Richmond Regional Mass Transit Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Richmond Regional Mass Transit Study RICHMOND REGIONAL MASS TRANSIT STUDY FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT May 8, 2008 Richmond Area Metropolitan Planning Organization c/o Richmond Regional Planning District Commission 9211 Forest Hill Avenue, Suite 200 Richmond, VA 23235 804-323-2033 www.richmondregional.org RICHMOND REGIONAL MASS TRANSIT STUDY Acknowledgment Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Virginia Department of Transportation. Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the Richmond Regional Area MPO. The Richmond Regional Planning District Commission (RRPDC) is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) or the RRPDC. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. FHWA or VDOT acceptance of this report as evidence of fulfillment of the objectives of this planning study does not constitute endorsement/approval of the need for any recommended improvements nor does it constitute approval of their location and design or a commitment to fund any such improvements. Additional project level environmental impact assessments and/or studies of alternative may be necessary. RICHMOND REGIONAL MASS TRANSIT STUDY Regional Mass Transit Study Advisory Committee The Richmond Regional Planning District Commission recognizes the work of the Regional Mass Transit Study Advisory Committee who worked tirelessly to develop and review this study. The members were appointed by the Metropolitan Planning Organization and include representatives from the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) the Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) and the Elderly and Disabled Advisory Committee (EDAC): Name Role Representing Todd Eure Chairman TAC/Henrico County Lawrence C. Hagin Vice Chairman TAC/GRTC Transit System Zack Robbins Member TAC/Town of Ashland Charles Hargrove Alternate TAC/Town of Ashland Neil Holthouser Former Member TAC/Town of Ashland William R. Britton Member TAC/Charles City County John McCracken Member TAC/Chesterfield County Barbara Smith Alternate TAC/Chesterfield County Robert Hammond Member TAC/Goochland County Thomas M. W. Coleman Alternate TAC/Goochland County Joseph E. Vidunas Member TAC/Hanover County Michael Flagg Alternate TAC/Hanover County Rosemary D. Deemer Alternate TAC/Henrico County George M. Homewood Member TAC/New Kent County Rodney A. Hathaway Alternate TAC/New Kent County David T. Williams Former Member TAC/Powhatan County Wayne Holland Alternate TAC/Powhatan County Viktoria W. Badger Member TAC/City of Richmond Ralph Rhudy Alternate TAC/City of Richmond Scott H. Clark Alternate TAC/GRTC Transit System Jameson T. Auten Former Member TAC/Ridefinders Cherika Ruffin Alternate TAC/Ridefinders Von Tisdale Member TAC/Ridefinders Charles Badger Former Member TAC/DRPT Corey Hill Member TAC/DRPT Daniel Rudge Alternate TAC/DRPT Mark Riblett Member TAC/VDOT Liz McAdory Alternate TAC/VDOT Michael Testerman Member CTAC/VA Association of Railway Patrons Lloyd Vye Member CTAC/Richmond Area Bicycling Association Champe M. Burnley Alternate CTAC/Richmond Area Bicycling Association John Zeugner Member CTAC/Virginia Conservation Network Ms. Adele MacLean Alternate CTAC/Virginia Conservation Network Harris Spindle Member EDAC/Senior Connections Thelma Bland Watson Alternate EDAC/Senior Connections Kelly Hickok Member EDAC/Resources for Independent Living Sandra K. Wagener Alternate EDAC/Resources for Independent Living Cora Dickerson Member EDAC/United Way Meade H. Boswell Alternate EDAC/United Way Project Manager: Lee Yolton, Richmond Regional Planning District Commission RICHMOND REGIONAL MASS TRANSIT STUDY Richmond Area Metropolitan Planning Organization The Richmond Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is the federal and state designated regional transportation planning organization that serves as the forum for cooperative transportation decision-making in the Richmond area. The Richmond Regional Planning District Commission is the contracting agent and staff for the Richmond Area MPO. Members Town of Ashland Hanover County City of Richmond NONVOTING MEMBERS: Faye O. Prichard John E. Gordon William J. Pantele William C. Martin* Robert R. Setliff Ellen F. Robertson CTAC Joseph E. Vidunas Thomas E. Flynn Robert P. Morris Charles City County Deborah B. Coats* Viktoria W. Badger Virginia H. Axtell* Timothy W. Cotman J. Michael Flagg* Gary Duval* William R. Britton, Jr.* David P. Maloney* E. Martin Jewell* EDAC M. S. Khara* Linda G. Broady-Myers Chesterfield County Henrico County Marjorie L. Payne* Marleen K. Durfee Patricia S. O’Bannon CRAC Daniel A. Gecker E. Todd Eure Mr. John B. Rutledge FHWA James M. Holland Frank J. Thornton Jon Mathiasen* Tammye Davis R. John McCracken Ralph J. Emerson, Jr. Stan Newcomb* Edward L. Priestas* GRTC Transit System FTA Barbara K. Smith* John M. Lewis Tony A. Cho Steven E. Simonson* New Kent County Lawrence C. Hagin* James R. Banks* George M. Homewood MPO Chairman’s Citizen Stran L. Trout RMA Appointee Goochland County John A. Budesky* Robert M. Berry Charles H. Rasnick Malvern R. Butler Rodney A. Hathaway * James B. Kennedy* (Vacant) Ridefinders, Inc. Robert A. Hammond* Powhatan County Richmond Regional PDC Von S. Tisdale Karin Carmack (Vacant) Cherika Ruffin* Joseph B. Walton Daniel N. Lysy* Brandon Stidham* VA Dept. of Aviation Carson L. Tucker* VDOT P. Clifford Burnette, Jr. Thomas A. Hawthorne Mark E. Riblett* Va. Dept. of Rail and Public Transportation Charles M. Badger * Alternates Corey W. Hill* Staff (Vacant) Daniel N. Lysy Jacqueline S. Stewart Executive Director Director of Transportation Director of Planning and Information Systems Jo A. Evans Barbara S. Nelson Michelle E. Fults Interim Executive Director Principal Planner GIS Manager Peter M. Sweetland Lee Yolton + Allyson L. Finchum Finance & Contracts Administrator Principal Planner Principal Planner Julie H. Fry Jin H. Lee Joseph M. Ndanga Executive Secretary Senior Planner Senior Planner – Systems Administrator Demetra N. Jones Archita Rajbhandary Sarah G. Smith Receptionist/Secretary Associate Planner Senior Planner Sharon E. Robeson Leigh R. Medford Administrative Secretary Planning Technician – GIS David Stinson Shelly Aprill Rhonda J. Bailey Intern Intern Administrative Secretary + Study Project Manager RICHMOND REGIONAL MASS TRANSIT STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 AREA DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICE DEMAND 1.1 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................1 1.2 AREA DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICE DEMAND......................................................2 1.2.A Demographic and Employment Forecasts........................................................... 2 1.2.B Indicators of Appropriate Transit Services .........................................................12 1.3 LAND USE PLANS.................................................................................................... 20 1.3.A Town of Ashland .....................................................................................................20 1.3.B Charles City County ................................................................................................22 1.3.C Chesterfield County................................................................................................24 1.3.D Goochland County..................................................................................................27 1.3.E Hanover County ......................................................................................................29 1.3.F Henrico County........................................................................................................30 1.3.G New Kent County ....................................................................................................31 1.3.H Powhatan County...................................................................................................32 1.3.I City of Richmond ....................................................................................................33 1.4 TRANSIT GENERATORS AND ATTRACTORS........................................................ 36 1.4.A Richmond ................................................................................................................36 1.4.B North of Richmond.................................................................................................43 1.4.C South of Richmond ................................................................................................43 1.5 RAIL TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY....................................................................... 47 1.5.A Main Street Station................................................................................................48 1.5.B Light Rail Alternatives ...........................................................................................48 1.5.C Commuter Rail Alternatives .................................................................................50 1.6 TRANSPORTATION NEEDS FOR ELDERLY, DISABLED, AND LOW-INCOME PERSONS.................................................................................................................. 51 1.6.A Characteristics of the Transportation Disabled.................................................51 1.6.B Transportation Service in the Richmond Region...............................................53 1.6.C Transportation Issues............................................................................................54
Recommended publications
  • Inform Awards Interior Design & Landscape Architects Directories
    Architecture+Design in the Mid-Atlantic 2013: number three six dollars 22nd Annual Inform Awards Interior Design & Landscape Architects Directories Inform Awards · Design for Aging · Net Zero Design · Working Smarter Our service. Your solution. Our personalized service begins before the order is placed and lasts for the lifetime of your project. Long after you’ve completed a new design, you’ll continue to appreciate our 20-year warranty and dedicated service. Why Simonton? • Special order shapes and confi gurations • Custom-made windows and doors • Complete delivery within four days in most areas • Personal service • Award-winning quality — Builder Magazine Elizabeth Seton Prestwick Chase Pediatric Center Senior Living Facility Kendal on Hudson Retirement Community Specify Simonton for your next project and discover why architects, builders and consumers alike prefer Simonton. “Highest in Customer Satisfaction with Windows and Doors, Three Years in a Row” [email protected] | simonton.com/archdetails Simonton Windows received the highest numerical score among window and door manufacturers in the proprietary J.D. Power and Associates 2010-2012 Windows and Patio Doors Satisfaction Studies.SM 2012 study based on responses from 2,519 consumers measuring 11 brands and measures opinions of consumers who purchased new windows or patio doors in the previous 12 months. Proprietary study results are based on experiences and perceptions of consumers surveyed in January – February, 2012. Your experiences may vary. Visit jdpower.com 13-SIMU-7642-Northern VA-DC Arch Ad-vf.indd 1 4/4/13 10:36 AM Crenshaw_Inform_Ad_2013.pdf 1 4/9/2013 5:07:29 PM C M Y CM 1 MY CY CMY K Paul Barret, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Trips Guide Book for Photographers Revised 2008 a Publication of the Northern Virginia Alliance of Camera Clubs
    Field Trips Guide Book for Photographers Revised 2008 A publication of the Northern Virginia Alliance of Camera Clubs Copyright 2008. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced or copied in any manner whatsoever. 1 Preface This field trips guide book has been written by Dave Carter and Ed Funk of the Northern Virginia Photographic Society, NVPS. Both are experienced and successful field trip organizers. Joseph Miller, NVPS, coordinated the printing and production of this guide book. In our view, field trips can provide an excellent opportunity for camera club members to find new subject matter to photograph, and perhaps even more important, to share with others the love of making pictures. Photography, after all, should be enjoyable. The pleasant experience of an outing together with other photographers in a picturesque setting can be stimulating as well as educational. It is difficullt to consistently arrange successful field trips, particularly if the club's membership is small. We hope this guide book will allow camera club members to become more active and involved in field trip activities. There are four camera clubs that make up the Northern Virginia Alliance of Camera Clubs McLean, Manassas-Warrenton, Northern Virginia and Vienna. All of these clubs are located within 45 minutes or less from each other. It is hoped that each club will be receptive to working together to plan and conduct field trip activities. There is an enormous amount of work to properly arrange and organize many field trips, and we encourage the field trips coordinator at each club to maintain close contact with the coordinators at the other clubs in the Alliance and to invite members of other clubs to join in the field trip.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedules of Assets and Liabilities and Statement of Financial Affairs for New Ashley Stewart, Inc
    Case 14-14383-MBK Doc 170 Filed 03/31/14 Entered 03/31/14 19:45:24 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 213 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY In re: Chapter 11 ASHLEY STEWART HOLDINGS, INC., et al.,1 Case No. 14-14383 Debtors. (Jointly Administered) SCHEDULES OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AND STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL AFFAIRS FOR NEW ASHLEY STEWART, INC. CASE NO. 14-14384 1 The Debtors in these cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, are: Ashley Stewart Holdings, Inc. (6790); New Ashley Stewart, Inc. (6655); AS IP Holdings, Inc. (6890); and NAS Gift LLC (5413). The Debtors’ corporate offices are located at 100 Metro Way, Secaucus, NJ 07094. Case 14-14383-MBK Doc 170 Filed 03/31/14 Entered 03/31/14 19:45:24 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 213 GLOBAL NOTES AND STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS, METHODOLOGY, AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING DEBTOR'S SCHEDULES AND STATEMENTS Introduction On March 10, 2014 (the “Petition Date”), Ashley Stewart Holdings, Inc., New Ashley Stewart, Inc., NAS Gift Company LLC and AS IP Holdings., Inc. (collectively, “Ashley Stewart” or “Debtors”), filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey (the “Bankruptcy Court”). The Debtors continues to operate their businesses and manage their properties as debtors in possession pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. Additionally, on March 19, 2014, the United States Trustee for Region 3, serving the District of New Jersey, appointed an official committee of unsecured creditors pursuant to section 1102(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution #20-9
    BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle
    Howard Research and Development Corporation Downtown Columbia Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle Feasibility Study: Part 1 - Downtown Transit Center & Downtown Circulator Shuttle (Part of CEPPA #5) DRAFTDecember 2011 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. iv Chapter 1. Downtown Columbia Transit Center ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Downtown Columbia Circulator Shuttle ............................................................................................... 12 Appendix A. Regional Transit System Evaluation .............................................................................................. 21 Appendix B. Regional Transit Market Analysis .................................................................................................. 46 Appendix C. Transit Circulator Design ................................................................................................................ 64 Appendix D. Transit Center Site Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 764 Appendix E. Transit Development Plan ............................................................................................................... 79 DRAFT Page i• Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. Table of Figures Figure 1 Existing
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia ' Shistoricrichmondregi On
    VIRGINIA'S HISTORIC RICHMOND REGION GROUPplanner TOUR 1_cover_17gtm.indd 1 10/3/16 9:59 AM Virginia’s Beer Authority and more... CapitalAleHouse.com RichMag_TourGuide_2016.indd 1 10/20/16 9:05 AM VIRGINIA'S HISTORIC RICHMOND REGION GROUP TOURplanner p The Virginia Museum of Fine Arts’ permanent collection consists of more than 35,000 works of art. © Richmond Region 2017 Group Tour Planner. This pub- How to use this planner: lication may not be reproduced Table of Contents in whole or part in any form or This guide offers both inspira- by any means without written tion and information to help permission from the publisher. you plan your Group Tour to Publisher is not responsible for Welcome . 2 errors or omissions. The list- the Richmond region. After ings and advertisements in this Getting Here . 3 learning the basics in our publication do not imply any opening sections, gather ideas endorsement by the publisher or Richmond Region Tourism. Tour Planning . 3 from our listings of events, Printed in Richmond, Va., by sample itineraries, attractions Cadmus Communications, a and more. And before you Cenveo company. Published Out-of-the-Ordinary . 4 for Richmond Region Tourism visit, let us know! by Target Communications Inc. Calendar of Events . 8 Icons you may see ... Art Director - Sarah Lockwood Editor Sample Itineraries. 12 - Nicole Cohen G = Group Pricing Available Cover Photo - Jesse Peters Special Thanks = Student Friendly, Student Programs - Segway of Attractions & Entertainment . 20 Richmond ; = Handicapped Accessible To request information about Attractions Map . 38 I = Interactive Programs advertising, or for any ques- tions or comments, please M = Motorcoach Parking contact Richard Malkman, Shopping .
    [Show full text]
  • Civic Associations
    Civic Associations A AVE AZALE W C H S A E B M P O M R B RIV L O I E D N O R H A B R K L E R E K AV R O D RO A B ST WE Y R R O Y N M O A O N N E I A V K W T W E 5 D E A P A 9 E A R G O L I V V O E R T I A E A S 6 5 T FOR E R D 4 9 E O D P I P A I R A T 6 O T 5 D 4 P E 9 R S I E AVE O BELLEVU N BELLEVUE WASHINGTON PARK A V E HERMITAGE ROAD HISTORIC DISTRICT ASSOCIATION K E N P S A 5 REMONT AVE AVE IN T 9 CLA G T T N 1 I R N S E OU T REYC O I 5 G H T 9 O U O R 9 R A S P 5 B N A N O 1 T R I L H O R A N T V E A V I E E A V RNUM AVE V A W LABU V I E R V A E E T RNUM AV 1 E W LABU C A V S VD V 9 BL H O RIC E HEN E E L 5 A V L GINTER PARK I ROSEDALE T A P H W K W R A Y SEDDON ROAD IC WESTHAMPTON CITIZENS ASSOCIATION M R B A I R B A R V A AVE NORTH CENTRAL CIVIC ASSOCIATION T Y M PALMYR PA R D O R O D F A H N A O O THREE CHOPT ROAD CIVIC ASSOCIATION R D VE A S O R OAKDALE A T A R WESTWOOD CIVIC LEAGUE D S E N O A T D PROVIDENCE PARK E V I V E S E 6 A S G 4 D E E A WESTVIEW CIVIC ASSOCIATION A N R O N D L AW I L L V A E F HIGHLAND PARK PLAZA CIVIC ASSOCIATION O E S F L C O MONUMENT AVENUE PARK ASSOCIATION I P E M R R O L I A L LT SHERWOOD PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION G NOR O O V THS C N IDE K E I AV 6 E S S CLUB VIEW ASSOCIATION GLENBURNIE CIVIC ASSOCIATION 4 T L D RO GINTER PARK TERRACE CIVIC ASSOCIATION T B P R IN H SAUER'S GARDENS CIVIC ASSOCIATION A OO HIGHLAND VIEW H R V D D North Barton Heights A IV E ROA T E WESTHAMPTON PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION L U R R U O 5 W ES AD 9 O SHERWOOD AVE SEX ST HAMPTON GARDENS ASSOCIATION 1 B SHOCKOE HILL CIVIC ASSOCIATION
    [Show full text]
  • Download Guidebook to Richmond
    SIA RVA SOCIETY FOR INDUSTRIAL ARCHEOLOGY 47th ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAY 31 - JUNE 3, 2018 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA GUIDEBOOK TO RICHMOND SIA RVA SOCIETY FOR INDUSTRIAL ARCHEOLOGY 47th ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAY 31 - JUNE 3, 2018 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA OMNI RICHMOND HOTEL GUIDEBOOK TO RICHMOND SOCIETY FOR INDUSTRIAL ARCHEOLOGY MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 1400 TOWNSEND DRIVE HOUGHTON, MI 49931-1295 www.sia-web.org i GUIDEBOOK EDITORS Christopher H. Marston Nathan Vernon Madison LAYOUT Daniel Schneider COVER IMAGE Philip Morris Leaf Storage Ware house on Richmond’s Tobacco Row. HABS VA-849-31 Edward F. Heite, photog rapher, 1969. ii CONTENTS Acknowledgements ..................................................................................iv INTRODUCTION Richmond’s Industrial Heritage .............................................................. 3 THURSDAY, MAY 31, 2018 T1 - The University of Virginia ................................................................19 T1 - The Blue Ridge Tunnel ....................................................................22 T2 - Richmond Waterfront Walking Tour ..............................................24 T3 - The Library of Virginia .....................................................................26 FRIDAY, JUNE 1, 2018 F1 - Strickland Machine Company ........................................................27 F1 - O.K. Foundry .....................................................................................29 F1 & F2 - Tobacco Row / Philip Morris USA .......................................32 F1 &
    [Show full text]
  • D2JA3%7 Signa6re of Certifying Official Virainia ~Epartmentof Historic Resources State Or Federal Agency Or Tribal Government
    NPS Form 10900 OMB No. 10240018 (Rev. Aug. 2002) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting deteminations for individual properties and districts.See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form(Nationa1Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "xu in the appropriate box or by entering thmionation requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "NIA for "not applicable.Por functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instrutions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. ...................................................................................... ...............................................................................................................................................................................1. Name of Property historic name Forest Hill Historic District ..............................................................................................................................................................................other nameslsite number DHR File No. 127-6069 ...................................................................................................................................................................2.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Bon Air Special Area Plan Detailed Unedited Citizen Comments Compiled from Community Meetings, Emails and Internet Form April/May 2015
    Draft Bon Air Special Area Plan Detailed Unedited Citizen Comments Compiled from community meetings, emails and internet form April/May 2015 Comment Response Raw Comment # # Unfortunately, I do not see much in this plan to address the traffic problems that exist along Buford Rd. For cars turning onto/off of Buford, the traffic can be horrendous. Particularly bad is the intersection of Rockaway & Buford but there are other problem spots as well. 1 There is nothing here to address that concern. I would have hoped to see possibly some talk 3 of adding traffic lights or turning some intersections into 4 way stops. Perhaps even banning left turns at certain intersections at certain times of day. In my mind, traffic is one of the biggest issues in this area. On the topic of sidewalks... I know it is a hot button issue. I was initially a huge supporter because it sounds like a great idea. Then I heard the amount of land it takes, and my 2 4, 17 goodness, it changed my mind. Can the trees that would have to be removed be flagged or marked in some way, so as people consider the issue they can SEE the impact? Thank you. As someone who owns property on Bannon Rd., I am not too pleased with this plan. One thing being overlooked is that there is a need for smaller one level single family residence. 3 5 Surely, someone could have developed a plan that did not destroy the established neighborhood that I reside in. I thought this plan was dedicated to preserving what we have.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconnaissance Survey of LGBTQ Architectural Resources in the City of Richmond
    Reconnaissance Survey of LGBTQ Architectural Resources in the City of Richmond By Yelyzaveta Shevchenko Prepared for the Virginia Department of Historic Resources LGBTQ Heritage Working Group November 2017 0 Table of Contents Introduction .....................................................................................................................................2 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................3 Historical Context ...........................................................................................................................5 Resource Analysis ............................................................................................................................7 Survey Findings ...............................................................................................................................9 Recommendations ..........................................................................................................................26 Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................27 Appendix A: VCRIS Survey Forms 1 Introduction This project seeks to expand public and state knowledge surrounding Richmond’s LGBTQ— lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer—history through the architectural survey of significant locations. Though the histories of various minority groups have frequently been overlooked,
    [Show full text]