DOCSLIB.ORG

London Underground

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
London Underground ______________________________________ Technical Specification for London Underground Railway Timetable Data - Common User Format File ______________________________________ LU/ED Version 4.0 Issue Dated 19 August 2015 Implementation Date 6 September 2015 Alterations up to and including 21 July 2015 Common User Format File 4.0 Table of Contents 1. DETAILED REVISION HISTORY .............................................................................................................5 1.1 Revisions starting from version 3.0 ................................................................................................5 1.2 Revisions from version 3.1 .............................................................................................................5 1.3 Revisions from version 3.2 .............................................................................................................6 1.4 Revisions from version 3.3 .............................................................................................................6 2. GENERAL ................................................................................................................................................8 2.1 File Naming Conventions................................................................................................................8 2.2 File Content and Format .................................................................................................................9 2.2.1 ID File .........................................................................................................................................9 2.2.2 The Header (HDR) File ........................................................................................................... 11 2.2.3 The CUF Event (EVT) File ...................................................................................................... 13 2.2.4 The Checksum (CHK) File ...................................................................................................... 16 2.3 Notes – Standard CUF File.......................................................................................................... 16 2.4 Notes – Signal Control System Specific (SCCS) CUF File ......................................................... 17 2.5 Notes – All outputs ....................................................................................................................... 18 2.6 Clock Change Arrangements ...................................................................................................... 19 3. APPENDIX A ......................................................................................................................................... 20 3.1 Day of Use Codes ........................................................................................................................ 20 4. APPENDIX B ......................................................................................................................................... 21 4.1 Day Restriction Codes ................................................................................................................. 21 5. APPENDIX C ......................................................................................................................................... 22 5.1 Site Codes ................................................................................................................................... 22 6. APPENDIX D ......................................................................................................................................... 25 6.1 Facility Identifiers ......................................................................................................................... 25 7. APPENDIX E ......................................................................................................................................... 27 7.1 Local Routeing Options ............................................................................................................... 27 8. APPENDIX F ......................................................................................................................................... 29 8.1 Unique Location Codes ............................................................................................................... 29 9. APPENDIX G ......................................................................................................................................... 38 9.1 Checksum Calculation Coding .................................................................................................... 38 C-EDMS Ref. ED-6-2-279 Page 2 of 38 Common User Format File 4.0 Distribution Name Position/Organisation Doug Green Signals and C&I Asset Engineer, Tube Lines Mike James Line Upgrade Engineer, ED Hugh Bridge Line Upgrade Engineer, ED Phil Dubery Line Upgrade Engineer, ED Jim Mason C&I Asset Engineer, Metronet SSL Paul Hartwell C&I Asset Engineer, Metronet BCV Clive Richards Control System Manager, Tube Lines Ray Hughes (retired) Systems Team Manager, LU Charles Horsey Scheduling Services Manager, LU Nick Freezer Team Leader CART, LU Mike Davies Planning Analyst, LU Malcolm Turner C&I Asset Engineer, ED Ken Chan Application Delivery Team Lead, LU Fiona Irving Service Control Standards Manager (SSR), LU Steve Lammin Production Manager, Tube Lines Roger Creed Engineering Manager, Tube Lines Jon Nye Performance Manager, LU Ollie O’Callaghan Data Maintainer, LU Tayo Oseni Journey Planner Development Manager, LU Nick Rusz Service Performance Information Manager, LU Alan Smith Integration Task Manager, LU Tope Songonuga Production Manager, LU Data@journeyplan History Date Release Author Description 25/04/06 Issue 3 Ray Hughes the amount of data provided has been increased and re-organisation of the file structures has increased the number of files from two to four following a review of the original file formats. 10/08/06 Issue Not formally Some minor grammatical errors have been corrected. 3.1 issued Prefaces to versions prior to version 3.0 have been deleted. Trip Start Location and Trip End Location fields have been added. Unique Location Code fields have been added. The number of characters in the Field Codes for the Arrival and Departure Time fields in the CUF file has been increased to six. The notes associated with the CUF file have been enhanced. The File Extension Codes shown in Appendix A have been amended. Appendix F has been added. Issue Ray Hughes Pointers to code definitions added to field explanations sections 2.2 and 2.3. 3.2 Correction of field separator between last two fields of sample record format in paragraph 2.2.2 Insertion of field separator between eleventh and twelfth fields of sample record format in paragraph 2.2.3 Introduction of paragraph 2.2.4 detailing content of the Checksum (.CHK) file. Clarification / correction made to Appendix B regarding presence of Day Restriction Codes on trips Removal of three character codes from site details in Appendix D and E Correction of Unique Location Codes for Baker Street platforms 7 and 9 Appendix E has been revised to clarify the instances where local routes are used which has resulted in a number of irrelevant entries being removed Appendix F has been enhanced to clarify when some location codes will/won’t appear in the output files, to add a new location code for Barking No. 30 Road, to correct the wording of some entries at White City, to correct the Unique Location Codes for Baker Street platforms 7 and 9, to correct the Unique Location Codes for both Aldgate North Junction locations and to remove a duplicate entry for Golders Green No. 26 Road. Issue Ray Hughes/ Correction made to wording in section 2.2.2 3.3 Nick Freezer Appendix C has been changed to replace White City (C&H) with Wood Lane, and to delete records for closed East London Line sites. Appendix E has been modified to include Local Routes on departures from Woodford to South Woodford and to include the road numbers in the descriptions of Newbury Park and Debden Loops. Appendix F has been changed to correct the code for Newbury Park 31 Road, to add location codes for Stanmore platform 3, Stratford Market Junction Holding Roads 1 and 2 and Wood Lane Station platforms 1 and 2, to delete records for closed East London Line sites and to highlight the forthcoming removal of St Mary’s Junction records from output. A new Appendix G has been added detailing the coding used to calculate Checksum values 21/1/15 Issue Nick Freezer Introduction of Signal Control Centre Specific format CUF files 4.0 Revisions made for regular overnight operation C-EDMS Ref. ED-6-2-279 Page 3 of 38 Common User Format File 4.0 Date Release Author Description Additional fields provided in ID file to explicitly indicate that overnight running is applicable for the file set. Minor corrections have been made to the existing text where necessary. File naming convention changed to allow more information to be shown in file name. Section 2.2 and Appendix C revised to reflect continuation of Sutor code support. Section 2.3 split into sections 2.3 to 2.5 to reflect differences between standard and signal control format CUF files. Section 2.6 introduced to describe actions for overnight operation on clock change weekends Appendix A revised to include additional codes for overnight operation on clock change weekends. Revision associated with following changes: • Commissioning of West Ham Siding in lieu of Plaistow WB Line Reversing Berth
Load more

Recommended publications
  • London Underground Traffic Circular Supplements — Part 2 Section 1 1992-2000
    11 June 2012 (rev 6) London Underground Traffic Circular Supplements — Part 2 Section 1 1992-2000 These are numbered sequentially each year starting at 1 and running to the highest number issued that year. No Line(s) Description Operative Date 1992 1 All Fares Revision Instructions 5 January 1992 2 C South Ruislip, Commissioning of signalling and local control stage 3 August 1992 3 C Northolt, Commissioning of signalling and local control stage 13 October 1992 4 C Greenford/Perivale/Hanger Lane, New signalling 9 November 1992 Postponed to Monday 30 November per TC 47/92 1993 1 All Fares Revision Instructions January 1993 2 All Replacement pages for Supplement to Section 2 to Rule Book, Guide to Switching Traction Current on and Off. January 1993 3 C Ruislip Gardens, New signalling and local control stage 18 January 1993 4 C North Acton, Commissioning of signalling and local control stage 22 March 1993 5 C Ealing Broadway & West Acton, New signalling 10 May 1993 6 C Shepherds Bush & Holland Park, Commissioning of signalling and local control stage 23 August 1993 7 C Notting Hill Gate, Commissioning of signalling and local control stage 13 September 8 C Queensway & Lancaster Gate, Commissioning of signalling and local control stage 1 November 1993 9 All Replacement pages for Supplement to Section 2 to Rule Book, Guide to Switching Traction Current on and Off. October 1993 10 C Oxford Circus, Commissioning of signalling and local control stage 6 December 1993 W:\WRITINGS\Other publications in hand\Traffic Circular Supplements Part 2.doc Created on 12-Jun-12 Last printed 12-Jun-12 (1) 11 June 2012 (rev 6) 11 C Tottenham Court Road, Commissioning of signalling and local control stage 6 December 1993 12 All Replacement pages for Supplement to Section 2 to Rule Book, Guide to Switching Traction Current on and Off.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Accident Report
    Rail Accident Report Derailment of a passenger train at Ealing Broadway 2 March 2016 Report 24/2016 December 2016 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2016 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.gov.uk/raib DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Preface Preface The purpose of a Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) investigation is to improve railway safety by preventing future railway accidents or by mitigating their consequences. It is not the purpose of such an investigation to establish blame or liability. Accordingly, it is inappropriate that RAIB reports should be used to assign fault or blame, or determine liability, since neither the investigation nor the reporting process has been undertaken for that purpose. The RAIB’s findings are based on its own evaluation of the evidence that was available at the time of the investigation and are intended to explain what happened, and why, in a fair and unbiased manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Capacity Study Update
    Chiltern & South Bucks Local Plan 2036 Settlement Capacity Study Page 0 of 122 Chiltern & South Bucks Local Plan 2036 Settlement Capacity Study Introduction Local authorities are encouraged by Paragraph 65 of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) to set out a housing requirement for designated neighbourhood areas as part of their strategic policies. This is to enable neighbourhood plans to provide sufficient housing sites to meet their expected allocation. All currently-designated neighbourhood areas in Chiltern and South Bucks Districts share their boundaries with parish boundaries. It is anticipated that any future designations will also be for town council or parish council areas rather than for areas smaller or larger than these. The purpose of this study is to calculate required housing numbers for each parish within Chiltern and South Bucks. The Planning Practice Guidance1 confirms that there is no set methodology available for doing this, stating “the general policy making process already undertaken by local authorities can continue to be used to direct development requirements and balance needs and protections by taking into consideration relevant policies such as the spatial strategy, evidence such as the Housing and economic land availability assessment, and the characteristics of the neighbourhood area, including its population and role in providing services. In setting requirements for housing in designated neighbourhood areas, plan-making authorities should consider the areas or assets of particular importance (as set out in paragraph 11, footnote 6), which may restrict the scale, type or distribution of development in a neighbourhood plan area”. The NPPF requires the housing requirement figure for a neighbourhood area to reflect the Local Plan’s overall strategy for the pattern and scale of development and any relevant allocations.
    [Show full text]
  • Homes Down the Track a Marathon and a Sprint For
    Homes Down the Track A marathon and a sprint for TfL Housing Committee June 2017 Holding the Mayor to account and investigating issues that matter to Londoners Housing Committee Members Sian Berry AM Tony Devenish AM Green Conservative Andrew Boff AM Nicky Gavron AM Conservative Labour David Kurten AM Leonie Cooper AM UKIP Labour Tom Copley AM Labour The Housing Committee scrutinises the Mayor’s role and record in delivering the private, social and affordable homes London needs. Contact Lorraine Ford, Scrutiny Manager Email: [email protected] Contact: 020 7983 4394 Follow us: @LondonAssembly facebook.com/london.assembly Contents Foreword ........................................................................... 5 Summary ............................................................................ 7 Summary Recommendations ............................................. 9 1. Using public land for housing ................................... 11 2. Developing TfL’s land assets .................................... 16 3. Delivering TfL homes ............................................... 22 Appendix 1 – Indicative map of TfL’s London land assets 31 Appendix 2 – Current list of TfL sites identified for residential development .................................................. 32 Appendix 3 – TfL’s Property Partnership Framework membership ..................................................................... 33 Our approach ................................................................... 34 References ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Years Ago – a Postscript
    50 YEARS AGO – A POSTSCRIPT METROPOLITAN MODERNISATION Whilst some of us will recall the late-1950s and early 1960s as the period “when it all happened”, there was a lot going on much earlier. Here is a selection of what happened, details being obtained from the Traffic Circulars of the time. Some items may not be directly relevant but nevertheless are included for interest, if only that London Transport were bringing the Metropolitan Line up to date and ‘in line’ with the rest of the network. Date Brief details 02.01.50 “Stop-and-Proceed” abolished north of Harrow-on-the-Hill and all signals, semi- automatic and automatic, provided with signal post telephones. All trains to receive authority from relevant signalman before passing any signal at danger. Signal boxes affected were Watford Station (JL), Croxley (B), Watford Junction (C), Northwood (E), Pinner (G) and Harrow Station (JB). 01.50 Telephones provided on Chesham line (to signalmen at Chalfont & Latimer and Chesham) at One Mile Post, Two Mile Post and Three Mile Post. 04.06.50 Track slewed on a new alignment 30ft west of present from 1,000ft north of Watford South Junction to 1,500ft south of Watford South Junction, to allow bridges MR78, MR80 and MR81 to be taken out of use. 17.06.50 From midnight, maintenance responsibility for track, works & buildings and signalling between 28½ mile post (Mantles Wood) and 37 miles 195 yards, about ¾ mile south of Aylesbury South Junction, will be transferred from Railway Executive to London Transport. 25.06.50 London Transport to take over responsibility for management of ex-Joint Line from Harrow to Aylesbury South Junction including Watford and Chesham branches.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Committee 23/05/2018 Schedule Item No. 03
    Planning Committee 23/05/2018 Schedule Item No. 03 Ref : 181062OPDFUL Address: 140 Wales Farm Road, Acton W3 6UG Ward: East Acton Proposal: Demolition of existing buildings and redevelopment of site to provide 3 No. residential buildings between 12 and 25 storeys in height to provide 380 residential units (comprising 66 No. studios, 190 No. 1 bed, 104 No. 2 bed and 20 No. 3 bed flats) and 1,403 sq.m of flexible A1/A2/A3/A4/A5/B1/D1/D2 floor space; the provision of public open space, roof top amenity space, landscaping, car and cycle parking, and refuse storage (Full Planning Application accompanied by an Environmental Impact Assessment: Resubmission). Drawing numbers/plans: Drawing numbers for Job Number 16043: (01)-E-100 Revision PL; (01)-E-001 Revision PL; (01)-E-002 Revision PL; (01)-E- 003 Revision PL; (01)-E-004 Revision PL; (03)-P-S000 Revision PL; (01)-P-S001 Revision PL; (01)-P-S002 Revision PL; (03)-E-200 Revision PL; (03)-E-201 Revision A; (03)-E-202 Revision PL; (03)-E-203 Revision PL; (03)-E-204 Revision PL; (03)-E-205 Revision PL; (03)-E-206 Revision PL; (03)-E-207 Revision PL; (03)-E-220 Revision A; (03)-E-221 Revision PL; (03)-P-0B0 Revision PL; (03)-P-0G0 Revision PL; (03)-P-0M0 Revision PL; (03)-P-001 Revision A; (03)-P-002 Revision A; (03)-P-011 Revision A; (03)-P-012 Revision A; (03)-P-013 Revision PL; (03)-P-015 Revision PL; (03)-P-016 Revision PL; (03)-P-022 Revision PL; (03)-P-023 Revision PL; (03)-P-0R0 Revision PL; (03)-X-100 Revision PL; (03)-X-101 Revision PL; (03)-X-102 Revision PL; (03)-X-103 Revision PL; (03)-E-250
    [Show full text]
  • Part 3 of the Bibliography Catalogue
    Bibliography - L&NWR Society Periodicals Part 3 - Railway Magazine Registered Charity - L&NWRSociety No. 1110210 Copyright LNWR Society 2012 Title Year Volume Page Railway Magazine Photos. Junction at Craven Arms Photos. Tyne-Mersey Power. Lime Street, Diggle 138 Why and Wherefore. Soho Road station 465 Recent Work by British Express Locomotives Inc. Photo. 2-4-0 No.419 Zillah 1897 01/07 20 Some Racing Runs and Trial Trips. 1. The Race to Edinburgh 1888 - The Last Day 1897 01/07 39 What Our Railways are Doing. Presentation to F.Harrison from Guards 1897 01/07 90 What Our Railways are Doing. Trains over 50 mph 1897 01/07 90 Pertinent Paragraphs. Jubilee of 'Cornwall' 1897 01/07 94 Engine Drivers and their Duties by C.J.Bowen Cooke. Describes Rugby with photos at the 1897 01/08 113 Photo.shed. 'Queen Empress' on corridor dining train 1897 01/08 133 Some Railway Myths. Inc The Bloomers, with photo and Precedent 1897 01/08 160 Petroleum Fuel for Locomotives. Inc 0-4-0WT photo. 1897 01/08 170 What The Railways are Doing. Services to Greenore. 1897 01/08 183 Pertinent Paragraphs. 'Jubilee' class 1897 01/08 187 Pertinent Paragraphs. List of 100 mile runs without a stop 1897 01/08 190 Interview Sir F.Harrison. Gen.Manager .Inc photos F.Harrison, Lord Stalbridge,F.Ree, 1897 01/09 193 TheR.Turnbull Euston Audit Office. J.Partington Chief of Audit Dept.LNW. Inc photos. 1897 01/09 245 24 Hours at a Railway Junction. Willesden (V.L.Whitchurch) 1897 01/09 263 What The Railways are Doing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Train Services on the Met and Gc Line
    THE EVOLUTION OF TRAIN SERVICES ON THE MET AND GC LINE by Eric Stuart (Readers may find reference to the Four-Tracking article in the July 2018 issue of Underground News helpful) After the Great Central (GC) arrived at Quainton Road and the service south thereof became established, both the GC and the Metropolitan Railway (Met.) provided services. However, the personalities at the heads of the two companies did not enjoy the best of relationships. Matters came to a head when a GC train crashed when failing to reduce speed over the (then) reverse curve into Aylesbury station in 1904. About that time, both the leaders retired and a period of better relations between the companies began. On 2 April 1906, the Metropolitan & Great Central Joint Railway (MGCJR) was created. This latter took over the lines of the Metropolitan Railway north and west of Harrow South Junction, with the exception of the branch to Uxbridge. These included the main line between Harrow-on-the-Hill and Verney Junction and the branch from Chalfont & Latimer to Chesham. The MGCJR was created under the terms of the Metropolitan & Great Central Railway Act, which received Royal Assent on 4 August 1905. At the same time, the Great Central and Great Western Joint Railway was formed, covering the lines south of Aylesbury via Princes Risborough to Northolt Junction. This was the result of a new line that aided the GC by partly avoiding congestion on the Met. and also giving the Great Western a shorter route to Birmingham1. One curiosity was that a Joint Committee was set up to manage a new Aylesbury station, jointly owned by two joint railways! Some points on terminology: The new line was commonly called just ‘The Joint Line’ and, even in later LT days, some staff still belonged to a particular class that made them feel superior to others2.
    [Show full text]
  • Buses from Ealing Common
    Buses from Ealing Common 483 towards Harrow Bus Station for Harrow-on-the-Hill Buses from Ealing Commonfrom stops EM, EP, ER N83 towards Golders Green from stops EM, EP, ER N7 483 towards Northolt Alperton towards Harrow Bus Station for Harrow-on-the-Hill from stops EH, EJ, EK, EL from stops EM, EP, ER 483 N83 N7 Argyle Road N83 towards Golders Green from stops EM, EP, ER N7 towardsE11 Northolt Alperton Route 112 towards North Finchley does not call at any bus stops within the central map. fromtowards stops Greenford EH, EJ, EK Broadway, EL Pitshanger Lane Ealing Road Route 112 towards North Finchley can be boarded from stops EW 483 at stops on Hanger Lane (Hillcrest Road, Station or N83 N7 Argyle Road Hanger Lane Gyratory). Quill Street 218 Castle Bar Park from stops Hanger Lane EA, ED, EE, EF Gyratory North Acton Woodeld Road Hanger Lane E11 Copley Close Route 112 towards North Finchley does not call 483 N83 at any bus stops within the central map. Northelds towards Greenford Broadway Road Pitshanger Lane Ealing Road Hanger Lane Route 112 towards North Finchley can be boarded Victoria from stops EW at stops on Hanger Lane (Hillcrest Road, Station or E11 Hillcrest Road 218 Road Browning Avenue N7 Hanger Lane Gyratory). 218 Quill Street Eastelds 218 Castle Bar Park Drayton Green Road North Ealing West Acton from stops Gypsy Hangerq Lane EA, ED, EE, EF Corner Eaton Rise IVE STATION APPROA GyratoryEEN’S DR CH e Westelds QU Road North Acton Woodeld Road ROAD Hanger Lane AD Copley Close 112 ELEY RO Noel Road MAD Northelds 483 N83‰ L Road
    [Show full text]
  • Lillie Enclave” Fulham
    Draft London Plan Consultation: ref. Chapter 7 Heritage - Neglect & Destruction February 2018 The “Lillie Enclave” Fulham Within a quarter mile radius of Lillie Bridge, by West Brompton station is A microcosm of the Industrial Revolution - A part of London’s forgotten heritage The enclave runs from Lillie Bridge along Lillie Road to North End Road and includes Empress (formerly Richmond) Place to the north and Seagrave Road, SW6 to the south. The roads were named by the Fulham Board of Works in 1867 Between the Grade 1 Listed Brompton Cemetery in RBKC and its Conservation area in Earl’s Court and the Grade 2 Listed Hermitage Cottages in H&F lies an astonishing industrial and vernacular area of heritage that English Heritage deems ripe for obliteration. See for example, COIL: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1439963. (Former HQ of Piccadilly Line) The area has significantly contributed to: o Rail and motor Transport o Building crafts o Engineering o Rail, automotive and aero industries o Brewing and distilling o Art o Sport, Trade exhibitions and mass entertainment o Health services o Green corridor © Lillie Road Residents Association, February1 2018 Draft London Plan Consultation: ref. Chapter 7 Heritage - Neglect & Destruction February 2018 Stanford’s 1864 Library map: The Lillie Enclave is south and west of point “47” © Lillie Road Residents Association, February2 2018 Draft London Plan Consultation: ref. Chapter 7 Heritage - Neglect & Destruction February 2018 Movers and Shakers Here are some of the people and companies who left their mark on just three streets laid out by Sir John Lillie in the old County of Middlesex on the border of Fulham and Kensington parishes Samuel Foote (1722-1777), Cornishman dramatist, actor, theatre manager lived in ‘The Hermitage’.
    [Show full text]
  • Retro Underground: the Seventies to the Noughties – 3
    RETRO UNDERGROUND: THE SEVENTIES TO THE NOUGHTIES – 3. OTHER EVENTS by Tony Morgan My earliest memories of the Underground are during the Second World War travelling from Kingsbury on the Bakerloo Line into London and sometimes on to Kent on the Southern Railway to visit relations. In 1968, after ten years of driving to North Acton, I started commuting in to Great Portland Street. While I was there the second section of the Victoria Line opened as far as Warren Street. One lunchtime I decided to have a quick trip on it. The 1967 Stock train came in to reverse back. The Train Operator was standing in the cab with his back to the direction of travel as the ATO stopped the train. Maybe this was being done to build confidence in the new control system. Travelling home one day from Great Portland Street I saw the latest LT Magazine on display in the ticket office. I then started buying it on a regular basis. The front cover of that first edition had a photograph of the C69 Stock about to be introduced on the Circle Line on it. From that magazine I found out about ‘The Last Drop’ event at Neasden Depot, on Sunday 6 June 1971 advertised, which celebrated the end of use of steam locomotives for engineers’ operations. There I joined the Society because of their Sales Stand. This was my first organised event. At this event all three remaining locomotives were in steam. L94 hauled a rake of engineers’ vehicles from the City and pulled into one of two Klondyke Sidings in Neasden depot.
    [Show full text]
  • Brent Valley & Barnet Plateau Area Framework All London Green Grid
    All Brent Valley & Barnet Plateau London Area Framework Green Grid 11 DRAFT Contents 1 Foreword and Introduction 2 All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology 3 ALGG Framework Plan 4 ALGG Area Frameworks 5 ALGG Governance 6 Area Strategy 9 Area Description 10 Strategic Context 11 Vision 14 Objectives 16 Opportunities 20 Project Identification 22 Clusters 24 Projects Map 28 Rolling Projects List 34 Phase One Early Delivery 36 Project Details 48 Forward Strategy 50 Gap Analysis 51 Recommendations 52 Appendices 54 Baseline Description 56 ALGG SPG Chapter 5 GGA11 Links 58 Group Membership Note: This area framework should be read in tandem with All London Green Grid SPG Chapter 5 for GGA11 which contains statements in respect of Area Description, Strategic Corridors, Links and Opportunities. The ALGG SPG document is guidance that is supplementary to London Plan policies. While it does not have the same formal development plan status as these policies, it has been formally adopted by the Mayor as supplementary guidance under his powers under the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (as amended). Adoption followed a period of public consultation, and a summary of the comments received and the responses of the Mayor to those comments is available on the Greater London Authority website. It will therefore be a material consideration in drawing up development plan documents and in taking planning decisions. The All London Green Grid SPG was developed in parallel with the area frameworks it can be found at the following link: http://www.london.gov.uk/publication/all-london- green-grid-spg . Cover Image: View across Silver Jubilee Park to the Brent Reservoir Foreword 1 Introduction – All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology Introduction Area Frameworks Partnership - Working The various and unique landscapes of London are Area Frameworks help to support the delivery of Strong and open working relationships with many recognised as an asset that can reinforce character, the All London Green Grid objectives.
    [Show full text]