Addendum to Analysis of Submissions report: Conditions Requested Addendum to Analysis of Submissions report: Section 7 Conditions Requested
This report completes Section 7 of the Analysis of Submissions report for the East West Link Proposal.
Notes:
Each submitter is referenced by either their organisation name, or both their surname(s), and first initial(s). Each submitter has also been assigned an EPA submitter reference number for administrative purposes.
Italics have been used to highlight where comments are an exact copy of the condition requested or relief sought as it was in the original submission.
Where multiple submitters requested the same, they have been compiled together in a single row, with each relevant submitter identified.
April 2017 List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location 8 Sylvia Park Road Body 126453 A westbound lane must be provided for access to 8 Sylvia Park Road Submitter specific 8 Sylvia Park Road Corporate A new condition should require ongoing consultation with AT in respect of the effects of the proposal on Airport- 126354 Auckland Transport Consultation - specific Airport Mangere MRT and AMETI.
Fisher and Paykel Healthcare Review to ensure that 180° turns accessing or leaving the Alfred St over-bridge are not too tight for cyclists to 126311 Paths - manoeuvrability Alfred Street Cycling Community negotiate whilst passing others travelling in the opposite direction.
Ensure that the various walking and cycling overbridges (particularly Sector 2 at Alfred Street and Sector 3 over Alfred Street (Sector 2) 126253 Bike Auckland Great South Road) provide enough space and large enough path radii to allow safe u-turns at the bottom of the Paths - manoeuvrability Great South Road (Sector 3) ramps for users wanting to go in the other direction at the path-path intersection.
Additional conditions should be imposed once detailed design plans are available to avoid/minimise impacts 126336 Auckland Council during vulnerable life stages of species (e.g. breeding season of birds, migration of (diadromous) fish species, Ecology - fauna All spawning season benthic species etc...). Re-align the EWL in the vicinity of Ann’s Creek or alternatively provide evidence to justify why the alignment cannot 126336 Auckland Council Alternatives Anns Creek be moved to the north of Anns Creek. The Council seeks that the project be amended to, as much as possible, minimise ecological impacts. In particular, the effects of the proposal on the significant ecological areas within Anns Creek, and the dredging for reclamation 126336 Auckland Council Ecology Anns Creek material which in the Council’s opinion would have significant physical and ecological impact, needs to be minimised. 126327; 126328; Oliver, B; Oliver, W; Avoid any distbrance to Anns Creek and its immediate surrounds Environment Anns Creek 126325 Read, E The project must avoid any disturbances to Ann's Creek and its immediate surrounds. Ecology Anns Creek The area to be elevated be extended from Ann's Creek to beyond Ward Demolition property. This will eliminate the 126334 Downer NZ Limited Alternatives Ann's Creek need to disturb the Pikes Point East landfill and associated leachate drains. That the proposed link road that bisects Green Vision Recycling's site to the current inland port be moved from its 126334 Downer NZ Limited Alternatives Ann's Creek current location to Ann's Creek Estuary with an elevated on/off ramp syste.
Ann's Creek; Neilson Street; The Council requests further information on the alternatives to understand the impacts on the key 126336 Auckland Council Alternatives Galyway Link; Hugo Johnston areas: Anns Creek, Neilson Street, SH20 and the Galway Link, Hugo Johnston Drive, Great South Road intersection Drive; Great South Road
Auckland Studio Potters Auckland Studio Potters 126258 Seeking a parking solution for members and students to continue serving community as they have Submitter specific Society Society Dedicated protected cycle lanes and cycle friendly features should be provided up Captain Springs Rd to and Fisher and Paykel Healthcare through the Neilson St intersection. Also, cycle lanes should be added east-west through the Neilson St 126311 Paths - separated cycle paths Captain Springs Road Cycling Community intersection and cycle storage boxes should be added forward of the traffic stop lines to assist cyclists traversing this intersection. Organ Piano & Keyboard 126114 Consider Alfred Street and an alternative to Captain Springs Road Alternatives Captain Springs Road Society of Auckland Inc. Organ Piano & Keyboard 126114 Allow and provide parking as per requested in the OPKSA submission Submitter specific Captain Springs Road Society of Auckland Inc. I request that the EPA rejects the proposal in its entirety, and encourage the EPA to suggest that the NZTA 126243 Steel, C considers an alternative design that upgrades the existing Church St/Nielsen St route, and combines this with Alternatives Church St/Neilsen St upgrades to the Onehunga branch line as an alternative. 126234 Wackrow, T & D Protection of the coastal environment Environment - coastal CMA Clarify whether the shared path bridge link between Deas Place and Mataroa Road is to become a road in the Deas Place and Mataroa Road 126253 Bike Auckland short or long term (noting the designs showing a much wider cross-section on the bridge deck), and how this Paths (Sector 5) affects cycling conditions and cycling facility design on this section, and on the nearby public roads.
Buckels, E; Buckels, J; I call on the Board to instruct NZTA to include East Tamaki/Highbrook, as originally planned, in the East West 126729; 126518; 126563 Alternatives East Tamaki/Highbrook Buckels, K Connection plans Provision is made for traffic to travel between East West Link and the South Eastern Highway without having to EWL with South Eastern 126484 Tram Lease Limited Traffic - local roads use the local and arterial road network in the vicintity of Sylvia Park Road Highway
Auckland Council - Māngere- The Local Board wants the Favona Walkway to be included in this development to leverage different sources of 126336 Alternatives Favona Walkway Ōtāhuhu Local Board funding including Growth Funding to complete the walkway around the Mangere Inlet. Ashurst, R; Cummuskey, P; 126158; 126317; 126208; Waterfront access should be maintained and provided Access Foreshore Luijken, P; The'value add' benefits of the reclamation of the CMA, stormwater treatment areas, and naturalised coastal edge 126277 Auckland Business Forum and recreational space should be suitably communicated to the public (in particular, the proposed reclamation will Consultation Foreshore help clean up and this should be noted)
126277 Auckland Business Forum Have no traffic lights at intersections on the foreshore route. Design Foreshore
Bateman, R; Bateman, S; 126182; 126248; 126135; I seek to see the project modified to include a restoration reclamation along the Onehunga foreshore between Bosson, T; Brighouse, N; Coastal Processes - 126183; 126244; 126226; Taumanu Reserve and the Port of Onehunga, so as to provide amenity space for the growing population of Foreshore Gibson, N; Harries, T; King, reclamation 126265; 126133; Onehunga. M; Palmer, G;
Bridging over and under the highway should be carried out in a manner that naturalises pedestrian and service 126317 Cummuskey, P Access Foreshore vehicle (i.e. ambulances) flow and does not create physical and psychological barriers to such access. 126231 Hood, S No road of any sort should be permitted along the Manukau foreshore Alternatives Foreshore 126249 Lacey, R Enhance the Manukau foreshore as a public amenity Environment - coastal Foreshore
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location Mathews, S; Mathews, S; For the cycle and pedestrian tracks along Sector 2 foreshore, include embankments and plantings between the 126391; 126390; 126458; Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac Paths - landscape Foreshore proposed new wetlands and the road. Residents; Ngati Te Ata (Te Ara Rangatu Alter the design to restore the previously lost natural coastal environment along the foreshore between Taumanu 126320 o Te Iwi o Ngati Te Ata Environment - coastal Foreshore Reserve and the Port of Onehunga Waiohua Inc)
The pedestrian and cycling link needs to continue to be an off leash dog area, limit wooden board walk areas aling this route as this restricts the dogs and makes it more difficult for cyclists to get past. Maintain the large grassy areas beside the path so that the dogs can run and remain out of the way of cyclists. Ensure that this area is safe, 126099 White, K Facilities Foreshore the bush currently acts as a natural barrier to the industrial area and main roads on the other side. Ensure that there are park benches along the path for people to rest and take the view. Consider the dogs that use the area and narrow board walks are not the answer.
Our preference is to remove our existing dwelling and construct a new dwelling of the same size futher back on the 126169 Uelese M & U Submitter specific Frank Grey Place, Otahuhu site.
126169 Uelese M & U We would also like an on site turning area so that we can enter and exit the site in a forward direction Submitter specific Frank Grey Place, Otahuhu
126169 Uelese M & U If the Board of Inquiry is cannot meet the aboce they seek that the NZTA purchase their propoerty outright. Submitter specific Frank Grey Place, Otahuhu
That the NZTA undertakes and provides to the Council micro-simulation modelling of the EWL and local road network at intersections around the Galway Link Road, Onehunga Wharf and Onehunga 126336 Auckland Council Further information Galway Link Mall area to demonstrate the capability of the proposed design to operate at an appropriate ‘Level of Service’.
That NZTA provide a layout that delivers the required network capacity and connectivity in the area 126336 Auckland Council Further information Galway Link surrounding Galway Street and Alfred Street. Realign the Galway Street connection to separate from Onehunga Harbour Road and relate to the 126336 Auckland Council Alternatives Galway Street Onehunga urban grid rather than follow the proposed curvilinear configuration. Consider an alternative design for the Galway Street/Onehunga Mall and Harbour Road intersection to provide 126336 Auckland Council improved functionality for all modes, including convenience and amenity for pedestrians and cyclists, between the Alternatives Galway Street Onehunga Town Centre and the wharf area.
Amend the project to: Relocate the footpath which is to the north of the EWL and between Galway and Alfred 126336 Auckland Council Paths Galway Street Streets further from the kerb edge and up the slope to ensure a higher level of amenity for pedestrians. 126336 Auckland Council Provide for a pedestrian crossing facility at the Galway Street intersection with the EWL. Paths Galway Street NZTA is to accommodate a crossing point to enable pedestrians to cross from Galway St to the commuter 126336 Auckland Council Paths Galway Street cycleway on the coastal side of the EWL.
NZTA is to clarify crossing points on all plans to enable an accurate picture of the walking/cycling network 126336 Auckland Council Paths Galway Street incorporating the Council’s desired connections in the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Greenways Plan. The permanent loss of esplanade reserve land is not compensated for by temporary boardwalk structures in the 126336 Auckland Council coastal marine area therefore NZTA is to work with the Council to identify works elsewhere upon affected land to Paths Galway Street address the effects.
DWG Number AEE-AL-103 from Plan Set 3 of the NZTA supplied EWL drawing Register, there should be no four The Campaign for Better 126255 lane arterial road alignment between distance marker 850 and marker 1200. In addition the extension of Galway Alternatives Galway Street Transport Inc Street to intersect with this arterial road alignment at distance marker 1000 should not be implemented.
The NZTA is to minimise the amount of land acquisition to maximise the area available for active sport use and 126336 Auckland Council Acquisition Gloucester Park park development.
The Council asks for general repairs/maintenance to be undertaken and services to be connected to the building (wastewater) as mitigation for the loss of heritage values and amenity caused by the new road alignment. The 126336 Auckland Council Council is of the opinion that any new utilities/infrastructure to be connected to/through the Aotea Sea Scouts’ Aotea Sea Scouts - Heritage Gloucester Park building should be undertaken in consultation with Auckland Council Heritage Unit to take into account effects on the building and its scheduled extent of place.
NZTA is to provide plans which show the extent of available car parking following construction and what is 126336 Auckland Council Aotea Sea Scouts - information Gloucester Park currently available.
If the Sea Scouts building remains in situ, NZTA is to investigate the feasibility of undergrounding the 126336 Auckland Council transmission tower and servicing of the building to enable sufficient car parking for repurposing of the Aotea Sea Scouts - information Gloucester Park building.
If the building is to be relocated, this must be done in consultation with the Council with NZTA to cover all costs 126336 Auckland Council Aotea Sea Scouts - relocate Gloucester Park including regulatory, consultation and process costs.
The NZTA should undertake all practical measures to retain the mature trees impacted by the proposal or 126336 Auckland Council Arboriculture Gloucester Park alternatively relocate these within an agreed location within the park or surrounding areas 126336 Auckland Council Landscape design should involve a consultation and approval process with the Council. Consultation - specific Gloucester Park
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location The NZTA is to build and fund two sport fields, associated facilities, lighting and carparking at Gloucester Park North and make this facility operational prior to the occupation of Waikaraka Park to offset the construction 126336 Auckland Council Facilities - sports Gloucester Park related effects and inability of council to deliver planned sports fields at Waikaraka Park during the construction phase. The NZTA is to liaise with Council to determine type and nature of the sports fields.
A ball fence in Gloucester Park North is to be constructed to prevent balls travelling from the park onto State 126336 Auckland Council Highway 20. The final design of the ball fence is to be visually as ‘light’ as possible. The design should be located Facilities - sports Gloucester Park and finalised with the Council prior to construction.
Provide three-dimensional drawings of the EWL and its relation to the Sea Scout building and Orpheus Drive, and the overbridge and Neilson Street connection and views towards that from representative public viewpoints. This 126336 Auckland Council Further information Gloucester Park should also show landscape and surface treatments (including proposed parking areas) and shading analysis to determine the effects of the EWL configuration on the Sea Scouts building.
The Council seeks pedestrian links to the area be retained and enhanced wherever possible, such as links to 126336 Auckland Council Paths Gloucester Park Onehunga Port, Gloucester Park North and South and the walking/cycling network.
Auckland Council - Māngere- The Board seek further advice on how best it can support the Aotea Sea Scouts building, in context to the 126336 Further information Gloucester Park Ōtāhuhu Local Board upcoming development to ensure that the building’s historical elements are preserved. Auckland Council - 126336 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local The Sea Scouts building is to be maintained in accordance with its heritage status. Aotea Sea Scouts - Heritage Gloucester Park Board Bateman, R; Bateman, S; 126182; 126248; 126135; I seek to see a clear conservation plan included for the Historic Aotea Sea Scout building, so if it remains or if it is Bosson, T; Brighouse, N; Aotea Sea Scouts - 126183; 126244; 126226; moved it is brought up to standard as part of the project, as reparation to Aotea Sea Scouts and for future Gloucester Park Gibson, N; Harries, T; King, conservation 126265; 126133; generations to enjoy. M; Palmer, G; Bosson, T; Brighouse, N; 126135; 126183; 126244; Amend the proposal to ensure the Aotea Sea Scouts are properly catered for with either the provision of a new Gibson, N; Harries, T; King, Aotea Sea Scouts - relocate Gloucester Park 126226; 126265; 126133 building or relocation of the existing building to a location and requirements that Aotea Sea Scouts agree to. M; Palmer, G;
126167 Burt, O Restrict removal of Aotea Scouts building with access to Gloucester Park re. underground tunnel Aotea Sea Scouts - relocate Gloucester Park NZTA should be required to stick to their commitment for the retention and protection of the Aotea Sea Scout 126589 Duncan, C Aotea Sea Scouts - protect Gloucester Park building.
126087 Lee, J Relocate the Aotea Sea Scouts building Aotea Sea Scouts - relocate Gloucester Park
126884 Murray, P The Aotea Sea Scouts heritage building should be protected. Aotea Sea Scouts - Heritage Gloucester Park
TOES; Day, M; Dymond, J; Farrell, F; Furness, S; Fyfe Various; 126580; 126584; Group Ltd; Gregory, S; 126837; 126758; 126242; Heaton, J; Jobe, N; Laurent, 126379; 126540; 126446; I call on the Board of Inquiry to instruct NZTA to use an alternative design for the Gloucester Park Interchange in M; Lee, N; Llewellyn, J; 126301; 126486; 126825; consultation with the community. Reconsider and redesign the interchange using alternative designs and Alternatives Gloucester Park Mimmack, J; Mitchell, C; 126538; 126560; 126832; construction methods to better avoid, remedy and mitigate the adverse effects of the propsed project. Owens, A; Williams, A; 126556; 126631; 126523; Thomson, A; Sloan, E; 126182; 126248 Skelton, C; Bateman, R; Bateman, S
TOES; Farrell, F; Furness, S; Various; 126837; 126758; Fyfe Group Ltd; Gregory, S; 126242; 126719; 126379; As part of the delivery of the East West Link project I would like a positive outcome for my community and a Heaton, J; Jobe, N; Lane, G; Alternatives Gloucester Park 126450; 126796; 126446; community-lead design of the Gloucester Park Interchange could achieve this. Laurent, M; Lee, N; Mitchell, 126301; 126538; 126832; C; Williams, S;
126234 Wackrow, T & D Redesign of Gloucester Park Interchange for improved connection between Onehunga and the Port and Harbour. Alternatives Gloucester Park
Jackson Electrical Industries The existing Gloucester Park road be raised to the same height as the Jackson site carpark and the land sold 126349 Submitter specific Gloucester Park Road Limited to Jackson Electrical Industries.
Jackson Electrical Industries The newly created Gloucester Park slip road onto the Jackson site be utilised to provide entry and exiting 126349 Submitter specific Gloucester Park Road Limited through Gloucester Park onto Selwyn St for large vehicles.
Recognise the critical importance of the proposed grade separated intersection at Great South Road to reducing 126277 Auckland Business Forum Design Great South Road congestion and ensuring full motorway-to-motorway functionality of the new route. The Council requires further information on the reasoning for the provision of a grade separated intersection at 126336 Auckland Council Further information Great South Road this location.
Maintain the location of the Great South Road embankment and flyover as far south as is possible on the TR Group 126886 Dilworth Trust Board site to the south of Dilworth’s site to avoid existing depot yard space thus minimising the disruption to TR Group Submitter specific Great South Road during construction and reducing the amount of useable land taken from TR Group and Dilworth.
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location Ensure space for a dedicated protected cycle lane along each side of Great South Rd through the intersection with Fisher and Paykel Healthcare 126311 Sylvia Park Rd. These cycle lanes should run the full length to the NOR boundaries, including over the rail bridge. Paths - separated cycle paths Great South Road Cycling Community The rail bridge widening needs to account for this now as it will not be added later.
NZ Heavy Haulage Evaluate how to allow for overdimension loads or extra height loads through the finished project area long Great 126376 Traffic - heavy loads Great South Road Association South Road, Sylvia Park Road, Mt Wellington Highway and along the EWL road between SH1 and SH20 NZ Heavy Haulage Evaluate and ensure the Westfield Rail overbridge on Great South Road has the structural capacity to allow for 126376 Traffic - heavy loads Great South Road Association overweight loads Modify the notice of requirement to remove the EWL overpass at Great South Road and provide for an at grade 126326 Stratex Group Limited Design Great South Road intersection Recognise the scarcity and value of the land and location to TR Group as an existing land owners and established 126338 TR Group Ltd business by minimising construction disruption and limiting the designation to land actually required for the EWL Construction - disruption Great South Road structures, or in connection with them. Maintain the location of the Great South Road embankment and flyover as far south as is possible on the TR Group 126338 TR Group Ltd site to avoid existing depot yard space, thus minimising the disruption to TR Group during construction and Design Great South Road reducing the amount of useable land taken from TR Group. Recognise the business impact to affected land owners and users both during project construction and longer 126338 TR Group Ltd term because of the project, and ensure appropriate engagement and management procedures to minimise Submitter specific Great South Road business disruption are agreed and put in place before works commence. In the completion of the project works (e.g., by way of site specific final design condition), provide legal and 126338 TR Group Ltd physical access to, and use of, all areas suitable for use for truck/trailer storage under the flyover and to the south Submitter specific Great South Road of the works (including the construction site on the Stage 2 footprint). Provide evidence on whether the designation in front of the Rakon premises is designed to cater for off-road 126336 Auckland Council Facilities - parking Hamlins Hill parking, and if not, ensure that adequate public parking opportunities are provided.
Various; 126829; 126580; TOES; Clark, K; Day, M; 126837; 126758; 126242; Farrell, F; Furness, S; Fyfe I call on the Board of Inquiry to instruct NZTA to alter the proposed design to appropriately restore the previously 126719; 126379; 126828; Group Ltd; Heaton, J; Keane, lost natural coastal environment along the Onehunga foreshore between Taumanu Reserve and the Port of Mitigation Harbour 126604; 126796; 126446; J; Kelly, J; Lane, G; Laurent, Onehunga. 126622; 126546; M; Wright, K; Ranjan, R;
Address access design and parking requirements to ensure sufficient and frequent provision for access to and from 126336 Auckland Council Access Harbour the coast is available for pedestrians, cyclists and Council staff/maintenance contractors.
Conditions requiring the use of methods to contain and restrict the dispersal of sediment discharges from 126336 Auckland Council Coastal Processes Harbour dredging, declamation and reclamation works (e.g. via silt fences surrounding the entire area of works). Clarification of the form of the mudcrete areas (cross sections) and more investigation of alternative materials to 126336 Auckland Council Coastal Processes Harbour prevent weathering. Ensure that the conditions on the project ensure that coastal bunds around the proposed wetland areas are 126336 Auckland Council initially as low as possible (not more than RL3.4), and increase in height incrementally in combination with planned Coastal Processes - bunds Harbour maintenance and as sea level rise occurs over future decades.
126336 Auckland Council Avoid or minimise dredging to the greatest extent practicable. Coastal Processes - dredging Harbour Provide further analysis of the erosive areas and potential contaminant release from dredging, and propose any 126336 Auckland Council Coastal Processes - dredging Harbour necessary conditions to adequately mitigate adverse effects. The reclamation landscape and engineering design be undertaken in consultation and agreed with the Council Coastal Processes - 126336 Auckland Council Harbour prior to construction. reclamation Redesign the form of the headlands and the extent of walkways and cycleways so that a smaller area of Coastal Processes - 126336 Auckland Council Harbour reclamation is required. reclamation Provide evidence in relation to the Mangere Inlet edge proposed contours, and the intended location, scale and 126336 Auckland Council type of large scale and bulk planting in a form that can be used to help understand the experience for road users, Environment - coastal Harbour and the quality of views towards the road.
126336 Auckland Council Provide acoustic treatment immediately adjacent to the carriageway to address noise towards the new facility. Noise and Vibration Harbour
Enable greater connection and accessibility to the coastal edge in general and the new coastal path by: a. Widening the proposed land bridge to extend as far west as the ‘New Old Mangere Bridge’ and provide a street connection down into Onehunga Wharf; b. Providing an appropriate street connection at Alfred Street; c. Providing for pedestrian and cycle access across the EWL from all north-south streets; d. Ensuring that the intersection 126336 Auckland Council Paths Harbour design allows for pedestrian crossing across Captain Springs Road at the EWL intersection; e. Introducing a number of ‘coastal access areas’ accessed from the light controlled intersections on the EWL, each with limited carparking to support recreational and maintenance access, and provide Universal Access; and f. Providing a new pedestrian and cycle way along the Miami Stream from the EWL to Miami Parade.
Provide additional connections between the edge of the EWL and the longest sections of the boardwalk coastal 126336 Auckland Council Paths Harbour path to provide for means of access to (and potential escape from) these sections of the path. 126336 Auckland Council Address lack of variation of alignment on some very long straight sections of the boardwalk. Paths Harbour 126336 Auckland Council Apply and implement CPTED principles and ensure safety for path users. Paths Harbour 126336 Auckland Council Hard pave the proposed gravel path surface to be suitable for all types of cycle users. Paths Harbour
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location Develop the design of the shared pedestrian and cycle path between Onehunga Wharf and Taumanu Reserve to be 126336 Auckland Council wider and of high amenity that is consistent with the quality of paths and environment in Taumanu Reserve and on Paths - landscape Harbour the intended coastal path along the Mangere Inlet.
The NZTA is to redesign the reclamations to provide improved access and open space function with a 126336 Auckland Council contiguous land based walkway. Where boardwalks are required, they should be designed and aligned to Reclamation Harbour maximise user experience and minimise personal safety risks in accordance with CPTED principles.
Auckland Council - The transmission lines and pylons create visual pollution in the harbour. We would like to see these pylons 126336 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Utilities - undergrounding Harbour removed and power cabling to be installed in an environmentally sensitive manner. Board Bateman, R; Bateman, S; 126182; 126248; 126135; I seek to see the plan revised to include remediation action to ensure the harbour is dredged, in and around the Bosson, T; Brighouse, N; 126183; 126244; 126226; Port of Onehunga, and dredged mud used for mudcrete in creating reclamation land, locking up contaminants and Coastal Processes - dredging Harbour Gibson, N; Harries, T; King, 126265; 126133; restoring the harbour. M; Palmer, G; Bateman, R; Bateman, S; 126182; 126248; 126135; Bosson, T; Brighouse, N; I seek to see the Port of Onehunga developed as a public space, and where parts of the proposal impact negatively 126183; 126244; 126226; Landscape Design Harbour Gibson, N; Harries, T; King, on this that these be amended. 126265; 126133; M; Palmer, G; Bateman, R; Bateman, S; 126182; 126248; 126135; I seek to see the new footpaths along the Mangere Inlet, east of the bridge, suitably screened from the new road Bosson, T; Brighouse, N; 126183; 126244; 126226; with embankments and plantings similar to Taumanu Reserve, so that the wetlands and footpaths can remain a Paths - landscape Harbour Gibson, N; Harries, T; King, 126265; 126133; tranquil space where people can enjoy the harbour and wildlife without the noise and visual pollution of the road. M; Palmer, G; 126167 Burt, O There should be no cost to the rate payer when the Port is returned by NZTA Economics Harbour Construction of the highway link along the shore should include geotechnical works to remediate as much of the 126317 Cummuskey, P polluted coastal fill material as possible, and put in place engineered features to mitigate or ideally prevent the Coastal Processes - pollution Harbour leaching of further contaminants into the harbour. Rare geological features such as the lava outcrops at the north-eastern end of the Mangere Inlet, and other 126317 Cummuskey, P Environment - geological Harbour volcanic cones should be preserved and not sacrificed for the sake of the project. If an embankment fill is the final solution for the section adjacent to our property, the embankment shall be 126334 Downer NZ Limited constructed further out in the Mangere inlet to minimise disruption to our site and to preserve the limited Alternatives Harbour industrial land available. Makaurau Marae Maori Further information is sought as to whether reclamation and dredging can be avoided or reduced and mitigated, Coastal Processes - 126569 Harbour Trust and proposed conditions for same. reclamation The mauri of the water to the Mangere Inlet the Manukau Harbour is enhanced and robust protocols 126383 Ngai Tai ki Tamaki Cultural Harbour implemented to ensure no further contamination
Samson Corporation Ltd and Conditions in relation to minimising effects of the construction and operation of the road on the coastal Coastal Processes - 126276 Harbour Sterling Nominees Ltd environment are important and necessary. The management plans will be sufficient for this purpose. construction I call on the Board of Inquiry to instruct NZTA to discuss and negotiate specifically with Te Ākitai Waiohua the Te Akitai Waohua Waka 126332 effects of the project on Te Hopua a Rangi/Geddes Basin and the Manukau harbour to ensure its cultural values Consultation - cultural Harbour Taua Society are recognised.
I call on the Board of Inquiry to add conditions to the consent for the part of the proposal I have submitted on in Te Akitai Waohua Waka 126332 relation to Te Hopua a Rangi/Geddes Basin and the Manukau harbour and also for NZTA to take into consideration Cultural Harbour Taua Society the future Manukau Harbour Treaty of Waitangi settlement claim as a part of the Notice of Requirement.
I call on the Board of Inquiry to instruct NZTA to provide a substantive strategy and plan presented to Te Ākitai Te Akitai Waohua Waka Waiohua and other Mana Whenua of Tāmaki Makaurau with an interest in the Manukau harbour on how the 126332 Cultural Harbour Taua Society project will make allowances for future Treaty of Waitangi settlement negotiations with the Crown. If NZTA has no such strategy or plan in place to deal with Treaty of Waitangi matters, TAWWTS objects in full to the project.
The alignment for the EWL will only utilise the area between Chainage 3100 and Chainage 3850 as shown on Plan Auckland Heliport Limited The design and alignment of the EWL must be modified and/or the heliport relocated as necessary to avoid or 126324 AEE-AL-106 (attached) if the existing Heliport operated by AHLP has been relocated at NZTA's expense to an Submitter specific Heliport Partnership mitigate adverse effects on the AHLP heliport. alternative location to the satifaction of Auckland Heliport Limited Partnership
No excavated material, fill, or construction material may be stockpiled or deposited under any Transpower Transpower New Zealand transmission line such that it reduces the conductor to ground clearance (under worst case conditions) to less than Henderson, Otahuhu, Penrose, 126378 Utilities Limited the following distance vertically: a) Henderson - Otahuhu A: 7.5m; b) Penrose - Mt Roskill A: 6.5m; c) Mangere - Mt Mt Roskill, Mangere Roskill A: 6.5m. 126156 Kozlova, L NZTA should include a Highbrook connection with the EWL Alternatives Highbrook Confirm the necessity for the carparking area proposed in the planted area to the west of Hugo Johnston Drive. If 126336 Auckland Council parking is necessary, its location, extent and configuration should be reconsidered and a CPTED assessment should Facilities - parking Hugo Johnston Drive be provided. The Council requests that the combined parking and turning facility on Hugo Johnston Road be 126336 Auckland Council Facilities - parking Hugo Johnston Drive relocated or the form be amended to provide improved amenity for all users. 126336 Auckland Council The Council requests confirmation of the nature and suitability of the EWL/Hugo Johnston Drive link. Further information Hugo Johnston Drive Just Water International 126168 Reconsider the ability to park cars on both sides of Hugo Johnston Drive south of Autumn Place. Facilities - parking Hugo Johnston Drive Limited Confirmation that works near Hugo Johnston Drive will not reduce the capacity of existing stormwater settling 126152 Oji Fibre Solutions Environment Hugo Johnston Drive ponds, diminish the quality of groundwater, disrupt services e.g. wastewater.
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location Provide more detailed consideration of the impacts of the EWL to safe traffic movements at, and through, the 126152 Oji Fibre Solutions Traffic Hugo Johnston Drive northern end of Hugo Johnston Drive and make neccesary changes before commencing works
Appropriately recognise and remember Kāretu Portage including with signage and interpretative information on 126336 Auckland Council the portage area, structure design and in particular, the design beneath the viaduct structures through Anns Paths Karetu Portage Creek, as well as well as landscaping to provide for the legibility of this historic link at Sylvia Park Road.
Provide evidence on proposed concepts for recognition and acknowledgement of the Kāretu Portage and the 126336 Auckland Council Cultural Karetu Portage commitment to contribution of Mana Whenua in the establishment of artworks in this area. Provide stair access to the Kāretu Portage Path at Great South Road to complement the ramp access there, and 126336 Auckland Council provide for egress from the route. In planning this consider the entire length of the elevated path with respect to Paths Karetu Portage convenient access and egress for safety. 126336 Auckland Council Ensure the design and materiality of the structure mitigates potential vandalism. Paths Karetu Portage Conditions should set out a process of engagement and approvals with AT for the design of specific locations 126354 Auckland Transport where the project interfaces the existing local road network addressing: transport mitigation measures as Consultation - specific Local Roads discussed above; asset standards, ownership and transfers; and approval process and engagement with AT.
126354 Auckland Transport Proposed condition DC.5 should specifically address the removal of the designation from local roads Design Local Roads A condition should grant approval to AT under sections 176(1)(b) and 178(2) of the RMA to undertake its routine 126354 Auckland Transport Submitter specific Local Roads activities and works within local roads affected by designations. Bateman, R; Bateman, S; 126182; 126248; 126135; I seek to see the plan revised so as to reduce delays in vehicles going through Onehunga streets. The plan as it Bosson, T; Brighouse, N; 126183; 126244; 126226; stands is said to reduce traffic volumes, but includes measures such as more trafficlights to deter trucks. This adds Traffic - local roads Local Roads Gibson, N; Harries, T; King, 126265; 126133; back delays that the reduction in traffic is supposed to remove. M; Palmer, G;
The Board calls for the work programme for this project to be implemented now. A bridge is important to both Auckland Council - Māngere- Mangere Bridge and Onehunga businesses as it draws locals from near and afar to enjoy this pathway, and 126336 Facilities Mangere Bridge Ōtāhuhu Local Board supporting patronage to local cafés and shopping areas. To enhance this experience the Board calls for improved visibility (more lighting), and better footbridge access for walkers and cyclists.
Bateman, R; Bateman, S; 126182; 126248; 126135; I seek to see the old Mangere Bridge replacement properly assessed as part of the proposal with road and light rail Bosson, T; Brighouse, N; 126183; 126244; 126226; options included, and a lifting section, so as to alievate traffic on SH20 by diverting local traffic across this new Alternatives Mangere Bridge Gibson, N; Harries, T; King, 126265; 126133; bridge. M; Palmer, G; I call on the Board of Inquiry to instruct NZTA to build a lifting bridge between Onehunga and Mangere Bridge for 126242 Fyfe Group Ltd Design Mangere Bridge buses, local traffic, cyclists, and pedestrians Kirk, B; Mangere Bridge Residents and Ratepayers 126198; 126598; 126602 NZTA should include a new low level traffic bridge with the proposal Alternatives Mangere Bridge Association; Mangere Historic Society I seek to see the old Mangere Bridge replacement properly assessed as part of the proposal, with road and light 126196 Read, L rail options included, and with a lifting section. This would alieviate traffic on SH 20 by diverting local traffic across Design Mangere Bridge the new bridge. The north bound traffic going to Mt Wellington from Mangere Bridge (suburb) must go under the existing 126031 Sloan, M Design Mangere Bridge Mangere Bridge. The construction will be done with a minimum traffic disruption. Assessment of the old Mangere Bridge to be included as part of the road and light rail options to include a lifting 126146 Wallbridge, L & A Future - rail Mangere Bridge section to alleviate traffic on SH20 by diverting local traffic across the new bridge. New footpaths along the Mangere Inlet to be screened with plantings similar to Taumanu Reserve for the 126146 Wallbridge, L & A wetlands and footpaths to remain a tranquil space, to enjoy the wildlife with reduced noise and visual pollution of Landscape Design Mangere Bridge the road Dotterel management guidelines should be followed to protect and manage any nesting birds for the duration of 126336 Auckland Council Ecology - fauna Mangere Inlet the construction activities in the Mangere Inlet. Cycle facilities (including secure parking) should be considered at key locations and provided by the NZTA in 126336 Auckland Council Facilities Mangere Inlet consultation with the Council. The NZTA is to provide foot paths, commuter cycling, and shared paths to better replace the open space values lost by the take of esplanade reserves. Detailed plans to be reviewed and approved by the Council prior to construction. 126336 Auckland Council Paths Mangere Inlet The NZTA to also provide upgrades elsewhere as compensation for open space values lost by the take of esplanade reserves. 126336 Auckland Council Incorporate linkages between walkways and cycle networks. Paths Mangere Inlet All coastal structures are designed to achieve long-term durability and low maintenance requirements. The Council 126336 Auckland Council Paths Mangere Inlet is to review design specification of all structures to be vested in the Council.
Ensure all recreational and commuter cycling/walking paths have connections to or don’t preclude future 126336 Auckland Council Paths Mangere Inlet connections to existing networks or future networks e.g. Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Greenways Plan. Use heavy planting of vegetation to screen traffic noise and visual pollution from the northern shoreline of the 126328 Oliver, W Landscape Design Mangere Inlet Mangere Inlet.
126325 Read, E Consideration must also be given to the increase in vehicle emissions to birds and users of the walkway. Air Quality Mangere Inlet There is a requirement for heavy planting of vegetation to screen traffic noise and visual pollution from the 126325 Read, E Landscape Design Mangere Inlet northern shoreline of the Mangere Inlet.
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location I seek to see the new footpaths along the Maangere Inlet, east of the bridge, suitably screened from the new road 126196 Read, L with embankments and plantings similar to Taumanu Reserve, so that the wetlands and footpaths can remain a Landscape Design Mangere Inlet tranquil space where poople can enjoy the harbour and wildlife, without the noise and visual pollution of the road.
Detailed wording for proposed conditions will be provided in legal submissions and evidence for any hearing but 126364 Te Kawerau a Maki includes without limitation: Research into baseline health of Mangere Inlet (using biodiversity and mauri/cultural Environment Mangere Inlet indicators) and actions to improve same Seek conditions that encourage enhancement of: The issues as well as critical aspects around dredging for the purposes of providing the base material for the contaminant containment bund has yet to be fully explored with 126384 Te Runanga o Ngati Whatua Coastal Processes - dredging Mangere Inlet the applicant. The inclusion of a set of conditions to ensure the management of any adverse effects should be applied
Demonstrate suitability of alignment of an elevated public transport route from the town centre over the inlet and 126336 Auckland Council Public Transport Mangere Town Centre potential connection across to Mangere Town Centre in relation to achieving positive urban design outcomes.
Seeks further information as to concrete steps, enforceable conditions and funding associated with same to 126364 Te Kawerau a Maki produce tangible outcomes including for the Manukau Harbour more generally including the adverse effects with Further information Manukau Harbour the eastern edge (such as KiwiRail), Great South Rd corner and the southern edge.
Te Kawerau a Maki seeks further information as to whether reclamation and dredging can be avoided, reduced 126364 Te Kawerau a Maki Reclamation manukau harbour and mitigated Detailed wording for proposed conditions will be provided in legal submissions and evidence for any hearing but 126364 Te Kawerau a Maki Environment Manukau Harbour includes without limitation: Restoration of Manukau Harbour more holistically The Campaign for Better The proposed EWL arterial road route should not traverse the Manukau Harbour foreshore to the immediate east 126255 Design Manukau Harbour Foreshore Transport Inc of the Onehunga Mall roadway.
A retaining wall should be made such that noise of traffic should be blocked from a street level height of at least 10 metres (because the submitter plans to build a second level at the maximum height allowed). The retaining wall 126173 Bi, E should be made of such that dust/smog of traffic should be blocked from a street level height of at leats 10 Noise and Vibration Mataroa Road metres. Asthetics of the construction should maintain the green nature of the internal street (Mataroa Road) throughout the entire established wall.
Ward seek that the Board of Inquiry cancels NOR-1, at least in so far as it relates to Ward's site/premises, such 126343 Ward Demolition Limited Submitter specific Miami Parade Onehunga that no land falling with Ward's site/premises is designated for the Proposed Works.
126315 Acrow Limited Review whether acquisition of the submitters property is essential, or find a comparable location for tenants Acquisition Monahan Road Would like an addition of an access way under the motorway to enable the use of the pedestrian bridge (image 126654 Woodger, A and Hazera, E Design Motorway SH1 Otahuhu Creek was attached Coppins Road/Otahuhu Creek) 126325 Read, E Widening of SH1 to four lanes should continue north of the Mount Wellington interchange. Design Mount Wellington 126327; 126328; Oliver, B; Oliver, W; The widening of SH1 to four lanes should continue north of the Mt Wellington interchange Alternatives Mount Wellington interchange Kiwi Property Group Ltd and Make provision for traffic to travel between the EWL and South Eastern Highway without having to use the local 126492 Sylvia Park Business Centre Traffic - local roads Mt Wellington and arterial road network in vicinity of Sylvia Park. Ltd
126280 Syl Park Investments Ltd Look at the Mt Wellington interchange to produce a better flow of traffic northbound on Mt Wellington Highway Traffic Mt Wellington
126322 T and G Global Ltd T & G seeks consequential relief that may be necessary to give effect to the concerns set out in the submission. General Mt Wellington
126322 T and G Global Ltd Opposes the notices of requirements and resource consents not be confirmed for works on T & G's site. Opposition Mt Wellington Kiwi Property Group Ltd and 126492 Sylvia Park Business Centre The design for the SH1 interchange with the EWL should be amended to enable all traffic movements Traffic Mt Wellington Ltd Impose conditions requiring NZTA to construct (and maintain) access to the remainder of the Land (Remainder Jaafar Holdings Ltd and Mt Land) as and when that access is required by, the owner of the Remainder Land. All accesses should be of a nature 126205 Access - specific Mt Wellington Highway Wellington Highway Ltd and scale to provide for the activities on the site anticipated by the current Unitary Plan zoning and approved by the owner of the Remainder Land. Impose conditions acknowledging that the Remainder Land will be developed prior to, during, or after the works Jaafar Holdings Ltd and Mt 126205 have been undertaken, and requiring NZTA to provide all necessary written approvals for that development, Acquisition Mt Wellington Highway Wellington Highway Ltd irrespective of when that development occurs.
Jaafar Holdings Ltd and Mt 126205 Prohibit the use of any of the Required Land for any purpose other than for the road network. Acquisition Mt Wellington Highway Wellington Highway Ltd
Jaafar Holdings Ltd and Mt Restrict the Proposal to the portion of the Land (and airspace) necessary to provide for the road network 126205 Submitter specific Mt Wellington Highway Wellington Highway Ltd (Required Land) while preserving the rights to utilise the balance of the Land.
Impose conditions requiring NZTA to compensate the owner of the Remainder Land if the Proposal impacts upon Jaafar Holdings Ltd and Mt 126205 the Remainder Land, or any activities occurring thereon (either directly during construction, or through any Submitter specific Mt Wellington Highway Wellington Highway Ltd ongoing restriction such as a setback requirement following construction of the works).
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location Require NZTA, at NZTA’s sole cost to acquire the Required Land; undertake all necessary subdivision and other Jaafar Holdings Ltd and Mt 126205 processes; relocate any infrastructure currently crossing the Required Land that serves the portion of the Land not Submitter specific Mt Wellington Highway Wellington Highway Ltd being taken; and provide for the offer back of land not required for the purposes of the roading network corridor.
The Campaign for Better That the Board recommends jointly to the NZTA and Auckland Transport that they take urgent action to remove Mt Wellington Highway on/off 126255 Traffic Transport Inc the known vehicle bottleneck at the SH1, Mt Wellington Highway on/off ramps, SH1 Exit 437 and Exit 438. ramp 8 Sylvia Park Road Body 126453 Use the Mt Wellington interchange to produce a better flow of traffic northbound on Mt Wellington Highway Alternatives Mt Wellington interchange Corporate
126277 Auckland Business Forum Ensure the provision of north facing ramps at the interchange connecting with SH1 at Mt Wellington. Design Mt Wellington Interchange
Provide evidence to show how the landscaping for the overbridge and Neilson Street connection 126336 Auckland Council Further information Neilson Street appropriately addresses the visual prominence of the structure and the town centre to harbour visual connections
Ensure the scope of the project includes changes to the street system and intersections around, in particular Neilson Street, to respond to the change in street status and use by providing a higher amenity and safe 126336 Auckland Council Traffic - local roads Neilson Street environment for all users. Describe these changes and how they will be effective in maximising the benefits of traffic flow reduction. Impose conditions to ensure any adverse effects on MetroPort and MetroBox are appropriately avoided, 126344 Port of Tauranga Mitigation Neilson Street remedied or mitigated. Amend the layout at the Neilson Street interchange and the surrounding local road network that ensures the 126340 Sanford Limited continued safe and efficient vehicle access for industry vehicles to the Port, and that such access is not Alternatives Neilson Street undermined by the introduction of an inappropriate level of public access. The NZTA in conjunction with Auckland Transport be directed in the future to provide such structures, be they a The Campaign for Better 126255 new bridge or a trench that will allow the alignment of the envisaged rail to Auckland Airport using the heavy rail Future - rail Neilson Street Transport Inc format to pass under the Neilson Street roadway.
The Council requests that alignments and design modifications that reflect less severance of the wharf from the 126336 Auckland Council town centre are considered and a direct connection, or separate connections for active modes and motorised Alternatives Neilson Street vehicles, are provided to deliver improved connectivity between the Onehunga Wharf and Onehunga Town Centre.
126277 Auckland Business Forum Ensure appropriate noise mitigation of the Neilson St interchange for the nearby community. Noise and Vibration Neilson Street Interchange
To be assured that: The design and construction of the Neilson Street interchange will be capable of safely and efficiently handling large truck and trailer units, and not put other traffic at risk.The traffic management and 126277 Auckland Business Forum design of surrounding roads eliminates heavy trucks and other ‘through’ commercial and commuter traffic having Traffic - heavy loads Neilson Street Interchange to enter Onehunga’s retail area and local streets – Onehunga Mall, Selwyn St and Gloucester Rd. Appropriate sound mitigation is provided for the nearby community.
Mamaku Investment 126191 Extend the current flush median along Captain Springs Road from the Neilson Street intersection Design Neilson Street interchange Management Ltd Change the Neilson St interchange so that the lane that disappears on the left on SH20 heading north is removed 126211 McLeod, J Alternatives Neilson Street interchange in a better way. Examine the opportunity to replace the pines on Ngagango Otainui Island with native coastal tree 126336 Auckland Council Ecology - habitat Ngagango Otainui species such as karaka to provide future roosting and nesting sites for shags and spoonbills Instruct NZTA to redesign the plans for the Onehunga area and consider alternative designs that may be 126178 Aska, S Alternatives Onehunga presented to NZTA Reconsider the interchange so that traffic is not forced through residential Onehunga and the waterfront cut off 126614 Garland, J Alternatives Onehunga from public access I seek to see a clear conservation plan included for the Historic Aotea Sea Scout building so that, if it remains or if it Aotea Sea Scouts - 126196 Read, L is moved, it is brought up to standard as part of the project, as reparation to Aotea Sea Scouts and for future Onehunga conservation generations to enjoy.
I seek to see the parts of the project that impact on the Aotea Sea Scouts amended to ensure the Sea Scouts are properly catered for either – and preferably – with the relocation of the existing building to a location and 126196 Read, L requirements agreed to by the Aotea Sea Scouts (which I understand to be a position over a new foreshore of a Aotea Sea Scouts - relocate Onehunga new reclamation, close to the port of Onehunga, with adequate boat storage and amenity values) or with the provision of a new building and similar stipulations
I seek the Port of Onehunga developed as a public space, and where parts of the proposal impact negatively on 126196 Read, L Design Onehunga this that these be amended. 126196 Read, L I seek to see the plan revised so as to reduce delays in vehicles going through Onehunga streets. Design Onehunga I seek to see the project modified to include a restoration reclamation along the Onehunga foreshore between 126196 Read, L Taumanu Reserve and the Port of Onehunga, so as to provide amenity space for the growing population Landscape Design Onehunga Onehunga. I seek to see the plan revised to include remediation action to ensure the harbour is dredged, in and around the 126196 Read, L Port of Onehunga, and dredged mud used for mudcrete in creating reclamation land, locking up contaminants, and Reclamation Onehunga restoring the harbour.
Scott, E; Grove Hardward 126109; 126240; 126141; Ltd, Grove Enterprises Ltd, Consider the Onehunga Enhancement Society plans Alternatives Onehunga 126087 Stone Store Properties Ltd; Gough, P; Lee, J
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location
Include a reclamation/restoration between the Port of Onehunga and Taumanu Reserve with the Sea Scouts Scouts Association of New relocated to over a new foreshore of this reclamation with adequate amenity and values to support the Sea Scouts 126212 Zealand - Aotea Sea Scout operation, either with a move of the existing building and provision of additional boat storage, or by way of a Aotea Sea Scouts - relocate Onehunga Group purpose built building, built to an agreed design, in exchange for the existing heritage building, and without creating financial burden on the group.
Scouts Association of New Aotea Sea Scouts would like the Environmental Protection Agency to review the Unitary Plan designation of 126212 Zealand - Aotea Sea Scout Outstanding Natural Feature on the marine tuff in addition the reclamation and restoration should be placed on Natural Heritage Onehunga Group hold until a plan change. 126257 Sheen, C Noise control standards which take into account the natural ampitheater. Noise and Vibration Onehunga EWL be re-designed to allow commuter rail to Auckland Airport using a rail alignment between the existing The Campaign for Better 126255 Onehunga Railway Station (or an equivalent relocated station serving the Onehunga retail area) and the Manukau Future - rail Onehunga Transport Inc Harbour that is at the grade of the Onehunga Branch Line, ie. at approximately the current ground level.
Delete all components of the East West Link to the exisitng State Highway and Local roading network within The Local Lockup Ltd (Jointly 126067 Onehunga, between Gloucester Park Road and Alfred St, so as to allow NZTA to redesign this part of the project in Alternatives Onehunga with Scott Palmer) consultation with the community, and then resubmit it.
The Local Lockup Ltd (Jointly The submitter seeks that the consents for the part of the proposal which is has submitted on be declined and this 126067 Opposition Onehunga with Scott Palmer) part of the Notice of Requirement be cancelled.
The Manukau Harbour Require the NZTA to properly consult with the community and stakeholders and properly consider alternatives with 126319 Restoration Society the outcome being the redesign of at least the Onehunga part of the proposal to better avoid remedy or mitigate Consultation Onehunga Incorporated the adverse effects of the proposal on the environment and in particular the coastal environment.
The Onehunga Require the NZTA to properly consult with the community and stakeholders and properly consider alternatives with 126335 Enhancement Society the outcome being the redesign of at least the Onehunga part of the proposal to better avoid remedy or mitigate Alternatives Onehunga Incorporated the adverse effects of the proposal on the environment.
It seeks this outcome so as to require the NZTA to properly consult with the community and stakeholders and The Re-Think East West Link 126318 properly consider alternatives with the outcome being the redesign of at least the Onehunga part of the proposal Consultation Onehunga Society Incorporated to better avoid remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of the proposal on the environment.
The Re-Think East West Link Society Incorporated; The Onehunga Enhancement Seeks that the resource consents for the Onehunga part of the proposal not be granted and that the Notice of 126318; 126335; 126319 Society Incorporated; The Opposition Onehunga requirement for at least this part of the project be cancelled or modified. Manukau Harbour Restoration Society Incorporated
Seeks to use Aotea's preferred solution to have the foreshore reclamation/restoration completed as part of the 126090 Turner, F project, with the existing building moved to over a new foreshore maintaining the same aspect and association Aotea Sea Scouts - relocate Onehunga with the sea as that of the current location.
126234 Wackrow, T & D Design to only have minimal impact on the footprint of Onehunga (including facilities and community) Design Onehunga 126234 Wackrow, T & D Protection of the historical sites such as 19th Century Onehunga Tavern and Aotea Sea Scouts Heritage Onehunga 126146 Wallbridge, L & A Seeks to see the plan be revised to reduce delays for vehicles going through Onehunga Sts. Traffic - local roads Onehunga 126504 TIM Nominees Retain the location of the East West Link as shown in NOR1 Design Onehunga and Penrose I seek to see the project modified to include a restoration reclamation along Onehunga Foreshore between 126146 Wallbridge, L & A Reclamation Onehunga Foreshore Taumaunu Reserve and the Port of Onehunga to provide amenity space for the growing population of Onehunga. Alter the proposed design to appropriately restore the previously lost natural coastal environment along the 126622 Wright, K Landscape Design Onehunga Foreshore Onehunga Foreshore between Taumanu Reserve and Port of Onehunga
Fisher and Paykel Healthcare The land bridge needs to be many times wider than indicated in the planning documents and should facilitate 126311 Paths Onehunga Land Bridge Cycling Community green spaces or a square suitable for recreational walking and cycling activities. Change the design for Onehunga Mall, to provide best practice cycle facilities, separate from both vehicles and 126253 Bike Auckland Alternatives Onehunga Mall pedestrians.
The proposed Onehunga Mall / Onehunga Harbour Road roundabout in Section 1 would be very pedestrian and cycling-unfriendly as shown - with multiple traffic lanes for people to cross, large diameter circulatory lanes, and no pedestrian crossings. Similarly, the retained design of Onehunga Harbour Road (sweeping turn etc) will make it 126253 Bike Auckland Safety Onehunga Mall stay very "speedy". This link and the intersection should be designed as much more people-friendly, considering the important role of Onehunga Mall as the main active mode north-south link, and considering there is a parallel new Galway Street link aimed at heavy traffic just to the east.
The proposed Onehunga Mall / Onehunga Harbour Road route and the roundabout connecting the two roads 126253 Bike Auckland should be more strongly de-emphasised for motor vehicles compared to Galway Street, and traffic-calmed Traffic - local roads Onehunga Mall accordingly.
Fisher and Paykel Healthcare Create dedicated protected cycle lanes on the lower section of Onehunga Mall through Neilson St intersection to 126311 Paths - separated cycle paths Onehunga Mall Cycling Community the proposed roundabout.
126092 VJM Trust The roundabout should be moved further down the road (25 metres) from the driveway of 52-56 Onehunga Mall. Access - specific Onehunga Mall
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location
Aitken, N; Bennet, P; Elrick, S; Faalogo, C; Fitzgerald, T; Hara, A; Haraki, C; Harris, 126478; 126539; 126403; Ike; Harris, Ivan; Harris, 126371; 126363; 126373; Laina; Harris, Leigh; Hodge, 126365; 126393; 126401; S; Hooton, C; Hooton, K; 126389; 126395; 126388; Inoue, W; Jeyakumar, G; 126497; 126474; 126372; Khup, M; Kiln, P; Mathews, The residents of Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac need their rights upheld as 'highly sensitive recievers' and their 126476; 126408; 126374; S; Miller, P; Novelle, D; dwellings as 'PPF's' by incorporating them into the design plan, scheduling, and mitigation of adverse effects (e.g. Submitter specific Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac 126391; 126397; 126480; Orme, S; Paewai, M; 4m high transparent acrylic acoustic noise barriers, graffiti proof noise barriers). 126544; 126400; 126366; Pekepo, M; Peperkoorn, M; 126171; 126462; 126458; Philcox, A; Onehunga Mall 126369; 126370; 126398; Cul-de-sac Residents; Yun, P; 126402; 126396; 126885; Wei, S; Waever, S; 126542 Shanmuganathan, N & Thangaral, R; Sethi, R; Schekotova, A; Rich, K;
Mathews, S; Mathews, S; Vehicle access to homes in the cul-de-sac must be maintained at all times and construction vehicles may not use 126391; 126390; 126458; Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac Construction - access Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac the cul-de-sac. Residents; Mathews, S; Mathews, S; 126391; 126390; 126458; Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac All engagement to residents of the cul-de-sac is to be by both mail box and email. Submitter specific Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac Residents; Mathews, S; Mathews, S; All dwellings in the submitters cul-de-sac are to be inspected and photographed prior and post construction and at 126391; 126390; 126458; Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac Submitter specific Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac yearly intervals so that any vibration caused by NZTA can be identified and repaired by NZTA Residents; Mathews, S; Mathews, S; Full modelling needs to be done to confirm the submitter, and surrounding homes, do not experience vibration 126391; 126390; 126458; Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac Submitter specific Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac post construction. Residents; Mathews, S; Mathews, S; NZTA should individually mitigate all dwellings in the submitters cul-de-sac to ensure that air quality does not 126391; 126390; 126458; Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac Submitter specific Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac exceed standards for healthy living. Residents; Mathews, S; Mathews, S; 126391; 126390; 126458; Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac Prevent any widening of SH20 at the end of the cul-de-sac Submitter specific Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac Residents; Mathews, S; Mathews, S; 126391; 126390; 126458; Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac A large green bridge across to the port for public amenity and enjoyment of green space Submitter specific Onehunga Mall cul-de-sac Residents; 126119 Super Foods Ltd To not include the roundabout/intersection on Onehunga Mall Road/Onehunga Harbour Road Alternatives Onehunga Mall Road
Proposed condition DC.11 should include the full range of issues identified including: design treatments for Onehunga Mall and Galway Street; Walking and cycling facilities on the EWL mainline, including potential for further separation and/or buffering; confirmation that weaving movements at the interface of Sylvia Park Road Onehunga Mall 126354 Auckland Transport Design and the EWL can be safely managed; detail on how multi-modal access to the Sylvia Park metropolitan centre is to Sylvia Park be established; detail on how the proposal will interface with the rail network including any required mitigation measures at level crossings; and any additional local road upgrades that may be identified as required.
TOES; Darling, W; Martinus, Various; 126407; 126625; I call on the Board of Inquiry to instruct NZTA to create a pedestrian mall from Onehunga Mall to the Port of S; Mimmack, J; Mitchell, C; Facilities Onehunga Mall; Harbour 126825; 126538; 126560 Onehunga which is accessible to vehicles of the residents of selected streets only. Owens, A; If approved, full compensation should be offered to [own address] residents because of the long-term detrimental 126132 Carroll, J Submitter specific Onehunga Road effects on the property. Ensure the removal of conflicts between commercial traffic and pedestrian and retail traffic 126277 Auckland Business Forum Health and Safety Onehunga Township in the village of Onehunga and nearby residential streets. 126167 Burt, O Widen off-ramp from SW Motorway into Onehunga Township Alternatives Onehunga Township 126167 Burt, O Pollution - Onehunga Township and Environs Environment - pollution Onehunga Township Provide for vehicle access into Onehunga Wharf, in a configuration and location that will provide for future Onehunga Wharf & 126336 Auckland Council Access development of this area. connections Extend Orpheus Drive east of the land bridge as far as the connection to the ‘New Old Mangere Onehunga Wharf & 126336 Auckland Council Design Bridge’, with this potentially being a shared surface. connections Extend the proposed land bridge to the east to include the alignment of the ‘New Old Mangere Bridge’ Onehunga Wharf & 126336 Auckland Council Design connections. connections Describe landscape/streetscape treatment around the edge of the link by Onehunga Harbour Road and Onehunga Onehunga Wharf & 126336 Auckland Council Further information Wharf, and on the land bridge. connections Describe design intentions around Onehunga Harbour Road, including under the SH20 Bridge, Onehunga Wharf & 126336 Auckland Council Further information showing intended streetscape and means of mitigation of noise and increased traffic flows. connections Describe potential scope of landscape/streetscape treatment on the land bridge and means of vehicle access down Onehunga Wharf & 126336 Auckland Council to Onehunga Wharf, integrating this with a landscape treatment for the wider tuff ring and Onehunga Harbour Further information connections Road.
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location Proper environmental and social impact assessment for the Aotea Sea Scouts building transitional plan for the 126057 Stirrup, T Aotea Sea Scouts to ensure continuity during works, further development plan for the Sea Scout building and Aotea Sea Scouts - information Orpheus Drive grounds to ensure future generations of kids have the opportunity to use and enjoy the building
Consultation is necessary with local residents to ensure vehicle and pedestrian access to Otahuhu East during the Consultation - local 126325 Read, E Otahuhu upgrade of the Princes Street interchange. community NZTA to ensure that the design is future-proofed to provide for connections to the esplanade reserves on both 126336 Auckland Council Future Otahuhu Creek banks of Ōtāhuhu Creek under the SH1 Bridge. 126336 Auckland Council The Council be consulted with respect to remediation and planting plans. Management Plans Otahuhu Creek Require the design for the new new Otahuhu Creek overbridge to incorporate the future west-east Greenways Otahuhu Creek overbridge 126253 Bike Auckland links under SH1, to mitigate local traffic and construction impacts, and to take up the unique opportunity afforded Paths (Sector 5) by the new construction. 8 Sylvia Park Road Body 126453 NZTA should not purchase the land for the Pacific Rise Filter Submitter specific Pacific Rise Corporate Pacific Business Centres 126262 Further planning is required to alleviate the safety risks and ease the exit/entry traffic movements Access - specific Pacific Rise Owners Association
Fisher and Paykel Healthcare 126311 Construct separate protected cycle lanes on the new Panama Rd bridge. Paths - separated cycle paths Panama Road Bridge Cycling Community Require the design for the new Panama Road bridge over SH1 to provide best practice cycle facilities (i.e. separate 126253 Bike Auckland from both pedestrians and motor vehicles), to avoid permanently limiting key local cycle connectivity - despite a Paths Panama Road Bridge (Sector 5) brand new bridge being built. The Council seeks that new discharge consents are obtained to cover the waste beneath the EWL embankment 126336 Auckland Council Closed Landfills Pikes Point and that these be owned by the applicant.
The Council seeks that any new discharge consents relating to the remainder of the closed landfill for which the new leachate collection system will be developed, should contain monitoring of controls as a more effective 126336 Auckland Council Closed Landfills Pikes Point measure given the significant amount of historical monitoring data and the difficulty in locating monitoring points outside the Council waste mass yet not within, or downstream of, the waste within EWL designation.
Council notes that there are a number of potential impacts on Council assets that may not be evident in the short 126336 Auckland Council to medium term (e.g. potential ground water level elevations, risk of seepage etc...) and that Council’s position Closed Landfills Pikes Point should be protected by the requirement for a bond as part of the EWL consents.
NZTA is to be responsible for all consent monitoring (visual inspection of the embankment is required every 3 126336 Auckland Council Closed Landfills Pikes Point months), noncompliance investigation and rectification during construction. Access to the embankment during construction is a significant health and safety risk. NZTA, with Closed Landfills 126336 Auckland Council and Contaminated Land Response (CLCLR) agreement, is to be responsible for undertaking these inspections during Closed Landfills Pikes Point construction to mitigate the potential health and safety risk. The NZTA is to provide for access for the Council, or it’s Agent, to monitoring/ inspection points in the detailed 126336 Auckland Council design (i.e. post construction). CLCLR to approve location and design of, including access to, replacement Closed Landfills Pikes Point monitoring points. The NZTA will need to provide access for the Council, or it’s Agent, to undertake inspections of the new bund 126336 Auckland Council Closed Landfills Pikes Point constructed on the seaward side of the landfill. EWL detailed design to mitigate impact of the embankment on upstream groundwater levels and potential 126336 Auckland Council increase in risk of slope instability, preferential flow paths developing along existing stormwater infrastructure, Closed Landfills Pikes Point groundwater contamination and/or leachate seepage.
The detail design of the project does not increase the risk of future seeps from Galway St and provide access for 126336 Auckland Council Closed Landfills Pikes Point the Council, or its Agent, to undertake investigations and remediation works should any seeps occur. Conditions provide for progressive decommissioning and replacement of monitoring points including, as far as is 126336 Auckland Council practicable, continuity in monitoring data. CLCLR is to approve location and design of, including access to, Closed Landfills Pikes Point replacement monitoring points.
EWL detailed design is to allow for leachate treatment within the stormwater wetlands and contingency measures for pumping to trade waste. The Council notes that the proposed design has not as yet adequately demonstrated that the wetlands can effectively and efficiently treat leachate and that the need for pre-treatment has not been 126336 Auckland Council Closed Landfills Pikes Point ruled out. In addition, costs of the wetlands and the potential reduction in costs associated with reduction in saline intrusion have not as yet been quantified. Appropriate conditions are required to ensure these issues are addressed during the detailed design process.
The replacement leachate management system will need to incorporate redundancy and flexibility if CLCLR need to 126336 Auckland Council Closed Landfills Pikes Point change anything to address issues in the future. The wetland treatment systems are designed to accommodate leachate and any foreseeable 126336 Auckland Council Closed Landfills Pikes Point fluctuations in quality and quantity (based on current data including trends). The conditions require preparation of a leachate management plan covering the establishment of the wetlands 126336 Auckland Council with progressive leachate introduction, monitoring, setting of trigger levels for diversion and maintenance Closed Landfills Pikes Point requirements. The imposition of conditions clarifying the extent of restrictions under section 176 of the RMA on POAL and its 126346 Ports of Auckland Ltd Further information Pikes Point Pikes Point lessees. Auckland Council - A Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) approach must be adopted for the underpass to 126336 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Health and Safety Port connect the port area. Board
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location I call on the Board of Inquiry to instruct NZTA to sell the Port of Onehunga to Punuku now, so work can start on 126242 Fyfe Group Ltd the upgrade of the Port and for the recreational and commercial use of the Onehunga/Mangere Bridge Acquistion Port communities and greater Auckland A decision declining to confirm the notice of requirement and associated regional resource consents, to the extent 126346 Ports of Auckland Ltd Construction - operation Port Link Road that they authorise the construction and operation of proposed Port Link Road.
Conditions should be provided requiring full access (left turn in / left turn out and right turn in / right turn out) for 126346 Ports of Auckland Ltd Access - specific Port of Onehunga all classes of vehicles to the Port of Onehunga, following completion of the Project's construction.
Design changes and / or amendments to the proposed conditions to ensure that the adverse effects of the construction and operation of the Project on POAL's land are avoided, remedied or mitigated, including (but not 126346 Ports of Auckland Ltd Management Plans Port of Onehunga limited to): Amendments to the proposed management plan conditions to ensure a robust development process requiring consultation and engagement with affected stakeholders.
In terms of the paragraph 44(d) above, POAL is not currently able to be more specific about the particular relief required to address its concerns regarding the adverse effects of the Project on its landholdings. This is because of 126346 Ports of Auckland Ltd the lack of information in the application materials concerning the particular works proposed for POAL's land. Submitter specific Port of Onehunga POAL is happy to provide further specificity as to the relief it seeks to address the Project's adverse effects on POAL, once that further information is made available by the Transport Agency.
The protection of the Aotea Sea Scouts through the provision of a new building or relocation of the existing 126146 Wallbridge, L & A building to a location agreed by the Aotea Sea Scouts including a conservation plan for the restoration of the Aotea Sea Scouts - relocate Port of Onehunga building as reparation and for future generations to enjoy. Seeks the remediation works to include dredging in and around the Port of Onehunga and the dredged mud used 126146 Wallbridge, L & A Coastal Processes- dredging Port of Onehunga for mudcrete to create reclamation land. Seeks to see the Port of Onehunga developed as a public space and where there are negative impacts they be 126146 Wallbridge, L & A Mitigation Port of Onehunga mitigated.
Design changes and/or amendments to the proposed conditions to ensure that the adverse effects of the 126346 Ports of Auckland Ltd Construction - operation Ports of Onehunga construction and operation of the Project on POAL's land are avoided, remedied or mitigated
The conditions proposed by the Transport Agency for the notices of requirement and associated resource consents require the future development of a range of management plans. These management plans will set out the methods to avoid, remedy or mitigate the Project's effects once detailed design has been undertaken. POAL is not opposed to the management plan approach per se, which is commonly considered appropriate for larger linear infrastructure projects. However, POAL is concerned that the management plan conditions currently proposed by 126346 Ports of Auckland Ltd the Transport Agency are insufficient to adequately avoid, remedy or mitigate the Project's adverse effects on Management Plans Ports of Onehunga POAL's landholdings.In particular, as currently proposed there is no provision for POAL to participate in the development of the management plans that are relevant to the management of effects on its land. POAL therefore has no ability beyond the Board of Inquiry process to ensure that the adverse effects of the Project on its landholdings are appropriately managed. This is a particularly important concern for POAL, given the land use history of its Pikes Point site and the unique requirements of its ongoing use and development, as discussed above.
126325 Read, E The Princes Street overbridge must remain open and safe for pedestrian use during the upgrade. Health and Safety Princes St Consult with local residents to ensure vehicle and pedestrian access to Otahuhu East during the upgrade of the Consultation - local 126327; 126328; Oliver, B; Oliver, W; Princes St Interchange Princes Street interchange. community
Auckland Council - Māngere- Safe access and exit should be provided for the local shops on the corner of Albert Street and Princes Street and for 126336 Access - specific Princes Street Ōtāhuhu Local Board the Ōtāhuhu Gurudwara worship facility on 118 Princes Street (opposite the shops).
Fisher and Paykel Healthcare Construct separate protected cycle lanes on the new Princes St bridge and Frank Grey Pl, and include cycle lanes 126311 Paths - separated cycle paths Princes Street Cycling Community and storage boxes through the intersections at each end of the bridge.
Require the design for the new Princes Street interchange (as well as the parts of Frank Grey Place sections that Princes Street Interchange 126253 Bike Auckland are effectively forming part of the interchange) to provide safer and more attractive walking and cycling facilities Paths (Sector 5) that better acknowledge the particular issues of walking and cycling in a busy interchange environment.
Auckland Council - Māngere- The use of traffic lights or alternative routes could be considered through Frank Grey Place (south end) or an over 126336 Alternatives Princes Street, Otahuhu Ōtāhuhu Local Board bridge over the motorway linking Avenue Road.
The Local Board requests additional safety features to be considered and implemented, for pedestrians and cyclists Auckland Council - Māngere- 126336 between the portion of Princes Street between, Frank Grey Place and Albert Street. The new layout needs to be Paths Princes Street, Otahuhu Ōtāhuhu Local Board friendly for pedestrians and cyclists to confidently and safely use this stretch of road.
Envirowaste Services Ltd, Chemwaste; Envirowaste Cancel NoR1 in so far as it relates to the Premises such that no land falling within the Premises is designated for 126630; 126382 Services Ltd, Ward Submitter specific Private the Project Demolition Ltd, Green Vision Recycling
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location
Envirowaste Services Ltd, Chemwaste; Envirowaste Not grant, refuse, or amend (including by way of any necessary changes to conditions) the resource consents 126630; 126382 Services Ltd, Ward sought for the Landfill Leachate Interception System such that no part of that system occupies or affects any part Submitter specific Private Demolition Ltd, Green Vision of the Premises Recycling
126270 Monahan Properties Ltd Require NZTA to undertake partial or total purchase of the submitters land is a request is made Submitter specific Private To ensure safe and convenient walking and cycling, even in the busiest path areas, change the design of the proposed west-east shared path to provide best-practice cycling paths (i.e. separate from cars but also from 126253 Bike Auckland Paths - separated cycle paths Sector 1 pedestrians). The change should cover Sector 1, from Orpheus Drive in the west to the already proposed-as- separate Section 2 paths in the east. To clearly demarcating the neighbouring pedestrian and cycle zones, a kerbed separation between footpath and 126253 Bike Auckland cycle path zones should be included in Section 1 and 2, ideally in a chamfered (“forgiving”) format as per the Dutch Paths - separated cycle paths Sector 1, 2 example in Image 09 of the Bike Auckland submission. The barriers separating the Sector 2 "Commuter Cycleway" and the landscape strips Sector 3 shared path from the 126253 Bike Auckland Paths Sector 2, 3 road carriageway, should not be removed
Provide much better and safer north-south cycle access to centre sections of the new west east paths - to ensure the paths provide a practical active transport component for the areas around them, rather than just an isolated 126253 Bike Auckland Paths Sector 2, 3, 4 long-distance link. These added works could occur via a mitigation works funding condition in favour of Auckland Transport works, similar to the arrangement in the Waterview Shared Path EPA process.
The current design of the Great South Road / East West Link intersection creates a significant issue for the future 126253 Bike Auckland Auckland Cycle Network facilities - by not providing space for southbound cycle facilities in the south-eastern Future Sector 3 quadrant. This needs to be avoided by providing these now, or confirming practical future-proofing space.
Fisher and Paykel Healthcare 126311 Create dedicated protected cycle lanes running the length of the project to Sylvia Park. Paths - separated cycle paths Sectors 3 and 4 Cycling Community The design for SH1 Interchange with the East West Link is amended to enable all traffic movements (ie, including 126484 Tram Lease Limited Design SH1 Interchange with EWL connections from the East West Link to and from the North.
Where permanent access to the Southdown Thermal Power Plant site may be affected by the Proposal, the Requiring Authority shall consult with Mercury, Transpower, KiwiRail and First Gas during the preparation of the 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Outline Plan(s). The Requiring Authority shall demonstrate how adequate and acceptable access for these parties Access - specific Southdown will be maintained and shall include a summary of those comments from those parties arising from consultation and the responses in the Outline Plan(s).
In managing dust effects from the Construction Works (including operation of the concrete batching plant) associated with the East West Link Project; (a) Construction Works shall be managed to; (i) Avoid adverse air quality effects from dust on existing electricity infrastructure, specifically transformers, switchgear, and other high voltage equipment (including high voltage insulators); and (ii) Minimise adverse air quality effects from dust on Mercury’s solar research and development centre; (b) The Requiring Authority shall consult with Mercury regularly about adverse air quality effects from its activities.The Consent Holder shall prepare a dust deposition monitoring procedure for inclusion in the CEMP in accordance with the Ministry for the Environment “Good practice for assessing and managing the environmental effects of dust emissions”. The monitoring results will be used to determine the effectiveness of the dust management activities. In particular, monitoring shall determine whether effects on electricity infrastructure at the Southdown Thermal Power Plant are being appropriately avoided and / 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Air Quality Southdown mitigated. If the appropriate effectiveness cannot be achieved, management protocols (which may include, but not be limited to dust suppression, vehicle speed limits, aggregate quality, and water spraying) shall be applied. (d) The Requiring Authority shall compensate for fair and reasonable costs for regular cleaning of solar panels at Mercury’s Solar research and development centre, required as a result of dust effects from construction activities associated with the East-West Link Project. For the avoidance of doubt, regular cleaning means at least once every two weeks during construction. (e) The Requiring Authority shall report to Auckland Council from the beginning of construction and every two months during construction of the work NZTA has undertaken to comply with (a) and (b), including payment for fortnightly cleaning of solar panels; and feedback from Mercury obtained through the consultation programme regarding ensuring the dust from construction activities is not having an adverse effect on solar performance at Mercury’s Solar research and development centre, located at Southdown.
126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Mercury seeks that appropriate measures are initiated to mitigate the potential effects of airborne asbestos. Air Quality Southdown
Mercury seeks that conditions include specific provision for on-going monitoring of NOx levels. Any monitoring 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd program must be undertaken at an appropriate time of year (season) and be continuous monitoring for a period of Air Quality Southdown no less than six months pre and post construction of the highway.
That the Requiring Authority set up an air quality monitoring station to continuously monitor ambient air 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd contaminant levels for NOx, for two six month periods from February through to July (inclusive), one six month Air Quality Southdown period to be pre construction and the other six month period to be post construction.
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location
Prior to the lodgement of the Outline Plan/s, the Requiring Authority shall prepare and implement, in consultation with Mercury, First Gas, KiwiRail and Transpower an Electrical Hazardous Management Plan (EHMP). The purpose of the EHMP is to ensure the design and construction of the Project takes account of, and includes, measures to 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Construction Southdown mitigate potential adverse health and safety effects that may arise from reconfiguring existing infrastructure, including the existing earthgrid located at Southdown Thermal Power Station. Refer to submission for EHMP contents.
As part of the Outline Plan(s) prepared under Section 176A of the RMA, the Requiring Authority shall include an assessment of the risks associated with the construction and operation of the stage of the Project relevant to all electricity infrastructure activities authorised at Southdown for which the Outline Plan has been submitted. The risk assessment should be undertaken in compliance with AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 Risk management and include 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd consideration of steps taken to avoid, remedy or mitigate risk to an acceptable level on: (a) people located at Construction Southdown Southdown, including Mercury staff, road constructors and maintainers associated with Construction Works; (b) members of the public that use the roadway associated with the following operation hazards: (i) the heat plume; (ii) the gas plume; (iii) the steam plume; (iv) gas turbine disc failure; (v) noise; and (vi) fire associated with electricity infrastructure activities.
Mercury shall be consulted with respect to any amendments to the designation over or within the vicinity of the 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Consultation - specific Southdown Southdown Thermal Power Station. Mercury seeks that the Proposal be redesigned to avoid the presence of people directly over thermal power plant 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Design Southdown at Southdown. Mercury seeks that existing activities are not disrupted from vibration effects generated through the construction 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Noise and Vibration Southdown phases of the Proposal. Prior to Construction Works taking place NZTA shall assess buildings, structures and critical infrastructure on the 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Southdown Thermal Power Station site to evaluate potential vibration effects on the site and undertake all Noise and Vibration Southdown necessary work to eliminate the vibration risk.
As part of the Outline Plan(s) prepared under section 176A of the RMA, the Requiring Authority shall demonstrate how the following outcomes at the Southdown Thermal Power Station will be achieved at the relevant stage of the Project for which the Outline Plan has been submitted: (a) Protection of Transpower, First Gas and KiwiRail assets 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Utilities Southdown during Construction Works and following Completion of Construction; and (b) That clearances between the National Grid conductor lines and ground level at the Southdown Thermal Power Station site will achieve compliance with NZECP34:2001.
The natural gas-fired combined cycle gas turbine cogeneration power station located at Hugo-Johnston Drive, 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Utilities Southdown Southdown (Lot 1 DP 178102, Lot 2 DP 178192) Mercury seeks that existing clearances between the National Grid conductor lines and ground level at Southdown 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Utilities Southdown are not reduced. The clearances achieve compliance with NZECP34:2001
As part of the Outline Plan(s) prepared under Section 176A of the RMA, the Requiring Authority shall include the following information for the relevant stage of the Project for which the Outline Plan has been submitted: (a) 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Utilities Southdown Details on how clearances between the National Grid conductor lines and ground level at the Southdown Thermal Power Station will be maintained, including compliance with NZECP34:2001.
That Mercury’s existing solar research and development activities at Southdown are not disrupted and risk of 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd damage to its electricity infrastructure and equipment is adequately mitigated through the construction phases of Utilities - operation Southdown the Proposal.
As part of the Outline Plan(s) prepared under section 176A of the RMA, the Requiring Authority shall demonstrate how the following outcomes at the Southdown Thermal Power Station will be achieved at the relevant stage of the Project for which the Outline Plan has been submitted: (a) GE105 remains located within the Southdown Thermal Power Station and able to operate; (b) A minimum separation distance of 7 metres (in addition to any health and safety measures required) between GE105 and any new structure associated with the East West Link is maintained; (c) Permanent health and safety measures (including blast walls if necessary) are installed to minimise risks to the safety and health of people using the East West Link from Southdown Thermal Power Station; (d) Any 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd relocation of assets within the Southdown site will not compromise the integrity and operation of these assets and Utilities - operation Southdown associated activities; (e) Any infrastructure or asset connections within or to the site will not be disturbed by the Proposal, which shall be demonstrated through solutions agreed with Mercury; (f) Any removal of essential cooling infrastructure will be reinstated or compensated; (g) The earthgrid will be protected, or if not practicable, any replacement shall be operational before the existing earthgrid is removed or modified in any way; (h) Operational agreements are in place with Mercury that demonstrate that the East West Link will operate in a manner that does not constrain the generation assets at the Southdown site and include matters as raised by Mercury, including but in no way limiting those matters to noise, dust, vibration and access.
To mitigate potential adverse health and safety effects that may arise from the reconfiguration of the earthgrid, 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Utilities - safety Southdown Mercury seeks that the earthgrid be operational at all times. No physical construction works shall be undertaken that would compromise the ongoing operation of the Transpower New Zealand Transpower transformer and other assets located within the Southdown Substation serving the Auckland rail 126378 Utilities - operation Southdown Limited network, until such time that a replacement transformer and/or any related infrastructure to undertake this purpose has been commissioned. The NZTA is to consult with the Council on the remediation of Southdown Reserve affected by the NZTA’s proposed 126336 Auckland Council Consultation Southdown Reserve work on adjacent land or remove this from the works area.
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location The Council is consulted on the design of the adjacent land to ensure that a positive interface with Southdown 126336 Auckland Council Consultation Southdown Reserve Reserve is designed, which incorporates CPTED principles.
126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Modify the proposal to follow any of the routes that miss Southdown completely (Options 1, 2,11,15,16). Alternatives Southdown Reserve The realigned to ensure a minimum separation distance of 7 metres is achieved between GE105 and any new 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd structure associated with the Proposal, and that health and safety measures be put in place to avoid, remedy or Alternatives Southdown Reserve mitigate adverse effects on human safety andhealth. Conditions in the designation and any resource consents granted for the Proposal to avoid, remedy and mitigate 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Mitigation Southdown Reserve adverse effects on Southdown;
The NZTA is to upgrade the rail bridge and connections. These works may be accepted as partial mitigation for the 126336 Auckland Council Mitigation Southern Coastal Link adverse effects of permanent loss of esplanade reserve land and walkways to be taken.
The Council seeks that the configuration of the cycle and pedestrian paths in the vicinity of Anns Creek mouth and 126336 Auckland Council the railway bridge facilitates future connections to the south linking with any future cycleway along the coastal Paths Southern Coastal Link side of the rail corridor and Favona on the southern coast of Mangere inlet.
The Māngere-Ōtāhuhu Local Board supports the completion of the Norana walkway through Favona, and around the Mangere Inlet that includes going through, Ōtāhuhu, Onehunga and looping back through Mangere Bridge. 126336 Auckland Council Paths Southern Coastal Link The Board desires the walkway to be included in this project as it is an important catalyst to complete the entire walkway around the Mangere Inlet. 126336 Auckland Council The pedestrian connection to Hugo Johnston Drive is retained and enhanced. Paths Southern Coastal Link Mamaku Investment 126191 Upgrade the EWL connection with the Southern Motorway going north to the same standard as going south Design Southern Motorway Management Ltd
Modify the notice of requirement to include all of the Site within the designation boundary, recognising that the 126326 Stratex Group Limited business disruption caused by the EWL results in the Stratex business to be unviable during both Alternatives - specific Stratex site the construction phase and long term following the commissioning of the EWL
Kiwi Property Group Ltd and The EWL should not compromise a direct vehicular link between Sylvia Park and the Sylvia Park Road / Mt 126492 Sylvia Park Business Centre Access Sylvia Park Wellington Highway intersection. Ltd Kiwi Property Group Ltd and 126492 Sylvia Park Business Centre A revised design should optimise accessibility of Sylvia Park from the motorway and arterial road network. Alternatives Sylvia Park Ltd That the notice of requirement be withdrawn in part and/or modified to avoid any land take from the submitters Sylvia Park Highway and Great 126368 Z Energy Limited site or any adverse effects in the Site and that further and/or consequential relief to address the matters raised in Acquisition South Road this submission. Impose conditions on the notice of requirement and resource consents to address the matters raised in this Sylvia Park Highway and Great 126368 Z Energy Limited Submitter specific submission South Road Modify the notice of requirement to ensure that the submitters site enjoys the same level of vehicle access and 126326 Stratex Group Limited Access - specific Sylvia Park Road egress as currently provided 126326 Stratex Group Limited Modify the notice of requirement to remove the cycleway and pedestrian path adjacent to the Site Alternatives Sylvia Park Road 126326 Stratex Group Limited Modify the notice of requirement to: avoid any land take of the Site Submitter specific Sylvia Park Road Modify the notice of requirement to: ensure that there is no disruption to Stratex business operations during the 126326 Stratex Group Limited Submitter specific Sylvia Park Road construction period NZTA to not purchase the land for the Pacific Rise Filter. Look at moving it to a location with less impact or 126280 Syl Park Investments Ltd Acquisition Sylvia Park Road negotiate on easement rather than purchase. The best solution for Aukland is Option 2 Grade Separated Continuous Structure or a westbound lane for access to 126280 Syl Park Investments Ltd Alternatives Sylvia Park Road 8 Sylvia Park Rd 126280 Syl Park Investments Ltd Go with option 2 to reduce vibration impact Noise and Vibration Sylvia Park Road Retain the current extent and quality of access to the road network enjoyed by those properties, including no 126484 Tram Lease Limited Access - specific Sylvia Park road limitation on movements between those sites and the local road network. 126484 Tram Lease Limited Minimise the extent of land required at 1-7 and 19-21 Sylvia Park Road Acquisition Sylvia Park Road Regarding a design amendment for SH1 Interchange with the EWL, the submitter seeks amendments to incorporate specific conditions to address consultation with and notification of affected land owners and 126484 Tram Lease Limited Consultation - specific Sylvia Park road occupiers to ensure that construction effects are appropriately avoided, remedied or mitigated during construction period. The MacPherson Family Sylvia Park Road / Great South 126067 Ensure that access will be gained for 20 Sylvia Park Road from Sylvia Park Road or Great South Road Access - specific Trust Road The Council seeks the proposed boardwalk adjacent to Taumanu Reserve be replaced by a shared path inside the 126336 Auckland Council Paths Taumanu Reserve existing coastal edge. The Council seeks the area to be provided with a shared path which is also wide enough to incorporate an 126336 Auckland Council appropriate landscape treatment including planting along the landward side of the shared path adjacent to Paths - landscape Taumanu Reserve Taumanu Reserve. Provide mitigation within the coastal marine area of the Te Hopua Tuff Ring Outstanding Natural Feature, 126336 Auckland Council Mitigation Te Hopua Tuff Ring including the restoration of the feature and adjacent area.
Underground or remove the Transpower transmission lines as means to mitigate visual dominance of the tuff ring 126336 Auckland Council Utilities - undergrounding Te Hopua Tuff Ring and the Sea Scouts building and to optimise the environment around the Landing and Onehunga Wharf. That the Board recommends to Auckland Transport that better public transport coverage be provided in the Te The Campaign for Better Te 126255 Papapa/Penrose/Southdown areas taking into account particularly the needs of workers in the businesses located Public Transport Transport Inc Papapa/Penrose/Southdown there.
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location Access and turning requirements of the milk tanker trucks located in the southern part of the main building should 126357 Fonterra Brands - Tip Top NZ Submitter specific Tip Top site be maintained during and after construction. Pedestrian access to the main building will be accomodated. Ensure temporary loss of carparking will not have a significant impact to existing consent requirements for the 126357 Fonterra Brands - Tip Top NZ Submitter specific Tip Top site site.
126357 Fonterra Brands - Tip Top NZ Ensure security arrangements for the Tip Top site are not compromised during construction Submitter specific Tip Top site
126357 Fonterra Brands - Tip Top NZ Protect visual aspects of the Tip Top Building from the roading network, including SH1 Submitter specific Tip Top site
126357 Fonterra Brands - Tip Top NZ Minimise the effects of vibration on 113 Carbine Road, Mt Wellington Submitter specific Tip Top site
126357 Fonterra Brands - Tip Top NZ Minimise the effects of dust on 113 Carbine Road, Mt Wellington Submitter specific Tip Top site If it is deemed through further engagement that there is a significant impact to the operation of the Tip Top site, 126357 Fonterra Brands - Tip Top NZ then Fonterra Brand (Tip Top) Ltd, do not support the acquisition of land as shown the NoR documentation and Submitter specific Tip Top site plans provided from the EWL Alliance The semi mature pohutukawa that require removal should be relocated within the surrounding area and the 126336 Auckland Council Arboriculture Waikaraka Cemetery number of trees removed kept to a minimum.
Redesign the pedestrian bridge to achieve less occupation of the Alfred St road frontage of the cemetery and provide more opportunity for appropriate development and treatment of this area as an access node for the 126336 Auckland Council coastal walkway and cemetery, including replacement parking and picnic areas. This is to be undertaken in Design Waikaraka Cemetery consultation with the Council during the design phase and linking to the Waikaraka Park Masterplan. Incorporation of the pedestrian bridge ramp area with the bund should be considered.
Parking and/or road function upgrades with the cemetery are sought to mitigate the loss of informal car parking 126336 Auckland Council Facilities - parking Waikaraka Cemetery within the cemetery which will result from the proposed land take and modifications along the southern edge. Extend and intensify the landscape treatment along the full width of the Waikaraka Park interface as a 126336 Auckland Council Landscape Design Waikaraka Cemetery coordinated, whole of area plan, including provision at Waikaraka Park South. The Council requests that integrated visual and noise mitigation be implemented along the length of the boundary 126336 Auckland Council Noise and Vibration Waikaraka Cemetery with the cemetery in consultation with the Council. Provide evidence for how the design will attenuate noise in this area and appropriately define this space. One option may be to provide a raised bund (which might rise to approximately 4m) along the southern extent of the 126336 Auckland Council Noise and Vibration Waikaraka Cemetery Waikaraka Park/Cemetery for acoustic and spatial definition purposes, provide access to the top of this for views over the Mangere Inlet as well as Waikaraka Park. Enhance connectivity (both visual and physical) between Waikaraka Park/ Cemetery and the inlet for pedestrians and cyclists. One option may be to relocate the planned Alfred Street pedestrian and cycle overbridge to a strategic position at the centre of the Waikaraka Park edge where it, in combination with the at grade crossings provides 126336 Auckland Council Paths Waikaraka Cemetery optimal connection between the park and the inlet, and for elevated public views over both the inlet and Waikaraka Park. Provide a safe route to a centrally located bridge through the cemetery and park for use by commuter cyclists after dark. Upon abandonment of the Waikaraka Park construction area NZTA is to construct 2 artificial sports fields including lighting and supporting facilities at Waikaraka Park. Alternatively, if the land take is reduced adequately then 126336 Auckland Council Facilities - sports Waikaraka Park three sports fields, “natural” sand and drainage profiles to be built using an approved subcontractor, including associated lighting and irrigation.
During construction of the EWL, NZTA is to provide two consented sand carpet fields within the general area. The 126336 Auckland Council Facilities - sports Waikaraka Park location(s) to be determined, but Gloucester Park North is the preferred option at this time.
126336 Auckland Council NZTA is to rehabilitate the construction yard occupied land to ensure land is suitable for recreational contact sport. Facilities - sports Waikaraka Park
The First Gas Westfield-Hillsborough Pipe should remain in its current location with bridge piles spaced sufficiently 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Access Westfield-Hillsborough to allow access to the pipeline in accordance with the notations on application drawing AEE-U-107. 126358 Ngati Maru Runanga Wetland remediation by planting and native trees Ecology Wetland 8 Sylvia Park Road Body 126453 Option 2 is the better solution to reduce vibration impact and provide access Alternatives Whole Proposal Corporate 8 Sylvia Park Road Body 126453 Allow further submissions once the AMETI project is known Further information Whole Proposal Corporate 8 Sylvia Park Road Body 126453 Provide assurance that the eastern end of the EWL will be open at the same time as the western end Further information Whole Proposal Corporate I call on the board of inquiry to instruct NZTA to make available all correspondence already communicated to them in regards to this that they have stated in their application as consultation with the community as well as their Consultation - local 126477 Airport Harbour View Motel responses. I believe there have been numerous community ideas / resolutions provided throughout this submission Whole Proposal community that could have assisted NZTA however have witnessed some of this such feedback discarded as it did not come from their engineers.
Seek that the application be declined so that NZTA can properly consider alternative designs to better avoid, 126323 Amphora Investments Ltd Alternatives Whole Proposal remedy, or mitigate adverse effects of the proposal on the environment and the coastal environment.
126323 Amphora Investments Ltd Seek that the application be declined so that NZTA can properly consult with stakeholders Consultation Whole Proposal
126158 Ashurst, R cycle routes and foot paths are dedicated, separate, and protected routes Paths - separated cycle paths Whole Proposal
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location Consultation - local 126178 Aska, S Instruct NZTA to do proper consultation with the local people Whole Proposal community
Design the new road so that it is capable of including links to the eastern side of the eastern side of the Southern 126277 Auckland Business Forum Alternatives Whole Proposal motorway, and addition of a third lane in the future to cope with Aucklands growth.
To be assured that: Cost-effective alternatives to the proposed traffic lights to control traffic to and from the 126277 Auckland Business Forum new road and local road connections are provided; smart, innovative traffic management will need to be a part of Design Whole Proposal the solution.
Ensure that there is appropriate separation and screening of the pedestrian and cycleway connection from the 126277 Auckland Business Forum Paths - landscape Whole Proposal road component of the project – for safety as well as noise and aesthetic benefits. NZTA to undertake design and provide updated land acquisition plans that reduce the amount of land take to limit 126336 Auckland Council the impact on the parks and confirm that land take is minimised as much as possible to limit the impact on Acquisition Whole Proposal reserves. The Council seeks some amendments to the proposed conditions of consent, particularly in relation to the 126336 Auckland Council Construction Air Quality Management Plan (CAQMP) to ensure that the dust monitoring recommended by the Air Air Quality Whole Proposal Quality Report is specified as a bottom-line for the project.
The Council requests further information to assess the transport constraints that led to this alignment and to 126336 Auckland Council confirm that there was not an alternative option that provides project benefits with lesser adverse effects to Alternatives Whole Proposal identified Outstanding Natural Features (ONF) and Significant Ecological Areas.
The conditions should require the Project arborist to work with the Council arborists as the construction progresses 126336 Auckland Council Arboriculture Whole Proposal to ensure that effective protocols for tree protection and management are followed.
The Council seeks the preparation of a Construction Management Plan to address congestion, reduction of 126336 Auckland Council amenity, traffic diversion and to protect the safety and amenity of all modes, including pedestrian, cycle, bus and Construction - management Whole Proposal local traffic The Council is willing to work with NZTA in developing this plan.
The Council request further information in relation to either the assessment of the effects of the construction or Construction - traffic 126336 Auckland Council how this is to be mitigated with particular emphasis on, but not limited to: Neilson Street interchange, Great South Whole Proposal management Road, Pedestrian, Cyclists, and Public Transport
The conditions related to the Construction Traffic Management Plan contain specific performance criteria for Public Transport. An additional clause should be provided to Draft Condition CT.2 as follows: “Where road closures Construction - traffic 126336 Auckland Council Whole Proposal or restrictions cannot reasonably be avoided, the particular vulnerabilities and sensitivities of cycle route diversions management and reduced conditions shall be taken into account in the planning of any closures or restrictions”
Ensure the project provides Mana Whenua recognition in the design of key urban design and 126336 Auckland Council landscape elements, including implementing the ideas contained in the Urban Design and Landscape Framework Cultural Whole Proposal plan. Weed and animal pest control should cover the entire designation along with a buffer where possible, on adjacent 126336 Auckland Council public land and private land with the consent of landowners. Weed and animal pest control will need to continue Ecology Whole Proposal indefinitely.
The Council would like access to any work done on how the estimated gross and net economic benefits may have 126336 Auckland Council Economics Whole Proposal changed given adjustments to the preferred option since the Business Case was completed. Following on from requests set out in the Transport and Traffic section of this submission, the Council would like 126336 Auckland Council access to the modelling used to estimate the gross and net economic benefits, much of which will likely have Economics Whole Proposal followed from the transport benefits estimated. The Council requests the NZTA provide sufficient on-street parking to mitigate the effects of the 126336 Auckland Council Facilities - parking Whole Proposal proposal. The Council seeks access to the transport modelling undertaken to assess the scheme, including 126336 Auckland Council Further information Whole Proposal details of peer review and input assumptions to the transport models. The Council requests evidence of sensitivity testing of the Onehunga area to demonstrate there is 126336 Auckland Council adequate network capacity to account for reasonable uncertainty and future growth aspirations for the Panuku Further information Whole Proposal Transform Onehunga project area. Provision of satisfactory evidence to demonstrate the efficiency and safety of the local road network will not be 126336 Auckland Council Further information Whole Proposal compromised as a result of the project.
Provide further analysis on adequate access for over dimension vehicles along the EWL given the industrial nature of the local area. In particular: i. evidence to demonstrate that the proposed alignment meets the 126336 Auckland Council Further information Whole Proposal geometry requirements for all vehicles using the corridor which should include over dimension and HPMV vehicles. ii. Safe facilities for maintenance and emergency access to the foreshore be identified.
Provide evidence that the safety of all road users, including active modes has been considered in the 126336 Auckland Council design with specific reference to the ability to accommodate large vehicles through appropriate lane Further information Whole Proposal widths and link radii. Provide additional evidence related to the assessment of operational performance at intersections 126336 Auckland Council where queueing may impair efficiency. Additional signage may be required to support safe efficient Further information Whole Proposal route choice between the local road network and EWL.
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location The Council seeks to understand how the EWL will support high quality and efficient public transport connections (including the option of heavy rail) around these future development areas and the wider network, and any 126336 Auckland Council Further information Whole Proposal amendments required to the EWL to ensure that efficient provision of public transport is not prevented or hindered.
Provide evidence demonstrating the three dimensional form of the proposal including 3D modelling/animation (surface only visuals rather than full detail including landscape) allowing a fly through of key 126336 Auckland Council complex areas to allow the impact and suitability of the alignment to be assessed and to determine the potential Further information Whole Proposal impact on urban design outcomes. The areas where this is considered important are: the Neilson Interchange area, the connection with the future mass rapid transit link and the Anns Creek/ Great South Road interchange.
Ensure planning and infrastructure integration at the Onehunga Wharf and town centre area including in relation to Auckland Transport’s MRT project and potential routes for that. In doing so ensure the proposed vertical 126336 Auckland Council Future - rail Whole Proposal alignments of future MRT and how they relate to the EWL and all other spaces and routes around are described to enable understanding of different configurations and their effects.
The Council seeks the following changes to the proposed project conditions: i. HH.3(d): The Heritage Management Plan shall be provided to the Heritage Unit Manager in addition to the regulatory function manager. ii. HH.4(d): Should include specific reference to using methods that minimise vibration effects to built heritage. iii. HH.5(d) and (e): In addition to pre- and post-survey reports, there must be active monitoring of structural condition during 126336 Auckland Council Heritage Whole Proposal construction. iv. HH.5(c) and (d): All (pre and post) survey and outcomes shall be provided to the landowner and Auckland Council. v. HH.5(e): If any damage is caused and is made good, this shall be done in consultation with and receives approval by Auckland Council prior to works commencing. vi. 31 Frank Grey Place should be recorded prior to its removal and relocated preferably to a Ōtāhuhu location. This building is likely a pre-1900 site.
The Council seeks amendments to the NZTA’s proposed conditions related to historic heritage features (including 126336 Auckland Council Heritage Whole Proposal additions and amendments to the proposed Historic Heritage Management Plan). That the proposed conditions provide for the documentation of any historic heritage sites (both pre and post-1900 126336 Auckland Council periods) exposed during land disturbance activities. That the proposed conditions do not conflict with the Heritage Whole Proposal archaeological values of scheduled buildings affected by this proposal.
The Council to be involved in the development and implementation of the Urban and Landscape Design Framework 126336 Auckland Council Management Plans Whole Proposal and development of the signage masterplan associated with the boardwalk /walkway / cycleway areas.
Conditions that provide the opportunity for the Council to review and approve detailed design for planting/landscape plans and engineering plans (in reserves, land to vest, streetscape) and sign off of new assets to be vested in the Council. The maintenance period for NZTA is to be a minimum of two years for ‘landscape’ 126336 Auckland Council Management Plans Whole Proposal treatment and five years for ‘restoration’ planting such as the stormwater ponds/wetland areas. The maintenance frequency and specification should be the same as that of the Council’s maintenance standards for equivalent areas.
126336 Auckland Council The NZTA to provide regular and adequate maintenance access points to all Council maintained areas. Management Plans Whole Proposal
The applicant should provide a comprehensive description of noise effects for all receivers including those not 126336 Auckland Council Defined as Protected Premises and Facilities, with additional specific details on the nature of the significant Noise and Vibration Whole Proposal adverse effects that will be generated where the standard project noise limits cannot be met.
The applicant should undertake a comprehensive evaluation of the activities in the existing environment to determine the proximity of any particularly sensitive activities (such as businesses operating sensitive equipment 126336 Auckland Council Noise and Vibration Whole Proposal including microscopes, printing facilities, medical equipment and sensitive manufacturing equipment) and the magnitude of adverse construction vibration effects that is likely.
The applicant should provide a comprehensive description of the methods that will be used to determine the nature of the receiving environment again immediately prior to works commencing in each area, and a detailed 126336 Auckland Council Noise and Vibration Whole Proposal description of the methods that will be used to minimise the effects of construction vibration on sensitive activities as far as practicable
The applicant should provide a description of the subjective effects of construction vibration at the levels that may 126336 Auckland Council Noise and Vibration Whole Proposal be experienced by the various receivers, including where noncompliance with the project standards is expected. The applicant should provide a draft version of the CNVMP at this stage so that the receivers and decision makers 126336 Auckland Council can properly understand the methods that the NZTA is proposing to manage the effects of construction noise and Noise and Vibration Whole Proposal vibration.
The applicant should provide a more detailed description of the proposed blasting activities and should include the 126336 Auckland Council Noise and Vibration Whole Proposal effects of any rock breaking, rock drilling and blasting in the noise and vibration assessments.
The applicant should consider an improvement to the process described in CNV.6 to provide a greater level of 126336 Auckland Council rigour in the determination of the BPO for construction works that generate noise and/or vibration levels above Noise and Vibration Whole Proposal the standard project criteria. Approval or certification of the schedule by the Council may be appropriate.
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location
The inclusion of an assessment of effects is a welcome addition to the relatively objective assessment required by NZS6806, (the absence of an assessment of the subjective noise effects arising from the implementation of a roading project has been criticised in the past on other projects). The assessment of the likely noise effects in TR7 126336 Auckland Council Noise and Vibration Whole Proposal should be updated, however, to include the additional categories as set out in the Miedema and Oudshoorn work, (%LA and %A) which will also provide (by inference) an insight into the percentage of the population who are not annoyed by the noise effects.
TR7 should be updated to include an assessment of the likely effects of road traffic noise on any other receivers that could be sensitive to noise but that are not PPFs as defined by NZS6806:2010. This includes (but is not limited 126336 Auckland Council to) open space used for formal and informal recreation, Waikaraka Park, Waikaraka Cemetery and Gloucester Noise and Vibration Whole Proposal Park. The assessment should include consideration of mitigation to minimise noise levels as far as practicable to those receivers. The applicant should consider how the magnitude of operational noise effects that is considered by the decision 126336 Auckland Council makers for the current design can be ‘capped’ so that any changes to the design do not generate a greater level of Noise and Vibration Whole Proposal adverse effect. The Council seeks modifications to the EWL to reduce the distance between crossing facilities on the EWL and 126336 Auckland Council Paths Whole Proposal improved connectivity and amenity for key walk and cycle desire lines through Onehunga. 126336 Auckland Council For the shared paths, provide plans of each level where multiple levels are intended. Paths Whole Proposal Amend the project to ensure all footpaths along the edge of the EWL are of generous and consistent width, and 126336 Auckland Council Paths Whole Proposal are separated from the carriageway by a planted strip. The Board would like to request information on the predicted increase numbers of vehicles, and how fumes from Auckland Council - Māngere- 126336 vehicle’s emissions and noise pollution have on the local community, when this development is operative and its Further information Whole Proposal Ōtāhuhu Local Board construction phase.
Auckland Council - Māngere- The board request that best practice is adhered, to avoid reclamation of the coastline, keeping its integrity and 126336 Reclamation Whole Proposal Ōtāhuhu Local Board minimalizing any interruption to the area’s ecological system, fishing and natural life characteristics.
Seeks that reclamation best practice is adhered to by avoiding unnecessary reclamation and minimising Auckland Council - Māngere- 126336 reclamation that affects the area’s ecological system and that best practice advice for managing mangroves Reclamation Whole Proposal Ōtāhuhu Local Board ensures it does not become the dominant vegetation in the ecological system.
We demand that the NZTA and the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki local board establish a joint working group on the Auckland Council - redevelopment and mitigation of the adverse effects of the East West Link project on the local area. Approximately 126336 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Consultation - specific Whole Proposal 12 hectares of Council land will be used for the East West Link and we will be seeking commensurate mitigation Board from the NZTA. Auckland Council - The current design needs to futureproof mass transit options and incorporate a MRT connection within the scope 126336 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Future - rail Whole Proposal of the project. Board Auckland Council - We demand that the impact on local community during construction of the project is appropriated mitigated. 126336 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Mitigation Whole Proposal NZTA needs to work with the local board, Onehunga Business Association and local community groups. Board Auckland Council - We want to see environmental impacts appropriated mitigated and use opportunities presented by this project for 126336 Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Mitigation Whole Proposal enhancement of some of the natural features in this area that have been neglected Board
Auckland Council - Advice note: The Requiring Authority is required under the Water Supply and Wastewater Network Bylaw 2015, to 126336 Utilities Whole Proposal Watercare obtain approval from Watercare before works commence within close proximity to Watercare assets.
The requiring authority (NZTA) shall prepare and implement a Network Utilities Management Plan. The plan shall be prepared in consultation with the relevant infrastructure providers who have existing network utilities that are Auckland Council - 126336 directly affected by the Project. The purpose of the plan is to ensure that the design and construction of the Project Utilities - management plan Whole Proposal Watercare takes account of and includes measures to address the safety, integrity, protection and where necessary the relocation of existing network utilities.
The Network Utilities Management Plan shall include the procedures, methods and measures that demonstrate how construction works will meet safety procedures required by Watercare for works within the vicinity of its Auckland Council - assets and; Details of areas within which additional management measures are required. Watercare Assets: 126336 Utilities - management plan Whole Proposal Watercare Onehunga Harbour Rd – grade separated section local connections; Hunua 1 watermain at Sylvia Park Rd/Great South Rd intersection; Sylvia Park watermain; Hunua 3 watermain; Hunua 4 watermain; Eastern interceptor Westfield Siphon
The requiring authority shall consult with Watercare and must enter into an infrastructure agreement (‘Entrusted Works Agreement’) satisfactory to Watercare (acting reasonably) that, amongst other things: a. identifies Auckland Council - potentially affected Watercare assets, b. details how affected Watercare assets are to be addressed, c. ensures 126336 Utilities - operation Whole Proposal Watercare Watercare assets will be protected and function maintained to Watercare’s satisfaction, d. maintains Watercare’s continuing access and operation of its affected assets, e. addresses the matter of betterment (if any) and how the costs are to be apportioned, f. agrees contractor(s) to undertake any works on Watercare’s assets.
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location
In the period before construction begins on the Project, the following activities undertaken by network utility operators will not prevent or hinder the Project, and can be undertaken without seeking the Requiring Authority’s written approval under section 176(1)(b) of the RMA: a. Operation, maintenance and urgent repair works of Auckland Council - 126336 existing network utilities; b. Minor renewal works to existing network utilities necessary for the on-going provision Utilities - operation Whole Proposal Watercare or security of supply of network utility operations; c. Minor works such as new service connections; d. Upgrade and replacement of existing network utilities within the same location with the same or similar effects as the existing utility.
A new condition requiring the site accesses for heavy vehicles are identified. Where these are local roads, these 126354 Auckland Transport shall be surveryed and monitored, and any accelerated damage or wear attributable to construction traffic shall Construction - damage Whole Proposal be rehabilited by the NZTA, or as otherwise agreed by AT at the close of the project.
Proposed condition DC.12 should include the full range of transport-related construction effects to be considered Construction - traffic 126354 Auckland Transport Whole Proposal in the development of Outline Plans, including rail, walking and cycling and car parking. management Proposed condition CT.1 should include provision for public transport, walking and cycling, car parking and site Construction - traffic 126354 Auckland Transport Whole Proposal access routes for heavy traffic management Proposed condition CT.2 should include: traffic modelling as a means of evaluating the effects of temporary traffic management on the network; alternative bus routing and whether these can be accommodated by services Construction - traffic 126354 Auckland Transport Whole Proposal requiring diversion; requirement to have no significant level of service reduction for bus or rail services, process management for rail closures.
126354 Auckland Transport Proposed condition DC.10 should require consultation with AT in respect of any changes made to the CTMP. Consultation - specific Whole Proposal
126354 Auckland Transport NZTA work with AT, KiwiRail and Vector to ensure the security of the power supply to electric trains. Future - rail Whole Proposal 126354 Auckland Transport New conditions should address rail line closures General Whole Proposal Proposed condition DC.9 should cross-reference the Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) to the CTM 126354 Auckland Transport Management Plans Whole Proposal Conditions 126354 Auckland Transport New conditions should address: full AT involvement in respect of the above matters Submitter specific Whole Proposal A condition should state that any assets to be vested in AT shall meet relevant AT codes of practice and/or 126354 Auckland Transport Submitter specific Whole Proposal engineering standards 126354 Auckland Transport New conditions should ensure security of power supply to electric trains Utilities Whole Proposal Add consent conditions that any closures of any existing walking and cycling links for construction works need to Construction - traffic 126253 Bike Auckland be minimised in extent and duration as much as practical (similar to the condition in that regard in the Waterview Whole Proposal management EPA). Bike Auckland seeks to be noted in the consent conditions as one of the stakeholders in further design and 126253 Bike Auckland Consultation - specific Whole Proposal approval processes after EPA.
126135; 126183; 126244; Bosson, T; Brighouse, N; I wish to see the Agency directed to work closer with Auckland Council, Panuku Development Auckland, 126226; 126265; 126133; Gibson, N; Harries, T; King, Consultation Whole Proposal Transpower and local groups to get a more desirable outcome for all. 126196 M; Palmer, G; Read, L;
126213 Brown, D Tell them to pull their heads in and get real! Miscellaneous opinion Whole Proposal 126210 Buklijas, T A full business case, cost-benefit analysis, and comparison with other plans is requested Economics Whole Proposal I seek to see an analysis that would consider investing into other forms of transport (in particular rail) that could 126210 Buklijas, T divert some of the traffic currently running along motorways and potentially make building another motorway Further information Whole Proposal redundant. Centre for Urban Transport 126646 The existing proposal should be replaced with the proposal described in the CUTS submission. Alternatives Whole Proposal Studies That if the East West Link is approved, that clear direction and guidance be given to NZTA as part of that approval, 126562 Chamko Holdings Ltd determining timeframes for Notice of Requirement issuance, compensation and timeframes for completion of that Consultation Whole Proposal process. 126160 Clarke, R Accept Option B instead Alternatives Whole Proposal Ecological habitats removed for the construction should be replaced and significantly improved upon, increasing 126317 Cummuskey, P Ecology - habitat Whole Proposal the area's suitability for wildlife as well as for public amenity. Existing walkway and cycleway features removed as part of the project should be replaced and improved upon 126317 Cummuskey, P Paths Whole Proposal across the length of the project area. NZTA need to provide information describing the process taken (analysis of traffic movements projected in the 126381 Davidson, G Neilson Street interchange and surrounding urban roads) to arrive at their proposal Further information Whole Proposal and an opportunity to discuss alternatives with local users including business and transport users.
126126 de Haan, N Alternative designs should be considered, including the OBA/TOES design, and the submitters own design. Alternatives Whole Proposal
A comprehensive mitigation package is required that fully avoids, remedies, mitigates, or offsets the significant 126404 Department of Conservation Environment Whole Proposal adverse effects of the proposal on ecological values, and provides a net conservation gain.
Require a comprehensive mitigation package are imposed that fully avoid, remedy, mitigate and offset the significant adverse impacts of the proposal on ecological values, and preferably provide a net conservation gain. These should address the concerns raised in this submission. These conditions are required to be imposed to 126404 Department of Conservation Mitigation Whole Proposal ensure the proposal is consistent with relevant planning documents, such as the NZCPS and the AUP (including operative and proposed provisions at this time), and consistent with the purpose and principles of the Resource Management Act 1991. Recognise the scarcity and value of the land and location to existing land owners and users by minimising 126886 Dilworth Trust Board Construction - disruption Whole Proposal construction disruption and overall land take requirement.
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location Recognise the business impact to affected land owners and users both during project construction and longer term 126886 Dilworth Trust Board Economics Whole Proposal because of the project. 126342 First Gas Limited Framework for both enabling and protecting the high pressure gas network is established Utilities whole proposal Fisher and Paykel Healthcare All possibilities to include a fully separated, protected cycleway for the entire length of the EWL should be 126311 Paths - separated cycle paths Whole Proposal Cycling Community considered, shared paths should be a last resort.
126312 Forest and Bird The design should be modified so the proposed alignment avoids threatened and rare biodiversity and ecosystems Ecology Whole Proposal Forest and Bird Auckland 126235 No road building in this area Miscellaneous opinion Whole Proposal Central Branch Conditions should include the provision of space to increase the railway corridors from South Auckland to Central 126176 Frank, T Future - rail Whole Proposal Auckland via Panmure and Newmarket to four-track corridors. 126705 Green, V There's a better way Miscellaneous Whole Proposal Any effects on archaeological sites will be subject to conditions under the authority (NZTA to apply for) under the Heritage New Zealand HNZPTA 2014. These conditions will suffice and do not need to be duplicated. Where it is considered that an 126638 Heritage whole proposal Pouhere Taonga archaeological authority is not reqquired, the work should proceed under an appropriate accidental discovery protocol. Heritage New Zealand 126638 Minor amendments to built heritage sites should be subject to a structural condition survey Heritage whole proposal Pouhere Taonga
Heritage New Zealand There should be a firm commitment by NZTA to more quality urban and landscape design in the proposal, 126638 Landscape Design whole proposal Pouhere Taonga sensitive to the historical connections and integrated with the other projects and initiatives is required.
126310 Infrastructure New Zealand NZTA should provide a 30 year plan for Auckland's strategic network Management Plans Whole Proposal
Jackson Electrical Industries Require the NZTA to properly consider alternatives and redesign the Onehunga part of the proposal to better 126349 Alternatives Whole Proposal Limited avoid remedy or mitigate the adverse effects of the proposal on the environment. Jackson Electrical Industries Consultation - local 126349 The Agency should better engage with the Community and stakeholders Whole Proposal Limited community
126333 Knight, L The ongoing issues for the community created by this proposal need to be mitigated and paid for by NZTA Mitigation Whole Proposal 126249 Lacey, R Make financial sense Miscellaneous opinion Whole Proposal 126249 Lacey, R Include properly designated cycleways (not just shared paths) Paths - separated cycle paths Whole Proposal
Lacey, R; Lee, M; Luijken, P; 126249; 126306; 126208; Young, S; Ashurst, R; The proposal should provide for the protection of future rapid transport/rail to the south and ensure the rail 126170; 126158; 126317; Future - rail Whole Proposal Cummuskey, P; KiwiRail corridor is not blocked. 126380; 126253; Holdings Ltd; Bike Auckland;
126208 Luijken, P Improve the cycling facilities offered Paths Whole Proposal Makaurau Marae Maori Further information is sought from NZTA on the extent to which it is providing mitigation 126569 Consultation whole proposal Trust and remediation that should be funded by other parties
Conditions should avoid, remedy, mitgate, and offset adverse effects on: Heritage management and cultural Makaurau Marae Maori monitoring to address adverse cultural effects; Research into baseline health of Mangere Inlet (using biodiversity 126569 Cultural Whole proposal Trust and mauri/cultural indicators) and actions to improve same; Cultural design of infrastructure to address heritage and cultural connections; Cultural offsetting and mitigation; Restoration of Manukau Harbour more holistically
Makaurau Marae Maori Detailed information and commitments to funding are required, and a long term plan to not just prevent 126569; 126364 Environment Whole Proposal Trust; Te Kawerau a Maki contamination but restore to full health (mauri) and maintain that position; 126211 McLeod, J Undertake traffic modelling for SH20 from Airport to North Further information Whole Proposal 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Amend draft condition DC.11 as per submission (Access) Access Whole Proposal
As soon as practicable following Completion of Construction, the Requiring Authority shall: (a) Review the extent of the area designated for the Project; (b) In consultation with relevant landowners, identify 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd any areas of designated land that are no longer necessary for the on-going operation, maintenance or mitigation Acquisition whole proposal of effects of the Project; and (c) Give notice to the Council in accordance with section 182 of the RMA for the removal of those parts of the designation identified in (b) above.
At the completion of Construction Works the Requiring Authority shall give notice to the Council in accordance with 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Section 182 of the RMA seeking the removal of those parts of the designation, that are not specifically required by Acquisition whole proposal the Requiring Authority for the highway road.
Mercury seeks that adverse air quality effects be avoided, including dust from the construction (including concrete 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Air Quality whole proposal batching facility), where effects on electricity infrastructure cannot be appropriately mitigated. 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Amend draft condition AQ.1 as per submission (Air Quality) Air Quality Whole Proposal 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Amend draft conditions CB.1, CB.2, CB.4 as per submission (Air Quality) Air Quality Whole Proposal Construction - traffic 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Amend draft condition CT.3 as per submission (Construction) Whole Proposal management
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location
The Chief Executive of the Council shall nominate a person who has the requisite skill and expertise to review the Outline of Final Design and certify that it complies with the conditions of this designation and the Requiring Authority shall not commence construction of the Project until: (a) The Outline of Final Design has been certified in 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Design Whole Proposal full; or (b) That part of the Outline of Final Design submitted in respect of a specific stage of the Project has been so certified; and NZTA shall amend the Outline of Final Design (or part thereof) as reasonably required by that nominated person. The Project will be carried out in general accordance with the approved Outline of Final Design.
As part of the Outline Plan(s) prepared under Section 176A of the RMA, the Requiring Authority shall submit (and may submit in stages corresponding to any staged construction programme) to the Chief Executive of the Council, information (including plans) detailing final designs (the “Outline of Final Design”) in general accordance with the AEE and plans submitted and showing: (a) Sufficient information to confirm that the outcomes of DC.13 are met; (b) The programme for the carrying out of the proposed work (including staging details, if applicable); (c) The location of the proposed motorway carriageway in relation to the designation boundaries; (d) The location and design of all acoustic fences, bunds and barriers so as to appropriately avoid or mitigate adverse effects on 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd adjoining properties and receiving environments; (e) The extent, location and nature of major earthworks including Further information Whole Proposal details on how land will be reinstated post construction; (f) The location and design of erosion silt control structures; (g) Landscaping proposed including details of landscape planting and treatment of batters and reinstatement of existing vegetation; (h) Ecological mitigation works; (i) The extent, location and nature of protection, or if not practicable, the replacement of the earthgrid. Any replacement must be operational before the existing earthgrid is removed or modified; (j) Any arrangements agreed with Mercury with respect to protection of existing cogeneration assets and covering those matters as raised by Mercury, including but in no way limiting those matters to noise, dust, vibration and access.
126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Undertake a new assessment of the 16 options by correctly applying criteria C22 within the multi-criteria analysis. Further information Whole Proposal 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Amend draft designation condition NU.1 as per submission (Network Utilities Management Plan) Management Plans Whole Proposal 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Amend draft condition AQ.2 as per submission (Construction Air Quality Management Plan) Management Plans Whole Proposal 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Amend draft condition CT.2 as per submission (Construction Traffic Management Plan) Management Plans Whole Proposal 126377 Mercury NZ Ltd Amend draft condition CNV.5 as per submission (Vibration and shock) Noise and Vibration Whole Proposal A Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) shall be prepared by a suitably qualified person and in Construction - traffic 126360 Ministry of Education Whole Proposal consultation with Auckland Transport. management Regarding the NoR's The Requiring Authority shall establish and co-ordinate a Community Liaison Group (CLG). The Requiring Authority shall assist the CLG to hold regular meetings (at least once every three months) Consultation - local 126360 Ministry of Education Whole Proposal throughout the construction period in these areas. The CLG shall continue until six months after Completion of community Construction. 126270 Monahan Properties Ltd Review alternatives and ensure land take for roading and/or stormwater purposes is minimised. Alternatives Whole Proposal There should be no final reporting or public hearing convened until final decisions have been made on the Auckland 126270 Monahan Properties Ltd Unitary Plan appeals in the High Court and the Environment Court concerning the Transpower issues including Utilities Whole Proposal controls on land uses. 126383 Ngai Tai ki Tamaki Recognise and acknowledge the cultural importance of the area. Cultural Whole Proposal 126383 Ngai Tai ki Tamaki Te Reo me ona tikanga to be implemented throughout the project Submitter specific Whole Proposal Ngai Tai ki Tamaki; Ngati 126383; 126358; 126522 Cultural monitoring protocols should be upheld Cultural Whole Proposal Maru Runanga; Ngati Paoa
Ngai Tai ki Tamaki; Ngati 126383; 126358; 126522 Mana Whenua partership should continue throughout the project Submitter specific Whole Proposal Maru Runanga; Ngati Paoa 126522 Ngati Paoa Revitalisation of Mana Whenua identity across the East West Link and wider cultural landscape. Cultural Whole Proposal 126522 Ngati Paoa Cultural offsetting and mitigation. Cultural Whole proposal The submitter would like input into selection and supply of appropriate plant and tree specimens, that are eco- 126522 Ngati Paoa Environment Whole Proposal sourced and reflect taonga species or indigenous biodiversity. NZ Heavy Haulage 126376 Traffic Management Plans should be prepared in consultation with the oversize frieght industry Management Plans Whole Proposal Association Formally recognise that the completion of the project could lead to an increase in the number of times annually 126152 Oji Fibre Solutions Air Quality Whole Proposal that local NOx levels exceed the NES air quaility guidance. A condition requiring prior notification and suitable alternative arrangements be made where continuity of a 24/7 126152 Oji Fibre Solutions Utilities - operation Whole Proposal operation of infrastructure service cannot be assured.
126115 PATH The route needs to provide for a cycle path separate from motor vehicles and pedestrians Paths - separated cycle paths Whole Proposal
Ports of Auckland Ltd (POAL) seeks amendments to the Transport Agency's proposed conditions to provide a more 126346 Ports of Auckland Ltd robust process, requiring consultation and engagement with affected stakeholders, for the development of the Consultation Whole Proposal management plans that are intended to avoid, remedy or mitigate the Project's effects on POAL's land.
126643 Roskill Community Voice We would like to be informed about employment opportunities associated with the project Employment Whole Proposal Consideration of the costs and benefits of undergrounding and other measures to mitigate the impact of high 126643 Roskill Community Voice Utilities - undergrounding Whole Proposal voltage transmission lines in the area covered by the project, neighbouring suburbs and the Manukau Harbour Seeks that the various proposed resource consents and designations sought as part of the East West Link be 126340 Sanford Limited Opposition Whole Proposal declined
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location
Proposed additional condition to NU.1 and NU.2 That the Requiring Authority shall prepare and implement in consultation with Spark and related Telecommunications and infrastructure providers a Network Utilities Plan enable the provision within East West Link for future network utilities requirements. The plan is to ensure that the Spark New Zealand Trading 126279 design and construction of the project includes for as reasonably appropriate the future proofing provision of Utilities - management plan Whole Proposal Limited telecommunications and other infrastructure via measures such as ducting or other means to be agreed with Spark and infrastructure providers. This could form an additional chapter of the NUMP (Network Utilities Management Plan).
126280 Syl Park Investments Ltd Seek submissions once the impact of the Auckland Manakau Eastern Transport Initiative project is known Further information Whole Proposal 126280 Syl Park Investments Ltd Provide assurance that the eastern end of the EWL will be open at the same time as the western end General Whole Proposal Cultural design of infrastructure to address heritage and cultural connections, in conjunction with Te Kawerau a 126364 Te Kawerau a Maki Cultural Whole Proposal Maki 126364 Te Kawerau a Maki Include cultural offsetting and mitigation Cultural Whole Proposal There is a legal obligation on polluters to address contamination, regardless of the benefits of NZTA's offsetting 126364 Te Kawerau a Maki Environment - pollution Whole Proposal regime Detailed wording for proposed conditions will be provided in legal submissions and evidence for any hearing but 126364 Te Kawerau a Maki includes without limitation: Addressing adverse effects of climate change (including stormwater containment and Further information Whole Proposal management)
Detailed wording for proposed conditions will be provided in legal submissions and evidence for any hearing but 126364 Te Kawerau a Maki Heritage Whole Proposal includes without limitation: Heritage management and cultural monitoring to address adverse cultural effects
Further information is sought from NZTA on the extent to which it is providing mitigation and remediation that 126364 Te Kawerau a Maki should be funded by other parties (particularly consented landfill sites)…and the linkage between NZTA's proposal Mitigation Whole Proposal for restoration of mauri, and the actual effects of the East-West Link
Seek conditions that encourage enhancement of: The integration, maintenance, repair, remediation or future 126384 Te Runanga o Ngati Whatua Construction - damage Whole Proposal proof steps for the social and environmental relationships with the construction area of the proposal Seek conditions that encourage enhancement of: The project’s benefits over its cost as well as the adverse effects 126384 Te Runanga o Ngati Whatua Economics Whole Proposal on the environment within the construction zone proposed Seek conditions that encourage enhancement of: Environmental effects that are enduring with measures 126384 Te Runanga o Ngati Whatua Environment - mitigation Whole Proposal proposed to mitigate any effects on the environment adverse or otherwise Seek conditions that encourage enhancement of the access and integration of the operational aspects of the state 126384 Te Runanga o Ngati Whatua General Whole Proposal highway network in order to balance these needs with RMA-based matters Seek conditions that encourage enhancement of: The outstanding natural features and landscapes and special 126384 Te Runanga o Ngati Whatua Natural Heritage Whole Proposal ecological areas [as identified in the Auckland Unitary plan]; The Campaign for Better Other alternatives are more acceptable from an environmental and economic point of view, in particular Option B 126255 Alternatives Whole Proposal Transport Inc or a further refined version of this option. That the Board instruct the NZTA to prepare a Cost Benefit Analysis consistent with the NZTA's own Economic The Campaign for Better 126255 Evaluation Manual to determine that the project has net postive benefits to the local community and to the wider Economics Whole Proposal Transport Inc economy. The Campaign for Better Decline the proposal, which is eye-wateringly expensive and carries the risk of misappropriating scarce economic 126255 Miscellaneous opinion Whole Proposal Transport Inc resources to a project which carries no proven economic benefits. The Manukau Harbour Such other modifications as will address the specific effects and deficiencies referred to in this submission including 126319 Restoration Society in particular appropriately avoiding remedying or mitigating the effects of the proposal on the coastal Coastal Processes - mitigation Whole Proposal Incorporated environment.
TOES; Farrell, F; Furness, S; Various; 126837; 126758; Fyfe Group Ltd; Gregory, S; 126242; 126719; 126379; I call on the Board of Inquiry to instruct NZTA to properly engage and take feedback from the local community to Consultation - local Heaton, J; Jobe, N; Lane, G; Whole Proposal 126450; 126796; 126446; address the social and environmental issues raised by submitters. community Laurent, M; Lee, N; Williams, 126301; 126832; S;
Transcon Warkworth 2015 126153 Ensure a minimal number of light-controlled intersections feature to keep things flowing as much as possible Traffic Whole Proposal Ltd A copy of the NUMP shall be provided to the Manager for information at least 20 working days prior to the Transpower New Zealand 126378 commencement of any Enabling Works or Commencement of Construction where those enabling or construction Construction Whole Proposal Limited works impact on network utilities. Unless otherwise authorised under Clause 2.2.3 of NZECP 34:2001, excavation or disturbance of the land around any Transpower transmission line support structures shall not: a) exceed a depth greater than 300mm within 6 Transpower New Zealand 126378 metres of the outer edge of the visible foundations of any tower or monopole; or b) exceed a depth greater than 3 Utilities Whole Proposal Limited metres between 6 metres and 12 metres of the outer edge of the visible foundation of any tower or monopole; or c) destabilise any tower or monopole.
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location
The Requiring Authority shall prepare and implement a Network Utilities Management Plan (NUMP). The NUMP shall be prepared in consultation with the relevant infrastructure providers who have existing network utilities that are directly affected by the Project. The purpose of the NUMP is to ensure that the design and construction of the Project takes account of, and includes, measures to address the safety, integrity, protection and (where Transpower New Zealand 126378 necessary) the relocation of existing network utilities. The NUMP shall be prepared in consultation with Utilities - management plan Whole Proposal Limited Transpower and a draft must be provided to Transpower for its review and comment at least 6 months prior to it being submitted to the Council as required by Condition NU.2. A record of consultation and any comments provided by Transpower on the final draft must be included with the final NUMP submitted to the Council as required by Condition NU.2.
Transpower New Zealand It is critical that the project is designed and suitable conditions and mitigation measures are put in place to ensure 126378 Utilities - operation Whole Proposal Limited the operation, maintenance, upgrading and development of the National Grid are not compromised.
Should conductive material for road infrastructure or relocated network utilities need to be used within 12m of the outer foundations of any existing Transpower transmission tower or proposed tower or monopole required as a Transpower New Zealand 126378 result of the Requiring Authority’s construction work, the Requiring Authority shall undertake a risk assessment Utilities - safety Whole Proposal Limited and implement any necessary mitigation measures to control induction and transferred voltages and Earth Potential Rise (EPR).
All machinery and mobile plant operated in association with the works shall maintain a minimum clearance Transpower New Zealand distance of 4 metres from any Transpower transmission line at all times.A warning sign to be clearly displayed at 126378 Utilities - safety Whole Proposal Limited the operator position on any mobile plant that can traverse under any Transpower transmission line stating - "WARNING, KEEP 4M MINIMUM CLEARANCE FROM TRANSMISSION LINES AT ALL TIMES."
The Requiring Authority shall ensure that any batters, retaining walls, crash barriers, fencing, sound walls and Transpower New Zealand 126378 other such physical measures do not remove practical access for ongoing access to Transpower structures during Utilities - safety Whole Proposal Limited construction and operation of the works authorised by the designation.
The conditions I would seek are that the project be updated to one that looks further into the future and provides 126093 Turner, J Future Whole Proposal the direct links for much improved traffic flows that have been detailed within the submission document. 126234 Wackrow, T & D To support the alternative design proposed by the Onehunga Advancement Society. Alternatives Whole Proposal 126234 Wackrow, T & D Protection of the recreational environment Landscape Design Whole Proposal The Transport Agency to work closely with Auckland Council, Panuku Development Auckland, Transpower and 126146 Wallbridge, L & A Consultation Whole Proposal local groups for a beneficial outcome.
126336 Auckland Council Real time turbidity monitoring with agreed limits to suspend dredging if these are breached. Coastal Processes - dredging 126336 Auckland Council Review of the position and extent of the boardwalks to minimise impact on ecology. Ecology 126336 Auckland Council Restoration planting should be maintained for longer than 5 years in some areas. Ecology - flora 126336 Auckland Council Avoid planting tall woody vegetation at Hopua Crater to maintain the preferred habitat for the pied stilt. Ecology - flora Examine the opportunity for the Karaka shell banks on the South Manakau Harbour to be given 126336 Auckland Council Ecology - habitat sanctuary status to enable the area to be utilised by displaced birds.
The Council seeks to ensure that the project provides for new research into all historic heritage along the route, 126336 Auckland Council Heritage and that this informs interpretation or educational opportunities at specific locations along the route. Ensure that the project provides the community with information at different stages of the project to enable the 126336 Auckland Council Heritage community to retain links with the water and the land. That the proposal provide different formats for interpretation for the entire route, as well as 126336 Auckland Council interpretation panels at viewing sites, and use of digital technology and web sites for the historic heritage Heritage landscape.
That the Accidental Discovery Rules outlined in E11, E12 and D17(where applicable) of the Auckland Unitary Plan – 126336 Auckland Council Heritage Operative in Part Version are applied to any land disturbance activities required as part of the project. Given the Council’s concerns about the location of the construction and its impact, the relief sought is a 126336 Auckland Council Natural Heritage realignment of the route to avoid the Anns Creek ONF. Mitigation for adverse physical effects on Te Hopua is sought in the form of restoration of the tuff exposure portion 126336 Auckland Council Natural Heritage of the ONF. Mitigation for adverse visual effects on Te Hopua is sought in the form of removal of power pylons and 126336 Auckland Council Natural Heritage undergrounding (or removal) of the transmission lines across the feature.
The Council seeks amendment to several of the draft conditions including ensuring information about the project during the construction phase is communicated to people with impairments or those with English as a second 126336 Auckland Council Social language. Also sought are some suggested amendments to the Community Liaison Group to ensure that as many people within the community are captured when information about the project is disseminated.
The Council seeks for the NZTA to work with elected members, community groups and the public generally to put 126336 Auckland Council Social in place appropriate mitigation to minimise the impact of construction on the community.
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment. List of conditions requested and relief sought as at 26 April 2017 - ordered alphabetically by Theme.
Submission Number Name Condition Relief sought Theme Location
As per Section 1 ‘Catchment Hydrology’ in the EWL Foreshore Stormwater Treatment Area Design further information (e.g., peak flow and volume) should be provided to the Council in a format that can be reviewed clearly. This is required to demonstrate that the conveyance capacity and resilience of these systems will be 126336 Auckland Council designed in order to convey the 1% AEP event (including allowance for climate change) and avoid existing flood Stormwater risks from being exacerbated. The proposal should include redundancy built in the design to address the risk of blockage of the intake structures and culverts, and sufficient hydraulic head and capacity to ensure these systems operate as intended during high tide conditions and allowing for sea level rise.
Asset Resilience (coastal): The final configuration, including operating wetland water levels, bund heights and outfalls of the wetland/biofiltration system has not been fully agreed with Council at the time of the submission. The specific pumping solution, including the specification, number and backup systems will be addressed during preliminary and detailed design phase of the project. In particular: The design must be compliant with the Stormwater Code of Practice and minimises operational costs and maximises the resilience of the asset now and 126336 Auckland Council Stormwater into the future. The Council’s preferred design solution is a single pump in option with the wetland operating water level set at ~2.8m RL, the outer bund height set at 3.4m RL and the wetland outfall set above ~2.5m RL with the bio retention outfall set as high as design allows. This option allows the wetland to drain via gravity to the coastal environment, mitigating the requirement for a second set of pumps (and associated cost) at least in the foreseeable future while complying with the NZ Coastal Policy Statement and Stormwater Code of Practice.
Asset Resilience (landward): The Council has co-developed with the EWL Alliance a concept design for the Miami 126336 Auckland Council Stream and Galway Street treatment devices that requires pumping the water quality volume and draining via Stormwater gravity through the road embankment.
The diversion system should be designed in such a manner that the Council retains the option to discharge leachate to the trade waste system. The Council requires this flexibility for the following reasons: i. During periods of extended/extensive maintenance (wetland replanting and re-establishment, forebay sediment removal etc...) diversion of leachate to the trade waste system will be necessary; ii. The treatment of leachate in stormwater wetlands is one of the innovative components of this project. Dilution of leachate with stormwater baseflow alone is likely to achieve a quality that can be discharged to the coastal marine environment in line with ANZECC guidelines. However, if the characteristics or concentrations of the leachate discharge change over time the best environmental outcome might be achieved by temporary/permanent diversion to the trade waste system; 126336 Auckland Council Stormwater iii. As stated the treatment of leachate in stormwater wetlands is an innovate approach, the longterm operational effects on the stormwater/biofiltration is, and will remain, unknown until the future. Retaining the flexibility to ensure the continued operation of the stormwater treatment assets is critical; iv. Handover period . The wetland/biofiltration assets represent an innovative approach to stormwater quality management. Continually pumping the water quality volume has inherent risks and learnings associated with the operation management of these assets. The Council seeks that NZTA vests these assets the Council after a minimum 8 year period to ensure that the assets operate in the intended manner. During this time NZTA will be fully responsible for the operation and maintenance costs.
Ensure that no alterations are made to the proposal that would further impact the natural coastline and intertidal 126116 Geoscience Society of NZ tuff exposure of the southwest side of Te Hopua volcano, nor the pahoehoe lava flow lobes within the mangroves Environment at Anns Creek Estuary west.
Italics have been used to indicate where the comment is an exact copy of the submitter comment.