DOCSLIB.ORG

Amphibian Life List Amphibia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amphibian Life List Amphibia United States of America South Africa AMPHIBIAN LIFE LIST Costa Rica Germany Canada Nambia AMPHIBIA Ohio US CA CR DE ZA NA OH Introduced Species 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 INTRODUCED SPECIES WORLD TOTAL 1 Native Species 92 6 18 4 2 1 36 NATIVE SPECIES WORLD TOTAL 119 US CA CR DE ZA NA OH ANURA MICROHYLIDAE Eastern Narrow-mouthed Toad Gastrophryne carolinensis US Great Plains Narrow-mouthed Toad Gastrophryne olivacea US SCAPHIOPODIDAE Eastern Spadefoot Scaphiopus holbrookii US OH Couch's Spadefoot Scaphiopus couchii US Mexican Spadefoot Spea multiplicata US Plains Spadefoot Spea bombifrons US BUFONIDAE Common Toad Bufo bufo DE American Toad Anaxyrus americanus US OH Western Toad Anaxyrus boreas US Great Plains Toad Anaxyrus cognatus US Fowler’s Toad Anaxyrus fowleri US OH Woodhouse’s Toad Anaxyrus woodhousii US Southern Toad Anaxyrus terrestris US Oak Toad Anaxyrus quercicus US Red-spotted Toad Anaxyrus punctatus US Gulf Coast Toad Incilius nebulifer US Yellow Toad Incilius luetkenii CR Mesoamerican Cane Toad Rhinella horribilis CR Guttural Toad Sclerophrys gutturalis ZA Western Olive Toad Sclerophrys poweri NA LEPTODACTYLIDAE Savage's Thin-toed Frog Leptodactylus savagei CR CRAUGASTORIDAE Fitzinger's Robber Frog Craugastor fitzingeri CR Limon Robber Frog Pristimantis cerasinus CR Rio San Juan Robber Frog Pristimantis ridens CR ELEUTHERODACTYLIDAE Rio Grande Chirping Frog Eleutherodactylus cystignathoides US Common Dink Frog Diasporus diastema CR HYLIDAE Red-eyed Treefrog Agalychnis callidryas CR Eastern Cricket Frog Acris crepitans US Blanchard's Cricket Frog Acris blanchardi US OH Southern Cricket Frog Acris gryllus US Mountain Chorus Frog Pseudacris brachyphona US OH Upland Chorus Frog Pseudacris feriarum US Western Chorus Frog Pseudacris triseriata US OH Boreal Chorus Frog Pseudacris maculata US Spring Peeper Pseudacris crucifer US CA OH Sierran Treefrog Pseudacris sierra US Barking Treefrog Hyla gratiosa US Green Treefrog Hyla cinerea US Squirrel Treefrog Hyla squirella US Pine Woods Treefrog Hyla femoralis US Bird-voiced Treefrog Hyla avivoca US Gray Treefrog Hyla versicolor US CA OH Cope’s Gray Treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis US OH Canyon Treefrog Hyla arenicolor US New Granada Cross-banded Treefrog Smilisca phaeota CR Veragua Cross-banded Treefrog Smilisca sordida CR Mexican Treefrog Smilisca baudinii CR Hourglass Treefrog Dendropsophus ebraccatus CR Small-headed Treefrog Dendropsophus microcephalus CR Common Milk Frog Trachycephalus venulosus CR CENTROLENIDAE Nicaragua Giant Glass Frog Espadarana prosoblepon CR DENDROBATIDAE Strawberry Poison Frog Oophaga pumilio CR PYXICEPHALIDAE Delalande's River Frog Amietia delalandii ZA RANIDAE Marsh Frog Pelophylax ridibundus DE Green Frog Lithobates clamitans US CA OH American Bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus US OH River Frog Lithobates heckscheri US Pig Frog Lithobates grylio US Mink Frog Lithobates septentrionalis CA Pickerel Frog Lithobates palustris US OH Northern Leopard Frog Lithobates pipiens US CA OH Southern Leopard Frog Lithobates sphenocephalus US Plains Leopard Frog Lithobates blairi US Rio Grande Leopard Frog Lithobates berlandieri US Chiricahua Leopard Frog Lithobates chiricahuensis US Forrer’s Grass Frog Lithobates forreri CR Wood Frog Lithobates sylvaticus US OH Brilliant Forest Frog Lithobates warszewitschii CR 44 5 18 2 2 1 14 Total FROGS 68 CAUDATA SIRENIDAE Lesser Siren Siren intermedia US CRYPTOBRANCHIDAE Hellbender Cryptobranchus alleganiensis US OH PLETHODONTIDAE California Slender Salamander Batrachoseps attenuatus US Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii US Apalachicola Dusky Salamander Desmognathus apalachicolae US Allegheny Mountain Dusky Salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus US OH Ocoee Salamander Desmognathus ocoee US Imitator Salamander Desmognathus imitator US Northern Dusky Salamander Desmognathus fuscus US OH Spotted Dusky Salamander Desmognathus conanti US Santeetlah Dusky Salamander Desmognathus santeetlah US Black Mountain Salamander Desmognathus welteri US Southern Dusky Salamander Desmognathus auriculatus US Seal Salamander Desmognathus monticola US Black-bellied Salamander Desmognathus quadramaculatus US Shovel-nosed Salamander Desmognathus marmoratus US Green Salamander Aneides aeneus US OH Arboreal Salamander Aneides lugubris US Eastern Red-backed Salamander Plethodon cinereus US OH Southern Red-backed Salamander Plethodon serratus US Northern Zigzag Salamander Plethodon dorsalis US Northern Ravine Salamander Plethodon electromorphus US OH Wehrle's Salamander Plethodon wehrlei US Northern Slimy Salamander Plethodon glutinosus US OH Southeastern Slimy Salamander Plethodon grobmani US Southern Appalachian Salamander Plethodon teyahalee US Red-cheeked Salamander Plethodon jordani US Four-toed Salamander Hemidactylium scutatum US OH Northern Two-lined Salamander Eurycea bislineata US OH Southern Two-lined Salamander Eurycea cirrigera US OH Blue-ridged Two-lined Salamander Eurycea wilderae US Cave Salamander Eurycea lucifuga US Three-lined Salamander Eurycea guttolineata US Long-tailed Salamander Eurycea longicauda US OH Spring Salamander Gyrinophilus porphyriticus US OH Mud Salamander Pseudotriton montanus US OH Red Salamander Pseudotriton ruber US OH PROTEIDAE Mudpuppy Necturus maculosus US OH SALAMANDRIDAE Eastern Newt Notophthalmus viridescens US OH California Newt Taricha torosa US Alpine Newt Ichthyosaura alpestris DE Fire Salamander Salamandra salamandra DE AMBYSTOMATIDAE Unisexual Ambystomatid Ambystoma sp. * * Spotted Salamander Ambystoma maculatum US OH Mole Salamander Ambystoma talpoideum US Marbled Salamander Ambystoma opacum US OH Jefferson Salamander Ambystoma jeffersonianum US OH Blue-spotted Salamander Ambystoma laterale CA Small-mouthed Salamander Ambystoma texanum US OH Streamside Salamander Ambystoma barbouri US OH Eastern Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum US OH Western Tiger Salamander Ambystoma mavortium US 48 1 0 2 0 0 22 Total SALAMANDERS 51 HYLIDAE Cuban Treefrog Osteopilus septentrionalis i.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conservation Planning for Amphibian Species with Complex Habitat Requirements: a Case Study Using Movements and Habitat Selection of the Wood Frog Rana Sylvatica
    Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 442–453, 2006 Copyright 2006 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Conservation Planning for Amphibian Species with Complex Habitat Requirements: A Case Study Using Movements and Habitat Selection of the Wood Frog Rana sylvatica 1,2,3 1,4 2,5 ROBERT F. BALDWIN, ARAM J. K. CALHOUN, AND PHILLIP G. DEMAYNADIER, 1Department of Plant, Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, USA 2Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, 650 State Street, Bangor, Maine 04401, USA ABSTRACT.—Conservation of fauna breeding in vernal pools is challenging given their complex life histories. Many species, including the widespread North American Wood Frog (Rana sylvatica), require both aquatic and terrestrial habitat, yet insufficient information exists about movements between these environments, nor fine-scale selection patterns within them. To inform conservation planning, we conducted a radio-telemetry study of seasonal patterns of Wood Frog movements and habitat selection in southern Maine. Forty-three frogs were tracked an average of 25.6 days each, April to November 2003. In early spring, Wood Frogs generally selected damp leaf litter retreats on the margins of breeding pools. Following breeding, frogs selected forested wetlands (9.3% of the landscape) over forested uplands (90.7% of the landscape) in 75.3% of radio locations (N 5 544). Postbreeding movements from breeding pools to nearby, closed-canopy, forested wetlands ranged from 102–340 m (median 169m, N 5 8) and included stopovers in upland forest floors ranging from one to 17 days (median two days, N 5 7).
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibians in Zootaxa: 20 Years Documenting the Global Diversity of Frogs, Salamanders, and Caecilians
    Zootaxa 4979 (1): 057–069 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Review ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4979.1.9 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:972DCE44-4345-42E8-A3BC-9B8FD7F61E88 Amphibians in Zootaxa: 20 years documenting the global diversity of frogs, salamanders, and caecilians MAURICIO RIVERA-CORREA1*+, DIEGO BALDO2*+, FLORENCIA VERA CANDIOTI3, VICTOR GOYANNES DILL ORRICO4, DAVID C. BLACKBURN5, SANTIAGO CASTROVIEJO-FISHER6, KIN ONN CHAN7, PRISCILLA GAMBALE8, DAVID J. GOWER9, EVAN S.H. QUAH10, JODI J. L. ROWLEY11, EVAN TWOMEY12 & MIGUEL VENCES13 1Grupo Herpetológico de Antioquia - GHA and Semillero de Investigación en Biodiversidad - BIO, Universidad de Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5033-5480 2Laboratorio de Genética Evolutiva, Instituto de Biología Subtropical (CONICET-UNaM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Químicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2382-0872 3Unidad Ejecutora Lillo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas - Fundación Miguel Lillo, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina [email protected]; http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6133-9951 4Laboratório de Herpetologia Tropical, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Rodovia Jorge Amado Km 16 45662-900 Ilhéus, Bahia, Brasil [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4560-4006 5Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Museum Road, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1810-9886 6Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Av.
    [Show full text]
  • A Herpetofaunal Survey of the Santee National Wildlife Refuge Submitted
    A Herpetofaunal Survey of the Santee National Wildlife Refuge Submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service October 5, 2012 Prepared by: Stephen H. Bennett Wade Kalinowsky South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Introduction The lack of baseline inventory data of herpetofauna on the Santee National Wildlife Refuge, in general and the Dingle Pond Unit specifically has proven problematic in trying to assess priority species of concern and direct overall management needs in this system. Dingle Pond is a Carolina Bay which potentially provides unique habitat for many priority reptiles and amphibians including the federally threatened flatwoods salamander, the state endangered gopher frog, state threatened dwarf siren and spotted turtle and several species of conservation concern including the tiger salamander, upland chorus frog (coastal plain populations only), northern cricket frog (coastal plain populations only), many-lined salamander, glossy crayfish snake and black swamp snake. The presence or abundance of these and other priority species in this large Carolina Bay is not known. This project will provide for funds for South Carolina DNR to conduct baseline surveys to census and assess the status of the herpetofauna in and adjacent to the Dingle Pond Carolina Bay. Surveys will involve a variety of sampling techniques including funnel traps, hoop traps, cover boards, netting and call count surveys to identify herpetofauna diversity and abundance. Herpetofauna are particularly vulnerable to habitat changes including climate change and human development activities. Many unique species are endemic to Carolina Bays, a priority habitat that has been greatly diminished across the coastal plain of South Carolina. These species can serve as indicator species of habitat quality and climate changes and baseline data is critical at both the local and regional level.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Patterns of Ranavirus Detections
    NOTE Global patterns of ranavirus detections Jesse L. Brunnera*, Deanna H. Olsonb, Matthew J. Grayc, Debra L. Millerd, and Amanda L.J. Duffuse aSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4236, USA; bUSDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR 97331-8550, USA; cDepartment of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN 37996-4563, USA; dCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN 37996-4563, USA; eDepartment of Natural Sciences, Gordon State College, Barnesville, GA 30204, USA *[email protected] Abstract Ranaviruses are emerging pathogens of poikilothermic vertebrates. In 2015 the Global Ranavirus Reporting System (GRRS) was established as a centralized, open access, online database for reports of the presence (and absence) of ranavirus around the globe. The GRRS has multiple data layers (e.g., location, date, host(s) species, and methods of detection) of use to those studying the epidemiol- ogy, ecology, and evolution of this group of viruses. Here we summarize the temporal, spatial, diag- nostic, and host-taxonomic patterns of ranavirus reports in the GRRS. The number, distribution, and host diversity of ranavirus reports have increased dramatically since the mid 1990s, presumably in response to increased interest in ranaviruses and the conservation of their hosts, and also the availability of molecular diagnostics. Yet there are clear geographic and taxonomic biases among the OPEN ACCESS reports. We encourage ranavirus researchers to add their studies to the portal because such collation can provide collaborative opportunities and unique insights to our developing knowledge of this For personal use only.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of the Amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and Annotated Species List, Distribution, and Conservation 1,2César L
    Mannophryne vulcano, Male carrying tadpoles. El Ávila (Parque Nacional Guairarepano), Distrito Federal. Photo: Jose Vieira. We want to dedicate this work to some outstanding individuals who encouraged us, directly or indirectly, and are no longer with us. They were colleagues and close friends, and their friendship will remain for years to come. César Molina Rodríguez (1960–2015) Erik Arrieta Márquez (1978–2008) Jose Ayarzagüena Sanz (1952–2011) Saúl Gutiérrez Eljuri (1960–2012) Juan Rivero (1923–2014) Luis Scott (1948–2011) Marco Natera Mumaw (1972–2010) Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 13(1) [Special Section]: 1–198 (e180). Catalogue of the amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and annotated species list, distribution, and conservation 1,2César L. Barrio-Amorós, 3,4Fernando J. M. Rojas-Runjaic, and 5J. Celsa Señaris 1Fundación AndígenA, Apartado Postal 210, Mérida, VENEZUELA 2Current address: Doc Frog Expeditions, Uvita de Osa, COSTA RICA 3Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural La Salle, Apartado Postal 1930, Caracas 1010-A, VENEZUELA 4Current address: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Río Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Av. Ipiranga 6681, Porto Alegre, RS 90619–900, BRAZIL 5Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Altos de Pipe, apartado 20632, Caracas 1020, VENEZUELA Abstract.—Presented is an annotated checklist of the amphibians of Venezuela, current as of December 2018. The last comprehensive list (Barrio-Amorós 2009c) included a total of 333 species, while the current catalogue lists 387 species (370 anurans, 10 caecilians, and seven salamanders), including 28 species not yet described or properly identified. Fifty species and four genera are added to the previous list, 25 species are deleted, and 47 experienced nomenclatural changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Red-Legged Frog Rana Aurora
    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Red-legged Frog Rana aurora in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2004 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2004. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Red-legged Frog Rana aurora in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 46 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous report: Waye, H. 1999. COSEWIC status report on the red-legged frog Rana aurora in Canada in COSEWIC assessment and status report on the red-legged frog Rana aurora in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-31 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Kristiina Ovaska and Lennart Sopuck for writing the status report on the Red-legged Frog Rana aurora. This report was prepared under contract with Environment Canada and was overseen and edited by David Green, the COSEWIC Amphibians and Reptiles Species Specialist Subcommittee Co-chair. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Ếgalement disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la situation de Grenouille à pattes rouges (Rana aurora) au Canada — Mise à jour.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Assessment for the Northern Leopard Frog (Rana Pipiens)
    SPECIES ASSESSMENT FOR THE NORTHERN LEOPARD FROG (RANA PIPIENS ) IN WYOMING prepared by 1 2 BRIAN E. SMITH AND DOUG KEINATH 1Department of Biology Black Hills State University1200 University Street Unit 9044, Spearfish, SD 5779 2 Zoology Program Manager, Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071; 307-766-3013; [email protected] prepared for United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Wyoming State Office Cheyenne, Wyoming January 2004 Smith and Keinath – Rana pipiens January 2004 Table of Contents SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 3 NATURAL HISTORY ........................................................................................................................... 5 Morphological Description ...................................................................................................... 5 Taxonomy and Distribution ..................................................................................................... 6 Taxonomy .......................................................................................................................................6 Distribution and Abundance............................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist and Distribution Maps of the Amphibians and Reptiles of South Dakota
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies Nebraska Academy of Sciences 2000 A Checklist and Distribution Maps of the Amphibians and Reptiles of South Dakota Royce E. Ballinger University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Justin W. Meeker University of Nebraska-Lincoln Marcus Thies University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas Part of the Life Sciences Commons Ballinger, Royce E.; Meeker, Justin W.; and Thies, Marcus, "A Checklist and Distribution Maps of the Amphibians and Reptiles of South Dakota" (2000). Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societies. 49. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tnas/49 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Academy of Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated Societiesy b an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 2000. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences, 26: 29-46 A CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION MAPS OF THE AMPmBIANS AND REPTILES OF SOUTH DAKOTA Royce E. Ballinger, Justin W. Meeker, and Marcus Thies School of Biological Sciences University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0118 rballinger1 @ unl.edu lent treatise on the distribution and ecology of the ABSTRACT turtles of the state in an unpublished dissertation. Fourteen species of amphibians and 30 species of reptiles Several other authors (Dunlap 1963, 1967, O'Roke 1926, are documented from South Dakota, based on the examina­ Peterson 1974, Smith 1963a, 1963b, 1966, Underhill tion of 7,361 museum specimen records.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition to List the Relict Leopard Frog (Rana Onca) As an Endangered Species Under the Endangered Species Act
    BEFORE THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR PETITION TO LIST THE RELICT LEOPARD FROG (RANA ONCA) AS AN ENDANGERED SPECIES UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE PETITIONERS May 8, 2002 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The relict leopard frog (Rana onca) has the dubious distinction of being one of the first North American amphibians thought to have become extinct. Although known to have inhabited at least 64 separate locations, the last historical collections of the species were in the 1950s and this frog was only recently rediscovered at 8 (of the original 64) locations in the early 1990s. This extremely endangered amphibian is now restricted to only 6 localities (a 91% reduction from the original 64 locations) in two disjunct areas within the Lake Mead National Recreation Area in Nevada. The relict leopard frog historically occurred in springs, seeps, and wetlands within the Virgin, Muddy, and Colorado River drainages, in Utah, Nevada, and Arizona. The Vegas Valley leopard frog, which once inhabited springs in the Las Vegas, Nevada area (and is probably now extinct), may eventually prove to be synonymous with R. onca. Relict leopard frogs were recently discovered in eight springs in the early 1990s near Lake Mead and along the Virgin River. The species has subsequently disappeared from two of these localities. Only about 500 to 1,000 adult frogs remain in the population and none of the extant locations are secure from anthropomorphic events, thus putting the species at an almost guaranteed risk of extinction. The relict leopard frog has likely been extirpated from Utah, Arizona, and from the Muddy River drainage in Nevada, and persists in only 9% of its known historical range.
    [Show full text]
  • Other Contributions
    Other Contributions NATURE NOTES Amphibia: Anura Family Bufonidae Incilius marmoreus (Wiegmann, 1833). Reproduction. The distribution of the Marbled Toad, Incilius marmo- reus, a Mexican endemic, extends from northern Sinaloa to Chiapas along the Pacific coastal plain, with an isolated population in Veracruz (Frost, 2017); on the Atlantic versant, Lemos Espinal and Dixon (2016: 354) also noted that this species occurs from “northern Hidalgo to the Isthmus of Tehuantepec.” Hardy and McDiarmid (1969) reported that most individuals in Sinaloa were found on the road at night during or just after rains, and that most females were collected in July and contained eggs. In Hidalgo, I. marmoreus aggregates in temporary ponds during the rainy season (Lemos Espinal and Dixon, 2016). Herein, I present data from a histological examination of I. marmoreus gonadal material from Colima and Sinaloa, and provide the minimum sizes for reproductive activity in males and females. The use of museum collections for obtaining reproductive data avoids removing additional animals from the wild. I examined 42 specimens of I. marmoreus (11 from Colima, collected in 1967, and 31 from Sinaloa, collected in 1960, 1962, 1963, and 1968). The combined samples consisted of 17 males (mean snout–vent length [SVL] = 54.5 mm ± 3.1 SD, range = 48–58 mm), 21 females (mean SVL = 60.9 mm ± 4.5 SD, range = 54–70 mm) and four juveniles from Sinaloa (mean SVL = 38.4 mm ± 7.1 SD, range = 29–44 mm); the specimens are maintained in the herpetology collection of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM), Los Angeles, California, United States (Appendix 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Habitat Plan
    WILDLIFE HABITAT PLAN City of Novi, Michigan A QUALITY OF LIFE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY WILDLIFE HABITAT PLAN City of Novi, Michigan A QUALIlY OF LIFE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY JUNE 1993 Prepared By: Wildlife Management Services Brandon M. Rogers and Associates, P.C. JCK & Associates, Inc. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS City Council Matthew C. Ouinn, Mayor Hugh C. Crawford, Mayor ProTem Nancy C. Cassis Carol A. Mason Tim Pope Robert D. Schmid Joseph G. Toth Planning Commission Kathleen S. McLallen, * Chairman John P. Balagna, Vice Chairman lodia Richards, Secretary Richard J. Clark Glen Bonaventura Laura J. lorenzo* Robert Mitzel* Timothy Gilberg Robert Taub City Manager Edward F. Kriewall Director of Planning and Community Development James R. Wahl Planning Consultant Team Wildlife Management Services - 640 Starkweather Plymouth, MI. 48170 Kevin Clark, Urban Wildlife Specialist Adrienne Kral, Wildlife Biologist Ashley long, Field Research Assistant Brandon M. Rogers and Associates, P.C. - 20490 Harper Ave. Harper Woods, MI. 48225 Unda C. lemke, RlA, ASLA JCK & Associates, Inc. - 45650 Grand River Ave. Novi, MI. 48374 Susan Tepatti, Water Resources Specialist * Participated with the Planning Consultant Team in developing the study. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii PREFACE vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY viii FRAGMENTATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES " ., , 1 Consequences ............................................ .. 1 Effects Of Forest Fragmentation 2 Edges 2 Reduction of habitat 2 SPECIES SAMPLING TECHNIQUES ................................ .. 3 Methodology 3 Survey Targets ............................................ ., 6 Ranking System ., , 7 Core Reserves . .. 7 Wildlife Movement Corridor .............................. .. 9 FIELD SURVEY RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS , 9 Analysis Results ................................ .. 9 Core Reserves . .. 9 Findings and Recommendations , 9 WALLED LAKE CORE RESERVE - DETAILED STUDy.... .. .... .. .... .. 19 Results and Recommendations ............................... .. 21 GUIDELINES TO ECOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE PLANNING AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Abnormalities in Anurans from Central Mexico: a Case Study (Anura: Ranidae, Hylidae)
    heRPetoZoa 27 (3/4): 115 - 121 115 Wien, 30. Jänner 2015 Morphological abnormalities in anurans from central Mexico: a case study (anura: Ranidae, hylidae) Morphologische anomalien bei anuren aus dem mittleren Mexiko: ein Fallbericht (anura: Ranidae, hylidae) oCtavIo MonRoy -v IlChIs & l ouRDes lIZZoulI PaRRa -l óPeZ & t RInIDaD BeltRán -l eón & J oRge a. l ugo & á ngel BalDeRas & M aRtha M. Z aRCo -g onZáleZ KuRZFassung hohe Raten an morphologischen anomalien (Mißbildungen) werden bei amphibien auf die einwirkung von Parasiten, chemischen substanzen, uv-strahlung und Beutegreifern zurückgeführt. Ziele der vorliegenden untersuchung waren die quantitative und qualitative erfassung grobmorphologischer äußerer Mißbildungen an anuren des sierra nanchititla naturreservats (Mexiko) sowie die Identifizierung möglicher ursachen. sechs (6.23 %) der 95 gefangenen Individuen von Lithobates forreri (BoulengeR , 1883) sowie je ein „Beifangexemplar“ von Lithobates zweifeli (h IllIs , F Rost & W eBB , 1984) und Hyla arenicolor CoPe , 1866 zeigten insgesamt acht typen morphologischer Mißbildungen . Die beobachtete Mißbildungsrate lag somit geringfügig über dem mit fünf Prozent angenommenen hintergrundwert einer Population. an Makroparasiten wurden nematoda (Ozwaldocruzi a sp. und Rhabdias savagei ) und trematoda ( Haematoloechus sp. und Gorgoderina tarascae ) an inneren organen sowie Milben der gattung Hannemania auf der Körperoberfläche festgestellt. In den Muskel - gewebsproben, waren die Metalle Blei (Pb) und Kupfer (Cu) nicht nachweis- oder quantifzierbar, während Zink (Zn) in niedrigen (physiologischen) Konzentrationen vorlag. In den Wasserproben wurde Pb nicht nachgewiesen, die Zn and Cu Konzentrationen lagen innerhalb der in Mexiko zulässigen grenzwerte für Fließgewässer. Die autoren schließen als ursache der beobachteten, erhöhten Mißbildungsrate aus: (1) die tätigkeit von Makroparasiten, auf - grund des Fehlens von trematoda der gattung Riberoia , von denen man weiß, das sie Mißbildungen verursachen können und (2) die einwirkung von Pb, Cu and Zn.
    [Show full text]