City of Munich Department of Urban Planning

Projects, Planning and Prospects Contents

Work report – Projects, planning and prospects

4 Building blocks for the city’s future/Head of Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation, Prof. Dr.(I) Elisabeth Merk

6 Who we are

8 Strategies, concepts and programmes 9 01 Wohnen in München VI 10 02 Perspektive München 12 03 Long-term settlement development 13 04 Long-term open space development 14 05 Munich and the surrounding region 15 06 Development programme for commercial spaces 16 07 Guidelines on planning and construction in the historic centre 17 08 Planning and building culture 18 09 A city in touch with its people 20 10 Smart Munich

21 Plans and projects for more housing 22 11 Freiham 24 12 Munich’s north-east 26 13 The former Bayernkaserne site 27 14 Paul-Gerhardt-Allee 28 15 Prinz-Eugen-Park 29 16 Domagkpark 30 17 Paulaner site 31 18 Werksviertel 32 19 Am Südpark 33 20 Kreativquartier

34 Infrastructure and public space 35 21 Sendlinger Straße 36 22 The new Munich Central Station 38 23 Mittlerer Ring action programme 40 24 Transport concept for Munich’s north 41 25 Kunstareal 42 26 Town and river

43 Redevelopment 44 27 Neuperlach and Moosach 45 28 Neuaubing-Westkreuz 46 29 Central retail area in Pasing 47 30 District centre of Trudering 48 31 Tegernseer Landstraße / Chiemgaustraße

49 Topics addressed Wohnen für Alle // Socially-appropriate land use // Municipal housing associations // Community building // Preservation statutes // Conceptual rental housing // European work // Schul- und Kita- Bau 2020 action programme // Sustainable urban planning and climate conscious urban develop- ment // Construction supervision // Architectural conservation // Nature conservation

54 Imprint and image credits

3 Head of Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation, Prof. Dr.(I) Elisabeth Merk

Building blocks for the city’s future

The new Munich Central Station, the settlement development in Munich’s north-east and the next steps for the Kunstareal – I am delighted to present to you this new edition of the work report, which provides an overview of selected projects and also enables me to introduce the Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation’s diverse range of responsibilities. This natu- rally concerns home building, but also involves long-term prospects and strate- gic objectives regarding social infrastructure, mobility, public spaces and much more besides.

The central questions facing urban development to date have been: how can these developments be designed, and how would people like to live and work? Urban planners have the task of accompanying a city through its pro- cesses of change, as well as creating space for cultural encounters. The lively socio-political dialogue surrounding urban planning culture and the quality of urban construction and architectonic design in Munich underlines the extent to which residents identify with their city and their immediate living environment. Munich must remain a city with a high quality of life.

The core task of the Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation is, and will continue to be, to provide a broad spectrum when creating housing – something we call the “Munich mix” – and thereby ensure that the city retains its socially-balanced population. At the same time, housing construction in Munich should contribute to the identity of the city’s districts, with innovative solutions and high-quality architecture.

Since 1989, almost 165,000 new homes have been built in Munich. In future, the city aims to build a further 8,500 new homes per year. This is an ambitious target, as space is increasingly at a premium in the city. The process of obtain- ing planning permission, obtaining construction approvals and then completing a project is certainly a long one. Yet the city is currently working with “Wohnen in München VI”, the most comprehensive communal residential programme in Germany. The ongoing policy action programme runs until the end of 2021, and will see € 870 million of city funds deployed to construct affordable and subsidised homes.

Potential sites for development, as generated by the Long-term settlement development project through its “densification”, “restructuring” and “urban

4 fringe development” strategies, require the willing cooperation of numerous pro- tagonists. Growth does not end at the city limits, and so the Regional Alliance for Housing Construction and Infrastructure (Regionales Bündnis für Wohnungs- bau und Infrastruktur) was established to work together with towns and commu- nities in the region to make more land available for home building.

Various end uses are in competition for the remaining available land. More peo- ple also means greater infrastructure requirements. The school-building cam- paign alone needs space for at least 45 new schools by 2030. An increasing number of residents in Munich will also require sufficient open outdoor spaces. Should land be built on or left as open space? One strategy from the “Freiraum München 2030” concept is to “stack” open space over buildings, or to re-use spaces in an intelligent manner.

New mobility concepts are also a focus with regard to the future viability and sustainability of Munich and the European Metropolitan Region Munich (EMM). Effective collaboration as part of the EMM is crucial. The expansion of local pub- lic transport in the region and the increased efficacy of interfaces at Munich Cen- tral Station, the second Stammstrecke route and further tram and underground (U-Bahn) lines are essential developments if we are to shape individual mobil- ity and accessibility effectively despite the rising population in the city and the region.

Planning-related public relations and resident participation are essential require- ments of sustainable urban development. This is in part due to the growing demand for, and interest in, transparent information, communication and partici- pation.

At this point, I would like to thank everyone who contributes to our projects, as the City Council could not face the challenges of the coming years alone. Spe- cial thanks go to the residents of our city, who have supported these projects so thoughtfully, actively and discerningly. This is how it should be, of course – the city belongs to us all!

5 Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation

Who we are

Introducing: the Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation

From studies of demographic change and urban land-use planning to construction approvals and nature and architectural conserva- tion, the Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation oversees an enormous range of issues. Around 800 members of staff take care of a diverse range of different tasks.

The Urban Development Planning section develops prospects for the future of our city within the framework of the Perspektive München urban deve- lopment concept, as well as planning for potential future land use and trans- port developments in the city. Using analyses and forecasts, concepts and strategies, plans and action programmes, as well as conducting active public relations work, it works to maintain, secure and further enhance Munich’s standing both as a place to live and as a place to do business. Its objectives are to create a united urban community, future-ready settlement structures and a city-friendly approach to traffic, with reduced travel distances. Collabo- ration with nearby towns and communities, as well as neighbouring regions and actors from the fields of business, culture and social affairs, is also of vital importance.

The Urban Planning section continues a long-standing tradition spanning from the first city expansion in 1800 to the first urban architecture competition of 1892, Theodor Fischer’s guidelines and rules for the city (the Generallinien- planung and Staffelbauordnung), through to the present day. Using framework

Members of management in discussion

6 plans as a basis, staff in this section ensure practical implementation of the stra- tegic urban development planning objectives. They safeguard organised archi- tectural development as part of construction and green space planning, ensure socially-appropriate use of land that serves the common good, provide a livea- ble environment and maintain the quality of the city, its nature and the surround- ing countryside.

As Bavaria’s largest awarding authority, the Urban Redevelopment and Hou- sing section promotes new construction and modernisation of affordable rental and freehold homes. It monitors and secures rents in social housing, over- sees the municipal housing associations GWG and Gewofag, and serves their tenants. Together with the Münchner Gesellschaft für Stadterneuerung – MGS, the Urban Redevelopment section ensures that problems relating to the city’s redevelopment areas are resolved, and secures the resulting structural improve- ments for the long term. The section’s work contributes significantly to the fact that Munich residents are supplied with homes they would be completely una- ble to obtain on the private housing market.

The Building Authority (Lokalbaukommission – LBK) is the largest building approval authority in Germany. With thousands of individual decisions and hours providing advice and consultancy, the Authority shares responsibility for the qual- ity of life of Munich’s residents and ensures that an orderly cityscape is main- tained, legal standards are observed and safety in the construction sector is ensured. The Lower Construction Regulatory Authority (Untere Bauaufsichtsbe- hörde), the Lower Nature Conservation Authority (Untere Naturschutzbehörde) and the Lower Monument Conservation Authority (Untere Denkmalschutzbe- hörde) are allocated to the Lokalbaukommission. It is therefore responsible for planning applications, planning approval processes, construction supervision, the conservation of nature and the countryside, trees and species, architectural con- servation, urban design and advertising facilities in Munich city areas. From 2012 to 2016, the Lokalbaukommission granted planning permission for over 41,000 residential units.

7 Redevelopment Strategies, concepts and programmes

Munich is attractive and continues to grow. By 2030, if not sooner, more than 1.8 million people will call the city home. Managing this expansion is a major challenge for the entire urban society.

How do we ensure that living standards are maintained? How should we combat the shortage of affordable accommodation? How can we solve the struggle for land? How do we avoid social polarisation? The urban development strategies, concepts and pro- grammes described in the following pages are designed to pro- vide answers to these issues. The City Council will deploy € 870 million for affordable and subsidised homes by the year 2021 as part of the “Wohnen in München VI” policy action pro- gramme. In addition, it will make € 250 million available to munici- pal housing associations as parts of a special programme to pro- vide subsidised homes.

However, a growing population not only requires more homes, but also needs additional infrastructure and open spaces. Where there is long-term residential development, there must also be a corre- sponding development in open spaces. Furthermore, growth does not end at the city limits. It will only be possible to counter the challenges ahead of us through collaboration with towns and com- munities in the region, municipal housing associations, co-opera- tives, other actors in the sector – not to forget local residents.

8 Wohnen in München VI The city’s housing policy action programme 01 Ensuring an adequate supply of affordable housing is the central challenge facing the Munich urban development policy. For more than 25 years, the foundation of the City’s approach has been the “Wohnen in München” housing policy action programme.

“Wohnen in München” is the most wide-ranging communal home-building fund- ing programme in Germany. In the sixth update to the programme, € 870 million of city funds will be deployed by 2021 to promote construction of subsidised and affordable housing. The current action programme came into force on 1 January 2017 and runs until the end of 2021.

The programme’s focus continues to be building new homes: instead of the previous figure of 3,500, from 2017 permission is to be given for 4,500 new homes per year. Combined with existing building consent, approximately 8,500 homes should be constructed per year, including 2,000 subsidised and afforda- ble homes.

Due to the exceptional situation in the housing market, the City Council will sup- port those seeking housing with income just above the threshold for state and communal support through “Konzeptioneller Mietwohnungsbau” (KMB), a con- ceptual rental housing plan. This measure, which was tested in a series of pilot projects, will be introduced with “Wohnen in München VI” on an ongoing basis, and should be more carefully tailored to specific target demographics in future. Commitments from developers and the lack of price competition means that land prices are reduced in the KMB scheme. In terms of awarding plots of city land, the concept tendering process is also set to be further developed as part of “Wohnen in München VI”.

With regard to building subsidised housing, the main focus is on rental housing for lower and middle income groups. Municipal programmes have been simpli- fied: in future, only the “Münchner Wohnungsbau” and the “München Modell” initiatives will be used. To ensure that 50 to 60 per cent of Munich households continue to be eligible, the income thresholds in the “München Modell” will also be raised. The aim is to maintain the so-called “Munich mix” into the future – which is to say, to provide a diverse and wide-ranging offer of housing for all income groups.

The special “Wohnen für Alle” programme should also accelerate home-building: the municipal housing association Gewofag con- structed 100 homes on the car park for the Dantebad swimming pool in only six months.

9 Perspektive München Zukunftsschau 2040+: three scenarios for urban development

02 The “Zukunftsschau München 2040” concept grapples with future issues facing urban development in Munich. On behalf of the City of Munich, the Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering IAO in Stuttgart has developed three future scenarios which describe Munich in the year 2040, with three different focusses. Politicians and planners will come to grips with the results of these scenarios in discussions with the public in 2017.

Scenario 1 describes a city that is consistently guided by issues of ecologi- cal and social sustainability and therefore undertakes an active role in shaping social and health-promoting living environments. Scenario 2 describes a city in which social differences and poverty increase significantly as a result of an economy characterised by increasingly assertive free market forces and digital- isation. Scenario 3 describes a city of contradictions. In this scenario, well-inte- grated neighbourhoods reside alongside problematic districts and, in between them, numerous vibrant and diverse districts, sometimes with significant immigrant populations, which also provide spaces for individual design free- dom and creativity. None of these scenarios will prove entirely accurate. How- ever, they should help the City Council to react to developments in a timely and appropriate manner.

The Perspektive München urban development concept The basis of the scenario discussion is Perspektive München, a strategic urban development concept for the City of Munich, which serves as a framework to guide the future development of Bavaria’s state capital. At present, Perspek- tive München comprises a guiding principle, four strategic guidelines, 16 the- matic guidelines, some 60 pilot projects and ten fields of action.

Three development scenarios for Munich: 1. Munich – neatly regulated; 2. Munich – fiercely competitive; 3. Munich – charmingly disorganised.

10 The “Stadt im Gleichgewicht” (City in Equilibrium) guiding principle concentrates the objectives and values of urban development in eight core statements. The fundamental aspects of the guiding principle are further substantiated in four strategic guidelines: “forward-looking and cooperative management”, “open and attractive atmosphere”, “supportive and committed city society” and “high-qual- ity and characteristic city spaces”.

These topics are then made more tangible in 16 thematic guidelines. They contain topic-specific target statements on almost all significant thematic areas in urban development, such as the economy, cityscapes, social affairs, mobility, education, health and ecology. In addition, a further thematic guideline called “digital transformation/smart city” is currently in development. The objec- tives formulated in the guidelines are underpinned and clearly illustrated by con- cepts, programmes and a whole range of measures and projects.

The ten urban development fields of action In the most recent update to the Perspektive München project, ten fields of action were defined. They are parts of the city which hold great potential for urban development, but also entail risks. As a result, integrated fields of action concepts need to be drawn up for these areas. These should specify the future urban development objectives for the respective areas, complemented by cor- responding strategies and measures. Work on the “Rund um den Ostbahn- hof – Ramersdorf – Giesing” field of action began as part of a pilot project. This involves a process of intensive exchange between administrative and political bodies, local actors and residents. Project activities includes walking tours of the district, thematic workshops and a large field of action forum. This pilot pro- ject is now set to be taken as a basis for the other fields of action. Building on the experiences to date, a policy resolution on implementation of this “fields of action” approach as a new instrument in urban planning should be adopted by the City Council in 2018.

One field of action is “Rund um Ostbahnhof – Ramersdorf – Giesing”. T his part of the city is currently undergoing a significant transformation, with redevelopment of the industrial Werksviertel, improvements to parking facilities and the redesign of Ram- ersdorf town centre. The core strategies were presented in November 2016 with the help of a large-scale model.

11 Long-term settlement development Three strategies for new residential areas

With its “Langfristige Siedlungsentwicklung” (Long-term settlement 03 development) project – abbreviated to LaSie – the City of Munich is seeking to find answers to a foreseeable shortage of living spaces. The concept has been examined by subject specialists – with positive results.

Densification, restructuring and development on the urban fringes are the three strategies of the LaSie project. The evaluation of related expert opin- ions shows that the qualified densification of residential settlements built in the 1950s to 1980s has significant potential to open up new living space in Munich. Naturally, social concerns and the quality of open spaces must be taken into consideration. A further component is the architectural development of Munich’s urban fringes, such as in Munich’s north-east. Coordination and collaboration with neighbouring communities is an important aspect of this. The restructuring of commercial planning permission into permission to build housing represents a key opportunity. The updates to this strategy include future development of areas where residential and commercial spaces co­exist in harmony.

The process instigated by the LaSie project has made an impact: from 2013 to 2016, planning permission was awarded for some 15,800 housing units, while over 33,800 homes were approved. In addition, the LaSie project has contri­ buted to a change in perspective. Analysis of the city’s markedly increasing population and a clear shortage of available development spaces has placed focus on tolerable building density and contributed to a shift in consciousness from all actors involved. The key details of many new construction projects The construction of the GWG residential have changed during the planning process – and considerably higher building settlement on Haldenseestraße in Ram- densities have been recorded. ersdorf-Perlach is an example of qualified densification. The construction design The dialogue surrounding long-term settlement development strategies will be competition in 2016 was won by Zillerplus continued at a congress in November 2017. The event foresees an exchange Architekten und Stadtplaner with Lex Ker- with international experts in the field. fers Landschaftsarchitekten (the image shows a visualisation of a courtyard).

12 Long-term open space development The new open space concept for Munich is under consideration

What role do open spaces play in a densely built-up city that con- 04 tinues to grow? What can open spaces be or become – and for whom? The “Freiraum München 2030” conceptual study has been created to grapple with such issues.

The “Freiraum München 2030” study forms the basis for long-term develop- ment of open spaces in Munich. The conceptual study was conducted by the Berlin architectural office Becker Giseke Mohren Richard (BGMR) in collabora- tion with Friedrich von Borries from Berlin and Freiraumstudio from Munich – in close cooperation with the City of Munich and complemented by numerous spe- cialist workshops. The study is divided into three topics – “open space & decel- eration”, “open space & densification” and “open space & transformation” – and uses a very broad definition of open space. From parks to roof-top gardens, from streets to temporary cultural areas – everything can be an open space, whether green or not. It also shows how potential open spaces could be used in many ways and several times, such as by “stacking” such spaces on top of buildings. The objective of long-term open space development is to secure and further develop these open spaces and their qualities in the Munich city area. In doing so, challenges such as climate change and shifting lifestyles are also taken into account.

The new open space concept has been discussed in and with the public since early 2016 – starting at the annual exhibition of the Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation, and since November 2016 as part of the “Freiraumzeit” initiative, which aims to make the objectives of the open space concept and the qualities of green spaces in Munich accessible to people and to the city. In doing so, emphasis has been placed on discovering and exploring dif- ferent places and topics – through walks around the areas, workshops, a trav- elling exhibition, temporary open space interventions and much more besides. Feedback and reaction from residents at these events is evaluated and inte- grated in proposals for the consideration of the City Council regarding key pro- As part of the “Freiraumzeit” initiative, jects to shape long-term open space development. interested residents can explore the Isar river with a telescope.

13 Munich and the surrounding region Tackling the challenges of the future together

Munich is not alone in its growth – many parts of the region around 05 the state capital are also expanding. Building affordable housing, dealing with increasing numbers of commuters, building schools, protecting open spaces – this is a task that requires collective action.

Collaboration with the surrounding region is more important than ever for the City of Munich. Indeed, many proven instruments already exist, from the Munich Regional Planning Association (Regionaler Planungsverband München) to voluntary working groups to the Munich European Metropolitan Region (Europäische Metropolregion München – EMM). Yet further steps are neces- sary. As a result, Mayor of Munich Dieter Reiter has established the “Regional Alliance for Housing Construction and Infrastructure” (Regionales Bündnis für Infrastruktur und Wohnungsbau). Building on events held in previous years, in 2017 he again invited delegates to the Regional Housing Construction Confer- ence (Regionale Wohnungsbaukonferenz) in Ebersberg.

In the course of previous conferences, attended by more than 400 representa- tives from the political and business spheres as well as associations and organ- isations, numerous projects were initiated – such as the “Busse nach Berlin” scheme. In November 2015, politicians and business representatives from the Munich Metropolitan Region travelled to Berlin to call for more support from Federal Minister of Transport, Alexander Dobrindt, and the Bavarian Minister of the Interior, Joachim Herrmann, to develop transport infrastructure and hous- ing construction. Their argument was that not only do structurally-weak areas require political support on a federal and state level to meet their challenges, but growing areas do as well. With regard to expanding transport infrastructure, Left: Buses to Berlin. The delegation from Herrmann and Dobrindt committed to construction of a second core S-Bahn the Munich Metropolitan Region before route, known as the second Stammstrecke, for Munich. departure outside Munich Town Hall. Right: The topic of “Affordable Living” was the Best practice examples, such as the “Raumordnerische Entwicklungskonzept focus of the 2016 Regional Housing Con- München Südwest” (Regional Planning Development Concept for Munich struction Conference, held in Munich’s Old South-West) can provide important impetus for the future. In this concept, the Town Hall. The most recent conference state capital Munich collaborated with seven communes in Würmtal to develop took place on 10 May 2017 in Ebersberg. a joint strategy on the areas of housing, work, mobility and open space.

14 Development programme for commercial spaces Prospective sites for business

Ensuring that Munich remains an attractive location for business is a key objective in urban development planning. The commercial 06 space development programme highlights sites of important pro- spective locations for business. The programme has now been updated.

This aims to ensure that the City of Munich continues to enjoy high employment and economic prosperity into the future. Appropriate and corresponding commer- cial locations are therefore required, in addition to retaining the mix of production, crafts and services from a wide range of sectors.

To provide business with the requisite level of planning security, the city has developed the Gewerbeflächenentwicklungsprogramm (Commercial Spaces Development Programme). However, since its adoption by the City Council in 2000, the range of commercial spaces has fallen substantially due to conflicts of use, increasing pressure for redevelopment and location-specific shortcomings. On the other hand, there are premises lying vacant.

This development should be addressed by the update to the Commercial Spaces Development Programme. It highlights proposals on new commercial develop- ments, securing existing spaces for the future and restructuring other commer- cial spaces. Among other objectives, the programme sets the target of creating 35 hectares of land by 2030, in particular for traditional industries. Structural con- cepts or framework plans are to be developed for the Neumarkter Straße, Perlach Süd, Kirschgelände and Deckelgelände commercial areas. In addition, the pro- gramme raises concepts for space-saving business and proposes the introduction of an area management body that also addresses issues of mobility. Possibilities of inter-commune commercial areas in the region surrounding Munich are also set to be explored. The objective is to ensure that Munich remains a secure place The Steinhausen commercial area has to do business, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises. seen considerable upheaval since the Süddeutscher Verlag printing centre The new approaches will be discussed with the fields of politics and business, was established there. In the update to and with the professional public, before the City Council decides on them. The the commercial area development pro- update to the Commercial Spaces Development Programme is a joint project gramme, approaches have also been of the Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation with the Munich developed to reinforce existing com- Department of Labor and Economic Development, which is responsible for pro- mercial areas. moting the economy.

15 Guidelines on planning and construction in the historic centre The ongoing conflict between tradition and change

The boom of construction and investment has made an imprint on 07 the Munich city centre. But how can Munich protect the quality of its historic “Altstadt” district despite its standing as a modern metropolis and a location for business? New guidelines propose answers to these issues.

With around 450 individual listed buildings, the Munich Altstadt district today boasts a cityscape developed over centuries and, despite significant damage incurred in wartime, retains its inimitable character. Since 1983, the district as a whole has been registered on the architectural conservation list. At the same time, the city centre has enjoyed a building and investment boom.

The role of responsible urban development is to retain positive urban design qualities while simultaneously enabling contemporary, high-quality and mod- ern development. Therefore, on behalf of the Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation, the former Guardian of Cultural Heritage Gert F. Goer- gens produced guidelines on planning and building in the Munich Altstadt ensemble. Based on 19 theories, Goergens developed “guard rails” to pre- serve the character of typical features such as façades, arcades, courtyards, public areas or the roofscape for the future. The Altstadt guidelines seek to promote sensitivity when dealing with this exceptional ensemble, and serve as a guide to developers and planning offices in construction projects.

In 2010, due to the significant pressure for change and the associated risk of an increasing loss of quality, a political discussion was instigated with the aim of retaining the architectonic quality of the Munich Altstadt ensemble. The inherent heterogeneity of the Altstadt made it legally impossible to issue a design statute. Instead, the decision was taken to produce guidelines to safe- guard the area’s overall quality.

In 2015, the Lower Architectural Conservation Authority (Untere Denkmal­ schutzbehörde) published a brochure, which is available free of charge from The roof landscape of the Munich Altstadt, the Building Authority. In addition to the 19 guidelines, this brochure presents with silhouettes of towers to the east. illustrative new construction and reconstruction measures in the Altstadt.

16 Planning and building culture Ensuring the quality of construction – an important task

Competitions, advisory bodies and the Commission for Urban 08 Design – the Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation uses a variety of instruments to effect a significant contribution to Munich building culture.

There is a rich tradition of construction competitions in Munich. They are an important instrument in ensuring quality in urban planning, open space design and architecture. Moreover, they promote a dialogue between stakeholders, ensure transparency in the planning process and foster a public discussion about planning and building. The City Council either provides prizes itself or does so in collaboration with investors. The spectrum of competitions spans from invi- tational contests with few participants to open, conceptual urban planning con- tests. In significant processes, the recommendations of local residents are taken into consideration, such as in the case of the former Bayernkaserne or Paulaner sites. Advisory bodies have proven successful in realising major competitions. The projects are assessed on the basis of planning guidelines and overarching planning concepts for the area.

The Commission for Urban Design The Commission for Urban Design (Kommission für Stadtgestaltung) is another established tool for ensuring building quality in Munich. This voluntary body was founded in its current form in 1970 and is composed of 27 members. In addition to the Mayor and the Head of Department of Urban Planning and Building Reg- ulation, it is made up of other representatives of the city administration, spe- cialists from other authorities, Guardians of Cultural Heritage, city councillors as well as ten freelance architects. Some of these architects are from other cities, ensuring that an external perspective is given. Generally speaking, the Commis- sion advises on proposals that would significantly alter the Munich cityscape. It cannot grant or revoke planning permission, and may only issue recommenda- tions.

Right: Competitive exhibitions are often held in the Department for Urban Planning and Building Regula- tion – including for the former Temmler site in Berg am Laim. First prize went to Hollwich Kushner Archi- tecture, New York. Left: An overview of completed builds is held in the building culture filing cabinet in the Lokalbaukommission.

17 A city in touch with its people Thinking, debating, planning – together

Planning-related public relations work and the dialogue with the 09 general public are key preconditions for sustainable urban develop- ment. Comprehensible and well-presented information is crucial: from printed brochures and newsletters to Twitter updates, and from exhibitions to specific events – the Department uses an array of methods to keep Munich residents informed of the latest plans, projects and developments. There are various points of contact where citizens can find answers to their queries.

A constant since 1995: PlanTreff The centrepiece of the Department of Urban Planning and Building Regula- tion’s public relations work is PlanTreff. The urban development information centre, located at Blumenstraße 31, was established in 1995 to create a loca- tion in the centre of Munich where the city’s urban development operations could be made more transparent for its residents. For the public, PlanTreff is the place to find out about important projects, topics and plans. Munich resi- dents can visit the many exhibitions and events held here to speak with spe- cialists and voice their ideas. Since 1999, an exhibition has been held at the start of each year in the Rathausgalerie on Marienplatz. Under the motto of “Zukunft findet Stadt”, the exhibitions feature a wide-ranging programme and present current topics and issues relating to urban development in Munich. The topics range from housing to architectural conservation to the Munich city- scape. Public interest in the exhibition continues to grow: 15,700 people vis- Exhibitions held in the Rathausgalerie and the ited the 2017 edition of the annual exhibition, entitled “Mehr Wohnen”, and left PlanTreff centre, as well as events like the urban 200 comments. All in all, this year saw six evening events, a workshop for chil- building culture talk series, are important com- dren and young people, six guided city walks and a total of 30 tours of the ponents of planning-related public relations exhibition. work.

18 From the classic exhibition to the modern “Smart Slam” In addition, exhibitions are held on a variety of topics in the PlanTreff centre, in the high-rise building at Blumenstraße 28b and in the Building Authority’s service centre. An annual schools’ urban development competition is also held to intro- duce children and young people to issues of architecture and urban planning. The Head of Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation, Elisabeth Merk, also regularly invites people from a range of backgrounds and professions and with differing opinions to a talk series to discuss current challenges. Compara- tively new features in the public relations programme include the “Smart Slam”, a quick-fire contest of short presentations based on the concept of poetry slams, and “PlanTreff vor Ort”, a series of walks around Munich to take in and discuss ongoing projects.

A new form of civic engagement Events such as these are crucial – and not only because a growing number of residents are seeking to play an active role in planning processes. In fact, inform- ing citizens, allowing them to participate and engaging them in the planning pro- cess early on facilitates greater acceptance and better results, in the sense of achieving more sustainable urban development. For these reasons, we are also using more informal civil participation formats, such as workshops or resi- dents’ panels, in addition to the legally-prescribed consultation and engagement process. The Internet is the best method of keeping people in the loop: new updates are posted daily on muenchen.de/plan, muenchen-mitdenken.de and Twitter. The Department also releases a quarterly newsletter on current topics.

Point of contact for planning permission queries Right: The central point of contact for questions For any general questions on planning and building permission, the Building concerning planning permission is the Building Authority’s service centre at Blumenstraße 19 is the place to go. Even before a Authority’s service centre. Left: At the 2015 edi- planning application is submitted, citizens can use the centre for advice – in per- tion of the annual exhibition, visitors could voice son or by telephone, without having to arrange an appointment. their opinions and leave comments on the development of Munich city centre.

19 Smart Munich Smarter Together, City2Share and a new guideline 10 The Smart City is an important topic for the city of Munich: with a range of projects and a new guideline on digital transformation, the city administration is rising to the challenges of the future.

In September 2015, the European Union selected Munich, along with Lyon and Vienna, to test out landmark, future-oriented Smart City solutions as part of the “Smarter Together” project. Taking into account funding from business and research, € 20 million will be deployed in Neuaubing-Westkreuz and Freiham by the year 2020. State-of-the-art technologies for the “district of the future” are to be tested at these sites, and could serve as a model for future devel- opments. Trials are to be conducted in three areas: mobility, technology and energy. Measures to be enacted range from energy-oriented refurbishments to intelligent street lights to car sharing systems. Active participation of local residents is also an important component: they will be able to collaborate with project partners from the fields of industry and research to develop solutions in numerous “Stadtteillaboren”, or district workshops.

The objectives of the “City2Share” research project can be summarised as follows: less traffic with reduced emissions for enhanced quality of life with improved mobility. In the Sendling and Isarvorstadt districts, a consortium made up of private enterprises, public authorities and research institutions will investigate the efficacy of new concepts over the coming years in rela- tion to e-mobility. One particular focus of this initiative is developing and tri- alling an innovative sharing system with partially autonomous electric cars and inductive charging stations, as well as integrating pedelecs in the existing rental bicycle system. A new, ecological inner-city delivery concept is also to be developed and trialled on the basis of electric cargo bicycles – again involv- ing local residents.

Following the new “Digital Transformation Smart City” guideline, such techni- cal developments are integrated in the Perspektive München urban develop- ment concept.

Munich’s first “Stadtteillabor” was opened in Neuaubing-Westkreuz in 2016. The Smart City represents future-ready urban development in the very broadest sense, connecting urban planning with technology, research, communication, social affairs and business. Sustainability is also a key aspect.

20 Plans and projects for more housing

Space to build housing is in short supply in Munich. As a result, it is crucial that potential sites are developed. This might happen when businesses move to the outskirts of the city and leave their production premises, such as in the examples of the Paulaner brewery or in the Werksviertel. Or, this might involve develop- ments on the city’s fringes, such as in Freiham or in Munich’s north-east, which hold the city’s last remaining large expanses of continuous undeveloped land.

Redevelopments have always been a key motor for urban develop- ment in Munich. Following the end of the Cold War and the reforms to the German Armed Forces, numerous military barracks were vacated over time, such as the Funkkaserne and the Prinz- Eugen-Kaserne. This is not to forget the considerable amount of land reclaimed from the rail system, such as on Paul-Gerhardt- Allee. A number of residential areas have since been created.

The process of transforming a used site into a residential area depends on the ownership circumstances as well as the site’s location, size, context and history. Sometimes the first step is a structural concept, while other projects start with a competition. No matter how similar individual planning and implementation stages might be, the involvement of local citizens plays an increas- ingly important role – particularly when it comes to creating highly liveable neighbourhoods with high-quality open space structures that offer a diverse range of housing for all Munich residents.

21 Freiham An inclusive district for around 25,000 residents 11 In western Munich, on one of the final connected spaces within the city boundaries, a new urban district is under construction. Eventu- ally, around 25,000 residents will call the area home, while 7,500 persons will work here. As well as housing and commercial areas, public spaces and green areas, shops and social institutions are set to be created – as well as Munich’s largest education and sports campus and a generous nature park. The district will be constructed in stages by the year 2040 – following the principle of inclusivity.

Project information The city’s new district, Freiham, is around the size of 250 football fields and Freiham overall is divided into two areas: the commercial site south of Bodenseestraße has Size: 350 hectares been under construction since 2005. The Freiham Nord residential area is to be constructed in two stages. While an international urban and landscape plan- Freiham Nord ning competition has been running since the summer of 2017 for the second Size 190 hectares realisation phase (57 hectares, 5,000 to 6,000 housing units), the first realisa- Residents: 25,000 tion phase commenced in practice in 2016. In this stage, 4,400 homes will be created for 11,000 residents over 85 hectares. The spectrum of housing to be built spans from multi-storey residential housing to housing cooperatives and mixed housing types. Subsidised housing (for rent and for sale) will account for around 50 per cent.

Two building projects in the leading role The heart of the new residential area will be at the district’s centre: the munici- pal housing association Gewofag is to build facilities for a district cultural cen- tre, along with a municipal library, a family and health advice centre, a training centre, two childcare centres and 240 homes. The realisation contest was awarded in 2016, and construction should begin in 2018. To the north, another municipal housing association, GWG, is to construct 170 homes, two childcare centres and a community meeting centre. Unusually, the project tasks have been divided between two architectural offices, who were both awarded joint second place in the realisation competition. These construction projects are the first in Freiham Nord, and will play a pioneering role for the entire district. It is hoped that the first residents will be able to move in from 2020.

Inclusive spaces to live and work Munich’s new district should not only be vibrant, diverse and ecologically sus- tainable, but also inclusive. That means that everyone must be equally able to access and participate in communal areas – including elderly citizens and peo- ple with disabilities. To make this objective a reality, the planners in the Depart- ment of Urban Planning and Building Regulation have worked together with specialists and other relevant parties to formulate a series of recommenda- tions for action in nine topic areas: urban planning; homes/living; mobility and public spaces; local supply; leisure and recreation; social affairs and culture; health; education, and work. The recommendations range from public signage systems for different perceptual patterns to low-contrast lighting systems, and from inclusive leisure activities to a network of short routes. These were given directly to the developers and architects. The Free State of Bavaria provided financial support to the project.

22 The winning design for the Gewofag buildings in the centre of the Freiham Nord district was drawn up by AllesWirdGut Architektur mit DnD Landschaftsarchitekten, Vienna.

In the realisation competition for the GWG project, two parties were awarded joint second place: both Dressler May- The framework plan is based on the idea of gentle erhofer Rössler Architekten und Stadtplaner with Terra.nova Landschaftsarchitekten and Felix + Jonas Architekten construction: Freiham Nord is connected to the with Mahl Gebhard Konzepte Landschaftsarchitekten won the award (in bottom image). The two Munich architect settlement boundary of Neuaubing to the east by a offices are collaborating and sharing project tasks. strip of grassland. The western edge of the new district features a large nature park, approximately 55 hectares in size. To the north, the area neigh- bours the rural settlement of Aubing.

23 Munich’s north-east Planning for the future: three variants for development 12 Munich’s north-east still has a significant amount of land available. Apart from the new district of Freiham, the area to the east of the S-Bahn line 8 to the airport holds the greatest potential for future residential and landscape development in Munich. On the approxi- mately 600 hectares available here, several new districts could be built in the decades to come, creating homes for a total of 30,000 people and generating 10,000 jobs. The Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation has developed three vari- ants for development of this land. A public discussion on the pro- posals was held in early 2017.

Project information In a four-week-long exhibition, numerous workshops, a symposium, events for Size: 595 hectares property owners and a youth conference, the Department’s three variants were Residents: 30,000 discussed intensively with the public. Munich residents were very keen to take the opportunity to give the planners feedback on their proposals: all three var- iants were discussed in detail in regards to their qualities concerning housing and commerce, culture and agriculture, education and sport, green space and recreation, transport, emissions and regional networking. The density of any future developments was one of the central topics of discussion. Alongside con- cerns about the area’s identity, productive agriculture and open countryside, many citizens see combating the additional traffic as a major challenge.

Debate welcome The affected district committees were also heavily engaged in the discussions. In a five-hour symposium entitled “Blick über den Tellerrand”, experts stemming from Freiburg, Kloten near Zurich and Fredrikssund – located to the west of Copenhagen – presented their visions and approaches for the residential areas, as well as for the interaction between urban and rural areas. The comments and reactions from residents will be integrated in further plans.

24 The area where development is planned is currently rather rural. It is situated in the municipal districts of Bogenhausen and Trudering-Riem. Due to the rapid population growth in Munich, the construction of new homes in this area is urgently required. In order to conduct exploratory planning work without causing the price of the land to be developed to be influenced through speculation, the city conducted preparatory investigations with a view to future urban develop- ment measures several years ago.

S-Bahn tunnel between Johanneskirchen and Daglfing Another topic relating to settlement developments in Munich’s north-east is the four-track expansion of the route of the S-Bahn line 8 to Munich airport between Johanneskirchen, Englschalking and Daglfing. While Deutsche Bahn currently plans to conduct this expansion at ground level, the City of Munich would pre- fer a tunnel – for noise protection reasons, but also in order to enhance the spa- tial connections of the districts lying to the east and west of the S-Bahn line. As a result, the City has contributed financially to the preliminary surveys, which are to be carried out by Deutsche Bahn.

Exhibition with a workshop character: In the former Siemens canteen, citizens had the chance to visualise their ideas for Munich’s north-east using wooden blocks.

25 The former Bayernkaserne site Transforming former barracks into a residential area

The site of the former Bayernkaserne military base and a neighbour- 13 ing piece of land are set to become an urban district with 5,000 homes, open spaces and social infrastructure planned. The first resi- dents should provisionally move in from 2021.

Project information At 48 hectares, the site of the old barracks in Freimann – in municipal ownership Size: 58 hectares since 2011 – holds enormous potential for the overstretched housing market. The Residents: 15,000 former military facility and the ten-hectare commercial site at Heidemannstraße 164 that neighbours the barracks to the east are now the subject of development plans.

As well as housing, childcare centres, two school campuses with sports facilities, social institutions such as a senior citizen’s centre, a community centre, a branch of the Münchner Volkshochschule, a large supermarket and further shops are planned for the area. Additional aspects include public and private open spaces: a munici- pal park, two generous green areas in the north and south of the development, a green boulevard running from east to west with footpaths and cycle paths, as well as communal roof gardens and courtyards. There are also plans to extend tram line 23 through the area along a thoroughfare. A fire station is also planned for Heide- mannstraße.

The foundation for the plans is an urban and landscape planning contest, which concluded in 2014. The winning concept draws on the European city model and plans to create clearly-structured construction sites in a network of perpendicular streets. The centre of the district will see a town square composed of numerous buildings of around 60 metres tall.

It is hoped that the district will be realised in accordance with the “Munich mix” – with rental and freehold homes for as many different income groups as possible. Between 20% and 40% of planning permission is intended for joint building ven- Left: Entry to the Bayernkaserne was once tures and cooperatives. Individual realisation competitions will be held for public strictly controlled. Right: The winning concept, buildings such as schools and for significant housing areas. by architectural offices Max Dudler (Berlin), Hilmer & Sattler und Albrecht (Munich) and the The special aspect of this planning process was the early integration of the public landscape architect Adelheid Schönborn (Muhr – indeed, even before the competition outcome had been decided. Sustainability am See). aspects were also carefully considered in the urban development concept.

26 Paul-Gerhardt-Allee The final section of the Zentrale Bahnflächen area is under development

The 33 hectare planning area in Pasing-Obermenzing is the final 14 section of Zentrale Bahnflächen area that is yet to be developed. What was once an industrial zone will become an area where 5,500 people will live and approximately 800 will work.

Project information Around 2,400 homes are set to be built in the triangular junction between Paul- Size: 33 hectares Gerhardt-Allee, Bärmannstraße and the two railway lines. Development plans Residents: 5,500 also include a five-grade primary school with a sports hall, five day-care facilities, almost ten hectares of public green spaces and shops that should also benefit other nearby residential areas. An orbital footpath and cycle path in the planned landscape park should connect the new district with Pasing rail station, tram line 19 and the parks surrounding Nymphenburg Palace. The City Council approved three new combined pedestrian and bicycle bridges to this effect in 2014. The listed Eggenfabrik building is to be retained and converted for use as a popular sports centre.

In December 2014, the City Council approved the development plans. The land is divided into twelve construction areas, with a realisation competition planned for each individual area. Nine of these contests should be completed by late 2017. The overall plans are based on an urban and landscape planning competi- tion that concluded in 2011. The winning design, created by Munich firms Palais Mai Architekten and Lohrer.Hochrein Landschaftsarchitekten, features polygonal courtyard developments. A landscape park is to be created between the court- yard developments and the railway lines. Sound barriers and protection walls will protect the area from railway noise. A town square is planned on Paul-Gerhardt- Allee, with a second square in the east of the district providing balance.

Left: The realisation competition for Construc- Construction work has already begun. The year 2018 should see the first resi- tion Area WA6 was won by Munich firms Meck dents move in. As the commercial zone is being re-purposed, the area will have Architekten and Studio B Landschaftsarchitek- to contend with less heavy-duty traffic. tur. Right: Living, shopping and relaxing – the western edge of the district will see a striking building complex with 160 homes and large retailers, following the plans of Munich firms Allmann Sattler Wappner Architekten and Real- grün Landschaftsarchitekten.

27 Prinz-Eugen-Park Lighthouse ecological settlement project using wooden construction

On the site of the former Prinz-Eugen-Kaserne military barracks, a 15 new urban area with 1,800 homes will be built from 2017, and serve as a role model for all of Munich: numerous actors have collaborated both in its planning and construction. An ecological model settle- ment sets a new benchmark.

Project information The new Prinz-Eugen-Park in Bogenhausen should be a vibrant, highly-liveable Prinz-Eugen-Park (overall) district. As a result, engaging future residents in its development from the very Size: 30 hectares beginning was vital. High value has also been attached to issues such as commu- Residents: 4,000 nity facilities, living with a reduced number of cars, good local transport links and network neighbourhoods. The municipal housing associations Gewofag and GWG Ecological model settlement have joined forces with housing cooperatives, community building ventures and Size: 5 hectares autonomous developers to form a consortium, and intend to build housing units Residents: 1,200 and social facilities on the land. The Jewish Community of Munich (Israelitische Kultusgemeinde) is also involved in the project to provide housing for senior citi- zens. This mix of various actors, housing types, projects and funding programmes has created housing to cater for a range of income and age groups.

With the ecological model settlement in the south of the development, the City of Munich is seeking to set a new benchmark in terms of climate protection and sustainable urban development. A range of building types will be built using tim- ber construction, up to seven-storey housing blocks. Comprising around 480 homes, this will be the largest coherent wooden settlement in Germany. The City has established a specific funding programme to support the project. The model settlement should be completed in 2019.

Habitats, old trees and green meadows shape the Prinz-Eugen-Park. The cen- tre of the park will see a lively square with shops and restaurants. Further trade and service spaces are set to appear on the Cosimastraße. This will be comple- mented by six nursery schools, one primary school and a community and cultural centre. The district will be embedded in parkland traversed by a network of walk- ways and cycle paths.

The development plan was approved in 2013. The basis for this was an urban and landscape planning competition won by the Munich firms GSP Architekten and Rainer Schmidt Landschaftsarchitekten. A subsequent realisation competition and advisory bodies helped to flesh out the development.

The municipal housing association GWG is con- structing a complex with 57 homes and a chil- dren’s centre as part of the ecological model settlement on Jörg-Hube-Straße, in accordance with the plans of the bidding consortium made up of Rapp Architekten with Müllerblaustein and Brüggemann. It is set to be completed in 2019.

28 Domagkpark New residential space for families, students and apprentices

Barracks, refugee accommodation, an artists’ commune, a police 16 station – the site of the former Funkkaserne military base has seen diverse uses over the years. Another chapter is about to start: by 2018, it will become the location of a new district of Munich.

Project information Child and family-friendly with numerous open spaces and varied architecture – Size: 24 hectares these are the plans for the Domagkpark in the north of Schwabing. On the site Residents: 4,000 of the former Funkkaserne barracks, 1,800 homes – half of them subsidised – are currently under construction. In addition, a primary school, a hotel, a super- market, shops and restaurants will be built around the Bauhausplatz to form the centre of the new district. The area will also feature four day-care centres, a nurs- ing centre for senior citizens and a community centre, and also provide 500 jobs. One integral element is the studio house for 140 artists and creatives in the for- mer Haus 50, which has been successfully retained and represents the area’s heritage.

Joint building ventures and cooperatives showed great interest in the district’s development from the very beginning. They proposed innovative concepts to develop the land and formed a consortium along with housing companies and developers. Their objective is to network the parties involved and form a shared approach to create a highly-liveable, lively district with short travel routes. The 15 buildings to be constructed by the six joint building ventures will contribute to the area’s considerable architectonic diversity. Beyond that, a mobility con- cept designed to meet the requirements of the district’s future residents has been jointly developed: facilities for electric cars, car-sharing systems and rental bike stations will reduce the need for car parking spaces. A range of community spaces, from a visitors’ apartment to a workshop, encouraged social cohesion in the area.

The jewel in the crown of the new urban district is its large park, which can be reached using the new tram line 23. It divides the area into northern and south- ern residential areas, and is bordered by staggered, standalone buildings. A closed noise protection development will be built along the Frankfurter Ring to the north; U-shaped houses will be built in the south, while the east of the district will see alternative housing types. The basis for the plans was an urban and landscape planning concept contest, which was won in 2002 by the Berlin firms Ortner & Ortner Baukunst and Topotek 1 Landschaftsarchitekten.

The wagnisART residential development, cre- ated by the wagnis eG cooperative, in 2016 won the award Deutscher Städtebaupreis.

29 Paulaner site Three new residential areas on the Nockherberg

The Paulaner Brewery has relocated its production and logistics 17 operations from the city centre to Langwied, on Munich’s outskirts. By 2023, the former brewing site should be home to a new, sustain- able residential district. Only Paulaner’s administrative staff will remain.

Project information The area on the Nockherberg in the Au district will see construction of around Size: 9 hectares 1,500 new homes, 30% of them subsidised, along with several day-care facili- Residents: 3,500 ties, a community centre, shops, restaurants and a 16,000 square metre park. A network of walkways and cycle paths will also provide access to the entire area. A new primary school will be built nearby at Hochstraße 31, and is expected to open its doors in 2019.

The foundation for the plans is an urban and landscape planning contest, which concluded in 2013. The designs for the Regerstraße sub-area (5.1 hectares) have been drawn up by the Amsterdam firm Rapp+Rapp with Atelier Quadrat from Rotterdam, while the Ohlmüllerstraße sub-area (1.7 hectares) is in the hands of Munich firm Steidle Architekten with Atelier Auböck+Kárász from Vienna. For the Welfenstraße area (2.3 hectares), the London-based firm Caruso St John Archi- tects with Vogt Landschaftsarchitekten from Zurich were awarded first prize. The general public was closely involved in the competition process – with events held before prizes had been awarded. A design advisory board, which includes mem- bers of the district committee, will continue to accompany the project. The devel- opment plan was approved in February 2016.

A separate realisation competition was held for the Paulaner administration building on Ohlmüllerstraße, which will be the workplace for 250 employees. In the plans created by the Munich firms Hierl Architekten and Koeber Land- schaftsarchitekten, a new building is to be constructed that integrates the listed Zacherlbau and Linde-Eismaschine buildings on Auer Mühlbach. The Zacherl- bau was renovated in close collaboration with the Lower Architectural Conserva- tion Authority (Untere Denkmalschutzbehörde) and the Bavarian State Office for Architectural Conservation (Landesamt für Denkmalpflege). Carl von Linde’s Eis- maschine, also a listed building under architectural conservation protection, was also integrated in the new concept.

Laying the foundation stone for the Welfengar- ten (from left): Dr. Jürgen Büllesbach, Chairman of the Board of Bayerische Hausbau; Prof. Dr.(I) Elisabeth Merk, Head of Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation; and Dr. Her- mann Brandstetter, Managing Director at Bayer- ische Hausbau.

30 Werksviertel A new district with a rich heritage by Ostbahnhof

A site where companies such as Pfanni, Zündapp and Optimol 18 once had their production sites and which saw revellers party into the early hours will soon house 2,630 people and provide work for 12,600. The area will also feature a new concert hall.

Project information Following the guiding principle of “compact, urban, green”, one of the last remain- Size: 38 hectares ing large expanses of continuous undeveloped land close to the city centre will Residents: 2,630 become a vibrant district with homes, jobs, services, culture and leisure.

The heart of the new district is a 1.3 hectare park, surrounded by 1,150 homes in block perimeter development, with 30% of this housing subsidised. The buildings have five to six floors, green courtyards, and are protected from street and train noise by the nearby commercial and business areas. Buildings between 60 to 80 metres high will also add occasional urban architectural accents. A youth centre, three day-care facilities and a primary school are also planned.

The juxtaposition of old industrial halls and modern architecture gives the new district an unmistakeable character. The former silos, Werk 1 and Werk 3, the Ton- halle and the old Pfanni canteen have been retained to preserve a sense of the district’s former identity. Today, the silos house a climbing hall, while Werk 3 fea- tures studio, exhibition and storage spaces. Werk 1 is home to a series of start- ups, and a restaurant has been set up in the former Pfanni canteen. The buildings will be refurbished, expanded and supplemented with additional uses, such as hotels, sports facilities or apartments. A shopping centre will be built to the north of Grafinger Straße. The media centre on Rosenheimer Straße is set to be expanded. In total, the district will feature seven hectares of green areas and open spaces. Green walkways and cycle paths as well as a new Medienstraße should render the previously hermetically-sealed commercial district more open and accessible. In the heart of the Werksviertel, directly by the park, a new con- cert hall is to be constructed – and will become the new home of the Bavarian Radio Symphony Orchestra (Symphonieorchester des Bayerischen Rundfunks).

The basis of the development planning concept is a structural concept developed by the office of Steidle Architekten in coordination with Freiraum Landschafts­ architekten.

The view of Werk 3 and Medienbrücke from Ostbahnhof.

31 Am Südpark Housing on the former E.on site

A new district with 1,100 homes is under development on Boschets­ rieder Straße, at the corner of Drygalski-Allee. It is hoped that the 19 first residents will be able to move in from 2018. Roof gardens and terraces will also ensure the district features green accents.

Project information The planning area is directly adjacent to the former thermal power station in Size: 8 hectares Obersendling. In the early 1990s, the former Isar-Amperwerke, nowadays Residents: 2,500 E.on, intended to build its group headquarters there. However, the plans were eventually shelved, as was the idea of building a shopping centre on the site. Instead, a new settlement with homes for 2,500 residents and jobs for 400 people is to be built. The design envisages three interlocking residential blocks with six to eight floors, and which are oriented towards Drygalski-Allee, Boschets­ rieder Straße and Kistlerhofstraße. A quiet central park will be integrated in the area by connecting green spaces and walkways. Green spaces and open areas will stretch out between the housing blocks. The edges of the blocks will shield the residential area against the noise from nearby streets and busi- nesses. The homes are oriented towards the park and the private courtyards. A comprehensive range of communally-accessible roof gardens and terraces are set to be created on top of the buildings.

Along with freehold properties, rental housing is also planned, much of it sub- sidised. Three new day-care facilities will also be integrated in the courtyards. A commercial building with space for offices, retailers and everyday service providers is planned for Kistlerhofstraße, as well as accommodation for stu- dents and apprentices. The district is connected via the neighbouring main roads, while the next U-Bahn station is on Machtlfingerstraße.

The basis for the development plans is taken from an urban and landscape planning competition, which was completed in 2013 following intensive involvement of the general public. The winning design was created by the Zurich-based offices of Von Ballmoos Krucker and Schweingruber Zulauf Land- schaftsarchitekten (today called Studio Vulkan, Zurich). To ensure the archi- tectonic quality of the development, an advisory body composed of political representatives and specialists monitors the planning process.

A visualisation of the “Boschenplatz” area at the corner of Boschetsrieder Straße and Drygal- ski Allee, presented at the advisory body on 24 September 2014 by 03 Architekten, Munich.

32 Kreativquartier Urban living amongst art and culture on Dachauer Straße

Munich is breaking the mould in the development of the former 20 Luitpoldkaserne barracks and surrounding areas: an urban district is set to be built on Dachauer Straße, and will see living and work- ing closely intermeshed with art, culture and academia.

Project information Creativity is theme of this new district. Four connected sub-areas are planned: Size: 20 hectares Kreativpark, Kreativplattform, Kreativfeld and Kreativlabor. The vibrant art and cul- Residents: 2,000 ture scene that has developed in the north of the area should help to create a cohesive identity for the district.

In late 2016, the City Council approved the first of three development plans: the Kreativfeld sub-area on Schwere-Reiter-Straße will see construction of a five- grade primary school, along with 385 homes and a centre for children with four toddler and nursery groups. In the next block, the Kreativlabor sub-area on Leon- rodplatz, the plans foresee an urban mix of art, culture, creative industries, hous- ing, social facilities, another day-care centre, businesses and retail outlets in old and new buildings alike. At the heart of the new district is the Kreativpark. This public space combines Heßstraße with Dachauer Straße. This area also features two listed industrial buildings, the Jutierhalle and Tonnenhalle, which are vacant at present and should be used in future for cultural purposes and the creative industry. A start-up and innovation centre is envisaged to the south-west of the Tonnenhalle. The Kreativplattform area is also connected to the south. This area will see the University of Applied Sciences Munich (Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften) expand with a northern campus. In addition, new buildings comprising around 395 homes and a third day-care centre are also planned.

Plans for the development stem from the recently-established architectural firms Teleinternetcafe (Berlin) and TH Treibhaus (Hamburg), who in 2012 were crowned winners of the urban and landscape planning concept competition. Their design was awarded the Deubau-Preis 2016. Left: The four areas are connected, but can also be developed independently of one another. The participation of the general public is vital in the development of this creative Right: A potential impression of how the Krea- district. Numerous events have already been held. tivlabor sub-area might look, according to the plans created by the firms Teleinternetcafe and TH Treibhaus.

33 Infrastructure and public space

More than 1.5 million people live in Munich; 360,000 more com- mute into the state capital from its environs every day. They all want to commute, live, work, shop and enjoy the culture of the city – and ideally without noise and air pollution.

The major challenge is meeting all of these demands and expecta- tions of a mobile and future-oriented city while also ensuring that it remains highly liveable. This means securing the mobility of resi- dents, commuters and commercial traffic on the one hand, while simultaneously keeping noise and air pollution from transport as low as possible. It is also important to make public space available for transport and traffic, as well as ensuring that Munich’s public spaces remain an attractive place for people to meet and live.

The Verkehrsentwicklungsplan (Munich Transport Development Plan) provides the framework for further development of transport infrastructure. One objective is to expand the options, so that more journeys can be made easily on foot. Furthermore, cycling should also be promoted alongside public transport as a city- friendly, emission-free and healthy mode of transport. This was affirmed in the “Radverkehr in München” decision of principle, adopted in 2009. The proposed steps to expand the U-Bahn, tram and bus services are detailed in the Nahverkehrsplan (Regional Public Transport Plan). This is currently being updated.

34 Sendlinger Straße Extended pedestrian zone being trialled

On 1 July 2016, Sendlinger Straße became an exclusively pedestrian zone for one year. This should decisively improve conditions for resi- 21 dents in the southern part. Comprehensive investigations were con- ducted during the test phase.

The idea of pedestrianising Sendlinger Straße has been discussed for over 30 years. The new development between Färbergraben and Hackenstraße has changed the local environment considerably. As a result, the northern section of Sendlinger Straße has been a pedestrian zone since 2013. Following posi- tive feedback on this initiative, the pedestrianisation of the southern part is now under discussion.

From 1 July 2016, a series of specialist studies were conducted to assess the ramifications of the pedestrian zone for residents’ quality of life, the interaction between transport users and commercial activity. A self-commissioned office conducted site visits and surveys and held events to gather feedback from resi- dents, local doctors and business people in the area. Furthermore, a complaints hotline was created which local residents made lively use of. The City of Munich started a traffic census and monitored parking behaviour.

From July 2016 to February 2017, several hundred pieces of feedback were received. The interim conclusion: the traffic experiment was largely posi- tively received. Passers-by and local residents now spend more time in Send- linger Straße and cherish their newly-acquired peace and quiet with little traffic. However, local businesspeople are more critical of a potential expansion of the pedestrian zone. They would like their delivery times to be extended, an issue under consideration by the Department of Public Security and Order (Kreisverwaltungsref­erat). Moreover, arrangements for cyclists in the area around Sendlinger-Tor-Platz and Herzog-Wilhelm-Straße towards Oberanger requires improvement. Alternatively, Sendlinger Straße could be opened to cyclists. The issue of parking also needs further clarification.

Following the one-year test phase, the City Council will decide on the eventual restructuring of the popular shopping street.

35 The new Munich Central Station The course is set

Munich is gaining a new central rail station: reception halls, the 22 Starnberger Flügelbahnhof and its forecourts are all set to be redesigned. The revised designs from the Munich-based office of Auer Weber Architekten, who in 2006 were announced as win- ners of the urban planning concept and realisation competition, formed the basis for this development. The planning work is closely integrated with construction of the second core S-Bahn route, or Stammstrecke. The official groundbreaking ceremony for the Stammstrecke was held on 5 April 2017 at Marienhof.

In 2015, Munich City Council gave Deutsche Bahn the green light to redevelop the Central Station (Hauptbahnhof) in accordance with the revised designs of Auer Weber Architekten. The entrance hall will be replaced by a modern ter- minal-style building. A new building with a high tower will be constructed on the site of the old Starnberger Flügelbahnhof, the wing station to the north of the main terminus. The new Hauptbahnhof will not only be better connected to the historic city centre thanks to a pedestrian zone, and will also be better integrated in the surrounding district. Moreover, the development also repre- A visualisation of the Hauptbahnhof forecourt sents the completion of the new residential settlements on the Zentrale Bahn- with the new entrance building. flächen area.

36 The new development also offers the opportunity to restructure traffic routes around the Hauptbahnhof and to redesign the various forecourts and the large Bahnhofplatz in front of the station. A conceptual study with different variants was created for this purpose. The core of the project is to enhance the station’s squares, to facilitate better pedestrian access to the city centre and to improve connections between local and long-distance travel (by rail, tram and bus). Sug- gestions for Bahnhofplatz, in front of the station, include a generous relaxation area with trees, seating areas and uniform surfacing – a key request of resi- dents in the south of the rail station district. Münchner Verkehrsgesellschaft, the municipally-owned company responsible for the city’s public transport, would also like to add a third tram platform on Bahnhofplatz.

The Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation is using an in-depth transportation concept to examine the development of the rail station, the con- trol of transit traffic and how to keep bicycle traffic separate from pedestrians.

The second Stammstrecke The redevelopment of the Hauptbahnhof is closely linked to construction of the second core S-Bahn route, or Stammstrecke. The tunnel, commissioned by the Free State of Bavaria and planned by Deutsche Bahn is, in the view of the City Council, absolutely essential to significantly improve the Munich’s S-Bahn sys- tem. The new tunnel should complement the existing S-Bahn Stammstrecke and, at a depth of 35 to 40 metres, serve the stations at Laim, Hauptbahn- hof, Marienhof and Ostbahnhof. Preparatory construction work began in Octo- ber 2016. Deutsche Bahn expects construction work to last well over nine years, with the second Stammstrecke provisionally coming into service in 2026.

U9 bypass route A new U-Bahn line from Implerstraße via Hauptbahnhof to Münchner Freiheit station could further relieve commuter congestion along the city’s north-south axis: the so-called U9-Entlastungsspange, or bypass route. A study commis- sioned by Stadtwerke München and the Münchner Verkehrsgesellschaft shows that, from a construction perspective, this route is fundamentally realisable. The study is particularly in-depth in the area around the Hauptbahnhof, and a rough cost estimation is to be produced. Exploratory work is ongoing.

The planned route of the second Stammstrecke – red line: overground; dotted red line: under- ground.

37 Mittlerer Ring action programme Three sections of the ring are under consideration 23 With up to 145,000 vehicles per day, the Mittlere Ring around Munich’s city centre is the city’s most congested main road. The sections along Landshuter Allee and Tegernseer Landstraße are exposed to particularly high levels of noise and air pollution. These urban areas are heavily populated, and are bisected by the ring. Plans for tunnels to improve the situation in both sections have been drawn up. In June 2017, the decision was taken to tunnel below the Englischer Garten in the area of the Isarring.

In 2013, the City of Munich instigated two feasibility studies to examine how the situation on Landshuter Allee and Tegernseer Landstraße could be improved through construction works. Both evaluations regarded tunnelling as the preferred solution. In November 2015, the City Council declared Landshuter Allee to be the top priority, with Tegernseer Landstraße the second priority. The Isarring is to be handled separately: in 2011, the “Ein Englischer Garten” citi- zens’ initiative conducted a feasibility study on the concept of a tunnel and the subsequent reunification of the 375 hectare park.

Landshuter Allee The Landshuter Allee section of the ring features the route’s highest popula- tion density, and is also subject to the highest traffic burden: in 2016, an aver- age of up to 142,000 vehicles rolled over Donnersbergerbrücke every day, while 4,550 people live along this one kilometre stretch. According to the studies conducted, a new tunnel could be created here – from the end of the northern ramp of Donnersbergerbrücke to the start of the southern ramp of the bridge over Dachauer Straße. The new tunnel would be approximately 1,450 metres in length and, at a rough estimate, would cost around € 537 million. The Depart- ment of Urban Planning and Building Regulation has been involved in prelimi- nary planning. The City Council will make a decision on next steps.

Heavy traffic: Landshuter Allee was one of the sections of the Mittlerer Ring examined in the studies.

38 Tegernseer Landstraße On the Tegernseer Landstraße section of the ring, to the east of Grünwalder Straße, the average traffic flow in 2016 was 129,000 vehicles per 24 hours. There are 4,300 residents living along this one kilometre stretch. The researchers sug- gested extending the Candidtunnel by 880 metres to the McGraw-Graben. Tegernseer Landstraße would then be linked at the same level as Chiem- gaustraße. The initial rough estimate of the costs for the tunnel is € 350 million. Still to be clarified is how the tunnel could be built in the extremely tight space between rows of houses and how the traffic could be redirected acceptably over the entire building phase. At present, detailed studies are being conducted. The first results are expected by the end of 2017. Only then will the City Council make a decision on next steps.

The Isarring and the Englischer Garten The traffic burden on the Isarring, which passes through the Englischer Garten to the north of the Kleinhesseloher See, has significantly increased since the Rich- ard-Strauss-Tunnel was opened in 2009. In 2014, 112,000 vehicles travelled this route every 24 hours. A review of the feasibility study conducted on behalf of the “Ein Englischer Garten” citizens’ initiative showed that a 390 metre tunnel with six lanes could be constructed between Dietlindenstraße and Ifflandstraße. This tunnel would cost € 125 million and, following a six year planning period, would be completed in 4.5 years. In 2016, the Free State of Bavaria approved € 35 mil- lion of support for the project. In March 2017, the City of Munich was promised € 2.67 million as part of the federal support programme “Nationale Projekte des Städtebaus 2017”, and on 28 June 2017 the Federal Ministry for the Environment presented the city with the funding. On the same day, the General Meeting of the City Council unanimously commissioned the Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation to draw up the next steps in the project.

Visualisation of the Isarring tunnel under the Englischer Garten. The “Ein Englis- cher Garten” citizens’ initiative commis- sioned a feasibility study on reunification of the park. The project is supported by funds from the federal support pro- gramme “Nationale Projekte des Städte- baus 2017”.

39 Transport concept for Munich’s north Expansion of Schleißheimer Straße, the city’s tram network and much more

New residential areas and jobs will result in a significant increase in 24 the volume of traffic in Munich’s north in the coming years. The transport concept (Verkehrskonzept) should gradually improve the city’s infrastructure.

Around 5,000 new homes on the site of the former Bayernkaserne, 15,000 additional jobs following expansion of the BMW Group’s Research and Innova- tion Centre (FIZ) on the site of the former Kronprinz-Rupprecht-Kaserne, a new urban planning development around Feldmoching – Munich’s north is charac- terised by a certain dynamic. In order to keep traffic flows in the area tolerable, the Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation has created a con- cept that – in dialogue with the Free State of Bavaria and surrounding commu- nities – will be continually updated in future.

Aspects currently being planned involve expanding and extending Schleißheimer Straße with a connecting road to the Autobahnring A99. In addi- tion, the City of Munich, together with the Free State of Bavaria, is explor- ing the potential use of the Eisenbahnnordring as a new S-Bahn route. This stretch of track leads from Pasing via Knorrstraße to Trudering and is currently used exclusively by freight trains. Tram line 23 is set to be extended to run from Parkstadt Schwabing via the Euro-Industriepark through to Kieferngarten U-Bahn station. From there, a new “lateral” tram line 24 should stretch to Am Hart U-Bahn station. Last but not least, fast bicycle connections are envisaged between Hauptbahnhof and Rathenaustraße as well as to Oberschleißheim and Garching. Further tangential fast cycling paths are also planned.

Yet the transport concept also contains many further components to enhance the Munich transport system. The objective is to reduce car traffic as far as possible, to improve the public transport and cycle network by focussing on specific points, to optimise the existing road network and only to expand it in exceptional circumstances, as well as to reinforce collaboration with the surrounding region. The basis for future developments is formed by the Verkehrsentwicklungsplan (Munich Transport Development Plan) and the aspects of air pollution control and noise reduction.

The winning design, created by Henn Architek- ten with Topotek 1 Landschaftsarchitekten, in the competition for the expansion of the BMW Group’s Research and Innovation Centre (“FIZ Future”).

40 Kunstareal Unique location for culture and academia in Maxvorstadt

The Free State of Bavaria and the City of Munich want to support 25 and network the landscape of museums, art and science around the Pinakothek art museums more effectively. Much has been achieved since 2009 – from the guidance system to the Kunstareal festival.

The Kunstareal lies at the heart of the Maxvorstadt area, sandwiched between Heßstraße, Türkenstraße, Karlstraße, Richard-Wagner-Straße and Enhuberstraße. Various state and municipal art, cultural and academic institutions are concen- trated in this small area of only 66 hectares. Such diversity at close quarters should make Munich a unique location for culture and academia, both in Germany and internationally.

Some work has already been undertaken to this end. For example, the Kunstar- eal was the subject of Munich’s first “citizens’ report”. The 105 participants from Munich and the surrounding region were selected at random and met for several days in September 2013. They worked on almost 1,500 suggestions for the devel- opment of the area around the Pinakothek galleries.

Some recommendations from the citizens’ report and further steps have since been implemented: a network of 21 inscribed steles have guided visitors through the Kunstareal since 2016. A coordination centre was set up to connect the insti- tutions more effectively. A master plan is being drawn up to design the open spaces, while the joint website kunstareal.de was optimised for smartphones and other media. The biennial Kunstareal festival, which gives visitors free entry to all museums, has been an unqualified success.

Traffic had been a source of irritation to many who live and work in the area. In 2015, the City Council decided to repeal the one-way street regulations in parts of Gabelsbergerstraße, Theresienstraße and Türkenstraße. In addition, new cycle Left: The Kunstareal festival attracts numerous paths are planned on Gabelsbergerstraße between Türkenstraße and Arcis- visitors every two years. Right: The guidance straße. In order to improve the visibility between the houses in Gabelberger- system through the Kunstareal: the inscribed straße and Theresienstraße, the pick-up and drop-off zones for touring coaches in steles and T-shaped elements made from acrylic Barer Straße have been relocated. The bus infrastructure of the Kunstareal, which stone were created by the designer includes the Museum Line 100, was expanded in 2016 by Museum Line 150. Nitzan Cohen.

41 Town and river The framework plan for the inner-city stretch of the Isar

The Isar river is a key element of the city’s landscape. Following the 26 renaturation of the southern section, the City Council commissioned creation of a framework plan to enhance the quality of life in the area between the Reichenbachbrücke and the Luitpoldbrücke.

Promenades, terraces, balconies, restaurants – and less traffic: in 2015, the City Council approved the framework plan for the popular, lively but also extremely sensitive section of the Isar. The plan pays particular attention to the footpaths, bridges, islands, the areas around the Deutsches Museum and the St. Lukas and St. Maximilian churches. The framework plan also contains proposals for additional river access points, an improved network of footpaths, conservation of near-natural spaces, restaurants and temporary events. The plan was devel- oped by the urban and landscape planning offices of Mahl Gebhard Konzepte (Munich) and Yellow Z (Berlin).

Transport is also an important topic. A traffic survey has been created in order to explore the scope for development around the Ludwigsbrücke and along the western promenade of the Große Isar in particular. Among other aspects, this should demonstrate whether road lanes or parking spaces could be replaced by paths for pedestrians and cyclists. In the medium term, catering establish- ments, toilets, step systems and river balconies could be created on the west- ern bank of the Isar. The Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation has been entrusted with implementation of this project. Restructuring the open spaces on the Museumsinsel and creating consistent signposting throughout the area will only be achievable in the long term due to the Deutsches Muse- um’s master plan. The issue of whether a pool could be created in the Isar river is the subject of a feasibility study.

This two-kilometre stretch of the Isar not only features the Gasteig, the Alpine Museum and the Patent Offices: associations such as Isarlust, the Münchner Forum and Bund Naturschutz also have a stake in the area’s devel- opment, along with numerous district committees, authorities and transport companies. The “Flussrunde” round-table was created to bring all of these stakeholders together in one place to discuss the next steps in the develop- ment. The initial meeting was held in December 2016, and this dialogue has continued in 2017.

The framework plan for Erhardtstraße between the Corneliusbrücke and Ludwigsbrücke envis- ages “steps down to the river”.

42 Redevelopment

Since 1976, the City of Munich has been actively involved in urban redevelopment projects. Yet redevelopment means much more than simply remedying shortcomings in urban planning. Rather, it focusses on maintaining and improving parts of the city. Reshap- ing open spaces, making energy-related improvements and facili- tating a shared social life are all high priorities.

At present, there are six redevelopment areas and three investiga- tion areas across Munich. In addition to the “Soziale Stadt” pro- gramme, the “Städtebaulicher Denkmalschutz” and “Aktive Stadt- und Ortsteilzentren” funding programmes are also applied in these areas. These programmes are financed by funds from fed- eral government, state government and local communes and pro- vide more intergenerational justice, family-friendliness and integra- tion in urban areas. Münchner Gesellschaft für Stadterneuerung is the restructuring trust for all areas in the city.

Two investigation areas and selected redevelopment areas are presented in detail on the following pages. In each case, integrat- ing residents, local actors and stakeholders in redevelopment pro- cesses is an important component. Aspects of social affairs, health, business, ecology, culture and education are placed on an equal footing with constructional and urban planning issues. The energy-oriented refurbishment and redevelopment of existing buildings in Munich will be a significant challenge for the future.

43 Neuperlach and Moosach Two new investigation areas in Munich

Preparatory investigations for potential redevelopments have begun in Neuperlach and Moosach. Subsidy funds from the “Soziale Stadt” 27 programme are to be used to redevelop buildings, enhance green spaces and open areas and integrate local citizens in the process.

Project information Neuperlach is currently Munich’s largest investigation area. The district is sit- Neuperlach uated in the city’s east, and was part of the largest residential project in the Size: 497 hectares former West Germany in the 1960s and 70s. The homogeneous structure of Residents: 41,000 the residential buildings, with their uniform and sometimes severe design, not only presents a challenge for urban development but also offers immense Moosach possibilities. The focal points of future redevelopments in the area will be to Size: 275 hectares develop future prospects for the large housing estates and their energy-ori- Residents: 24,000 ented refurbishment, to improve the living situation, to make better use of open spaces and to create affordable housing. Solutions must also be found for the sometimes oversized streetscapes, while the Ostpark should also be improved. Urban development funding has already supported the “50 Jahre Neuperlach” celebrations to mark half a century since the district’s construc- tion.

By contrast, the district of Moosach, situated in Munich’s north-west, has a rather diverse, heterogeneous residential structure. Rows of housing extend- ing perpendicular to the road, such as on Karlingerstraße, Gubestraße and Nanga-Parbat-Straße, provide architectural contrast to the older buildings that used to lie at the heart of the district. As a result, particular focus is given to the integrated development of residential settlements from the 1940s to 1960s and creating affordable housing. The district’s former centre is to be reinforced, and more green spaces are to be created. As an initial measure, urban development funding to the tune of € 600,000 is supporting improve- ments to the open spaces in Amphionpark.

A decisive factor in this project’s success is the participation and engagement of local actors and stakeholders. In parallel to the planning work, an intensive campaign is underway to inform the local populace and encourage them to Left: The “Mooskito” meeting point for children participate in the process, using a range of different media, events and work- and young people. Right: The Karl-Marx-Zentrum shops. A targeted, intercultural approach aims to ensure that under-repre- in Neuperlach. sented groups’ voices are heard.

44 Neuaubing-Westkreuz Living and shopping in the district

Urban development funding has been used in Neuaubing-­West­ kreuz since 2012, with the four shopping centres as a particular 28 focus. These centres should now better fulfil their role as local amenities and become attractive meeting points in the area.

Project information The buildings have become outdated, both in terms of their structure and their Size: 350 hectares design. Inconvenient entrances and out-of-date shopping spaces are the causes Residents: 23,000 of the increasing number of retail spaces lying vacant. There are no facilities where visitors can sit and relax; customers now stay away.

This is now set to change thanks to support from the “Aktive Stadt- und Ort- steilzentren” and “Soziale Stadt” urban development funding programmes. The proprietor of the Paul-Ottmann-Zentrum by Westkreuz plans to construct a new building, based on a realisation competition that concluded in 2015 and was sup- ported by development funds. The new development will feature both residen- tial and retail space, as well as a generous, high-quality local square and meeting place – and will be modern and accessible. Opening the shopping centre up to the street will create an attractive location with a range of possible uses.

The shopping centre on Wiesentfelser Straße is also set to be replaced by a new development that will include a district square with a school, church, maypole and bus stops. There are also intriguing ideas for the Forum am Westkreuz shop- ping area and the local retail centre on Limesstraße. The developments at the four shopping centres will use four different strategies, but are together set to create a balanced variety of sectors with high design quality.

Further aspects of the redevelopment in Neuaubing-Westkreuz include improv- ing the provision of green spaces, the living environment in general and pub- lic spaces, as well as addressing the topic of energy. Along with the two local stores, the area also features Munich’s first “Stadtteillabor” (district workshop), Visualisation of the design for the development which opened in June 2016 in the Paul-Ottmann-Zentrum as part of the Euro- of the Paul-Ottmann-Zentrum, created by two pean “Smarter Together” project. The “Stadtteillabor” enables local citizens to Munich-based offices, GSP Architekten and meet with experts and partners from industry and research to develop tangible Rainer Schmidt Landschaftsarchitekten. The solutions for future challenges revolving around urban living. image also depicts the concept to enhance the land across the road.

45 Central retail area in Pasing Identity, nature and retail

Pasing has changed significantly in recent years. Urban develop- ment funding has been used in the district since 2009. These funds 29 have supported a range of measures – from the design competition for Pasing’s Marienplatz through to the renovation of the green area on Manzingerweg.

Project information On 13 May 2017, the third annual Tag der Städtebauförderung (Urban Develop- Size: 36 hectares ment Funding Day), a public ceremony opened the green area on Würminsel. Residents: 3,000 The renovation created a family-friendly leisure space, complete with a play- ground, which is now a perfect spot to relax and wind down. The eye-catch- ing wooden decking along the Würm river invites visitors to take a seat at the water’s edge. The project was supported by the “Aktive Stadt- und Ortsteilzen- tren” urban development funding programme, with the work completed by the Department of Public Construction in under a year.

In October 2015, the realisation competition for the Pasing Marienplatz was awarded. A new building will be built on the formerly municipally-owned site and provide an urban accent. Plans for the building include a hotel and apart- ments. Along with the Pasing Arcaden, this should create an attractive public space, while new retail magnets should enhance the centre of Pasing district.

The City of Munich also created the “aktiv.gestalten” municipal funding pro- gramme to attract private investment. This supports projects relating to the residential environment, the commercial area and urban design in the redevel- opment area. Consultancy is provided by the Münchner Gesellschaft für Stadt­ erneuerung – MGS. A marketing and design concept has been created for shop owners, with its use also aided by development funds. For further information on the district’s development, contact the district centre at Gleichmannstraße 5a.

The objective of the “Aktive Stadt- und Ortsteilzentren” urban development programme is to reinforce urban development and the economy in Pasing. Left: The newly-landscaped green space on Long-standing, small-scale retailers will be supported and an attractive pedes- Manzingerweg. Right: Visualisation of Marien- trian connection created through the existing blocks of buildings. Areas that platz in Pasing, created by Auer Weber contribute significantly to the area’s identity, such as Planegger Straße or Architekten. Kirchplatz Maria Schutz, are set to be improved. The programme has been extended to 2020.

46 District centre of Trudering The local economy and green spaces in focus

The modifications and traffic calming measures on Truderinger 30 Straße are key elements of the redevelopment programme in Trudering. Yet urban development funding is also being used to strengthen the local economy – and to create new green spaces.

Project information The district of Trudering has seen rapid growth in recent decades. Motorised traf- Size: 19.5 hectares fic has increased significantly and impacted on quality of life in the district’s grow- Residents: 530 ing centre. But that’s not all: the Riem Arcaden and the Neuperlach shopping centre (pep) also created competitive pressure for local retail businesses – and, eventually, the time for action had come.

Back in 2010, a district centre with shopping street management facilities was created at Truderinger Straße 203 as part of the “Aktive Stadt- und Ortsteilzen- tren” funding programme. The district centre continues to serve as a point of contact and makes it possible for local residents to engage in all current aspects of urban development. Furthermore, a project group has been established and awarded funds to support small or temporary initiatives and projects.

Similar to its measures in Pasing, the City of Munich also used the “aktiv. gestalten” municipal funding project to attract private investment to the district of Trudering. In addition, the “Marke Trudering” (Trudering brand) was developed and enhanced with businesspeople and citizens alike, and should ensure that the centre of the Trudering district is a place to do business in future. The initial dis- trict marketing event was held in March 2015. Important aspects for the district’s development include reducing traffic in the area and creating well-connected transport routes around Truderinger Straße, as well as creating more green spaces in the district. The newly-designed green spaces on Truderinger Straße were opened in the summer of 2016. While the space was previously a difficult- to-access, abandoned green area, today the site is a retreat for local residents, a high-quality leisure space.

Universally popular: The new green space on Progress on the redevelopment will be evaluated in 2017. The City Council will Truderinger Straße was opened in 2016 (left). then decide on updating the “Aktive Stadt- und Ortsteilzentren” funding pro- Right: District marketing, Trudering style. gramme in Trudering.

47 Tegernseer Landstraße / Chiemgaustraße More public green spaces for leisure and relaxation

The Giesing redevelopment area is heavily built up. Green areas and 31 leisure spaces are therefore even more important. Enhancing such spaces has been a key focus of the district’s redevelopment since 2005, using funds from the “Soziale Stadt” urban development funding programme.

Project information Size: 105 hectares For local residents, the Mittlere Ring is not only a major burden, it is also a sig- Residents: 16,700 nificant barrier, in a similar way to the large commercial area on the former Agfa site. As a result, since 2005, a series of urban development measures and redevelopment projects have been conducted as part of an integrated approach to improve the situation, addressing issues such as transport, noise protection, local amenities, health and education.

Since 2010, the “heart” of efforts to improve green areas and open spaces has been the redevelopment of the Weißenseepark, with intensive involvement of local residents. Since the second construction phase was completed and the space opened in June 2016, the park has offered playgrounds, fitness spaces, peaceful areas and even a BMX track. To establish a range of uses, make the park accessible for all groups in the community and promote a sense of responsibility for the area, the district management of the Münchner Gesells- chaft für Stadterneuerung (MGS) has held a summer programme of events together with the “Regsam” network and the Obergiesing district commit- tee since 2012. The highlight is the annual “Sommer im Park” festival. The third construction phase to improve the Weißenseepark is due to be completed in 2018. The park will then be connected with the centre of the district by Tegern- seer Landstraße via a public green space on the former Agfa site, which cur- rently houses the Giesing car park with an adjacent commercial complex.

Left: The Grünspitz is a popular meeting place The new Giesing Grünspitz has also been welcomed by locals: the green space in Giesing. A range of events and activities on Tegernseer Landstraße at the corner of Martin-Luther-Straße was previously take place here. Right: The third construction used by a car dealer, but is now home to chestnut trees. Since mid-2014, the phase in the redevelopment of Weißen- “Green City” association has used this space to hold gardening events, cultural seepark is currently pending. activities and participation projects together with other local actors.

48 Topics addressed

49 Wohnen für Alle // Socially-appropriate land use // Municipal housing associations // Community building

n Wohnen für Alle access roads, public amenities such as n Community building day-care centres and primary schools, The “Wohnen für Alle” home-build- green spaces and compensation areas, Housing cooperatives and commu- ing programme was enacted in March or undertake to create such facilities nity building ventures play an impor- 2016. In this programme, the City of themselves. In addition, a minimum tant role in creating more affordable Munich takes into account the grow- of 30% of newly-awarded residential housing in Munich. They contribute to ing demand for subsidised housing for building rights are currently granted sustainable settlement development, low-income demographic groups and for socially-appropriate home building, place high value on ecological con- is currently seeking to accelerate con- which also guarantees social diversity struction and co-determination, and struction of such housing. In total, the even in newly-built districts. The regular address the growing interest in cus- “Wohnen für Alle” programme should ongoing dialogue with the construction tomised communal housing types. see construction of around 3,000 af- and property industry has, in the past, fordable homes by 2019. The individ- served to guarantee the success of So- In the past ten years, more than 1,500 ual home-building projects – which are BoN, which will therefore be updated homes have been built by housing co- decentralised and distributed across in future to ensure socially-responsi- operatives and around 700 by com- the entire Munich area – are to be re- ble urban development in Munich. munity building ventures on municipal alised on both municipal and private land, or are currently in the planning land. As well as the municipal hous- stages. With upcoming municipal ing associations, private developers n Municipal housing associations residential developments in Frei- will also be involved and build around ham and the former Bayernkaserne, half of the planned homes. The City The Department of Urban Planning housing cooperatives and commu- Council has made state funding of and Building Regulation oversees the nity building ventures can also ex- over €135 million available in loans. municipal housing associations GWG pect to play a role in major projects and Gewofag. The associations cur- in future. The City of Munich sup- rently own around 61,300 homes, of ports their commitment through a n Socially-appropriate land use which around 23,000 are subsidised. range of measures, and makes 20 to This represents around 7.5% of the to- 40% of the land in large residential de- The Socially Appropriate Land Use tal housing stock in Munich. These velopment areas available for com- Scheme (Sozialgerechte Bodennut- associations are therefore of grow- munity-oriented housing projects. zung – SoBoN) was introduced in Mu- ing socio-political and ecological sig- nich over 20 years ago. The results are nificance. They promote innovative Community-oriented building and liv- impressive: from 1994 to 2016, 150 le- home-building and secure appropri- ing is recommended as an attractive gally-binding development plans were ate, reasonably-priced housing in Mu- and often more economical alterna- produced according to SoBoN prin- nich, in particular for the middle and tive to housing offered by commer- ciples. In total, 46,250 homes have lower income brackets, as well as for cial developments. The members been constructed, with approximately groups of the population who would of a joint building venture, gener- 12,000 of these subsidised. Moreo- otherwise have limited access to the ally the future residents of the prop- ver, almost 16,000 places have been private property market. The business erty, come together at a very early financed in crèches, kindergartens, purpose of GWG and Gewofag is to stage and plan the project together. day-care centres and primary schools. provide secure, safe and socially-re- Housing associations, on the other The City Council had in 1994 elected sponsible housing. Consequently, the hand, aim to supply their mem- to have development beneficiaries, municipal housing associations serve bers with inexpensive housing with- i.e. developers and investors share the to some extent as a regulator on the out chasing capital appreciation. costs and charges incurred through ur- constantly overstretched Munich hous- For anybody who would be inter- ban land-use planning. Yet these as- ing market. The strategic and oper- ested in founding a community-ori- pects cannot be funded completely ationalised objectives of GWG and ented construction project or who from general budgetary resources. Gewofag are conducted at all times would like to participate in such an Since then, the SoBoN scheme has in the context of the City of Munich’s initiative, the central point of con- been applied consistently for all ur- housing policy action programmes, tact for such issues is the Mitbauzen- ban development planning in the city. and updates to these programmes trale at Schwindstraße 1, close to As a result, the development benefi- are agreed by the City Council. From Theresienstraße U-Bahn station. ciaries share the planning and produc- 2018, the two associations aim to build tion costs as well as costs to create a joint total of 1,250 homes per year.

50 Preservation statutes // Conceptual rental housing // European work

n Preservation statutes stable rents. An important element of n European work this is Konzeptioneller Mietwohnungs- There are few other German cities as bau, a conceptual rental housing plan. The development of the City of Mu- dedicated to retaining reasonably As part of this model, 40% of a site nich has long been accompanied by priced housing and expanding the port- area can be sold for construction of the implications of European integra- folio of municipally-owned housing as rental housing with certain long-term tion. The Department of Urban Plan- the City of Munich. One important in- commitments. At the same time, the ning and Building Regulation therefore strument in protecting existing housing City of Munich does not instigate a assists in representing the city’s in- against repurposing and luxury refur- price competition, and instead sells the terests on a European and national bishment are the preservation statutes land at its current market value. This level, and is also an active partner in pursuant to § 172 Baugesetzbuch (Ger- figure tends to be lower than usual be- the context of European cooperation. man Town and Country Planning Code). cause the municipal evaluation of the The work conducted in networks such In areas where preservation statutes land takes into account the commit- as the Association of German Cities apply, all planned modernisation work ments linked to the property. The land (Deutscher Städtetag) and Eurocities must also be approved by the city’s is then awarded to the developer that is particularly important. The policies Department of Social Services, Office presents the most convincing concept of the European Union relating to cit- for Housing and Migration. The aim of in the tender process (concept tender ies and urban issues can only be in- this is to prevent luxury refurbish- process). fluenced at an earlier stage through ments, which often result in tenants collaboration. What is more, in these being displaced, and to retain the com- Konzeptioneller Mietwohnungsbau is times of rapid change, cities can bet- position of the residential population. not a funding programme, and is exclu- ter effect positive urban development Areas subject to preservation statutes sively engaged in encouraging the pri- when they learn from one another. are always areas or districts in which vately-funded construction of rental Consequently, the City of Munich the housing stock demonstrates a cer- housing. The combination of awarding also participates in working groups tain potential for appreciation. How- land at its market value and the accom- and projects with other cities. This ex- ever, in such cases, the preservation panying commitments act as a depres- change is supported and promoted by statutes are not an instrument by sant on the land value. As a result, the knowledge networks, such as the Eu- which to protect individual tenants, and economic viability of the project is as- ropean Urban Knowledge Network are rather intended to monitor the con- sured for the developer, despite the re- and the Urban Platform Danube Re- stitution of the residential population, if duced land prices. As this model was gion, as well as by national platforms this is required for specific urban plan- completely unique anywhere in Ger- like the German Institute for Urban Af- ning reasons (environmental protec- many, there was no prior experience to fairs (Deutsches Institut für Urbanis- tion). Since March 2014, the process of indicate how the project might fare. tik), which offers practical knowledge converting a property into condomini- Therefore, three initial pilot projects on all aspects of urban development. ums has also been subject to addi- were started for 700 homes: on the Moreover, the European pilot project tional approval. Preservation statutes site of the former Prinz-Eugen-Ka- LOS_DAMA! (Landscape and Open are restricted to five years. If required, serne, at Messestadt Riem and at Space Development in Alpine Metro- such statutes are inspected before Parkstadt Schwabing. In these pilot politan Areas) supports the common their expiry with a view to being reis- projects, the stipulations and commit- development of open spaces in the sued. As of June 2017, there are 21 ments – as intended – led to a reduc- metropolitan municipalities of the Al- preservation statute areas, in which tion in the land prices. They were pine region. The Department of Ur- 261,000 residents live in 146,000 between 35% and 50% below the ban Planning and Building Regulation homes. market value for housing plots that are hopes that, through this collabora- sold without any commitments or con- tion with partners from Germany, Aus- n Conceptual rental housing ditions attached. Further projects then tria, France, Italy and Slovenia, it can followed. The result: despite the signifi- meet its greatest challenges. How The City of Munich is breaking the cant commitments and conditions, the can urban areas in the Alpine region mould when awarding land to develop- Konzeptioneller Mietwohnungsbau be maintained, protected and devel- ers: in order to improve the situation programme was well-received by de- oped between the priorities of resi- on the housing market, in 2013 the City velopers and housing associations and dential development, local recreation, Council approved a decision of princi- was therefore continued. transport, nature conservation, agri- ple containing measures to combat ris- culture and forestry, among other as- ing land prices and to promote more pects? How can these regions meet

51 Schul- und Kita-Bau 2020 action programme // Sustainable urban planning and climate-conscious urban development // Construction supervision

new societal requirements? And – from primary schools to schools for zungsplan) in order to facilitate sustain- how can they involve their popula- children with special educational needs able energy planning that integrates all tions in this work? Pilot projects in to grammar schools. For day-care of aspects on a general municipal level, Salzburg, Vienna, Ljubljana, Trento, small children, an additional 750 new using a self-consistent database that Turin, Grenoble and Munich aim to nursery places and 1,060 new kinder- can also be updated. reveal transferable approaches. In garten places were built in 2016. Munich, the City authorities are col- laborating closely with regional ac- n Construction supervision tors. The initial event for this project n Sustainable urban plan- was held on 31 May and 1 June 2017. ning and climate-cons- Each construction project in this re- cious urban development port requires a final building permis- sion. The Bavarian building regulations n Sc hul- und Kita-Bau 2020 Sustainability in urban planning and cli- ensure that a ceiling will not collapse – action programme mate-conscious urban development even if the building is on fire. Compli- are relevant to all projects of the De- ance with these regulations is ensured The sustained population growth in partment of Urban Planning and Build- by the staff at the Lower Construc- Munich is also clearly noticeable in ing Regulation. As a member of the tion Regulatory Authority (Untere the area of schools and day-care facili- Climate Alliance, the City of Munich Bauaufsichtsbehörde) in the Building ties. In November 2014, the action pro- has set itself the target of reducing ­Authority (Lokalbaukommission – LBK). gramme “Schul- und Kita-Bau 2020” carbon dioxide emissions by around was initiated – and is the largest pro- 50% by the year 2030. To achieve this The Lokalbaukommission has ap- gramme for the construction of com- target, 55 measures have been drawn proved construction projects for more munal education facilities in Germany. up. They range from procuring elec- than 41,000 housing units between In the coming years, the City of Mu- tric cars for the municipal vehicle fleet 2012 and 2016. In 2016, at almost new nich will invest billions of euros in the to integrating aspects of sustainability 10,000 housing units, home construc- construction, expansion and refurbish- in development plans. For urban plan- tion reached a level last seen when ment of schools and day-care facilities. ners, sustainability in the sense of a Munich hosted the Olympic Games. joint consideration of ecological, eco- Preparatory bodies in the form of the nomic, social and built environment Building work in an already densely- “Arbeitsgruppe Ausbauoffensive issues means taking all of these as- populated city often results in con- Kindertageseinrichtungen” (Working pects into account to achieve bal- flicts. An area’s existing residents Group on the Day-Care Facility Expan- anced, sustainable urban planning. often consider constructional changes sion Campaign) and the “Arbeitsgruppe In addition, in 2016 the Committee for in their vicinity as an intrusion and in- Schulbauoffensive” (Working Group on Urban Planning and Building Regula- terruption. The Lokalbaukommission the School Building Campaign) were tion approved development of a sys- processes 6,000 construction super- established by Mayoress Christine tem for planning energy usage which, vision processes every year in this Strobl in 2009 and 2013 respectively. together with other instruments, aims strained environment. Either the de- These bodies are composed of repre- to achieve the following: urban areas veloper complains because they have sentatives from all relevant municipal with energetic irregularities should be not achieved what they wanted – or lo- departments: the Department of Urban identified and affordable housing cal residents complain when they be- Planning and Building Regulation for ur- should also be secured with regards to lieve a project that the authorities can ban planning issues and aspects of energy costs. Planning processes or must approve to be excessive. The building law; the Department of Public should be accelerated and a monitor- Lokalbaukommission always plays the Construction for the technical realisa- ing system should provide information role of mediator in this conflict be- tion of construction projects; the on the energetic status of Munich tween implementing the requirements Department of Education and Sports buildings. The City of Munich also has a of building regulations, ensuring the for issues of demand and pedagogical range of concepts and individual plan- compliance of parties involved in con- requirements; the Department of Com- ning instruments, partial (spatial and struction and taking into account the munal Services and the Department of specialist) aspects of which relate to expectations of the society in a grow- Finance and Budget for issues of fi- climate change and energy planning. ing city place on “their authorities”. nancing, as well as the­ ­Department of However, a central link between them Transparency and dependability, but Social Services. By 2030, around 45 is missing. This function is undertaken also swiftness and decisiveness schools should be built in this manner by the energy usage plan (Energienut- are qualities demonstrated by the

52 Architectural conservation // Nature conservation

Lokalbaukommission and the bod- tion permission processes and around relates, for example, to shows, zoos ies it serves. The Lokalbaukommis- 800 building permit processes for ad- and private individuals and ranges from sion uses on-site spot inspections vertising structures which involved is- exotic birds to rare spiders and fish to not only to ensure safety in construc- sues of architectural conservation. They rhinoceroses. The Lower Nature Con- tion, but also to implement new top- also provided 5,000 individual consul- servation Authority monitors around ics, such as accessibility or compliance tancy sessions. 2,000 cases with private and com- with energy standards, to name but mercial owners every year, and con- a few of their areas of responsibility. ducts the designation and registration n Nature conservation process in line with the Federal Ordi- nance on the Conservation of Spe- n Architectural conservation Around 19% of Munich’s urban space cies (Bundesartenschutzverordnung). consist of protected areas, the larg- Munich boasts a wealth of listed build- est of which are the Englischer Garten ings, with the spectrum extending and the Isarauen. All protected areas from the Löwenturm on Rindermarkt in Munich are integrated in a protected dating back to the 15th century through area concept. This include regular to the BMW tower on Petuelring. As- monitoring of these areas and natu- signing this protected status is the task ral monuments, with over 500 mon- of the Lower Architectural Conserva- itoring visits conducted every year. tion Authority (Untere Denkmalschutz- behörde), located in the Department of For flora-fauna-habitat areas, the Urban Planning and Building Regulation. Lower Nature Conservation Author- ity (Untere Naturschutzbehörde), For a city like Munich, architectural con- which is assigned to the Depart- servation is undertaken as a matter of ment of Urban Planning and Build- course. After all, identity and a sense ing Regulation, reports to Brussels of “home” are strongly influenced by and is involved in producing manage- buildings and their integrity. A view into ment plans for these areas. If a tree the future is only provided through the has to be cut down, the Lower Na- kaleidoscope of the past. Though opin- ture Conservation Authority weighs the ions may vary when it comes to spe- matter up first. Almost every tree af- cific issues, the key significance of fected is taken into account and a so- architectural conservation is undis- lution for its conservation sought. puted even 40 years after the Bavarian The Lower Nature Conservation Au- Architectural Conservation Law (Baye­ thority also includes the Green Space risches Denkmalschutzgesetz) was Expert Team (Team Grüngutachten), passed. which is responsible for the “green” aspects of the building permission pro- In addition to the roughly 7,000 individ- cess. The submitted tree population ual listed buildings and 76 groups of plans or open space design plans are listed buildings from past architectural generally also examined in site vis- eras, buildings from the post-war years its. If a building plan is located outside (the 1950s, 60s, and 70s) deserve spe- the city centre, the so-called mitiga- cial consideration. The Bavarian State tion regulation (Eingriffsregelung) ap- Office for Architectural Conservation plies. This requires developers to offset (Bayerisches Landesamt für Denkmalp- appropriately any newly paved areas flege) is responsible for awarding listed or trees felled as part of their project. building status, while the Lower Archi- These offsetting areas are managed tectural Conservation Authority is re- through an environmental land register. sponsible for ensuring compliance with The Local Nature Conservation Author- this legislation. In 2016, the Lower ity is also tasked with monitoring the Architectural­ Conservation Authority requirements of national, European dealt with 2,300 architectural conserva- and international law. This legislation

53 Imprint

Publisher City of Munich Department of Urban Planning and Building Regulation Blumenstraße 31, 80331 Munich www.muenchen.de/plan Project management Petra Fröschl (editing), Sabrina Rott Copy-editing Susann Waldmann Concept, design Christian Hölzl, Johanna Hermenau; HUND B. communication, Munich Translation Baker & Harrison, Munich Printing G. Peschke Druckerei GmbH

Munich, July 2017

Image credits All parts of this publication are copyright protected. Any use is prohibited without the prior approval of the City of Munich (LHM). – Page 5: LHM – Pages 6 and 7: Edward Beierle – Page 9: Maurer und Sigl – Page 10: Studio Rio – Page 11: Urban Catalyst Studio – Page 12: Zillerplus Architekten und Stadtplaner, Lex Kerfers Landschaftsarchitekten / GWG – Page 13: Lukas Barth / LHM – Page 14: Michael Nagy / LHM (left), Anja Wechsler – Page 15: LHM – Page 16: Gert F. Goergens – Page 17: Hollwich Kushner Architecture (right), LHM – Page 18: Michael Nagy / LHM (left), Yves Krier – Page 19: Leonie Baumeister (left), Michael Nagy / LHM – Page 20: Klaus D. Wolff / Münchner Gesellschaft für Stadterneuerung (MGS) – Page 23: AllesWirdGut Architektur, DnD Landschaftsarchitekten / Gewofag (top left), LHM (top right), Felix + Jonas Architekten, Mahl Gebhard Konzepte / GWG (bottom left), LHM (bottom right) – Pages 24 and 25: Christin Büttner – Page 26: Edward Beierle (left), Max Dudler, Hilmer & Sattler and Albrecht, Adelheid Schönborn – Page 27: Meck Architekten, Studio B Landschaftsarchitektur / BLV Objekt Pasing GmbH (left), Allmann Sattler Wappner, Realgrün Landschaftsarchitekten / BLV Objekt Pasing GmbH – Page 28: Rapp Architekten with Müllerblaustein und Brüggemann / GWG – Page 29: Michael Heinrich – Page 30: Bayerische Hausbau – Page 31: Vadim Kretschmer – Page 32: 03 Architekten – Page 33: Teleinternetcafe, TH Treibhaus – Page 35: LHM – Page 36: Auer Weber / Deutsche Bahn – Page 37: Stephan Hauff / DB Netz AG – Page 38: LHM – Page 39: Jürgen Dudowits / sunpatrol – Page 40: Henn Architekten, Topotek 1 Landschaftsarchitekten / BMW – Page 41: der Pinakothek der Moderne (left), Geschäftsstelle Kunstareal München – Page 42: Mahl Gebhard Konzepte – Page 44: LHM (left), Ben Kuhlmann – Page 45: GSP Architekten, Rainer Schmidt Landschaftsarchitekten / SBI GmbH – Page 46: LHM (left), Auer Weber Architekten – Page 47: Edward Beierle / MGS – Page 48: Jonas Nefzger / MGS

54 www.muenchen.de/plan