DOCSLIB.ORG

THE PHONOLOGY of SONORANTS in BAVARIAN GERMAN Erin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE PHONOLOGY of SONORANTS in BAVARIAN GERMAN Erin THE PHONOLOGY OF SONORANTS IN BAVARIAN GERMAN Erin Noelliste Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Germanic Studies, Indiana University April 2017 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Doctoral Committee ______________________________________ Tracy Alan Hall, Ph.D. (chair) ______________________________________ Kari Gade, Ph.D. ______________________________________ Kenneth de Jong, Ph.D. ______________________________________ Susanne Even, Ph.D. March 2, 2017 ii To RN, June 2016 iii Acknowledgements First and foremost, thank you Tracy Hall for your never-ending wealth of knowledge and ideas of how to improve my writing. You introduced me to Germanic linguistics and have patiently taught me how to write academically over the last decade. For all of the ways you have shaped me as a scholar, I will forever be grateful. Special thanks go to Kari Gade, who is the top advocate for graduate students I have ever met. She has been ever supportive and encouraging throughout my graduate career, and I most definitely could not have completed this degree without her. Thanks also to Susanne Even for serving on this committee and teaching me so many lessons. From guidance in teaching to inclusion in collaborative workshop leading, Susanne has enhanced my educational and professional development in many ways. Thank you, Ken de Jong, for your phenomenal explanations of the field of phonetics which equipped me with the skills to collect and analyze these data. I also thank Dan Dinnsen for his vast teachings in theoretical linguistics and for his confidence in my academic pursuits. Thank you, Gergana May, for your encouragement to study abroad in Norway – an experience which developed me in so many ways in and outside of the classroom. A huge thank you goes to Jill Giffin, who always answers my many questions patiently and faithfully; the department could not run without you! For funding my research and writing, I thank the Department of Germanic Studies and the College of Arts and Sciences at Indiana University, as well as the Max Kade Foundation and the DAAD. To all of my subjects who opened their homes and offered their time and friendship to help with this project, I thank you. Many friends and colleagues at Indiana University were an integral part of my graduate school experience, offering support as I completed this degree and dissertation. iv Andrew Kostakis, thank you for your steadfast encouragement and ever helpful advice about the degree, research projects, and all things life. Olivia Landry, I could never have come so far without your faithful friendship over the last nine years. Thank you for always being my go-to listener and venting partner. Many thanks go to others who generously offered their friendship and support throughout my graduate school years: Lane Sorensen, Jenn Strayer Sorensen, Franzi Krüger, Silja Weber, Kevin Seitz, Michael Bryant, Megan Barrett, Michael Eith, and Justin Glover. Thank you also to Mary Cauble and Lois Larsen, who have been wonderfully kind and understanding friends. Deepest thanks go to my family, particularly my mom Bonnita Laub, who has been my number one supporter always. I love you, Mom. Finally, thank you to my husband Joseph, who has been right there with me throughout this entire project. Thank you for uprooting everything and moving to Germany just for me and for supporting me through ALL the highs and lows. I treasure you. v Erin Noelliste THE PHONOLOGY OF SONORANTS IN BAVARIAN GERMAN In this dissertation, I investigate the phonological behavior of Bavarian German liquids, nasals, and vowels. These sounds undergo various changes, depending on the context, and I examine these changes in terms of features, which are determined via a contrastive hierarchy. This dissertation departs from traditional studies on German dialects, which are purely descriptive; the goal of this dissertation is to not only describe the facts from a particular dialect, but also to show how new data bear on theoretical issues in phonology. In chapter 2, I focus on demographics and methods, discussing my BG subjects and giving relevant information about the region and town in which they live. I also explain methodology of data collection and analysis. Chapter 3 presents the phonology and features of BG. I outline the underlying consonantal and vocalic segments of the dialect, providing data for contrasts and presenting distinctive features. The latter part of the chapter uses contrastive features to analyze several processes which interact with rules involving sonorant consonants. Chapter 4 focuses on BG nasals and opaque rule interactions which involve that class of sounds. I show that opacity in some data is created with a feeding rule order, as opposed to a counterbleeding order argued in most traditional accounts of opacity. I also show how the interaction of rules concerning nasals and dorsal fricative assimilation sheds light on the feature representations of dorsal fricatives. The focus of chapter 5 is on the liquids /l ʀ/. I give the distribution for liquids and show that in the coda, both liquids vocalize via a rule of Liquid Vocalization. I also discuss vi how Liquid Vocalization interacts with other processes in this dialect, including rules from previous chapters. In chapter 6, I discuss hiatus and its avoidance in BG, showing that BG employs several repairs for hiatus sequences, particularly Homorganic Glide Formation, Consonant Epenthesis, and Vowel Elision. I discuss BG R-Epenthesis and give data for other epenthetic consonants in BG, showing that consonant epenthesis in English and BG are not entirely the same. In chapter 7, I summarize the dissertation and suggest directions for future research. ______________________________________ Tracy Alan Hall, Ph.D. (chair) ______________________________________ Kari Gade, Ph.D. ______________________________________ Kenneth de Jong, Ph.D. ______________________________________ Susanne Even, Ph.D. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Goals.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Feature Geometry ...................................................................................................... 3 1.3 The Contrastive Feature Hierarchy ........................................................................... 6 1.4 Opacity .................................................................................................................... 12 1.5 Liquid Vocalizations ............................................................................................... 16 1.6 Hiatus ...................................................................................................................... 18 1.7 Consonant Epenthesis and Markedness .................................................................. 20 1.8 Summary of the Dissertation ................................................................................... 26 CHAPTER 2: DEMOGRAPHICS AND METHODS ..................................................................... 28 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 28 2.2 Demographics .......................................................................................................... 29 2.2.1 Bavarian German .............................................................................................. 29 2.2.2 Austrian Subjects .............................................................................................. 29 2.2.3 German Subjects ............................................................................................... 32 2.3 Pilot Studies............................................................................................................. 33 2.4 Year-Long Study ..................................................................................................... 34 2.4.1 Methods of Data Elicitation .............................................................................. 34 2.4.2 Methods of Data Analysis ................................................................................ 39 CHAPTER 3: RG PHONOLOGY AND FEATURES ................................................................... 41 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 41 3.2 RG Consonants ........................................................................................................ 42 3.2.1 RG Consonant Distribution .............................................................................. 42 3.2.2 Distinctive Features of RG Consonants............................................................ 50 3.3 RG Vowels .............................................................................................................. 53 3.3.1 RG Vowel Distribution ..................................................................................... 53 3.3.2 Distinctive Features of RG Vowels .................................................................. 58 3.3.3 RG Diphthongs ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4. R-Influence on Vowels
    4. R-influence on vowels Before you study this chapter, check whether you are familiar with the following terms: allophone, centring diphthong, complementary distribution, diphthong, distribution, foreignism, fricative, full vowel, GA, hiatus, homophone, Intrusive-R, labial, lax, letter-to-sound rule, Linking-R, low-starting diphthong, minimal pair, monophthong, morpheme, nasal, non-productive suffix, non-rhotic accent, phoneme, productive suffix, rhotic accent, R-dropping, RP, tense, triphthong This chapter mainly focuses on the behaviour of full vowels before an /r/, the phonological and letter-to-sound rules related to this behaviour and some further phenomena concerning vowels. As it is demonstrated in Chapter 2 the two main accent types of English, rhotic and non-rhotic accents, are most easily distinguished by whether an /r/ is pronounced in all positions or not. In General American, a rhotic accent, all /r/'s are pronounced while in Received Pronunciation, a non-rhotic variant, only prevocalic ones are. Besides this, these – and other – dialects may also be distinguished by the behaviour of stressed vowels before an /r/, briefly mentioned in the previous chapter. To remind the reader of the most important vowel classes that will be referred to we repeat one of the tables from Chapter 3 for convenience. Tense Lax Monophthongs i, u, 3 , e, , , , , , , 1, 2 Diphthongs and , , , , , , , , triphthongs , Chapter 4 Recall that we have come up with a few generalizations in Chapter 3, namely that all short vowels are lax, all diphthongs and triphthongs are tense, non- high long monophthongs are lax, except for //, which behaves in an ambiguous way: sometimes it is tense, in other cases it is lax.
    [Show full text]
  • Signature Sound Summaries
    SIGNATURE SOUND SUMMARIES This is a condensed version of the signature sounds and additional features described in detail in the books and booklets published by Paul Meier Dialect Services. Use this “cheat sheet” for quick, easy reference, but only after you have fully understood the complete text with its many details, exceptions, and qualifying remarks. The accent/dialect summaries are listed below in alphabetical order, one page each for easy printing and use. Accent/Dialect Page Afrikaans 2 American Southern 3 Australian 4 Cockney 5 Deep South 6 Downeast N. England 7 French 8 General American 9 German 10 Hampshire 11 Indian 12 Irish 13 Italian 14 Liverpool 15 New York 16 Northern Ireland 17 Russian 18 Scottish 19 South Boston 20 Spanish 21 Stand. British English 22 Welsh 23 Yiddish 24 Yorkshire 25 ©Paul Meier Dialect Services, 2009 http://www.paulmeier.com SIGNATURE SOUND SUMMARIES AFRIKAANS SIGNATURE SOUNDS 1. kit [ə] sometimes [i] if [p, t, or k] follows 2. dress [e or ɪ] 3. trap [ɛ] 4. lot/cloth [ɒ̹] 5. foot [u] 6. bath [ɑ̹] 7. non-rhotic; /r/ following vowel is silent 8. nurse [ɞ] 9. face [aɪ] 10. thought [ɔ]̹ 11. goat [ɐɘ] 12. goose [ʉ]; [j] used before the vowel following alveolar consonants 13. /h/ elided 14. pre-vocalic /r/ [ɾ or r] 15. voiced /th/ [d̪]; unvoiced /th/ [f] ADDITIONAL FEATURES a. no aspiration for [p, t, k], esp. initially in word or syllable b. final voiced obstruents devoiced c. unstressed /-et/, /-ed/ endings [ət, əd], e.g. pocketed [ˈpɒ̹kətəd] d. pure vowel, not schwa in initial unstressed syllables.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bavarian-Speaking Exception in Alemannic-Speaking Switzerland: the Case of Samnaun 48 Located
    47 A Bavarian -speaking 1. Introduction1 data2 is missing, as the study by Gröger is the Exception in Alemannic- only detailed linguistic description of the speaking Switzerland: he municipality of Samnaun, situated German dialect in Samnaun. in the extreme east of Switzerland, In this paper, I present a new research The Case of Samnaun project which seeks to fill this gap. The T stands out from the rest of German- speaking Switzerland: Samnaun is usually project is dedicated to the current linguistic A Project Presentation described as the only place where not an situation in Samnaun. Its working title is Alemannic, but a Bavarian dialect is spoken Bairisch-alemannischer Sprachkontakt. Das Journal Article (cf., e.g., Sonderegger 2003: 2839; Wiesinger Spektrum der sprachlichen Variation in Susanne Oberholzer 1983: 817). This claim is based on a study by Samnaun (‘Bavarian-Alemannic Language Gröger (1924) and has found its way into Contact. The Range of Linguistic Variation in Samnaun has been described as the only Samnaun’). This paper describes Samnaun Bavarian-speaking municipality in Ale- many linguistic descriptions of (German- mannic-speaking Switzerland on the basis speaking) Switzerland. In the literature, this and summarises the available descriptions of of a study done in 1924. Hints in the viewpoint has been almost unchallenged for its language situation as well as the aims, literature about the presence of other over 90 years. Hints about the presence of research questions, and methods of the varieties for everyday communication – an other varieties (an Alemannic dialect as well planned project. intermediate variety on the dialect- In section 2, I sketch the municipality of standard -axis as well as an Alemannic as an intermediate variety on the dialect- dialect – have not resulted in more recent standard-axis) from the second half of the Samnaun.
    [Show full text]
  • Segmental Phonology and the Perception of Syntactic Structure
    JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR 23, 450-466 (1984) Segmental Phonology and the Perception of Syntactic Structure DONIA R. SCOTT University of Sussex AND ANNE CUTLER MRC Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge Recent research in speech production has shown that syntactic structure is reflected in segmental phonology--the application of certain phonological rules of English (e.g., pala- talization and alveolar flapping) is inhibited across phrase boundaries. We examined whether such segmental effects can be used in speech perception as cues to syntactic structure, and the relation between the use of these segmental features as syntactic markers in production and perception. Speakers of American English (a dialect in which the above segmental effects occur) could indeed use the segmental cues in syntax perception; speakers of British English (in which the effects do not occur) were unable to make use of them, while speakers of British English who were long-term residents of the United States showed intermediate performance. Anyone who has had to make the sepa- dangerous") (Lehiste, 1973). But the fact rate meanings of an ambiguous sentence that listeners can successfully identify the clear to listeners will know that often the intended meaning even in the absence of a most efficient method is just to say the sen- disambiguating context suggests that tence in different ways. Of course, some speakers can exploit acoustic features to sentences will be more difficult to disam- highlight the distinction that is to be con- biguate in this manner than others; in gen- veyed to the listener. eral, surface structure ambiguities (e.g., In recent years, a number of studies on "The old men and women stayed at English speech perception have investi- home") prove easier than deep structure gated just what these acoustic correlates of ambiguities (e.g., "Flying planes can be syntactic structure are, and how useful they are to the listener.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample, Not for Administration Or Resale
    ANALYSIS FORM Linda M. L. Khan and Nancy P. Lewis Age Calculation Name: ______________________________________________________ u Female u Male Year Month Day Test Date Grade/Ed. Level: __________ School/Agency: __________________________________________ Language(s) Spoken in the Home: ___________________________________________________ Birth Date Examiner: ____________________________________________________________________ Reason for Testing: ______________________________________________________________ Age ____________________________________________________________________________ Reminder: Do not round up to next month or year. KLPA–3 Score Summary Confidence Interval *Total Raw Score Standard Score 90% 95% Percentile Rank Age Equivalent SAMPLE,– * Raw score equals total number of occurrences of scored phonological processes. Percent of OccurrenceNOT for Core Phonological ProcessesFOR Vowel Alterations Number of Total Possible Percent of Notes: Phonological Process Occurrences Occurrences Occurrences DeaffricationADMINISTRATION (DF) of 8 = % Gliding of liquids (GL) of 20 = % Stopping of fricatives and affricates (ST) of 48 = % Dialectal Influence Manner OR RESALE Stridency deletion (STR) of 42 = % Yes No Vocalization (VOC) of 15 = % Notes: Palatal fronting (PF) of 12 = % Place Velar fronting (VF) of 23 = % Cluster simplification (CS) of 23 = % Overall Intelligibility Deletion of final consonant (DFC) of 36 = % Good Fair Poor Reduction Syllable reduction (SR) of 25 = % Notes: Final devoicing (FDV) of 35 = % Voicing Initial voicing
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/30/2021 10:48:31PM Via Free Access
    journal of language contact 11 (2018) 71-112 brill.com/jlc The Development of Phonological Stratification: Evidence from Stop Voicing Perception in Gurindji Kriol and Roper Kriol Jesse Stewart University of Saskatchewan [email protected] Felicity Meakins University of Queensland [email protected] Cassandra Algy Karungkarni Arts [email protected] Angelina Joshua Ngukurr Language Centre [email protected] Abstract This study tests the effect of multilingualism and language contact on consonant perception. Here, we explore the emergence of phonological stratification using two alternative forced-choice (2afc) identification task experiments to test listener perception of stop voicing with contrasting minimal pairs modified along a 10-step continuum. We examine a unique language ecology consisting of three languages spo- ken in Northern Territory, Australia: Roper Kriol (an English-lexifier creole language), Gurindji (Pama-Nyungan), and Gurindji Kriol (a mixed language derived from Gurindji and Kriol). In addition, this study focuses on three distinct age groups: children (group i, 8>), preteens to middle-aged adults (group ii, 10–58), and older adults (group iii, 65+). Results reveal that both Kriol and Gurindji Kriol listeners in group ii contrast the labial series [p] and [b]. Contrarily, while alveolar [t] and velar [k] were consis- tently identifiable by the majority of participants (74%), their voiced counterparts ([d] and [g]) showed random response patterns by 61% of the participants. Responses © Jesse Stewart et al., 2018 | doi 10.1163/19552629-01101003 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the prevailing cc-by-nc license at the time of publication.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Alberta
    University of Alberta Making Magyars, Creating Hungary: András Fáy, István Bezerédj and Ödön Beöthy’s Reform-Era Contributions to the Development of Hungarian Civil Society by Eva Margaret Bodnar A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Department of History and Classics © Eva Margaret Bodnar Spring 2011 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Abstract The relationship between magyarization and Hungarian civil society during the reform era of Hungarian history (1790-1848) is the subject of this dissertation. This thesis examines the cultural and political activities of three liberal oppositional nobles: András Fáy (1786-1864), István Bezerédj (1796-1856) and Ödön Beöthy (1796-1854). These three men were chosen as the basis of this study because of their commitment to a two- pronged approach to politics: they advocated greater cultural magyarization in the multiethnic Hungarian Kingdom and campaigned to extend the protection of the Hungarian constitution to segments of the non-aristocratic portion of the Hungarian population.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of the West-Central-Bavarian Vowel System - a Comparison Between Adults and Children
    Characteristics of the West-Central-Bavarian vowel system - a comparison between adults and children The West-Central-Bavarian (WCB) dialect, which is spoken in the south of Germany and in most parts of Austria, has often been a subject of research, due to its large vowel system with an astonishing number of diphthongs, that do not exist in the corresponding Standard language at all. Although there is a large amount of literature concerned with descriptions of the dialect, nearly all of it is based on impressionistic auditory descriptions (Zehetner, 1985; Merkle, 1976; Capell, 1979; Mansell, 1973a; Keller, 1961; Mansell, 1973a). While in the last decades systematic acoustic analyses on the Austrian side of the Bavarian dialect have been increasingly elaborated (Moosmüller et al.), the German side still remains largely unexplored. However, there is much evidence that Standard German (SG) is superimposed on German dialects, causing sound change in the respective dialects (e.g. Müller et al. (2001) for East-Franconian, Bukmaier & Harrington (2014) for Augsburg German). The goal of the current study was 1) to systematically measure some of the defining vowel characteristics of WCB for an acoustically based analysis of the Bavarian vowel system and 2) to investigate whether these characteristics are being preserved across generations or if there is a sound change in progress observable, in which young speakers show more standard characteristics than old on some attributes of vowels where Bavarian and the Standard are known to differ. The new concept for testing 2) is to combine synchronic and diachronic approaches in order to detect sound change.
    [Show full text]
  • LT3212 Phonetics Assignment 4 Mavis, Wong Chak Yin
    LT3212 Phonetics Assignment 4 Mavis, Wong Chak Yin Essay Title: The sound system of Japanese This essay aims to introduce the sound system of Japanese, including the inventories of consonants, vowels, and diphthongs. The phonological variations of the sound segments in different phonetic environments are also included. For the illustration, word examples are given and they are presented in the following format: [IPA] (Romaji: “meaning”). Consonants In Japanese, there are 14 core consonants, and some of them have a lot of allophonic variations. The various types of consonants classified with respect to their manner of articulation are presented as follows. Stop Japanese has six oral stops or plosives, /p b t d k g/, which are classified into three place categories, bilabial, alveolar, and velar, as listed below. In each place category, there is a pair of plosives with the contrast in voicing. /p/ = a voiceless bilabial plosive [p]: [ippai] (ippai: “A cup of”) /b/ = a voiced bilabial plosive [b]: [baɴ] (ban: “Night”) /t/ = a voiceless alveolar plosive [t]: [oto̞ ːto̞ ] (ototo: “Brother”) /d/ = a voiced alveolar plosive [d]: [to̞ mo̞ datɕi] (tomodachi: “Friend”) /k/ = a voiceless velar plosive [k]: [kaiɰa] (kaiwa: “Conversation”) /g/ = a voiced velar plosive [g]: [ɡakɯβsai] (gakusai: “Student”) Phonetically, Japanese also has a glottal stop [ʔ] which is commonly produced to separate the neighboring vowels occurring in different syllables. This phonological phenomenon is known as ‘glottal stop insertion’. The glottal stop may be realized as a pause, which is used to indicate the beginning or the end of an utterance. For instance, the word “Japanese money” is actually pronounced as [ʔe̞ ɴ], instead of [je̞ ɴ], and the pronunciation of “¥15” is [dʑɯβːɡo̞ ʔe̞ ɴ].
    [Show full text]
  • Imperceptible Incomplete Neutralization
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Lingua 152 (2014) 24--44 www.elsevier.com/locate/lingua Imperceptible incomplete neutralization: Production, non-identifiability, and non-discriminability in American English flapping Aaron Braver * Texas Tech University, Department of English, P.O. Box 43091, Lubbock, TX 79409-3091, United States Received 1 November 2012; received in revised form 6 September 2014; accepted 9 September 2014 Available online Abstract Flapping in American English has been put forward as a case of incomplete neutralization---in other words, /d/-flaps and /t/-flaps differ at the phonetic level. This paper first presents a production experiment which shows that, in line with previous work, flapping in American English is incompletely neutralizing: vowels before /d/-flaps are slightly longer than those before /t/-flaps---even in nonce words. Early studies on the perceptibility of this difference, almost exclusively identification tasks, have shown mixed results. However, recent identification experiments (including one reported here) show that listeners are unable to properly categorize /d/- and /t/-flaps. Listeners’ poor performance on identification tasks can be due to two factors: either (a) listeners’ grammars lacking the relevant phonological categories, or (b) an effect of the type of perception tasks employed. In a 2AFC discrimination task presented here, listeners were unable to distinguish between /d/- and /t/-flaps, suggesting that poor perception performance generalizes to multiple task types. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Incomplete neutralization; Flapping; Phonetics; American English 1. Introduction In American English flapping, underlying /d/ and /t/ become [ɾ] in certain prosodic configurations (e.g., Kahn, 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Trubetzkoy Final
    Chapman, S. & Routledge, P. (eds) (2005) Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Pp 267-268. Trubetzkoy, N.S. (Nikolai Sergeevich); (b. 1890, d. 1938; Russian), lecturer at Moscow University (1915-1916), Rostov-on-Don University (1918), Sofia University (1920-1922), finally professor of Slavic linguistics at Vienna University (1922-1938). One of the founding fathers of phonology and a key theorist of the Prague School. (See Also: *Jakobson, Roman; *Martinet, André). Trubetzkoy’s life was blighted by persecution. Born in Moscow of aristocratic, academic parents, Trubetzkoy (whose names have been transliterated variously) was a prince, and, after study and an immediate start to a university career in Moscow, he was forced to flee by the 1917 revolution; he subsequently also had to leave Rostov and Sofia. On settling in Vienna, he became a geographically distant member of the Prague Linguistic Circle. It is at times difficult to tease his ideas apart from those of his friend *Jakobson, who ensured that his nearly-finished Grundzüge der Phonologie (1939) was posthumously published. Trubetzkoy had previously published substantial work in several fields, but this was his magnum opus. It summarised his previous phonological work and stands now as the classic statement of Prague School phonology, setting out an array of phonological ideas, several of which still characterise debate on phonological representations. Through it, the publications which preceded it, his work at conferences and general enthusiastic networking, Trubetzkoy was crucial in the development of phonology as a discipline distinct from phonetics, and the change in phonological focus from diachrony to synchrony.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Phonological Consonant Epenthesis Possible? a Series of Artificial Grammar Learning Experiments
    Is Phonological Consonant Epenthesis Possible? A Series of Artificial Grammar Learning Experiments Rebecca L. Morley Abstract Consonant epenthesis is typically assumed to be part of the basic repertoire of phonological gram- mars. This implies that there exists some set of linguistic data that entails epenthesis as the best analy- sis. However, a series of artificial grammar learning experiments found no evidence that learners ever selected an epenthesis analysis. Instead, phonetic and morphological biases were revealed, along with individual variation in how learners generalized and regularized their input. These results, in combi- nation with previous work, suggest that synchronic consonant epenthesis may only emerge very rarely, from a gradual accumulation of changes over time. It is argued that the theoretical status of epenthesis must be reconsidered in light of these results, and that investigation of the sufficient learning conditions, and the diachronic developments necessary to produce those conditions, are of central importance to synchronic theory generally. 1 Introduction Epenthesis is defined as insertion of a segment that has no correspondent in the relevant lexical, or un- derlying, form. There are various types of epenthesis that can be defined in terms of either the insertion environment, the features of the epenthesized segment, or both. The focus of this paper is on consonant epenthesis and, more specifically, default consonant epenthesis that results in markedness reduction (e.g. Prince and Smolensky (1993/2004)). Consonant
    [Show full text]