The Effects of Rail Rate Increases on Iowa Grain Shippers and Transportation Modes Thomas Alan Narigon Iowa State University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Effects of Rail Rate Increases on Iowa Grain Shippers and Transportation Modes Thomas Alan Narigon Iowa State University Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1980 The effects of rail rate increases on Iowa grain shippers and transportation modes Thomas Alan Narigon Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Agricultural and Resource Economics Commons, Agricultural Economics Commons, and the Economics Commons Recommended Citation Narigon, Thomas Alan, "The effects of rail rate increases on Iowa grain shippers and transportation modes" (1980). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 17034. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/17034 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ~ ' The effects c f rail rate inc reases on I owa grain snippers and t ransportatio n mcaes ) ? . ' by .!Vlt.7 c. :.i Tho mas Alan Narigon A Thesis Submitted t o the Graduate Fac ul~y i n Partial Fulfil l me n t of the P.equireme~ts f o r ~r.e De gree of ~1...?i.S '!' ER OF S CIENCE Department : Economi cs Major : Ag ricultu r al Economi c s Signatures have been redacted for privacy Iowa State Cniversity P.me s, I o v.'a 19ao 1 315468 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I . INTRODUCTION l Objectives 4 CHAPTER II . METHODS OF ANALYSI S 5 The Study Areas 5 The Model 9 Constraints 14 CHAPTER III. THE DATA 17 The Supply of Grain 17 The Basis 19 Grain Transportation Rates an d Estimated Costs 29 Truck Rate Estimates 37 Rail Rates 37 Est imate~ G1ain Handling and Storage Investment Costs 39 CHAPTER IV. RESULTS 41 Method of Presentation 42 Eastern District Re sults 47 S~mrn a ry of the Eastern District 63 Western District Results 66 Summary of the We$tern District 81 CHAPTER V . SU!-W'J>.RY At~D CONCLU SIONS 85 Conclusions 8 6 Suggestions for rurther Research 89 iii Page BIBLIOGRAPHY 91 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 93 i v LIST OF MAPS Page Map 1 . Locations of the study areas and final ma rkets 7 Map 2. The eastern district 8 Map 3. The western district 10 v LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. Estimated storage , receiving , load-out , and drying capacity of elevators in the study areas in 1977-1978 18 Table 2 . Estimated beginning and e nding st~cks, recei pts, and shipments of corn and s oy- beans by e l evators in t he western district in 1977- 1978 by quarter in thousands of bushels 20 Table 3 . Estimated beginning and ending stocks , receipts, and shipments of corn and soy- beans by elevators in the eastern district in 1977-1978 by quarter in thous ands of bushe ls 21 Table 4 . Flows of soybeans from the eastern district to findl markets in thousands o= bushels duri ~g the 1977- 1978 marketing year a s repor ted in the elevator survey 22 Table 5. Flows of corn from the eastern district to final markets in thousands of bushels during the 1977- 1978 marketing year a s reported in the e lei.-a tor survey 2 3 Table 6 . Flows of corn from the weste~n Qistrict to final markets in thousands of bu3hels during the 1977- l978 marketing year ~ s repor ted i n the elev a tor survey 2 4 Table 7 . Flows of soybeans from the wes~ern district to final markets in thousand s o f bushels dur ing the 1977- 1978 marketing year as reported in the e l evator survey 25 Table Ba . Esti~ated averaga delivered corn basis at selec t ed markets in dollars per bushel by quarter and mode of delivery, September 1977 to August 1978 27 vi Page Table 8b . Estimated delivered soybean basis a t sele cted markets in doll ars per bushel by quarter and mode of delivery, September 1977 t o August 1978 28 Table 9 . Speed- d istance r e l a tio n s hip for grain transportation by types of v ehi~les in miles per hour 34 Table 10 . Estiffiated costs of hauling grain in tractor-trailer and tandem t rucks by trip distance and s peed in late- 1977 36 Table 11. Railroad rates for transportiDg corn and s oybeans from select ed Iowa o rig ins to s elected mar kets by size of shipment in cents per hund r edweight a t Ex Parte 349 rate levels , eastern and western distric t s 38 Table 12 . Estimated variable cost of receiving and loadi~g out grain at country elevators and subterwinals in cents per bushel , 1974 and 1978 40 Table 1 3 . Estimated variable costs for storing corn and soybeans into the fol lowing q uarter d uring the 1977-1978 crop year , in do llars per hundredweight, a t elevators and by study area 40 Table 14 . Estimated value of the o b jective f unction for five comput e r solutions , eastern district , in dollars 47 Table 15. Esti.mated corn and soybean shipments in bushels by mode from the eastern d iscrict by computer solution 49 Table 16. Estimated c hange in the cost cf marketing corn and s oybeans over the base solution, eastern district , i n cents per bushel by type and size of shipper 51 Table 17. Estima~ed ch a nge in the cost o f ma rketing corn and soybea ns over the b2s c solution in cents per bushel , eastern d~_s trict , by amount elevators shipped by rail in 1977- 1978 mark~ting year 53 vii Page Table 18 . Estimated change in the cost o f marketing corn and s oybeans over the base solution in cents per b ushel, eastern district by predominant d istance elevators shipped in the 1977- 1978 marketing year 53 Table 19 . Estimated rail and truck revenues from corn and s oybean shipments, eastern district, by c omputer s olution 55 Table 20 . Esti~ated thousands of ton- miles of corn and s oybean shipments by rail and truck , eastern distric t, by computer solution 55 Table 21 . Estimated thousands of rail ton- miles by maximum size of elevator rail loading capacity , eastern district , by computer solution 57 Table 22 . Estimated thousands of rail ton- miles by percent of corn and soybeans e l evators shipped by r ail in the 1977-1978 marketing year, eastern district by computer solution 58 Tabl e 23. Estimated thousands of rail ton- miles by d istance e l evators shipped corn and soybeans , eastern district , by computer solution 59 Table 24 . Eastern d istrict quarterly ~o tal s for corn in thousands of bushels by compu te~ solution 61 Table 25 . Eastern district quarterly totals for soy- b eans in tho usands of bushels by computer soluti on 64 Table 26. Estima ted value of the objecti ve function for five c omputer s olutions , western district , in dollars 67 Table 27 . Estimated corn and s oybean shipme nts by mode from the western district by computer solution 68 Table 28 . Estimated change in t he cost cf marketing corn and s oybeans o ver the base s olution, western district , in cents per bushel , by s ize of shippe r 69 viii Page Table 29 . Estimatec change in the cost of marketing corn and soybeans over the ba2e solution in cents per bushel, western district , by amount elevators shipped by rail in ~ he 1977- 1978 marketing year 7 0 Table 30 . Estimated change in the cost of marketing corn and s oybeans over the base s olution in cents per bushel, western district by pre- dominant distance e l evators shipped in the 1977- 1978 marketing year 71 Table 31 . Estimated rail a nd truck revenues from corn and s oybean shipments , western d istrict , by computer solution 73 Table 32 . Esti mated thousands of ton - ~iles of corn and soybean shipments by rail and trnck , western district , by computer solution 74 Table 33 . Esti mated thousands of raii ton- miles by maximum size of elevator rai l l oading capacity , western district , by computer solution 76 Table 34. Estimated thousands of rail ton- miles by per cent of corn and soybeans elev~tors shipped by rail in the 1977- 1978 ma rekting year, western cistrict by computer solution 77 Table 35 . Estimated thousands of rail ton - ~i les by dis tance elevators shipped corn a nd soybeans , western d i strict, by computer s olution 77 Tabl e 36. We s tern district quarterly totals for corn i n thousands of bushels by computer s o l ution 79 Ta ble 37. Western district quarterly totals for s oy- beans in thousands of bushels by computer solution 82 1 CHAP~ER ! . INTRODUCTI ON The farmers i n Iowa typically p roduce a large surpl u s of corn and soybeans that must be transported to p r ocessors and export markets . In 1979 , railroads hauled 53 percent of all g rain moved to ma r kets in the U.S., and 51 percen~ of all grain destined to export markets (2) . As the demand for U. S. g rain grows worldwide, and new markets develop nationally , the rail- roads will continue to play a major part in the transportation of grain . However, the average return on investment of all Class I railroads in 1978 averaged only 1. 6 percent (3) .
Recommended publications
  • American and BRITISH UNITS of Measurement to SI UNITS
    AMERICAN AND BRITISH UNITS OF MEASUREMENT TO SI UNITS UNIT & ABBREVIATION SI UNITS CONVERSION* UNIT & ABBREVIATION SI UNITS CONVERSION* UNITS OF LENGTH UNITS OF MASS 1 inch = 40 lines in 2.54 cm 0.393701 1 grain gr 64.7989 mg 0.0154324 1 mil 25.4 µm 0.03937 1 dram dr 1.77185 g 0.564383 1 line 0.635 mm 1.57480 1 ounce = 16 drams oz 28.3495 g 0.0352739 1 foot = 12 in = 3 hands ft 30.48 cm 0.0328084 1 pound = 16 oz lb 0.453592 kg 2.204622 1 yard = 3 feet = 4 spans yd 0.9144 m 1.09361 1 quarter = 28 lb 12.7006 kg 0.078737 1 fathom = 2 yd fath 1.8288 m 0.546807 1 hundredweight = 112 lb cwt 50.8024 kg 0.0196841 1 rod (perch, pole) rd 5.0292 m 0.198839 1 long hundredweight l cwt 50.8024 kg 0.0196841 1 chain = 100 links ch 20.1168 m 0.0497097 1 short hundredweight sh cwt 45.3592 kg 0.0220462 1 furlong = 220 yd fur 0.201168 km 4.97097 1 ton = 1 long ton tn, l tn 1.016047 t 0.984206 1 mile (Land Mile) mi 1.60934 km 0.62137 1 short ton = 2000 lb sh tn 0.907185 t 1.102311 1 nautical mile (intl.) n mi, NM 1.852 km 0.539957 1 knot (Knoten) kn 1.852 km/h 0.539957 UNITS OF FORCE 1 pound-weight lb wt 4.448221 N 0.2248089 UNITS OF AREA 1 pound-force LB, lbf 4.448221 N 0.2248089 1 square inch sq in 6.4516 cm2 0.155000 1 poundal pdl 0.138255 N 7.23301 1 circular inch 5.0671 cm2 0.197352 1 kilogram-force kgf, kgp 9.80665 N 0.1019716 1 square foot = 144 sq in sq ft 929.03 cm2 1.0764 x 10-4 1 short ton-weight sh tn wt 8.896444 kN 0.1124045 1 square yard = 9 sq ft sq yd 0.83613 m2 1.19599 1 long ton-weight l tn wt 9.964015 kN 0.1003611 1 acre = 4 roods 4046.8
    [Show full text]
  • Units of Weight and Measure : Definitions and Tables of Equivalents
    Units of Weight and Measure (United States Customary and Metric) Definitions and Tables of Equivalents United States Department of Commerce National Bureau of Standards Miscellaneous Publication 233 THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS Functions and Activities The functions of the National Bureau of Standards are set forth in the Act of Congress, March 3, 1901, as amended by Congress in Public Law 619, 1950. These include the development and maintenance of the national standards of measurement and the provision of means and methods for making measurements consistent with these standards; the determination of physical constants and properties of materials; the development of methods and instruments for testing materials, devices, and structures; advisory services to government agencies on scientific and technical problems; invention and development of devices to serve special needs of the Government; and the development of standard practices, codes, and specifications. The work includes basic and applied research, development, engineering, instrumentation, testing, evaluation, calibration services, and various consultation and information services. Research projects are also performed for other government agencies when the work relates to and supplements the basic program of the Bureau or when the Bureau's unique competence is required. The scope of activities is suggested by the fisting of divisions and sections on the inside of the back cover. Publications The results of the Bureau's work take the form of either actual equipment and devices
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Units
    Imperial units From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search This article is about the post-1824 measures used in the British Empire and countries in the British sphere of influence. For the units used in England before 1824, see English units. For the system of weight, see Avoirdupois. For United States customary units, see Customary units . Imperial units or the imperial system is a system of units, first defined in the British Weights and Measures Act of 1824, later refined (until 1959) and reduced. The system came into official use across the British Empire. By the late 20th century most nations of the former empire had officially adopted the metric system as their main system of measurement. The former Weights and Measures office in Seven Sisters, London. Contents [hide] • 1 Relation to other systems • 2 Units ○ 2.1 Length ○ 2.2 Area ○ 2.3 Volume 2.3.1 British apothecaries ' volume measures ○ 2.4 Mass • 3 Current use of imperial units ○ 3.1 United Kingdom ○ 3.2 Canada ○ 3.3 Australia ○ 3.4 Republic of Ireland ○ 3.5 Other countries • 4 See also • 5 References • 6 External links [edit] Relation to other systems The imperial system is one of many systems of English or foot-pound-second units, so named because of the base units of length, mass and time. Although most of the units are defined in more than one system, some subsidiary units were used to a much greater extent, or for different purposes, in one area rather than the other. The distinctions between these systems are often not drawn precisely.
    [Show full text]
  • English Customary Weights and Measures
    English Customary Weights and Measures Distance In all traditional measuring systems, short distance units are based on the dimensions of the human body. The inch represents the width of a thumb; in fact, in many languages, the word for "inch" is also the word for "thumb." The foot (12 inches) was originally the length of a human foot, although it has evolved to be longer than most people's feet. The yard (3 feet) seems to have gotten its start in England as the name of a 3-foot measuring stick, but it is also understood to be the distance from the tip of the nose to the end of the middle finger of the outstretched hand. Finally, if you stretch your arms out to the sides as far as possible, your total "arm span," from one fingertip to the other, is a fathom (6 feet). Historically, there are many other "natural units" of the same kind, including the digit (the width of a finger, 0.75 inch), the nail (length of the last two joints of the middle finger, 3 digits or 2.25 inches), the palm (width of the palm, 3 inches), the hand (4 inches), the shaftment (width of the hand and outstretched thumb, 2 palms or 6 inches), the span (width of the outstretched hand, from the tip of the thumb to the tip of the little finger, 3 palms or 9 inches), and the cubit (length of the forearm, 18 inches). In Anglo-Saxon England (before the Norman conquest of 1066), short distances seem to have been measured in several ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C. General Tables of Units of Measurement
    Handbook 44 – 2016 Appendix C – General Tables of Units of Measurement Table of Contents Appendix C. General Tables of Units of Measurement ........................................................ C-3 1. Tables of Metric Units of Measurement ..................................................................................................... C-3 Units of Length ............................................................................................................................................... C-3 Units of Area .................................................................................................................................................. C-3 Units of Liquid Volume .................................................................................................................................. C-4 Units of Volume ............................................................................................................................................. C-4 Units of Mass .................................................................................................................................................. C-4 2. Tables of U.S. Customary Units of Measurement ..................................................................................... C-4 Units of Length ............................................................................................................................................... C-4 Units of Area .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Household Weights and Measures
    i t * W so so H| (ti- re 3 » B? § O ? M ^ hi B re vd to P hi EE d o 1 © 50 g w o re » o re «-• SO » a £ era p> a B o S3 o o B B o H- H-» 1— o o o VPO ft- <3> p o o o p p o o Ul K> o 00 Cm Cm o o o o o o H a4 o3 re o bd p. w *5o a- o " p. re a" so re gr B to o fl) a *p it* CO o a M aQ re Da P- •4^ eng ey- 0; o> XX > re i-i e-t- re CO X a* SO &&£' £' re X so P> 01 £' B B X II o re re re a H-* t— H-» 0o 0O NJ B re re re HI H| a P- to ~co o CM u 2. CfO. oo Oo co on CM o re so O o o O o CO hi x' a* a* o hi a. a i-i- r-t- r-f- a X p- X X p. o o o o P o" to CM (O CM i° ee tr am a* re_ "en o to In H-» **. $. oo co ~4 oo SO GO (TO.' do,' o O O © o <s O o 13- a* 1 a re r*" HI so oo. re Oo P* N> t~o Oo Co •<I O 00 •5 a o O a O o o 50 re cn Oo 0T Cm N> in Cm H- H-» Ol -J f— Oi ~1 J : DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF STANDARDS S.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois-Indiana Seed Conditioning Workshop What Is Behind the Calculations? Ron Reichert February 5, 2019
    Illinois-Indiana Seed Conditioning Workshop What is behind the calculations? Ron Reichert February 5, 2019 What is behind the calculations? ◼ Seed Treatment Rate Calculations • Application Rate – the amount of a formulated product needed to achieve the desired dose or amount of active ingredient applied to the seed. Always consult product label for application rates. In some cases the label will have an application rate range based on the level of pest control needed. Do not exceed the maximum label rate. Application rate may be expressed several different ways and can be specific to a dose per volume of seed, a dose per given weight of seed, or a dose per seed or specific number of seeds. 2 What is behind the calculations? • Application Goal Safe and Accurate Application of the Correct Dose and Even Distribution of the Active Ingredient(s) to the Seed. Rates typically expressed as: ● fl oz/cwt (ml/100kg) ● oz/cwt (gm/100kg) ● oz ai/cwt (gm ai/100kg) ● mg ai/Seed ● Fl oz/unit (typically calculated from mg ai/seed where a “unit” has been defined, i.e. 140,000 seed for soybean or 80,000 seed for corn) – It is very important to identify the number of seed per unit as not every seed company may use the exact same unit expression. 3 What is behind the calculations? ◼ Seed Treatment Application Calculations – mg ai per seed ● This rate is used for seed treatment products that are applied as a specific amount of active ingredient per seed basis. Example Product – ILeVO® A systemic seed treatment for use on Soybean for the protection against damage caused by early season plant pathogenic nematodes.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Made to Measure
    Made in Britain: Not made to measure. Ronnie Cohen © 2011 Ronnie Cohen. All rights reserved. 1 Table of Contents Foreword...............................................................................................................................................5 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................6 Central Role of Measurement in Daily Life.........................................................................................7 Why Measurement Matters..................................................................................................................8 Quest for Honest Measurements since Ancient Times.........................................................................9 Measurement Facts: Did you know that....?.......................................................................................10 Description of the British Imperial System........................................................................................11 Introduction to the British Imperial System..............................................................................11 Units of Length..........................................................................................................................11 Units of Area.............................................................................................................................11 Units of Volume........................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Checking the Net Contents of Packaged Goods
    Handbook 133 – 2020 Appendix E. General Tables of Units of Measurement Appendix E. General Tables of Units of Measurement These tables have been prepared for the benefit of those requiring tables of units for occasional ready reference. In Section 4. Tables of Units of Measurement of this Appendix, the tables are carried out to a large number of decimal places and exact values are indicated by underlining. In most of the other tables, only a limited number of decimal places are given, therefore making the tables better adapted to the average user. Section 1. Tables of Metric Units of Measurement In the metric system of measurement, designations of multiples and subdivisions of any unit may be arrived at by combining with the name of the unit the prefixes deka, hecto, and kilo meaning, respectively, 10, 100, and 1000, and deci, centi, and milli, meaning, respectively, one-tenth, one-hundredth, and one-thousandth. In some of the following metric tables, some such multiples and subdivisions have not been included for the reason that these have little, if any currency in actual usage. In certain cases, particularly in scientific usage, it becomes convenient to provide for multiples larger than 1000 and for subdivisions smaller than one-thousandth. Accordingly, the following prefixes have been introduced and these are now generally recognized: yotta, (Y) meaning 1024 deci, (d), meaning 10-1 zetta, (Z), meaning 1021 centi, (c), meaning 10-2 exa, (E), meaning 1018 milli, (m), meaning 10-3 peta, (P), meaning 1015 micro, (µ), meaning 10-6 tera, (T), meaning 1012 nano, (n), meaning 10-9 giga, (G), meaning 109 pico, (p), meaning 10-12 mega, (M), meaning 106 femto, (f), meaning 10-15 kilo, (k), meaning 103 atto, (a), meaning 10-18 hecto, (h), meaning 102 zepto, (z), meaning 10-21 deka, (da), meaning 101 yocto, (y), meaning 10-24 Thus a kilometer is 1000 meters and a millimeter is 0.001 meter.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITS of WEIGHT and MEASURE International (Metric) and U.S
    I \ ___^am UNITS OF WEIGHT AND MEASURE International (Metric) and U.S. Customary Definitions and Tables of Equivalents ivit I crv¥Hi\u M I I I Arm 'K^ he I I ^Nfck. r a law I I mmm I m mmJr \mw I mum lARE-ACRt STANDARDS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE / NATIONAL BUREAU OF Miscellaneous Publication 286 : THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS The National Bureau of Standards 1 provides measurement and technical information services essential to the efficiency and effectiveness of the work of the Nation's scientists and engineers. The Bureau serves also as a focal point in the Federal Government for assur- ing maximum application of the physical and engineering sciences to the advancement of technology in industry and commerce. To accomplish this mission, the Bureau is organized into three institutes covering broad program areas of research and services: THE INSTITUTE FOR BASIC STANDARDS . provides the central basis within the United States for a complete and consistent system of physical measurements, coor- dinates that system with the measurement systems of other nations, and furnishes essential services leading to accurate and uniform physical measurements throughout the Nation's scientific community, industry, and commerce. This Institute comprises a series of divisions, each serving a classical subject matter area: —Applied Mathematics—Electricity—Metrology—Mechanics—Heat—Atomic Phys- ics—Physical Chemistry—Radiation Physics—Laboratory Astrophysics 2—Radio Standards Laboratory, 2 which includes Radio Standards Physics and Radio Standards Engineering—Office of Standard Reference Data. THE INSTITUTE FOR MATERIALS RESEARCH . conducts materials research and provides associated materials services including mainly reference materials and data on the properties of materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrication Is SUCCESSFUL
    Metrication is SUCCESSFUL Metrication is SUCCESSFUL because it is: Simple The modern metric system, formally known as the International System of Units (SI), is the simplest and easiest-to-use system of measurement ever devised. In fact the metric system is the only system of measurement ever devised. All previous measuring methods were just a hodge-podge of randomly generated local measures. Unique The metric system is unique. Never before, has there been a method of measurement that has all the positive benefits as SI. Coherent The metric system uses the same decimal nature as our number system, and it uses the same mathematical rules and symbols that we use for the mathematic of numbers Capable The metric system is capable of measuring anything in any trade, profession, or other human activity. The metric system has no limitations. For example, you might measure the distance from here to the door in metres, the distance from between your home and your work in kilometres, the width of your little finger nail in millimetres, the diameter of the hairs on your head in micrometres, and the size of one of your cells in nanometres. Why stop there? With the SI prefixes, there is more than enough flexibility to measure from the size of sub-atomic particles – the diameter of an electron is about 6 femtometres – to the size of the whole Universe – the diameter of the Universe, as observed by the world's best telescopes, is about 250 yottametres. Equitable The key argument for using the metric system is that it is fair to all concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • TABLE 1-4 Conversion Factors: U.S
    TABLE 1-4 Conversion Factors: U.S. Customary and Commonly Used Units to SI Units Conversion factor; multiply Customary or commonly Alternate customary unit by factor to Quantity used unit SI unit SI unit obtain SI unit Space,† time Length naut mi km 1.852* E + 00 mi km 1.609 344* E + 00 chain m 2.011 68* E + 01 link m 2.011 68* E − 01 fathom m 1.828 8* E + 00 yd m 9.144* E − 01 ft m 3.048* E − 01 cm 3.048* E + 01 in mm 2.54* E + 01 in cm 2.54 E + 00 mil µm 2.54* E + 01 Length/length ft/mi m/km 1.893 939 E − 01 Length/volume ft/U.S. gal m/m 3 8.051 964 E + 01 ft/ft 3 m/m 3 1.076 391 E + 01 ft/bbl m/m 3 1.917 134 E + 00 Area mi 2 km 2 2.589 988 E + 00 section ha 2.589 988 E + 02 acre ha 4.046 856 E − 01 ha m 2 1.000 000* E + 04 yd 2 m2 8.361 274 E − 01 ft 2 m2 9.290 304* E − 02 in 2 mm 2 6.451 6* E + 02 cm 2 6.451 6* E + 00 Area/volume ft 2/in 3 m2/cm 3 5.699 291 E − 03 ft 2/ft 3 m2/m 3 3.280 840 E + 00 Volume cubem km 3 4.168 182 E + 00 acre ⋅ft m 3 1.233 482 E + 03 ha ⋅m 1.233 482 E − 01 yd 3 m3 7.645 549 E − 01 bbl (42 U.S.
    [Show full text]