DOCSLIB.ORG

A Dark Age for Medicine?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Dark Age for Medicine? ON THE ORIGINS OF THE MODERN CONCEPT OF SYPHILIS EIGHTEENTH CENTURY DEBATE, LUDWIK FLECK, AND THE ENLIGHTENMENT A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History and Philosophy of Science Teneille Humphris University of Canterbury 2013 Abstract The enlightenment period is often considered a dark age within the history of medicine. Contrary to this sentiment, I argue that the enlightenment spirit of inquiry regarding venereal disease was vibrant, dynamic, and profoundly influenced how syphilis was understood in the subsequent century. Historiography frequently minimises advances of medical knowledge made in the eighteenth century by focusing on the inefficacy of treatments, rather than on developments in medical theories and concepts. This thesis attends to this gap by examining a case study within venereology to demonstrate that physicians engaging in public debate significantly advanced knowledge of syphilis. In doing so, this counters a historiographical trend that claims that French physician Philippe Ricord (1800-1889) was the first to distinguish syphilis from gonorrhoea in the nineteenth century. It uses historical evidence to show that the nature of syphilis was debated throughout the preceding centuries and that this distinction was clearly established in 1793 by Scottish surgeon, Benjamin Bell (1749-1806). This thesis uses the epistemic concepts devised by Ludwik Fleck in his Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact (1979 [1935]) to illustrate how enlightenment ways of thinking substantially contributed to the development of modern medicine. This thesis therefore invites a reconsideration of the era, not as a dark age, but as a rich period of scientific endeavour. ii Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................................... ii Contents ................................................................................................................................................................................................ iii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................................ v 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 The nineteenth century: the dawn of modern medicine? ............................................................................... 1 1.2 The unenlightened eighteenth century? ................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Problem statement .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Argument ............................................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.5 Significance of this study ............................................................................................................................................... 7 1.6 The enlightenment ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.7 Theoretical framework ................................................................................................................................................ 11 1.8 Parameters ........................................................................................................................................................................ 11 1.9 Terminology ..................................................................................................................................................................... 12 1.10 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................................................... 13 2. The current scientific understAnding of syphilis ................................................................ 14 2.1 Biology ................................................................................................................................................................................ 15 2.2 Syndrome identification .............................................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Related diseases .............................................................................................................................................................. 19 2.4 Paleopathology ................................................................................................................................................................ 20 2.5 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................................................... 21 3. Prominent themes in the history of syphilis ........................................................................ 22 3.1 The origins of the first outbreak in Europe ......................................................................................................... 22 3.2 Associations with morality ......................................................................................................................................... 29 3.3 Treatment .......................................................................................................................................................................... 31 3.4 Identifying syphilis ........................................................................................................................................................ 32 3.5 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................................................... 35 4. On the nature of syphilis: historiography, Bell, and Ricord ............................................ 37 4.1 The debate ......................................................................................................................................................................... 38 4.2 Historiography: Ricord as a pioneer ...................................................................................................................... 39 4.3 Philippe Ricord ................................................................................................................................................................ 43 4.4 Nineteenth century recognition of eighteenth century debate ................................................................... 45 4.5 Benjamin Bell and knowledge of syphilis in the eighteenth century ........................................................ 48 4.6 Discussion.......................................................................................................................................................................... 54 4.7 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................................................... 56 5. Ludwik Fleck’s central epistemic concepts........................................................................... 58 iii 5.1 Fleck’s life experience .................................................................................................................................................. 58 5.2 Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact .................................................................................................... 60 5.3 Central concepts ............................................................................................................................................................. 64 5.4 Discussion and research questions ......................................................................................................................... 70 5.5 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................................................... 72 6. Proto-ideas and enlightenment thinking .............................................................................. 73 6.1 Proto-ideas ........................................................................................................................................................................ 74 6.2 A harmony of illusions: ingenious methods of resisting Bell's theory ..................................................... 76 6.3 Bell’s theory and the tenacity of systems of opinions ..................................................................................... 78 6.4 The significance of enlightenment thinking about syphilis .......................................................................... 81 6.5 Evaluation of proto-ideas for historical analyses ............................................................................................. 83 6.6 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1. Canongate 1.1. Background Canongate's Close Proximity to The
    Edinburgh Graveyards Project: Documentary Survey For Canongate Kirkyard --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Canongate 1.1. Background Canongate’s close proximity to the Palace of Holyroodhouse, which is situated at the eastern end of Canongate Burgh, has been influential on both the fortunes of the Burgh and the establishment of Canongate Kirk. In 1687, King James VII declared that the Abbey Church of Holyroodhouse was to be used as the chapel for the re-established Order of the Thistle and for the performance of Catholic rites when the Royal Court was in residence at Holyrood. The nave of this chapel had been used by the Burgh of Canongate as a place of Protestant worship since the Reformation in the mid sixteenth century, but with the removal of access to the Abbey Church to practise their faith, the parishioners of Canongate were forced to find an alternative venue in which to worship. Fortunately, some 40 years before this edict by James VII, funds had been bequeathed to the inhabitants of Canongate to erect a church in the Burgh - and these funds had never been spent. This money was therefore used to build Canongate Kirk and a Kirkyard was laid out within its grounds shortly after building work commenced in 1688. 1 Development It has been ruminated whether interments may have occurred on this site before the construction of the Kirk or the landscaping of the Kirkyard2 as all burial rights within the church had been removed from the parishioners of the Canongate in the 1670s, when the Abbey Church had became the chapel of the King.3 The earliest known plan of the Kirkyard dates to 1765 (Figure 1), and depicts a rectilinear area on the northern side of Canongate burgh with arboreal planting 1 John Gifford et al., Edinburgh, The Buildings of Scotland: Pevsner Architectural Guides (London : Penguin, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • PASSAGES of MEDICAL HISTORY. Edinburgh Medicine, 1750-1800.*
    PASSAGES OF MEDICAL HISTORY. Edinburgh Medicine, 1750-1800.* By JOHN D. COMRIE, M.A., B.Sc., M.D., F.R.C.P.Ed. In my ten-minute talk last May about the Edinburgh medical school I dealt with the founding of the Royal College of Physicians, the botanic garden, and the expansion of the Town's College into the University of Edinburgh through the establishment of a medical faculty in 1726. In the second half of the eighteenth century the medical school at Edinburgh became much more than a local institution, and not only attracted students from all over the British Isles, but was the chief centre to which men desiring to study medicine had recourse from the newly-founded British colonies through- out the world. Several of the teachers were men who attained great reputations. Dr Robert Whytt succeeded John Rutherford as professor both of the theory and practice of medicine in 1747, and was appointed largely because he was interested in medical research, a rare pursuit in those days. Stone in the bladder was a serious and frequent complaint which attracted great public interest and produced many reputed solvents for these calculi. Whytt had carried out an elaborate series of experiments in the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh with lime water, which he found to have a considerable power in disintegrating calculi, and he had published A n Essay on the Virtues of Lime Water and Soap in the Cure of the Stone. The treatment upon which he finally settled was to administer daily by the mouth water. He an ounce of soap and three pints or more of lime also published An Essay on the Vital and Other Involuntary Motions of Animals which brought him into conflict with the great Albrecht von Haller and gained him prominent notice on the Continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Radesykens Tilblivelse
    Radesykens tilblivelse Historien om en sykdom Anne Kveim Lie Levert som avhandling for graden dr.med. Institutt for allmenn- og samfunnsmedisin Universitetet i Oslo 2007 © Anne Kveim Lie, 2008 Doktoravhandlinger forsvart ved Det medisinske fakultet, Universitetet i Oslo. No. 606 ISBN 978-82-8072-459-5 Det må ikke kopieres fra denne boka i strid med åndsverkloven eller med avtaler om kopiering inngått med Kopinor, interesseorgan for rettighetshavere til åndsverk. Omslag: Inger Sandved Anfinsen. Trykk og innbinding: AiT e-dit AS, Oslo, 2008. Produsert i samarbeid med Unipub AS, Oslo. Avhandlingen blir kun produsert av Unipub AS i forbindelse med disputas. Alle henvendelser vedrørende avhandlingen skal rettes til rettighetshaver eller enheten der doktorgrad er forsvart. Unipub AS er et heleid datterselskap av Akademika AS, som eies av Studentsamskipnaden i Oslo. INNHOLDSFORTEGNELSE INTRODUKSJON 7 1. HVA ER EN SYKDOMS HISTORIE, OG HVORDAN SKRIVE DEN?11 2.TIDLIGERE HISTORIER OM RADESYKEN 24 PROLOG: OPPRINNELSE 30 1. FORTELLINGER OM BEGREPETS OPPRINNELSE 31 2. SYKDOMMENS OPPRINNELSESHISTORIER 38 2.1. DET RUSSISKE ORLOGSSKIPET 41 2.2. ALTERNATIVE SAMTIDIGE FORTELLINGER OM RADESYKENS OPPRINNELSE 44 2.3. DE FREMMEDE 55 2.4. MORALSKE UNIVERS 58 2.5. AVSLUTNING:OPPRINNELSESHISTORIENES FUNKSJON 60 3. KONKLUSJON 67 DEL I 69 1. DEN MEDISINSKE OPPLYSNING 70 1.2. RADESYKEVERKENE SOM DEN NORSKE MEDISINSKE OPPLYSNING 73 1.3. PRESENTASJON AV VERKENE 79 1.4. SKJØRBUK, SPEDALSKHET, VENERISK SYKDOM 84 2. NOSOLOGIEN 88 2.1. RADESYKEN I DET NOSOLOGISKE SKJEMA 96 3. TILFÆLDE OG KIENDETEGN 102 3.1. RADESYKEN SOM ET SETT AV KJENNETEGN 106 3.2. DEN MEDISINSKE SEMIOTIKK SOM GRUNNLAG FOR MEDISINSK PRAKSIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Founding Fellows
    Founding Members of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Alexander Abercromby, Lord Abercromby William Alexander John Amyatt James Anderson John Anderson Thomas Anderson Archibald Arthur William Macleod Bannatyne, formerly Macleod, Lord Bannatyne William Barron (or Baron) James Beattie Giovanni Battista Beccaria Benjamin Bell of Hunthill Joseph Black Hugh Blair James Hunter Blair (until 1777, Hunter), Robert Blair, Lord Avontoun Gilbert Blane of Blanefield Auguste Denis Fougeroux de Bondaroy Ebenezer Brownrigg John Bruce of Grangehill and Falkland Robert Bruce of Kennet, Lord Kennet Patrick Brydone James Byres of Tonley George Campbell John Fletcher- Campbell (until 1779 Fletcher) John Campbell of Stonefield, Lord Stonefield Ilay Campbell, Lord Succoth Petrus Camper Giovanni Battista Carburi Alexander Carlyle John Chalmers William Chalmers John Clerk of Eldin John Clerk of Pennycuik John Cook of Newburn Patrick Copland William Craig, Lord Craig Lorentz Florenz Frederick Von Crell Andrew Crosbie of Holm Henry Cullen William Cullen Robert Cullen, Lord Cullen Alexander Cumming Patrick Cumming (Cumin) John Dalrymple of Cousland and Cranstoun, or Dalrymple Hamilton MacGill Andrew Dalzel (Dalziel) John Davidson of Stewartfield and Haltree Alexander Dick of Prestonfield Alexander Donaldson James Dunbar Andrew Duncan Robert Dundas of Arniston Robert Dundas, Lord Arniston Henry Dundas, Viscount Melville James Edgar James Edmonstone of Newton David Erskine Adam Ferguson James Ferguson of Pitfour Adam Fergusson of Kilkerran George Fergusson, Lord Hermand
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial of the Clan of the Bells, More
    MEMORIAL OF TH! CLAh OF THE BELLS. 1864. Az-^tj^ ^ &U- Ti4/*w*~t-L*&*. f^p^X^c National Library of Scotland *B0001 96756* Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from National Library of Scotland http://www.archive.org/details/memorialofclanof1864bell '<«£& *, #$£: mmtmstt ©f. t$e €lan of |g $£**& fiHon parttcularlu of tfje J3([iH$ of Jcirferonnfl |B€iH$ of JBInrbrffonsr, djhiefs of in<| gam^. 5)Srintcb ^risatelt) anb cnh) fcr a feto ftrtcnw iRiseeeiLSJiF. The following pages are printed for the purpose of obviating the liability entailed by possession of a few scraps and sketches. Under a vague idea of paying a compliment, those who know of such a collection may often request copies, and time and trouble must be expended if a graceful refusal cannot be substituted. Wherefore, as preferable, the cost of printing and the trouble of making woodcuts have been, once for all, incurred ; and he who criticizes the primitive roughness of the latter may try to do better with a bradawl and any wood except box, or remember the proverb anent " the gift horse." The Rammerscales MS. speaks for itself. It is now given iu blackletter type, and quasi antique form; but otherwise, not even a comma has been intentionally added to or taken from the copy. As to the Notes, a distance of some thousands of miles from probable sources of information will explain many imperfections, readily removable by any one more happily situated. U note*, l&mrnmsltn JRanusrriut, JUtno %*- ©opg of an oltr |KS, in tf>e Hifcrarg of tfje last Bell of Eammerscales, saitr to ftatoe been toritten about t&e seat: 1692.
    [Show full text]
  • Benjamin Bell (1749-1806)
    Benjamin Bell (1749-1806) Reference and contact details: GB779 RCSEd GD/70 Location: RS L3 (boxed with unrelated items) Title: Benjamin Bell wax seal Dates of Creation: 19th century Held at: The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh Extent: 1 small box Name of Creator: R. Sommervaille & JLB Bell Language of Material: English. Level of Description: item Administrative/Biographical History: Mr John L. B. Bell of Islington, London has kindly presented yet another Bell family related object, additional to the Joseph Bell robes etc. This is a red wax seal impression of Benjamin Bell (1749-1806) by R. Sommervaille in a bespoke wooden box. The gift includes research work by Mr John L. B. Bell, the donor. Received here December 2011. Benjamin Bell (1749- 1806) Until the latter half of the 18th century, the influence of Edinburgh surgeons was largely confined to Scotland. Some members of the Incorporation like Archibald Pitcairn and Alexander Munro primus had established European reputations, the former in the field of medicine and the latter in anatomy . It was Benjamin Bell, regarded by many as the “father of the Edinburgh Surgical School", who was the first to establish an international reputation for Edinburgh Surgery. Working in Edinburgh in the age of the Scottish Enlightenment, Benjamin Bell was truly a son of that Enlightenment. A polymath, original thinker, and innovator, he was the first to publish a comprehensive surgical text book in the English language. Like two other sons of the Enlightenment, Allan Ramsay and Thomas Carlisle, Bell was born in Dumfriesshire. After local schooling he was apprenticed to Mr James Hill, surgeon in Dumfries, and in 1766 entered the Edinburgh Medical School.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Fellows Biographical Index Part
    Former Fellows of The Royal Society of Edinburgh 1783 – 2002 Biographical Index Part One ISBN 0 902 198 84 X Published July 2006 © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 22-26 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 2PQ BIOGRAPHICAL INDEX OF FORMER FELLOWS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH 1783 – 2002 PART I A-J C D Waterston and A Macmillan Shearer This is a print-out of the biographical index of over 4000 former Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh as held on the Society’s computer system in October 2005. It lists former Fellows from the foundation of the Society in 1783 to October 2002. Most are deceased Fellows up to and including the list given in the RSE Directory 2003 (Session 2002-3) but some former Fellows who left the Society by resignation or were removed from the roll are still living. HISTORY OF THE PROJECT Information on the Fellowship has been kept by the Society in many ways – unpublished sources include Council and Committee Minutes, Card Indices, and correspondence; published sources such as Transactions, Proceedings, Year Books, Billets, Candidates Lists, etc. All have been examined by the compilers, who have found the Minutes, particularly Committee Minutes, to be of variable quality, and it is to be regretted that the Society’s holdings of published billets and candidates lists are incomplete. The late Professor Neil Campbell prepared from these sources a loose-leaf list of some 1500 Ordinary Fellows elected during the Society’s first hundred years. He listed name and forenames, title where applicable and national honours, profession or discipline, position held, some information on membership of the other societies, dates of birth, election to the Society and death or resignation from the Society and reference to a printed biography.
    [Show full text]
  • William Acton on Sexual Behaviour
    1 William Acton and Medical Discourse in Mid-Nineteenth Century Britain Submitted by Madeleine Prudence Morgan to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History, April 2011 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. ......................................................................................... 2 Abstract This thesis presents the life and work of the physician William Acton from his education and medical training in Paris up to the introduction of the Contagious Diseases Acts. This thesis aims to re-visit Acton‟s two works on sexual function and sexual behaviour Prostitution, Considered in Its Moral, Social and Sanitary Aspects, in London and Other Large Cities. With Proposals for Mitigation and Prevention of Its Attendant Evils and The Functions and Disorders of the Reproductive Organs in Childhood, Youth, Adult Age and Advanced Life Considered in Their Physiological, Social and Moral Relations in order to understand Acton‟s intellectual development up to the middle of his career. The overarching theme of Acton‟s work identifies the necessity of regulation on a public and private level of sexual dysfunction. Acton‟s studies of prostitution and of sexual dysfunction in the male both conclude that the effective treatment of diseases such as syphilis and spermatorrhoea was not the intervention of medical curatives, but the regulation of the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Osis, Francis (2021) the Venereal Poison: a Historic and Genetic Analysis of Categories of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 1718-1850
    Osis, Francis (2021) The venereal poison: a historic and genetic analysis of categories of sexually transmitted diseases, 1718-1850. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/82215/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] The Venereal Poison: A Historic and Genetic Analysis of Categories of Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 1718- 1850 Francis Osis (B.Sc.) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Humanities College of Arts University of Glasgow Abstract 1 Abstract During the first half of the eighteenth century, the monolithic term ‘venereal disease’ or lues venerea covered all signs and symptoms of diseases transmitted through sex. In 1766, Francis Balfour – a medical student at the University of Edinburgh – suggested that lues venerea could actually be divided into two separate diseases, each caused by a unique contagion: syphilis and gonorrhoea. This opened a debate that continued for decades, between the monists, who believed that syphilis and gonorrhoea were merely symptoms of the same disease, and the dualists, who believed that the two should be separated.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN BELL, I763-I820* by E
    JOHN BELL, I763-I820* by E. W. WALLS JOHN Bell was a Lowland Scot, born in 1762, the second of four sons of a somewhat elderly, and certainly impoverished, clergyman. Set forth thus, his origins seem humble enough, but when reference is made to his ancestry it becomes abundantly clear that he sprang from a stock which for upwards of two centuries had made its mark upon the affairs of Scotland.' John Bell's father, the Rev. William Bell, was a man of considerable moral courage who, on the dictates of conscience, transferred his allegiance from the Church of Scotland to the Episcopal Church in Scotland-a big step in those days, and one which brought great financial hardship in the years following Culloden and the failure of the Stuart cause to which the Episcopal Church had been sympathetic. His strength of character he handed on in full to John, and indeed to all his sons, each of whom was destined to win renown in his chosen career. Robert, the eldest, became Professor of Conveyancing to the Society of Writers to the Signet; George occupied the Chair of Scots Law in Edinburgh University, and was an acknowledged master of commercial jurisprudence; while of Charles it is surely not necessary to say one word. Of their mother we learn most from the correspondence which Charles con- ducted with George over many years. Well-educated for her day, she had in- herited the artistic gift of her grandfather, Bishop White, and in due course this was to reveal itself anew in John and Charles.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN BELL, I763-I820* by E
    JOHN BELL, I763-I820* by E. W. WALLS JOHN Bell was a Lowland Scot, born in 1762, the second of four sons of a somewhat elderly, and certainly impoverished, clergyman. Set forth thus, his origins seem humble enough, but when reference is made to his ancestry it becomes abundantly clear that he sprang from a stock which for upwards of two centuries had made its mark upon the affairs of Scotland.' John Bell's father, the Rev. William Bell, was a man of considerable moral courage who, on the dictates of conscience, transferred his allegiance from the Church of Scotland to the Episcopal Church in Scotland-a big step in those days, and one which brought great financial hardship in the years following Culloden and the failure of the Stuart cause to which the Episcopal Church had been sympathetic. His strength of character he handed on in full to John, and indeed to all his sons, each of whom was destined to win renown in his chosen career. Robert, the eldest, became Professor of Conveyancing to the Society of Writers to the Signet; George occupied the Chair of Scots Law in Edinburgh University, and was an acknowledged master of commercial jurisprudence; while of Charles it is surely not necessary to say one word. Of their mother we learn most from the correspondence which Charles con- ducted with George over many years. Well-educated for her day, she had in- herited the artistic gift of her grandfather, Bishop White, and in due course this was to reveal itself anew in John and Charles.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Surgical Heritage: Great Scots of Anatomy and Surgery Rao R Ivatury
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Our Surgical Heritage: Great Scots of Anatomy and Surgery Rao R Ivatury ABSTRACT Background: The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, established in 1505 as the Barber Surgeons of Edinburgh was one of the oldest medical organizations in the world. Materials and methods: Literature review of the history of great Scottish surgeons of the 18th and 19th centuries and their accomplishments. Conclusion: Edinburgh and Scotland in the 18th and 19th centuries were renowned for their cutting-edge medicine and surgery. Clinical significance: A history of our surgical heritage. Keywords: Historical review, Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, Scottish anatomists and surgeons, Surgeons’ Hall museums. Panamerican Journal of Trauma, Critical Care & Emergency Surgery (2021): 10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1315 INTRODUCTION Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, The author was invited to deliver the 2018 annual “Sir Astley Cooper Virginia, USA Lecture” by the British Hernia Society in Edinburgh, Scotland. The Corresponding Author: Rao R Ivatury, Department of Surgery, Virginia topic was “reflections on the open abdomen”. The preparation Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA, Phone: +1 804 for this occasion recalled that open abdomen was an original 6511575, email: [email protected] contribution by a great surgeon of Scottish origin, Sir Heneage How to cite this article: Ivatury RR. Our Surgical Heritage: Great Scots Ogilvie.1,2 The chance to learn about pioneer Scottish Surgeons of Anatomy and Surgery. Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg and their remarkable contributions to the evolution of modern 2021;10(1):8–15. science led to further research. The visits to the Royal Infirmary Source of support: Nil and the Surgeons’ Hall museums3 were awe-inspiring as was the Conflict of interest: None history of Scottish surgery.
    [Show full text]