DOCSLIB.ORG

Operating in a Mixed-Language Environment Using HDL, C/C++, Systemc and Systemverilog

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Operating in a Mixed-Language Environment Using HDL, C/C++, Systemc and Systemverilog Application Note Operating in a Mixed-language Environment Using HDL, C/C++, SystemC and SystemVerilog www.model.com Introduction Viewing the C model as a specification is, in fact, becoming common. C and C++ languages have an important role to play in ASIC design, and using these languages can significantly In practice, the C model can be used to generate tabular increase designer productivity. However, C and C++ cannot data files that can be compared to the output of the RTL be used entirely alone; they must work together with design at any intermediate partition in the design. The conventional HDLs (VHDL and Verilog), to create a mixed strength of this method is its ability to automate the HDL and C/C++ environment. The key to success when comparison of large numbers of pointed regressions employing a mixed environment in ASIC design is to or extended randomized tests. A simulation log can be choose and use the language that offers the most effective maintained to show precisely which test failed and what abstraction level for the task at hand. conditions caused the error. An important limitation arises, however, due to the need for cycle accuracy in the Traditionally, Verilog and VHDL have proven to deliver the C model—a specific set of assignments in the C model must best solution for describing hardware, because they provide map directly to a single clock cycle in the RTL model. Since an efficient abstraction for level- and edge-sensitive registers a clock cannot be readily generated in C, care must be taken and clock logic, arbitrary logic gates and larger elements of to ensure that all appropriate dependencies are considered clocked logic arranged in parallel. when ordering execution events. C and C++, on the other hand have been used for years This need for cycle accuracy is especially apparent when to describe higher-level system design, and to describe modeling asynchronous boundary behaviors. Many and implement new algorithms. System architects use designs prioritize transactions according to internal C models to evaluate new architectures without regard events that cross clock domain boundaries in the design. for implementation details, such as timing and hardware- Unfortunately, this can cause perfectly valid outcomes software partitioning. from the RTL design to appear out of order according to the predictive C data. Recently, SystemC was developed as a useful way to bridge the gap between what has been done traditionally with HDLs and what has been done in C. SystemC has all the Interfacing C to VHDL architectural capabilities of C (because it is C), and adds class libraries that allow HDL concepts to be included, such Interfacing C code to Verilog and VHDL can take as a time domain, event scheduling, clocks, concurrent many forms—some ad hoc and others operating under processes, etc. a standard. A standard interface for connecting C modules or functions Using C as the Design Specification to VHDL code is defined in the IEEE 1076-1993 standard. The most commonly employed method under the standard One of the main advantages of describing a design in is what are known as “foreign architectures.” These special C is that the C language is very powerful and easy to VHDL architectures do not have any executable VHDL implement complex objects. In addition, the designer can code in them. Instead, they contain a link to executable C compile it into a standalone object and quickly run it and code. At the beginning of the architecture, a foreign evaluate the results. Quick turnarounds can be made and re- attribute declaration appears, such as: evaluated on the fly. More important, however, is the fact architecture foreign_arch of my_module is that the resulting C model can be used for equivalency architecture foreign of foreign_arch: checking between C and RTL. Once a golden C model attribute is “init_func file.so”; is decided upon, HDL designers can begin the task of begin implementing it in RTL HDL. end; 2 Operating in a Mixed-language Environment Using HDL, C/C++, SystemC and SystemVerilog As you can see, there is no code between the begin and end The C code that interfaces to Verilog is defined and statements. The standard also specifies that if there were standardized by the IEEE 1364 standard and is called code between the begin and end statements it would not Verilog PLI (Programming Language Interface). Using the be executed. The C code referenced by the foreign attribute code example above, the PLI defines a mechanism in the declaration is called whenever this architecture needs to C code to specify which function to call when $my_task be evaluated—such as when one of the ports is responding is evaluated. To enhance designer productivity, many to input changes on the entity. simulators now include convenient shortcuts to simplify this mechanism. Unfortunately, these short cuts are not Although most simulators require the same basic portable across all simulators. Verilog’s interfacing method information to connect to the C code, the actual string is clearly more complex than the interface between C and for the foreign architecture specification is simulator VHDL. As an example of this complexity, the code below dependent. ModelSim uses the form init_function is the C structure that must be implemented to interface object_file. The (init_function) is the name of the function C code to Verilog. in the C code that the simulator calls when the design is typedef int (*p_tffn)(); being loaded into memory (elaboration). The object_file typedef struct t_tfcell { referenced in the string is the name of the compiled and short type;/* USERTASK, USERFUNCTION, dynamically linked C code. or USERREALFUNCTION */ An important note is that the IEEE standard does not short data;/* passed as data argument of define the actual procedural interface between the C and callback function */ VHDL; only the definition of the foreign architecture is p_tffn checktf; /* argument checking defined. Hence, C code is not portable between VHDL callback function */ simulators. p_tffn sizetf; /* function return size callback function */ p_tffn calltf; /* task or function call callback Interfacing C to Verilog function */ The C interface for Verilog is quite different than VHDL p_tffn misctf; /* miscellaneous reason and requires more of the designer, who must create an callback function */ almost-empty module that has the single, simple task of char *tfname;/* name of system task or function */ calling a “user-defined system task” that is implemented in int forwref; C. An example of Verilog interface code is: char *tfveritool; char *tferrmessage; module my_module ( <my_ports>…) int hash; . struct t_tfcell *left_p; $my_task( <my_ports…); struct t_tfcell *right_p; endmodule char *namecell_p; int warning_printed; } s_tfcell, *p_tfcell; In addition to defining a mechanism to interface C and Verilog, the PLI also defines and standardizes function calls between C code and the simulator, something that the VHDL/C interface does not have. This means that the PLI function call interface is portable across simulators, which is a big advantage for users, and especially IP providers. Operating in a Mixed-language Environment Using HDL, C/C++, SystemC and SystemVerilog 3 The disadvantage of the standardized interface is impaired mixed hierarchy of SystemC blocks and HDL blocks with performance. The PLI has a set of documented parameters no restrictions and no performance penalties. Full debug for all of the functions as well as the standardized data capabilities across all languages are available, as well. structures that hold information about the various design objects, and all simulators must use these conventions. For more information about ModelSim’s native SystemC Maintaining all of these data structures imposes a integration, please refer to the application note entitled significant performance penalty. For example, the simulator SystemC Verification with ModelSim. must copy pieces of design data requested by the PLI from the internal simulator’s data structures into the standard Interfacing C to SystemVerilog structures required by the PLI. This happens for every PLI access to the design and can be very expensive in SystemVerilog has arrived, and has many powerful terms of simulation time. features to improve hardware design. One of the new features is the definition of a new API to interface C to the SystemVerilog language. This new interface is called Interfacing SystemC to VHDL and Verilog the DPI (Direct Programming Interface). The DPI solves many of the C-to-HDL interface problems that occur SystemC has a powerful set of features that allow it to be today with VHDL and Verilog. In addition, SystemVerilog used for design models done in C, and design models done provides a consistent method for loading user’s C code, in VHDL or Verilog. However, it does not fully replace the unlike PLI/FLI, so the C code (and how it gets linked need for VHDL and Verilog. Most design work done with and loaded) is the same for all simulators. SystemC still requires a mix of SystemC and HDLs. A common usage model is to do the top-level design in One of the problems of FLI and PLI is that they are SystemC, and as the design implementation progresses, complex and not easy to use. To do even simple tasks lower-level blocks of the SystemC model are replaced by requires detailed knowledge of the interface, and requires VHDL or Verilog RTL implementations. Thus, to simulate a lot of C code to be written. Also, Verilog is able to call the entire design throughout the development process, it is C code via user-defined system tasks, but the C code can’t necessary to simulate the SystemC and HDL code together. call the Verilog code. The interface between SystemC and HDL is done in one The DPI was designed to be a natural inter-language of two ways: 1) the user codes his or her own interface function call interface between C and SystemVerilog.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prostep Ivip CPO Statement Template
    CPO Statement of Mentor Graphics For Questa SIM Date: 17 June, 2015 CPO Statement of Mentor Graphics Following the prerequisites of ProSTEP iViP’s Code of PLM Openness (CPO) IT vendors shall determine and provide a list of their relevant products and the degree of fulfillment as a “CPO Statement” (cf. CPO Chapter 2.8). This CPO Statement refers to: Product Name Questa SIM Product Version Version 10 Contact Ellie Burns [email protected] This CPO Statement was created and published by Mentor Graphics in form of a self-assessment with regard to the CPO. Publication Date of this CPO Statement: 17 June 2015 Content 1 Executive Summary ______________________________________________________________________________ 2 2 Details of Self-Assessment ________________________________________________________________________ 3 2.1 CPO Chapter 2.1: Interoperability ________________________________________________________________ 3 2.2 CPO Chapter 2.2: Infrastructure _________________________________________________________________ 4 2.3 CPO Chapter 2.5: Standards ____________________________________________________________________ 4 2.4 CPO Chapter 2.6: Architecture __________________________________________________________________ 5 2.5 CPO Chapter 2.7: Partnership ___________________________________________________________________ 6 2.5.1 Data Generated by Users ___________________________________________________________________ 6 2.5.2 Partnership Models _______________________________________________________________________ 6 2.5.3 Support of
    [Show full text]
  • Systemverilog
    SystemVerilog ● Industry's first unified HDVL (Hw Description and Verification language (IEEE 1800) ● Major extension of Verilog language (IEEE 1364) ● Targeted primarily at the chip implementation and verification flow ● Improve productivity in the design of large gate-count, IP- based, bus-intensive chips Sources and references 1. Accellera IEEE SystemVerilog page http://www.systemverilog.com/home.html 2. “Using SystemVerilog for FPGA design. A tutorial based on a simple bus system”, Doulos http://www.doulos.com/knowhow/sysverilog/FPGA/ 3. “SystemVerilog for Design groups”, Slides from Doulos training course 4. Various tutorials on SystemVerilog on Doulos website 5. “SystemVerilog for VHDL Users”, Tom Fitzpatrick, Synopsys Principal Technical Specialist, Date04 http://www.systemverilog.com/techpapers/date04_systemverilog.pdf 6. “SystemVerilog, a design and synthesis perspective”, K. Pieper, Synopsys R&D Manager, HDL Compilers 7. Wikipedia Extensions to Verilog ● Improvements for advanced design requirements – Data types – Higher abstraction (user defined types, struct, unions) – Interfaces ● Properties and assertions built in the language – Assertion Based Verification, Design for Verification ● New features for verification – Models and testbenches using object-oriented techniques (class) – Constrained random test generation – Transaction level modeling ● Direct Programming Interface with C/C++/SystemC – Link to system level simulations Data types: logic module counter (input logic clk, ● Nets and Variables reset, ● enable, Net type,
    [Show full text]
  • Powerpoint Template
    Accellera Overview February 27, 2017 Lu Dai | Accellera Chairman Welcome Agenda . About Accellera . Current news . Technical activities . IEEE collaboration 2 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative Our Mission To provide a platform in which the electronics industry can collaborate to innovate and deliver global standards that improve design and verification productivity for electronics products. 3 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 Broad Industry Support Corporate Members 4 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 Broad Industry Support Associate Members 5 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 Global Presence SystemC Evolution Day DVCon Europe DVCon U.S. SystemC Japan Design Automation Conference DVCon China Verification & ESL Forum DVCon India 6 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 Agenda . About Accellera . Current news . Technical activities . IEEE collaboration 7 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 Accellera News . Standards - IEEE Approves UVM 1.2 as IEEE 1800.2-2017 - Accellera relicenses SystemC reference implementation under Apache 2.0 . Outreach - First DVCon China to be held April 19, 2017 - Get IEEE free standards program extended 10 years/10 standards . Awards - Thomas Alsop receives 2017 Technical Excellence Award for his leadership of the UVM Working Group - Shrenik Mehta receives 2016 Accellera Leadership Award for his role as Accellera chair from 2005-2010 8 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc. February 2017 DVCon – Global Presence 29th Annual DVCon U.S. 4th Annual DVCon Europe www.dvcon-us.org 4th Annual DVCon India www.dvcon-europe.org 1st DVCon China www.dvcon-india.org www.dvcon-china.org 9 © 2017 Accellera Systems Initiative, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Simulation Between Cλash and Traditional Hdls
    MASTER THESIS CO-SIMULATION BETWEEN CλASH AND TRADITIONAL HDLS Author: John Verheij Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science (EEMCS) Computer Architecture for Embedded Systems (CAES) Exam committee: Dr. Ir. C.P.R. Baaij Dr. Ir. J. Kuper Dr. Ir. J.F. Broenink Ir. E. Molenkamp August 19, 2016 Abstract CλaSH is a functional hardware description language (HDL) developed at the CAES group of the University of Twente. CλaSH borrows both the syntax and semantics from the general-purpose functional programming language Haskell, meaning that circuit de- signers can define their circuits with regular Haskell syntax. CλaSH contains a compiler for compiling circuits to traditional hardware description languages, like VHDL, Verilog, and SystemVerilog. Currently, compiling to traditional HDLs is one-way, meaning that CλaSH has no simulation options with the traditional HDLs. Co-simulation could be used to simulate designs which are defined in multiple lan- guages. With co-simulation it should be possible to use CλaSH as a verification language (test-bench) for traditional HDLs. Furthermore, circuits defined in traditional HDLs, can be used and simulated within CλaSH. In this thesis, research is done on the co-simulation of CλaSH and traditional HDLs. Traditional hardware description languages are standardized and include an interface to communicate with foreign languages. This interface can be used to include foreign func- tions, or to make verification and co-simulation possible. Because CλaSH also has possibilities to communicate with foreign languages, through Haskell foreign function interface (FFI), it is possible to set up co-simulation. The Verilog Procedural Interface (VPI), as defined in the IEEE 1364 standard, is used to set-up the communication and to control a Verilog simulator.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Systemc Modules from HDL for System-On-Chip Applications
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2004 Development of SystemC Modules from HDL for System-on-Chip Applications Siddhartha Devalapalli University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Devalapalli, Siddhartha, "Development of SystemC Modules from HDL for System-on-Chip Applications. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2004. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2119 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Siddhartha Devalapalli entitled "Development of SystemC Modules from HDL for System-on-Chip Applications." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Electrical Engineering. Dr. Donald W. Bouldin, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Dr. Gregory D. Peterson, Dr. Chandra Tan Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Siddhartha Devalapalli entitled "Development of SystemC Modules from HDL for System-on-Chip Applications".
    [Show full text]
  • Lattice Synthesis Engine User Guide and Reference Manual
    Lattice Synthesis Engine for Diamond User Guide April, 2019 Copyright Copyright © 2019 Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. All rights reserved. This document may not, in whole or part, be reproduced, modified, distributed, or publicly displayed without prior written consent from Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (“Lattice”). Trademarks All Lattice trademarks are as listed at www.latticesemi.com/legal. Synopsys and Synplify Pro are trademarks of Synopsys, Inc. Aldec and Active-HDL are trademarks of Aldec, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Disclaimers NO WARRANTIES: THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS “AS IS” WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY OF ANY KIND INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY, NONINFRINGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT WILL LATTICE OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER (WHETHER DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, OR LOSS OF INFORMATION) ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF OR INABILITY TO USE THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS DOCUMENT, EVEN IF LATTICE HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. BECAUSE SOME JURISDICTIONS PROHIBIT THE EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION OF CERTAIN LIABILITY, SOME OF THE ABOVE LIMITATIONS MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU. Lattice may make changes to these materials, specifications, or information, or to the products described herein, at any time without notice. Lattice makes no commitment to update this documentation. Lattice reserves the right to discontinue any product or service without notice and assumes no obligation to correct any errors contained herein or to advise any user of this document of any correction if such be made.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Emulation of Systemc
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Emulation of SystemC Applications for Portable FPGA Binaries A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science by Scott Spencer Sirowy June 2010 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Frank Vahid, Chairperson Dr. Tony Givargis Dr. Sheldon X.-D. Tan Copyright by Scott Spencer Sirowy 2010 The Dissertation of Scott Spencer Sirowy is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Emulation of SystemC Applications for Portable FPGA Binaries by Scott Spencer Sirowy Doctor of Philosophy, Graduate Program in Computer Science University of California, Riverside, June 2010 Dr. Frank Vahid, Chairperson As FPGAs become more common in mainstream general-purpose computing platforms, capturing and distributing high-performance implementations of applications on FPGAs will become increasingly important. Even in the presence of C-based synthesis tools for FPGAs, designers continue to implement applications as circuits, due in large part to allow for capture of clever spatial, circuit-level implementation features leading to superior performance and efficiency. We demonstrate the feasibility of a spatial form of FPGA application capture that offers portability advantages for FPGA applications unseen with current FPGA binary formats. We demonstrate the portability of such a distribution by developing a fast on-chip emulation framework that performs transparent optimizations, allowing spatially-captured FPGA applications to immediately run on FPGA platforms without costly and hard-to-use synthesis/mapping tool flows, and sometimes faster than PC-based execution. We develop several dynamic and transparent optimization techniques, including just-in-time compilation , bytecode acceleration , and just-in-time synthesis that take advantage of a platform’s available resources, resulting in iv orders of magnitude performance improvement over normal emulation techniques and PC-based execution.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Verilog Hardware Description Language
    3. VERILOG HARDWARE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGE The previous chapter describes how a designer may manually use ASM charts (to de- scribe behavior) and block diagrams (to describe structure) in top-down hardware de- sign. The previous chapter also describes how a designer may think hierarchically, where one module’s internal structure is defined in terms of the instantiation of other modules. This chapter explains how a designer can express all of these ideas in a spe- cial hardware description language known as Verilog. It also explains how Verilog can test whether the design meets certain specifications. 3.1 Simulation versus synthesis Although the techniques given in chapter 2 work wonderfully to design small machines by hand, for larger designs it is desirable to automate much of this process. To automate hardware design requires a Hardware Description Language (HDL), a different nota- tion than what we used in chapter 2 which is suitable for processing on a general- purpose computer. There are two major kinds of HDL processing that can occur: simu- lation and synthesis. Simulation is the interpretation of the HDL statements for the purpose of producing human readable output, such as a timing diagram, that predicts approximately how the hardware will behave before it is actually fabricated. As such, HDL simulation is quite similar to running a program in a conventional high-level language, such as Java Script, LISP or BASIC, that is interpreted. Simulation is useful to a designer because it allows detection of functional errors in a design without having to fabricate the actual hard- ware. When a designer catches an error with simulation, the error can be corrected with a few keystrokes.
    [Show full text]
  • Version Control Friendly Project Management System for FPGA Designs
    Copyright 2016 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. This paper was published in Proceedings of SPIE (Proc. SPIE Vol. 10031, 1003146, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2247944 ) and is made available as an electronic reprint (preprint) with permission of SPIE. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for com- mercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper are prohibited. 1 Version control friendly project management system for FPGA designs Wojciech M. Zabołotnya aInstitute of Electronic Systems, Warsaw University of Technology, ul. Nowowiejska 15/19, 00-665 Warszawa, Poland ABSTRACT In complex FPGA designs, usage of version control system is a necessity. It is especially important in the case of designs developed by many developers or even by many teams. The standard development mode, however, offered by most FPGA vendors is the GUI based project mode. It is very convenient for a single developer, who can easily experiment with project settings, browse and modify the sources hierarchy, compile and test the design. Unfortunately, the project configuration is stored in files which are not suited for use with Version Control System (VCS). Another important problem in big FPGA designs is reuse of IP cores. Even though there are standard solutions like IEEE 1685-2014, they suffer from some limitations particularly significant for complex systems (e.g. only simple types are allowed for IP-core ports, it is not possible to use parametrized instances of IP-cores).
    [Show full text]
  • (System)Verilog to Chisel Translation for Faster Hardware Design Jean Bruant, Pierre-Henri Horrein, Olivier Muller, Tristan Groleat, Frédéric Pétrot
    (System)Verilog to Chisel Translation for Faster Hardware Design Jean Bruant, Pierre-Henri Horrein, Olivier Muller, Tristan Groleat, Frédéric Pétrot To cite this version: Jean Bruant, Pierre-Henri Horrein, Olivier Muller, Tristan Groleat, Frédéric Pétrot. (System)Verilog to Chisel Translation for Faster Hardware Design. 2020 31th International Symposium on Rapid System Prototyping (RSP), Sep 2020, VIrtual Conference, France. hal-02949112 HAL Id: hal-02949112 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02949112 Submitted on 25 Sep 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. (System)Verilog to Chisel Translation for Faster Hardware Design Jean Bruant∗;y, Pierre-Henri Horreinz, Olivier Mullery, Tristan Groleat´ x and Fred´ eric´ Petrot´ y OVHcloud, ∗Paris, zLyon, xBrest, France yUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP1, TIMA, Grenoble, France Abstract—Bringing agility to hardware developments has been target, we also successfully use it into our production FPGA- a long-running goal for hardware communities struggling with based network functions at OVHcloud. limitations of current hardware description languages such as (System)Verilog or VHDL. The numerous recent Hardware Chisel introduces many features and concepts intended Construction Languages such as Chisel are providing enhanced to improve hardware design efficiency which are especially ways to design complex hardware architectures with notable useful for the design of complex IPs and in large projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Quartus II Projects 1 2013.11.4
    Managing Quartus II Projects 1 2013.11.4 QII52012 Subscribe Send Feedback The Quartus II software organizes and manages the elements of your design within a project. The project encapsulates information about your design hierarchy, libraries, constraints, and project settings. Click File > New Project Wizard to quickly create a new project and specify basic project settings When you open a project, a unified GUI displays integrated project information. The Project Navigator allows you to view and edit the elements of your project. The Messages window lists important information about project processing. You can save multiple revisions of your project to experiment with settings that achieve your design goals. Quartus II projects support team-based, distributed work flows and a scripting interface. Quick Start To quickly create a project and specify basic settings, click File > New Project Wizard. © 2013 Altera Corporation. All rights reserved. ALTERA, ARRIA, CYCLONE, HARDCOPY, MAX, MEGACORE, NIOS, QUARTUS and STRATIX words and logos are trademarks of Altera Corporation and registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and in other countries. All other words and logos identified as trademarks or service marks are the property of their respective holders as described at ISO www.altera.com/common/legal.html. Altera warrants performance of its semiconductor products to current specifications in accordance with 9001:2008 Altera's standard warranty, but reserves the right to make changes to any products and services at any time without notice. Altera assumes Registered no responsibility or liability arising out of the application or use of any information, product, or service described herein except as expressly agreed to in writing by Altera.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardware Description Languages Compared: Verilog and Systemc
    Hardware Description Languages Compared: Verilog and SystemC Gianfranco Bonanome Columbia University Department of Computer Science New York, NY Abstract This library encompasses all of the necessary components required to transform C++ into a As the complexity of modern digital systems hardware description language. Such additions increases, engineers are now more than ever include constructs for concurrency, time notion, integrating component modeling by means of communication, reactivity and hardware data hardware description languages (HDLs) in the types. design process. The recent addition of SystemC to As described by Edwards [1], VLSI an already competitive arena of HDLs dominated verification involves an initial simulation done in by Verilog and VHDL, calls for a direct C or C++, usually for proof of concept purposes, comparison to expose potential advantages and followed by translation into an HDL, simulation of flaws of this newcomer. This paper presents such the model, applying appropriate corrections, differences and similarities, specifically between hardware synthesization and further iterative Verilog and SystemC, in effort to better categorize refinement. SystemC is able to shorten this the scopes of the two languages. Results are based process by combining the first two steps. on simulation conducted in both languages, for a Consequently, this also decreases time to market model with equal specifications. for a manufacturer. Generally a comparison between two computer languages is based on the number of Introduction lines of code and execution time required to achieve a specific task, using the two languages. A Continuous advances in circuit fabrication number of additional parameters can be observed, technology have augmented chip density, such as features, existence or absence of constructs consequently increasing device complexity.
    [Show full text]