Article Info: Received : 02 – 07 – 2019 http://dx.doi.org/10.18196/iclr.1210 Revised : 02 – 08 – 2019 Accepted : 20 – 08 – 2019 Volume 1 No 2, June 2019 Unitary, Federalized, or Decentralized?: P-ISSN: 2655-2353, E-ISSN: 2655-6545 The Case Study of Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta as The Special Autonomous Regions in Indonesia Ming-Hsi Sung 1, Hary Abdul Hakim2 1, 2 Department of Financial and Economic Law, Asia University, Taiwan E-mail:
[email protected] 2
[email protected] 1Assistant Professor & Director, East Asia Law Center, Department of Financial and Economic Law, Asia University, Taiwan P 2Research Assistant, PAIR Labs; Assistant Research Fellow, East Asia Law Center, Department of Financial and Economic Law, Asia University, Taiwan Abstract granting autonomy to Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta as a case study to The professed constitutional unitary argue for the latter, asserting that the case merely exemplifies the state claim has been highly debated. decentralization characteristic embedded in the Constitution. This paper Some argue that Indonesia shall be a first examines the political features of federalism through a historical unitary state in name, pursuant to legal perspective, showing that the current state system in Indonesia is Article 1 Para. III of the Indonesian decentralized but not federalized. This paper concludes that the Constitution, but Constitutional recognition of Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta as an autonomous region is reforms after 1998 when the autocratic simply a practice of constitutional decentralization. This paper also President Gen. Soeharto stepped down higlights that with recent political development, echoing that the granted broad authority to local decentralization theory is not a product of legal interpretation, but a government, leading Indonesia to a constitutional and political reality.