisch ge- Salzseen gebunden ist.
    [Show full text]
  • Beetles from Sălaj County, Romania (Coleoptera, Excluding Carabidae)
    Studia Universitatis “Vasile Goldiş”, Seria Ştiinţele Vieţii Vol. 26 supplement 1, 2016, pp.5- 58 © 2016 Vasile Goldis University Press (www.studiauniversitatis.ro) BEETLES FROM SĂLAJ COUNTY, ROMANIA (COLEOPTERA, EXCLUDING CARABIDAE) Ottó Merkl, Tamás Németh, Attila Podlussány Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum ABSTRACT: During a faunistical exploration of Sǎlaj county carried out in 2014 and 2015, 840 beetle species were recorded, including two species of Community interest (Natura 2000 species): Cucujus cinnaberinus (Scopoli, 1763) and Lucanus cervus Linnaeus, 1758. Notes on the distribution of Augyles marmota (Kiesenwetter, 1850) (Heteroceridae), Trichodes punctatus Fischer von Waldheim, 1829 (Cleridae), Laena reitteri Weise, 1877 (Tenebrionidae), Brachysomus ornatus Stierlin, 1892, Lixus cylindrus (Fabricius, 1781) (Curculionidae), Mylacomorphus globus (Seidlitz, 1868) (Curculionidae) are given. Key words: Coleoptera, beetles, Sǎlaj, Romania, Transsylvania, faunistics INTRODUCTION: László Dányi, LF = László Forró, LR = László The beetle fauna of Sǎlaj county is relatively little Ronkay, MT = Mária Tóth, OM = Ottó Merkl, PS = known compared to that of Romania, and even to other Péter Sulyán, VS = Viktória Szőke, ZB = Zsolt Bálint, parts of Transsylvania. Zilahi Kiss (1905) listed ZE = Zoltán Erőss, ZS = Zoltán Soltész, ZV = Zoltán altogether 2,214 data of 1,373 species of 537 genera Vas). The serial numbers in parentheses refer to the list from Sǎlaj county mainly based on his own collections of collecting sites published in this volume by A. and partially on those of Kuthy (1897). Some of his Gubányi. collection sites (e.g. Tasnád or Hadad) no longer The collected specimens were identified by belong to Sǎlaj county. numerous coleopterists. Their names are given under Vasile Goldiş Western University (Arad) and the the names of beetle families.
    [Show full text]
  • SPIXIANA ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München;Download
    ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München;download: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.biologiezentrum.at SPIXIANA ©Zoologische Staatssammlung München;download: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.biologiezentrum.at at leaping (haitikos in Greek) for locomotion and escape; thus, the original valid name of the type genus Altica Müller, 1764 (see Fürth, 1981). Many Flea Beetles are among the most affective jumpers in the animal kingdom, sometimes better than their namesakes the true Fleas (Siphonaptera). However, despite some intensive study of the anatomy and function of the metafemoral spring (Barth, 1954; Ker, 1977) the true function of this jumping mechanism remains a mystery. It probably is some sort of voluntary Catch, in- volving build-up of tension from the large muscles that insert on the metafemoral spring (Fig. 1), and theo a quick release of this energy. Ofcourse some Flea Beetles jump better than others, but basically all have this internal metafemoral spring floating by attachment from large muscles in the relatively enlarged bind femoral capsule (see Fig. 1 ). In fact Flea Beetles can usually be easily separated from other beetles, including chrysomelid subfa- milies, by their greatly swollen bind femora. There are a few genera of Alticinae that have a metafemoral spring and yet do not jump. Actually there are a few genera that are considered to be Alticinae that lack the metafemo- ral spring, e. g. Orthaltica (Scherer, 1974, 1981b - as discussed in this Symposium). Also the tribe Decarthrocerini contains three genera from Africa that Wilcox (1965) con- sidered as Galerucinae, but now thinks to be intermediate between Galerucinae and Alti- cinae; at least one of these genera does have a metafemoral spring (Wilcox, personal communication, and Fürth, unpublished data).
    [Show full text]
  • Für Naturschutz Und Landschaftspflege Schleswig-Holstein, Heft 5 LOHSE, G
    Landesamtfür Naturschutz und 24145 Kiel Verfasser: Wolfgang Ziegler Roland Suikat unter Mitarbeit von Stephan Gürlich Titelfoto: Eubrychius velutus (2,8 mm), ein untergetaucht lebender Russelkafer. Die dichte Beschuppung er- mdglicht es dein Käfer, einer Sauerstoff mantel mit sich zu fuhren, so daß das Auftauchen unterbleiben Fotos: Roland Suikat Herstellung dfni Druckerei Fotosatz Nord Wittland 8a 24109 Kiel Juli 1994 ISBN 3-923339-44-5 q o Der §!mschlag dieser Broschüre wurde auf Innenteil auf Recycling gedruckt. -papier Diese Druckschrift wird im Rahmen der Öffent- lichkeitsarbeit der schleswig-holsteinischen Landesregierung heraus- gegeben. Sie darf weder von Parteien noch von Personen, die Wahlwer- bung oder Wahlhilfe betreiben, im Wahlkampf zum Zwecke der Wahl- werbunguerwendet Auch ohne zeitlichen Bezug zu einer bevorste- henden Wahl darf die Druckschrift nicht in einer Weise verwendet werden, die als Parteinahme der Landesregierung zugun- sten einzelner Gruppen verstanden werden konnte. Den Parteien ist es gestattet, die Druckschrift zur Unterrichtung ihrer eigenen Mitglieder zu ocr- Inhalt 5 Einleitung 7 Erfassungsgrundlagen 8 Gefährdungskategorien 12 Nomenklatur 13 Familienregister 16 Rote Liste der Käfer Schlewig-Holsteins 80 Ubersicht zur Namensänderungen und systematischen Umstellungen in zoologisch-systematischer Sortierung 86 Bilanzierung und Gefährdungsursachen 93 Literatur Einleitung Die Käfer stellen weltweit eine der artenreichsten Ordnun- gen innerhalb des Tierreichs dar. In Schleswig-Holstein besiedeln sie mit Ausnahme des offenen Meeres sämtliche Lebensraumtypen. Aufgrund ihrer oftmals erstaunlichen Biotop- und Habitatbindungen sind die Käfer für die Bio- indikation, d. h. für die Bewertung von Lebensräumen und deren Einzelstrukturen, besonders geeignet. Vielfach aber sind die Lebensraumansprüche im einzelnen noch uner- forscht. Daraus erwächst umso stärker die Verpflichtung, die landschaftliche Strukturvielfalt zu erkennen, zu bewah- ren und wiederherzustellen.
    [Show full text]