DOCSLIB.ORG

TERRESTRIAL ARTHROPODS 2012-2016 BIOBLITZ VASHON ISLAND List Compiled By: Harsi Parker

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TERRESTRIAL ARTHROPODS 2012-2016 BIOBLITZ VASHON ISLAND List Compiled By: Harsi Parker COMPLETE LIST OF TERRESTRIAL ARTHROPODS 2012-2016 BIOBLITZ VASHON ISLAND List compiled by: Harsi Parker Number Species name Common name Notes Year Location Taxonomic Order 1 Gammaridae sp. scud 2016 J Amphipoda – Gammaridae 2 Hyalella sp. amphipod 2014, 2016 CH, J Amphipoda – Hyalellidae 3 Acari sp. #1 mite 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016 NP, SH, M, J Arachnida 4 Acari sp. #2 mite 2014 CH Arachnida 5 Opiliones sp. harvestman 2013, 2015 SH, M Arachnida 6 Callobius sp. hacklemesh weaver 2012 NP Arachnida – Amaurobiidae 7 Araneidae sp. orb weaver 2016 J Arachnida – Araneidae 8 Araneus diadematus Cross Orbweaver 2012, 2014 NP, CH Arachnida – Araneidae 9 Clubiona sp. leafcurling sac spider 2012 NP Arachnida – Clubionidae 10 Linyphiinae sp. sheetweb spider tentative ID 2012 NP Arachnida – Linyphiidae 11 Neriene sp. sheetweb spider tentative ID 2014 CH Arachnida – Linyphiidae 12 Pardosa sp. thinlegged wolf spider 2012 NP Arachnida – Lycosidae 13 Philodromus dispar running crab spider 2012 NP Arachnida – Philodromidae 14 Tibellus sp. slender crab spider tentative ID 2014 CH Arachnida – Philodromidae 15 Eris militaris Bronze Jumper tentative ID 2014 CH Arachnida – Salticidae 16 Metaphidippus manni jumping spider tentative ID 2014, 2016 CH, J Arachnida – Salticidae 17 Salticidae sp. #1 jumping spider 2014 CH Arachnida – Salticidae 18 Salticidae sp. #2 jumping spider 2015 M Arachnida – Salticidae 19 Salticus scenicus Zebra Jumper 2013, 2014, 2015 SH, CH, M Arachnida – Salticidae 20 Metellina sp. long-jawed orb weaver 2012 NP Arachnida – Tetragnathidae 21 Tetragnatha sp. long-jawed orb weaver 2013 SH Arachnida – Tetragnathidae 22 Theridiidae sp. cobweb spider 2012 NP Arachnida – Theridiidae 23 Misumena vatia Goldenrod Crab Spider 2013, 2016 SH, J Arachnida – Thomisidae 24 Thomisidae sp. crab spider 2014, 2015, 2016 CH, M, J Arachnida – Thomisidae 25 Lithobiomorpha sp. stone centipede 2012 NP Chilopoda 26 Scolopocryptops spinicaudus bark centipede tentative ID 2013, 2014 SH, CH Chilopoda – Scolopocryptopidae 27 Exapion fuscirostre Seed-feeding Weevil tentative ID 2015 M Coleoptera – Brentidae 28 Buprestis aurulenta Golden Buprestid 2014 CH Coleoptera – Buprestidae 29 Dichelotarsus sp. soldier beetle tentative ID 2013, 2015 SH, M Coleoptera – Cantharidae 30 Podabrus sp. soldier beetle 2012, 2015 NP, M Coleoptera – Cantharidae 31 Silis sp. soldier beetle tentative ID 2013, 2015 SH, M Coleoptera – Cantharidae 32 Carabidae sp. #1 ground beetle 2012 NP Coleoptera – Carabidae 33 Carabidae sp. #2 ground beetle 2013 SH Coleoptera – Carabidae 34 Carabidae sp. #3 ground beetle 2013 SH Coleoptera – Carabidae 35 Carabidae sp. #4 ground beetle 2014 CH Coleoptera – Carabidae 36 Carabidae sp. #5 ground beetle 2015 M Coleoptera – Carabidae 37 Carabidae sp. #6 ground beetle 2016 J Coleoptera – Carabidae 38 Loricera decempunctata ground beetle 2012 NP Coleoptera – Carabidae 39 Scaphinotus sp. ground beetle 2013 SH Coleoptera – Carabidae 40 Cerambycidae sp. long-horned beetle 2014 CH Coleoptera – Cerambycidae 41 Ortholeptura valida flower longhorn 2014 CH Coleoptera – Cerambycidae 42 Pidonia scripta flower longhorn 2013 SH Coleoptera – Cerambycidae 43 Spondylidinae sp. long-horned beetle 2014 CH Coleoptera – Cerambycidae 44 Bruchidius villosus Broom Seed Beetle tentative ID 2015, 2016 M, J Coleoptera – Chrysomelidae 45 Bruchus brachialis Vetch Bruchid tentative ID 2015 M Coleoptera – Chrysomelidae 46 Cassida rubiginosa Thistle Tortoise Beetle 2016 J Coleoptera – Chrysomelidae 47 Chrysolina sp. leaf beetle 2015 M Coleoptera – Chrysomelidae COMPLETE LIST OF TERRESTRIAL ARTHROPODS 2012-2016 BIOBLITZ VASHON ISLAND List compiled by: Harsi Parker Number Species name Common name Notes Year Location Taxonomic Order 48 Chrysomelidae sp. leaf beetle 2016 J Coleoptera – Chrysomelidae 49 Coccinella septempunctata Seven-spotted Lady Beetle 2014, 2015, 2016 CH, M, J Coleoptera – Coccinellidae 50 Cycloneda polita Western Blood-Red Lady Beetle 2012, 2013, 2016 NP, SH, J Coleoptera – Coccinellidae 51 Harmonia axyridis Multicolored Asian Lady Beetle 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 SH, CH, M, J Coleoptera – Coccinellidae 52 Psyllobora vigintimaculata Twenty-Spotted Lady Beetle 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 SH, CH, M, J Coleoptera – Coccinellidae 53 Scymninae sp. lady beetle tentative ID 2016 J Coleoptera – Coccinellidae 54 Ceutorhynchinae sp. minute seed weevil 2016 J Coleoptera – Curculionidae 55 Larinus planus Canada Thistle Bud Weevil tentative ID 2014, 2015 CH, M Coleoptera – Curculionidae 56 Otiorhynchus singularis Raspberry Weevil 2012 NP Coleoptera – Curculionidae 57 Sciopithes obscurus Obscure Root Weevil 2012 NP Coleoptera – Curculionidae 58 Dytiscidae sp. predaceous diving beetle 2012, 2014, 2016 NP, CH, J Coleoptera – Dytiscidae 59 Ctenicera silvatica click beetle tentative ID 2012 NP Coleoptera – Elateridae 60 Elateridae sp. #1 click beetle 2015 M Coleoptera – Elateridae 61 Elateridae sp. #2 click beetle 2016 J Coleoptera – Elateridae 62 Lara avara riffle beetle 2014, 2016 CH, J Coleoptera – Elmidae 63 Eucinetidae sp. plate-thigh beetle tentative ID 2014 CH Coleoptera – Eucinetidae 64 Haliplidae sp. crawling water beetle 2014, 2016 CH, J Coleoptera – Haliplidae 65 Histeridae sp. clown beetle tentative ID 2014 CH Coleoptera – Histeridae 66 Hydrophilidae sp. water scavenger beetle 2012, 2014 NP, CH Coleoptera – Hydrophilidae 67 Ellychnia sp. diurnal firefly 2013 SH Coleoptera – Lampyridae 68 Ditylus quadricollis false blister beetle tentative ID 2012 NP Coleoptera – Oedemeridae 69 Phalacridae sp. shining flower beetle tentative ID 2015 M Coleoptera – Phalacridae 70 Dendroides sp. fire-colored beetle 2014 CH Coleoptera – Pyrochroidae 71 Eusphalerum sp. ocellate rove beetle 2012, 2013 NP, SH Coleoptera – Staphylinidae 72 Staphylinidae sp. rove beetle 2013 SH Coleoptera – Staphylinidae 73 Stenus sp. water skater 2012 NP Coleoptera – Staphylinidae 74 Tachyporus sp. crab-like rove beetle tentative ID 2016 J Coleoptera – Staphylinidae 75 Namunaria pacifica cylindrical bark beetle 2013 SH Coleoptera – Zopheridae 76 Ptenothrix beta globular springtail 2012 NP Collembola – Dicyrtomidae 77 Entomobrya intermedia slender springtail tentative ID 2016 J Collembola – Entomobryidae 78 Entomobrya triangularis slender springtail 2012, 2016 NP Collembola – Entomobryidae 79 Orchesella villosa slender springtail 2012 NP Collembola – Entomobryidae 80 Sminthurididae sp. globular springtail 2016 J Collembola – Sminthurididae 81 Tomocerus sp. elongate-bodied springtail 2012 NP Collembola – Tomoceridae 82 Cyclopoida sp. cyclopoid copepod 2014 CH Copepoda 83 Anisolabis maritima Maritime Earwig tentative ID 2015 M Dermaptera – Anisolabididae 84 Forficula auricularia European Earwig 2012, 2014, 2015 NP, CH, M Dermaptera – Forficulidae 85 Diplopoda sp. millipede 2013 SH Diplopoda 86 Nearctodesmus sp. flat-backed millipede 2012, 2013, 2014 NP, SH, CH Diplopoda – Nearctodesmidae 87 Harpaphe haydeniana flat-backed millipede 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 SH, CH, M, J Diplopoda – Xystodesmidae 88 Liriomyza sp. leaf miner fly tentative ID 2013 SH Diptera – Agromyzidae 89 Phytomyza aquilegivora leaf miner fly tentative ID 2016 J Diptera – Agromyzidae 90 Phytomyza tiarellae leaf miner fly tentative ID 2013 SH Diptera – Agromyzidae 92 Eudioctria sp. robber fly tentative ID 2015, 2016 M, J Diptera – Asilidae 93 Hemipenthes sp. bee fly 2015 M Diptera – Bombyliidae 94 Villa sp. bee fly tentative ID 2014 CH Diptera – Bombyliidae 95 Calliphoridae sp. blow fly 2014 CH Diptera – Calliphoridae COMPLETE LIST OF TERRESTRIAL ARTHROPODS 2012-2016 BIOBLITZ VASHON ISLAND List compiled by: Harsi Parker Number Species name Common name Notes Year Location Taxonomic Order 96 Pollenia sp. cluster fly 2012 NP Diptera – Calliphoridae 97 Ceratopogoninae sp. biting midge 2016 J Diptera – Ceratopogonidae Chasmatonotus maculipennis midge tentative ID 2013 SH Diptera – Chironomidae 98 99 Chironomidae sp. midge 2014, 2016 CH, J Diptera – Chironomidae 100 Chloropidae sp. frit fly 2014 CH Diptera – Chloropidae 101 Conopidae sp. thick-headed fly 2015 M Diptera – Conopidae 102 Culicidae sp. mosquito 2013, 2014, 2016 SH, CH, J Diptera – Culicidae 103 Dixa sp. meniscus midge 2014 CH Diptera – Dixidae 104 Dixella sp. meniscus midge 2014 CH Diptera – Dixidae 105 Dolichopodidae sp. longlegged fly tentative ID 2013 SH Diptera – Dolichopodidae 106 Dryomyzidae sp. 2012 NP Diptera – Dryomyzidae 107 Oedaleinae sp. hybotid dance fly 2012 NP Diptera – Hybotidae 108 Platypalpus sp. hybotid dance fly 2012 NP Diptera – Hybotidae 109 Lauxaniidae sp. 2012 NP Diptera – Lauxaniidae 110 Limoniidae sp. limoniid crane fly 2012 NP Diptera – Limoniidae 111 Ulomorpha sp. limoniid crane fly 2014 CH Diptera – Limoniidae 112 Geomyza balachowskyi opomyzid fly tentative ID 2016 J Diptera – Opomyzidae 113 Geomyza tripunctata Cereal Fly tentative ID 2012 NP Diptera – Opomyzidae 114 Opomyza sp. opomyzid fly tentative ID 2016 J Diptera – Opomyzidae 115 Psychodinae sp. moth fly 2013 SH Diptera – Psychodidae 116 Ptychopteridae sp. phantom crane fly tentative ID 2013 SH Diptera – Ptychopteridae 117 Rhagionidae sp. snipe fly 2013 SH Diptera – Rhagionidae 118 Sarcophagidae sp. flesh fly tentative ID 2014, 2015, 2016 CH, M, J Diptera – Sarcophagidae 119 Scathophaga stercoraria Golden Dung Fly tentative ID 2013 SH Diptera – Scathophagidae 120 Scathophagidae sp. #1 dung fly 2012 NP Diptera – Scathophagidae 121 Scathophagidae sp. #2 dung fly 2012 NP Diptera – Scathophagidae 122 Sepsidae sp. black scavenger fly tentative ID 2014 CH Diptera – Sepsidae 123 Simulium sp. black fly 2014, 2016 CH, J Diptera
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E
    Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E. Carlton Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist) Suborder Adephaga Suborder Polyphaga, cont. •Carabidae Superfamily Scarabaeoidea •Dytiscidae •Lucanidae •Gyrinidae •Passalidae Suborder Polyphaga •Scarabaeidae Superfamily Staphylinoidea Superfamily Buprestoidea •Ptiliidae •Buprestidae •Silphidae Superfamily Byrroidea •Staphylinidae •Heteroceridae Superfamily Hydrophiloidea •Dryopidae •Hydrophilidae •Elmidae •Histeridae Superfamily Elateroidea •Elateridae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Cantharoidea Superfamily Cucujoidea •Lycidae •Nitidulidae •Cantharidae •Silvanidae •Lampyridae •Cucujidae Superfamily Bostrichoidea •Erotylidae •Dermestidae •Coccinellidae Bostrichidae Superfamily Tenebrionoidea •Anobiidae •Tenebrionidae Superfamily Cleroidea •Mordellidae •Cleridae •Meloidae •Anthicidae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Chrysomeloidea •Chrysomelidae •Cerambycidae Superfamily Curculionoidea •Brentidae •Curculionidae Total: 35 families of 131 in the U.S. Suborder Adephaga Family Carabidae “Ground and Tiger Beetles” Terrestrial predators or herbivores (few). 2600 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Dytiscidae “Predacious diving beetles” Adults and larvae aquatic predators. 500 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Gyrindae “Whirligig beetles” Aquatic, on water
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrated Ecological-Economic Model for Biological Pest Control
    1 An Integrated Ecological-Economic model for biological pest control 2 Daniels Silvie 1, Witters Nele 1 , Beliën Tim 2 , Vrancken Kristof 2, Vangronsveld Jaco 1, Van Passel 3 Steven 1 4 1 Hasselt University, Centre for Environmental Sciences, (BE) 2 Proefcentrum Fruitteelt, Sint-Truiden, 5 (BE) 6 7 1. Introduction 8 9 1.1 The need for objective monetary valuation of biodiversity losses 10 11 Biodiversity plays a key role in ecological processes and the delivery of ecosystem services, and its 12 importance has been widely recognized (MA, 2005). In spite global actions, biodiversity is declining at 13 an alarming rate (Butchart et al., 2012). In many cases, policy measures to safeguard biodiversity and 14 resource developments are mutually exclusive and hence biodiversity conservation implies the 15 decision to bear opportunity costs (Bennett et al., 2003). Being confronted with budget constraints, 16 policy makers need to justify decision-making by supporting evidence of biodiversity benefits 17 outweighing the opportunity costs incurred. 18 19 In 2001, the EU adopted the Biodiversity Action Plan, which aims at integrating environmental 20 requirements into a market policy. In its mid-term assessment, the Commission confirmed the need for 21 major action to stop the loss of biodiversity and acknowledged the need to strengthen independent 22 scientific advice to global policy making (EC, 2008). But in spite the need for objectively comparable 23 monetary standards to include biodiversity arguments in policymaking, the empirical literature 24 investigating the relationship between species diversity and it’s valuation from a farmers perspective is 25 still scarce (Finger, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Pohoria Burda Na Dostupných Historických Mapách Je Aj Cieľom Tohto Príspevku
    OCHRANA PRÍRODY NATURE CONSERVATION 27 / 2016 OCHRANA PRÍRODY NATURE CONSERVATION 27 / 2016 Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky Banská Bystrica Redakčná rada: prof. Dr. Ing. Viliam Pichler doc. RNDr. Ingrid Turisová, PhD. Mgr. Michal Adamec RNDr. Ján Kadlečík Ing. Marta Mútňanová RNDr. Katarína Králiková Recenzenti čísla: RNDr. Michal Ambros, PhD. Mgr. Peter Puchala, PhD. Ing. Jerguš Tesák doc. RNDr. Ingrid Turisová, PhD. Zostavil: RNDr. Katarína Králiková Jayzková korektúra: Mgr. Olga Majerová Grafická úprava: Ing. Viktória Ihringová Vydala: Štátna ochrana prírody Slovenskej republiky Banská Bystrica v roku 2016 Vydávané v elektronickej verzii Adresa redakcie: ŠOP SR, Tajovského 28B, 974 01 Banská Bystrica tel.: 048/413 66 61, e-mail: [email protected] ISSN: 2453-8183 Uzávierka predkladania príspevkov do nasledujúceho čísla (28): 30.9.2016. 2 \ Ochrana prírody, 27/2016 OCHRANA PRÍRODY INŠTRUKCIE PRE AUTOROV Vedecký časopis je zameraný najmä na publikovanie pôvodných vedeckých a odborných prác, recenzií a krátkych správ z ochrany prírody a krajiny, resp. z ochranárskej biológie, prioritne na Slovensku. Príspevky sú publikované v slovenskom, príp. českom jazyku s anglickým súhrnom, príp. v anglickom jazyku so slovenským (českým) súhrnom. Členenie príspevku 1) názov príspevku 2) neskrátené meno autora, adresa autora (vrátane adresy elektronickej pošty) 3) názov príspevku, abstrakt a kľúčové slová v anglickom jazyku 4) úvod, metodika, výsledky, diskusia, záver, literatúra Ilustrácie (obrázky, tabuľky, náčrty, mapky, mapy, grafy, fotografie) • minimálne rozlíšenie 1200 x 800 pixelov, rozlíšenie 300 dpi (digitálna fotografia má väčšinou 72 dpi) • každá ilustrácia bude uložená v samostatnom súbore (jpg, tif, bmp…) • používajte kilometrovú mierku, nie číselnú • mapy vytvorené v ArcView je nutné vyexportovať do formátov tif, jpg,..
    [Show full text]
  • Jahresberichte Des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins Wuppertal E.V
    Jber. naturwiss. Ver. Wuppertal 53 158- 205 Wuppertal, 15.12.2000 Das Käfervorkommen im Burgholz - Untersuchungsaspekte von 1952 bis 1996 Wolfgang Kolbe Mit 1 Tabelle Abstract Since the beginning of the second part of the 20'h century systematic collections ofbeetles were made to investigate the forest populations of the Burgholz State Forest in Wuppertal and Solingen (Northrhine­ Westphalia, Germany). H.-U. TRIELE was the first, who studied comparatively the composition of animal communities - among other arthropods also the beetles- of 9 testareas in the Burgholz State Forest (1952/53). A new phase in exploration of Coleoptera starts 1969. Over a period of 25 years investigations were made to explore the Coleoptera. One aspect was the influence of the red ants (Formica polyctena) as enemies of carabids.- Very important apparatures to study the structure and dynamic of several populations are pitfall traps, ground photoeclectors and arboreal photoeclectors. Within the catched beetle species above all Staphylinidae, Curculionidae, Scolytidae und Rhizophagidae are in the centre of interest. Important results yield also the investigation in different types offorests (exotic and indigenous wood­ land trees ), Anfang der zweiten Hälfte des vergangeneu Jahrhunderts begannen die gezielten Aufsammlungen von Käfern in den Wäldern des Staatsforstes Burgholz in Wupper­ tal und Solingen. Es war Hans-Ulrich TRIELE, der 1952 und 1953 die Aufnahme von Tierbeständen zur Erfassung der Tiergesellschaften in der Bodenstreu verschie­ dener Waldtypen des Niederbergischen Landes durchführte. Neun seiner insgesamt 27 Probeflächen befanden sich im Burgholz; dabei handelte es sich um Buchen­ Traubeneichen-Wälder, Fichten- und Lärchenaufforstungen. Hier ein Zitat aus sei­ ner einschlägigen Publikation: "Von allen in dieser Arbeit behandelten Tiergruppen stellen die Käfer die artenreichste dar.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Species 2010 the GENERAL STATUS of SPECIES in CANADA
    Wild Species 2010 THE GENERAL STATUS OF SPECIES IN CANADA Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council National General Status Working Group This report is a product from the collaboration of all provincial and territorial governments in Canada, and of the federal government. Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council (CESCC). 2011. Wild Species 2010: The General Status of Species in Canada. National General Status Working Group: 302 pp. Available in French under title: Espèces sauvages 2010: La situation générale des espèces au Canada. ii Abstract Wild Species 2010 is the third report of the series after 2000 and 2005. The aim of the Wild Species series is to provide an overview on which species occur in Canada, in which provinces, territories or ocean regions they occur, and what is their status. Each species assessed in this report received a rank among the following categories: Extinct (0.2), Extirpated (0.1), At Risk (1), May Be At Risk (2), Sensitive (3), Secure (4), Undetermined (5), Not Assessed (6), Exotic (7) or Accidental (8). In the 2010 report, 11 950 species were assessed. Many taxonomic groups that were first assessed in the previous Wild Species reports were reassessed, such as vascular plants, freshwater mussels, odonates, butterflies, crayfishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. Other taxonomic groups are assessed for the first time in the Wild Species 2010 report, namely lichens, mosses, spiders, predaceous diving beetles, ground beetles (including the reassessment of tiger beetles), lady beetles, bumblebees, black flies, horse flies, mosquitoes, and some selected macromoths. The overall results of this report show that the majority of Canada’s wild species are ranked Secure.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Appendix 3. Thousand Islands National Park Taxonomy Report
    Appendix 3. Thousand Islands National Park Taxonomy Report Class Order Family Genus Species Arachnida Araneae Agelenidae Agelenopsis Agelenopsis potteri Agelenopsis utahana Anyphaenidae Anyphaena Anyphaena celer Hibana Hibana gracilis Araneidae Araneus Araneus bicentenarius Larinioides Larinioides cornutus Larinioides patagiatus Clubionidae Clubiona Clubiona abboti Clubiona bishopi Clubiona canadensis Clubiona kastoni Clubiona obesa Clubiona pygmaea Elaver Elaver excepta Corinnidae Castianeira Castianeira cingulata Phrurolithus Phrurolithus festivus Dictynidae Emblyna Emblyna cruciata Emblyna sublata Eutichuridae Strotarchus Strotarchus piscatorius Gnaphosidae Herpyllus Herpyllus ecclesiasticus Zelotes Zelotes hentzi Linyphiidae Ceraticelus Ceraticelus atriceps 1 Collinsia Collinsia plumosa Erigone Erigone atra Hypselistes Hypselistes florens Microlinyphia Microlinyphia mandibulata Neriene Neriene radiata Soulgas Soulgas corticarius Spirembolus Lycosidae Pardosa Pardosa milvina Pardosa moesta Piratula Piratula canadensis Mimetidae Mimetus Mimetus notius Philodromidae Philodromus Philodromus peninsulanus Philodromus rufus vibrans Philodromus validus Philodromus vulgaris Thanatus Thanatus striatus Phrurolithidae Phrurotimpus Phrurotimpus borealis Pisauridae Dolomedes Dolomedes tenebrosus Dolomedes triton Pisaurina Pisaurina mira Salticidae Eris Eris militaris Hentzia Hentzia mitrata Naphrys Naphrys pulex Pelegrina Pelegrina proterva Tetragnathidae Tetragnatha 2 Tetragnatha caudata Tetragnatha shoshone Tetragnatha straminea Tetragnatha viridis
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Millipedes Along the Northern Western Ghats
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2014; 2 (4): 254-257 ISSN 2320-7078 Diversity of millipedes along the Northern JEZS 2014; 2 (4): 254-257 © 2014 JEZS Western Ghats, Rajgurunagar (MS), India Received: 14-07-2014 Accepted: 28-07-2014 (Arthropod: Diplopod) C. R. Choudhari C. R. Choudhari, Y.K. Dumbare and S.V. Theurkar Department of Zoology, Hutatma Rajguru Mahavidyalaya, ABSTRACT Rajgurunagar, University of Pune, The different vegetation type was used to identify the oligarchy among millipede species and establish India P.O. Box 410505 that millipedes in different vegetation types are dominated by limited set of species. In the present Y.K. Dumbare research elucidates the diversity of millipede rich in part of Northern Western Ghats of Rajgurunagar Department of Zoology, Hutatma (MS), India. A total four millipedes, Harpaphe haydeniana, Narceus americanus, Oxidus gracilis, Rajguru Mahavidyalaya, Trigoniulus corallines taxa belonging to order Polydesmida and Spirobolida; 4 families belongs to Rajgurunagar, University of Pune, Xystodesmidae, Spirobolidae, Paradoxosomatidae and Trigoniulidae and also of 4 genera were India P.O. Box 410505 recorded from the tropical or agricultural landscape of Northern Western Ghats. There was Harpaphe haydeniana correlated to the each species of millipede which were found in Northern Western Ghats S.V. Theurkar region of Rajgurunagar. At the time of diversity study, Trigoniulus corallines were observed more than Senior Research Fellowship, other millipede species, which supports the environmental determinism condition. Narceus americanus Department of Zoology, Hutatma was single time occurred in the agricultural vegetation landscape due to the geographical location and Rajguru Mahavidyalaya, habitat differences. Rajgurunagar, University of Pune, India Keywords: Diplopod, Northern Western Ghats, millipede diversity, Narceus americanus, Trigoniulus corallines 1.
    [Show full text]
  • HADULLA WAGNER 2016 Hundsbachtal
    Mitt. Arb.gem. Rhein. Koleopterologen (Bonn) 26 , 2016, 11–25 Zur Käferfauna (Coleoptera) der Blockhalden im Hundsbachtal bei Gerolstein Ergebnisse der Gemeinschaftsexkursionen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Rheinischer Koleopterologen im April 2013 KARL HADULLA & THOMAS WAGNER Kurzfassung: Im Naturschutzgebiet Hundsbachtal südwestlich von Gerolstein in der Eifel befindet sich in einer Blockschutthalde am Rande eines Basaltschlacken- vulkans ein bekannter Standort für Glazialrelikte der Tierwelt. Am 13. April 2013 fand eine Exkursion statt, während der auch Bodenfallen tief in den Blockschutt ausgebracht und zwei Wochen später eingeholt wurden. Es konnten insgesamt 210 Käferarten nachgewiesen werden, 24 in Bodenfallen und davon acht ausschließlich mit dieser Methode. Darunter waren eine Anzahl cavernicoler Arten, dabei auch Choleva lederiana als Erstfund für das Rheinland, sowie der blockhaldenspezifische Kurzflügler Leptusa simonii . Ein Wiederfund nach 50 Jahren für die Rheinprovinz ist Orthocerus clavicornis . Auf die taxonomisch-nomenklatorischen Änderungen von Choleva lederiana , deren Berücksichtigung in der Bestimmungsliteratur und ihre aktuelle mitteleuropäische Verbreitung, wird im Besonderen eingegangen. Abstract: The Nature Reserve „Hundsbachtal“ southwest of Gerolstein, Eifel moun- tains in Western Germany, has a large scree slope along an pleistocaene volcano and is a well known area for glacial relict species. During an excursion on 13th of April 2013 pitfall traps have been set most deeply in rubble that were collected two weeks later. Altogether 210 beetle species could be found, 24 in the pitfall traps, and eight of them exclusively with this method. Beyond the numerous cavernicolous beetles, many Choleva lederiana could be found for the first time in the Rhineland, further- more the scree slope typic staphylinid Leptusa simonii . As a recapture after fifty years in the Rhineland, Orthocerus clavicornis was found on gravel ground covered with lichens close to the mouth of the Hundsbach creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Diversity and Conservation in Old-Growth Northwest Forests'
    AMER. ZOOL., 33:578-587 (1993) Arthropod Diversity and Conservation in Old-Growth mon et al., 1990; Hz Northwest Forests complex litter layer 1973; Lattin, 1990; JOHN D. LATTIN and other features Systematic Entomology Laboratory, Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, tural diversity of th Corvallis, Oregon 97331-2907 is reflected by the 14 found there (Lawtt SYNOPSIS. Old-growth forests of the Pacific Northwest extend along the 1990; Parsons et a. e coastal region from southern Alaska to northern California and are com- While these old posed largely of conifer rather than hardwood tree species. Many of these ity over time and trees achieve great age (500-1,000 yr). Natural succession that follows product of sever: forest stand destruction normally takes over 100 years to reach the young through successioi mature forest stage. This succession may continue on into old-growth for (Lattin, 1990). Fire centuries. The changing structural complexity of the forest over time, and diseases, are combined with the many different plant species that characterize succes- bances. The prolot sion, results in an array of arthropod habitats. It is estimated that 6,000 a continually char arthropod species may be found in such forests—over 3,400 different ments and habitat species are known from a single 6,400 ha site in Oregon. Our knowledge (Southwood, 1977 of these species is still rudimentary and much additional work is needed Lawton, 1983). throughout this vast region. Many of these species play critical roles in arthropods have lx the dynamics of forest ecosystems. They are important in nutrient cycling, old-growth site, tt as herbivores, as natural predators and parasites of other arthropod spe- mental Forest (HJ cies.
    [Show full text]
  • UFRJ a Paleoentomofauna Brasileira
    Anuário do Instituto de Geociências - UFRJ www.anuario.igeo.ufrj.br A Paleoentomofauna Brasileira: Cenário Atual The Brazilian Fossil Insects: Current Scenario Dionizio Angelo de Moura-Júnior; Sandro Marcelo Scheler & Antonio Carlos Sequeira Fernandes Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências: Patrimônio Geopaleontológico, Museu Nacional, Quinta da Boa Vista s/nº, São Cristóvão, 20940-040. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Recebido em: 24/01/2018 Aprovado em: 08/03/2018 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11137/2018_1_142_166 Resumo O presente trabalho fornece um panorama geral sobre o conhecimento da paleoentomologia brasileira até o presente, abordando insetos do Paleozoico, Mesozoico e Cenozoico, incluindo a atualização das espécies publicadas até o momento após a última grande revisão bibliográica, mencionando ainda as unidades geológicas em que ocorrem e os trabalhos relacionados. Palavras-chave: Paleoentomologia; insetos fósseis; Brasil Abstract This paper provides an overview of the Brazilian palaeoentomology, about insects Paleozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic, including the review of the published species at the present. It was analiyzed the geological units of occurrence and the related literature. Keywords: Palaeoentomology; fossil insects; Brazil Anuário do Instituto de Geociências - UFRJ 142 ISSN 0101-9759 e-ISSN 1982-3908 - Vol. 41 - 1 / 2018 p. 142-166 A Paleoentomofauna Brasileira: Cenário Atual Dionizio Angelo de Moura-Júnior; Sandro Marcelo Schefler & Antonio Carlos Sequeira Fernandes 1 Introdução Devoniano Superior (Engel & Grimaldi, 2004). Os insetos são um dos primeiros organismos Algumas ordens como Blattodea, Hemiptera, Odonata, Ephemeroptera e Psocopera surgiram a colonizar os ambientes terrestres e aquáticos no Carbonífero com ocorrências até o recente, continentais (Engel & Grimaldi, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Bruchus Was Restricted by Schilsky (6
    THE HAIRY-VETCH BRUCHID, BRUCHUS BRACHIALIS FAHRAEUS, IN THE UNITED STATES ' By J. C. BRIDWELL, formerly Specialist in Bruchidae and Their Parasites, Division of Stored Product Insects^ Bureau of Entomology, and L. J. BOTTIMER, Assistant Entomologist^ Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Agriculture INTRODUCTION The genus Bruchus was restricted by Schilsky (6) ^ to include only the immediate allies of Bruchus pisorum (L.), the pea weevil, of which he tabulated 24 species knowQ to him. To these may be added others doubtfully distinct, imperfectly known, or more recently described, which increase the nominal species of the genus to a total of about 46. All these species are native to the Palearctic region. Two of them are already well known in the United States as major pests of the plants affected. B. pisorum was the first of the genus and one of the first species of the family to be recognized. It was described in 1752, and was recorded as having destroyed in the 1740's the flourishing colonial American industry of producing dry peas for ships' stores. B. ruß- manus Boheman, the broadbean weevil, has now practically destroyed the broadbean industry of Caüfornia. A third species, B, hrachialis Fahraeus, has in recent years gained a foothold in this country, for in 1931 the junior author found it heavily infesting the seeds of vetches growing in New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, and North Carolina, and in 1932 it was found in Virginia. In view of these facts it seems wise to present a brief summary of the knowledge at present available of the habits of the members of this genus and to point out the increased danger of their estabhshment in the United States as a result of changed commercial conditions.
    [Show full text]